Back to index

4.12.11

Jump to: Complete Features | Incomplete Features | Complete Epics | Incomplete Epics | Other Complete | Other Incomplete |

Changes from 4.11.59

Note: this page shows the Feature-Based Change Log for a release

Complete Features

These features were completed when this image was assembled

Feature OBSDA-143: Add runbook_url to alerts in the OCP UI

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Add runbook_url to alerts in the OCP UI

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
If an alert includes a runbook_url label, then it should appear in the UI for the alert as a link.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
Customer can easily reach the alert runbook and be able to address their issues.

4. List any affected packages or components.

Feature OCPPLAN-4927: The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Only Red Hat employees and contractors)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Only Red Hat employees and contractors)
Feature OCPPLAN-7589: The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Only Red Hat employees and contractors)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Only Red Hat employees and contractors)
Epic CONSOLE-3160: Make console operator optional

Epic Goal

  • Make it possible to disable the console operator at install time, while still having a supported+upgradeable cluster.

Why is this important?

  • It's possible to disable console itself using spec.managementState in the console operator config. There is no way to remove the console operator, though. For clusters where an admin wants to completely remove console, we should give the option to disable the console operator as well.

Scenarios

  1. I'm an administrator who wants to minimize my OpenShift cluster footprint and who does not want the console installed on my cluster

Acceptance Criteria

  • It is possible at install time to opt-out of having the console operator installed. Once the cluster comes up, the console operator is not running.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Composable cluster installation

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1srswUYYHIbKT5PAC5ZuVos9T2rBnf7k0F1WV2zKUTrA/edit#heading=h.mduog8qznwz
  2. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1U2zYAyrNGBooGBuyQME8Xn905RvOPbVv3XFw3stddZw/edit#slide=id.g10555cc0639_0_7

Open questions::

  1. The console operator manages the downloads deployment as well. Do we disable the downloads deployment? Long term we want to move to CLI manager: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/6ae78842d4a87593c63274e02ac7a33cc7f296c3/enhancements/oc/cli-manager.md

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
Story CONSOLE-3220: Update console-operator's manifests with capability annotation

In the console-operator repo we need to add `capability.openshift.io/console` annotation to all the manifests that the operator either contains creates on the fly.

 

Manifests are currently present in /bindata and /manifest directories.

 

Here is example of the insights-operator change.

Here is the overall enhancement doc.

 

Feature OCPPLAN-7783: CSI Cloud Providers

Feature Overview
Provide CSI drivers to replace all the intree cloud provider drivers we currently have. These drivers will probably be released as tech preview versions first before being promoted to GA.

Goals

  • Framework for rapid creation of CSI drivers for our cloud providers
  • CSI driver for AWS EBS
  • CSI driver for AWS EFS
  • CSI driver for GCP
  • CSI driver for Azure
  • CSI driver for VMware vSphere
  • CSI Driver for Azure Stack
  • CSI Driver for Alicloud
  • CSI Driver for IBM Cloud

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Framework for CSI driver  TBD Yes
Drivers should be available to install both in disconnected and connected mode   Yes
Drivers should upgrade from release to release without any impact   Yes
Drivers should be installable via CVO (when in-tree plugin exists)    

Out of Scope

This work will only cover the drivers themselves, it will not include

  • enhancements to the CSI API framework
  • the migration to said drivers from the the intree drivers
  • work for non-cloud provider storage drivers (FC-SAN, iSCSI) being converted to CSI drivers

Background, and strategic fit
In a future Kubernetes release (currently 1.21) intree cloud provider drivers will be deprecated and replaced with CSI equivalents, we need the drivers created so that we continue to support the ecosystems in an appropriate way.

Assumptions

  • Storage SIG won't move out the changeover to a later Kubernetes release

Customer Considerations
Customers will need to be able to use the storage they want.

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: cluster admins
  • Updated content: update storage docs to show how to use these drivers (also better expose the capabilities)
Epic STOR-880: CSI operator for Google Cloud Filestore (Tech Preview)

This Epic is to track the GA of this feature

Goal

  • Make available the Google Cloud File Service via a CSI driver, it is desirable that this implementation has dynamic provisioning
  • Without GCP filestore support, we are limited to block / RWO only (GCP PD 4.8 GA)
  • Align with what we support on other major public cloud providers.

Why is this important?

  • There is a know storage gap with google cloud where only block is supported
  • More customers deploying on GCE and asking for file / RWX storage.

Scenarios

  1. Install the CSI driver
  2. Remove the CSI Driver
  3. Dynamically provision a CSI Google File PV*
  4. Utilise a Google File PV
  5. Assess optional features such as resize & snapshot

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. …

Open questions::

  1. …

Customers::

  • Telefonica Spain
  • Deutsche Bank

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
Story STOR-956: Build images for GCP Filestore CSI Driver and Operator

As an OCP user, I want images for GCP Filestore CSI Driver and Operator, so that I can install them on my cluster and utilize GCP Filestore shares.

Feature OCPPLAN-7784: Storage Maintainability

We need to continue to maintain specific areas within storage, this is to capture that effort and track it across releases.

Goals

  • To allow OCP users and cluster admins to detect problems early and with as little interaction with Red Hat as possible.
  • When Red Hat is involved, make sure we have all the information we need from the customer, i.e. in metrics / telemetry / must-gather.
  • Reduce storage test flakiness so we can spot real bugs in our CI.

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Telemetry   No
Certification   No
API metrics   No
     

Out of Scope

n/a

Background, and strategic fit
With the expected scale of our customer base, we want to keep load of customer tickets / BZs low

Assumptions

Customer Considerations

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: internal
  • Updated content: none at this time.

Notes

In progress:

  • CI flakes:
    • Configurable timeouts for e2e tests
      • Azure is slow and times out often
      • Cinder times out formatting volumes
      • AWS resize test times out

 

High prio:

  • Env. check tool for VMware - users often mis-configure permissions there and blame OpenShift. If we had a tool they could run, it might report better errors.
    • Should it be part of the installer?
    • Spike exists
  • Add / use cloud API call metrics
    • Helps customers to understand why things are slow
    • Helps build cop to understand a flake
      • With a post-install step that filters data from Prometheus that’s still running in the CI job.
    • Ideas:
      • Cloud is throttling X% of API calls longer than Y seconds
      • Attach / detach / provisioning / deletion / mount / unmount / resize takes longer than X seconds?
    • Capture metrics of operations that are stuck and won’t finish.
      • Sweep operation map from executioner???
      • Report operation metric into the highest bucket after the bucket threshold (i.e. if 10minutes is the last bucket, report an operation into this bucket after 10 minutes and don’t wait for its completion)?
      • Ask the monitoring team?
    • Include in CSI drivers too.
      • With alerts too

Unsorted

  • As the number of storage operators grows, it would be grafana board for storage operators
    • CSI driver metrics (from CSI sidecars + the driver itself  + its operator?)
    • CSI migration?
  • Get aggregated logs in cluster
    • They're rotated too soon
    • No logs from dead / restarted pods
    • No tools to combine logs from multiple pods (e.g. 3 controller managers)
  • What storage issues customers have? it was 22% of all issues.
    • Insufficient docs?
    • Probably garbage
  • Document basic storage troubleshooting for our supports
    • What logs are useful when, what log level to use
    • This has been discussed during the GSS weekly team meeting; however, it would be beneficial to have this documented.
  • Common vSphere errors, their debugging and fixing. 
  • Document sig-storage flake handling - not all failed [sig-storage] tests are ours
Epic STOR-500: The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
Story STOR-794: Block 4.12 to 4.13 upgrade if Hardware version < 15 or vSphere < 7.0

The End of General support for vSphere 6.7 will be on October 15, 2022. So, vSphere 6.7 will be deprecated for 4.11.

We want to encourage vSphere customers to upgrade to vSphere 7 in OCP 4.11 since VMware is EOLing (general support) for vSphere 6.7 in Oct 2022.

We want the cluster Upgradeable=false + have a strong alert pointing to our docs / requirements.

related slack: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CH06KMDRV/p1647541493096729

Epic STOR-857: OCP 4.12 release chores

Epic Goal

  • Update all images that we ship with OpenShift to the latest upstream releases and libraries.
  • Exact content of what needs to be updated will be determined as new images are released upstream, which is not known at the beginning of OCP development work. We don't know what new features will be included and should be tested and documented. Especially new CSI drivers releases may bring new, currently unknown features. We expect that the amount of work will be roughly the same as in the previous releases. Of course, QE or docs can reject an update if it's too close to deadline and/or looks too big.

Traditionally we did these updates as bugfixes, because we did them after the feature freeze (FF). Trying no-feature-freeze in 4.12. We will try to do as much as we can before FF, but we're quite sure something will slip past FF as usual.

Why is this important?

  • We want to ship the latest software that contains new features and bugfixes.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
Story STOR-867: Chore: Update ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver to the latest release

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

This includes ibm-vpc-node-label-updater!

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Story STOR-1060: Chore: Update ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver to v5.0.0

There is a new driver release 5.0.0 since the last rebase that includes snapshot support:

https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver/releases/tag/v5.0.0

Rebase the driver on v5.0.0 and update the deployments in ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator.
There are no corresponding changes in ibm-vpc-node-label-updater since the last rebase.

Story STOR-864: Chore: Update azure-disk-csi-driver to the latest release

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Story STOR-863: Chore: Update vmware-vsphere-csi-driver to the latest release

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Story STOR-860: Chore: Update aws-ebs-csi-driver to the latest release

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Story STOR-865: Chore: Update azure-file-csi-driver to the latest release

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Story STOR-862: Chore: Update gcp-pd-csi-driver to the latest release

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Story STOR-858: Chore: update libraries in all operators

Update all OCP and kubernetes libraries in storage operators to the appropriate version for OCP release.

This includes (but is not limited to):

  • Kubernetes:
    • client-go
    • controller-runtime
  • OCP:
    • library-go
    • openshift/api
    • openshift/client-go
    • operator-sdk

Operators:

  • aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator 
  • aws-efs-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-file-csi-driver-operator
  • openstack-cinder-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-filestore-csi-driver-operator
  • manila-csi-driver-operator
  • ovirt-csi-driver-operator
  • vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator
  • alibaba-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator
  • csi-driver-shared-resource-operator

 

  • cluster-storage-operator
  • csi-snapshot-controller-operator
  • local-storage-operator
  • vsphere-problem-detector
Feature OCPPLAN-7786: CSI Migration

Epic Goal

  • Enable the migration from a storage intree driver to a CSI based driver with minimal impact to the end user, applications and cluster
  • These migrations would include, but are not limited to:
    • CSI driver for AWS EBS
    • CSI driver for GCP
    • CSI driver for Azure (file and disk)
    • CSI driver for VMware vSphere

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift needs to maintain it's ability to enable PVCs and PVs of the main storage types
  • CSI Migration is getting close to GA, we need to have the feature fully tested and enabled in OpenShift
  • Upstream intree drivers are being deprecated to make way for the CSI drivers prior to intree driver removal

Scenarios

  1. User initiated move to from intree to CSI driver
  2. Upgrade initiated move from intree to CSI driver
  3. Upgrade from EUS to EUS

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. …

Open questions::

  1. …

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
Epic STOR-690: CSI Migration for GCE (GA)

This Epic tracks the GA of this feature

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift needs to maintain it's ability to enable PVCs and PVs of the main storage types
  • CSI Migration is getting close to GA, we need to have the feature fully tested and enabled in OpenShift
  • Upstream intree drivers are being deprecated to make way for the CSI drivers prior to intree driver removal

Scenarios

  1. User initiated move to from intree to CSI driver
  2. Upgrade initiated move from intree to CSI driver
  3. Upgrade from EUS to EUS

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. …

Open questions::

  1. …

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
Story STOR-752: Change the default StorageClass to the CSI one

On new installations, we should make the StorageClass created by the CSI operator the default one. 

However, we shouldn't do that on an upgrade scenario. The main reason is that users might have set  a different quota on the CSI driver Storage Class.

Exit criteria:

  • New clusters get the CSI Storage Class as the default one.
  • Existing clusters don't get their default Storage Classes changed.
Epic STOR-575: The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
Story STOR-764: Change the default StorageClass to the CSI one

On new installations, we should make the StorageClass created by the CSI operator the default one. 

However, we shouldn't do that on an upgrade scenario. The main reason is that users might have set  a different quota on the CSI driver Storage Class.

Exit criteria:

  • New clusters get the CSI Storage Class as the default one.
  • Existing clusters don't get their default Storage Classes changed.
Feature OCPPLAN-8108: The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Only Red Hat employees and contractors)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Only Red Hat employees and contractors)
Epic OCPBUILD-30: Build Rebases OCP 4.11

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Rebase OpenShift components to k8s v1.24

Why is this important?

  • Rebasing ensures components work with the upcoming release of Kubernetes
  • Address tech debt related to upstream deprecations and removals.

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. k8s 1.24 release

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. …

Open questions::

  1. …

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
Feature OCPPLAN-8150: Agent-Based Installer GA

Feature Overview

  • As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.
  • As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

  • Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

  • Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
  • Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
  • Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
  • Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
  • In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
  • For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
  • Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
  • The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
  • The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

  • As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
  • As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
  • As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
  • As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
  • As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

  •  

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

  • As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
  • As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

  • This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

  1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
  2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
  3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

 

References

 

 

Epic AGENT-61: Ensure FIPS compliant deployment

Set the ClusterDeployment CRD to deploy OpenShift in FIPS mode and make sure that after deployment the cluster is set in that mode

Task AGENT-375: AgentClusterInstall asset generation include installconfigoverrides annotation when FIPS is set in installconfig

In order to install FIPS compliant clusters, we need to make sure that installconfig + agentoconfig based deployments take into account the FIPS config in installconfig.

This task is about passing the config to agentclusterinstall so it makes it into the iso. Once there, AGENT-374 will give it to assisted service

Epic AGENT-189: Provision IPv4/IPv6 dual-stack and single-stack IPv6 clusters

Epic Goal

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with dual-stack IPv4/IPv6

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with single-stack IPv6

Why is this important?

IPv6 and dual-stack clusters are requested often by customers, especially from Telco customers. Working with dual-stack clusters is a requirement for many but also a transition into a single-stack IPv6 clusters, which for some of our users is the final destination.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Agent-based installer can deploy IPv6 clusters
  • Agent-based installer can deploy dual-stack clusters
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Previous Work

Karim's work proving how agent-based can deploy IPv6: IPv6 deploy with agent based installer]

Done Checklist * CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.

  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>|
Task AGENT-351: Add MachineNetwork to agent-cluster-install generate for dual-stack

For dual-stack installations the agent-cluster-install.yaml must have both an IPv4 and IPv6 subnet in the networkking.MachineNetwork or assisted-service will throw an error. This field is in InstallConfig but it must be added to agent-cluster-install in its Generate().

For IPv4 and IPv6 installs, setting up the MachineNetwork is not needed but it also does not cause problems if its set, so it should be fine to set it all times.

Epic AGENT-84: Support requesting components such as MCE at installation time

Epic Goal

As an OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy a cluster zero with RHACM or MCE and have the required components installed when the installation is completed

Why is this important?

BILLI makes it easier to deploy a cluster zero. BILLI users know at installation time what the purpose of their cluster is when they plan the installation. Day-2 steps are necessary to install operators and users, especially when automating installations, want to finish the installation flow when their required components are installed.

Acceptance Criteria

  • A user can provide MCE manifests and have it installed without additional manual steps after the installation is completed
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
Story AGENT-330: Install MCE using extra manifests at install time (disconnected)

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

Story AGENT-328: Install MCE using extra manifests at install time (connected)

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

Feature OCPPLAN-9015: The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Only Red Hat employees and contractors)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Only Red Hat employees and contractors)
Epic OCPCLOUD-1663: Rebase cluster autoscaler on Kubernetes 1.25

Epic Goal

  • Rebase cluster autoscaler on top of Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Need to pick up latest upstream changes

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. …

Open questions::

  1. …

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
Story OCPCLOUD-1677: Update cluster autoscaler operator to use --record-duplicated-events flag

User Story

As a user I would like to see all the events that the autoscaler creates, even duplicates. Having the CAO set this flag will allow me to continue to see these events.

Background

We have carried a patch for the autoscaler that would enable the duplication of events. This patch can now be dropped because the upstream added a flag for this behavior in https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/pull/4921

Steps

  • add the --record-duplicated-events flag to all autoscaler deployments from the CAO

Stakeholders

  • openshift eng

Definition of Done

  • autoscaler continues to work as expected and produces events for everything
  • Docs
  • this does not require documentation as it preserves existing behavior and provides no interface for user interaction
  • Testing
  • current tests should continue to pass
Feature OCPPLAN-9052: IBM Public Cloud support (GA)

Feature Overview

Add GA support for deploying OpenShift to IBM Public Cloud

Goals

Complete the existing gaps to make OpenShift on IBM Cloud VPC (Next Gen2) General Available

Requirements

Optional requirements

  • OpenShift can be deployed using Mint mode and STS for cloud provider credentials (future release, tbd)
  • OpenShift can be deployed in disconnected mode https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SPLAT-737)
  • OpenShift on IBM Cloud supports User Provisioned Infrastructure (UPI) deployment method (future release, 4.14?)
Epic SPLAT-731: Enable installation of private clusters on IBM Cloud

Epic Goal

  • Enable installation of private clusters on IBM Cloud. This epic will track associated work.

Why is this important?

  • This is required MVP functionality to achieve GA.

Scenarios

  1. Install a private cluster on IBM Cloud.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. …

Open questions::

  1. …

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
Feature OCPPLAN-9332: Ability to apply hotfix packages to RHCOS via Layering

Background and Goal

Currently in OpenShift we do not support distributing hotfix packages to cluster nodes. In time-sensitive situations, a RHEL hotfix package can be the quickest route to resolving an issue. 

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Under guidance from Red Hat CEE, customers can deploy RHEL hotfix packages to MachineConfigPools.
  2. Customers can easily remove the hotfix when the underlying RHCOS image incorporates the fix.
Epic MCO-293: Replace machine-os-content with new format base image

Before we ship OCP CoreOS layering in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-165 we need to switch the format of what is currently `machine-os-content` to be the new base image.

The overall plan is:

  • Publish the new base image as `rhel-coreos-8` in the release image
  • Also publish the new extensions container (https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763) as `rhel-coreos-8-extensions`
  • Teach the MCO to use this without also involving layering/build controller
  • Delete old `machine-os-content`
Story MCO-289: Teach the MCO to use new extensions container

After https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763 is in the release image, teach the MCO how to use it. This is basically:

  • Schedule the extensions container as a kubernetes service (just serves a yum repo via http)
  • Change the MCD to write a file into `/etc/yum.repos.d/machine-config-extensions.repo` that consumes it instead of what it does now in pulling RPMs from the mounted container filesystem
Story MCO-371: Add telemetry to collect data on how many cluster is using custom osImageURL

As a OCP CoreOS layering developer, having telemetry data about number of cluster using osImageURL will help understand how broadly this feature is getting used and improve accordingly.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Cluster using Custom osImageURL is available via telemetry
Feature OCPSTRAT-103: Ensuring the Control Plane is Fully Decoupled for Hosted Control Planes

 

Why?

  • Decouple control and data plane. 
    • Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.
  • Improve security
    • Shift credentials out of cluster that support the operation of core platform vs workload
  • Improve cost
    • Allow a user to toggle what they don’t need.
    • Ensure a smooth path to scale to 0 workers and upgrade with 0 workers.

 

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

 

 

Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

Epic STOR-961: Ensure cluster-snapshot-controller-operator is running on hosted control planes

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

cluster-snapshot-controller-operator is running on the CP. 

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

Story STOR-971: Update snapshot operator for HyperShift

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Move creation of manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml from CVO to the operator - it needs to be created in the management cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift by
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Don’t create operand’s PodDisruptionBudget?
    • Update ValidationWebhookConfiguration to point directly to URL exposed by manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml instead of a Service. The Service is not available in the guest cluster.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (both the webhook and csi-snapshot-controller).
    • Update unit tests to handle two kube clients.

Exit criteria:

  • cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • csi-snapshot-controller runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • It is possible to take & restore volume snapshot in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.
Story STOR-970: Refactor snapshot operator

As OpenShift developer I want cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator to use existing controllers in library-go, so I don’t need to maintain yet another code that does the same thing as library-go.

  • Check and remove manifests/03_configmap.yaml, it does not seem to be useful.
  • Check and remove manifests/03_service.yaml, it does not seem to be useful (at least now).
  • Use DeploymentController from library-go to sync Deployments.
  • Get rid of common/ package? It does not seem to be useful.
  • Use StaticResourceController for static content, including the snapshot CRDs.

Note: if this refactoring introduces any new conditions, we must make sure that 4.11 snapshot controller clears them to support downgrade! This will need 4.11 BZ + z-stream update!

Similarly, if some conditions become obsolete / not managed by any controller, they must be cleared by 4.12 operator.

Exit criteria:

  • The operator code is smaller.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.
  • Upgrade/downgrade from/to standalone OCP 4.11 works.
Epic STOR-960: Ensure openshift cluster-storage-operator & aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator are running on hosted control planes

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

Run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) + AWS EBS CSI driver operator + AWS EBS CSI driver control-plane Pods in the management cluster, run the driver DaemonSet in the hosted cluster.

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

 

Story STOR-1053: Sync hypershift dump-guest-cluster with must-gather

As OCP support engineer I want the same guest cluster storage-related objects in output of "hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster" as in "oc adm must-gather ", so I can debug storage issues easily.

 

must-gather collects: storageclasses persistentvolumes volumeattachments csidrivers csinodes volumesnapshotclasses volumesnapshotcontents

hypershift collects none of this, the relevant code is here: https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/blob/bcfade6676f3c344b48144de9e7a36f9b40d3330/cmd/cluster/core/dump.go#L276

 

Exit criteria:

  • verify that hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster has storage objects from the guest cluster.
Story STOR-1039: Update cluster-storage-operator for HyperShift

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (AWS EBS CSI driver operator).

Exit criteria:

  • CSO and AWS EBS CSI driver operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.
Story STOR-1040: Update AWS EBS CSI driver operator for HyperShift

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run AWS EBS CSI driver operator + control plane of the CSI driver in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
  •  
  •  
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operand (control-plane Deployment of the CSI driver).

Exit criteria:

  • Control plane Deployment of AWS EBS CSI driver runs in the management cluster in HyperShift.
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.
Epic SDN-3198: [4.12] Hypershift: Changes to move networking operators to hosted control plane

Epic Goal

  • To improve debug-ability of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To verify the stability of of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To introduce a EgressIP reach-ability check that will work in hypershift

Why is this important?

  • ovn-k is supposed to be GA in 4.12. We need to make sure it is stable, we know the limitations and we are able to debug it similar to the self hosted cluster.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. This will need consultation with the people working on HyperShift

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SDN-2589

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
Feature OCPSTRAT-598: The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
Epic USHIFT-228: The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
Story USHIFT-219: The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Incomplete Features

When this image was assembled, these features were not yet completed. Therefore, only the Jira Cards included here are part of this release

Feature OCPPLAN-4577: The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Only Red Hat employees and contractors)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Only Red Hat employees and contractors)
Epic MIXEDARCH-26: OLM support for node selection

OLM would have to support a mechanism like podAffinity which allows multiple architecture values to be specified which enables it to pin operators to the matching architecture worker nodes

Ref: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1014

 

Task OPRUN-2690: [downstream] bring Subscription API and OLM controller changes to the downstream

Cut a new release of the OLM API and update OLM API dependency version (go.mod) in OLM package; then
Bring the upstream changes from OLM-2674 to the downstream olm repo.

A/C:

 - New OLM API version release
 - OLM API dependency updated in OLM Project
 - OLM Subscription API changes  downstreamed
 - OLM Controller changes  downstreamed
 - Changes manually tested on Cluster Bot

Epic MGMT-8890: [kube-api] Integration of multiple architectures support / heterogeneous clusters

Epic Goal

  • Enabling integration of single hub cluster to install both ARM and x86 spoke clusters
  • Enabling support for heterogeneous OCP clusters
  • document requirements deployment flows
  • support in disconnected environment

Why is this important?

  • clients request

Scenarios

  1. Users manage both ARM and x86 machines, we should not require to have two different hub clusters
  2. Users manage a mixed architecture clusters without requirement of all the nodes to be of the same architecture

Acceptance Criteria

  • Process is well documented
  • we are able to install in a disconnected environment
Story MGMT-11348: Assisted images should be multiarch

We have a set of images

  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-agent:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-controller:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer:latest

that should become multiarch images. This should be done both in upstream and downstream.

As a reference, we have built internally those images as multiarch and made them available as

  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

They can be consumed by the Assisted Serivce pod via the following env

    - name: AGENT_DOCKER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
    - name: CONTROLLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
    - name: INSTALLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest
Feature OCPPLAN-6007: OpenShift Core Networking Improvements

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

  • Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
  • Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

  • Core Networking Stability
  • Core Networking Performance and Scale
  • Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
  • Core Networking UX (Observability)
  • Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

  • Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
  • SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
  • Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

  • CNV
  • Service Mesh
  • CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?
Epic NE-682: Capture Metrics and Telemetry Associated with Use of Routes and Shards

Goal: Provide queryable metrics and telemetry for cluster routes and sharding in an OpenShift cluster.

Problem: Today we test OpenShift performance and scale with best-guess or anecdotal evidence for the number of routes that our customers use. Best practices for a large number of routes in a cluster is to shard, however we have no visibility with regard to if and how customers are using sharding.

Why is this important? These metrics will inform our performance and scale testing, documented cluster limits, and how customers are using sharding for best practice deployments.

Dependencies (internal and external):

Prioritized epics + deliverables (in scope / not in scope):

Not in scope:

Estimate (XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL):

Previous Work:

Open questions:

Acceptance criteria:

Epic Done Checklist:

  • CI - CI Job & Automated tests: <link to CI Job & automated tests>
  • Release Enablement: <link to Feature Enablement Presentation> 
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR orf GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
  • Notes for Done Checklist: 
    • Adding links to the above checklist with multiple teams contributing; select a meaningful reference for this Epic.
    • Checklist added to each Epic in the description, to be filled out as phases are completed - tracking progress towards “Done” for the Epic.
Story CFE-478: As a developer I want to support exporting of additional metrics from Cluster Ingress Operator

Description:

As described in the Design Doc, the following information is needed to be exported from Cluster Ingress Operator:

  • Number of routes/shard

Design 2 will be implemented as part of this story.

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for exporting the above mentioned metrics by Cluster Ingress Operator
Story CFE-551: As a developer I want to support sending of metrics from OpenShift clusters to Red Hat premises for Telemeter by allowlisting metrics on the cluster side

Description:

As described in the Metrics to be sent via telemetry section of the Design Doc, the following metrics is needed to be sent from OpenShift cluster to Red Hat premises:

  • Minimum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:min  : min(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the minimum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Maximum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:max  : max(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the maximum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Average Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:avg  : avg(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the average value of Routes per Shard.
  • Median Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:median  : quantile(0.5, route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the median value of Routes per Shard.
  • Number of Routes summed by TLS Termination type
    • Recording Rule – cluster:openshift_route_info:tls_termination:sum : sum (openshift_route_info) by (tls_termination)
    • Gives the number of Routes for each tls_termination value. The possible values for tls_termination are edge, passthrough and reencrypt. 

The metrics should be allowlisted on the cluster side.

The steps described in Sending metrics via telemetry are needed to be followed. Specifically step 5.

Depends on CFE-478.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for sending the above mentioned metrics from OpenShift clusters to the Red Hat premises by allowlisting metrics on the cluster side
Feature OCPPLAN-7744: Declarative Index Config

This is a epic bucket for all activities surrounding the creation of declarative approach to release and maintain OLM catalogs.

Epic OPRUN-2211: Operator Authors have a clean veneer for releasing bundles (File based config/declarative config)

Epic Goal

  • Allow Operator Authors to easily change the layout of the update graph in a single location so they can version/maintain/release it via git and have more approachable controls about graph vertices than today's replaces, skips and/or skipRange taxonomy
  • Allow Operators authors to have control over channel and bundle channel membership

Why is this important?

  • The imperative catalog maintenance approach so far with opm is being moved to a declarative format (OLM-2127 and OLM-1780) moving away from bundle-level controls but the update graph properties are still attached to a bundle
  • We've received feedback from the RHT internal developer community that maintaining and reasoning about the graph in the context of a single channel is still too hard, even with visualization tools
  • making the update graph easily changeable is important to deliver on some of the promises of declarative index configuration
  • The current interface for declarative index configuration still relies on skips, skipRange and replaces to shape the graph on a per-bundle level - this is too complex at a certain point with a lot of bundles in channels, we need to something at the package level

Scenarios

  1. An Operator author wants to release a new version replacing the latest version published previously
  2. After additional post-GA testing an Operator author wants to establish a new update path to an existing released version from an older, released version
  3. After finding a bug post-GA an Operator author wants to temporarily remove a known to be problematic update path
  4. An automated system wants to push a bundle inbetween an existing update path as a result of an Operator (base) image rebuild (Freshmaker use case)
  5. A user wants to take a declarative graph definition and turn it into a graphical image for visually ensuring the graph looks like they want
  6. An Operator author wants to promote a certain bundle to an additional / different channel to indicate progress in maturity of the operator.

Acceptance Criteria

  • The declarative format has to be user readable and terse enough to make quick modifications
  • The declarative format should be machine writeable (Freshmaker)
  • The update graph is declared and modified in a text based format aligned with the declarative config
  • it has to be possible to add / removes edges at the leave of the graph (releasing/unpublishing a new version)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new vertices between existing edges (releasing/retracting a new update path)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new edges in between existing vertices (releasing/unpublishing a version inbetween, freshmaker user case)
  • it has to be possible to change the channel member ship of a bundle after it's published (channel promotion)
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • it has to be possible to add additional metadata later to implement OLM-2087 and OLM-259 if required

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-2127)

Previous Work:

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-1780)

Related work

Open questions:

  1. What other manipulation scenarios are required?
    1. Answer: deprecation of content in the spirit of OLM-2087
    2. Answer: cross-channel update hints as described in OLM-2059 if that implementation requires it

 

When working on this Epic, it's important to keep in mind this other potentially related Epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OLM-2276

 

Story OPRUN-2726: downstream opm server change to use pre-existent cache

Jira Description

As an OPM maintainer, I want to downstream the PR for (OCP 4.12 ) and backport it to OCP 4.11 so that IIB will NOT be impacted by the changes when it upgrades the OPM version to use the next/future opm upstream release (v1.25.0).

Summary / Background

IIB(the downstream service that manages the indexes) uses the upstream version and if they bump the OPM version to the next/future (v1.25.0) release with this change before having the downstream images updated then: the process to manage the indexes downstream will face issues and it will impact the distributions. 

Acceptance Criteria

  • The changes in the PR are available for the releases which uses FBC -> OCP 4.11, 4.12

Definition of Ready

  • PRs merged into downstream OCP repos branches 4.11/4.12

Definition of Done

  • We checked that the downstream images are with the changes applied (i.e.: we can try to verify in the same way that we checked if the changes were in the downstream for the fix OLM-2639 )
Story OPRUN-2753: (downstream) Feature: opm alpha render-veneer support for pipe stdin

enhance the veneer rendering to be able to read the input veneer data from stdin, via a pipe, in a manner similar to https://dev.to/napicella/linux-pipes-in-golang-2e8j

then the command could be used in a manner similar to many k8s examples like

```shell
opm alpha render-veneer semver -o yaml < infile > outfile
```

Upstream issue link: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-registry/issues/1011

Feature OCPPLAN-7878: NetEdge - Maintainability and Debugability & Tech Backlog

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

  1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
  2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
  3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.

Relevant links:

Epic NE-1072: [Tech Debt] Default HAProxy maxconn value to 50000 for OCP 4.12

Epic Goal

  • Change the default value for the spec.tuningOptions.maxConnections field in the IngressController API, which configures the HAProxy maxconn setting, to 50000 (fifty thousand).

Why is this important?

  • The maxconn setting constrains the number of simultaneous connections that HAProxy accepts. Beyond this limit, the kernel queues incoming connections. 
  • Increasing maxconn enables HAProxy to queue incoming connections intelligently.  In particular, this enables HAProxy to respond to health probes promptly while queueing other connections as needed.
  • The default setting of 20000 has been in place since OpenShift 3.5 was released in April 2017 (see BZ#1405440, commit, RHBA-2017:0884). 
  • Hardware capabilities have increased over time, and the current default is too low for typical modern machine sizes. 
  • Increasing the default setting improves HAProxy's performance at an acceptable cost in the common case. 

Scenarios

  1. As a cluster administrator who is installing OpenShift on typical hardware, I want OpenShift router to be tuned appropriately to take advantage of my hardware's capabilities.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI is passing. 
  • The new default setting is clearly documented. 
  • A release note informs cluster administrators of the change to the default setting. 

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. None.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. The  haproxy-max-connections-tuning enhancement made maxconn configurable without changing the default.  The enhancement document details the tradeoffs in terms of memory for various settings of nbthreads and maxconn with various numbers of routes. 

Open questions::

  1. ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

 

Epic NE-1067: [Tech Debt] Create E2E testing for DNS local endpoint preference

OCP/Telco Definition of Done

Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • This regression is a major performance and stability issue and it has happened once before.

Drawbacks

  • The E2E test may be complex due to trying to determine what DNS pods are responding to DNS requests. This is straightforward using the chaos plugin.

Scenarios

  • CI Testing

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. SDN Team

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. N/A

Open questions::

  1. Where do these E2E test go? SDN Repo? DNS Repo?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
Story NE-1066: Add chaos plugin to DNS to support DNS Endpoint identification.

Enable the chaos plugin https://coredns.io/plugins/chaos/ in our CoreDNS configuration so that we can use a DNS query to easily identify what DNS pods are responding to our requests.

Feature OCPPLAN-8030: Console: Customer Happiness (RFEs) for 4.8-4.12

Feature Overview

  • This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary
  • Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

 

Goals

  • This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature
  • …

 

Requirements

  • This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

 

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

  • Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
  • Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
  • ...

 

Questions to answer…

  • ...

 

Out of Scope

  • …

 

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

 

Assumptions

  • ...

 

Customer Considerations

  • ...

 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?  
  • New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?
Epic CONSOLE-3193: The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
Story CONSOLE-3252: Inform OCP users that the platform is performing an upgrade

When OCP is performing cluster upgrade user should be notified about this fact.

There are two possibilities how to surface the cluster upgrade to the users:

  • Display a console notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Global notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Have an alert firing for all the users of OCP stating the cluster is undergoing an upgrade. 

 

AC:

  • Console-operator will create a ConsoleNotification CR when the cluster is being upgraded. Once the upgrade is done console-operator will remote that CR. These are the three statuses based on which we are determining if the cluster is being upgraded.
  • Add unit tests

 

Note: We need to decide if we want to distinguish this particular notification by a different color? ccing Ali Mobrem 

 

Created from: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RFE-3024

Story CONSOLE-3244: Make status.HostIP for Pods visible in the OCP Web Console

As a developer, I want to make status.HostIP for Pods visible in the Pod details page of the OCP Web Console. Currently there is no way to view the node IP for a Pod in the OpenShift Web Console.  When viewing a Pod in the console, the field status.HostIP is not visible.

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Make pod's HostIP field visible in the pod details page, similarly to PodIP field
Story CONSOLE-3067: Adding Rollout Restart function to the OpenShift Console

As a console user I want to have option to:

  • Restart Deployment
  • Retry latest DeploymentConfig if it failed

 

For Deployments we will add the 'Restart rollout' action button. This action will PATCH the Deployment object's 'spec.template.metadata.annotations' block, by adding 'openshift.io/restartedAt: <actual-timestamp>' annotation. This will restart the deployment, by creating a new ReplicaSet.

  • action is disabled if:
    • Deployment is paused

 

For DeploymentConfig we will add 'Retry rollout' action button.  This action will PATCH the latest revision of ReplicationController object's 'metadata.annotations' block by setting 'openshift.io/deployment/phase: "New"' and removing openshift.io/deployment.cancelled and openshift.io/deployment.status-reason.

  • action is enabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Failed phase
  • action is disabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Complete phase
    • DeploymentConfig does not have any rollouts
    • DeploymentConfigs is paused

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add the 'Restart rollout' action button for the Deployment resource to both action menu and kebab menu
  • Add the 'Retry rollout' action button for the DeploymentConfig resource to both action menu and kebab menu

 

BACKGROUND:

OpenShift console will be updated to allow rollout restart deployment from the console itself.

Currently, from the OpenShift console, for the resource “deploymentconfigs” we can only start and pause the rollout, and for the resource “deployment” we can only resume the rollout. None of the resources (deployment & deployment config) has this option to restart the rollout. So, that is the reason why the customer wants this functionality to perform the same action from the CLI as well as the OpenShift console.

The customer wants developers who are not fluent with the oc tool and terminal utilities, can use the console instead of the terminal to restart deployment, just like we use to do it through CLI using the command “oc rollout restart deploy/<deployment-name>“.
Usually when developers change the config map that deployment uses they have to restart pods. Currently, the developers have to use the oc rollout restart deployment command. The customer wants the functionality to get this button/menu to perform the same action from the console as well.

Design
Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i-jGtQGaA0OI4CYh8DH5BBIVbocIu_dxNt3vwWmPZdw/edit

Feature OCPSTRAT-173: OC mirror enhancements

OC mirror is GA product as of Openshift 4.11 .

The goal of this feature is to solve any future customer request for new features or capabilities in OC mirror 

Epic CFE-538: oc mirror IBM CloudPak support

Epic Goal

  • Mirror to mirror operations and custom mirroring flows required by IBM CloudPak catalog management

Why is this important?

  • IBM needs additional customization around the actual mirroring of images to enable CloudPaks to fully adopt OLM-style operator packaging and catalog management
  • IBM CloudPaks introduce additional compute architectures, increasing the download volume by 2/3rds to day, we need the ability to effectively filter non-required image versions of OLM operator catalogs during filtering for other customers that only require a single or a subset of the available image architectures
  • IBM CloudPaks regularly run on older OCP versions like 4.8 which require additional work to be able to read the mirrored catalog produced by oc mirror

Scenarios

  1. Customers can use the oc utility and delegate the actual image mirror step to another tool
  2. Customers can mirror between disconnected registries using the oc utility
  3. The oc utility supports filtering manifest lists in the context of multi-arch images according to the sparse manifest list proposal in the distribution spec

Acceptance Criteria

  • Customers can use the oc utility to mirror between two different air-gapped environments
  • Customers can specify the desired computer architectures and oc mirror will create sparse manifest lists in the target registry as a result

Dependencies (internal and external)

Previous Work:

  1. WRKLDS-369
  2. Disconnected Mirroring Improvement Proposal

Related Work:

  1. https://github.com/opencontainers/distribution-spec/pull/310
  2. https://github.com/distribution/distribution/pull/3536
  3. https://docs.google.com/document/d/10ozLoV7sVPLB8msLx4LYamooQDSW-CAnLiNiJ9SER2k/edit?usp=sharing
Feature OCPSTRAT-402: The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
Epic CONSOLE-3234: Phase 3 - Pre-Work Unite Consoles (ACM, OCP)

Pre-Work Objectives

Since some of our requirements from the ACM team will not be available for the 4.12 timeframe, the team should work on anything we can get done in the scope of the console repo so that when the required items are available in 4.13, we can be more nimble in delivering GA content for the Unified Console Epic.

Overall GA Key Objective
Providing our customers with a single simplified User Experience(Hybrid Cloud Console)that is extensible, can run locally or in the cloud, and is capable of managing the fleet to deep diving into a single cluster. 
Why customers want this?

  1. Single interface to accomplish their tasks
  2. Consistent UX and patterns
  3. Easily accessible: One URL, one set of credentials

Why we want this?

  • Shared code -  improve the velocity of both teams and most importantly ensure consistency of the experience at the code level
  • Pre-built PF4 components
  • Accessibility & i18n
  • Remove barriers for enabling ACM

Phase 2 Goal: Productization of the united Console 

  1. Enable user to quickly change context from fleet view to single cluster view
    1. Add Cluster selector with “All Cluster” Option. “All Cluster” = ACM
    2. Shared SSO across the fleet
    3. Hub OCP Console can connect to remote clusters API
    4. When ACM Installed the user starts from the fleet overview aka “All Clusters”
  2. Share UX between views
    1. ACM Search —> resource list across fleet -> resource details that are consistent with single cluster details view
    2. Add Cluster List to OCP —> Create Cluster
Story CONSOLE-3125: Disable unsupported clusters in cluster dropdown

As a developer I would like to disable clusters like *KS that we can't support for multi-cluster (for instance because we can't authenticate). The ManagedCluster resource has a vendor label that we can use to know if the cluster is supported.

cc Ali Mobrem Sho Weimer Jakub Hadvig 

UPDATE: 9/20/22 : we want an allow-list with OpenShift, ROSA, ARO, ROKS, and  OpenShiftDedicated

Acceptance criteria:

  • Investigate if console-operator should pass info about which cluster are supported and unsupported to the frontend
  • Unsupported clusters should not appear in the cluster dropdown
  • Unsupported clusters based off
    • defined vendor label
    • non 4.x ocp clusters
Feature OCPSTRAT-507: RHCOS based on RHEL 9.2

Feature Overview

RHEL CoreOS should be updated to RHEL 9.2 sources to take advantage of newer features, hardware support, and performance improvements.

 

Requirements

  • RHEL 9.x sources for RHCOS builds starting with OCP 4.13 and RHEL 9.2.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

(Optional) Use Cases

  • 9.2 Preview via Layering No longer necessary assuming we stay the course of going all in on 9.2

Assumptions

  • ...

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?
Epic OKD-4: MVP: Get a sprintly release of OKD running on SCOS

PROBLEM

We would like to improve our signal for RHEL9 readiness by increasing internal engineering engagement and external partner engagement on our community OpehShift offering, OKD.

PROPOSAL

Adding OKD to run on SCOS (a CentOS stream for CoreOS) brings the community offering closer to what a partner or an internal engineering team might expect on OCP.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Image has been switched/included: 

OKD-23

DEPENDENCIES

The SCOS build payload.

RELATED RESOURCES

OKD+SCOS proposal: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_Xa9Z4tSqB7U2No7WA0KXb3lDIngNaQpS504ZLrCmg8/edit#slide=id.p

OKD+SCOS work draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cuWOXhATexNLWGKLjaOcVF4V95JJjP1E3UmQ2kDVzsA/edit

 

Acceptance Criteria

A stable OKD on SCOS is built and available to the community sprintly.

 

Story OKD-49: Update multus script to recognize scos

This comes up when installing ipi-on-aws on arm64 with the custom payload build at quay.io/aleskandrox/okd-release:4.12.0-0.okd-centos9-full-rebuild-arm64 that is using scos as machine-content-os image

 

```

[root@ip-10-0-135-176 core]# crictl logs c483c92e118d8
2022-08-11T12:19:39+00:00 [cnibincopy] FATAL ERROR: Unsupported OS ID=scos
```

 

The probable fix has to land on https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/blob/master/bindata/network/multus/multus.yaml#L41-L53

Feature OCPSTRAT-591: HyperShift Core Component Readiness for GA - Part I

Overview 

HyperShift came to life to serve multiple goals, some are main near-term, some are secondary that serve well long-term. 

Main Goals for hosted control planes (HyperShift)

  • Optimize OpenShift for Cost/footprint/ which improves our competitive stance against the *KSes
  • Establish separation of concerns which makes it more resilient for SRE to manage their workload clusters (be it security, configuration management, etc).
  • Simplify and enhance multi-cluster management experience especially since multi-cluster is becoming an industry need nowadays. 

Secondary Goals

HyperShift opens up doors to penetrate the market. HyperShift enables true hybrid (CP and Workers decoupled, mixed IaaS, mixed Arch,...). An architecture that opens up more options to target new opportunities in the cloud space. For more details on this one check: Hosted Control Planes (aka HyperShift) Strategy [Live Document]

 

Hosted Control Planes (HyperShift) Map 

To bring hosted control planes to our customers, we need the means to ship it. Today MCE is how HyperShift shipped, and installed so that customers can use it. There are two main customers for hosted-control-planes: 

 

  • Self-managed: In that case, Red Hat would provide hosted control planes as a service that is managed and SREed by the customer for their tenants (hence “self”-managed). In this management model, our external customers are the direct consumers of the multi-cluster control plane as a servie. Once MCE is installed, they can start to self-service dedicated control planes. 

 

  • Managed: This is OpenShift as a managed service, today we only “manage” the CP, and share the responsibility for other system components, more info here. To reduce management costs incurred by service delivery organizations which translates to operating profit (by reducing variable costs per control-plane), as well as to improve user experience, lower platform overhead (allow customers to focus mostly on writing applications and not concern themselves with infrastructure artifacts), and improve the cluster provisioning experience. HyperShift is shipped via MCE, and delivered to Red Hat managed SREs (same consumption route). However, for managed services, additional tooling needs to be refactored to support the new provisioning path. Furthermore, unlike self-managed where customers are free to bring their own observability stack, Red Hat managed SREs need to observe the managed fleet to ensure compliance with SLOs/SLIs/…

 

If you have noticed, MCE is the delivery mechanism for both management models. The difference between managed and self-managed is the consumer persona. For self-managed, it's the customer SRE for managed its the RH SRE. 

High-level Requirements

For us to ship HyperShift in the product (as hosted control planes) in either management model, there is a necessary readiness checklist that we need to satisfy. Below are the high-level requirements needed before GA: 

 

  • Hosted control planes fits well with our multi-cluster story (with MCE)
  • Hosted control planes APIs are stable for consumption  
  • Customers are not paying for control planes/infra components.  
  • Hosted control planes has an HA and a DR story
  • Hosted control planes is in parity with top-level add-on operators 
  • Hosted control planes reports metrics on usage/adoption
  • Hosted control planes is observable  
  • HyperShift as a backend to managed services is fully unblocked.

 

Please also have a look at our What are we missing in Core HyperShift for GA Readiness? doc. 

Hosted control planes fits well with our multi-cluster story

Multi-cluster is becoming an industry need today not because this is where trend is going but because it’s the only viable path today to solve for many of our customer’s use-cases. Below is some reasoning why multi-cluster is a NEED:

 

 

As a result, multi-cluster management is a defining category in the market where Red Hat plays a key role. Today Red Hat solves for multi-cluster via RHACM and MCE. The goal is to simplify fleet management complexity by providing a single pane of glass to observe, secure, police, govern, configure a fleet. I.e., the operand is no longer one cluster but a set, a fleet of clusters. 

HyperShift logically centralized architecture, as well as native separation of concerns and superior cluster lifecyle management experience, makes it a great fit as the foundation of our multi-cluster management story. 

Thus the following stories are important for HyperShift: 

  • When lifecycling OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) on any of the supported providers from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin):
  • I want to be able to use a consistent UI so I can manage and operate (observe, govern,...) a fleet of clusters.
  • I want to specify HA constraints (e.g., deploy my clusters in different regions) while ensuring acceptable QoS (e.g., latency boundaries) to ensure/reduce any potential downtime for my workloads. 
  • When operating OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) on any of the supported provider from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin):
  • I want to be able to backup any critical data so I am able to restore them in case of hosting service cluster (management cluster) failure. 

Refs:

Hosted control planes APIs are stable for consumption.

 

HyperShift is the core engine that will be used to provide hosted control-planes for consumption in managed and self-managed. 

 

Main user story:  When life cycling clusters as a cluster service consumer via HyperShift core APIs, I want to use a stable/backward compatible API that is less susceptible to future changes so I can provide availability guarantees. 

 

Ref: What are we missing in Core HyperShift for GA Readiness?

Customers are not paying for control planes/infra components. 

 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumptions: 

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

HyperShift - proposed cuts from data plane

HyperShift has an HA and a DR story

When operating OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin) I want to be able to migrate CPs from one hosting service cluster to another:

  • as means for disaster recovery in the case of total failure
  • so that scaling pressures on a management cluster can be mitigated or a management cluster can be decommissioned.

More information: 

 

Hosted control planes reports metrics on usage/adoption

To understand usage patterns and inform our decision making for the product. We need to be able to measure adoption and assess usage.

See Hosted Control Planes (aka HyperShift) Strategy [Live Document]

Hosted control plane is observable  

Whether it's managed or self-managed, it’s pertinent to report health metrics to be able to create meaningful Service Level Objectives (SLOs), alert of failure to meet our availability guarantees. This is especially important for our managed services path. 

HyperShift is in parity with top-level add-on operators

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPPLAN-8901 

Unblock HyperShift as a backend to managed services

HyperShift for managed services is a strategic company goal as it improves usability, feature, and cost competitiveness against other managed solutions, and because managed services/consumption-based cloud services is where we see the market growing (customers are looking to delegate platform overhead). 

 

We should make sure our SD milestones are unblocked by the core team. 

 

Note 

This feature reflects HyperShift core readiness to be consumed. When all related EPICs and stories in this EPIC are complete HyperShift can be considered ready to be consumed in GA form. This does not describe a date but rather the readiness of core HyperShift to be consumed in GA form NOT the GA itself.

- GA date for self-managed will be factoring in other inputs such as adoption, customer interest/commitment, and other factors. 
- GA dates for ROSA-HyperShift are on track, tracked in milestones M1-7 (have a look at https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPPLAN-5771) 

Epic AUTH-310: Separate client certificate trust from the global Hypershift CA

Epic Goal*

The goal is to split client certificate trust chains from the global Hypershift root CA.

 
Why is this important? (mandatory)

This is important to:

  • assure a workload can be run on any kind of OCP flavor
  • reduce the blast radius in case of a sensitive material leak
  • separate trust to allow more granular control over client certificate authentication

 
Scenarios (mandatory) 

Provide details for user scenarios including actions to be performed, platform specifications, and user personas.  

  1. I would like to be able to run my workloads on any OpenShift-like platform.
    My workloads allow components to authenticate using client certificates based
    on a trust bundle that I am able to retrieve from the cluster.
  1. I don't want my users to have access to any CA bundle that would allow them
    to trust a random certificate from the cluster for client certificate authentication.

 
Dependencies (internal and external) (mandatory)

Hypershift team needs to provide us with code reviews and merge the changes we are to deliver

Contributing Teams(and contacts) (mandatory) 

  • Development - OpenShift Auth, Hypershift
  • Documentation -OpenShift Auth Docs team
  • QE - OpenShift Auth QE
  • PX - I have no idea what PX is
  • Others - others

Acceptance Criteria (optional)

The serviceaccount CA bundle automatically injected to all pods cannot be used to authenticate any client certificate generated by the control-plane.

Drawbacks or Risk (optional)

Risk: there is a throbbing time pressure as this should be delivered before first stable Hypershift release

Done - Checklist (mandatory)

  • CI Testing -  Basic e2e automationTests are merged and completing successfully
  • Documentation - Content development is complete.
  • QE - Test scenarios are written and executed successfully.
  • Technical Enablement - Slides are complete (if requested by PLM)
  • Engineering Stories Merged
  • All associated work items with the Epic are closed
  • Epic status should be “Release Pending” 
Feature OCPSTRAT-845: [Tech Preview] Proper MCO State Reporting

Feature Overview (aka. Goal Summary)  

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

Some customer cases have revealed scenarios where the MCO state reporting is misleading and therefore could be unreliable to base decisions and automation on.

In addition to correcting some incorrect states, the MCO will be enhanced for a more granular view of update rollouts across machines.

Epic MCO-452: [tech-preview] Proper state reporting when the MCO changes state

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

For this epic, "state" means "what is the MCO doing?" – so the goal here is to try to make sure that it's always known what the MCO is doing. 

This includes: 

  • Conditions
  • Some Logging 
  • Possibly Some Events 

While this probably crosses a little bit into the "status" portion of certain MCO objects, as some state is definitely recorded there, this probably shouldn't turn into a "better status reporting" epic.  I'm interpreting "status" to mean "how is it going" so status is maybe a "detail attached to a state". 

 

Exploration here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j6Qea98aVP12kzmPbR_3Y-3-meJQBf0_K6HxZOkzbNk/edit?usp=sharing

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/17qYml7CETIaDmcEO-6OGQGNO0d7HtfyU7W4OMA6kTeM/edit?usp=sharing

 

Story MCO-400: RFE: clarify "current" for MachineConfigPool status.configuration

The current property description is:

configuration represents the current MachineConfig object for the machine config pool.

But in a 4.12.0-ec.4 cluster, the actual semantics seem to be something closer to "the most recent rendered config that we completely leveled on". We should at least update the godocs to be more specific about the intended semantics. And perhaps consider adjusting the semantics?

Complete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were completed when this image was assembled

Epic BUILD-529: Kubernetes 1.25 Rebases

Epic Goal

  • Update OpenShift components that are owned by the Builds + Jenkins Team to use Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Our components need to be updated to ensure that they are using the latest bug/CVE fixes, features, and that they are API compatible with other OpenShift components.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Existing CI/CD tests must be passing
Epic CCXDEV-9285: IO maintenance OCP 4.12

This is epic tracks "business as usual" requirements / enhancements / bug fixing of Insights Operator.

Bug OCPBUGS-2915: InsightsRecommendationActive should link cluster-specific page

Today the links point at a rule-scoped page, but that page lacks information about recommended resolution.  You can click through by cluster ID to your specific cluster and get that recommendation advice, but it would be more convenient and less confusing for customers if we linked directly to the cluster-scoped recommendation page.

We can implement by updating the template here to be:

fmt.Sprintf("https://console.redhat.com/openshift/insights/advisor/clusters/%s?first=%s%%7C%s", clusterID, ruleIDStr, rec.ErrorKey)

or something like that.

 

unknowns

request is clear, solution/implementation to be further clarified

Epic CONSOLE-3059: OCP 4.11 - Dynamic Plugins Epic

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

  •  
Story CONSOLE-3083: Add missing ts-doc for dynamic plugin SDK components

This story only covers API components. We will create a separate story for other utility functions.

Today we are generating documentation for Console's Dynamic Plugin SDK in
frontend/packages/dynamic-plugin-sdk. We are missing ts-doc for a set of hooks and components.

We are generating the markdown from the dynamic-plugin-sdk using

yarn generate-doc

Here is the list of the API that the dynamic-plugin-sdk is exposing:

https://gist.github.com/spadgett/0ddefd7ab575940334429200f4f7219a

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add missing jsdocs for the API that dynamic-plugin-sdk exposes

Out of Scope:

  • This does not include work for integrating the API docs into the OpenShift docs
  • This does not cover other public utilities, only components.
Epic CONSOLE-3174: OCP 4.12 - Dynamic Plugins Epic -GA

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

Story CONSOLE-3224: Provide an explanation why a dynamic plugin has a status of `Failed`

During the development of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CONSOLE-3062, it was determined additional information is needed in order to assist a user when troubleshooting a Failed plugin (see https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11664#issuecomment-1159024959). As it stands today, there is no data available to the console to relay to the user regarding why the plugin Failed. Presumably, a message should be added to NotLoadedDynamicPlugin to address this gap.

 

AC: Add `message` property to NotLoadedDynamicPluginInfo type.

Story CONSOLE-3336: Make dynamic plugin dependencies optional

To align with https://github.com/openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk, plugin metadata field dependencies as well as the @console/pluginAPI entry contained within should be made optional.

If a plugin doesn't declare the @console/pluginAPI dependency, the Console release version check should be skipped for that plugin.

Story CONSOLE-3183: Improve/Fix 'console.dashboards/overview/detail/item' Extension

The extension `console.dashboards/overview/detail/item` doesn't constrain the content to fit the card.

The details-card has an expectation that a <dd> item will be the last item (for spacing between items). Our static details-card items use a component called 'OverviewDetailItem'. This isn't enforced in the extension and can cause undesired padding issues if they just do whatever they want.

I feel our approach here should be making the extension take the props of 'OverviewDetailItem' where 'children' is the new 'component'.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Deprecate the old extension (in docs, with date/stamp)
  • Make a new extension that applies a stricter type
  • Include this new extension next to the old one (with the error boundary around it)
Story CONSOLE-3188: Alert users on Console plugins page when console operator `spec.managementState` is `Unmanaged`

We should have a global notification or the `Console plugins` page (e.g., k8s/cluster/operator.openshift.io~v1~Console/cluster/console-plugins) should alert users when console operator `spec.managementState` is `Unmanaged` as changes to `enabled` for plugins will have no effect.

Story CONSOLE-3186: Add shared-plugin to the SDK Packages tables docs

`@openshift-console/plugin-shared` (NPM) is a package that will contain shared components that can be upversioned separately by the Plugins so they can keep core compatibility low but upversion and support more shared components as we need them.

This isn't documented today. We need to do that.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Add a note in the "SDK packages" section of the README about the existence of this package and it's purpose
    • The purpose of being a static utility delivery library intended not to be tied to OpenShift Console versions and compatible with multiple version of OpenShift Console
Story CONSOLE-3069: Promote ConsolePlugins API version to v1

Currently the ConsolePlugins API version is v1alpha1. Since we are going GA with dynamic plugins we should be creating a v1 version.

This would require updates in following repositories:

  1. openshift/api (add the v1 version and generate a new CRD)
  2. openshift/client-go (picku the changes in the openshift/api repo and generate clients & informers for the new v1 version)
  3. openshift/console-operator repository will using both the new v1 version and v1alpha1 in code and manifests folder.

AC:

  • both v1 and v1alpha1 ConsolePlugins should be passed to the console-config.yaml when the plugins are enabled and present on the cluster.

 

NOTE: This story does not include the conversion webhook change which will be created as a follow on story

Story CONSOLE-3164: Move main nav components to console-app package

Move `frontend/public/components/nav` to `packages/console-app/src/components/nav` and address any issues resulting from the move.

There will be some expected lint errors relating to cyclical imports. These will require some refactoring to address.

Story CONSOLE-3167: Remove static plugin nav extensions

We neither use nor support static plugin nav extensions anymore so we should remove the API in the static plugin SDK and get rid of related cruft in our current nav components.

 

AC: Remove static plugin nav extensions code. Check the navigation code for any references to the old API.

Story CONSOLE-3140: Expose ResourceIcon to dynamic-plugin-sdk

Following https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C011BL0FEKZ/p1650640804532309, it would be useful for us (network observability team) to have access to ResourceIcon in dynamic-plugin-sdk.

Currently ResourceLink is exported but not ResourceIcon

 

AC:

  • Require the ResourceIcon  from public to dynamic-plugin-sdk
  • Add the component to the dynamic-demo-plugin
  • Add a CI test to check for the ResourceIcon component

 

Story CONSOLE-3181: Deprecate useAccessReviewAllowed and useSafetyFirst

Based on API review CONSOLE-3145, we have decided to deprecate the following APIs:

  • useAccessReviewAllowed (use useAccessReview instead)
  • useSafetyFirst

cc Andrew Ballantyne Bryan Florkiewicz 

Currently our `api.md` does not generate docs with "tags" (aka `@deprecated`) – we'll need to add that functionality to the `generate-doc.ts` script. See the code that works for `console-extensions.md`

Bug CONSOLE-3337: When defining more then one proxy in dynamic plugin, only the last one works

when defining two proxy endpoints, 
apiVersion: console.openshift.io/v1alpha1
kind: ConsolePlugin
metadata:
...
name: forklift-console-plugin
spec:
displayName: Console Plugin Template
proxy:

  • alias: forklift-inventory
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-inventory
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service
  • alias: forklift-must-gather-api
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-must-gather-api
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service

service:
basePath: /
I get two proxy endpoints
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
and
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-must-gather-api

but both proxy to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service

e.g.
curl to:
[server url]/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
will point to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service, instead of the `forklift-inventory` service

Story CONSOLE-3276: Expose ErrorBoundary capabilities in the SDK

The console has good error boundary components that are useful for dynamic plugin.
Exposing them will enable the plugins to get the same look and feel of handling react errors as console
The minimum requirement right now is to expose the ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage component from
https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/master/frontend/packages/console-shared/src/components/error/fallbacks/ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage.tsx

Epic CONSOLE-3189: OCP 4.12 - OLM Epic

This epic contains all the OLM related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic
Story CONSOLE-3242: Heterogeneous architecture clusters - Console backend changes

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. kubernetes.io/arch=arm64, kubernetes.io/arch=amd64 etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes.

 

AC: 

  1. Implement logic in the console-operator that will scan though all the nodes and build a set of all the architecture types that the cluster nodes run on and pass it to the console-config.yaml
  2. Add unit and e2e test cases in the console-operator repository.

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

Story CONSOLE-3190: Heterogeneous architecture clusters - Operator Hub filtering

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. `kuberneties.io/arch:arm64`, `kubernetes.io/arch:amd64` etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes. Each operator's PackageManifest contains a labels that indicates whats the operator's supported architecture, e.g.  `operatorframework.io/arch.s390x: supported`. An operator can be supported on multiple architectures

AC:

  1. Implement logic in the console's backend to read the set of architecture types from console-config.yaml and set it as a SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures (Change similar to https://github.com/openshift/console/commit/39aabe171a2e89ed3757ac2146d252d087fdfd33)
  2. In Operator hub render only operators that are support on any given node, based on the SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures field implemented in CONSOLE-3242.

 

OS and arch filtering: https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/2ad4e17d76acbe72171407fc1c66ca4596c8aac4/frontend/packages/operator-lifecycle-manager/src/components/operator-hub/operator-hub-items.tsx#L49-L86

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

Epic CONSOLE-3198: 4.12 Console Dependencies & Tech Debt

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

Story CONSOLE-3091: Remove unused markup after integration of Patterfly's dark mode

As a developer, I want to be able to clean up the css markup after making the css / scss changes required for dark mode and remove any old unused css / scss content. 

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Remove any unused scss / css content after revamping for dark mode
Epic CORS-1774: Enable OpenShift IPI Installer to deploy OCP to a shared VPC in GCP [Tech Preview]

Epic Goal

  • Enable OpenShift IPI Installer to deploy OCP to a shared VPC in GCP.
  • The host project is where the VPC and subnets are defined. Those networks are shared to one or more service projects.
  • Objects created by the installer are created in the service project where possible. Firewall rules may be the only exception.
  • Documentation outlines the needed minimal IAM for both the host and service project.

Why is this important?

  • Shared VPC's are a feature of GCP to enable granular separation of duties for organizations that centrally manage networking but delegate other functions and separation of billing. This is used more often in larger organizations where separate teams manage subsets of the cloud infrastructure. Enterprises that use this model would also like to create IPI clusters so that they can leverage the features of IPI. Currently organizations that use Shared VPC's must use UPI and implement the features of IPI themselves. This is repetative engineering of little value to the customer and an increased risk of drift from upstream IPI over time. As new features are built into IPI, organizations must become aware of those changes and implement them themselves instead of getting them "for free" during upgrades.

Scenarios

  1. Deploy cluster(s) into service project(s) on network(s) shared from a host project.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
Story CORS-2043: [GCP] Passsthrough installer service account to Terraform resources.

User Story:

As a user, I want to be able to:

  • skip creating service accounts in Terraform when using passthrough credentialsMode.
  • pass the installer service account to Terraform to be used as the service account for instances when using passthrough credentialsMode.

so that I can achieve

  • creating an IPI cluster using Shared VPC networks using a pre-created service account with the necessary permissions in the Host Project.

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation
  • Point 1
  • Point 2
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

Detail about what is specifically not being delivered in the story

Engineering Details:

Epic HELM-219: Basic authentication for ProjectHelm Chart repository in helmchartrepositories.helm.openshift.io CRD.

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Basic authentication for Helm Chart repository in helmchartrepositories.helm.openshift.io CRD.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
As of v4.6.9, the HelmChartRepository CRD only supports client TLS authentication through spec.connectionConfig.tlsClientConfig.

3. Why do you need this? (List the business requirements here)
Basic authentication is widely used by many chart repositories managers (Nexus OSS, Artifactory, etc.)
Helm CLI also supports them with the helm repo add command.
https://helm.sh/docs/helm/helm_repo_add/

4. How would you like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)
Probably by extending the CRD:

spec:
connectionConfig:
username: username
password:
secretName: secret-name

The secret namespace should be openshift-config to align with the tlsClientConfig behavior.

5. For each functional requirement listed in question 4, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.
Trying to pull helm charts from remote private chart repositories that has disabled anonymous access and offers basic authentication.
E.g.: https://github.com/sonatype/docker-nexus

Story HELM-342: Implement basic authentication for ODC Helm backend

Owner: Architect:

Story (Required)

As an OCP user I will like to be able to install helm charts from repos added to ODC with basic authentication fields populated

Background (Required)

We need to support helm installs for Repos that have the basic authentication secret name and namespace.

Glossary

Out of scope

Updating the ProjectHelmChartRepository CRD, already done in diff story
Supporting the HelmChartRepository CR, this feature will be scoped first to project/namespace scope repos.

In Scope

<Defines what is included in this story>

Approach(Required)

If the new fields for basic auth are set in the repo CR then use those credentials when making API calls to helm to install/upgrade charts. We will error out if user logged in does not have access to the secret referenced by Repo CR. If basic auth fields are not present we assume is not an authenticated repo.

Dependencies

Nonet

Edge Case

NA

Acceptance Criteria

I can list, install and update charts on authenticated repos from ODC
Needs Documentation both upstream and downstream
Needs new unit test covering repo auth

INVEST Checklist

Dependencies identified
Blockers noted and expected delivery timelines set
Design is implementable
Acceptance criteria agreed upon
Story estimated

Legend

Unknown
Verified
Unsatisfied

Epic IR-192: Manifest lists support

Epic Goal

  • Support manifest lists by image streams and the integrated registry. Clients should be able to pull/push manifests lists from/into the integrated registry. They also should be able to import images via `oc import-image` and them pull them from the internal registry.

Why is this important?

  • Manifest lists are becoming more and more popular. Customers want to mirror manifest lists into the registry and be able to pull them by digest.

Scenarios

  1. Manifest lists can be pushed into the integrated registry
  2. Imported manifests list can be pulled from the integrated registry
  3. Image triggers work with manifest lists

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Existing functionality shouldn't change its behavior

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional)

  1. https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/manifestlist/manifestlist-support.md

Open questions

  1. Can we merge creation of images without having the pruner?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
Story IR-259: As an openshift/client-go user I want to be able to specify that an ImageStream tag refers to a manifest list so that I can import all manifests from it

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

  • The ImageStream object should contain a new flag indicating that it refers to a manifest list
  • openshift-controller-manager uses new openshift/api code to import image streams
  • changing `importMode` of an image stream tag triggers a new import (i.e. updates generation in the tag spec)

NOTES

Epic MCO-297: Finish upgrade in place and spike layering-in-hypershift

This is a follow up Epic to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-144, which aimed to get in-place upgrades for Hypershift. This epic aims to capture additional work to focus on using CoreOS/OCP layering into Hypershift, which has benefits such as:

 

 - removing or reducing the need for ignition

 - maintaining feature parity between self-driving and managed OCP models

 - adding additional functionality such as hotfixes

Story MCO-256: MCD: add handling for disruptionless updates

Currently not implemented, and will require the MCD hypershift mode to be adjusted to handle disruptionless upgrades like regular MCD

Story MCO-258: Harden nodepool logic to handle multiple upgrades

Right now in https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1258 you can only perform one upgrade at a time. Multiple upgrades will break due to controller logic

 

Properly create logic to handle manifest creation/updates and deletion, so the logic is more bulletproof

Epic METAL-159: Build Ironic Container Images on top of RHEL9

We plan to build Ironic Container Images using RHEL9 as base image in OCP 4.12

This is required because the ironic components have abandoned support for CentOS Stream 8 and Python 3.6/3.7 upstream during the most recent development cycle that will produce the stable Zed release, in favor of CentOS Stream 9 and Python 3.8/3.9

More info on RHEL8 to RHEL9 transition in OCP can be found at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N8KyDY7KmgUYA9EOtDDQolebz0qi3nhT20IOn4D-xS4

Epic NE-942: Add field in installer to get LB type for AWS

Epic Goal

  • We need the installer to accept a LB type from user and then we could set type of LB in the following object.
    oc get ingress.config.openshift.io/cluster -o yaml
    Then we can fetch info from this object and reconcile the operator to have the NLB changes reflected.

 

This is an API change and we will consider this as a feature request.

Why is this important?

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

 

Scenarios

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. installer
  2. ingress operator

Previous Work (Optional):

 No

Open questions::

N/A

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
Epic OCPRHV-684: CSI driver should refresh credentials automatically

Make sure that the CSI driver automatically updates oVirt credentials when they are updated in OpenShift.

Epic OCPRHV-812: Tests for oVirt Cluster API Provider and CSI Driver

We need tests for the ovirt-csi-driver and the cluster-api-provider-ovirt. These tests help us to

  • minimize bugs,
  • reproduce and fix them faster and
  • pin down current behavior of the driver

Also, having dedicated tests on lower levels with a smaller scope (unit, integration, ...) has the following benefits:

  • fast feedback cycle (local test execution)
  • developer in-code documentation
  • easier onboarding for new contributers
  • lower resource consumption
Epic ODC-4707: The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
Story ODC-6771: Update user in topology and add flow if Quotas has been reached in a namespace

Description

As a user, I would like to be informed in an intuitive way,  when quotas have been reached in a namespace

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show an alert banner on the Topology and add page for this project/namespace when there is a RQ (Resource Quota) / ACRQ (Applied Cluster Resource Quota) issue
    PF guideline: https://www.patternfly.org/v4/components/alert/design-guidelines#using-alerts 
  2. The above alert should have a CTA link to the search page with all RQ, ACRQ and if there is just one show the details page for the same
  3. For RQ, ACRQ list view show one more column called status with details as shown in the project view.

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Story ODC-6772: In topology view, intuitively update user if any of deployment have reached quota limits

Description

As a user, In the topology view, I would like to be updated intuitively if any of the deployments have reached quota limits

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show a yellow border around deployments if any of the deployments have reached the quota limit
  2. For deployments, if there are any errors associated with resource limits or quotas, include a warning alert in the side panel.
    1. If we know resource limits are the cause, include link to Edit resource limits
    2. If we know pod count is the cause, include a link to Edit pod count

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Epic ODC-5387: The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
Epic ODC-5897: Provide ability for admins to hide perspective

Goal

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins to manage the perspectives to meet the ACs below.

Problem:

We have heard the following requests from customers and developer advocates:

  • Some admins do not want to provide access to the Developer Perspective from the console
  • Some admins do not want to provide non-priv users access to the Admin Perspective from the console

Acceptance criteria:

  1. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the admin perspective for non-priv users
  2. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the developer perspective for all users
  3. Be user that User Preferences for individual users behaves appropriately. If only one perspective is available, the perspective switcher is not needed.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Story ODC-6786: Allow the user to hide perspective(s) using a form driven experience

Description

As an admin, I want to be able to use a form driven experience  to hide user perspective(s)

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Add checkboxes with the options
    1. Hide "Administrator" perspective for non-privileged users
    2.  Hide "Developer" perspective for all users
  2. The console configuration CR should be updated as per the selected option

Additional Details:

Story ODC-6783: Extend the console-operator CRD and API for hiding user perspectives

Description

As an admin, I want to hide the admin perspective for non-privileged users or hide the developer perspective for all users

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6730 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447
Story ODC-6784: Provide a code snippet for the console CRD

Description

As an admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to add user perspectives

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add user perspectives

To support the cluster-admin to configure the perspectives correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization of yaml resource (Console CRD).

Customize Perspective Enhancement PR: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1205

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML which supports the admin to add user perspectives

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449
Story ODC-6785: Hide perspective(s) based on customization

Description

As an admin, I want to hide user perspective(s) based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide perspective(s) based on the customization
    1. When the admin perspective is disabled -> we hide the admin perspective for all unprivileged users
    2. When the dev perspective is disabled -> we hide the dev perspective for all users
  2. When all the perspectives are hidden from a user or for all users, show the Admin perspective by default

Additional Details:

Epic ODC-6695: Allow admins to disable the Dev Catalog, or one or more of its sub-catalogs

Problem:

Customers don't want their users to have access to some/all of the items which are available in the Developer Catalog.  The request is to change access for the cluster, not per user or persona.

Goal:

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins easily disable the Developer Catalog, or one or more of the sub catalogs in the Developer Catalog.

Why is it important?

Multiple customer requests.

Acceptance criteria:

  1. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
  2. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to a specific sub-catalog in the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
    1. Builder Images
    2. Templates
    3. Helm Charts
    4. Devfiles
    5. Operator Backed

Notes

We need to consider how this will work with subcatalogs which are installed by operators: VMs, Event Sources, Event Catalogs, Managed Services, Cloud based services

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Story ODC-6778: Extend the console-operator CRD and API for disabling the access to specific sub-catalog(s) in the dev catalog or the complete dev catalog

Description

As an admin, I want to hide/disable access to specific sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or the complete dev catalog for all users across all namespaces.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447
Story ODC-6780: Provide a code snippet for the console CRD

Description

As a cluster-admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to enable sub-catalogs or the entire dev catalog.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add sub-catalog(s)  from the Developer Catalog or the Dev catalog as a whole.

To support the cluster-admin to configure the sub-catalog list correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization yaml resource (Console CRD).

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML, which supports the admin to add sub-catalogs/the whole dev catalog

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449
Story ODC-6779: Hide sub-catalog(s) in the developer catalog or the entire dev catalog based on customization

Description

As an admin, I want to hide sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or hide the developer catalog completely based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide all links to the sub-catalog(s) from the add page, topology actions, empty states, quick search, and the catalog itself
  2. The sub-catalog should show Not found if the user opens the sub-catalog directly
  3. The feature should not be hidden if a sub-catalog option is disabled

Additional Details:

Epic OPRUN-2600: Update OLM to address the security changes coming from PSA in 4.12

Epic Goal

  • Facilitate the transition to for OLM and content to PSA enforcing the `restricted` security profile
  • Use the label synch'er to enforce the required security profile
  • Current content should work out-of-the-box as is
  • Upgrades should not be blocked

Why is this important?

  • PSA helps secure the cluster by enforcing certain security restrictions that the pod must meet to be scheduled
  • 4.12 will enforce the `restricted` profile, which will affect the deployment of operators in `openshift-*` namespaces 

Scenarios

  1. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*`namespace that is not managed by the label syncher -> label should be applied
  2. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*` namespace that has a label asking the label syncher to not reconcile it -> nothing changes

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Done only downstream
  • Transition documentation written and reviewed

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. label syncher (still searching for the link)

Open questions::

  1. Is this only for openshift-* namespaces?

Resources

Stakeholders

  • Daniel S...?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
Story OPRUN-2695: [downstream] OLM controller plug-in for openshift-* namespace labelling

As an admin, I would like openshift-* namespaces with an operator to be labeled with security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true to ensure the continual functioning of operators without manual intervention. The label should only be applied to openshift-* namespaces with an operator (the presence of a ClusterServiceVersion resource) IF the label is not already present. This automation will help smooth functioning of the cluster and avoid frivolous operational events.

Context: As part of the PSA migration period, Openshift will ship with the "label sync'er" - a controller that will automatically adjust PSA security profiles in response to the workloads present in the namespace. We can assume that not all operators (produced by Red Hat, the community or ISVs) will have successfully migrated their deployments in response to upstream PSA changes. The label sync'er will sync, by default, any namespace not prefixed with "openshift-", of which an explicit label (security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true) is required for sync.

A/C:
 - OLM operator has been modified (downstream only) to label any unlabelled "openshift-" namespace in which a CSV has been created
 - If a labeled namespace containing at least one non-copied csv becomes unlabelled, it should be relabelled 
 - The implementation should be done in a way to eliminate or minimize subsequent downstream sync work (it is ok to make slight architectural changes to the OLM operator in the upstream to enable this)

Epic SDE-2222: The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
Story OSD-15099: Expose hosted cluster readiness metric

As a SRE, I want hypershift operator to expose a metric when hosted control plane is ready. 

This should allow SRE to tune (or silence) alerts occurring while the hosted control plane is spinning up. 

 

 

Epic SDE-2659: The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
Story HOSTEDCP-839: Add audit logging sidecars to openshift-apiserver and openshift-oauth-apiserver

The Kube APIServer has a sidecar to output audit logs. We need similar sidecars for other APIServers that run on the control plane side. We also need to pass the same audit log policy that we pass to the KAS to these other API servers.

Epic SDN-3127: [4.12] Network Tooling

This epic tracks network tooling improvements for 4.12

New framework and process should be developed to make sharing network tools with devs, support and customers convenient. We are going to add some tools for ovn troubleshooting before ovn-k goes default, also some tools that we got from customer cases, and some more to help analyze and debug collected logs based on stable must-gather/sosreport format we get now thanks to 4.11 Epic.

Our estimation for this Epic is 1 engineer * 2 Sprints

WHY:
This epic is important to help improve the time it takes our customers and our team to understand an issue within the cluster.
A focus of this epic is to develop tools to quickly allow debugging of a problematic cluster. This is crucial for the engineering team to help us scale. We want to provide a tool to our customers to help lower the cognitive burden to get at a root cause of an issue.

 

Story SDN-3432: OVN-K alerts: add OVN controller disconnection alert

Alert if any of the ovn controllers disconnected for a period of time from the southbound database using metric ovn_controller_southbound_database_connected.

The metric updates every 2 minutes so please be mindful of this when creating the alert.

If the controller is disconnected for 10 minutes, fire an alert.

DoD: Merged to CNO and tested by QE

Epic SDN-3156: Egress IP reachability refactor

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Come up with a consistent way to detect node down on OCP and hypershift. Current mechanism for OCP (probe port 9) does not work for hypershift, meaning, hypershift node down detection will be longer (~40 secs). We should aim to have a common mechanism for both. As well, we should consider alternatives to the probing port 9. Perhaps BFD, or other detection.
  • Get clarification on node down detection times. Some customers have (apparently) asked for detection on the order of 100ms, recommendation is to use multiple Egress IPs, so this may not be a hard requirement. Need clarification from PM/Customers.

Why is this important?

  • …

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. …

Open questions::

  1. …

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
Story SDN-3283: Add sock proxy to cluster-network-operator so egressip can use grpc to reach worker nodes

Add sock proxy to cluster-network-operator so egressip can use grpc to reach worker nodes.
 
With the introduction of grpc as means for determining the state of a given egress node, hypershift should
be able to leverage socks proxy and become able to know the state of each egress node.
 
References relevant to this work:
1281-network-proxy
[+https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C01C8502FMM/p1658427627751939+]
[+https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1131/commits/28546dc587dc028dc8bded715847346ff99d65ea+]

Epic SDN-3199: [4.12] k8s 1.25 rebase

This Epic is here to track the rebase we need to do when kube 1.25 is GA https://www.kubernetes.dev/resources/release/

Keeping this in mind can help us plan our time better. ATTOW GA is planned for August 23

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h1XsEt1Iug-W9JRheQas7YRsUJ_NQ8ghEMVmOZ4X-0s/edit --> this is the link for rebase help

Incomplete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were not completed when this image was assembled

Epic HOSTEDCP-605: house keeping 4.13

Place holder epic to track spontaneous task which does not deserve its own epic.

Story HOSTEDCP-939: e2e clusters should share the same OIDC provider

AWS has a hard limit of 100 OIDC providers globally. 
Currently each HostedCluster created by e2e creates its own OIDC provider, which results in hitting the quota limit frequently and causing the tests to fail as a result.

 
DOD:
Only a single OIDC provider should be created and shared between all e2e HostedClusters. 

Story HOSTEDCP-900: AWSPrivateLink controller does not respect the PausedUntil statement on HostedCluster spec

Once the HostedCluster and NodePool gets stopped using PausedUntil statement, the awsprivatelink controller will continue reconciling.

 

How to test this:

  • Deploy a private cluster
  • Put it in pause once deployed
  • Delete the AWSEndPointService and the Service from the HCP namespace
  • And wait for a reconciliation, the result it's that they should not be recreated
  • Unpause it and wait for recreation.
Story HOSTEDCP-806: Validate etcd KMS config is valid and signal in condition otherwise

DoD:

At the moment if the input etcd kms encryption (key and role) is invalid we fail transparently.

We should check that both key and role are compatible/operational for a given cluster and fail in a condition otherwise

Epic METAL-158: Streamline Machine OS image management

Changes made in METAL-1 open up opportunities to improve our handling of images by cleaning up redundant code that generates extra work for the user and extra load for the cluster.

Story METAL-157: Don't run image cache unless required

We only need to run the image cache DaemonSet if there is a QCOW URL to be mirrored (effectively this means a cluster installed with 4.9 or earlier). We can stop deploying it for new clusters installed with 4.10 or later.

Currently, the image-customization-controller relies on the image cache running on every master to provide the shared hostpath volume containing the ISO and initramfs. The first step is to replace this with a regular volume and an init container in the i-c-c pod that extracts the images from machine-os-images. We can use the copy-metal -image-build flag (instead of -all used in the shared volume) to provide only the required images.

Once i-c-c has its own volume, we can switch the image extraction in the metal3 Pod's init container to use the -pxe flag instead of -all.

The machine-os-images init container for the image cache (not the metal3 Pod) can be removed. The whole image cache deployment is now optional and need only be started if provisioningOSDownloadURL is set (and in fact should be deleted if it is not).

Epic MGMT-10400: Disk cleaning improvements

Epic Goal

  • To improve the reliability of disk cleaning before installation and to provide the user with sufficient warning regarding the consequences of the cleaning

Why is this important?

  • Insufficient cleaning can lead to installation failure
  • Insufficient warning can lead to complaints of unexpected data loss

Scenarios

  1.  

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. …

Open questions::

  1. …

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
Bug MGMT-11695: Disk cleanup does not clean all volume groups in a physical volume

Description of the problem:
When running assisted-installer on a machine where is more than one volume group per physical volume. Only the first volume group will be cleaned up. This leads to problems later and will lead to errors such as 

Failed - failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- pvremove /dev/sda -y -ff], Error exit status 5, LastOutput "Can't open /dev/sda exclusively. Mounted filesystem?

How reproducible:

Set up a VM with more than one volume group per physical volume. As an example, look at the following sample from a customer cluster.

List block devices
/usr/bin/lsblk -o NAME,MAJ:MIN,SIZE,TYPE,FSTYPE,KNAME,MODEL,UUID,WWN,HCTL,VENDOR,STATE,TRAN,PKNAME
NAME              MAJ:MIN   SIZE TYPE FSTYPE      KNAME MODEL            UUID                                   WWN                HCTL       VENDOR   STATE   TRAN PKNAME
loop0               7:0   125.9G loop xfs         loop0                  c080b47b-2291-495c-8cc0-2009ebc39839                                                       
loop1               7:1   885.5M loop squashfs    loop1                                                                                                             
sda                 8:0   894.3G disk             sda   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b2db 1:0:0:0    ATA      running sas  
|-sda1              8:1     250M part             sda1                                                          0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda2              8:2     750M part ext2        sda2                   3aa73c72-e342-4a07-908c-a8a49767469d   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda3              8:3      49G part xfs         sda3                   ffc3ccfe-f150-4361-8ae5-f87b17c13ac2   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda4              8:4   394.2G part LVM2_member sda4                   Ua3HOc-Olm4-1rma-q0Ug-PtzI-ZOWg-RJ63uY 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
`-sda5              8:5     450G part LVM2_member sda5                   W8JqrD-ZvaC-uNK9-Y03D-uarc-Tl4O-wkDdhS 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sda5
sdb                 8:16  894.3G disk             sdb   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b31b 1:0:1:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdb1              8:17  894.3G part LVM2_member sdb1                   6ETObl-EzTd-jLGw-zVNc-lJ5O-QxgH-5wLAqD 0x55cd2e415235b31b                                  sdb
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdb1
sdc                 8:32  894.3G disk             sdc   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b652 1:0:2:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdc1              8:33  894.3G part LVM2_member sdc1                   pBuktx-XlCg-6Mxs-lddC-qogB-ahXa-Nd9y2p 0x55cd2e415235b652                                  sdc
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdc1
sdd                 8:48  894.3G disk             sdd   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e41521679b7 1:0:3:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdd1              8:49  894.3G part LVM2_member sdd1                   exVSwU-Pe07-XJ6r-Sfxe-CQcK-tu28-Hxdnqo 0x55cd2e41521679b7                                  sdd
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdd1
sr0                11:0     989M rom  iso9660     sr0   Virtual CDROM0   2022-06-17-18-18-33-00                                    0:0:0:0    AMI      running usb

Now run the assisted installer and try to install an SNO node on this machine, you will find that the installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Actual results:

 The installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Expected results:

The installation should proceed and the cluster should start to install.

Suspected Cases
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3809
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3802
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3810

Bug MGMT-10085: [Assisted-4.10][Staging] Disk cleanup fails the installation in case disk setup is lvm on raid

Description of the problem:

Cluster Installation fail if installation disk has lvm on raid:

Host: test-infra-cluster-3cc862c9-master-0, reached installation stage Failed: failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- mdadm --stop /dev/md0], Error exit status 1, LastOutput "mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md0:Perhaps a running process, mounted filesystem or active volume group?"

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install a cluster while master nodes has disk with LVM on RAID (reproduces using test: https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/ocp-edge-qe/kni-assisted-installer-auto/-/blob/master/api_tests/test_disk_cleanup.py#L97)

Actual results:

Installation failed

Expected results:

Installation success

Epic MGMT-8804: Fix flaky/broken jobs

Epic Goal

  • Increase success-rate of of our CI jobs
  • Improve debugability / visibility or tests 

Why is this important?

  • Failed presubmit jobs (required or optional) can make an already tested+approved PR to not get in
  • Failed periodic jobs interfere our visibility around stability of features
Epic NHE-6: Track cross-project development needs for HWOL
Bug OCPBUGS-3468: Disable check_pkt_length in OVN-K for OvS Hardware Offload Cases

Description of problem:

check_pkt_length cannot be offloaded without
1) sFlow offload patches in Openvswitch
2) Hardware driver support.

Since 1) will not be done anytime soon. We need a work around for the check_pkt_length issue.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11/4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Any flow that has check_pkt_len()
  5-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  6-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  4-b: Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  10-b: Host Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  11-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  12-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)  

Actual results:

Poor performance due to upcalls when check_pkt_len() is not supported.

Expected results:

Good performance.

Additional info:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LHY-Af-2kQHVwtW4aVdHnmwZLTiatiyf-ySffC8O5NM/edit#gid=670206692
Epic OCPBUILD-44: Dev Preview - User Namespace Builds

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Run OpenShift builds that do not execute as the "root" user on the host node.

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift builds require an elevated set of capabilities to build a container image
  • Builds currently run as root to maintain adequate performance
  • Container workloads should run as non-root from the host's perspective. Containers running as root are a known security risk.
  • Builds currently run as root and require a privileged container. See BUILD-225 for removing the privileged container requirement.

Scenarios

  1. Run BuildConfigs in a multi-tenant environment
  2. Run BuildConfigs in a heightened security environment/deployment

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can opt into running builds in a cri-o user namespace by providing an environment variable with a specific value.
  • When the correct environment variable is provided, builds run in a cri-o user namespace, and the build pod does not require the "privileged: true" security context.
  • User namespace builds can pass basic test scenarios for the Docker and Source strategy build.
  • Steps to run unprivileged builds are documented.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Buildah supports running inside a non-privileged container
  2. CRI-O allows workloads to opt into running containers in user namespaces.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. BUILD-225 - remove privileged requirement for builds.

Open questions::

  1. …

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
Story BUILD-433: Run Unprivileged Builds with Environment Variable

User Story

As a developer building container images on OpenShift
I want to specify that my build should run without elevated privileges
So that builds do not run as root from the host's perspective with elevated privileges

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can provide an environment variable to indicate the build should not use privileged containers
  • When the correct env var + value is specified, builds run in a user namespace (non-root on the host)

QE Impact

No QE required for Dev Preview. OpenShift regression testing will verify that existing behavior is not impacted.

Docs Impact

We will need to document how to enable this feature, with sufficient warnings regarding Dev Preview.

PX Impact

This likely warrants an OpenShift blog post, potentially?

Notes

Epic OPNET-19: OPNET Backlog

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • ...

Why is this important?

  • …

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. …

Open questions::

  1. …

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
Feature Request RFE-2962: Swap order of configure-ovs and nodeip-configuration

We have been running into a number of problems with configure-ovs and nodeip-configuration selecting different interfaces in OVNK deployments. This causes connectivity issues, so we need some way to ensure that everything uses the same interface/IP.

Currently configure-ovs runs before nodeip-configuration, but since nodeip-configuration is the source of truth for IP selection regardless of CNI plugin, I think we need to look at swapping that order. That way configure-ovs could look at what nodeip-configuration chose and not have to implement its own interface selection logic.

I'm targeting this at 4.12 because even though there's probably still time to get it in for 4.11, changing the order of boot services is always a little risky and I'd prefer to do it earlier in the cycle so we have time to tease out any issues that arise. We may need to consider backporting the change though since this has been an issue at least back to 4.10.

Epic OU-34: The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
Epic RHSTOR-3173: Provide an indication of advanced features usage

Goal
Provide an indication that advanced features are used

Problem

Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features.

Why is this important?

  1. Better focus upsell efforts
  2. Compliance information for customers that are not aware they are not using the right subscription

 

Prioritized Scenarios

In Scope
1. Add a boolean variable in our telemetry to mark if the customer is using advanced features (PV encryption, encryption with KMS, external mode). 

Not in Scope

Integrate with subscription watch - will be done by the subscription watch team with our help.

Customers

All

Customer Facing Story
As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions

What does success look like?

A clear indication in subscription watch for ODF usage (either essential or advanced). 

Task MON-2654: Add a boolean value to indicate advanced feature usage into telemetry

1. Proposed title of this feature request

  • Request to add a bool variable into telemetry which indicates the usage of any of the advanced feature, like PV encryption or KMS encryption or external mode etc.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?

  • Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features. This feature will help RH to have a better indication on the statistics of customers using the advanced features and focus better on upsell efforts.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

  • As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions.

4. List any affected packages or components.

  • Telemetry

_____________________

Link to main epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHSTOR-3173

 

Epic RHSTOR-3379: Migrate to odf-console from OCP Console (remaining bits)

We migrated most component as part of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHSTOR-2165
We now have a few components remaining roughly 15 to 20%. This epic tragets

Other Complete

This section includes Jira cards that are not linked to either an Epic or a Feature. These tickets were completed when this image was assembled

Bug OCPBUGS-5384: Old AWS boot images vs. 4.12: unknown provider 'ec2'

Description of problem:

4.2 AWS boot images such as ami-01e7fdcb66157b224 include the old ignition.platform.id=ec2 kernel command line parameter. When launched against 4.12.0-rc.3, new machines fail with:

  1. The old user-data and old AMI successfully get to the machine-config-server request stage.
  2. The new instance will then request the full Ignition from /config/worker , and the machine-config server translates that to the old Ignition v2 spec format.
  3. The instance will lay down that Ignition-formatted content, and then try and reboot into the new state.
  4. Coming back up in the new state, the modern Afterburn comes up to try and figure out a node name for the kubelet, and this fails with unknown provider 'ec2'.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

coreos-assemblers used ignition.platform.id=ec2, but pivoted to =aws here. It's not clear when that made its way into new AWS boot images. Some time after 4.2 and before 4.6.

Afterburn dropped support for legacy command-line options like the ec2 slug in 5.0.0. But it's not clear when that shipped into RHCOS. The release controller points at this RHCOS diff, but that has afterburn-0-5.3.0-1 builds on both sides.

How reproducible:

100%, given a sufficiently old AMI and a sufficiently new OpenShift release target.

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Install 4.12.0-rc.3 or similar new OpenShift on AWS in us-east-1.
  2. Create Ignition v2 user-data in a Secret in openshift-machine-api. I'm fuzzy on how to do that portion easily, since it's basically RFE-3001 backwards.
  3. Edit a compute MachineSet to set spec.template.spec.providerSpec.value.ami to id: ami-01e7fdcb66157b224 and also point it at your v2 user-data Secret.
  4. Possibly delete an existing Machine in that MachineSet, or raise replicas, or otherwise talk the MachineSet controller into provisioning a new Machine to pick up the reconfigured AMI.

Actual results:

The new Machine will get to Provisioned but fail to progress to Running. systemd journal logs will include unknown provider 'ec2' for Afterburn units.

Expected results:

Old boot-image AMIs can successfully update to 4.12.

Alternatively, we pin down the set of exposed boot images sufficiently that users with older clusters can audit for exposure and avoid the issue by updating to more modern boot images (although updating boot images is not trivial, see RFE-3001 and the Ignition spec 2 to 3 transition discussed in kcs#5514051.

Bug OCPBUGS-729: vsphere privilege check fails on vsphere6.7 u3 as missing privilege "InventoryService.Tagging.ObjectAttachable"

Description of problem:

QE has one vsphere6.7 u3 env, privilege "InventoryService.Tagging.ObjectAttachable" does not exist, and installer fails as below.

FATAL failed to fetch Terraform Variables: failed to fetch dependency of "Terraform Variables": failed to generate asset "Platform Provisioning Check": platform.vsphere.defaultDatastore: Internal error: privileges missing for vSphere vCenter Datastore: InventoryService.Tagging.ObjectAttachable

As vSphere 6.7 U3 is deprecated but not removed, so it should be supported, users may hit the similar issue on 6.7u3 when fresh installing.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-30-142847

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create role for each vsphere objects and assign listed privileges on it based on instlallation doc, then add permission to each object with created and user 
2. Install IPI cluster on vSphere platform by this user
3. Installer fails and complains that missing privilege "InventoryService.Tagging.ObjectAttachable"

Actual results:

Installer fails and complains that missing privilege "InventoryService.Tagging.ObjectAttachable"

Expected results:

Installer should succeed.

Additional info:

 
Task AGENT-321: Not all "errors" are actually errors

Not all of the errors reported by the assisted API (and shown in the wait-for bootstrap complete output) actually require user action.

Some appear when the agents first register but resolve themselves relatively quickly in the natural course of events.

Some, like the availability of NTP, don't block the installation from proceeding at all.

We need to think about the best ways of exposing this information to the user.

Bug OCPBUGS-3941: Whereabouts CNI timesout while iterating exclude range [backport 4.12]

Description of problem:

When creating a pod with an additional network that contains a `spec.config.ipam.exclude` range, any address within the excluded range is still iterated while searching for a suitable IP candidate. As a result, pod creation times out when large exclude ranges are used.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

with big exclude ranges, 100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. create network-attachment-definition with a large range:

$ cat <<EOF| oc apply -f -       
apiVersion: k8s.cni.cncf.io/v1                                            
kind: NetworkAttachmentDefinition
metadata:
  name: nad-w-excludes
spec:
  config: |-
    {
      "cniVersion": "0.3.1",
      "name": "macvlan-net",
      "type": "macvlan",
      "master": "ens3",
      "mode": "bridge",
      "ipam": {
         "type": "whereabouts",
         "range": "fd43:01f1:3daa:0baa::/64",
         "exclude": [ "fd43:01f1:3daa:0baa::/100" ],
         "log_file": "/tmp/whereabouts.log",
         "log_level" : "debug"
      }
    }
EOF
2. create a pod with the network attached:

$ cat <<EOF|oc apply -f -
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
  name: pod-with-exclude-range
  annotations:
    k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/networks: nad-w-excludes
spec:
  containers:
  - name: pod-1
    image: openshift/hello-openshift
EOF

3. check pod status, event log and whereabouts logs after a while: 

$ oc get pods
NAME                        READY   STATUS              RESTARTS   AGE
pod-with-exclude-range      0/1     ContainerCreating   0          2m23s

$ oc get events
<...>
6m39s       Normal    Scheduled                                    pod/pod-with-exclude-range                   Successfully assigned default/pod-with-exclude-range to <worker-node>
6m37s       Normal    AddedInterface                               pod/pod-with-exclude-range                   Add eth0 [10.129.2.49/23] from openshift-sdn
2m39s       Warning   FailedCreatePodSandBox                       pod/pod-with-exclude-range                   Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = DeadlineExceeded desc = context deadline exceeded

$ oc debug node/<worker-node> - tail /host/tmp/whereabouts.log
Starting pod/<worker-node>-debug ...
To use host binaries, run `chroot /host`
2022-10-27T14:14:50Z [debug] Finished leader election
2022-10-27T14:14:50Z [debug] IPManagement: {fd43:1f1:3daa:baa::1 ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000} , <nil>
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] Used defaults from parsed flat file config @ /etc/kubernetes/cni/net.d/whereabouts.d/whereabouts.conf
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] ADD - IPAM configuration successfully read: {Name:macvlan-net Type:whereabouts Routes:[] Datastore:kubernetes Addresses:[] OmitRanges:[fd43:01f1:3daa:0baa::/80] DNS: {Nameservers:[] Domain: Search:[] Options:[]} Range:fd43:1f1:3daa:baa::/64 RangeStart:fd43:1f1:3daa:baa:: RangeEnd:<nil> GatewayStr: EtcdHost: EtcdUsername: EtcdPassword:********* EtcdKeyFile: EtcdCertFile: EtcdCACertFile: LeaderLeaseDuration:1500 LeaderRenewDeadline:1000 LeaderRetryPeriod:500 LogFile:/tmp/whereabouts.log LogLevel:debug OverlappingRanges:true SleepForRace:0 Gateway:<nil> Kubernetes: {KubeConfigPath:/etc/kubernetes/cni/net.d/whereabouts.d/whereabouts.kubeconfig K8sAPIRoot:} ConfigurationPath:PodName:pod-with-exclude-range PodNamespace:default} 
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] Beginning IPAM for ContainerID: f4ffd0e07d6c1a2b6ffb0fa29910c795258792bb1a1710ff66f6b48fab37af82
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] Started leader election
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] OnStartedLeading() called
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] Elected as leader, do processing
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] IPManagement - mode: 0 / containerID:f4ffd0e07d6c1a2b6ffb0fa29910c795258792bb1a1710ff66f6b48fab37af82 / podRef: default/pod-with-exclude-range
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] IterateForAssignment input >> ip: fd43:1f1:3daa:baa:: | ipnet: {fd43:1f1:3daa:baa:: ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000} | first IP: fd43:1f1:3daa:baa::1 | last IP: fd43:1f1:3daa:baa:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff

Actual results:

Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = DeadlineExceeded desc = context deadline exceeded

Expected results:

additional network gets attached to the pod

Additional info:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bug OCPBUGS-4527: hypershift: aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator uses wrong kubeconfig

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4491. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 
Bug OCPBUGS-6957: [4.12z] Random SYN drops in OVS bridges of OVN-Kubernetes

Description of problem:

SYN packets for new tcp connections from inside the cluster to an external destination are dropped at random. After few seconds (i.e. few retries), they eventually succeed and no more packet drop happens. Hence, this is perceived as too long TCP connection establishment delay.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.0

How reproducible:

Frequently at a concrete cluster. Other clusters with apparently similar configuration don't show the issue.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Establish TCP connection from pod to external destination.
2.
3.

Actual results:

SYN packets dropped, long TCP establishment time, leading to timeouts.

Expected results:

No drops

Additional info:

This becomes especially harmful because it impacts communication from openshift-apiserver (not to be confused with kube-apiserver) and etcd, because the former is inside the SDN and etcd isn't.

More details will follow in comments.
Bug OCPBUGS-861: Rebase openshift/etcd 4.12 onto v3.5.5
Bug OCPBUGS-3944: Handle 0600 kubeconfig

Clone of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGSM-44162.

Cannot use the original as the bot won't accept a security bug:

When the change merges, the Bugzilla associated with the CVE must be set to MODIFIED. Since the DPTP bugzilla bot is not permitted to scan bugs with the SECURITY group in Bugzilla, The REP will not be able to use the bot's public functionality of moving their bug to MODIFIED.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KuenDafC3Ukw19jY55tkVeH8nNVVAi8TEAfqynoVfzY/edit#heading=h.ikdk6suc575k

Bug OCPBUGS-5143: provisioning on ilo4-virtualmedia BMC driver fails with error: "Creating vfat image failed: Unexpected error while running command"

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5136. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Provisioning on ilo4-virtualmedia BMC driver fails with error: "Creating vfat image failed: Unexpected error while running command"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13 (but will apply to older OpenShift versions too)

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.configure some nodes with ilo4-virtualmedia://
2.attempt provisioning
3.

Actual results:

provisioning fails with error similar to  Failed to inspect hardware. Reason: unable to start inspection: Validation of image href https://10.1.235.67:6183/ilo/boot-9db13f93-861a-4d27-b20d-2c228559faa2.iso failed, reason: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='10.1.235.67', port=6183): Max retries exceeded with url: /ilo/boot-9db13f93-861a-4d27-b20d-2c228559faa2.iso (Caused by SSLError(SSLCertVerificationError(1, '[SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: self-signed certificate in certificate chain (_ssl.c:1129)')))

Expected results:

Provisioning succeeds

Additional info:

This happens after a preceding issue with missing iLO driver configuration has been fixed (https://github.com/metal3-io/ironic-image/pull/402)
Bug OCPBUGS-5185: Dev Sandbox clusters uses clusterType OSD and there is no way to enforce DEVSANDBOX

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5165. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Currently, the Dev Sandbox clusters sends the clusterType "OSD" instead of "DEVSANDBOX" because the configuration annotations of the console config are automatically overridden by some SyncSets.

Open Dev Sandbox and browser console and inspect window.SERVER_FLAGS.telemetry

Bug OCPBUGS-6045: The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
Bug OCPBUGS-6309: The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
Bug OCPBUGS-7556: OLM downstream utest fails due to new release-XX+1 branch creation

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7102. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/blob/7ec6b948a148171bd336750fed98818890136429/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/pkg/controller/operators/olm/plugins/downstream_csv_namespace_labeler_plugin_test.go#L309

has a dependency on creation of a next-version release branch.

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. clone operator-framework/operator-framework-olm
2. make unit/olm
3. deal with a really bumpy first-time kubebuilder/envtest install experience
4. profit

 

 

Actual results:

error

Expected results:

pass

Additional info:

 

 

Bug OCPBUGS-8508: [4.12] egress firewall acls are deleted on restart

Description of problem:

During restart egress firewall acls will be deleted and re-created from scratch, meaning that egress firewall rules won't be applied for some time during restart

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 
Bug OCPBUGS-2176: The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
Bug OCPBUGS-5474: [4.12]Default CatalogSource aren't created in restricted mode

Description of problem:

The default catalogSources are not being ran in restricted mode.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create an 4.12 openshift cluster
2. Check the securityContextConfig for the default catalogSources

Actual results:

$ k get catsrc  -n openshift-marketplace -o yaml | grep securityContextConfig
    securityContextConfig: legacy
    securityContextConfig: legacy
    securityContextConfig: legacy
    securityContextConfig: legacy

Expected results:

$ k get catsrc  -n openshift-marketplace -o yaml | grep securityContextConfig
      securityContextConfig: restricted
      securityContextConfig: restricted
      securityContextConfig: restricted
      securityContextConfig: restricted

Additional info:

 

 

 

 

Bug OCPBUGS-5764: Expose Azure useImageGallery parameter in the MachineSets() call

Description of problem:

As a downstream consumer of the installer (as a library), I want to be able to choose whether or not the image gallery is used when creating machinesets on Azure so that I can achieve backwards compatibility with pre-4.12

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12+

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Try to generate machinesets in pre-4.12 environment
2. Lament as the installer automatically uses image gallery regardless

Actual results:

Installer attempts to guess whether to use image gallery

Expected results:

I should be able to choose myself

Additional info:

 
Bug OCPBUGS-3837: service account token secret reference

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1428. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

When using an OperatorGroup attached to a service account, AND if there is a secret present in the namespace, the operator installation will fail with the message:
the service account does not have any API secret sa=testx-ns/testx-sa
This issue seems similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094303 - which was resolved in 4.11.0 - however, the new element now, is that the presence of a secret in the namespace  is causing the issue.
The name of the secret seems significant - suggesting something somewhere is depending on the order that secrets are listed in. For example, If the secret in the namespace is called "asecret", the problem does not occur. If it is called "zsecret", the problem always occurs.
"zsecret" is not a "kubernetes.io/service-account-token". The issue I have raised here relates to Opaque secrets - zsecret is an Opaque secret. The issue may apply to other types of secrets, but specifically my issue is that when there is an opaque secret present in the namespace, the operator install fails as described. I aught to be allowed to have an opaque secret present in the namespace where I am installing the operator.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.0 & 4.11.1

How reproducible:

100% reproducible

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Create namespace: oc new-project testx-ns
2. oc apply -f api-secret-issue.yaml

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

API YAML:

cat api-secret-issue.yaml 
apiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
metadata:
  name: zsecret
  namespace: testx-ns
  annotations:
   kubernetes.io/service-account.name: testx-sa
type: Opaque
stringData:
  mykey: mypass

—

apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
  name: testx-sa
  namespace: testx-ns

—

kind: OperatorGroup
apiVersion: operators.coreos.com/v1
metadata:
  name: testx-og
  namespace: testx-ns
spec:
  serviceAccountName: "testx-sa"
  targetNamespaces:
  - testx-ns

—

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: Role
metadata:
  name: testx-role
  namespace: testx-ns
rules:

  • apiGroups: ["*"]
      resources: ["*"]
      verbs: ["*"] 
      
    —

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
  name: testx-rolebinding
  namespace: testx-ns
roleRef:
  apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
  kind: Role
  name: testx-role
subjects:

  • kind: ServiceAccount
      name: testx-sa
      namespace: testx-ns

—

apiVersion: operators.coreos.com/v1alpha1
kind: Subscription
metadata:
  name: etcd-operator
  namespace: testx-ns
spec:
  channel: singlenamespace-alpha
  installPlanApproval: Automatic
  name: etcd
  source: community-operators
  sourceNamespace: openshift-marketplace

Bug OCPBUGS-4117: Re-enable serverless CI tests

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2281. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

E2E test cases for knative and pipeline packages have been disabled on CI due to respective operator installation issues. 
Tests have to be enabled after new operator version be available or the issue resolves

References:
https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C6A3NV5J9/p1664545970777239

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):





How reproducible:








Steps to Reproduce:




1.
2.
3.





Actual results:








Expected results:








Additional info:







            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-943:
            
             Could not import Devfile after testing a non-Devfile version
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
Description of problem:

When the user selects Serverless as an import strategy and tried to import a Devfile,  the import fails because of an invalid Deployment.



Could reproduce this already in 4.11, but its even more prominent in 4.12 when the console automatically selects the resource type serverless when the Serverless operator is installed.



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Works on 4.10

Failed on 4.11 and 4.12 master



How reproducible:

Always



Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install and setup Serverless operator

1. Switch to dev perspective, navigate to add > import from git

3. Enter a non-Devfile git URL like https://github.com/jerolimov/nodeinfo

4. On 4.11 select resource type Serverless (on 4.12 this should be selected automatically)

5. Update the git URL to a repo with a Devfile like https://github.com/nodeshift-starters/devfile-sample

6. Press create



Actual results:

Import fails with error:



Error "Invalid value: "": name part must be non-empty" for field "spec.template.labels".



Expected results:

Devfile should be imported



Additional info:

            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Story 
            
            
            AGENT-271:
            
             Generate OpenShift console password at the same time as the Agent ISO
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
Similar to how we generate the kubeconfig at the same time as the ISO, we should also generate the admin password.



This will require changes to the installer to allow assisted-service to pass at least the hash of the password in to the installer process that generates the bootstrap ignition, similar in concept to the changes made to pass the kubeconfig.

            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-3221:
            
             The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-1237:
            
             e2e-gcp-builds is permafailing
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
job=pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-builds=all



This test has started permafailing on e2e-gcp-builds:



[sig-builds][Feature:Builds][Slow] s2i build with environment file in sources Building from a template should create a image from "test-env-build.json" template and run it in a pod [apigroup:build.openshift.io][apigroup:image.openshift.io]




The error in the test says





Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:21 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Pulling: Pulling image "image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/e2e-test-build-sti-env-nglnt/test@sha256:262820fd1a94d68442874346f4c4024fdf556631da51cbf37ce69de094f56fe8"
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:23 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Pulled: Successfully pulled image "image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/e2e-test-build-sti-env-nglnt/test@sha256:262820fd1a94d68442874346f4c4024fdf556631da51cbf37ce69de094f56fe8" in 1.763914719s
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:23 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Created: Created container test
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:23 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Started: Started container test
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:24 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Pulled: Container image "image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/e2e-test-build-sti-env-nglnt/test@sha256:262820fd1a94d68442874346f4c4024fdf556631da51cbf37ce69de094f56fe8" already present on machine
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:25 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Unhealthy: Readiness probe failed: Get "http://10.129.2.63:8080/": dial tcp 10.129.2.63:8080: connect: connection refused
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:26 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} BackOff: Back-off restarting failed container





            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-990:
            
             HyperShift 4.12 jobs fail to install csi-snapshot-controller-operator
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
Description of problem:



Failing job: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-periodics-conformance-aws-ovn-4-12/1567473426195550208



csi-snapshot-controller-operator logs:



https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-periodics-conformance-aws-ovn-4-12/1567473426195550208/artifacts/conformance-aws-ovn-4-12/dump/artifacts/hostedcluster-da2f3c83dcf87b3116fc/namespaces/openshift-cluster-storage-operator/pods/csi-snapshot-controller-operator-6f798d4f4d-l7pvs/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/logs/current.log



 



The operator misses some RBAC:




2022-09-07T12:13:09.457345845Z F0907 12:13:09.457292       1 cmd.go:138] unable to load configmap based request-header-client-ca-file: configmaps "extension-apiserver-authentication" is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-storage-operator:csi-snapshot-controller-operator" cannot get resource "configmaps" in API group "" in the namespace "kube-system"





 



Surprisingly, standalone OCP jobs work well.

            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Task 
            
            
            AGENT-365:
            
             Set unique install method in cluster
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
When we get telemetry from connected clusters, we want to be able to tell when they were created with the agent installer vs. the host assisted service. Currently there is no way to distinguish.



It's not clear whether any particular group owns the namespace of installation methods, or whom we need to notify when we create one.

            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-3841:
            
             Remove flowcontrol/v1beta1 release manifests in 4.12 and later
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
In 4.12.0-rc.0 some API-server components declare flowcontrol/v1beta1 release manifests:





$ oc adm release extract --to manifests quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release:4.12.0-rc.0-x86_64
$ grep -r flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io manifests
manifests/0000_50_cluster-authentication-operator_09_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_50_cluster-authentication-operator_09_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_50_cluster-authentication-operator_09_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_50_cluster-authentication-operator_09_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_20_etcd-operator_10_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_20_kube-apiserver-operator_08_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_20_kube-apiserver-operator_08_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_20_kube-apiserver-operator_08_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_50_cluster-openshift-apiserver-operator_09_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_50_cluster-openshift-apiserver-operator_09_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_50_cluster-openshift-apiserver-operator_09_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_50_cluster-openshift-controller-manager-operator_10_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1






The APIs are scheduled for removal in Kube 1.26, which will ship with OpenShift 4.13. We want the 4.12 CVO to move to modern APIs in 4.12, so the APIRemovedInNext.*ReleaseInUse alerts are not firing on 4.12.  This ticket tracks removing those manifests, or replacing them with a more modern resource type, or some such.  Definition of done is that new 4.13 (and with backports, 4.12) nightlies no longer include flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1 manifests.



This can be noticed in https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/27560/pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-ovn/1593697975584952320/artifacts/e2e-gcp-ovn/openshift-e2e-test/build-log.txt:





[It] clients should not use APIs that are removed in upcoming releases [apigroup:config.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]
  github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/apiserver/api_requests.go:27
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: api flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 254 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: api horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 10 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: api prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 22 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 224 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 22 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-kube-storage-version-migrator:kube-storage-version-migrator-sa accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 16 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: user/system:admin accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 14 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-monitoring:kube-state-metrics accessed horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling 10 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: api flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 254 times
api horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 10 times
api prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 22 times
user/system:admin accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 14 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 224 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 22 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-kube-storage-version-migrator:kube-storage-version-migrator-sa accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 16 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-monitoring:kube-state-metrics accessed horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling 10 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: api flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 254 times
api horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 10 times
api prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 22 times
user/system:admin accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 14 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 224 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 22 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-kube-storage-version-migrator:kube-storage-version-migrator-sa accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 16 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-monitoring:kube-state-metrics accessed horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling 10 times
[AfterEach] [sig-arch][Late]
  github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/util/client.go:158
[AfterEach] [sig-arch][Late]
  github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/util/client.go:159
flake: api flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 254 times
api horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 10 times
api prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 22 times
user/system:admin accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 14 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 224 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 22 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-kube-storage-version-migrator:kube-storage-version-migrator-sa accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 16 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-monitoring:kube-state-metrics accessed horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling 10 times
Ginkgo exit error 4: exit with code 4






This is required to unblock https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/27561

            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-7078:
            
             Bump to kubernetes 1.25.7
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-1226:
            
             OpenStack UPI scripts do not create server group for Computes
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
We added server groups for control plane and computes as part of OSASINFRA-2570, except for UPI that only creates server group for the control plane.



We need to update the UPI scripts to create server group for computes to be consistent with IPI and have the instruction at https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/machine_management/creating_machinesets/creating-machineset-osp.html work out of the box in case customers want to create MachineSets on their UPI clusters.



Related to OCPCLOUD-1135.

            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-613:
            
             oc adm inspect --rotated-pod-logs not working properly for static pods
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
Description of problem:



The path used by --rotated-pod-logs to gather the rotated pod logs from /var/log/pods node folder via /api/v1/nodes/${NODE}/proxy/logs/${LOG_PATH} is only valid for regular pods but not for static pods.



The main problem is that, while normal pods have their rotated logs at this /var/log/pods/${POD_NAME}_${POD_UID_IN_API}/${CONTAINER_NAME}, static pods have them at /var/log/pods/${POD_NAME}_${CONFIG_HASH}/${CONTAINER_NAME} because the UID cannot be known at the time that the static pod is born (because static pods are created by kubelet before registering them in the kube-apiserver, and UID is assigned by the kube-apiserver).



The visible results of that are:


    
	
  • Spurious errors of not found resources related to the pods.
    • 
	
  • Rotated pod logs are not gathered even if present.
    • 





Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):



4.10



How reproducible:



Always if there are static pods.



Steps to Reproduce:



1. oc adm inspect --rotated-pod-logs ns/openshift-etcd (or any other project with static pods).



Actual results:



    
	
  • Rotated pods not gathered.
    • 
	
  • Errors like these

    

    error: errors occurred while gathering data:
    one or more errors occurred while gathering pod-specific data for namespace: openshift-etcd

    [one or more errors occurred while gathering container data for pod etcd-master-0.example.net:

    the server could not find the requested resource, one or more errors occurred while gathering container data for pod etcd-master-1.example.net:

    the server could not find the requested resource, one or more errors occurred while gathering container data for pod etcd-master-2.example.net:

    the server could not find the requested resource]

    

    • 





Expected results:



No errors like the ones above and rotated pod logs to be gathered, if present.



Additional info:



Despite being marked as experimental, this --rotated-pod-logs is used in must-gather, so this issue can be easily reproduced by just running a default must-gather. I focused on bare oc adm inspect reproducers for simplicity.

            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-7063:
            
             The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Story 
            
            
            AGENT-264:
            
             Validate that MAC addresses in agent config are sane
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
We rely on the user providing accurate information about the MAC addresses in the agent-config, because at the point we read it we haven't seen the hosts yet. However, if the user gets this wrong then chaos may ensue.



Once inventory is available, we should validate that the user has not:


    
	
  • Specified MAC addresses that belong to two different agents in the same host config; nor
    • 
	
  • Specified MAC addresses that belong to the same agent in two different host configs
    • 





and fail the install if they have.

            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-3459:
            
             Installer does not always add router CA to kubeconfig
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3214. The following is the description of the original issue: 

—

Description of problem:




The installer has logic that avoids adding the router CAs to the kubeconfig if the console is not available.  It's not clear why it does this, but it means that the router CAs don't get added when the console is deliberately disabled (it is now an optional capability in 4.12).






Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):




Seen in 4.12+4.13






How reproducible:




Always, when starting a cluster w/o the Console capability





Steps to Reproduce:




1. Edit the install-config to set:
capabilities:
  baselineCapabilitySet: None
2. install the cluster
3. check the CAs in the kubeconfig, the wildcard route CA will be missing (compare it w/ a normal cluster)






Actual results:




router CAs missing






Expected results:




router CAs should be present






Additional info:




This needs to be backported to 4.12.




            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-4098:
            
             [4.12] Egress IP Health Check Is Not Compatible With VF (Hardware Backed) Management Port
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
Description of problem:




For Hardware Backed Management Ports (e.g. Virtual functions), the Egress IP Health Check Feature will error out with:
"unable to start health checking server: no mgmt ip"




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):




OVN-Kubernetes 4.12.0




How reproducible:




Always




Steps to Reproduce:




1. Load OVN-Kubernetes 4.12.0 in MLX BlueField 2
2. If in NIC mode:
https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/pull/3160
https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/pull/3251
Patches are needed.
3. If in DPU mode then those above patches are optional.
4. Set OVNKUBE_NODE_MGMT_PORT_NETDEV environment variable to point to the Virtual Function.




Actual results:




Error in ovnkube-node:
"unable to start health checking server: no mgmt ip".
The ovnkube-node container will crash. Egress IP Health Check should be compatible with VFs as management port.




Expected results:




No Error.




Additional info:




A simple workaround is to not return an error:
go-controller/pkg/node/node.go
@@ -660,7 +660,8 @@ func (n *OvnNode) startEgressIPHealthCheckingServer(wg *sync.WaitGroup, mgmtPort
                        return fmt.Errorf("failed start health checking server due to unsettled IPv6: %w", err)
                }
        } else {
-               return fmt.Errorf("unable to start health checking server: no mgmt ip")
+               klog.Infof("Unable to start Egress IP health checking server: no mgmt ip")
+               return nil
        }



            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-1900:
            
             Bootstrap error in SNO installation
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
Description of problem:




Bootstrap fail in SNO installation




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):




 




How reproducible:




always




Steps to Reproduce:




1. Test this in libvirt env. Agent-config and install-config in attached.
2. Use attached agent-config and install-config to create image
3. Install SNO:
virt-install --connect qemu:///system -n control-0 -r 33000 --vcpus 8 --cdrom ./agent.iso --disk pool=installer,size=120 --boot uefi,hd,cdrom --os-variant=rhel8.5 --network network=default,mac=52:54:00:aa:aa:aa --wait=-1 --check mac_in_use=off
4. There is following error in bootkube.service log:
-- Logs begin at Fri 2022-09-30 08:58:21 UTC, end at Fri 2022-09-30 09:19:40 UTC. --
Sep 30 09:00:51 test.metalkube.org systemd[1]: Starting Bootkube - bootstrap in place post reboot...
Sep 30 09:00:51 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Running bootkube bootstrap-in-place post reboot
Sep 30 09:00:52 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Waiting for api ...
Sep 30 09:00:57 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Waiting for api ...
Sep 30 09:01:02 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Waiting for api ...
Sep 30 09:01:07 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Waiting for api ...
Sep 30 09:01:12 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Waiting for api ...
Sep 30 09:01:17 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Approving csrs ...
Sep 30 09:01:17 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[3045]: error: error executing jsonpath "{.items[0].status.conditions[?(@.type==\"Ready\")].status}": Error executing template: array index out of bounds: index 0, length 0. Printing more information for debugging the template:
Sep 30 09:01:17 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[3045]:         template was:
Sep 30 09:01:17 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[3045]:                 {.items[0].status.conditions[?(@.type=="Ready")].status}
Sep 30 09:01:17 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[3045]:         object given to jsonpath engine was:
Sep 30 09:01:17 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[3045]:                 map[string]interface {}{"apiVersion":"v1", "items":[]interface {}{}, "kind":"List", "metadata":map[string]interface {}{"resourceVersion":""}}
Sep 30 09:01:17 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Approving csrs ...
Sep 30 09:01:51 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[3142]: error: error executing jsonpath "{.items[0].status.conditions[?(@.type==\"Ready\")].status}": Error executing template: array index out of bounds: index 0, length 0. Printing more information for debugging the template:
Sep 30 09:01:51 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[3142]:         template was:
Sep 30 09:01:51 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[3142]:                 {.items[0].status.conditions[?(@.type=="Ready")].status}
Sep 30 09:01:51 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[3142]:         object given to jsonpath engine was:
Sep 30 09:01:51 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[3142]:                 map[string]interface {}{"apiVersion":"v1", "items":[]interface {}{}, "kind":"List", "metadata":map[string]interface {}{"resourceVersion":""}}
Sep 30 09:01:51 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Approving csrs ...
Sep 30 09:02:21 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Approving csrs ...
Sep 30 09:02:52 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Approving csrs ...






Actual results:




 




Expected results:




 




Additional info:




 



            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-4805:
            
             Empty/missing node-sizing SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES parameter can result in kubelet not starting
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4101. The following is the description of the original issue: 

—

Description of problem:




We experienced two separate upgrade failures relating to the introduction of the SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES node sizing parameter, causing kubelet to stop running.

One cluster (clusterA) upgraded from 4.11.14 to 4.11.17. It experienced an issue whereby 
   /etc/node-sizing.env 
on its master nodes contained an empty SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES value:

---
cat /etc/node-sizing.env 
SYSTEM_RESERVED_MEMORY=5.36Gi
SYSTEM_RESERVED_CPU=0.11
SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES=
---

causing the kubelet to not start up. To restore service, this file was manually updated to set a value (1Gi), and kubelet was restarted.

We are uncertain what conditions led to this occuring on the clusterA master nodes as part of the upgrade.

A second cluster (clusterB) upgraded from 4.11.16 to 4.11.17. It experienced an issue whereby worker nodes were impacted by a similar problem, however this was because a custom node-sizing-enabled.env MachineConfig which did not set SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES

This caused existing worker nodes to go into a NotReady state after the ugprade, and additionally new nodes did not join the cluster as their kubelet would become impacted. 

For clusterB the conditions are more well-known of why the value is empty.

However, for both clusters, if SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES ends up as empty on a node it can cause the kubelet to not start. 

We have some asks as a result:
- Can MCO be made to recover from this situation if it occurs, perhaps  through application of a safe default if none exists, such that kubelet would start correctly?
- Can there possibly be alerting that could indicate and draw attention to the misconfiguration?




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):




4.11.17




How reproducible:




Have not been able to reproduce it on a fresh cluster upgrading from 4.11.16 to 4.11.17




Expected results:




If SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES is empty in /etc/node-sizing*env then a default should be applied and/or kubelet able to continue running.




Additional info:




 



            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-3955:
            
             The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-3071:
            
             [4.12][AWS] curl network Loadbalancer always get "Connection time out"
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
Description of problem:




Create network LoadBalancer service, but always get Connection time out when accessing the LB




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):




4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-27-135134




How reproducible:




100%




Steps to Reproduce:




1. create custom ingresscontroller that using Network LB service

$ Domain="nlb.$(oc get dns.config cluster -o=jsonpath='{.spec.baseDomain}')"
$ oc create -f - << EOF
kind: IngressController
apiVersion: operator.openshift.io/v1
metadata:
  name: nlb
  namespace: openshift-ingress-operator
spec:
  domain: ${Domain}
  replicas: 3
  endpointPublishingStrategy:
    loadBalancer:
      providerParameters:
        aws:
          type: NLB
        type: AWS
      scope: External
    type: LoadBalancerService
EOF


2. wait for the ingress NLB service is ready.

$ oc -n openshift-ingress get svc/router-nlb
NAME         TYPE           CLUSTER-IP      EXTERNAL-IP                                                                     PORT(S)                      AGE
router-nlb   LoadBalancer   172.30.75.134   a765a5eb408aa4a68988e35b72672379-78a76c339ded64fa.elb.us-east-2.amazonaws.com   80:31833/TCP,443:32499/TCP   117s


3. curl the network LB

$ curl a765a5eb408aa4a68988e35b72672379-78a76c339ded64fa.elb.us-east-2.amazonaws.com -I
<hang>






Actual results:




Connection time out




Expected results:




curl should return 503




Additional info:




the NLB service has the annotation:
  service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-type: nlb




 

            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-4784:
            
             [4.12] egressIP annotation including two interfaces when multiple networks
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3993. The following is the description of the original issue: 

—

Description of problem:

On Openshift on Openstack CI, we are deploying an OCP cluster with an additional network on the workers in install-config.yaml for integration with Openstack Manila.





compute:
- name: worker
  platform:
    openstack:
      zones: []
      additionalNetworkIDs: ['0eeae16f-bbc7-4e49-90b2-d96419b7c30d']
  replicas: 3






As a result, the egressIP annotation includes two interfaces definition:





$ oc get node ostest-hp9ld-worker-0-gdp5k -o json | jq -r '.metadata.annotations["cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig"]' | jq .                                 
[
  {
    "interface": "207beb76-5476-4a05-b412-d0cc53ab00a7",
    "ifaddr": {
      "ipv4": "10.46.44.64/26"
    },
    "capacity": {
      "ip": 8
    }
  },
  {
    "interface": "2baf2232-87f7-4ad5-bd80-b6586de08435",
    "ifaddr": {
      "ipv4": "172.17.5.0/24"
    },
    "capacity": {
      "ip": 10
    }
  }
]






According to Huiran Wang, egressIP only works for primary interface on the node.




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):




 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-11-22-012345
RHOS-16.1-RHEL-8-20220804.n.1





How reproducible:




Always





Steps to Reproduce:




Deploy cluster with additional Network on the workers





Actual results:




It is possible to select an egressIP network for a secondary interface





Expected results:




Only primary subnet can be chosen for egressIP





Additional info:




https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPQE-12968




            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-7458:
            
             thanos-ruler-user-workload-1 pod is getting repeatedly re-created after upgrade do 4.10.41
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
Description of problem:




- After upgrading to OCP 4.10.41, thanos-ruler-user-workload-1 in the openshift-user-workload-monitoring namespace is consistently being created and deleted.
- We had to scale down the Prometheus operator multiple times so that the upgrade is considered as successful.
- This fix is temporary. After some time it appears again and Prometheus operator needs to be scaled down and up again.
- The issue is present on all clusters in this customer environment which are upgraded to 4.10.41.




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):




 




How reproducible:




N/A, I wasn't able to reproduce the issue.




Steps to Reproduce:




 




Actual results:




 




Expected results:




 




Additional info:




 



            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-4183:
            
             Upgrades from 4.11.9 to latest 4.12.x Nightly builds do not succeed
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2532. The following is the description of the original issue: 

—

Description of problem:




Upgrades from OCP 4.11.9 to the latest OCP 4.12 Nightly builds including 4.12.0-ec.4 will fail.  When the upgrade fails, there are typically two operators that never get upgraded(all others do upgrade to the targeted 4.12.x release):

dns                                        4.11.9                                     True        True          False      11h     DNS "default" reports Progressing=True: "Have 4 available DNS pods, want 5."...
machine-config                             4.11.9                                     True        False         False      14h

The dns.operator details state it is waiting for a 4/5 pods to become available:
# oc describe dns.operator/default
...
Status:
  Cluster Domain:  cluster.local
  Cluster IP:      172.30.0.10
  Conditions:
    Last Transition Time:  2022-10-18T03:21:44Z
    Message:               Enough DNS pods are available, and the DNS service has a cluster IP address.
    Reason:                AsExpected
    Status:                False
    Type:                  Degraded
    Last Transition Time:  2022-10-18T03:21:44Z
    Message:               Have 4 available DNS pods, want 5.
    Reason:                Reconciling
    Status:                True
    Type:                  Progressing

The mcp reports everything is good:
# oc get mcp
NAME     CONFIG                                             UPDATED   UPDATING   DEGRADED   MACHINECOUNT   READYMACHINECOUNT   UPDATEDMACHINECOUNT   DEGRADEDMACHINECOUNT   AGE
master   rendered-master-87fd457ffdaf49d75e62b532c22a9f1d   True      False      False      3              3                   3                     0                      14h
worker   rendered-worker-7fc68009b1facf8724cd952cb08435ff   True      False      False      2              2                   2                     0                      14h

We have performed a large number of the same upgrades, using the same configuration, and while there are times the upgrade succeeds, the large number of results do fail.  This seems to be a timing issue.  

As a current workaround, if we were to recycle the control plane nodes, the upgrade will complete successfully. 

A must-gather log is attached for review.




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):




Tested upgrading to all the following releases:
4.12.0-ec.4
4.12.0-0.nightly-s390x-2022-10-10-005931
4.12.0-0.nightly-s390x-2022-10-15-144437




How reproducible:




Moderate to Consistently 




Steps to Reproduce:




1. Start with a working OCP 4.11.9 Cluster.
2. Perform an upgrade to latest OCP 4.12.x nightly build.
3. Monitor the upgrade status:
   # oc get clusterversion
   —> will state % complete and waiting on dns - which never finishes.
   # oc get co
   —> the dns and machine-config operators will remain at 4.11.9
4. Upgrade will never complete. 




Actual results:




Upgrade will never complete.




Expected results:




Upgrade to the targeted release succeeds.




Additional info:




This upgrade issue occurs for both Connected and Disconnected Clusters.




 

            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-4681:
            
             [release-4.12] remove unnecessary RBAC in KCM
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3283. The following is the description of the original issue: 

—

Description of problem:



We discovered that we are shipping unnecesary RBAC in https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CC3CZCQHM/p1667571136730989 .



This RBAC was only used 4.2 and 4.3 for


    
	
  • for making a switch from configMaps to leases in leader election
    • 





and we should remove it




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):{code:none}






How reproducible:




 




Steps to Reproduce:




1.
2.
3.





Actual results:




 




Expected results:




 




Additional info:




 



            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            MON-2658:
            
             CMO e2e: some containers need securityContext.capabilities settings
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
Our CMO e2e tests create several containers besides the standard CMO deployment. These pods do currently not set any security context capabilities. Currently this creates a warning like so:



W0705 08:35:38.590283 15206 warnings.go:70] would violate PodSecurity "restricted:v1.24": allowPrivilegeEscalation != false (container "alertmanager-webhook-e2e-testutil" must set securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation=false), unrestricted capabilities (container "alertmanager-webhook-e2e-testutil" must set securityContext.capabilities.drop=["ALL"]), runAsNonRoot != true (pod or container "alertmanager-webhook-e2e-testutil" must set securityContext.runAsNonRoot=true), seccompProfile (pod or container "alertmanager-webhook-e2e-testutil" must set securityContext.seccompProfile.type to "RuntimeDefault" or "Localhost")



We should be proactive and set security capability contraints. From this run this seems to impact the following pods/containers:


    
	
  • alertmanager-webhook-e2e-testutil
    • 
	
  • prometheus-example-app
    • 





Both are used more then once.



Relevant docs: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.10/authentication/managing-security-context-constraints.html#security-context-constraints-about_configuring-internal-oauth

            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-194:
            
             Layout for API Explorer page is incorrect
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
Description of problem:



The API Explorer page layout is incorrect,  please check the attachment for more details



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):



4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-15-150248



How reproducible:



Always



Steps to Reproduce:

1. Login OCP, Go to Home -> API Explorer page



2. Check if there is an extra blank line between the dropdown filter and the list 



Actual results:



There is an extra blank line between the dropdown filter and the list 



Expected results:



Use right patternfly package, remove the extra blank line



Additional info:



104.0.5112.79 (Official Build) (64-bit)

            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-3378:
            
             [OVN]Sometimes after reboot egress node, egress IP cannot be applied anymore.
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
Description of problem:




[OVN][OSP] After reboot egress node, egress IP cannot be applied anymore.






Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):




4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-11-07-181244






How reproducible:




Frequently happened in automation. But didn't reproduce it in manual.






Steps to Reproduce:




1. Label one node as egress node

2.
Config one egressIP object
STEP: Check  one EgressIP assigned in the object.

Nov  8 15:28:23.591: INFO: egressIPStatus: [{"egressIP":"192.168.54.72","node":"huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q"}]

3.
Reboot the node, wait for the node ready.







Actual results:




EgressIP cannot be applied anymore. Waited more than 1 hour.
 oc get egressip
NAME             EGRESSIPS       ASSIGNED NODE   ASSIGNED EGRESSIPS
egressip-47031   192.168.54.72    





Expected results:




The egressIP should be applied correctly.





Additional info:





Some logs
E1108 07:29:41.849149       1 egressip.go:1635] No assignable nodes found for EgressIP: egressip-47031 and requested IPs: [192.168.54.72]
I1108 07:29:41.849288       1 event.go:285] Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"EgressIP", Namespace:"", Name:"egressip-47031", UID:"", APIVersion:"", ResourceVersion:"", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning' reason: 'NoMatchingNodeFound' no assignable nodes for EgressIP: egressip-47031, please tag at least one node with label: k8s.ovn.org/egress-assignable


W1108 07:33:37.401149       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:162] Could not connect to huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q (10.131.0.2:9107): context deadline exceeded
I1108 07:33:37.401348       1 master.go:1364] Adding or Updating Node "huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q"
I1108 07:33:37.437465       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q (10.131.0.2:9107)






After this log, seems like no logs related to "192.168.54.72" happened.

            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-4286:
            
             [4.12] ovn-kubernetes ovnkube-master containers crashlooping after 4.11.0-0.okd-2022-10-15-073651 update
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
Description of problem:




The ovn-kubernetes ovnkube-master containers are continuously crashlooping since we updated to 4.11.0-0.okd-2022-10-15-073651.




Log Excerpt:




] [] []  [{kubectl-client-side-apply Update networking.k8s.io/v1 2022-09-12 12:25:06 +0000 UTC FieldsV1 {"f:metadata":{"f:annotations":{".":{},"f:kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration":{}}},"f:spec":{"f:ingress":{},"f:policyTypes":{}}} }]},Spec:NetworkPolicySpec{PodSelector:{map[] []},Ingress:[]NetworkPolicyIngressRule{NetworkPolicyIngressRule{Ports:[]NetworkPolicyPort{},From:[]NetworkPolicyPeer{NetworkPolicyPeer{PodSelector:&v1.LabelSelector{MatchLabels:map[string]string{access: true,},MatchExpressions:[]LabelSelectorRequirement{},},NamespaceSelector:nil,IPBlock:nil,},},},},Egress:[]NetworkPolicyEgressRule{},PolicyTypes:[Ingress],},} &NetworkPolicy{ObjectMeta:{allow-from-openshift-ingress  compsci-gradcentral  a405f843-c250-40d7-8dd4-a759f764f091 217304038 1 2022-09-22 14:36:38 +0000 UTC <nil> <nil> map[] map[] [] []  [{openshift-apiserver Update networking.k8s.io/v1 2022-09-22 14:36:38 +0000 UTC FieldsV1 {"f:spec":{"f:ingress":{},"f:policyTypes":{}}} }]},Spec:NetworkPolicySpec{PodSelector:{map[] []},Ingress:[]NetworkPolicyIngressRule{NetworkPolicyIngressRule{Ports:[]NetworkPolicyPort{},From:[]NetworkPolicyPeer{NetworkPolicyPeer{PodSelector:nil,NamespaceSelector:&v1.LabelSelector{MatchLabels:map[string]string{policy-group.network.openshift.io/ingress: ,},MatchExpressions:[]LabelSelectorRequirement{},},IPBlock:nil,},},},},Egress:[]NetworkPolicyEgressRule{},PolicyTypes:[Ingress],},}]: cannot clean up egress default deny ACL name: error in transact with ops [{Op:mutate Table:Port_Group Row:map[] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[{Column:acls Mutator:delete Value:{GoSet:[{GoUUID:60cb946a-46e9-4623-9ba4-3cb35f018ed6}]}}] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {ccdd01bf-3009-42fb-9672-e1df38190cd7}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:} {Op:mutate Table:Port_Group Row:map[] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[{Column:acls Mutator:delete Value:{GoSet:[{GoUUID:60cb946a-46e9-4623-9ba4-3cb35f018ed6}]}}] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {10bbf229-8c1b-4c62-b36e-4ba0097722db}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:} {Op:delete Table:ACL Row:map[] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {7b55ba0c-150f-4a63-9601-cfde25f29408}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:} {Op:delete Table:ACL Row:map[] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {60cb946a-46e9-4623-9ba4-3cb35f018ed6}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:}] results [{Count:1 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:1 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:1 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:1 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:0 Error:referential integrity violation Details:cannot delete ACL row 7b55ba0c-150f-4a63-9601-cfde25f29408 because of 1 remaining reference(s) UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]}] and errors []: referential integrity violation: cannot delete ACL row 7b55ba0c-150f-4a63-9601-cfde25f29408 because of 1 remaining reference(s)




Additional info:




https://github.com/okd-project/okd/issues/1372

Issue persisted through update to 4.11.0-0.okd-2022-10-28-153352

must-gather: https://nbc9-snips.cloud.duke.edu/snips/must-gather.local.2859117512952590880.zip





            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-3649:
            
             Aggregated jobs failing on not enough alerts test results
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3633. The following is the description of the original issue: 

—

I think something is wrong with the alerts refactor, or perhaps my sync to 4.12.





Failed: suite=[openshift-tests], [sig-instrumentation][Late] Alerts shouldn't report any unexpected alerts in firing or pending state [apigroup:config.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]

Passed 1 times, failed 0 times, skipped 0 times: we require at least 6 attempts to have a chance at success






We're not getting the passes  - from https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/aggregated-azure-ovn-upgrade-4.12-micro-release-openshift-release-analysis-aggregator/1592021681235300352, the successful runs don't show any record of the test at all.  We need to record successes and failures for aggregation to work right.

            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-705:
            
             vSphere privilege checking failing when providing user-defined folder and/or resource pool
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
Description of problem:




vSphere privilege checking failing when providing user-defined folder and/or resource pool




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):




4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-30-054458




How reproducible:




consistently




Steps to Reproduce:




1. Provide pre-existing folder and/or resource pool to the install-config
2. Perform an installation with an account with read only privileges on the datacenter and cluster
3. The installer will fail with missing privileges for the cluster and datacenter.  When a pre-existing folder and resource pool are defined, the account can hold read only privileges on the datacenter and cluster .





Actual results:




Installer reports missing privileges




Expected results:




Installer should succeed




Additional info:




 



            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-7895:
            
             Helm page crashes on old releases with a new Secret
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
Description of problem:

Installed and uninstalled some helm charts, and got now an issue with helm charts on all our releases. The issue is solved in 4.13.



The frontend tries to load /api/helm/releases?ns=christoph and the backend crashes with the error below.



Tl;dr:



It crashes here in the helm lib: https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/release-4.12/vendor/helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver/util.go#L66



And the missing out of bounds check is added on master: https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/master/vendor/helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver/util.go#L66



As part of the helm bump https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12246





2023/02/15 13:09:09 http: panic serving [::1]:43264: runtime error: slice bounds out of range [:3] with capacity 0
goroutine 3291 [running]:                                                                                             
net/http.(*conn).serve.func1()                                                                                                                                                                                                              
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:1850 +0xbf                                                             
panic({0x2f8d700, 0xc0004dfaa0})                                                                                      
        /usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:890 +0x262                                                               
helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver.decodeRelease({0x0?, 0xc000776930?})                  
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/vendor/helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver/util.go:66 +0x305
helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver.(*Secrets).List(0xc000b2ff80, 0xc0004bbe60)                                                                                                                                                              
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/vendor/helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver/secrets.go:95 +0x26f
helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/action.(*List).Run(0xc0005fb800)                                                                  
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/vendor/helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/action/list.go:161 +0xc5
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/helm/actions.ListReleases(0xc00037d680?)                
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/helm/actions/list_releases.go:11 +0x6b
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/helm/handlers.(*helmHandlers).HandleHelmList(0xc00014f000, 0xc000844960, {0x351ae00, 0xc00086d180}, 0x7fea2c6e5900?)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/helm/handlers/handlers.go:154 +0xdb
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/server.(*Server).HTTPHandler.func7.1({0x351ae00?, 0xc00086d180?}, 0x7fea56daf108?)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/server/server.go:286 +0x3c     
net/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0xc0009b8170?, {0x351ae00?, 0xc00086d180?}, 0xc000c5b9f8?)
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2109 +0x2f 
net/http.(*ServeMux).ServeHTTP(0x2f32e80?, {0x351ae00, 0xc00086d180}, 0xc000248800)       
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2487 +0x149
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/server.securityHeadersMiddleware.func1({0x351ae00, 0xc00086d180}, 0x7fea2c5c8248?)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/server/middleware.go:116 +0x3af
net/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0xc0009ed667?, {0x351ae00?, 0xc00086d180?}, 0x109034e?)
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2109 +0x2f
net/http.serverHandler.ServeHTTP({0xc001048120?}, {0x351ae00, 0xc00086d180}, 0xc000248800)
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2947 +0x30c
net/http.(*conn).serve(0xc0007580a0, {0x351cca0, 0xc000145740})
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:1991 +0x607
created by net/http.(*Server).Serve
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:3102 +0x4db
2023/02/15 13:09:09 http: panic serving [::1]:43256: runtime error: slice bounds out of range [:3] with capacity 0
goroutine 3290 [running]:
net/http.(*conn).serve.func1()
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:1850 +0xbf
panic({0x2f8d700, 0xc000273440})
        /usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:890 +0x262
helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver.decodeRelease({0x0?, 0xc0004dc8a0?})
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/vendor/helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver/util.go:66 +0x305
helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver.(*Secrets).List(0xc000de8e88, 0xc0011cb400)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/vendor/helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver/secrets.go:95 +0x26f
helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/action.(*List).Run(0xc00068d800)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/vendor/helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/action/list.go:161 +0xc5
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/helm/actions.ListReleases(0xc00037d680?)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/helm/actions/list_releases.go:11 +0x6b
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/helm/handlers.(*helmHandlers).HandleHelmList(0xc00014f000, 0xc000844960, {0x351ae00, 0xc000b60b60}, 0x7fea2c47e700?)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/helm/handlers/handlers.go:154 +0xdb
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/server.(*Server).HTTPHandler.func7.1({0x351ae00?, 0xc000b60b60?}, 0x7fea56daf5b8?)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/server/server.go:286 +0x3c
net/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0xc0003d72b0?, {0x351ae00?, 0xc000b60b60?}, 0xc000bcd9f8?)
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2109 +0x2f
net/http.(*ServeMux).ServeHTTP(0x2f32e80?, {0x351ae00, 0xc000b60b60}, 0xc000cabd00)
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2487 +0x149
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/server.securityHeadersMiddleware.func1({0x351ae00, 0xc000b60b60}, 0x7fea2c6d9838?)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/server/middleware.go:116 +0x3af
net/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0xc000344f47?, {0x351ae00?, 0xc000b60b60?}, 0x109034e?)
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2109 +0x2f
net/http.serverHandler.ServeHTTP({0xc001048180?}, {0x351ae00, 0xc000b60b60}, 0xc000cabd00)
net/http.(*ServeMux).ServeHTTP(0x2f32e80?, {0x351ae00, 0xc000b60b60}, 0xc000cabd00)                                                                                                                                                         
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2487 +0x149                                                                                                                                                                                  
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/server.securityHeadersMiddleware.func1({0x351ae00, 0xc000b60b60}, 0x7fea2c6d9838?)                                                                                                                         
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/server/middleware.go:116 +0x3af                                                                                                                                                      
net/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0xc000344f47?, {0x351ae00?, 0xc000b60b60?}, 0x109034e?)                                                                                                                                                      
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2109 +0x2f                                                                                                                                                                                   
net/http.serverHandler.ServeHTTP({0xc001048180?}, {0x351ae00, 0xc000b60b60}, 0xc000cabd00)                                                                                                                                                  
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2947 +0x30c                                                                                                                                                                                  
net/http.(*conn).serve(0xc000758000, {0x351cca0, 0xc000145740})                                                                                                                                                                             
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:1991 +0x607                                                                                                                                                                                  
created by net/http.(*Server).Serve
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:3102 +0x4db
2023/02/15 13:09:09 http: panic serving [::1]:42956: runtime error: slice bounds out of range [:3] with capacity 0
goroutine 3261 [running]:
net/http.(*conn).serve.func1()
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:1850 +0xbf
panic({0x2f8d700, 0xc000273740})
        /usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:890 +0x262
helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver.decodeRelease({0x0?, 0xc0005f6000?})
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/vendor/helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver/util.go:66 +0x305
helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver.(*Secrets).List(0xc00094a570, 0xc0003d79e0)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/vendor/helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver/secrets.go:95 +0x26f
helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/action.(*List).Run(0xc00068d800)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/vendor/helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/action/list.go:161 +0xc5
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/helm/actions.ListReleases(0xc00037d680?)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/helm/actions/list_releases.go:11 +0x6b
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/helm/handlers.(*helmHandlers).HandleHelmList(0xc00014f000, 0xc000844960, {0x351ae00, 0xc000b48a80}, 0x7fea2c403300?)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/helm/handlers/handlers.go:154 +0xdb
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/server.(*Server).HTTPHandler.func7.1({0x351ae00?, 0xc000b48a80?}, 0x7fea56dafa68?)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/server/server.go:286 +0x3c
net/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0xc0011cbb60?, {0x351ae00?, 0xc000b48a80?}, 0xc000ff59f8?)
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2109 +0x2f
net/http.(*ServeMux).ServeHTTP(0x2f32e80?, {0x351ae00, 0xc000b48a80}, 0xc0002a3c00)
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2487 +0x149
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/server.securityHeadersMiddleware.func1({0x351ae00, 0xc000b48a80}, 0x7fea2c478e18?)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/server/middleware.go:116 +0x3af
net/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0xc00084bfc7?, {0x351ae00?, 0xc000b48a80?}, 0x109034e?)
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2109 +0x2f
net/http.serverHandler.ServeHTTP({0xc000c3f890?}, {0x351ae00, 0xc000b48a80}, 0xc0002a3c00)
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2947 +0x30c
net/http.(*conn).serve(0xc0008a9f40, {0x351cca0, 0xc000145740})
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:1991 +0x607
created by net/http.(*Server).Serve
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:3102 +0x4db
2023/02/15 13:09:09 http: panic serving [::1]:42954: runtime error: slice bounds out of range [:3] with capacity 0
goroutine 3247 [running]:
net/http.(*conn).serve.func1()
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:1850 +0xbf
panic({0x2f8d700, 0xc000273a88})
        /usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:890 +0x262
helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver.decodeRelease({0x0?, 0xc0005f78f0?})
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/vendor/helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver/util.go:66 +0x305
helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver.(*Secrets).List(0xc000de9560, 0xc0009b8c00)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/vendor/helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver/secrets.go:95 +0x26f
helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/action.(*List).Run(0xc0005fb800)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/vendor/helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/action/list.go:161 +0xc5
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/helm/actions.ListReleases(0xc00037d680?)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/helm/actions/list_releases.go:11 +0x6b
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/helm/handlers.(*helmHandlers).HandleHelmList(0xc00014f000, 0xc000844960, {0x351ae00, 0xc000b60ee0}, 0x7fea2effb100?)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/helm/handlers/handlers.go:154 +0xdb
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/server.(*Server).HTTPHandler.func7.1({0x351ae00?, 0xc000b60ee0?}, 0x7fea56daf5b8?)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/server/server.go:286 +0x3c
net/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0xc0002a91d0?, {0x351ae00?, 0xc000b60ee0?}, 0xc000c319f8?)
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2109 +0x2f
net/http.(*ServeMux).ServeHTTP(0x2f32e80?, {0x351ae00, 0xc000b60ee0}, 0xc000cab000)
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2487 +0x149
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/server.securityHeadersMiddleware.func1({0x351ae00, 0xc000b60ee0}, 0x7fea2eff84e8?)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/server/middleware.go:116 +0x3af
net/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0xc000df4be7?, {0x351ae00?, 0xc000b60ee0?}, 0x109034e?)
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2109 +0x2f
net/http.serverHandler.ServeHTTP({0xc000d2d320?}, {0x351ae00, 0xc000b60ee0}, 0xc000cab000)
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2947 +0x30c
net/http.(*conn).serve(0xc0002688c0, {0x351cca0, 0xc000145740})
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:1991 +0x607
created by net/http.(*Server).Serve
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:3102 +0x4db
2023/02/15 13:09:09 http: panic serving [::1]:55334: runtime error: slice bounds out of range [:3] with capacity 0
goroutine 3328 [running]:
net/http.(*conn).serve.func1()
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:1850 +0xbf
panic({0x2f8d700, 0xc000273dd0})
        /usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:890 +0x262
helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver.decodeRelease({0x0?, 0xc000d0b020?})
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/vendor/helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver/util.go:66 +0x305
helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver.(*Secrets).List(0xc000de98a8, 0xc0001cb670)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/vendor/helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/storage/driver/secrets.go:95 +0x26f
helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/action.(*List).Run(0xc000dad800)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/vendor/helm.sh/helm/v3/pkg/action/list.go:161 +0xc5
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/helm/actions.ListReleases(0xc00037d680?)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/helm/actions/list_releases.go:11 +0x6b
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/helm/handlers.(*helmHandlers).HandleHelmList(0xc00014f000, 0xc000844960, {0x351ae00, 0xc000b610a0}, 0x7fea2effb100?)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/helm/handlers/handlers.go:154 +0xdb
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/server.(*Server).HTTPHandler.func7.1({0x351ae00?, 0xc000b610a0?}, 0x7fea56daf5b8?)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/server/server.go:286 +0x3c
net/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0xc000430260?, {0x351ae00?, 0xc000b610a0?}, 0xc000e469f8?)
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2109 +0x2f
net/http.(*ServeMux).ServeHTTP(0x2f32e80?, {0x351ae00, 0xc000b610a0}, 0xc000537900)
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2487 +0x149
github.com/openshift/console/pkg/server.securityHeadersMiddleware.func1({0x351ae00, 0xc000b610a0}, 0x7fea2c6da648?)
        /home/christoph/git/openshift/console-4.12/pkg/server/middleware.go:116 +0x3af
net/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0xc000df53f7?, {0x351ae00?, 0xc000b610a0?}, 0x109034e?)
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2109 +0x2f
net/http.serverHandler.ServeHTTP({0xc0005f7a10?}, {0x351ae00, 0xc000b610a0}, 0xc000537900)
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2947 +0x30c
net/http.(*conn).serve(0xc000c203c0, {0x351cca0, 0xc000145740})
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:1991 +0x607
created by net/http.(*Server).Serve
        /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:3102 +0x4db







Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.8-4.12 doesn't show a helm release list.

4.13 works fine



How reproducible:

Always with this Helm chart secret:



Steps to Reproduce:

Unable to reproduce this manually again.



But you can apply the Secret at the end to any namespace and test it with that on 4.8-4.12.



Actual results:

Crash



Expected results:

No crash



Additional info:





Secret to reproduce this issue:





kind: Secret
apiVersion: v1
metadata: 
  name: sh.helm.release.v1.dotnet.v1
  labels: 
    name: dotnet
    owner: helm
    status: deployed
    version: '1'
data: 
  release: >-
    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
type: helm.sh/release.v1






Decoded json:





{
  "name": "dotnet",
  "info": {
    "first_deployed": "2023-02-14T23:49:12.655951052+01:00",
    "last_deployed": "2023-02-14T23:49:12.655951052+01:00",
    "deleted": "",
    "description": "Install complete",
    "status": "deployed",
    "notes": "\nYour .NET app is building! To view the build logs, run:\n\noc logs bc/dotnet --follow\n\nNote that your Deployment will report \"ErrImagePull\" and \"ImagePullBackOff\" until the build is complete. Once the build is complete, your image will be automatically rolled out."
  },
  "chart": {
    "metadata": {
      "name": "dotnet",
      "version": "0.0.1",
      "description": "A Helm chart to build and deploy .NET applications",
      "keywords": [
        "runtimes",
        "dotnet"
      ],
      "apiVersion": "v2",
      "annotations": {
        "chart_url": "https://github.com/openshift-helm-charts/charts/releases/download/redhat-dotnet-0.0.1/redhat-dotnet-0.0.1.tgz"
      }
    },
    "lock": null,
    "templates": [
      /* removed */
    ],
    "values": {
      "build": {
        "contextDir": null,
        "enabled": true,
        "env": null,
        "imageStreamTag": {
          "name": "dotnet:3.1",
          "namespace": "openshift",
          "useReleaseNamespace": false
        },
        "output": {
          "kind": "ImageStreamTag",
          "pushSecret": null
        },
        "pullSecret": null,
        "ref": "dotnetcore-3.1",
        "resources": null,
        "startupProject": "app",
        "uri": "https://github.com/redhat-developer/s2i-dotnetcore-ex"
      },
      "deploy": {
        "applicationProperties": {
          "enabled": false,
          "mountPath": "/deployments/config/",
          "properties": "## Properties go here"
        },
        "env": null,
        "envFrom": null,
        "extraContainers": null,
        "initContainers": null,
        "livenessProbe": {
          "tcpSocket": {
            "port": "http"
          }
        },
        "ports": [
          {
            "name": "http",
            "port": 8080,
            "protocol": "TCP",
            "targetPort": 8080
          }
        ],
        "readinessProbe": {
          "httpGet": {
            "path": "/",
            "port": "http"
          }
        },
        "replicas": 1,
        "resources": null,
        "route": {
          "enabled": true,
          "targetPort": "http",
          "tls": {
            "caCertificate": null,
            "certificate": null,
            "destinationCACertificate": null,
            "enabled": true,
            "insecureEdgeTerminationPolicy": "Redirect",
            "key": null,
            "termination": "edge"
          }
        },
        "serviceType": "ClusterIP",
        "volumeMounts": null,
        "volumes": null
      },
      "global": {
        "nameOverride": null
      },
      "image": {
        "name": null,
        "tag": "latest"
      }
    },
    "schema": "removed",
    "files": [
      {
        "name": "README.md",
        "data": "removed"
      }
    ]
  },
  "config": {
    "build": {
      "enabled": true,
      "imageStreamTag": {
        "name": "dotnet:3.1",
        "namespace": "openshift",
        "useReleaseNamespace": false
      },
      "output": {
        "kind": "ImageStreamTag"
      },
      "ref": "dotnetcore-3.1",
      "startupProject": "app",
      "uri": "https://github.com/redhat-developer/s2i-dotnetcore-ex"
    },
    "deploy": {
      "applicationProperties": {
        "enabled": false,
        "mountPath": "/deployments/config/",
        "properties": "## Properties go here"
      },
      "livenessProbe": {
        "tcpSocket": {
          "port": "http"
        }
      },
      "ports": [
        {
          "name": "http",
          "port": 8080,
          "protocol": "TCP",
          "targetPort": 8080
        }
      ],
      "readinessProbe": {
        "httpGet": {
          "path": "/",
          "port": "http"
        }
      },
      "replicas": 1,
      "route": {
        "enabled": true,
        "targetPort": "http",
        "tls": {
          "enabled": true,
          "insecureEdgeTerminationPolicy": "Redirect",
          "termination": "edge"
        }
      },
      "serviceType": "ClusterIP"
    },
    "image": {
      "tag": "latest"
    }
  },
  "manifest": "---\n# Source: dotnet/templates/service.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: dotnet\n  labels:\n    helm.sh/chart: dotnet\n    app.kubernetes.io/name: dotnet\n    app.kubernetes.io/instance: dotnet\n    app.kubernetes.io/managed-by: Helm\n    app.openshift.io/runtime: dotnet\nspec:\n  type: ClusterIP\n  selector:\n    app.kubernetes.io/name: dotnet\n    app.kubernetes.io/instance: dotnet\n  ports:\n    - name: http\n      port: 8080\n      protocol: TCP\n      targetPort: 8080\n---\n# Source: dotnet/templates/deployment.yaml\napiVersion: apps/v1\nkind: Deployment\nmetadata:\n  name: dotnet\n  labels:\n    helm.sh/chart: dotnet\n    app.kubernetes.io/name: dotnet\n    app.kubernetes.io/instance: dotnet\n    app.kubernetes.io/managed-by: Helm\n    app.openshift.io/runtime: dotnet\n  annotations:\n    image.openshift.io/triggers: |-\n      [\n        {\n          \"from\":{\n            \"kind\":\"ImageStreamTag\",\n            \"name\":\"dotnet:latest\"\n          },\n          \"fieldPath\":\"spec.template.spec.containers[0].image\"\n        }\n      ]\nspec:\n  replicas: 1\n  selector:\n    matchLabels:\n      app.kubernetes.io/name: dotnet\n      app.kubernetes.io/instance: dotnet\n  template:\n    metadata:\n      labels:\n        helm.sh/chart: dotnet\n        app.kubernetes.io/name: dotnet\n        app.kubernetes.io/instance: dotnet\n        app.kubernetes.io/managed-by: Helm\n        app.openshift.io/runtime: dotnet\n    spec:\n      containers:\n        - name: web\n          image: dotnet:latest\n          ports:\n            - name: http\n              containerPort: 8080\n              protocol: TCP\n          livenessProbe:\n            tcpSocket:\n              port: http\n          readinessProbe:\n            httpGet:\n              path: /\n              port: http\n          volumeMounts:\n      volumes:\n---\n# Source: dotnet/templates/buildconfig.yaml\napiVersion: build.openshift.io/v1\nkind: BuildConfig\nmetadata:\n  name: dotnet\n  labels:\n    helm.sh/chart: dotnet\n    app.kubernetes.io/name: dotnet\n    app.kubernetes.io/instance: dotnet\n    app.kubernetes.io/managed-by: Helm\n    app.openshift.io/runtime: dotnet\nspec:\n  output:\n    to:\n      kind: ImageStreamTag\n      name: dotnet:latest\n  source:\n    type: Git\n    git:\n      uri: https://github.com/redhat-developer/s2i-dotnetcore-ex\n      ref: dotnetcore-3.1\n  strategy:\n    type: Source\n    sourceStrategy:\n      from:\n        kind: ImageStreamTag\n        name: dotnet:3.1\n        namespace: openshift\n      env:\n        - name: \"DOTNET_STARTUP_PROJECT\"\n          value: \"app\"\n  triggers:\n    - type: ConfigChange\n---\n# Source: dotnet/templates/imagestream.yaml\napiVersion: image.openshift.io/v1\nkind: ImageStream\nmetadata:\n  name: dotnet\n  labels:\n    helm.sh/chart: dotnet\n    app.kubernetes.io/name: dotnet\n    app.kubernetes.io/instance: dotnet\n    app.kubernetes.io/managed-by: Helm\n    app.openshift.io/runtime: dotnet\nspec:\n  lookupPolicy:\n    local: true\n---\n# Source: dotnet/templates/route.yaml\napiVersion: route.openshift.io/v1\nkind: Route\nmetadata:\n  name: dotnet\n  labels:\n    helm.sh/chart: dotnet\n    app.kubernetes.io/name: dotnet\n    app.kubernetes.io/instance: dotnet\n    app.kubernetes.io/managed-by: Helm\n    app.openshift.io/runtime: dotnet\nspec:\n  to:\n    kind: Service\n    name: dotnet\n  port:\n    targetPort: http\n  tls:\n    termination: edge\n    insecureEdgeTerminationPolicy: Redirect\n",
  "version": 1
}




            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-1705:
            
             OVN-Kubernetes master crashing due to too long ACL names during upgrade
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
Description of problem:




OVN-Kubernetes master is crashing during upgrade from 4.11.5 to 4.11.6




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):




4.11.5 to 4.11.6






cannot clean up egress default deny ACL name: cannot update old NetworkPolicy ACLs for namespace ocm-myuser-1urk47c6ti1n94n1spdvo9902as3klar-sd6: error in transact with ops [{Op:update Table:ACL Row:map[action:drop direction:from-lport external_ids:{GoMap:map[default-deny-policy-type:Egress]} log:false match:inport == @a12995145443578534523_egressDefaultDeny meter:{GoSet:[acl-logging]} name:{GoSet:[ocm-myuser-1urk47c6ti1n94n1spdvo9902as3klar-sd6_egressDefaultDeny]} options:{GoMap:map[apply-after-lb:true]} priority:1000 severity:{GoSet:[info]}] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {5277db54-dd96-4c4d-bbed-99142cab91e7}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:}] results [{Count:0 Error:constraint violation Details:"ocm-myuser-1urk47c6ti1n94n1spdvo9902as3klar-sd6_egressDefaultDeny" length 65 is greater than maximum allowed length 63 UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]}] and errors 






            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-2181:
            
             e2e tests: Installs Red Hat Integration - 3scale operator test is failing due to change of Operator name
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-2429:
            
             ReloadInterval E2E test has both incorrect verifications and a race condition
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
Description of problem:




The TestReloadInterval E2E test has completely wrong validations in which the min value should be 1s, not 5s.

But there is a race condition which allow these tests to sometimes pass due to the last test condition.

Therefore, failures in CI are actually correct, and successes are wrong based on the E2E conditions.




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):




4.12




How reproducible:




50%




Steps to Reproduce:




1.Run TestReloadInterval E2E test (make test-e2e TEST=TestReloadInterval)





Actual results:




Sometimes fails on 5us test case:

reloadinterval_test.go:106: router deployment not updated with RELOAD_INTERVAL=5s: timed out waiting for the condition




Expected results:




Should pass E2E




Additional info:




 




 



 



 

            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-4048:
            
             Prometheus doesn't reload TLS certificate and key files on disk
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2873. The following is the description of the original issue: 

—

Description of problem:




Prometheus fails to scrape metrics from the storage operator after some time.





Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):




4.11





How reproducible:




Always





Steps to Reproduce:




1. Install storage operator.
2. Wait for 24h (time for the certificate to be recycled).
3.





Actual results:




Targets being down because Prometheus didn't reload the CA certificate.





Expected results:




Prometheus reloads its client TLS certificate and scrapes the target successfully.





Additional info:









            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-4414:
            
             [OCI feature] registries.conf support in oc mirror
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2851. The following is the description of the original issue: 

—

Description of problem:



The current implementation of registries.conf support is not working as expected. This bug report will outline the expectations of how we believe this should work.


Background



The containers/image project defines a configuration file called registries.conf, which controls how image pulls can be redirected to another registry. Effectively the pull request for a given registry is redirected to another registry which can satisfy the image pull request instead. The specification for the registries.conf file is located here. For tools such as podman and skopeo, this configuration file allows those tools to indicate where images should be pulled from, and the containers/image project rewrites the image reference on the fly and tries to get the image from the first location it can, preferring these "alternate locations" and then falling back to the original location if one of the alternate locations can't satisfy the image request.



An important aspect of this redirection mechanism is it allows the "host:port" and "namespace" portions of the image reference to be redirected. To be clear on the nomenclature used in the registries.conf specification, a namespace refers to zero or more slash separated sections leading up to the image name (which is called repo in the specification and has the tag or digest after it. See repo(:_tag|@digest) below) and the host[:port] refers to the domain where the image registry is being hosted.



Example:




host[:port]/namespace[/namespace…]/repo(:_tag|@digest)





For example, if we have an image called myimage@sha:1234 the and the image normally resides in quay.io/foo/myimage@sha:1234 you could redirect the image pull request to my registry.com/bar/baz/myimage@sha:1234. Note that in this example the alternate registry location is in a different host, and the namespace "path" is different too.


Use Case



In a typical development scenario, image references within an OLM catalog should always point to a production location where the image is intended to be pulled from when a catalog is published publicly. Doing this prevents publishing a catalog which contains image references to internal repositories, which would never be accessible by a customer. By using the registries.conf redirection mechanism, we can perform testing even before the images are officially published to public locations, and we can redirect the image reference from a production location to an internal repository for testing purposes. Below is a simple example of a registries.conf file that redirects image pull requests away from prodlocation.io to preprodlocation.com:




[[registry]]
 location = "prodlocation.io/xx"
 insecure = false
 blocked = false
 mirror-by-digest-only = true
 prefix = ""
 [[registry.mirror]]
  location = "preprodlocation.com/xx"
  insecure = false





Other Considerations


    
	
  • We only care about redirection of images during image pull. Image redirection on push is out of scope.
    • 
	
  • We would like to see as much support for the fields and TOML tables defined in the spec as possible. That being said, there are some items we don't really care about.
	
      
		
    • supported:
		
        
			
      • support multiple [[registry]] TOML tables
        • 
			
      • support multiple [[registry.mirror]] TOML tables for a given [[registry]] TOML table
        • 
			
      • if all entires of [[registry.mirror]] for a given [[registry]] TOML table do not resolve an image, the original [[registry]] TOML locations should be used as the final fallback (this is consistent with how the specification is written, but want to make this point clear. See the specification example which describes how things should work.
        • 
			
      • prefix and location
			
          
				
        • These fields work together, so refer to the specification for how this works. If necessary, we could simplify this to only use location since we are unlikely to use the prefix option.
          • 
			
        
			
        • 
			
      • insecure
			
          
				
        • this should be supported for the [[registry]] and [[registry.mirror]] TOML tables so you know how to access registries. If this is not needed by oc mirror then we can forgo this field.
          • 
			
        
			
        • 
		
      
		
      • 
		
    • fields that require discussion:
		
        
			
      • we assume that digests and tags can be supplied for an image reference, but in the end digests are required for oc mirror to keep track of the image in the workspace. It's not clear if we need to support these configuration options or not:
			
          
				
        • mirror-by-digest-only
				
            
					
          • we assume this is always false since we don't need to prevent an image from being pulled if it is using a tag
            • 
				
          
				
          • 
				
        • pull-from-mirror
				
            
					
          • we assume this is always all since we don't need to prevent an image from being pulled if it is using a tag
            • 
				
          
				
          • 
			
        
			
        • 
		
      
		
      • 
		
    • does not need to be supported:
		
        
			
      • unqualified-search-registries
        • 
			
      • credential-helpers
        • 
			
      • blocked
        • 
			
      • aliases
        • 
		
      
		
      • 
	
    
	
    • 
	
  • we are not interested in supporting version 1 of registries.conf since it is deprecated
    • 





Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):




4.12




How reproducible:




Always





Steps to Reproduce:




oc mirror -c ImageSetConfiguration.yaml --use-oci-feature --oci-feature-action mirror --oci-insecure-signature-policy --oci-registries-config registries.conf --dest-skip-tls docker://localhost:5000/example/test





Example registries.conf




[[registry]]
  prefix = ""
  insecure = false
  blocked = false
  location = "prod.com/abc"
  mirror-by-digest-only = true
  [[registry.mirror]]
    location = "internal.exmaple.io/cp"
    insecure = false
[[registry]]
  prefix = ""
  insecure = false
  blocked = false
  location = "quay.io"
  mirror-by-digest-only = true
  [[registry.mirror]]
    location = "internal.exmaple.io/abcd"
    insecure = false





 



Actual results:




images are not pulled from "internal" registry





Expected results:




images should be pulled from "internal" registry





Additional info:



The current implementation in oc mirror creates its own structs to approximate the ones provided by the containers/image project, but it might not be necessary to do that. Since the oc mirror project already uses containers/image as a dependency, it could leverage the FindRegistry function, which takes a image reference, loads the registries.conf information and returns the most appropriate [[registry]] reference (in the form of Registry struct) or nil if no match was found. Obviously custom processing will be necessary to do something useful with the Registry instance. Using this code is not a requirement, just a suggestion of another possible path to load the configuration.

            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-10531:
            
             [release-4.12] Fix of ServiceAccounts gathering
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10239. The following is the description of the original issue: 

—

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-8082. The following is the description of the original issue: 

—

Description of problem:




Currently during the gathering some of the ServiceAccounts were lost. This tasks fixes that problem.




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):




 




How reproducible:




 




Steps to Reproduce:




1.
2.
3.





Actual results:




 




Expected results:




 




Additional info:




 



            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-1896:
            
             [CORS-2260] "create install-config" got error 'credentialsMode: Forbidden: environmental authentication is only supported with Manual credentials mode'
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
Description of problem:




failed even trying to "create install-config" in the epic's scenario




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):




$ ./openshift-install version
./openshift-install 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419
built from commit 9eb0224926982cdd6cae53b872326292133e532d
release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc
release architecture amd64





How reproducible:




Always




Steps to Reproduce:




1. create vpc network, subnets, and a firewall-rule to allow ssh access to the bastion host
2. create the bastion host, with setting a valid service-account and scopes of "https://www.googleapis.com/auth/cloud-platform"
3. scp pull secret to the bastion host
4. ssh to the bastion host (subsequent steps would be on the bastion host, except told explicitly)
5. get "oc", e.g. curl https://mirror2.openshift.com/pub/openshift-v4/clients/ocp/4.9.9/openshift-client-linux-4.9.9.tar.gz -o openshift-client-linux-4.9.9.tar.gz; tar zxvf openshift-client-linux-4.9.9.tar.gz
6. obtain the installation program
7. try "create install-config" of platform "gcp" 




Actual results:




[cloud-user@jiwei-0930-02-rhel8-mirror ~]$ ./openshift-install create install-config --dir work                                         
? SSH Public Key /home/cloud-user/.ssh/id_rsa.pub                                                                                       
? Platform gcp                                                                                                                          
INFO Credentials loaded from gcloud CLI defaults                                                                                        
? Project ID OpenShift QE Shared VPC (openshift-qe-shared-vpc)                                                                          
? Region us-west1                                                                                                                       
? Base Domain qe-shared-vpc.qe.gcp.devcluster.openshift.com                                                                             
? Cluster Name jiwei-0930-03                                                                                                            
? Pull Secret [? for help] ******
FATAL failed to fetch Install Config: failed to generate asset "Install Config": credentialsMode: Forbidden: environmental authentication is only supported with Manual credentials mode 
[cloud-user@jiwei-0930-02-rhel8-mirror ~]$ 





Expected results:




"create install-config" should succeed.




Additional info:




 




 



 



 



 

            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-3881:
            
             Revert Catalog PSA decisions for 4.12
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
Description of problem:




See: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CPSYN-143

tldr:  Based on the previous direction that 4.12 was going to enforce PSA restricted by default, OLM had to make a few changes because the way we run catalog pods (and we have to run them that way because of how the opm binary worked) was incompatible w/ running restricted.

1) We set openshift-marketplace to enforce restricted (this was our choice, we didn't have to do it, but we did)
2) we updated the opm binary so catalog images using a newer opm binary don't have to run privileged
3) we added a field to catalogsource that allows you to choose whether to run the pod privileged(legacy mode) or restricted.  The default is restricted.  We made that the default so that users running their own catalogs in their own NSes (which would be default PSA enforcing) would be able to be successful w/o needing their NS upgraded to privileged.

Unfortunately this means:
1) legacy catalog images(i.e. using older opm binaries) won't run on 4.12 by default (the catalogsource needs to be modified to specify legacy mode.
2) legacy catalog images cannot be run in the openshift-marketplace NS since that NS does not allow privileged pods.  This means legacy catalogs can't contribute to the global catalog (since catalogs must be in that NS to be in the global catalog).

Before 4.12 ships we need to:
1) remove the PSA restricted label on the openshift-marketplace NS
2) change the catalogsource securitycontextconfig mode default to use "legacy" as the default, not restricted.

This gives catalog authors another release to update to using a newer opm binary that can run restricted, or get their NSes explicitly labeled as privileged (4.12 will not enforce restricted, so in 4.12 using the legacy mode will continue to work)

In 4.13 we will need to revisit what we want the default to be, since at that point catalogs will start breaking if they try to run in legacy mode in most NSes.







Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):










How reproducible:










Steps to Reproduce:




1.
2.
3.





Actual results:










Expected results:










Additional info:









            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-5513:
            
             [Azure/ARO: 4.12 backport] Update Azure SDK to v63.1.0+incompatible 
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
Description of problem:




Currently openshift-installer and ARO installer have diverged in code bases. In effort from the ARO team to be able to reduce/remove this, the we are patching openshift-installer.

ARO uses a newer version of the Azure SDK. We need to backport this change to previous versions of openshift-installer




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):




See affected versions




How reproducible:




N/A




Steps to Reproduce:




N/A





Actual results:




N/A




Expected results:




N/A




Additional info:




 



            

          

          
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

      

        

        

      

    

    

  
  

    

      

        

          

            
            Bug 
            
            
            OCPBUGS-650:
            
             "opm alpha render-veneer semver" raise error when no "Candidate" in config yaml
          

          
          
          

            
            
            
            
            
            
            
          

          
          

            

              
Description of problem:




"opm alpha render-veneer semver" raise error when no "Candidate" in config yaml




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):




zhaoxia@xzha-mac semver % opm version
Version: version.Version{OpmVersion:"11644a543", GitCommit:"11644a5433442c33698d2eee8d3f865b0d9386c0", BuildDate:"2022-08-29T08:16:54Z", GoOs:"darwin", GoArch:"amd64"}




How reproducible:




always




Steps to Reproduce:




1. prepare catalog-semver-veneer-wrong.yaml 
zhaoxia@xzha-mac semver % cat catalog-semver-veneer-wrong.yaml 
Schema: olm.semver
GenerateMajorChannels: false
GenerateMinorChannels: true
Stable:
  Bundles:
  - Image: quay.io/olmqe/nginxolm-operator-bundle:v1.0.2
  - Image: quay.io/olmqe/nginxolm-operator-bundle:v2.1.0
Fast:
  Bundles:
  - Image: quay.io/olmqe/nginxolm-operator-bundle:v0.0.1
  - Image: quay.io/olmqe/nginxolm-operator-bundle:v2.0.1
  - Image: quay.io/olmqe/nginxolm-operator-bundle:v2.1.0 

2. ru