Back to index

4.12.0-rc.7

Jump to: Complete Features | Incomplete Features | Complete Epics | Incomplete Epics | Other Complete | Other Incomplete |

Changes from 4.11.59

Note: this page shows the Feature-Based Change Log for a release

Complete Features

These features were completed when this image was assembled

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Add runbook_url to alerts in the OCP UI

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
If an alert includes a runbook_url label, then it should appear in the UI for the alert as a link.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
Customer can easily reach the alert runbook and be able to address their issues.

4. List any affected packages or components.

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Rebase OpenShift components to k8s v1.24

Why is this important?

  • Rebasing ensures components work with the upcoming release of Kubernetes
  • Address tech debt related to upstream deprecations and removals.

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. k8s 1.24 release

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Epic Goal

  • Rebase cluster autoscaler on top of Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Need to pick up latest upstream changes

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a user I would like to see all the events that the autoscaler creates, even duplicates. Having the CAO set this flag will allow me to continue to see these events.

Background

We have carried a patch for the autoscaler that would enable the duplication of events. This patch can now be dropped because the upstream added a flag for this behavior in https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/pull/4921

Steps

  • add the --record-duplicated-events flag to all autoscaler deployments from the CAO

Stakeholders

  • openshift eng

Definition of Done

  • autoscaler continues to work as expected and produces events for everything
  • Docs
  • this does not require documentation as it preserves existing behavior and provides no interface for user interaction
  • Testing
  • current tests should continue to pass

Incomplete Features

When this image was assembled, these features were not yet completed. Therefore, only the Jira Cards included here are part of this release

Epic Goal

  • Enabling integration of single hub cluster to install both ARM and x86 spoke clusters
  • Enabling support for heterogeneous OCP clusters
  • document requirements deployment flows
  • support in disconnected environment

Why is this important?

  • clients request

Scenarios

  1. Users manage both ARM and x86 machines, we should not require to have two different hub clusters
  2. Users manage a mixed architecture clusters without requirement of all the nodes to be of the same architecture

Acceptance Criteria

  • Process is well documented
  • we are able to install in a disconnected environment

We have a set of images

  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-agent:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-controller:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer:latest

that should become multiarch images. This should be done both in upstream and downstream.

As a reference, we have built internally those images as multiarch and made them available as

  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

They can be consumed by the Assisted Serivce pod via the following env

    - name: AGENT_DOCKER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
    - name: CONTROLLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
    - name: INSTALLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

OLM would have to support a mechanism like podAffinity which allows multiple architecture values to be specified which enables it to pin operators to the matching architecture worker nodes

Ref: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1014

 

Cut a new release of the OLM API and update OLM API dependency version (go.mod) in OLM package; then
Bring the upstream changes from OLM-2674 to the downstream olm repo.

A/C:

 - New OLM API version release
 - OLM API dependency updated in OLM Project
 - OLM Subscription API changes  downstreamed
 - OLM Controller changes  downstreamed
 - Changes manually tested on Cluster Bot

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

  • Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
  • Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

  • Core Networking Stability
  • Core Networking Performance and Scale
  • Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
  • Core Networking UX (Observability)
  • Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

  • Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
  • SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
  • Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

  • CNV
  • Service Mesh
  • CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Goal: Provide queryable metrics and telemetry for cluster routes and sharding in an OpenShift cluster.

Problem: Today we test OpenShift performance and scale with best-guess or anecdotal evidence for the number of routes that our customers use. Best practices for a large number of routes in a cluster is to shard, however we have no visibility with regard to if and how customers are using sharding.

Why is this important? These metrics will inform our performance and scale testing, documented cluster limits, and how customers are using sharding for best practice deployments.

Dependencies (internal and external):

Prioritized epics + deliverables (in scope / not in scope):

Not in scope:

Estimate (XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL):

Previous Work:

Open questions:

Acceptance criteria:

Epic Done Checklist:

  • CI - CI Job & Automated tests: <link to CI Job & automated tests>
  • Release Enablement: <link to Feature Enablement Presentation> 
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR orf GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
  • Notes for Done Checklist
    • Adding links to the above checklist with multiple teams contributing; select a meaningful reference for this Epic.
    • Checklist added to each Epic in the description, to be filled out as phases are completed - tracking progress towards “Done” for the Epic.

Description:

As described in the Metrics to be sent via telemetry section of the Design Doc, the following metrics is needed to be sent from OpenShift cluster to Red Hat premises:

  • Minimum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:min  : min(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the minimum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Maximum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:max  : max(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the maximum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Average Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:avg  : avg(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the average value of Routes per Shard.
  • Median Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:median  : quantile(0.5, route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the median value of Routes per Shard.
  • Number of Routes summed by TLS Termination type
    • Recording Rule – cluster:openshift_route_info:tls_termination:sum : sum (openshift_route_info) by (tls_termination)
    • Gives the number of Routes for each tls_termination value. The possible values for tls_termination are edge, passthrough and reencrypt. 

The metrics should be allowlisted on the cluster side.

The steps described in Sending metrics via telemetry are needed to be followed. Specifically step 5.

Depends on CFE-478.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for sending the above mentioned metrics from OpenShift clusters to the Red Hat premises by allowlisting metrics on the cluster side

Description:

As described in the Design Doc, the following information is needed to be exported from Cluster Ingress Operator:

  • Number of routes/shard

Design 2 will be implemented as part of this story.

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for exporting the above mentioned metrics by Cluster Ingress Operator

Epic Goal

  • Make it possible to disable the console operator at install time, while still having a supported+upgradeable cluster.

Why is this important?

  • It's possible to disable console itself using spec.managementState in the console operator config. There is no way to remove the console operator, though. For clusters where an admin wants to completely remove console, we should give the option to disable the console operator as well.

Scenarios

  1. I'm an administrator who wants to minimize my OpenShift cluster footprint and who does not want the console installed on my cluster

Acceptance Criteria

  • It is possible at install time to opt-out of having the console operator installed. Once the cluster comes up, the console operator is not running.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Composable cluster installation

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1srswUYYHIbKT5PAC5ZuVos9T2rBnf7k0F1WV2zKUTrA/edit#heading=h.mduog8qznwz
  2. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1U2zYAyrNGBooGBuyQME8Xn905RvOPbVv3XFw3stddZw/edit#slide=id.g10555cc0639_0_7

Open questions::

  1. The console operator manages the downloads deployment as well. Do we disable the downloads deployment? Long term we want to move to CLI manager: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/6ae78842d4a87593c63274e02ac7a33cc7f296c3/enhancements/oc/cli-manager.md

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

In the console-operator repo we need to add `capability.openshift.io/console` annotation to all the manifests that the operator either contains creates on the fly.

 

Manifests are currently present in /bindata and /manifest directories.

 

Here is example of the insights-operator change.

Here is the overall enhancement doc.

 

This is a epic bucket for all activities surrounding the creation of declarative approach to release and maintain OLM catalogs.

Epic Goal

  • Allow Operator Authors to easily change the layout of the update graph in a single location so they can version/maintain/release it via git and have more approachable controls about graph vertices than today's replaces, skips and/or skipRange taxonomy
  • Allow Operators authors to have control over channel and bundle channel membership

Why is this important?

  • The imperative catalog maintenance approach so far with opm is being moved to a declarative format (OLM-2127 and OLM-1780) moving away from bundle-level controls but the update graph properties are still attached to a bundle
  • We've received feedback from the RHT internal developer community that maintaining and reasoning about the graph in the context of a single channel is still too hard, even with visualization tools
  • making the update graph easily changeable is important to deliver on some of the promises of declarative index configuration
  • The current interface for declarative index configuration still relies on skips, skipRange and replaces to shape the graph on a per-bundle level - this is too complex at a certain point with a lot of bundles in channels, we need to something at the package level

Scenarios

  1. An Operator author wants to release a new version replacing the latest version published previously
  2. After additional post-GA testing an Operator author wants to establish a new update path to an existing released version from an older, released version
  3. After finding a bug post-GA an Operator author wants to temporarily remove a known to be problematic update path
  4. An automated system wants to push a bundle inbetween an existing update path as a result of an Operator (base) image rebuild (Freshmaker use case)
  5. A user wants to take a declarative graph definition and turn it into a graphical image for visually ensuring the graph looks like they want
  6. An Operator author wants to promote a certain bundle to an additional / different channel to indicate progress in maturity of the operator.

Acceptance Criteria

  • The declarative format has to be user readable and terse enough to make quick modifications
  • The declarative format should be machine writeable (Freshmaker)
  • The update graph is declared and modified in a text based format aligned with the declarative config
  • it has to be possible to add / removes edges at the leave of the graph (releasing/unpublishing a new version)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new vertices between existing edges (releasing/retracting a new update path)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new edges in between existing vertices (releasing/unpublishing a version inbetween, freshmaker user case)
  • it has to be possible to change the channel member ship of a bundle after it's published (channel promotion)
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • it has to be possible to add additional metadata later to implement OLM-2087 and OLM-259 if required

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-2127)

Previous Work:

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-1780)

Related work

Open questions:

  1. What other manipulation scenarios are required?
    1. Answer: deprecation of content in the spirit of OLM-2087
    2. Answer: cross-channel update hints as described in OLM-2059 if that implementation requires it

 

When working on this Epic, it's important to keep in mind this other potentially related Epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OLM-2276

 

enhance the veneer rendering to be able to read the input veneer data from stdin, via a pipe, in a manner similar to https://dev.to/napicella/linux-pipes-in-golang-2e8j

then the command could be used in a manner similar to many k8s examples like

```shell
opm alpha render-veneer semver -o yaml < infile > outfile
```

Upstream issue link: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-registry/issues/1011

Jira Description

As an OPM maintainer, I want to downstream the PR for (OCP 4.12 ) and backport it to OCP 4.11 so that IIB will NOT be impacted by the changes when it upgrades the OPM version to use the next/future opm upstream release (v1.25.0).

Summary / Background

IIB(the downstream service that manages the indexes) uses the upstream version and if they bump the OPM version to the next/future (v1.25.0) release with this change before having the downstream images updated then: the process to manage the indexes downstream will face issues and it will impact the distributions. 

Acceptance Criteria

  • The changes in the PR are available for the releases which uses FBC -> OCP 4.11, 4.12

Definition of Ready

  • PRs merged into downstream OCP repos branches 4.11/4.12

Definition of Done

  • We checked that the downstream images are with the changes applied (i.e.: we can try to verify in the same way that we checked if the changes were in the downstream for the fix OLM-2639 )

Feature Overview
Provide CSI drivers to replace all the intree cloud provider drivers we currently have. These drivers will probably be released as tech preview versions first before being promoted to GA.

Goals

  • Framework for rapid creation of CSI drivers for our cloud providers
  • CSI driver for AWS EBS
  • CSI driver for AWS EFS
  • CSI driver for GCP
  • CSI driver for Azure
  • CSI driver for VMware vSphere
  • CSI Driver for Azure Stack
  • CSI Driver for Alicloud
  • CSI Driver for IBM Cloud

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Framework for CSI driver  TBD Yes
Drivers should be available to install both in disconnected and connected mode   Yes
Drivers should upgrade from release to release without any impact   Yes
Drivers should be installable via CVO (when in-tree plugin exists)    

Out of Scope

This work will only cover the drivers themselves, it will not include

  • enhancements to the CSI API framework
  • the migration to said drivers from the the intree drivers
  • work for non-cloud provider storage drivers (FC-SAN, iSCSI) being converted to CSI drivers

Background, and strategic fit
In a future Kubernetes release (currently 1.21) intree cloud provider drivers will be deprecated and replaced with CSI equivalents, we need the drivers created so that we continue to support the ecosystems in an appropriate way.

Assumptions

  • Storage SIG won't move out the changeover to a later Kubernetes release

Customer Considerations
Customers will need to be able to use the storage they want.

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: cluster admins
  • Updated content: update storage docs to show how to use these drivers (also better expose the capabilities)

This Epic is to track the GA of this feature

Goal

  • Make available the Google Cloud File Service via a CSI driver, it is desirable that this implementation has dynamic provisioning
  • Without GCP filestore support, we are limited to block / RWO only (GCP PD 4.8 GA)
  • Align with what we support on other major public cloud providers.

Why is this important?

  • There is a know storage gap with google cloud where only block is supported
  • More customers deploying on GCE and asking for file / RWX storage.

Scenarios

  1. Install the CSI driver
  2. Remove the CSI Driver
  3. Dynamically provision a CSI Google File PV*
  4. Utilise a Google File PV
  5. Assess optional features such as resize & snapshot

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Customers::

  • Telefonica Spain
  • Deutsche Bank

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an OCP user, I want images for GCP Filestore CSI Driver and Operator, so that I can install them on my cluster and utilize GCP Filestore shares.

We need to continue to maintain specific areas within storage, this is to capture that effort and track it across releases.

Goals

  • To allow OCP users and cluster admins to detect problems early and with as little interaction with Red Hat as possible.
  • When Red Hat is involved, make sure we have all the information we need from the customer, i.e. in metrics / telemetry / must-gather.
  • Reduce storage test flakiness so we can spot real bugs in our CI.

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Telemetry   No
Certification   No
API metrics   No
     

Out of Scope

n/a

Background, and strategic fit
With the expected scale of our customer base, we want to keep load of customer tickets / BZs low

Assumptions

Customer Considerations

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: internal
  • Updated content: none at this time.

Notes

In progress:

  • CI flakes:
    • Configurable timeouts for e2e tests
      • Azure is slow and times out often
      • Cinder times out formatting volumes
      • AWS resize test times out

 

High prio:

  • Env. check tool for VMware - users often mis-configure permissions there and blame OpenShift. If we had a tool they could run, it might report better errors.
    • Should it be part of the installer?
    • Spike exists
  • Add / use cloud API call metrics
    • Helps customers to understand why things are slow
    • Helps build cop to understand a flake
      • With a post-install step that filters data from Prometheus that’s still running in the CI job.
    • Ideas:
      • Cloud is throttling X% of API calls longer than Y seconds
      • Attach / detach / provisioning / deletion / mount / unmount / resize takes longer than X seconds?
    • Capture metrics of operations that are stuck and won’t finish.
      • Sweep operation map from executioner???
      • Report operation metric into the highest bucket after the bucket threshold (i.e. if 10minutes is the last bucket, report an operation into this bucket after 10 minutes and don’t wait for its completion)?
      • Ask the monitoring team?
    • Include in CSI drivers too.
      • With alerts too

Unsorted

  • As the number of storage operators grows, it would be grafana board for storage operators
    • CSI driver metrics (from CSI sidecars + the driver itself  + its operator?)
    • CSI migration?
  • Get aggregated logs in cluster
    • They're rotated too soon
    • No logs from dead / restarted pods
    • No tools to combine logs from multiple pods (e.g. 3 controller managers)
  • What storage issues customers have? it was 22% of all issues.
    • Insufficient docs?
    • Probably garbage
  • Document basic storage troubleshooting for our supports
    • What logs are useful when, what log level to use
    • This has been discussed during the GSS weekly team meeting; however, it would be beneficial to have this documented.
  • Common vSphere errors, their debugging and fixing. 
  • Document sig-storage flake handling - not all failed [sig-storage] tests are ours

Epic Goal

  • Update all images that we ship with OpenShift to the latest upstream releases and libraries.
  • Exact content of what needs to be updated will be determined as new images are released upstream, which is not known at the beginning of OCP development work. We don't know what new features will be included and should be tested and documented. Especially new CSI drivers releases may bring new, currently unknown features. We expect that the amount of work will be roughly the same as in the previous releases. Of course, QE or docs can reject an update if it's too close to deadline and/or looks too big.

Traditionally we did these updates as bugfixes, because we did them after the feature freeze (FF). Trying no-feature-freeze in 4.12. We will try to do as much as we can before FF, but we're quite sure something will slip past FF as usual.

Why is this important?

  • We want to ship the latest software that contains new features and bugfixes.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update all OCP and kubernetes libraries in storage operators to the appropriate version for OCP release.

This includes (but is not limited to):

  • Kubernetes:
    • client-go
    • controller-runtime
  • OCP:
    • library-go
    • openshift/api
    • openshift/client-go
    • operator-sdk

Operators:

  • aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator 
  • aws-efs-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-file-csi-driver-operator
  • openstack-cinder-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-filestore-csi-driver-operator
  • manila-csi-driver-operator
  • ovirt-csi-driver-operator
  • vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator
  • alibaba-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator
  • csi-driver-shared-resource-operator

 

  • cluster-storage-operator
  • csi-snapshot-controller-operator
  • local-storage-operator
  • vsphere-problem-detector

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

This includes ibm-vpc-node-label-updater!

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

There is a new driver release 5.0.0 since the last rebase that includes snapshot support:

https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver/releases/tag/v5.0.0

Rebase the driver on v5.0.0 and update the deployments in ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator.
There are no corresponding changes in ibm-vpc-node-label-updater since the last rebase.

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

The End of General support for vSphere 6.7 will be on October 15, 2022. So, vSphere 6.7 will be deprecated for 4.11.

We want to encourage vSphere customers to upgrade to vSphere 7 in OCP 4.11 since VMware is EOLing (general support) for vSphere 6.7 in Oct 2022.

We want the cluster Upgradeable=false + have a strong alert pointing to our docs / requirements.

related slack: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CH06KMDRV/p1647541493096729

Epic Goal

  • Enable the migration from a storage intree driver to a CSI based driver with minimal impact to the end user, applications and cluster
  • These migrations would include, but are not limited to:
    • CSI driver for AWS EBS
    • CSI driver for GCP
    • CSI driver for Azure (file and disk)
    • CSI driver for VMware vSphere

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift needs to maintain it's ability to enable PVCs and PVs of the main storage types
  • CSI Migration is getting close to GA, we need to have the feature fully tested and enabled in OpenShift
  • Upstream intree drivers are being deprecated to make way for the CSI drivers prior to intree driver removal

Scenarios

  1. User initiated move to from intree to CSI driver
  2. Upgrade initiated move from intree to CSI driver
  3. Upgrade from EUS to EUS

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

This Epic tracks the GA of this feature

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift needs to maintain it's ability to enable PVCs and PVs of the main storage types
  • CSI Migration is getting close to GA, we need to have the feature fully tested and enabled in OpenShift
  • Upstream intree drivers are being deprecated to make way for the CSI drivers prior to intree driver removal

Scenarios

  1. User initiated move to from intree to CSI driver
  2. Upgrade initiated move from intree to CSI driver
  3. Upgrade from EUS to EUS

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

On new installations, we should make the StorageClass created by the CSI operator the default one. 

However, we shouldn't do that on an upgrade scenario. The main reason is that users might have set  a different quota on the CSI driver Storage Class.

Exit criteria:

  • New clusters get the CSI Storage Class as the default one.
  • Existing clusters don't get their default Storage Classes changed.
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

On new installations, we should make the StorageClass created by the CSI operator the default one. 

However, we shouldn't do that on an upgrade scenario. The main reason is that users might have set  a different quota on the CSI driver Storage Class.

Exit criteria:

  • New clusters get the CSI Storage Class as the default one.
  • Existing clusters don't get their default Storage Classes changed.

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

  1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
  2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
  3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.


Relevant links:

Epic Goal

  • Change the default value for the spec.tuningOptions.maxConnections field in the IngressController API, which configures the HAProxy maxconn setting, to 50000 (fifty thousand).

Why is this important?

  • The maxconn setting constrains the number of simultaneous connections that HAProxy accepts. Beyond this limit, the kernel queues incoming connections. 
  • Increasing maxconn enables HAProxy to queue incoming connections intelligently.  In particular, this enables HAProxy to respond to health probes promptly while queueing other connections as needed.
  • The default setting of 20000 has been in place since OpenShift 3.5 was released in April 2017 (see BZ#1405440, commit, RHBA-2017:0884). 
  • Hardware capabilities have increased over time, and the current default is too low for typical modern machine sizes. 
  • Increasing the default setting improves HAProxy's performance at an acceptable cost in the common case. 

Scenarios

  1. As a cluster administrator who is installing OpenShift on typical hardware, I want OpenShift router to be tuned appropriately to take advantage of my hardware's capabilities.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI is passing. 
  • The new default setting is clearly documented. 
  • A release note informs cluster administrators of the change to the default setting. 

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. None.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. The  haproxy-max-connections-tuning enhancement made maxconn configurable without changing the default.  The enhancement document details the tradeoffs in terms of memory for various settings of nbthreads and maxconn with various numbers of routes. 

Open questions::

  1. ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

 

OCP/Telco Definition of Done

Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • This regression is a major performance and stability issue and it has happened once before.

Drawbacks

  • The E2E test may be complex due to trying to determine what DNS pods are responding to DNS requests. This is straightforward using the chaos plugin.

Scenarios

  • CI Testing

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. SDN Team

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. N/A

Open questions::

  1. Where do these E2E test go? SDN Repo? DNS Repo?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Enable the chaos plugin https://coredns.io/plugins/chaos/ in our CoreDNS configuration so that we can use a DNS query to easily identify what DNS pods are responding to our requests.

Feature Overview

  • This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary
  • Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

 

Goals

  • This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature

 

Requirements

  • This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

 

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

  • Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
  • Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
  • ...

 

Questions to answer…

  • ...

 

Out of Scope

 

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

 

Assumptions

  • ...

 

Customer Considerations

  • ...

 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?  
  • New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

As a console user I want to have option to:

  • Restart Deployment
  • Retry latest DeploymentConfig if it failed

 

For Deployments we will add the 'Restart rollout' action button. This action will PATCH the Deployment object's 'spec.template.metadata.annotations' block, by adding 'openshift.io/restartedAt: <actual-timestamp>' annotation. This will restart the deployment, by creating a new ReplicaSet.

  • action is disabled if:
    • Deployment is paused

 

For DeploymentConfig we will add 'Retry rollout' action button.  This action will PATCH the latest revision of ReplicationController object's 'metadata.annotations' block by setting 'openshift.io/deployment/phase: "New"' and removing openshift.io/deployment.cancelled and openshift.io/deployment.status-reason.

  • action is enabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Failed phase
  • action is disabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Complete phase
    • DeploymentConfig does not have any rollouts
    • DeploymentConfigs is paused

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add the 'Restart rollout' action button for the Deployment resource to both action menu and kebab menu
  • Add the 'Retry rollout' action button for the DeploymentConfig resource to both action menu and kebab menu

 

BACKGROUND:

OpenShift console will be updated to allow rollout restart deployment from the console itself.

Currently, from the OpenShift console, for the resource “deploymentconfigs” we can only start and pause the rollout, and for the resource “deployment” we can only resume the rollout. None of the resources (deployment & deployment config) has this option to restart the rollout. So, that is the reason why the customer wants this functionality to perform the same action from the CLI as well as the OpenShift console.

The customer wants developers who are not fluent with the oc tool and terminal utilities, can use the console instead of the terminal to restart deployment, just like we use to do it through CLI using the command “oc rollout restart deploy/<deployment-name>“.
Usually when developers change the config map that deployment uses they have to restart pods. Currently, the developers have to use the oc rollout restart deployment command. The customer wants the functionality to get this button/menu to perform the same action from the console as well.

Design
Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i-jGtQGaA0OI4CYh8DH5BBIVbocIu_dxNt3vwWmPZdw/edit

When OCP is performing cluster upgrade user should be notified about this fact.

There are two possibilities how to surface the cluster upgrade to the users:

  • Display a console notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Global notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Have an alert firing for all the users of OCP stating the cluster is undergoing an upgrade. 

 

AC:

  • Console-operator will create a ConsoleNotification CR when the cluster is being upgraded. Once the upgrade is done console-operator will remote that CR. These are the three statuses based on which we are determining if the cluster is being upgraded.
  • Add unit tests

 

Note: We need to decide if we want to distinguish this particular notification by a different color? ccing Ali Mobrem 

 

Created from: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RFE-3024

As a developer, I want to make status.HostIP for Pods visible in the Pod details page of the OCP Web Console. Currently there is no way to view the node IP for a Pod in the OpenShift Web Console.  When viewing a Pod in the console, the field status.HostIP is not visible.

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Make pod's HostIP field visible in the pod details page, similarly to PodIP field

Feature Overview

  • As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.
  • As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

  • Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

  • Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
  • Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
  • Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
  • Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
  • In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
  • For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
  • Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
  • The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
  • The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

  • As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
  • As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
  • As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
  • As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
  • As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

  •  

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

  • As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
  • As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

  • This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

  1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
  2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
  3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

 

References

 

 

Set the ClusterDeployment CRD to deploy OpenShift in FIPS mode and make sure that after deployment the cluster is set in that mode

In order to install FIPS compliant clusters, we need to make sure that installconfig + agentoconfig based deployments take into account the FIPS config in installconfig.

This task is about passing the config to agentclusterinstall so it makes it into the iso. Once there, AGENT-374 will give it to assisted service

Epic Goal

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with dual-stack IPv4/IPv6

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with single-stack IPv6

Why is this important?

IPv6 and dual-stack clusters are requested often by customers, especially from Telco customers. Working with dual-stack clusters is a requirement for many but also a transition into a single-stack IPv6 clusters, which for some of our users is the final destination.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Agent-based installer can deploy IPv6 clusters
  • Agent-based installer can deploy dual-stack clusters
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Previous Work

Karim's work proving how agent-based can deploy IPv6: IPv6 deploy with agent based installer]

Done Checklist * CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.

  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>|

For dual-stack installations the agent-cluster-install.yaml must have both an IPv4 and IPv6 subnet in the networkking.MachineNetwork or assisted-service will throw an error. This field is in InstallConfig but it must be added to agent-cluster-install in its Generate().

For IPv4 and IPv6 installs, setting up the MachineNetwork is not needed but it also does not cause problems if its set, so it should be fine to set it all times.

Epic Goal

As an OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy a cluster zero with RHACM or MCE and have the required components installed when the installation is completed

Why is this important?

BILLI makes it easier to deploy a cluster zero. BILLI users know at installation time what the purpose of their cluster is when they plan the installation. Day-2 steps are necessary to install operators and users, especially when automating installations, want to finish the installation flow when their required components are installed.

Acceptance Criteria

  • A user can provide MCE manifests and have it installed without additional manual steps after the installation is completed
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

Feature Overview

Add GA support for deploying OpenShift to IBM Public Cloud

Goals

Complete the existing gaps to make OpenShift on IBM Cloud VPC (Next Gen2) General Available

Requirements

Optional requirements

  • OpenShift can be deployed using Mint mode and STS for cloud provider credentials (future release, tbd)
  • OpenShift can be deployed in disconnected mode https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SPLAT-737)
  • OpenShift on IBM Cloud supports User Provisioned Infrastructure (UPI) deployment method (future release, 4.14?)

Epic Goal

  • Enable installation of private clusters on IBM Cloud. This epic will track associated work.

Why is this important?

  • This is required MVP functionality to achieve GA.

Scenarios

  1. Install a private cluster on IBM Cloud.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Background and Goal

Currently in OpenShift we do not support distributing hotfix packages to cluster nodes. In time-sensitive situations, a RHEL hotfix package can be the quickest route to resolving an issue. 

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Under guidance from Red Hat CEE, customers can deploy RHEL hotfix packages to MachineConfigPools.
  2. Customers can easily remove the hotfix when the underlying RHCOS image incorporates the fix.

Before we ship OCP CoreOS layering in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-165 we need to switch the format of what is currently `machine-os-content` to be the new base image.

The overall plan is:

  • Publish the new base image as `rhel-coreos-8` in the release image
  • Also publish the new extensions container (https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763) as `rhel-coreos-8-extensions`
  • Teach the MCO to use this without also involving layering/build controller
  • Delete old `machine-os-content`

After https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763 is in the release image, teach the MCO how to use it. This is basically:

  • Schedule the extensions container as a kubernetes service (just serves a yum repo via http)
  • Change the MCD to write a file into `/etc/yum.repos.d/machine-config-extensions.repo` that consumes it instead of what it does now in pulling RPMs from the mounted container filesystem

As a OCP CoreOS layering developer, having telemetry data about number of cluster using osImageURL will help understand how broadly this feature is getting used and improve accordingly.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Cluster using Custom osImageURL is available via telemetry

 

Why?

  • Decouple control and data plane. 
    • Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.
  • Improve security
    • Shift credentials out of cluster that support the operation of core platform vs workload
  • Improve cost
    • Allow a user to toggle what they don’t need.
    • Ensure a smooth path to scale to 0 workers and upgrade with 0 workers.

 

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

 

 

Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

Epic Goal

  • To improve debug-ability of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To verify the stability of of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To introduce a EgressIP reach-ability check that will work in hypershift

Why is this important?

  • ovn-k is supposed to be GA in 4.12. We need to make sure it is stable, we know the limitations and we are able to debug it similar to the self hosted cluster.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. This will need consultation with the people working on HyperShift

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SDN-2589

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

cluster-snapshot-controller-operator is running on the CP. 

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

As OpenShift developer I want cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator to use existing controllers in library-go, so I don’t need to maintain yet another code that does the same thing as library-go.

  • Check and remove manifests/03_configmap.yaml, it does not seem to be useful.
  • Check and remove manifests/03_service.yaml, it does not seem to be useful (at least now).
  • Use DeploymentController from library-go to sync Deployments.
  • Get rid of common/ package? It does not seem to be useful.
  • Use StaticResourceController for static content, including the snapshot CRDs.

Note: if this refactoring introduces any new conditions, we must make sure that 4.11 snapshot controller clears them to support downgrade! This will need 4.11 BZ + z-stream update!

Similarly, if some conditions become obsolete / not managed by any controller, they must be cleared by 4.12 operator.

Exit criteria:

  • The operator code is smaller.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.
  • Upgrade/downgrade from/to standalone OCP 4.11 works.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Move creation of manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml from CVO to the operator - it needs to be created in the management cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift by
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Don’t create operand’s PodDisruptionBudget?
    • Update ValidationWebhookConfiguration to point directly to URL exposed by manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml instead of a Service. The Service is not available in the guest cluster.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (both the webhook and csi-snapshot-controller).
    • Update unit tests to handle two kube clients.

Exit criteria:

  • cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • csi-snapshot-controller runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • It is possible to take & restore volume snapshot in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

Run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) + AWS EBS CSI driver operator + AWS EBS CSI driver control-plane Pods in the management cluster, run the driver DaemonSet in the hosted cluster.

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

 

As OCP support engineer I want the same guest cluster storage-related objects in output of "hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster" as in "oc adm must-gather ", so I can debug storage issues easily.

 

must-gather collects: storageclasses persistentvolumes volumeattachments csidrivers csinodes volumesnapshotclasses volumesnapshotcontents

hypershift collects none of this, the relevant code is here: https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/blob/bcfade6676f3c344b48144de9e7a36f9b40d3330/cmd/cluster/core/dump.go#L276

 

Exit criteria:

  • verify that hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster has storage objects from the guest cluster.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (AWS EBS CSI driver operator).

Exit criteria:

  • CSO and AWS EBS CSI driver operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run AWS EBS CSI driver operator + control plane of the CSI driver in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
  •  
  •  
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operand (control-plane Deployment of the CSI driver).

Exit criteria:

  • Control plane Deployment of AWS EBS CSI driver runs in the management cluster in HyperShift.
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

OC mirror is GA product as of Openshift 4.11 .

The goal of this feature is to solve any future customer request for new features or capabilities in OC mirror 

Epic Goal

  • Mirror to mirror operations and custom mirroring flows required by IBM CloudPak catalog management

Why is this important?

  • IBM needs additional customization around the actual mirroring of images to enable CloudPaks to fully adopt OLM-style operator packaging and catalog management
  • IBM CloudPaks introduce additional compute architectures, increasing the download volume by 2/3rds to day, we need the ability to effectively filter non-required image versions of OLM operator catalogs during filtering for other customers that only require a single or a subset of the available image architectures
  • IBM CloudPaks regularly run on older OCP versions like 4.8 which require additional work to be able to read the mirrored catalog produced by oc mirror

Scenarios

  1. Customers can use the oc utility and delegate the actual image mirror step to another tool
  2. Customers can mirror between disconnected registries using the oc utility
  3. The oc utility supports filtering manifest lists in the context of multi-arch images according to the sparse manifest list proposal in the distribution spec

Acceptance Criteria

  • Customers can use the oc utility to mirror between two different air-gapped environments
  • Customers can specify the desired computer architectures and oc mirror will create sparse manifest lists in the target registry as a result

Dependencies (internal and external)

Previous Work:

  1. WRKLDS-369
  2. Disconnected Mirroring Improvement Proposal

Related Work:

  1. https://github.com/opencontainers/distribution-spec/pull/310
  2. https://github.com/distribution/distribution/pull/3536
  3. https://docs.google.com/document/d/10ozLoV7sVPLB8msLx4LYamooQDSW-CAnLiNiJ9SER2k/edit?usp=sharing

Pre-Work Objectives

Since some of our requirements from the ACM team will not be available for the 4.12 timeframe, the team should work on anything we can get done in the scope of the console repo so that when the required items are available in 4.13, we can be more nimble in delivering GA content for the Unified Console Epic.

Overall GA Key Objective
Providing our customers with a single simplified User Experience(Hybrid Cloud Console)that is extensible, can run locally or in the cloud, and is capable of managing the fleet to deep diving into a single cluster. 
Why customers want this?

  1. Single interface to accomplish their tasks
  2. Consistent UX and patterns
  3. Easily accessible: One URL, one set of credentials

Why we want this?

  • Shared code -  improve the velocity of both teams and most importantly ensure consistency of the experience at the code level
  • Pre-built PF4 components
  • Accessibility & i18n
  • Remove barriers for enabling ACM

Phase 2 Goal: Productization of the united Console 

  1. Enable user to quickly change context from fleet view to single cluster view
    1. Add Cluster selector with “All Cluster” Option. “All Cluster” = ACM
    2. Shared SSO across the fleet
    3. Hub OCP Console can connect to remote clusters API
    4. When ACM Installed the user starts from the fleet overview aka “All Clusters”
  2. Share UX between views
    1. ACM Search —> resource list across fleet -> resource details that are consistent with single cluster details view
    2. Add Cluster List to OCP —> Create Cluster

As a developer I would like to disable clusters like *KS that we can't support for multi-cluster (for instance because we can't authenticate). The ManagedCluster resource has a vendor label that we can use to know if the cluster is supported.

cc Ali Mobrem Sho Weimer Jakub Hadvig 

UPDATE: 9/20/22 : we want an allow-list with OpenShift, ROSA, ARO, ROKS, and  OpenShiftDedicated

Acceptance criteria:

  • Investigate if console-operator should pass info about which cluster are supported and unsupported to the frontend
  • Unsupported clusters should not appear in the cluster dropdown
  • Unsupported clusters based off
    • defined vendor label
    • non 4.x ocp clusters

Feature Overview

RHEL CoreOS should be updated to RHEL 9.2 sources to take advantage of newer features, hardware support, and performance improvements.

 

Requirements

  • RHEL 9.x sources for RHCOS builds starting with OCP 4.13 and RHEL 9.2.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

(Optional) Use Cases

  • 9.2 Preview via Layering No longer necessary assuming we stay the course of going all in on 9.2

Assumptions

  • ...

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

PROBLEM

We would like to improve our signal for RHEL9 readiness by increasing internal engineering engagement and external partner engagement on our community OpehShift offering, OKD.

PROPOSAL

Adding OKD to run on SCOS (a CentOS stream for CoreOS) brings the community offering closer to what a partner or an internal engineering team might expect on OCP.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Image has been switched/included: 

DEPENDENCIES

The SCOS build payload.

RELATED RESOURCES

OKD+SCOS proposal: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_Xa9Z4tSqB7U2No7WA0KXb3lDIngNaQpS504ZLrCmg8/edit#slide=id.p

OKD+SCOS work draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cuWOXhATexNLWGKLjaOcVF4V95JJjP1E3UmQ2kDVzsA/edit

 

Acceptance Criteria

A stable OKD on SCOS is built and available to the community sprintly.

 

This comes up when installing ipi-on-aws on arm64 with the custom payload build at quay.io/aleskandrox/okd-release:4.12.0-0.okd-centos9-full-rebuild-arm64 that is using scos as machine-content-os image

 

```

[root@ip-10-0-135-176 core]# crictl logs c483c92e118d8
2022-08-11T12:19:39+00:00 [cnibincopy] FATAL ERROR: Unsupported OS ID=scos
```

 

The probable fix has to land on https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/blob/master/bindata/network/multus/multus.yaml#L41-L53

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Feature Overview (aka. Goal Summary)  

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

Some customer cases have revealed scenarios where the MCO state reporting is misleading and therefore could be unreliable to base decisions and automation on.

In addition to correcting some incorrect states, the MCO will be enhanced for a more granular view of update rollouts across machines.

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

For this epic, "state" means "what is the MCO doing?" – so the goal here is to try to make sure that it's always known what the MCO is doing. 

This includes: 

  • Conditions
  • Some Logging 
  • Possibly Some Events 

While this probably crosses a little bit into the "status" portion of certain MCO objects, as some state is definitely recorded there, this probably shouldn't turn into a "better status reporting" epic.  I'm interpreting "status" to mean "how is it going" so status is maybe a "detail attached to a state". 

 

Exploration here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j6Qea98aVP12kzmPbR_3Y-3-meJQBf0_K6HxZOkzbNk/edit?usp=sharing

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/17qYml7CETIaDmcEO-6OGQGNO0d7HtfyU7W4OMA6kTeM/edit?usp=sharing

 

The current property description is:

configuration represents the current MachineConfig object for the machine config pool.

But in a 4.12.0-ec.4 cluster, the actual semantics seem to be something closer to "the most recent rendered config that we completely leveled on". We should at least update the godocs to be more specific about the intended semantics. And perhaps consider adjusting the semantics?

Complete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were completed when this image was assembled

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

  •  

This story only covers API components. We will create a separate story for other utility functions.

Today we are generating documentation for Console's Dynamic Plugin SDK in
frontend/packages/dynamic-plugin-sdk. We are missing ts-doc for a set of hooks and components.

We are generating the markdown from the dynamic-plugin-sdk using

yarn generate-doc

Here is the list of the API that the dynamic-plugin-sdk is exposing:

https://gist.github.com/spadgett/0ddefd7ab575940334429200f4f7219a

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add missing jsdocs for the API that dynamic-plugin-sdk exposes

Out of Scope:

  • This does not include work for integrating the API docs into the OpenShift docs
  • This does not cover other public utilities, only components.

This epic contains all the OLM related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. `kuberneties.io/arch:arm64`, `kubernetes.io/arch:amd64` etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes. Each operator's PackageManifest contains a labels that indicates whats the operator's supported architecture, e.g.  `operatorframework.io/arch.s390x: supported`. An operator can be supported on multiple architectures

AC:

  1. Implement logic in the console's backend to read the set of architecture types from console-config.yaml and set it as a SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures (Change similar to https://github.com/openshift/console/commit/39aabe171a2e89ed3757ac2146d252d087fdfd33)
  2. In Operator hub render only operators that are support on any given node, based on the SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures field implemented in CONSOLE-3242.

 

OS and arch filtering: https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/2ad4e17d76acbe72171407fc1c66ca4596c8aac4/frontend/packages/operator-lifecycle-manager/src/components/operator-hub/operator-hub-items.tsx#L49-L86

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. kubernetes.io/arch=arm64, kubernetes.io/arch=amd64 etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes.

 

AC: 

  1. Implement logic in the console-operator that will scan though all the nodes and build a set of all the architecture types that the cluster nodes run on and pass it to the console-config.yaml
  2. Add unit and e2e test cases in the console-operator repository.

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

As a developer, I want to be able to clean up the css markup after making the css / scss changes required for dark mode and remove any old unused css / scss content. 

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Remove any unused scss / css content after revamping for dark mode

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Basic authentication for Helm Chart repository in helmchartrepositories.helm.openshift.io CRD.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
As of v4.6.9, the HelmChartRepository CRD only supports client TLS authentication through spec.connectionConfig.tlsClientConfig.

3. Why do you need this? (List the business requirements here)
Basic authentication is widely used by many chart repositories managers (Nexus OSS, Artifactory, etc.)
Helm CLI also supports them with the helm repo add command.
https://helm.sh/docs/helm/helm_repo_add/

4. How would you like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)
Probably by extending the CRD:

spec:
connectionConfig:
username: username
password:
secretName: secret-name

The secret namespace should be openshift-config to align with the tlsClientConfig behavior.

5. For each functional requirement listed in question 4, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.
Trying to pull helm charts from remote private chart repositories that has disabled anonymous access and offers basic authentication.
E.g.: https://github.com/sonatype/docker-nexus

Owner: Architect:

Story (Required)

As an OCP user I will like to be able to install helm charts from repos added to ODC with basic authentication fields populated

Background (Required)

We need to support helm installs for Repos that have the basic authentication secret name and namespace.

Glossary

Out of scope

Updating the ProjectHelmChartRepository CRD, already done in diff story
Supporting the HelmChartRepository CR, this feature will be scoped first to project/namespace scope repos.

In Scope

<Defines what is included in this story>

Approach(Required)

If the new fields for basic auth are set in the repo CR then use those credentials when making API calls to helm to install/upgrade charts. We will error out if user logged in does not have access to the secret referenced by Repo CR. If basic auth fields are not present we assume is not an authenticated repo.

Dependencies

Nonet

Edge Case

NA

Acceptance Criteria

I can list, install and update charts on authenticated repos from ODC
Needs Documentation both upstream and downstream
Needs new unit test covering repo auth

INVEST Checklist

Dependencies identified
Blockers noted and expected delivery timelines set
Design is implementable
Acceptance criteria agreed upon
Story estimated

Legend

Unknown
Verified
Unsatisfied

Epic Goal

  • Support manifest lists by image streams and the integrated registry. Clients should be able to pull/push manifests lists from/into the integrated registry. They also should be able to import images via `oc import-image` and them pull them from the internal registry.

Why is this important?

  • Manifest lists are becoming more and more popular. Customers want to mirror manifest lists into the registry and be able to pull them by digest.

Scenarios

  1. Manifest lists can be pushed into the integrated registry
  2. Imported manifests list can be pulled from the integrated registry
  3. Image triggers work with manifest lists

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Existing functionality shouldn't change its behavior

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional)

  1. https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/manifestlist/manifestlist-support.md

Open questions

  1. Can we merge creation of images without having the pruner?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

  • The ImageStream object should contain a new flag indicating that it refers to a manifest list
  • openshift-controller-manager uses new openshift/api code to import image streams
  • changing `importMode` of an image stream tag triggers a new import (i.e. updates generation in the tag spec)

NOTES

We plan to build Ironic Container Images using RHEL9 as base image in OCP 4.12

This is required because the ironic components have abandoned support for CentOS Stream 8 and Python 3.6/3.7 upstream during the most recent development cycle that will produce the stable Zed release, in favor of CentOS Stream 9 and Python 3.8/3.9

More info on RHEL8 to RHEL9 transition in OCP can be found at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N8KyDY7KmgUYA9EOtDDQolebz0qi3nhT20IOn4D-xS4

Epic Goal

  • We need the installer to accept a LB type from user and then we could set type of LB in the following object.
    oc get ingress.config.openshift.io/cluster -o yaml
    Then we can fetch info from this object and reconcile the operator to have the NLB changes reflected.

 

This is an API change and we will consider this as a feature request.

Why is this important?

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

 

Scenarios

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. installer
  2. ingress operator

Previous Work (Optional):

 No

Open questions::

N/A

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We need tests for the ovirt-csi-driver and the cluster-api-provider-ovirt. These tests help us to

  • minimize bugs,
  • reproduce and fix them faster and
  • pin down current behavior of the driver

Also, having dedicated tests on lower levels with a smaller scope (unit, integration, ...) has the following benefits:

  • fast feedback cycle (local test execution)
  • developer in-code documentation
  • easier onboarding for new contributers
  • lower resource consumption
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Description

As a user, In the topology view, I would like to be updated intuitively if any of the deployments have reached quota limits

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show a yellow border around deployments if any of the deployments have reached the quota limit
  2. For deployments, if there are any errors associated with resource limits or quotas, include a warning alert in the side panel.
    1. If we know resource limits are the cause, include link to Edit resource limits
    2. If we know pod count is the cause, include a link to Edit pod count

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Description

As a user, I would like to be informed in an intuitive way,  when quotas have been reached in a namespace

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show an alert banner on the Topology and add page for this project/namespace when there is a RQ (Resource Quota) / ACRQ (Applied Cluster Resource Quota) issue
    PF guideline: https://www.patternfly.org/v4/components/alert/design-guidelines#using-alerts 
  2. The above alert should have a CTA link to the search page with all RQ, ACRQ and if there is just one show the details page for the same
  3. For RQ, ACRQ list view show one more column called status with details as shown in the project view.

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Goal

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins to manage the perspectives to meet the ACs below.

Problem:

We have heard the following requests from customers and developer advocates:

  • Some admins do not want to provide access to the Developer Perspective from the console
  • Some admins do not want to provide non-priv users access to the Admin Perspective from the console

Acceptance criteria:

  1. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the admin perspective for non-priv users
  2. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the developer perspective for all users
  3. Be user that User Preferences for individual users behaves appropriately. If only one perspective is available, the perspective switcher is not needed.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As an admin, I want to be able to use a form driven experience  to hide user perspective(s)

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Add checkboxes with the options
    1. Hide "Administrator" perspective for non-privileged users
    2.  Hide "Developer" perspective for all users
  2. The console configuration CR should be updated as per the selected option

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to add user perspectives

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add user perspectives

To support the cluster-admin to configure the perspectives correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization of yaml resource (Console CRD).

Customize Perspective Enhancement PR: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1205

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML which supports the admin to add user perspectives

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Description

As an admin, I want to hide the admin perspective for non-privileged users or hide the developer perspective for all users

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6730 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Description

As an admin, I want to hide user perspective(s) based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide perspective(s) based on the customization
    1. When the admin perspective is disabled -> we hide the admin perspective for all unprivileged users
    2. When the dev perspective is disabled -> we hide the dev perspective for all users
  2. When all the perspectives are hidden from a user or for all users, show the Admin perspective by default

Additional Details:

Problem:

Customers don't want their users to have access to some/all of the items which are available in the Developer Catalog.  The request is to change access for the cluster, not per user or persona.

Goal:

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins easily disable the Developer Catalog, or one or more of the sub catalogs in the Developer Catalog.

Why is it important?

Multiple customer requests.

Acceptance criteria:

  1. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
  2. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to a specific sub-catalog in the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
    1. Builder Images
    2. Templates
    3. Helm Charts
    4. Devfiles
    5. Operator Backed

Notes

We need to consider how this will work with subcatalogs which are installed by operators: VMs, Event Sources, Event Catalogs, Managed Services, Cloud based services

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide/disable access to specific sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or the complete dev catalog for all users across all namespaces.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Description

As a cluster-admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to enable sub-catalogs or the entire dev catalog.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add sub-catalog(s)  from the Developer Catalog or the Dev catalog as a whole.

To support the cluster-admin to configure the sub-catalog list correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization yaml resource (Console CRD).

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML, which supports the admin to add sub-catalogs/the whole dev catalog

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Description

As an admin, I want to hide sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or hide the developer catalog completely based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide all links to the sub-catalog(s) from the add page, topology actions, empty states, quick search, and the catalog itself
  2. The sub-catalog should show Not found if the user opens the sub-catalog directly
  3. The feature should not be hidden if a sub-catalog option is disabled

Additional Details:

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Come up with a consistent way to detect node down on OCP and hypershift. Current mechanism for OCP (probe port 9) does not work for hypershift, meaning, hypershift node down detection will be longer (~40 secs). We should aim to have a common mechanism for both. As well, we should consider alternatives to the probing port 9. Perhaps BFD, or other detection.
  • Get clarification on node down detection times. Some customers have (apparently) asked for detection on the order of 100ms, recommendation is to use multiple Egress IPs, so this may not be a hard requirement. Need clarification from PM/Customers.

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Add sock proxy to cluster-network-operator so egressip can use grpc to reach worker nodes.
 
With the introduction of grpc as means for determining the state of a given egress node, hypershift should
be able to leverage socks proxy and become able to know the state of each egress node.
 
References relevant to this work:
1281-network-proxy
[+https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C01C8502FMM/p1658427627751939+]
[+https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1131/commits/28546dc587dc028dc8bded715847346ff99d65ea+]

This Epic is here to track the rebase we need to do when kube 1.25 is GA https://www.kubernetes.dev/resources/release/

Keeping this in mind can help us plan our time better. ATTOW GA is planned for August 23

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h1XsEt1Iug-W9JRheQas7YRsUJ_NQ8ghEMVmOZ4X-0s/edit --> this is the link for rebase help

Incomplete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were not completed when this image was assembled

Epic Goal

  • Update OpenShift components that are owned by the Builds + Jenkins Team to use Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Our components need to be updated to ensure that they are using the latest bug/CVE fixes, features, and that they are API compatible with other OpenShift components.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Existing CI/CD tests must be passing

This is epic tracks "business as usual" requirements / enhancements / bug fixing of Insights Operator.

Today the links point at a rule-scoped page, but that page lacks information about recommended resolution.  You can click through by cluster ID to your specific cluster and get that recommendation advice, but it would be more convenient and less confusing for customers if we linked directly to the cluster-scoped recommendation page.

We can implement by updating the template here to be:

fmt.Sprintf("https://console.redhat.com/openshift/insights/advisor/clusters/%s?first=%s%%7C%s", clusterID, ruleIDStr, rec.ErrorKey)

or something like that.

 

unknowns

request is clear, solution/implementation to be further clarified

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

Based on API review CONSOLE-3145, we have decided to deprecate the following APIs:

  • useAccessReviewAllowed (use useAccessReview instead)
  • useSafetyFirst

cc Andrew Ballantyne Bryan Florkiewicz 

Currently our `api.md` does not generate docs with "tags" (aka `@deprecated`) – we'll need to add that functionality to the `generate-doc.ts` script. See the code that works for `console-extensions.md`

Following https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C011BL0FEKZ/p1650640804532309, it would be useful for us (network observability team) to have access to ResourceIcon in dynamic-plugin-sdk.

Currently ResourceLink is exported but not ResourceIcon

 

AC:

  • Require the ResourceIcon  from public to dynamic-plugin-sdk
  • Add the component to the dynamic-demo-plugin
  • Add a CI test to check for the ResourceIcon component

 

We neither use nor support static plugin nav extensions anymore so we should remove the API in the static plugin SDK and get rid of related cruft in our current nav components.

 

AC: Remove static plugin nav extensions code. Check the navigation code for any references to the old API.

We should have a global notification or the `Console plugins` page (e.g., k8s/cluster/operator.openshift.io~v1~Console/cluster/console-plugins) should alert users when console operator `spec.managementState` is `Unmanaged` as changes to `enabled` for plugins will have no effect.

The extension `console.dashboards/overview/detail/item` doesn't constrain the content to fit the card.

The details-card has an expectation that a <dd> item will be the last item (for spacing between items). Our static details-card items use a component called 'OverviewDetailItem'. This isn't enforced in the extension and can cause undesired padding issues if they just do whatever they want.

I feel our approach here should be making the extension take the props of 'OverviewDetailItem' where 'children' is the new 'component'.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Deprecate the old extension (in docs, with date/stamp)
  • Make a new extension that applies a stricter type
  • Include this new extension next to the old one (with the error boundary around it)

During the development of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CONSOLE-3062, it was determined additional information is needed in order to assist a user when troubleshooting a Failed plugin (see https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11664#issuecomment-1159024959). As it stands today, there is no data available to the console to relay to the user regarding why the plugin Failed. Presumably, a message should be added to NotLoadedDynamicPlugin to address this gap.

 

AC: Add `message` property to NotLoadedDynamicPluginInfo type.

Move `frontend/public/components/nav` to `packages/console-app/src/components/nav` and address any issues resulting from the move.

There will be some expected lint errors relating to cyclical imports. These will require some refactoring to address.

when defining two proxy endpoints, 
apiVersion: console.openshift.io/v1alpha1
kind: ConsolePlugin
metadata:
...
name: forklift-console-plugin
spec:
displayName: Console Plugin Template
proxy:

  • alias: forklift-inventory
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-inventory
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service
  • alias: forklift-must-gather-api
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-must-gather-api
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service

service:
basePath: /
I get two proxy endpoints
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
and
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-must-gather-api

but both proxy to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service

e.g.
curl to:
[server url]/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
will point to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service, instead of the `forklift-inventory` service

To align with https://github.com/openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk, plugin metadata field dependencies as well as the @console/pluginAPI entry contained within should be made optional.

If a plugin doesn't declare the @console/pluginAPI dependency, the Console release version check should be skipped for that plugin.

The console has good error boundary components that are useful for dynamic plugin.
Exposing them will enable the plugins to get the same look and feel of handling react errors as console
The minimum requirement right now is to expose the ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage component from
https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/master/frontend/packages/console-shared/src/components/error/fallbacks/ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage.tsx

`@openshift-console/plugin-shared` (NPM) is a package that will contain shared components that can be upversioned separately by the Plugins so they can keep core compatibility low but upversion and support more shared components as we need them.

This isn't documented today. We need to do that.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Add a note in the "SDK packages" section of the README about the existence of this package and it's purpose
    • The purpose of being a static utility delivery library intended not to be tied to OpenShift Console versions and compatible with multiple version of OpenShift Console

Currently the ConsolePlugins API version is v1alpha1. Since we are going GA with dynamic plugins we should be creating a v1 version.

This would require updates in following repositories:

  1. openshift/api (add the v1 version and generate a new CRD)
  2. openshift/client-go (picku the changes in the openshift/api repo and generate clients & informers for the new v1 version)
  3. openshift/console-operator repository will using both the new v1 version and v1alpha1 in code and manifests folder.

AC:

  • both v1 and v1alpha1 ConsolePlugins should be passed to the console-config.yaml when the plugins are enabled and present on the cluster.

 

NOTE: This story does not include the conversion webhook change which will be created as a follow on story

Epic Goal

  • Enable OpenShift IPI Installer to deploy OCP to a shared VPC in GCP.
  • The host project is where the VPC and subnets are defined. Those networks are shared to one or more service projects.
  • Objects created by the installer are created in the service project where possible. Firewall rules may be the only exception.
  • Documentation outlines the needed minimal IAM for both the host and service project.

Why is this important?

  • Shared VPC's are a feature of GCP to enable granular separation of duties for organizations that centrally manage networking but delegate other functions and separation of billing. This is used more often in larger organizations where separate teams manage subsets of the cloud infrastructure. Enterprises that use this model would also like to create IPI clusters so that they can leverage the features of IPI. Currently organizations that use Shared VPC's must use UPI and implement the features of IPI themselves. This is repetative engineering of little value to the customer and an increased risk of drift from upstream IPI over time. As new features are built into IPI, organizations must become aware of those changes and implement them themselves instead of getting them "for free" during upgrades.

Scenarios

  1. Deploy cluster(s) into service project(s) on network(s) shared from a host project.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a user, I want to be able to:

  • skip creating service accounts in Terraform when using passthrough credentialsMode.
  • pass the installer service account to Terraform to be used as the service account for instances when using passthrough credentialsMode.

so that I can achieve

  • creating an IPI cluster using Shared VPC networks using a pre-created service account with the necessary permissions in the Host Project.

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation
  • Point 1
  • Point 2
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

Detail about what is specifically not being delivered in the story

Engineering Details:

This is a follow up Epic to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-144, which aimed to get in-place upgrades for Hypershift. This epic aims to capture additional work to focus on using CoreOS/OCP layering into Hypershift, which has benefits such as:

 

 - removing or reducing the need for ignition

 - maintaining feature parity between self-driving and managed OCP models

 - adding additional functionality such as hotfixes

Currently not implemented, and will require the MCD hypershift mode to be adjusted to handle disruptionless upgrades like regular MCD

Right now in https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1258 you can only perform one upgrade at a time. Multiple upgrades will break due to controller logic

 

Properly create logic to handle manifest creation/updates and deletion, so the logic is more bulletproof

Changes made in METAL-1 open up opportunities to improve our handling of images by cleaning up redundant code that generates extra work for the user and extra load for the cluster.

We only need to run the image cache DaemonSet if there is a QCOW URL to be mirrored (effectively this means a cluster installed with 4.9 or earlier). We can stop deploying it for new clusters installed with 4.10 or later.

Currently, the image-customization-controller relies on the image cache running on every master to provide the shared hostpath volume containing the ISO and initramfs. The first step is to replace this with a regular volume and an init container in the i-c-c pod that extracts the images from machine-os-images. We can use the copy-metal -image-build flag (instead of -all used in the shared volume) to provide only the required images.

Once i-c-c has its own volume, we can switch the image extraction in the metal3 Pod's init container to use the -pxe flag instead of -all.

The machine-os-images init container for the image cache (not the metal3 Pod) can be removed. The whole image cache deployment is now optional and need only be started if provisioningOSDownloadURL is set (and in fact should be deleted if it is not).

Epic Goal

  • To improve the reliability of disk cleaning before installation and to provide the user with sufficient warning regarding the consequences of the cleaning

Why is this important?

  • Insufficient cleaning can lead to installation failure
  • Insufficient warning can lead to complaints of unexpected data loss

Scenarios

  1.  

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Description of the problem:
When running assisted-installer on a machine where is more than one volume group per physical volume. Only the first volume group will be cleaned up. This leads to problems later and will lead to errors such as

Failed - failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- pvremove /dev/sda -y -ff], Error exit status 5, LastOutput "Can't open /dev/sda exclusively. Mounted filesystem? 

How reproducible:

Set up a VM with more than one volume group per physical volume. As an example, look at the following sample from a customer cluster.

List block devices
/usr/bin/lsblk -o NAME,MAJ:MIN,SIZE,TYPE,FSTYPE,KNAME,MODEL,UUID,WWN,HCTL,VENDOR,STATE,TRAN,PKNAME
NAME              MAJ:MIN   SIZE TYPE FSTYPE      KNAME MODEL            UUID                                   WWN                HCTL       VENDOR   STATE   TRAN PKNAME
loop0               7:0   125.9G loop xfs         loop0                  c080b47b-2291-495c-8cc0-2009ebc39839                                                       
loop1               7:1   885.5M loop squashfs    loop1                                                                                                             
sda                 8:0   894.3G disk             sda   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b2db 1:0:0:0    ATA      running sas  
|-sda1              8:1     250M part             sda1                                                          0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda2              8:2     750M part ext2        sda2                   3aa73c72-e342-4a07-908c-a8a49767469d   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda3              8:3      49G part xfs         sda3                   ffc3ccfe-f150-4361-8ae5-f87b17c13ac2   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda4              8:4   394.2G part LVM2_member sda4                   Ua3HOc-Olm4-1rma-q0Ug-PtzI-ZOWg-RJ63uY 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
`-sda5              8:5     450G part LVM2_member sda5                   W8JqrD-ZvaC-uNK9-Y03D-uarc-Tl4O-wkDdhS 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sda5
sdb                 8:16  894.3G disk             sdb   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b31b 1:0:1:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdb1              8:17  894.3G part LVM2_member sdb1                   6ETObl-EzTd-jLGw-zVNc-lJ5O-QxgH-5wLAqD 0x55cd2e415235b31b                                  sdb
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdb1
sdc                 8:32  894.3G disk             sdc   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b652 1:0:2:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdc1              8:33  894.3G part LVM2_member sdc1                   pBuktx-XlCg-6Mxs-lddC-qogB-ahXa-Nd9y2p 0x55cd2e415235b652                                  sdc
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdc1
sdd                 8:48  894.3G disk             sdd   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e41521679b7 1:0:3:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdd1              8:49  894.3G part LVM2_member sdd1                   exVSwU-Pe07-XJ6r-Sfxe-CQcK-tu28-Hxdnqo 0x55cd2e41521679b7                                  sdd
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdd1
sr0                11:0     989M rom  iso9660     sr0   Virtual CDROM0   2022-06-17-18-18-33-00                                    0:0:0:0    AMI      running usb  

Now run the assisted installer and try to install an SNO node on this machine, you will find that the installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Actual results:

 The installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Expected results:

The installation should proceed and the cluster should start to install.

Suspected Cases
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3809
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3802
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3810

Description of the problem:

Cluster Installation fail if installation disk has lvm on raid:

Host: test-infra-cluster-3cc862c9-master-0, reached installation stage Failed: failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- mdadm --stop /dev/md0], Error exit status 1, LastOutput "mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md0:Perhaps a running process, mounted filesystem or active volume group?" 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install a cluster while master nodes has disk with LVM on RAID (reproduces using test: https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/ocp-edge-qe/kni-assisted-installer-auto/-/blob/master/api_tests/test_disk_cleanup.py#L97)

Actual results:

Installation failed

Expected results:

Installation success

Epic Goal

  • Increase success-rate of of our CI jobs
  • Improve debugability / visibility or tests 

Why is this important?

  • Failed presubmit jobs (required or optional) can make an already tested+approved PR to not get in
  • Failed periodic jobs interfere our visibility around stability of features

Description of problem:

check_pkt_length cannot be offloaded without
1) sFlow offload patches in Openvswitch
2) Hardware driver support.

Since 1) will not be done anytime soon. We need a work around for the check_pkt_length issue.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11/4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Any flow that has check_pkt_len()
  5-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  6-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  4-b: Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  10-b: Host Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  11-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  12-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)   

Actual results:

Poor performance due to upcalls when check_pkt_len() is not supported.

Expected results:

Good performance.

Additional info:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LHY-Af-2kQHVwtW4aVdHnmwZLTiatiyf-ySffC8O5NM/edit#gid=670206692

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Run OpenShift builds that do not execute as the "root" user on the host node.

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift builds require an elevated set of capabilities to build a container image
  • Builds currently run as root to maintain adequate performance
  • Container workloads should run as non-root from the host's perspective. Containers running as root are a known security risk.
  • Builds currently run as root and require a privileged container. See BUILD-225 for removing the privileged container requirement.

Scenarios

  1. Run BuildConfigs in a multi-tenant environment
  2. Run BuildConfigs in a heightened security environment/deployment

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can opt into running builds in a cri-o user namespace by providing an environment variable with a specific value.
  • When the correct environment variable is provided, builds run in a cri-o user namespace, and the build pod does not require the "privileged: true" security context.
  • User namespace builds can pass basic test scenarios for the Docker and Source strategy build.
  • Steps to run unprivileged builds are documented.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Buildah supports running inside a non-privileged container
  2. CRI-O allows workloads to opt into running containers in user namespaces.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. BUILD-225 - remove privileged requirement for builds.

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a developer building container images on OpenShift
I want to specify that my build should run without elevated privileges
So that builds do not run as root from the host's perspective with elevated privileges

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can provide an environment variable to indicate the build should not use privileged containers
  • When the correct env var + value is specified, builds run in a user namespace (non-root on the host)

QE Impact

No QE required for Dev Preview. OpenShift regression testing will verify that existing behavior is not impacted.

Docs Impact

We will need to document how to enable this feature, with sufficient warnings regarding Dev Preview.

PX Impact

This likely warrants an OpenShift blog post, potentially?

Notes

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • ...

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We have been running into a number of problems with configure-ovs and nodeip-configuration selecting different interfaces in OVNK deployments. This causes connectivity issues, so we need some way to ensure that everything uses the same interface/IP.

Currently configure-ovs runs before nodeip-configuration, but since nodeip-configuration is the source of truth for IP selection regardless of CNI plugin, I think we need to look at swapping that order. That way configure-ovs could look at what nodeip-configuration chose and not have to implement its own interface selection logic.

I'm targeting this at 4.12 because even though there's probably still time to get it in for 4.11, changing the order of boot services is always a little risky and I'd prefer to do it earlier in the cycle so we have time to tease out any issues that arise. We may need to consider backporting the change though since this has been an issue at least back to 4.10.

Epic Goal

  • Facilitate the transition to for OLM and content to PSA enforcing the `restricted` security profile
  • Use the label synch'er to enforce the required security profile
  • Current content should work out-of-the-box as is
  • Upgrades should not be blocked

Why is this important?

  • PSA helps secure the cluster by enforcing certain security restrictions that the pod must meet to be scheduled
  • 4.12 will enforce the `restricted` profile, which will affect the deployment of operators in `openshift-*` namespaces 

Scenarios

  1. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*`namespace that is not managed by the label syncher -> label should be applied
  2. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*` namespace that has a label asking the label syncher to not reconcile it -> nothing changes

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Done only downstream
  • Transition documentation written and reviewed

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. label syncher (still searching for the link)

Open questions::

  1. Is this only for openshift-* namespaces?

Resources

Stakeholders

  • Daniel S...?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an admin, I would like openshift-* namespaces with an operator to be labeled with security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true to ensure the continual functioning of operators without manual intervention. The label should only be applied to openshift-* namespaces with an operator (the presence of a ClusterServiceVersion resource) IF the label is not already present. This automation will help smooth functioning of the cluster and avoid frivolous operational events.

Context: As part of the PSA migration period, Openshift will ship with the "label sync'er" - a controller that will automatically adjust PSA security profiles in response to the workloads present in the namespace. We can assume that not all operators (produced by Red Hat, the community or ISVs) will have successfully migrated their deployments in response to upstream PSA changes. The label sync'er will sync, by default, any namespace not prefixed with "openshift-", of which an explicit label (security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true) is required for sync.

A/C:
 - OLM operator has been modified (downstream only) to label any unlabelled "openshift-" namespace in which a CSV has been created
 - If a labeled namespace containing at least one non-copied csv becomes unlabelled, it should be relabelled 
 - The implementation should be done in a way to eliminate or minimize subsequent downstream sync work (it is ok to make slight architectural changes to the OLM operator in the upstream to enable this)

Goal
Provide an indication that advanced features are used

Problem

Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features.

Why is this important?

  1. Better focus upsell efforts
  2. Compliance information for customers that are not aware they are not using the right subscription

 

Prioritized Scenarios

In Scope
1. Add a boolean variable in our telemetry to mark if the customer is using advanced features (PV encryption, encryption with KMS, external mode). 

Not in Scope

Integrate with subscription watch - will be done by the subscription watch team with our help.

Customers

All

Customer Facing Story
As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions

What does success look like?

A clear indication in subscription watch for ODF usage (either essential or advanced). 

1. Proposed title of this feature request

  • Request to add a bool variable into telemetry which indicates the usage of any of the advanced feature, like PV encryption or KMS encryption or external mode etc.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?

  • Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features. This feature will help RH to have a better indication on the statistics of customers using the advanced features and focus better on upsell efforts.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

  • As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions.

4. List any affected packages or components.

  • Telemetry

_____________________

Link to main epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHSTOR-3173

 

This epic tracks network tooling improvements for 4.12

New framework and process should be developed to make sharing network tools with devs, support and customers convenient. We are going to add some tools for ovn troubleshooting before ovn-k goes default, also some tools that we got from customer cases, and some more to help analyze and debug collected logs based on stable must-gather/sosreport format we get now thanks to 4.11 Epic.

Our estimation for this Epic is 1 engineer * 2 Sprints

WHY:
This epic is important to help improve the time it takes our customers and our team to understand an issue within the cluster.
A focus of this epic is to develop tools to quickly allow debugging of a problematic cluster. This is crucial for the engineering team to help us scale. We want to provide a tool to our customers to help lower the cognitive burden to get at a root cause of an issue.

 

Alert if any of the ovn controllers disconnected for a period of time from the southbound database using metric ovn_controller_southbound_database_connected.

The metric updates every 2 minutes so please be mindful of this when creating the alert.

If the controller is disconnected for 10 minutes, fire an alert.

DoD: Merged to CNO and tested by QE

Other Complete

This section includes Jira cards that are not linked to either an Epic or a Feature. These tickets were completed when this image was assembled

There is a bug where creating OLM subscription manifests early in the installation process results in those OLM operators not being installed.

This is because the OLM installation Jobs fail when they are tried early in the installation process, and OLM does not retry those jobs sufficiently and eventually gives up on them.

This should be solved starting OCP 4.12, but until then, we should solve this using Assisted.

A way to solve this is to delay the installation of OLM operators to only occur after the cluster is up and healthy. 

This can be done by creating the subscriptions with "installPlanApproval" set to "Manual" instead of "Automatic". Then once the cluster is up and healthy, the assisted-controller should approve the InstallPlans that OLM will create for the operators. This will then trigger the installation which is more likely to succeed since the cluster is up and healthy at this point

We need to rebase openshift-sdn to kube 1.25's kube-proxy.

In particular, we need this to get https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/110334 into master because we will probably get asked to backport it.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4089. The following is the description of the original issue:

The kube-state-metric pod inside the openshift-monitoring namespace is not running as expected.

On checking the logs I am able to see that there is a memory panic

~~~
2022-11-22T09:57:17.901790234Z I1122 09:57:17.901768 1 main.go:199] Starting kube-state-metrics self metrics server: 127.0.0.1:8082
2022-11-22T09:57:17.901975837Z I1122 09:57:17.901951 1 main.go:66] levelinfomsgTLS is disabled.http2false
2022-11-22T09:57:17.902389844Z I1122 09:57:17.902291 1 main.go:210] Starting metrics server: 127.0.0.1:8081
2022-11-22T09:57:17.903191857Z I1122 09:57:17.903133 1 main.go:66] levelinfomsgTLS is disabled.http2false
2022-11-22T09:57:17.906272505Z I1122 09:57:17.906224 1 builder.go:191] Active resources: certificatesigningrequests,configmaps,cronjobs,daemonsets,deployments,endpoints,horizontalpodautoscalers,ingresses,jobs,leases,limitranges,mutatingwebhookconfigurations,namespaces,networkpolicies,nodes,persistentvolumeclaims,persistentvolumes,poddisruptionbudgets,pods,replicasets,replicationcontrollers,resourcequotas,secrets,services,statefulsets,storageclasses,validatingwebhookconfigurations,volumeattachments
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z E1122 09:57:17.917560 1 runtime.go:78] Observed a panic: "invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" (runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z goroutine 24 [running]:
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.logPanic(

{0x1635600, 0x2696e10})
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /go/src/k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:74 +0x7d
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.HandleCrash({0x0, 0x0, 0xfffffffe})
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /go/src/k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:48 +0x75
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z panic({0x1635600, 0x2696e10}

)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:1038 +0x215
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/v2/internal/store.ingressMetricFamilies.func6(0x40)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /go/src/k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/internal/store/ingress.go:136 +0x189
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/v2/internal/store.wrapIngressFunc.func1(

{0x17fe520, 0xc00063b590})
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /go/src/k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/internal/store/ingress.go:175 +0x49
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/v2/pkg/metric_generator.(*FamilyGenerator).Generate(...)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /go/src/k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/pkg/metric_generator/generator.go:67
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/v2/pkg/metric_generator.ComposeMetricGenFuncs.func1({0x17fe520, 0xc00063b590}

)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /go/src/k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/pkg/metric_generator/generator.go:107 +0xd8
~~~

Logs are attached to the support case

Description of problem:

Each LB created for a Service type LoadBalancer results in 1 client rule and <# of public subnets> health rules being created.  The rules per SG quota in AWS is quite small; 60 by default, and 200 hard max.  OCP has about 40 rules OOTB. Assuming an HA cluster in 3 AZs, that is 4 rules per LB.  With default AWS quota, only ~5 LBs can be create and with the hard max of 200, only ~40 LBs can be created.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.  Create Service type LoadBalancer and observe increase in master-sg and worker-sg rules sets
2.
3.

Actual results:

4 rules are created

Expected results:

1 rules is created when the client rule is a superset of the per-subnet health rules

Additional info:

This ~4x the number of Services of type LoadBalancer.  This is required for Hypershift.

Description of problem:

QE has one vsphere6.7 u3 env, privilege "InventoryService.Tagging.ObjectAttachable" does not exist, and installer fails as below.

FATAL failed to fetch Terraform Variables: failed to fetch dependency of "Terraform Variables": failed to generate asset "Platform Provisioning Check": platform.vsphere.defaultDatastore: Internal error: privileges missing for vSphere vCenter Datastore: InventoryService.Tagging.ObjectAttachable

As vSphere 6.7 U3 is deprecated but not removed, so it should be supported, users may hit the similar issue on 6.7u3 when fresh installing.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-30-142847

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create role for each vsphere objects and assign listed privileges on it based on instlallation doc, then add permission to each object with created and user 
2. Install IPI cluster on vSphere platform by this user
3. Installer fails and complains that missing privilege "InventoryService.Tagging.ObjectAttachable"

Actual results:

Installer fails and complains that missing privilege "InventoryService.Tagging.ObjectAttachable"

Expected results:

Installer should succeed.

Additional info:

 

We do not have a well defined method to find these all just yet, identifying that would be a good first step.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4207. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:


We added a line to increase debugging verbosity to aid in debugging WRKLDS-540

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

13

How reproducible:

very

Steps to Reproduce:

1.just a revert
2.
3.

Actual results:

Extra debugging lines are present in the openshift-config-operator pod logs

Expected results:

Extra debugging lines no longer in the openshift-config-operator pod logs

Additional info:


Description of problem:

The name of "Role" on Compute -> Nodes page should update to "Roles" to match the name in the CLI

Compare with other resources, the title of the column should keep pace with the name in CLI

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-15-150248

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Login OCP with CLI, use below command to get nodes information

     $ oc get nodes
2. Go to Compute -> nodes page, check the column name of "Role"
3.

Actual results:

CLI will return information as below shown, and the title of the column is "ROLES"

NAME                                         STATUS   ROLES    AGE   VERSION
ip-10-0-145-18.us-east-2.compute.internal    Ready    worker   9h    v1.24.0+4f0dd4d
ip-10-0-145-203.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    master   9h    v1.24.0+4f0dd4d
ip-10-0-163-205.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    master   9h    v1.24.0+4f0dd4d
ip-10-0-169-118.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    worker   9h    v1.24.0+4f0dd4d
ip-10-0-198-234.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    master   9h    v1.24.0+4f0dd4d
ip-10-0-212-34.us-east-2.compute.internal    Ready    worker   9h    v1.24.0+4f0dd4d

But in UI, the name of ROLES is "Role" which is incorrect. (Attached)

Expected results:

The title of "Role" should update to "Roles"

Additional info:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3018. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When running an overnight run in dev-scripts (COMPACT_IPV4) with repeated installs I saw this panic in WaitForBootstrapComplete occur once.

level=debug msg=Agent Rest API Initialized
E1101 05:19:09.733309 1802865 runtime.go:79] Observed a panic: "invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" (runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference)
goroutine 1 [running]:
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.logPanic({0x4086520?, 0x1d875810})
    /home/stack/go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:75 +0x99
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.HandleCrash({0x0, 0x0, 0xc00056fb00?})
    /home/stack/go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:49 +0x75
panic({0x4086520, 0x1d875810})
    /usr/local/go/src/runtime/panic.go:838 +0x207
github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/agent.(*NodeZeroRestClient).getClusterID(0xc0001341e0)
    /home/stack/go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/agent/rest.go:121 +0x53
github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/agent.(*Cluster).IsBootstrapComplete(0xc000134190)
    /home/stack/go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/agent/cluster.go:183 +0x4fc
github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/agent.WaitForBootstrapComplete.func1()
    /home/stack/go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/agent/waitfor.go:31 +0x77
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.BackoffUntil.func1(0x1d8fa901?)
    /home/stack/go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:157 +0x3e
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.BackoffUntil(0xc0001958c0?, {0x1a53c7a0, 0xc0011d4a50}, 0x1, 0xc0001958c0)
    /home/stack/go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:158 +0xb6
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.JitterUntil(0xc0009ab860?, 0x77359400, 0x0, 0xa?, 0x8?)
    /home/stack/go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:135 +0x89
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.Until(...)
    /home/stack/go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:92
github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/agent.WaitForBootstrapComplete({0x7ffd7fccb4e3?, 0x40d7e7?})
    /home/stack/go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/agent/waitfor.go:30 +0x1bc
github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/agent.WaitForInstallComplete({0x7ffd7fccb4e3?, 0x5?})
    /home/stack/go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/agent/waitfor.go:73 +0x56
github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install/agent.newWaitForInstallCompleteCmd.func1(0xc0003b6c80?, {0xc0004d67c0?, 0x2?, 0x2?})
    /home/stack/go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install/agent/waitfor.go:73 +0x126
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute(0xc0003b6c80, {0xc0004d6780, 0x2, 0x2})
    /home/stack/go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:876 +0x67b
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC(0xc0013b0a00)
    /home/stack/go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:990 +0x3b4
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute(...)
    /home/stack/go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:918
main.installerMain()
    /home/stack/go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install/main.go:61 +0x2b0
main.main()
    /home/stack/go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install/main.go:38 +0xff
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference [recovered]
    panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x8 pc=0x33d3cd3]

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-25-210451

How reproducible:

Occurred on the 12th run, all previous installs were successfule

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Set up dev-scripts for  AGENT_E2E_TEST_SCENARIO=COMPACT_IPV4, no mirroring
2. Run 'make clean; make agent' in a loop
3. After repeated installs got the failure

Actual results:

Panic in WaitForBootstrapComplete

Expected results:

No failure

Additional info:

It looks like clusterResult is used here even on failure, which causes the dereference - https://github.com/openshift/installer/blob/master/pkg/agent/rest.go#L121

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3990. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

This PR fails HyperShift CI fails with:

=== RUN TestAutoscaling/EnsureNoPodsWithTooHighPriority
util.go:411: pod csi-snapshot-controller-7bb4b877b4-q5457 with priorityClassName system-cluster-critical has a priority of 2000000000 with exceeds the max allowed of 100002000
util.go:411: pod csi-snapshot-webhook-644b6dbfb-v4lj7 with priorityClassName system-cluster-critical has a priority of 2000000000 with exceeds the max allowed of 100002000

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Install HyperShift + create a guest cluster with CSI Snapshot Controller and/or Cluster Storage Operator / AWS EBS CSI driver operator running in the HyperShift managed cluster
  2. Check priorityClass of the guest control plane pods in the hosted cluster.

Alternatively, ci/prow/e2e-aws in https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1698 and https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1748 must pass.

These two tests are permafailing on webhook errors related to the CRD:

[sig-installer][Feature:baremetal][Serial] A baremetal deployment without a provisioning network should show the Provisioning Network as 'Disabled' [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]

[sig-installer][Feature:baremetal][Serial] A baremetal deployment without a provisioning network should [apigroup:config.openshift.io] show the Provisioning Network as 'Disabled' [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]

[sig-installer][Feature:baremetal][Serial] A baremetal deployment without a provisioning network should allow setting the ProvisioningNetwork to 'Managed' with valid settings [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]

[sig-installer][Feature:baremetal][Serial] A baremetal deployment without a provisioning network should [apigroup:config.openshift.io] allow setting the ProvisioningNetwork to 'Managed' with valid settings [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]

job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-serial-virtualmedia=all

Example run:
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-serial-virtualmedia/1567416810377056256

Sippy links:

https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.12/analysis?test=%5Bsig-installer%5D%5BFeature%3Abaremetal%5D%5BSerial%5D%20A%20baremetal%20deployment%20without%20a%20provisioning%20network%20should%20allow%20setting%20the%20ProvisioningNetwork%20to%20%27Managed%27%20with%20valid%20settings%20%5BSuite%3Aopenshift%2Fconformance%2Fserial%5D

https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.12/analysis?test=%5Bsig-installer%5D%5BFeature%3Abaremetal%5D%5BSerial%5D%20A%20baremetal%20deployment%20without%20a%20provisioning%20network%20should%20show%20the%20Provisioning%20Network%20as%20%27Disabled%27%20%5BSuite%3Aopenshift%2Fconformance%2Fserial%5D

Description of problem:
pkg/devfile/sample_test.go fails after devfile registry was updated (https://github.com/devfile/registry/pull/126)

This issue is about updating our assertion so that the CI job runs successfully again. We might want to backport this as well.

OCPBUGS-1678 is about updating the code that the test should use a mock response instead of the latest registry content OR check some specific attributes instead of comparing the full JSON response.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Clone openshift/console
2. Run ./test-backend.sh

Actual results:
Unit tests fail

Expected results:
Unit tests should pass again

Additional info:

Description of problem:

OVN-Kubernetes master is crashing during upgrade from 4.11.5 to 4.11.6

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.5 to 4.11.6
cannot clean up egress default deny ACL name: cannot update old NetworkPolicy ACLs for namespace ocm-myuser-1urk47c6ti1n94n1spdvo9902as3klar-sd6: error in transact with ops [{Op:update Table:ACL Row:map[action:drop direction:from-lport external_ids:{GoMap:map[default-deny-policy-type:Egress]} log:false match:inport == @a12995145443578534523_egressDefaultDeny meter:{GoSet:[acl-logging]} name:{GoSet:[ocm-myuser-1urk47c6ti1n94n1spdvo9902as3klar-sd6_egressDefaultDeny]} options:{GoMap:map[apply-after-lb:true]} priority:1000 severity:{GoSet:[info]}] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {5277db54-dd96-4c4d-bbed-99142cab91e7}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:}] results [{Count:0 Error:constraint violation Details:"ocm-myuser-1urk47c6ti1n94n1spdvo9902as3klar-sd6_egressDefaultDeny" length 65 is greater than maximum allowed length 63 UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]}] and errors 


With CSISnapshot capability is disabled, all CSI driver operators are Degraded. For example AWS EBS CSI driver operator during installation:

18:12:16.895: Some cluster operators are not ready: storage (Degraded=True AWSEBSCSIDriverOperatorCR_AWSEBSDriverStaticResourcesController_SyncError: AWSEBSCSIDriverOperatorCRDegraded: AWSEBSDriverStaticResourcesControllerDegraded: "volumesnapshotclass.yaml" (string): the server could not find the requested resource
AWSEBSCSIDriverOperatorCRDegraded: AWSEBSDriverStaticResourcesControllerDegraded: )
Ginkgo exit error 1: exit with code 1}

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12.nightly

The reason is that cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator does not create VolumeSnapshotClass CRD, which AWS EBS CSI driver operator expects to exist.

CSI driver operators must skip VolumeSnapshotClass creation if the CRD does not exist.

Description of problem:

unset field networks in topology of each failureDomain, but defines platform.vsphere.vcenters.

in install-config.yaml:

    vcenters:
    - server: xxx
      user: xxx
      password: xxx
      datacenters:
      - IBMCloud
      - datacenter-2
    failureDomains:
    - name: us-east-1
      region: us-east
      zone: us-east-1a
      topology:
        datacenter: IBMCloud
        computeCluster: /IBMCloud/host/vcs-mdcnc-workload-2
        datastore: multi-zone-ds-shared
      server: ibmvcenter.vmc-ci.devcluster.openshift.com
    - name: us-east-2
      region: us-east
      zone: us-east-2a
      topology:
        datacenter: IBMCloud
        computeCluster: /IBMCloud/host/vcs-mdcnc-workload-2
        datastore: multi-zone-ds-shared
      server: ibmvcenter.vmc-ci.devcluster.openshift.com
    - name: us-east-3

Launch installer to create cluster, get panic error

sh-4.4$ ./openshift-install create cluster --dir ipi --log-level debug
DEBUG OpenShift Installer 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-25-071630 
DEBUG Built from commit 1fb1397635c89ff8b3645fed4c4c264e4119fa84 
DEBUG Fetching Metadata...                         
...
DEBUG       Reusing previously-fetched Master Ignition Config 
DEBUG     Generating Master Machines...            
panic: runtime error: index out of range [0] with length 0goroutine 1 [running]:
github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/asset/machines/vsphere.getDefinedZones(0xc0003bec80)
    /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/asset/machines/vsphere/machinesets.go:122 +0x4f8
github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/asset/machines/vsphere.Machines({0xc0011ca0b0, 0xd}, 0xc001080c80, 0xc0005cad50, {0xc000651d10, 0x13}, {0x4ab5773, 0x6}, {0x4ad49bb, 0x10})
    /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/asset/machines/vsphere/machines.go:37 +0x250
github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/asset/machines.(*Master).Generate(0xc001118bd0, 0x5?)
 

Field platform.vsphere.failureDomains.topology.netowrks is not required in documentation.

sh-4.4$ ./openshift-install explain installconfig.platform.vsphere.failureDomains.topology
KIND:     InstallConfig
VERSION:  v1RESOURCE: <object>
  Topology describes a given failure domain using vSphere constructsFIELDS:
    computeCluster <string> -required-
      computeCluster as the failure domain This is required to be a path    datacenter <string> -required-
      datacenter is the vCenter datacenter in which virtual machines will be located and defined as the failure domain.    datastore <string> -required-
      datastore is the name or inventory path of the datastore in which the virtual machine is created/located.    folder <string>
      folder is the name or inventory path of the folder in which the virtual machine is created/located.    networks <[]string>
      networks is the list of networks within this failure domain    resourcePool <string>
      resourcePool is the absolute path of the resource pool where virtual machines will be created. The absolute path is of the form /<datacenter>/host/<cluster>/Resources/<resourcepool>. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-25-071630

How reproducible:

always when setting platform.vsphere.vcenters and unsetting platform.vsphere.failureDomains.topology.networks
It works if no set platform.vsphere.vcenters and set platform.vsphere.failureDomains.topology.networks

Steps to Reproduce:

1. configure zones in install-config.yaml, set platform.vsphere.vcenters and unset platform.vsphere.failureDomains.topology.networks
2. install IPI cluster
3.

Actual results:

installer get panic error

Expected results:

installation is successful.

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

Large OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.24 - Cluster is failing to update router-certs secret in openshift-config-managed namespace as the given secret is too big.

2022-09-01T06:24:15.157333294Z 2022-09-01T06:24:15.157Z ERROR operator.init.controller.certificate_publisher_controller controller/controller.go:266  Reconciler error  {"name": "foo-bar", "namespace": "openshift-ingress-operator", "error": "failed to ensure global secret: failed to update published router certificates secret: Secret \"router-certs\" is invalid: data: Too long: must have at most 1048576 bytes"}

The OpenShift Container Platform 4 - Cluster has 180 IngressController configured with endpointPublishingStrategy set to private.

Now the default certificate needs to be replaced but is not properly replicated to openshift-authentication namespace and potentially other location because of the problem mentioned (since the required secret can not be updated)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.24

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OpenShift Container Platform 4.10
2. Create 180 IngressController with specific certificates
3. Check openshift-ingress-operator logs to see how it fails to update/create the necessary secret in openshift-config-managed

Actual results:

2022-09-01T06:24:15.157333294Z 2022-09-01T06:24:15.157Z ERROR operator.init.controller.certificate_publisher_controller controller/controller.go:266  Reconciler error  {"name": "foo-bar", "namespace": "openshift-ingress-operator", "error": "failed to ensure global secret: failed to update published router certificates secret: Secret \"router-certs\" is invalid: data: Too long: must have at most 1048576 bytes"}

Expected results:

No matter how many IngressController is created, secret management taken care by Operators need to work, even if data exceed 1 MB size limitation. In that case an approach needs to exist to split data into multiple secrets or handle it otherwise.

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4101. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

We experienced two separate upgrade failures relating to the introduction of the SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES node sizing parameter, causing kubelet to stop running.

One cluster (clusterA) upgraded from 4.11.14 to 4.11.17. It experienced an issue whereby 
   /etc/node-sizing.env 
on its master nodes contained an empty SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES value:

---
cat /etc/node-sizing.env 
SYSTEM_RESERVED_MEMORY=5.36Gi
SYSTEM_RESERVED_CPU=0.11
SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES=
---

causing the kubelet to not start up. To restore service, this file was manually updated to set a value (1Gi), and kubelet was restarted.

We are uncertain what conditions led to this occuring on the clusterA master nodes as part of the upgrade.

A second cluster (clusterB) upgraded from 4.11.16 to 4.11.17. It experienced an issue whereby worker nodes were impacted by a similar problem, however this was because a custom node-sizing-enabled.env MachineConfig which did not set SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES

This caused existing worker nodes to go into a NotReady state after the ugprade, and additionally new nodes did not join the cluster as their kubelet would become impacted. 

For clusterB the conditions are more well-known of why the value is empty.

However, for both clusters, if SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES ends up as empty on a node it can cause the kubelet to not start. 

We have some asks as a result:
- Can MCO be made to recover from this situation if it occurs, perhaps  through application of a safe default if none exists, such that kubelet would start correctly?
- Can there possibly be alerting that could indicate and draw attention to the misconfiguration?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.17

How reproducible:

Have not been able to reproduce it on a fresh cluster upgrading from 4.11.16 to 4.11.17

Expected results:

If SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES is empty in /etc/node-sizing*env then a default should be applied and/or kubelet able to continue running.

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

{ 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-21-135326 }
How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

{See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118563#c5,
The following messages here are "normal" on startup, but it is very misleading with error statement, suggest suppress them or update them to some more clear context that we can know they are in normal process.

E0818 02:18:53.709223       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.715530       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.735885       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.775984       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.790449       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.856911       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.950782       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.017583       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.271967       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.338944       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.916988       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.982211       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue}


Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:


Description of problem:

In OCP 4.9, the package-server-manager was introduced to manage the packageserver CSV. However, when OCP 4.8 in upgraded to 4.9, the packageserver stays stuck in v0.17.0, which is the version in OCP 4.8, and v0.18.3 does not roll out, which is the version in OCP 4.9

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OCP 4.8

2. Upgrade to OCP 4.9 

$ oc get clusterversion 
NAME      VERSION                             AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.8.0-0.nightly-2022-08-31-160214   True        True          50m     Working towards 4.9.47: 619 of 738 done (83% complete)

$ oc get clusterversion 
NAME      VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.9.47    True        False         4m26s   Cluster version is 4.9.47
 

Actual results:

Check packageserver CSV. It's in v0.17.0 

$ oc get csv  NAME            DISPLAY          VERSION   REPLACES   PHASE packageserver   Package Server   0.17.0               Succeeded 

Expected results:

packageserver CSV is at 0.18.3 

Additional info:

packageserver CSV version in 4.8: https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/blob/release-4.8/manifests/0000_50_olm_15-packageserver.clusterserviceversion.yaml#L12

packageserver CSV version in 4.9: https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/blob/release-4.9/pkg/manifests/csv.yaml#L8

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3123. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Support for tech preview API extensions was introduced in https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6336 and https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/1274 .  In the case of https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/1278 , config/v1/0000_10_config-operator_01_infrastructure-TechPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml was introduced which seems to result in both 0000_10_config-operator_01_infrastructure-TechPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml and 0000_10_config-operator_01_infrastructure-Default.crd.yaml being rendered by the bootstrap.  As a result, both CRDs are created during bootstrap.  However, one of them(in this case the tech preview CRD) fails to be created.  

We may need to modify the render command to be aware of feature gates when rendering manifests during bootstrap.  Also, I'm open hearing other views on how this might work. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

https://github.com/openshift/cluster-config-operator/pull/269 built and running on 4.12-ec5 

How reproducible:

consistently

Steps to Reproduce:

1. bump the version of OpenShift API to one including a tech preview version of the infrastructure CRD
2. install openshift with the infrastructure manifest modified to incorporate tech preview fields
3. those fields will not be populated upon installation

Also, checking the logs from bootkube will show both being installed, but one of them fails.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

Excerpts from bootkube log
Nov 02 20:40:01 localhost.localdomain bootkube.sh[4216]: Writing asset: /assets/config-bootstrap/manifests/0000_10_config-operator_01_infrastructure-TechPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml
Nov 02 20:40:01 localhost.localdomain bootkube.sh[4216]: Writing asset: /assets/config-bootstrap/manifests/0000_10_config-operator_01_infrastructure-Default.crd.yaml


Nov 02 20:41:23 localhost.localdomain bootkube.sh[5710]: Created "0000_10_config-operator_01_infrastructure-Default.crd.yaml" customresourcedefinitions.v1.apiextensions.k8s.io/infrastructures.config.openshift.io -n
Nov 02 20:41:23 localhost.localdomain bootkube.sh[5710]: Skipped "0000_10_config-operator_01_infrastructure-TechPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml" customresourcedefinitions.v1.apiextensions.k8s.io/infrastructures.config.openshift.io -n  as it already exists

 

 

 

Clone of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGSM-44162.

Cannot use the original as the bot won't accept a security bug:

When the change merges, the Bugzilla associated with the CVE must be set to MODIFIED. Since the DPTP bugzilla bot is not permitted to scan bugs with the SECURITY group in Bugzilla, The REP will not be able to use the bot's public functionality of moving their bug to MODIFIED.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KuenDafC3Ukw19jY55tkVeH8nNVVAi8TEAfqynoVfzY/edit#heading=h.ikdk6suc575k

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1327. The following is the description of the original issue:

See this comment for some updated information

Description of problem:
During IPI installation on IBM Cloud (x86_64), some of the worker machines have been seen to have no network connectivity during their initial bootup. Investigations were performed with IBM Cloud VPC to attempt to identify the issue, but in all appearances, all virtualization appears to be working.

Unfortunately due to this issue, no network traffic, no access to these worker machines is available to help identify the issue (Ignition is stuck without network traffic), so no SSH or console login is available to collect logs, or perform any testing on these machines.

The only content available is the console output, showing ignition is stuck due to the network issue.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12.0

How reproducible:
About 60%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create an IPI cluster on IBM Cloud
2. Wait for the worker machines to be provisioned, causing IPI to fail waiting on machine-api operator
3. Check console of worker machines failing to report in to cluster (in this case 2 of 3 failed)

Actual results:
IPI creation failed waiting on machine-api operator to complete all worker node deployment

Expected results:
Successful IPI creation on IBM Cloud

Additional info:
As stated, investigation was performed by IBM Cloud VPC, but no further investigation could be performed since no access to these worker machines is available. Any further details that could be provided to help identify the issue would be helpful.

This appears to have become more prominent recently as well, causing concern for IBM Cloud's IPI GA support on the 4.12 release.

The only solution to restore network connectivity is rebooting the machine, which loses ignition bring up (I assume it must be triggered manually now), and in the case of IPI, isn't a great mitigation.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3767. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Start maintenance action moved from Nodes tab to Bare Metal Hosts tab

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Cluster version is 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-11-15-024309

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install Node Maintenance operator
2. Go Compute -> Nodes
3. Start maintenance from 3dots menu of worker-0-0
see https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/nodes/nodes/eco-node-maintenance-operator.html#eco-setting-node-maintenance-actions-web-console_node-maintenance-operator

Actual results:

No 'Start maintenance' option

Expected results:

Maintenance started successfully

Additional info:

worked for 4.11

 

 

Description of problem:

 

During ocp multinode spoke cluster creation agent provisioning is stuck on "configuring" because machineConfig service is crashing on the node.
After restarting the service still fails with 

Can't read link "/var/lib/containers/storage/overlay/l/V2OP2CCVMKSOHK2XICC546DUCG" because it does not exist. A storage corruption might have occurred, attempting to recreate the missing symlinks. It might be best wipe the storage to avoid further errors due to storage corruption. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Podman 4.0.2 + 

How reproducible:

sometimes

Steps to Reproduce:

1. deploy multinode spoke (ipxe + boot order )
2.
3.

Actual results:

4 agents in done state and 1 is in "configuring"

 

Expected results:

all agents are in "done" state

Additional info:

issue mentioned in https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/14003

 

Fix: https://github.com/containers/storage/issues/1136

 

 

 

Description of problem:

The current version of openshift/router vendors Kubernetes 1.24 packages.  OpenShift 4.12 is based on Kubernetes 1.25.  

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Check https://github.com/openshift/router/blob/release-4.12/go.mod 

Actual results:

Kubernetes packages (k8s.io/api, k8s.io/apimachinery, and k8s.io/client-go) are at version v0.24.0.

Expected results:

Kubernetes packages are at version v0.25.0 or later.

Additional info:

Using old Kubernetes API and client packages brings risk of API compatibility issues.

This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2073220](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073220). The following is the description of the original bug:

Description of problem:

https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.10/security/audit-log-policy-config.html#about-audit-log-profiles_audit-log-policy-config

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.*

How reproducible: always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Set audit profile to WriteRequestBodies
2. Wait for api server rollout to complete
3. tail -f /var/log/kube-apiserver/audit.log | grep routes/status

Actual results:

Write events to routes/status are recorded at the RequestResponse level, which often includes keys and certificates.

Expected results:

Events involving routes should always be recorded at the Metadata level, per the documentation at https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.10/security/audit-log-policy-config.html#about-audit-log-profiles_audit-log-policy-config

Additional info:

Description of problem:
When disable all helm chart repos the helm navigation item is disabled.

To re-enable the helm charts again the user can search for HCP or PHCPs but the action menu doesn't work if no other helm chart repo is enabled.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Only 4.12 (4.11 is fine)

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Switch to developer perspective
2. Navigate to Helm > Repos > Edit the default repo and disable it
3. Helm Navigation should disappear and the content area maybe switch to 404, that's fine.
4. Navigate to Search and select HelmChartRepository as resource
5. Click on the action menu (kebab icon) to edit the HCR

Actual results:
The action menu is not shown

Expected results:
The action menu should be shown so that the user can edit or delete the HCR.

Additional info:

Description of problem:

The current version of openshift/cluster-dns-operator vendors Kubernetes 1.24 packages.  OpenShift 4.12 is based on Kubernetes 1.25.  

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Check https://github.com/openshift/cluster-dns-operator/blob/release-4.12/go.mod  

Actual results:

Kubernetes packages (k8s.io/api, k8s.io/apimachinery, and k8s.io/client-go) are at version v0.24.0.

Expected results:

Kubernetes packages are at version v0.25.0 or later.

Additional info:

Using old Kubernetes API and client packages brings risk of API compatibility issues.

CI is failing due to the updated pod security admission controller. We need to update the console test pods with the correct security values.

Error: Command failed: echo '{"apiVersion":"v1","kind":"Pod","metadata":

{"name":"test-jxlpt-event-test-pod","namespace":"test-jxlpt"}

,"spec":{"containers":[

{"name":"httpd","image":"image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/openshift/httpd:latest"}

]}}' | kubectl create -n test-jxlpt -f -
Error from server (Forbidden): error when creating "STDIN": pods "test-jxlpt-event-test-pod" is forbidden: violates PodSecurity "restricted:v1.24": allowPrivilegeEscalation != false (container "httpd" must set securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation=false), unrestricted capabilities (container "httpd" must set securityContext.capabilities.drop=["ALL"]), runAsNonRoot != true (pod or container "httpd" must set securityContext.runAsNonRoot=true), seccompProfile (pod or container "httpd" must set securityContext.seccompProfile.type to "RuntimeDefault" or "Localhost")

Description of problem:

To address: 'Static Pod is managed but errored" err="managed container xxx does not have Resource.Requests'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

Already merged in https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-controller-manager-operator/pull/660

Since 4.11 OCP comes with OperatorHub definition which declares a capability
and enables all catalog sources. For OKD we want to enable just community-operators
as users may not have Red Hat pull secret set.
This commit would ensure that OKD version of marketplace operator gets
its own OperatorHub manifest with a custom set of operator catalogs enabled

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3283. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

We discovered that we are shipping unnecesary RBAC in https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CC3CZCQHM/p1667571136730989 .

This RBAC was only used 4.2 and 4.3 for

  • for making a switch from configMaps to leases in leader election

and we should remove it

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):{code:none}

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

If a master fails and is drained, the old copy of the metal3 pod gets stuck in Terminating state for some (possibly long) time. While the new pod works correctly, CBO expects only one port to exist and thus cannot determine the applicable Ironic IP address.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. On dev-scripts: virsh destroy <VM with metal3 pod>
2. Wait for drain to happen or trigger it manually
3. Check CBO logs

Actual results:

"unable to determine Ironic's IP to pass to the machine-image-customization-controller: there should be only one pod listed for the given label"

Expected results:

CBO reconfigures its pods with the new Ironic IP

Additional info:

I don't know how to filter out pods in Terminating state...

In multinode we can check nodes object in kubeapi as we can't really validate hosts that are not part of cluster, only the one controller is running on.

And we should validate ip of the host controller is running on.

In case ip was changed log it

This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2100429](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100429). The following is the description of the original bug:

Description of problem:
[apiserver-auth] default SCC restricted allow volumes don't have "ephemeral" caused deployment with Generic Ephemeral Volumes stuck at Pending

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Cluster version is 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-06-22-190830
$ oc version
Client Version: 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-05-11-054135
Kustomize Version: v4.5.4
Server Version: 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-06-22-190830
Kubernetes Version: v1.24.0+284d62a

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Set up a AWS OCP cluster with 4.11 nightly
2. Create a deployment with Generic Ephemeral Volumes
3. Waiting for the deployment ready and check the volume could write and read data

Test data:
wangpenghao@MacBook-Pro ~ cat temp.yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: my-dep
spec:
replicas: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
app: my-dep
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: my-dep
spec:
containers:

  • image: >-
    quay.io/openshifttest/hello-openshift@sha256:b1aabe8c8272f750ce757b6c4263a2712796297511e0c6df79144ee188933623
    name: my-container
    ports:
  • containerPort: 80
    volumeMounts:
  • mountPath: /mnt/storage
    name: inline-volume
    volumes:
  • name: inline-volume
    ephemeral:
    volumeClaimTemplate:
    metadata:
    labels:
    workloadName: my-dep
    spec:
    accessModes:
  • ReadWriteOnce
    storageClassName: gp3-csi
    resources:
    requests:
    storage: 1Gi
    wangpenghao@MacBook-Pro ~ oc apply -f temp.yaml
    Warning: would violate PodSecurity "restricted:v1.24": allowPrivilegeEscalation != false (container "my-dep-mcxx803w" must set securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation=false), unrestricted capabilities (container "my-dep-mcxx803w" must set securityContext.capabilities.drop=["ALL"]), runAsNonRoot != true (pod or container "my-dep-mcxx803w" must set securityContext.runAsNonRoot=true), seccompProfile (pod or container "my-dep-mcxx803w" must set securityContext.seccompProfile.type to "RuntimeDefault" or "Localhost")
    deployment.apps/my-dep created
    wangpenghao@MacBook-Pro ~ oc get deploy
    NAME READY UP-TO-DATE AVAILABLE AGE
    my-dep 0/1 0 0 7s
    wangpenghao@MacBook-Pro ~ oc get event
    LAST SEEN TYPE REASON OBJECT MESSAGE
    5s Warning FailedCreate replicaset/my-dep-6bd958d877 Error creating: pods "my-dep-6bd958d877-" is forbidden: unable to validate against any security context constraint: [provider "anyuid": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, spec.volumes[0]: Invalid value: "ephemeral": ephemeral volumes are not allowed to be used, provider "restricted": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "nonroot-v2": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "nonroot": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "hostmount-anyuid": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "machine-api-termination-handler": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "hostnetwork-v2": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "hostnetwork": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "hostaccess": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "node-exporter": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "privileged": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount]
    16s Normal ScalingReplicaSet deployment/my-dep Scaled up replica set my-dep-6bd958d877 to 1

Actual results:
In Step3 : The deployment stucked at Pending caused by unable to validate against any security context constraint

Expected results:
In Step3 : The deployment should ready with the default scc restricted, the default scc restricted should allow
volumes:

  • ephemeral

Additional info:

Generic ephemeral volumes are the safer option of these two - it just creates/deletes PVCs on behalf of users. And most users can already create PVCs.

ephemeral type volume not in scc.volumes list definition
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.10/authentication/managing-security-context-constraints.html#authorization-cont[…]ing-internal-oauth

So currently if customers want to use ephemeral type volume have to use scc with:
volumes:

  • '*'
    E.g. scc/privileged

Discuss record: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CB48XQ4KZ/p1655465586780419

Generic Ephemeral Volumes docs:
https://kubernetes.io/blog/2020/09/01/ephemeral-volumes-with-storage-capacity-tracking/#generic-ephemeral-volumes

Master Log:

Node Log (of failed PODs):

PV Dump:

PVC Dump:

StorageClass Dump (if StorageClass used by PV/PVC):

Description of problem:

AWS tagging - when applying user defined tags you cannot add more than 10

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Configure userTags for aws platform with more than 8 tags.
2. Installer fails to add the tags while AWS supports upto 50 tags.

Actual results:

Installer validation fails.

Expected results:

Installer should be able to add more than 8 tags.

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

Installer fails due to Neutron policy error when creating Openstack servers for OCP master nodes.

$ oc get machines -A
NAMESPACE               NAME                          PHASE          TYPE   REGION   ZONE   AGE
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-master-0         Running                               23h
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-master-1         Running                               23h
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-master-2         Running                               23h
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-g7nrw   Provisioning                          23h
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-lrkvb   Provisioning                          23h
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-vwrsk   Provisioning                          23h

$ oc -n openshift-machine-api logs machine-api-controllers-7454f5d65b-8fqx2 -c machine-controller
[...]
E1018 10:51:49.355143       1 controller.go:317] controller/machine_controller "msg"="Reconciler error" "error"="error creating Openstack instance: Failed to create port err: Request forbidden: [POST https://overcloud.redhat.local:13696/v2.0/ports], error message: {\"NeutronError\": {\"type\": \"PolicyNotAuthorized\", \"message\": \"(rule:create_port and (rule:create_port:allowed_address_pairs and (rule:create_port:allowed_address_pairs:ip_address and rule:create_port:allowed_address_pairs:ip_address))) is disallowed by policy\", \"detail\": \"\"}}" "name"="ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-lrkvb" "namespace"="openshift-machine-api"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-10-14-023020

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install 4.10 within provider networks (in primary or secondary interface)

Actual results:

Installation failure:
4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-10-14-023020: some cluster operators have not yet rolled out

Expected results:

Successful installation

Additional info:

Please find must-gather for installation on primary interface link here and for installation on secondary interface link here.

 

I saw the following while trying to debug the following "unexpectedly found multiple equivalent ACLs" error.

Add a generic networkpolicy:

kind: NetworkPolicy
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: allow-same-namespace
namespace: nbc9-demo-project
spec:
podSelector: {}
ingress:

  • from:
  • podSelector: {}
    policyTypes:
  • Ingress

$ kubectl get pod ovnkube-master-pk89w -o jsonpath='

{range .spec.containers[]} {@.image}

'
quay.io/openshift/okd-content@sha256:79ee71e045a7b224a132f6c75b4220ec35b9a06049061a6bd9ca9fc976c412e5

[root@dev-nkjpp-master-2 ~]# ovnkube -v
I0609 17:33:34.930787 58 ovs.go:93] Maximum command line arguments set to: 191102
Version: 0.3.0
Git commit: 7bf36eea28fe66365d0dfdf8c39e3311ea14d19b
Git branch: release-4.10
Go version: go1.16.6
Build date: 2022-05-27
OS/Arch: linux amd64

Which then fails to apply, retries, and when the networkpolicy is deleted, the ovnkube-master pod segfaults:

I0609 17:00:26.653710 1 policy.go:1092] Adding network policy allow-same-namespace in namespace nbc9-demo-project
E0609 17:00:26.656858 1 ovn.go:753] Failed to create network policy nbc9-demo-project/allow-same-namespace, error: failed to create default port groups and acls for policy: nbc9-demo-project/allow-same-namespace, error: unexpectedly found multiple equivalent ACLs: [

{UUID:7b55ba0c-150f-4a63-9601-cfde25f29408 Action:drop Direction:from-lport ExternalIDs:map[default-deny-policy-type:Egress] Label:0 Log:false Match:inport == @a7830797310894963783_egressDefaultDeny Meter:0xc0010df310 Name:0xc0010df320 Options:map[apply-after-lb:true] Priority:1000 Severity:0xc0010df330}

{UUID:60cb946a-46e9-4623-9ba4-3cb35f018ed6 Action:drop Direction:from-lport ExternalIDs:map[default-deny-policy-type:Egress] Label:0 Log:false Match:inport == @a7830797310894963783_egressDefaultDeny Meter:0xc0010df390 Name:0xc0010df3d0 Options:map[apply-after-lb:true] Priority:1000 Severity:0xc0010df3e0}

]
I0609 17:00:51.437895 1 policy_retry.go:46] Network Policy Retry: nbc9-demo-project/allow-same-namespace retry network policy setup
I0609 17:00:51.437935 1 policy_retry.go:63] Network Policy Retry: Creating new policy for nbc9-demo-project/allow-same-namespace
I0609 17:00:51.437941 1 policy.go:1092] Adding network policy allow-same-namespace in namespace nbc9-demo-project
I0609 17:00:51.438174 1 policy_retry.go:65] Network Policy Retry create failed for nbc9-demo-project/allow-same-namespace, will try again later: failed to create default port groups and acls for policy: nbc9-demo-project/allow-same-namespace, error: unexpectedly found multiple equivalent ACLs: [

{UUID:60cb946a-46e9-4623-9ba4-3cb35f018ed6 Action:drop Direction:from-lport ExternalIDs:map[default-deny-policy-type:Egress] Label:0 Log:false Match:inport == @a7830797310894963783_egressDefaultDeny Meter:0xc002215e00 Name:0xc002215e70 Options:map[apply-after-lb:true] Priority:1000 Severity:0xc002215e80}

{UUID:7b55ba0c-150f-4a63-9601-cfde25f29408 Action:drop Direction:from-lport ExternalIDs:map[default-deny-policy-type:Egress] Label:0 Log:false Match:inport == @a7830797310894963783_egressDefaultDeny Meter:0xc0022b0310 Name:0xc0022b03a0 Options:map[apply-after-lb:true] Priority:1000 Severity:0xc000070ab0}

]
I0609 17:01:02.679219 1 policy.go:1174] Deleting network policy allow-same-namespace in namespace nbc9-demo-project

E0609 17:01:02.679407 1 runtime.go:78] Observed a panic: "invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" (runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference)
goroutine 249 [running]:
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.logPanic(0x1c19c80, 0x2e9a810)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:74 +0x95
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.HandleCrash(0x0, 0x0, 0x0)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:48 +0x86
panic(0x1c19c80, 0x2e9a810)
/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:965 +0x1b9
github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/ovn.(*Controller).destroyNetworkPolicy(0xc0022c2000, 0x0, 0xc000bb9000, 0x0, 0x0)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/ovn/policy.go:1210 +0x55
github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/ovn.(*Controller).deleteNetworkPolicy(0xc0022c2000, 0xc002544f00, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/ovn/policy.go:1198 +0x43f
github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/ovn.(*Controller).WatchNetworkPolicy.func4(0x1e7e840, 0xc002544f00)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/ovn/ovn.go:800 +0xae
k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache.ResourceEventHandlerFuncs.OnDelete(...)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache/controller.go:245
k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache.FilteringResourceEventHandler.OnDelete(0xc000f4c4c0, 0x2160f10, 0xc002f498c0, 0x1e7e840, 0xc002544f00)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache/controller.go:288 +0x6a
github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/factory.(*Handler).OnDelete(...)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/factory/handler.go:52
github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/factory.(*informer).newFederatedHandler.func3.1(0xc00463dbf0)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/factory/handler.go:340 +0x65
github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/factory.(*informer).forEachHandler(0xc0002c61b0, 0x1e7e840, 0xc002544f00, 0xc003dc9d60)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/factory/handler.go:114 +0x156
github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/factory.(*informer).newFederatedHandler.func3(0x1e7e840, 0xc002544f00)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/factory/handler.go:339 +0x1b2
k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache.ResourceEventHandlerFuncs.OnDelete(...)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache/controller.go:245
k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache.(*processorListener).run.func1()
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache/shared_informer.go:779 +0x166
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.BackoffUntil.func1(0xc002367760)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:155 +0x5f
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.BackoffUntil(0xc003dc9f60, 0x2127a00, 0xc000229a70, 0x1bd5d01, 0xc000039740)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:156 +0x9b
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.JitterUntil(0xc002367760, 0x3b9aca00, 0x0, 0x1, 0xc000039740)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:133 +0x98
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.Until(...)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:90
k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache.(*processorListener).run(0xc0004f3180)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache/shared_informer.go:771 +0x95
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.(*Group).Start.func1(0xc0002bed80, 0xc000ed5850)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:73 +0x51
created by k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.(*Group).Start
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:71 +0x65
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference [recovered]
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x0 pc=0x1a021d5]

goroutine 249 [running]:
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.HandleCrash(0x0, 0x0, 0x0)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:55 +0x109
panic(0x1c19c80, 0x2e9a810)
/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:965 +0x1b9
github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/ovn.(*Controller).destroyNetworkPolicy(0xc0022c2000, 0x0, 0xc000bb9000, 0x0, 0x0)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/ovn/policy.go:1210 +0x55
github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/ovn.(*Controller).deleteNetworkPolicy(0xc0022c2000, 0xc002544f00, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/ovn/policy.go:1198 +0x43f
github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/ovn.(*Controller).WatchNetworkPolicy.func4(0x1e7e840, 0xc002544f00)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/ovn/ovn.go:800 +0xae
k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache.ResourceEventHandlerFuncs.OnDelete(...)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache/controller.go:245
k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache.FilteringResourceEventHandler.OnDelete(0xc000f4c4c0, 0x2160f10, 0xc002f498c0, 0x1e7e840, 0xc002544f00)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache/controller.go:288 +0x6a
github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/factory.(*Handler).OnDelete(...)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/factory/handler.go:52
github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/factory.(*informer).newFederatedHandler.func3.1(0xc00463dbf0)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/factory/handler.go:340 +0x65
github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/factory.(*informer).forEachHandler(0xc0002c61b0, 0x1e7e840, 0xc002544f00, 0xc003dc9d60)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/factory/handler.go:114 +0x156
github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/factory.(*informer).newFederatedHandler.func3(0x1e7e840, 0xc002544f00)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/factory/handler.go:339 +0x1b2
k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache.ResourceEventHandlerFuncs.OnDelete(...)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache/controller.go:245
k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache.(*processorListener).run.func1()
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache/shared_informer.go:779 +0x166
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.BackoffUntil.func1(0xc002367760)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:155 +0x5f
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.BackoffUntil(0xc003dc9f60, 0x2127a00, 0xc000229a70, 0x1bd5d01, 0xc000039740)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:156 +0x9b
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.JitterUntil(0xc002367760, 0x3b9aca00, 0x0, 0x1, 0xc000039740)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:133 +0x98
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.Until(...)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:90
k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache.(*processorListener).run(0xc0004f3180)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache/shared_informer.go:771 +0x95
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.(*Group).Start.func1(0xc0002bed80, 0xc000ed5850)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:73 +0x51
created by k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.(*Group).Start
/go/src/github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:71 +0x65

Please let me know if any further information is required. I have a must-gather for this cluster but the file attachment tool in bugzilla won't let me attach anything larger than 19.5MB (the must-gather is 212.1MB)

In order to support 4.12 there needs to be an entry for OS_IMAGES in images.env.template.

 

Note that the actual url isn't important, just that there is an entry for 4.12.

Create a script that gathers debug information from a host running the agent ISO and exports it in a standard format so that we can ask customers to provide it for debugging when something has gone wrong (and also use it in CI).

For now, it is fine to require the user to ssh into the host to run the script. The script should be already in place inside the agent ISO.

The output should probably be a compressed tar file. That file could be saved locally, or potentially piped to stdout so that a user only has to run a command like: ssh node0 -c agent-gather >node0.tgz

Things we need to collect:

  • systemctl status and journal for each of the systemd services created by the agent installer (ideally this should be determined programmatically so we can't forget to add any)
  • network information: ifconfig; ip -j -p addr
  • Data supplied by the agent installer in /etc/assisted/*
  • /etc/containers/registries.conf
  • /etc/assisted-service/node0 (if it exists)
  • /usr/local/share/assisted-service/*.env

We added server groups for control plane and computes as part of OSASINFRA-2570, except for UPI that only creates server group for the control plane.

We need to update the UPI scripts to create server group for computes to be consistent with IPI and have the instruction at https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/machine_management/creating_machinesets/creating-machineset-osp.html work out of the box in case customers want to create MachineSets on their UPI clusters.

Related to OCPCLOUD-1135.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1427. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Jump looks the worst on gcp, but looking closer Azure and AWS both jumped as well just not as high.

Disruption data indicates that the image registry on GCP was averaging around 30-40 seconds of disruption during an upgrade, until Aug 27th when it jumped to 125-135 seconds and has remained there ever since.

We see similar spikes in ingress-to-console and ingress-to-oauth. NOTE: image registry backend is also behind ingress, so all three are ingress related disruption.

https://datastudio.google.com/s/uBC4zuBFdTE

These charts show the problem on Aug 27 for registry, ingress to console, and ingress to oauth.

sdn network type appears unaffected.

Something merged Aug 26-27 that caused a significant change for anything behind ingress using ovn on gcp.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2260. The following is the description of the original issue:

TRT-594 investigates failed CI upgrade runs due to alert KubePodNotReady firing.  The case was a pod getting skipped over for scheduling over two successive master node update / restarts.  The case was determined valid so the ask is to be able to have the monitoring aware that master nodes are restarting and scheduling may be delayed.   Presuming we don't want to change the existing tolerance for the non master node restart cases could we suppress it during those restarts and fall back to a second alert with increased tolerances only during those restarts, if we have metrics indicating we are restarting.  Or similar if there are better ways to handle.

The scenario is:

  • A master node (1) is out of service during upgrade
  • A pod (A) is created but can not be scheduled due to anti-affinity rules as the other nodes already host a pod of that definition
  • A second pod (B) from the same definition is created after the first
  • Pod (A) attempts scheduling but fails as the master (1) node is still updating
  • Master (1) node completes updating
  • Pod (B) attempts scheduling and succeeds
  • Next Master (2) node begins updating
  • Pod (A) can not be scheduled on the next attempt(s) as the active master nodes already have pods placed and the next master (2) node is unavailable
  • Master (2) node completes updating
  • Pod (A) is scheduled

Currently, we have this validation  https://github.com/openshift/installer/blob/master/pkg/asset/agent/installconfig_test.go#L103 which checks if the platform is none then the number of control planes should be 1 and workers should be zero.

We need another validation to check if the number of control planes is 1 and workers are zero, the in the install-config.yaml the platform can only be set as none and in agent-cluster-install.yaml, the platformType should only be set as none. If we try to do SNO (i.e. control planes is 1 and workers are zero)  with e.g. platform: baremetal then assisted will reject it, so we should catch it as early as possible

Description of problem:

The icon color of Alerts in the Topology list view should be based on alert type.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. create a deployment
2. Create a resource quota so that quota alert will be visible in topology list page
3. navigate to topology list page
3.

Actual results:

Alert icon color is black and white. See the screenshots

Expected results:

Alert icon color should be base on alert type. 

Additional info:

 

Similar to how we generate the kubeconfig at the same time as the ISO, we should also generate the admin password.

This will require changes to the installer to allow assisted-service to pass at least the hash of the password in to the installer process that generates the bootstrap ignition, similar in concept to the changes made to pass the kubeconfig.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3304. The following is the description of the original issue:

Assisted-service can use only one mirror of the release image. In the install-config, the user may specify multiple matching mirrors. Currently the last matching mirror is the one used by assisted-service. This is confusing; we should use the first matching one instead.

Description of problem:

seeing test failure due to panic in cvo here:

Undiagnosed panic detected in pod expand_less
              0s

                {  pods/openshift-cluster-version_cluster-version-operator-96cf55b5-rffgt_cluster-version-operator_previous.log.gz:E0915 18:38:42.763315       1 runtime.go:79] Observed a panic: "invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" (runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference)
pods/openshift-cluster-version_cluster-version-operator-96cf55b5-rffgt_cluster-version-operator_previous.log.gz:E0915 18:38:42.763418       1 runtime.go:79] Observed a panic: "invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" (runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference)}

full error from logs:

/E0915 18:38:42.763315       1 runtime.go:79] Observed a panic: "invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" (runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference)
goroutine 187 [running]:
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.logPanic({0x1934980?, 0x2bc6240})
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:75 +0x99
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.HandleCrash({0x0, 0x0, 0x4d2604?})
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:49 +0x75
panic({0x1934980, 0x2bc6240})
	/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:838 +0x207
github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo.(*SyncWorker).calculateNext(0xc0015c6000, 0xc001df2000)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo/sync_worker.go:716 +0x14d
github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo.(*SyncWorker).Start.func1()
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo/sync_worker.go:575 +0x2a9
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.BackoffUntil.func1(0x10000000000?)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:155 +0x3e
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.BackoffUntil(0xc001df2000?, {0x1e44e60, 0xc002739f50}, 0x1, 0xc00058e0c0)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:156 +0xb6
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.JitterUntil(0x0?, 0x989680, 0x0, 0x60?, 0x0?)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:133 +0x89
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.Until(...)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:90
github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo.(*SyncWorker).Start(0xc0015c6000?, {0x1e5eb30?, 0xc0000cacc0?}, 0x10?, {0x0?, 0x0?}, {0x0?, 0x0?})
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo/sync_worker.go:556 +0x145
github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo.(*Operator).Run.func2()
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo/cvo.go:387 +0x83
created by github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo.(*Operator).Run
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo/cvo.go:385 +0x4af
E0915 18:38:42.763418       1 runtime.go:79] Observed a panic: "invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" (runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference) 

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

currently unsure hit this in a test run, but shouldn't ever panic.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

panic in cvo pod

Expected results:

no panic in cvo pod

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

Event souces are not shown in topology

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Have verified it on 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-095559

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install Serverless operator
2. Create CR for knative-serving and knative-eventing respectively
3. Create/select a ns -> go to dev console -> add -> event souce
4. Create any event source

 

 

Actual results:

Can't see created resouoce(Event source) in topology

Expected results:

Should be able to see created resoouce on topology

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

Pod and PDB list page just report "Not found" when no resources found 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-15-094115

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. normal user has a new empty project
2. normal user visit PDB list page via Workloads ->  PodDisruptionBudgets 
3.

Actual results:

2. it just reports 'Not found'

Expected results:

2. for other workloads, it will report "No <resource> found", for example
No HorizontalPodAutoscalers found
No StatefulSets found
No Deployments found

so for Pods and PodDisruptionBudgets list page, when no resource can be found, it's better that we also reports "No pods found" and "No PodDisruptionBudgets found"

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

This is the original bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098054

It was fixed in https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1340 but was reverted as it introduced a bug that meant we did not register instances on create for NLB services.

Need to fix the issue and reintroduce the fix

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3214. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

The installer has logic that avoids adding the router CAs to the kubeconfig if the console is not available.  It's not clear why it does this, but it means that the router CAs don't get added when the console is deliberately disabled (it is now an optional capability in 4.12).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Seen in 4.12+4.13

How reproducible:

Always, when starting a cluster w/o the Console capability

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Edit the install-config to set:
capabilities:
  baselineCapabilitySet: None
2. install the cluster
3. check the CAs in the kubeconfig, the wildcard route CA will be missing (compare it w/ a normal cluster)

Actual results:

router CAs missing

Expected results:

router CAs should be present

Additional info:

This needs to be backported to 4.12.

Description of problem:

Disconnected IPI OCP 4.10.22 cluster install on baremetal fails when hostname of master nodes does not include "master"    

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.10.22

How reproducible:  Perform disconnected IPI install of OCP 4.10.22 on bare metal with master nodes that do not contain the text "master"

Steps to Reproduce:

Perform disconnected IPI install of OCP 4.10.22 on bare metal with master nodes that do not contain the text "master"

Actual results: master nodes do come up.

Expected results: master nodes should come up despite that the text "master" is not in their hostname.

Additional info:

Disconnected IPI OCP 4.10.22 cluster install on baremetal fails when hostname of master nodes does not include "master"    

The code for the cluster-baremetal-operator at the following link: 

https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/blob/49d7b249c5dcef8228f206eff4530a25f03b201f/controllers/provisioning_controller.go#L441

The following condition is concerning:

if strings.Contains(bmh.Name, "master") && len(bmh.Spec.BootMACAddress) > 0

The packages reveal that bmh.Name references the name inside the metadata of the BMH object. 

Should a customer have masters with names that do not include the text "master", the above condition can never become true, and so, the following slice is never created :

macs = append(macs, bmh.Spec.BootMACAddress)

 

 

In order to start 4.12 development, we need to merge the agent-installer branch. We need to create a PR and engage the Installer team on getting it approved

Description of problem:

metal3 pod does not come up on SNO when creating Provisioning with provisioningNetwork set to Disabled

The issue is that on SNO, there is no Machine, and no BareMetalHost, it is looking of Machine objects to populate the provisioningMacAddresses field. However, when provisioningNetwork is Disabled, provisioningMacAddresses is not used anyway.

You can work around this issue by populating provisioningMacAddresses with a dummy address, like this:

kind: Provisioning
metadata:
  name: provisioning-configuration
spec:
  provisioningMacAddresses:
  - aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa
  provisioningNetwork: Disabled
  watchAllNamespaces: true

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.17

How reproducible:

Try to bring up Provisioning on SNO in 4.11.17 with provisioningNetwork set to Disabled

apiVersion: metal3.io/v1alpha1
kind: Provisioning
metadata:
  name: provisioning-configuration
spec:
  provisioningNetwork: Disabled
  watchAllNamespaces: true

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

controller/provisioning "msg"="Reconciler error" "error"="machines with cluster-api-machine-role=master not found" "name"="provisioning-configuration" "namespace"="" "reconciler group"="metal3.io" "reconciler kind"="Provisioning"

Expected results:

metal3 pod should be deployed

Additional info:

This issue is a result of this change: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/pull/307
See this Slack thread: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CFP6ST0A3/p1670530729168599

Description of problem:

When providing the openshift-install agent create command with installconfig + agentconfig manifests that contain the InstallConfig Proxy section, the Proxy configuration does not get configured cluster-wide.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Define InstallConfig with Proxy section
2.openshift-install agent create image
3.Boot ISO
4.Check /etc/assisted/manifests for agent-cluster-install.yaml to contain the Proxy section 

Actual results:

Missing proxy

Expected results:

Proxy should be present and match with the InstallConfig

Additional info:

 

AWS CPMS changes made here causes the single node clusters to fail installation
https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6172

 

Need to fix the issue by checking and not creating the CPMS manifest if the installation type is single node.

Description of problem:

We got a feedback from the support team that it is confusing to see switch in the Notifications column for the Alerting rule which have no alerts associated to it as user can not silence the Alerting rule. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. oc apply -f https://gist.githubusercontent.com/vikram-raj/727629797eb9d9bfcfa2721cae2ade86/raw/7c2305e14115a1a4f4f88ebb74cdad32cbec4132/Alerting%2520rule%2520without%2520alert 
2. navigate to the Developer perspective Observe -> Alerts
3. Try to silence the VersionAlert alerting rule, nothing will happen 

Actual results:

Silence the alerting rule using the switch will do nothing

Expected results:

No switch for silence the alerting rule should be visible if no alerts are associated to the alerting rule.

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

Installation fails on AWS because the installer manifests include an invalid ingresses.config.openshift.io/cluster manifest.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.

How reproducible:

Seems to be a consistent failure.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install a cluster on AWS without specifying lbType in the install-config.

Actual results:

The cluster bootstrap fails with the following error message:

"cluster-ingress-02-config.yml": failed to create ingresses.v1.config.openshift.io/cluster -n : Ingress.config.openshift.io "cluster" is invalid: spec.loadBalancer.platform.aws.type: Required value
 

Expected results:

Cluster bootstrap should succeed.

Additional info:

https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6478 introduced the problematic logic that sets spec.loadBalancer.platform.aws without setting spec.loadBalancer.platform.aws.type.

 

Description of problem:

Seeing intermittently during cluster installs

Network operator stuck in Progressing with 

network                       4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-25-210451   True        True          False      117m    DaemonSet "/openshift-network-diagnostics/network-check-target" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)


MG: http://shell.lab.bos.redhat.com/~anusaxen/must-gather.local.5450303633101217331/

iptables-save on master-2 node - http://shell.lab.bos.redhat.com/~anusaxen/iptables-save


pod events
Events:
  Type     Reason                  Age                   From               Message
  ----     ------                  ----                  ----               -------
  Normal   Scheduled               129m                  default-scheduler  Successfully assigned openshift-network-diagnostics/network-check-target-gnld6 to qe-anurag114e-9xkz4-master-2.c.openshift-qe.internal
  Warning  FailedMount             128m (x7 over 129m)   kubelet            MountVolume.SetUp failed for volume "kube-api-access-kfg5s" : [object "openshift-network-diagnostics"/"kube-root-ca.crt" not registered, object "openshift-network-diagnostics"/"openshift-service-ca.crt" not registered]
  Warning  NetworkNotReady         128m (x18 over 129m)  kubelet            network is not ready: container runtime network not ready: NetworkReady=false reason:NetworkPluginNotReady message:Network plugin returns error: No CNI configuration file in /etc/kubernetes/cni/net.d/. Has your network provider started?
  Warning  ErrorAddingLogicalPort  127m (x2 over 127m)   controlplane       addLogicalPort failed for openshift-network-diagnostics/network-check-target-gnld6: unable to parse node L3 gw annotation: k8s.ovn.org/l3-gateway-config annotation not found for node "qe-anurag114e-9xkz4-master-2.c.openshift-qe.internal"
  Normal   AddedInterface          127m                  multus             Add eth0 [10.130.0.3/23] from ovn-kubernetes
  Warning  ProbeError              9m (x16 over 71m)     kubelet            Readiness probe error: Get "http://10.130.0.3:8080/": dial tcp 10.130.0.3:8080: i/o timeout (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
body:
  Warning  ProbeError  4m (x717 over 126m)  kubelet  Readiness probe error: Get "http://10.130.0.3:8080/": context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
body:




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-25-210451

How reproducible:

rare

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Install OCP with OVNKubernetes with HO enabled

defaultNetwork:
    type: OVNKubernetes
    ovnKubernetesConfig:
      hybridOverlayConfig:
        hybridClusterNetwork: []

2.
3.

Actual results:

Installation stuck due to network-check-target issue 

Expected results:

Installation should succeed

Additional info:

Will add additional logs

 

 

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2384. The following is the description of the original issue:

Version:
$ openshift-install version
openshift-install 4.10.0-0.nightly-2021-12-23-153012
built from commit 94a3ed9cbe4db66dc50dab8b85d2abf40fb56426
release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:39cacdae6214efce10005054fb492f02d26b59fe9d23686dc17ec8a42f428534
release architecture amd64

Platform: alibabacloud

Please specify:

  • IPI (automated install with `openshift-install`. If you don't know, then it's IPI)

What happened?
Unexpected error of 'Internal publish strategy is not supported on "alibabacloud" platform', because Internal publish strategy should be supported for "alibabacloud", please clarify otherwise, thanks!

$ openshift-install create install-config --dir work
? SSH Public Key /home/jiwei/.ssh/openshift-qe.pub
? Platform alibabacloud
? Region us-east-1
? Base Domain alicloud-qe.devcluster.openshift.com
? Cluster Name jiwei-uu
? Pull Secret [? for help] *********
INFO Install-Config created in: work
$
$ vim work/install-config.yaml
$ yq e '.publish' work/install-config.yaml
Internal
$ openshift-install create cluster --dir work --log-level info
FATAL failed to fetch Metadata: failed to load asset "Install Config": invalid "install-config.yaml" file: publish: Invalid value: "Internal": Internal publish strategy is not supported on "alibabacloud" platform
$

What did you expect to happen?
"publish: Internal" should be supported for platform "alibabacloud".

How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)?
Always

Description of problem:

To address: 'Static Pod is managed but errored" err="managed container xxx does not have Resource.Requests'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

Already merged in https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator/pull/1398

 Currently controller will set status done each time it sees host that is ready in k8s without looking if it was already set.

time="2022-09-13T19:03:45Z" level=info msg="Found new ready node ocp-2.cluster1.kpsalerno.us.ibm.com with inventory id 2da64d56-5057-78c6-ea6e-bf74a783bd79, kubernetes id 2da64d56-5057-78c6-ea6e-bf74a783bd79, updating its status to Done" func="github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/src/assisted_installer_controller.(*controller).waitAndUpdateNodesStatus" file="/remote-source/app/src/assisted_installer_controller/assisted_installer_controller.go:255" request_id=6258e5a2-4e78-4148-a913-45d704a0fa1d

time="2022-09-13T19:04:05Z" level=info msg="Found new ready node ocp-2.cluster1.kpsalerno.us.ibm.com with inventory id 2da64d56-5057-78c6-ea6e-bf74a783bd79, kubernetes id 2da64d56-5057-78c6-ea6e-bf74a783bd79, updating its status to Done" func="github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/src/assisted_installer_controller.(*controller).waitAndUpdateNodesStatus" file="/remote-source/app/src/assisted_installer_controller/assisted_installer_controller.go:255" request_id=49e4e63f-cf4f-4b9f-b1f3-923c473c09dd

 

 

Description of problem:
project viewer is able to see a 'Create Pod Disruption Budget' button on Pods list page while the creation will fail finally due to less permission, in this way console should not show a 'Create Pod Disruption Budget' button for project viewer, other resources list page doesn’t have the issue

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.10.0-0.nightly-2021-09-16-212009

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. normal user has a project and workloads

  1. oc get all -n yapei1-project
    NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
    pod/example-787f749bb-czkms 1/1 Running 0 79s
    pod/example-787f749bb-m7wxt 1/1 Running 0 79s
    pod/example-787f749bb-mw8jv 1/1 Running 0 79s

NAME READY UP-TO-DATE AVAILABLE AGE
deployment.apps/example 3/3 3 3 79s

NAME DESIRED CURRENT READY AGE
replicaset.apps/example-787f749bb 3 3 3 79s

2. grant another user with view access to user project 'yapei1-project'

  1. oc adm policy add-role-to-user view uiauto1 -n yapei1-project
    clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/view added: "uiauto1"
    3. login with user 'uiauto1' and check the permissions on Pods list page

Actual results:
3. project viewer 'uiauto1' can see pods list successfully, at the same time console also shows a 'Create Pod Disruption Budget' button while the creation will finally fail if project viewer tries to create a pod

Expected results:
3. console should not show 'Create Pod Disruption Budget' button for a project viewer

Additional info:
For comparison: we doesn't show resource creation button('Create xxx' button) on other workloads list page for a project viewer, such as Deployments, DeploymentConfigs list etc

Description of problem:

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to the detail page of some Deployments with PDB connected to it
2. Click Edit PDB from the kebab menu
3. Inspect the second input box under the `Availability requirement `

Actual results: The name and aria-label attributes always show minAvailable

Expected results: They should be consistent with the first input box

Additional info:

Customers have introduced Openshift using CloudFormation in "Example 4.55. CloudFormation template for the VPC", referring to the document below.
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_container_platform/4.8/html-single/installing/index#installing-restricted-networks-aws
CloudFormation uses python3.7 with Lambda.
Since it will be the EOL of Python 3.7, what kind of effect will it have if it becomes unusable?
Is there any immediate effect? Will there be any impact when adding worker nodes?
OCP Version & Channel: 4.10
Cloud Platform: AWS

Description of problem:

failed to run command in pod with network-tools script pod-run-netns-command locally

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Client Version: 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-07-25-055755
Kustomize Version: v4.5.4
Server Version: 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419
Kubernetes Version: v1.24.0+8c7c967

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1.configure KUBECONFIG
[cloud-user@preserved-qiowang debug-scripts]$ export | grep kube
declare -x KUBECONFIG="/var/tmp/kubeconfig412"
[cloud-user@preserved-qiowang debug-scripts]$ oc get nodes
NAME                                                         STATUS   ROLES                  AGE     VERSION
qiowang-09291-chllb-master-0.c.openshift-qe.internal         Ready    control-plane,master   7h16m   v1.24.0+8c7c967
qiowang-09291-chllb-master-1.c.openshift-qe.internal         Ready    control-plane,master   7h16m   v1.24.0+8c7c967
qiowang-09291-chllb-master-2.c.openshift-qe.internal         Ready    control-plane,master   7h16m   v1.24.0+8c7c967
qiowang-09291-chllb-worker-a-2zq28.c.openshift-qe.internal   Ready    worker                 6h59m   v1.24.0+8c7c967
qiowang-09291-chllb-worker-b-226ft.c.openshift-qe.internal   Ready    worker                 6h59m   v1.24.0+8c7c967
qiowang-09291-chllb-worker-c-wq52c.c.openshift-qe.internal   Ready    worker                 6h59m   v1.24.0+8c7c967

2. clone the openshift/network-tools repo to local

3. create project test, create pod hello-world
[cloud-user@preserved-qiowang debug-scripts]$ oc project
Using project "test" on server "https://api.qiowang-09291.qe.gcp.devcluster.openshift.com:6443".
[cloud-user@preserved-qiowang debug-scripts]$ oc get pods
NAME                READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE
hello-world-j9v9g   1/1     Running   0          68s
hello-world-rrwjf   1/1     Running   0          68s

4. run ping command in the pod hello-world-j9v9g with script pod-run-netns-command locally
[cloud-user@preserved-qiowang debug-scripts]$ ./network-tools pod-run-netns-command test hello-world-j9v9g ping 8.8.8.8 -c 5
ERROR: Command returned non-zero exit code, check output or logs.

Actual results:

failed to run command in pod hello-world-j9v9g with script pod-run-netns-command locally

Expected results:

can run ping 8.8.8.8 -c 5 in pod hello-world-j9v9g with script pod-run-netns-command locally

Additional info:

 

Tracker issue for bootimage bump in 4.12. This issue should block issues which need a bootimage bump to fix.

The previous bump was OCPBUGS-1941.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4252. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem: When visiting the Terminal tab of a Node details page, an error is displayed instead of the terminal

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to the Terminal tab of a Node details page (e.g., /k8s/cluster/nodes/ip-10-0-129-13.ec2.internal/terminal)
2. Note the error alert that appears on the page instead of the terminal.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2841. The following is the description of the original issue:

Currently the agent installer supports only x86_64 arch. The image creation command must fail if some other arch is configured different from x86_64

We want to have an allowed list of architectures.

allowed = ['x86_64', 'amd64']

Description of problem:

If you set a services cluster IP to an IP with a leading zero (e.g. 192.168.0.011), ovn-k should normalise this and remove the leading zero before sending it to ovn.

This was seen by me on a CI run executing the k8 test here: test/e2e/network/funny_ips.go +75

you can reproduce using that above test.

Have a read of the text there:

 43 // What are funny IPs:  
 44 // The adjective is because of the curl blog that explains the history and the problem of liberal  
 45 // parsing of IP addresses and the consequences and security risks caused the lack of normalization,
 46 // mainly due to the use of different notations to abuse parsers misalignment to bypass filters.
 47 // xref: https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2021/04/19/curl-those-funny-ipv4-addresses/   
 48 //     
 49 // Since golang 1.17, IPv4 addresses with leading zeros are rejected by the standard library.
 50 // xref: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/30999
 51 //     
 52 // Because this change on the parsers can cause that previous valid data become invalid, Kubernetes
 53 // forked the old parsers allowing leading zeros on IPv4 address to not break the compatibility.
 54 //     
 55 // Kubernetes interprets leading zeros on IPv4 addresses as decimal, users must not rely on parser
 56 // alignment to not being impacted by the associated security advisory: CVE-2021-29923 golang
 57 // standard library "net" - Improper Input Validation of octal literals in golang 1.16.2 and below
 58 // standard library "net" results in indeterminate SSRF & RFI vulnerabilities. xref:
 59 // https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-29923                                                                                                     

northd is logging an error about this also:

|socket_util|ERR|172.30.0.011:7180: bad IP address "172.30.0.011" 
...
2022-08-23T14:14:21.968Z|01839|ovn_util|WARN|bad ip address or port for load balancer key 172.30.0.011:7180

 

Also, I see the error:

E0823 14:14:34.135115    3284 gateway_shared_intf.go:600] Failed to delete conntrack entry for service e2e-funny-ips-8626/funny-ip: failed to delete conntrack entry for service e2e-funny-ips-8626/funny-ip with svcVIP 172.30.0.011, svcPort 7180, protocol TCP: value "<nil>" passed to DeleteConntrack is not an IP address 

We should normalise the IPs before sending to OVN-k. I see also theres conntrack error when trying to set this bad IP.

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. See above k8 test

Actual results:

Leading zero IP sent to OVN

Expected results:

No leading zero IP sent to OVN

Additional info:

In 4.12.0-rc.0 some API-server components declare flowcontrol/v1beta1 release manifests:

$ oc adm release extract --to manifests quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release:4.12.0-rc.0-x86_64
$ grep -r flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io manifests
manifests/0000_50_cluster-authentication-operator_09_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_50_cluster-authentication-operator_09_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_50_cluster-authentication-operator_09_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_50_cluster-authentication-operator_09_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_20_etcd-operator_10_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_20_kube-apiserver-operator_08_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_20_kube-apiserver-operator_08_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_20_kube-apiserver-operator_08_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_50_cluster-openshift-apiserver-operator_09_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_50_cluster-openshift-apiserver-operator_09_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_50_cluster-openshift-apiserver-operator_09_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1
manifests/0000_50_cluster-openshift-controller-manager-operator_10_flowschema.yaml:apiVersion: flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1

The APIs are scheduled for removal in Kube 1.26, which will ship with OpenShift 4.13. We want the 4.12 CVO to move to modern APIs in 4.12, so the APIRemovedInNext.*ReleaseInUse alerts are not firing on 4.12. This ticket tracks removing those manifests, or replacing them with a more modern resource type, or some such. Definition of done is that new 4.13 (and with backports, 4.12) nightlies no longer include flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io/v1beta1 manifests.

This can be noticed in https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/27560/pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-ovn/1593697975584952320/artifacts/e2e-gcp-ovn/openshift-e2e-test/build-log.txt:

[It] clients should not use APIs that are removed in upcoming releases [apigroup:config.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]
  github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/apiserver/api_requests.go:27
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: api flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 254 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: api horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 10 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: api prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 22 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 224 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 22 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-kube-storage-version-migrator:kube-storage-version-migrator-sa accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 16 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: user/system:admin accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 14 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-monitoring:kube-state-metrics accessed horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling 10 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: api flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 254 times
api horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 10 times
api prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 22 times
user/system:admin accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 14 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 224 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 22 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-kube-storage-version-migrator:kube-storage-version-migrator-sa accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 16 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-monitoring:kube-state-metrics accessed horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling 10 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: api flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 254 times
api horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 10 times
api prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 22 times
user/system:admin accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 14 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 224 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 22 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-kube-storage-version-migrator:kube-storage-version-migrator-sa accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 16 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-monitoring:kube-state-metrics accessed horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling 10 times
[AfterEach] [sig-arch][Late]
  github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/util/client.go:158
[AfterEach] [sig-arch][Late]
  github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/util/client.go:159
flake: api flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 254 times
api horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 10 times
api prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 22 times
user/system:admin accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 14 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 224 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 22 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-kube-storage-version-migrator:kube-storage-version-migrator-sa accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 16 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-monitoring:kube-state-metrics accessed horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling 10 times
Ginkgo exit error 4: exit with code 4

This is required to unblock https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/27561

Description of problem:

When user selects a installed operator (for example, openshift elastic search) in operator hub and navigating to installed operator page from operator information page

with the help of "view it here" option, "404 Not found" information has wrongly shown/appeared although it navigates to the installed operator at the end.

 

Version-Release number of selected components (if applicable):
4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-15-150248
How reproducible:

 Always

 

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Login to OCP web console.
  2. Install Operator, For example,OpenShift Elasticsearch Operator- production operators if missing.
  3. Go to the Operator hub and  search for OpenShift Elasticsearch Operator. (make sure Project filter sets to 'All projects')
  4. Click on OpenShift Elasticsearch Operator- production operators.
  5. Click on the link "View it here" from the installed operator section.
  6. View the behavior.

Actual results:

Wrong message "404: Not found" while the user selects an installed operator and navigates from operator hub to installed operator page.

 

Browser console log indicate as below

main-chunk-525818b154a57a9b220a.min.js:1 unhandled error: Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'firstElementChild') TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'firstElementChild')
    at c (https://console-openshift-console.apps.jmekkatt-dob.ibmcloud.qe.devcluster.openshift.com/static/vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:118:125992)
    at HTMLDivElement.l (https://console-openshift-console.apps.jmekkatt-dob.ibmcloud.qe.devcluster.openshift.com/static/vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:118:126387) TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'firstElementChild')
    at c (vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:72303:1)
    at HTMLDivElement.l (vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:72303:1)
window.onerror @ main-chunk-525818b154a57a9b220a.min.js:1
vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:72303 Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'firstElementChild')
    at c (vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:72303:1)
    at HTMLDivElement.l (vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:72303:1)
c @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:72303
l @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:72303
scroll (async)
componentWillUnmount @ vendor-patternfly-core-chunk-006bb1499791fa7cfea7.min.js:38397
hs @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
bs @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
hs @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
bs @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
Oc @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
t.unstable_runWithPriority @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171690
Hi @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
Ac @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
pc @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
(anonymous) @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
t.unstable_runWithPriority @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171690
Hi @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
Vi @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
qi @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
De @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
Yt @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
main-chunk-525818b154a57a9b220a.min.js:1          GET https://console-openshift-console.apps.jmekkatt-dob.ibmcloud.qe.devcluster.openshift.com/api/kubernetes/apis/operators.coreos.com/v1alpha1/clusterserviceversions/elasticsearch-operator.5.5.0 404 (Not Found)
  

Expected results:

Installed operator details should show without any error when the user selects an installed operator and navigates from operator hub to installed operator page.

 

Additional info:

Reproduced in both chrome[103.0.5060.114 (Official Build) (64-bit)] and firefox[91.11.0esr (64-bit)] browsers

Attached screen share for the same issue InstalledOperatorNavigation404.mp4

Description of problem: The product name for Azure Red Hat OpenShift was incorrect in Customer Case Management (CCM). As a result, the console included this incorrect product name in order for the support case link to correctly route. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CPCCM-9926 fixed the incorrect product name, so now the support case link for Azure needs to be updated to reflect the correct product name.

Description of problem:

We have been investigating an issue with slow kube-apiserver rollout times. When a new revision is created, the current static pod is deleted and a new one created to pick up the revision. There is a 5 min timer on the creation, if this timeout is exceeded the rollout will revert to the previous revision.

The customer has been seeing failed rollouts due to this 5 min timer being exceeded. There is load on the platform cpus with the biggest contributor being exec probe overhead, but there is still significant idle ~ 50%.

While not able to reproduce to the same degree as the customer, I was able to reproduce slow rollout times with a similar platform cpu overhead.

From the logs, we see slow container creation times.

I added some instrumentation to the low_latency_hooks.sh script

snip
pid=$(jq '.pid' /dev/stdin 2>&1)
logger "Start low_latency_hooks ${pid}"
[[ $? -eq 0 && -n "${pid}" ]] || { logger "${0}: Failed to extract the pid: ${pid}"; exit 0; }
snip
if [ "${mode}" = "ro" ]; then
ip netns exec "${ns}" mount -o remount,ro /sys
[ $? -eq 0 ] || exit 1 # Error out so the pod will not start with a writable /sys
fi
logger "Stop low_latency_hooks ${pid}"

Analysing the logs for the five running containers in the apiserver we see that the bulk of the time is being spent in the hook.

insecure-readyz
total container create time: 35s
hook time: 29s

cert-syncer
total container create time: 41s
hook time: 32s

cert-regeneration-controller
total container create time: 73s
hook time: 54s

kube-apiserver
total container create time: 18s
hook time: 16s

check-endpoints
total container create time: 31s
hook time: 31s

I ran another test where I removed the oci hook and kept everything else the same, the results were dramatically different.

Container create times:
insecure-readyz - 1s
cert-syncer - 1s
cert-regeneration-controller - 1s
kube-apiserver -1s
check-endpoints - 5s

I was then able to run the same test in the customers lab. In some joint testing we did with the customer we originally saw 4-5 mins for a rollout. Without the hook in the exact same environment, the total rollout time dropped to <=2 mins.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.9.37
Issue likely in later releases as well, have not timed yet

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Force a rollout with a platform cpu load representative of the application
2.
3.

Actual results:
Slow rollout times sometimes exceeding the timeout

Expected results:
Rollout should fit into the timeout window

Additional info:

Description of problem:

KafkSink current desctiption in odc is `Kafka Sink is Addressable, it receives events and send them to a Kafka topic.` and this should be `A KafkaSink takes a CloudEvent, and sends it to an Apache Kafka Topic.  Events can be specified in either Structured or Binary mode.` as provided by Serverless team

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install Serverless operator
2. Create CR for knativeKafka in knative-eventing ns
3. go to dev perspective -> add -> event sink
4. Check the description of kafka sink

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

Update the description to as provided by serverless team

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

some upgrade ci jobs from 4.11.z to 4.12 nightly build are failed, because system unit machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container is failed

e.g. job https://qe-private-deck-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/view/gs/qe-private-deck/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-openshift-tests-private-release-4.12-nightly-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-aws-ipi-proxy-p1/1579169944476585984

omg get mcp
NAME    CONFIG                                            UPDATED  UPDATING  DEGRADED  MACHINECOUNT  READYMACHINECOUNT  UPDATEDMACHINECOUNT  DEGRADEDMACHINECOUNT  AGE
worker  rendered-worker-6e18de1272fad7a5ca1529941e3ceaed  False    True      True      3             0                  0                    1                     3h53m
master  rendered-master-60f4ff5893c94f53acd9ebb7a6bf53d4  False    True      True      3             0                  0                    1                     3h53m 

check issued node

omg get node/ip-10-0-57-74.us-east-2.compute.internal -o yaml|yq -y '.metadata.annotations'
cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig: '[{"interface":"eni-0f6de21569b5b65c8","ifaddr":{"ipv4":"10.0.48.0/20"},"capacity":{"ipv4":14,"ipv6":15}}]'
csi.volume.kubernetes.io/nodeid: '{"ebs.csi.aws.com":"i-01a34f6b5f2cd1e41"}'
machine.openshift.io/machine: openshift-machine-api/ci-op-kb95kxx9-2a438-r6z94-master-2
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/controlPlaneTopology: HighlyAvailable
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/currentConfig: rendered-master-065664319cfbaee64277097d49a8a5a6
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/desiredConfig: rendered-master-60f4ff5893c94f53acd9ebb7a6bf53d4
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/desiredDrain: drain-rendered-master-60f4ff5893c94f53acd9ebb7a6bf53d4
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/lastAppliedDrain: drain-rendered-master-60f4ff5893c94f53acd9ebb7a6bf53d4
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/reason: 'error running systemd-run --unit machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container
  --collect --wait -- podman run --authfile /var/lib/kubelet/config.json --privileged
  --pid=host --net=host --rm -v /:/run/host quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:0daf5c4a35424410e88dde102022fc3581302bc8a98e09e2e4748502c59b3661
  rpm-ostree ex deploy-from-self /run/host: Running as unit: machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container.service


  Finished with result: exit-code


  Main processes terminated with: code=exited/status=125


  Service runtime: 2min 52ms


  CPU time consumed: 144ms


  : exit status 125'
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/state: Degraded
volumes.kubernetes.io/controller-managed-attach-detach: 'true' 

check mcd log on issued node

omg get pod -n openshift-machine-config-operator  -o json | jq -r '.items[]|select(.spec.nodeName=="ip-10-0-57-74.us-east-2.compute.internal")|.metadata.name' | grep daemon
machine-config-daemon-znbvf

2022-10-09T22:12:58.797891917Z I1009 22:12:58.797821  179598 update.go:1917] Updating OS to layered image quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:0daf5c4a35424410e88dde102022fc3581302bc8a98e09e2e4748502c59b3661
2022-10-09T22:12:58.797891917Z I1009 22:12:58.797846  179598 rpm-ostree.go:447] Running captured: rpm-ostree --version
2022-10-09T22:12:58.815829171Z I1009 22:12:58.815800  179598 update.go:2068] rpm-ostree is not new enough for layering; forcing an update via container
2022-10-09T22:12:58.817577513Z I1009 22:12:58.817555  179598 update.go:2053] Running: systemd-run --unit machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container --collect --wait -- podman run --authfile /var/lib/kubelet/config.json --privileged --pid=host --net=host --rm -v /:/run/host quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:0daf5c4a35424410e88dde102022fc3581302bc8a98e09e2e4748502c59b3661 rpm-ostree ex deploy-from-self /run/host 
...
2022-10-09T22:15:00.831959313Z E1009 22:15:00.831949  179598 writer.go:200] Marking Degraded due to: error running systemd-run --unit machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container --collect --wait -- podman run --authfile /var/lib/kubelet/config.json --privileged --pid=host --net=host --rm -v /:/run/host quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:0daf5c4a35424410e88dde102022fc3581302bc8a98e09e2e4748502c59b3661 rpm-ostree ex deploy-from-self /run/host: Running as unit: machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container.service
2022-10-09T22:15:00.831959313Z Finished with result: exit-code
2022-10-09T22:15:00.831959313Z Main processes terminated with: code=exited/status=125
2022-10-09T22:15:00.831959313Z Service runtime: 2min 52ms
2022-10-09T22:15:00.831959313Z CPU time consumed: 144ms
2022-10-09T22:15:00.831959313Z : exit status 125

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

Steps to Reproduce:

upgrade cluster from 4.11.8 to 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-05-053337  

Actual results:

upgrade is failed due to node is degraded, rpm-ostree update via container is failed

Expected results:

upgrade can be completed successfully

Additional info:

must-gather: https://gcsweb-qe-private-deck-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/qe-private-deck/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-openshift-tests-private-release-4.12-nightly-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-aws-ipi-proxy-p1/1579169944476585984/artifacts/aws-ipi-proxy-p1/gather-must-gather/artifacts/must-gather.tar

Other build logs of failed jobs

https://gcsweb-qe-private-deck-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/qe-private-deck/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-openshift-tests-private-release-4.12-nightly-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-aws-ipi-proxy-cco-manual-security-token-service-p1/1579200140067999744/build-log.txt

https://gcsweb-qe-private-deck-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/qe-private-deck/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-openshift-tests-private-release-4.12-nightly-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-azure-ipi-proxy-p1/1579094436883730432/build-log.txt

https://gcsweb-qe-private-deck-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/qe-private-deck/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-openshift-tests-private-release-4.12-nightly-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-azure-ipi-proxy-workers-rhcos-rhel8-p2/1578747158293647360/build-log.txt

Description of problem:

Git icon shown in the repository details page should be based on the git provider.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a Repository with gitlab repo url
2. Navigate to the detail page.

Actual results:

github icon is displayed for the gitlab url.

Expected results:

gitlab icon should be displayed for the gitlab url.

Additional info:

use `GitLabIcon` and `BitBucketIcon` from patternfly react-icons.

Description of problem:

vSphere privilege checking failing when providing user-defined folder and/or resource pool

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-30-054458

How reproducible:

consistently

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Provide pre-existing folder and/or resource pool to the install-config
2. Perform an installation with an account with read only privileges on the datacenter and cluster
3. The installer will fail with missing privileges for the cluster and datacenter.  When a pre-existing folder and resource pool are defined, the account can hold read only privileges on the datacenter and cluster .

Actual results:

Installer reports missing privileges

Expected results:

Installer should succeed

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

Alert actions are not triggering modal from where storage cluster can be expanded.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

1/1

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Fill up a storage cluster to 80%
2. Alert is seen in cluster dashboard.
3. Click the Add Capacity button

Actual results:

Modal is not launched.

Expected results:

Modal should be launched.

Additional info:

 

Both `[sig-devex][Feature:ImageEcosystem][mysql][Slow] openshift mysql image Creating from a template should instantiate the template [apigroup:apps.openshift.io]` and `[sig-devex][Feature:ImageEcosystem][mariadb][Slow] openshift mariadb image Creating from a template should instantiate the template [apigroup:image.openshift.io][apigroup:operator.openshift.io][apigroup:config.openshift.io][apigroup:apps.openshift.io]` are repeatedly failing over multiple PRs.

More links in https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/27502#issuecomment-1304613482

Opening this issue to temporarily skip the broken tests to unblocking merging PRs in openshift/origin:master

More details in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-3339