Problem:

Certain Insights Advisor features differentiate between RHEL and OCP advisor

Goal:

Address top priority UI misalignments between RHEL and OCP advisor. Address UI features dropped from Insights ADvisor for OCP GA.

Scope:

Specific tasks and priority of them tracked in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CCXDEV-7432

Managing PVs at scale for a fleet creates difficulties where "one size does not fit all". The ability for SRE to deploy prometheus with PVs and have retention based an on a desired size would enable easier management of these volumes across the fleet. 

The prometheus-operator exposes retentionSize.

This is a feature request to enable this configuration option via CMO cluster-monitoring-config ConfigMap.

cc Simon Pasquier  

Problem Alignment

The Problem

Today, all configuration for setting individual, for example, routing configuration is done via a single configuration file that only admins have access to. If an environment uses multiple tenants and each tenant, for example, has different systems that they are using to notify teams in case of an issue, then someone needs to file a request w/ an admin to add the required settings.

That can be bothersome for individual teams, since requests like that usually disappear in the backlog of an administrator. At the same time, administrators might get tons of requests that they have to look at and prioritize, which takes them away from more crucial work.

We would like to introduce a more self service approach whereas individual teams can create their own configuration for their needs w/o the administrators involvement.

Last but not least, since Monitoring is deployed as a Core service of OpenShift there are multiple restrictions that the SRE team has to apply to all OSD and ROSA clusters. One restriction is the ability for customers to use the central Alertmanager that is owned and managed by the SRE team. They can't give access to the central managed secret due to security concerns so that users can add their own routing information.

High-Level Approach

Provide a new API (based on the Operator CRD approach) as part of the Prometheus Operator that allows creating a subset of the Alertmanager configuration without touching the central Alertmanager configuration file.

Please note that we do not plan to support additional individual webhooks with this work. Customers will need to deploy their own version of the third party webhooks.

Goal & Success

• Allow users to deploy individual configurations that allow setting up Alertmanager for their needs without an administrator.

Solution Alignment

Key Capabilities

• As an OpenShift administrator, I want to control who can CRUD individual configuration so that I can make sure that any unknown third person can touch the central Alertmanager instance shipped within OpenShift Monitoring.
• As a team owner, I want to deploy a routing configuration to push notifications for alerts to my system of choice.

Key Flows

Team A wants to send all their important notifications to a specific Slack channel.

• Administrator gives permission to Team A to allow creating a new configuration CR in their individual namespace.
• Team A creates a new configuration CR.
• Team A configures what alerts should go into their Slack channel.
• Open Questions & Key Decisions (optional)
• Do we want to improve anything inside the developer console to allow configuration?

Copy/paste from [_https://github.com/openshift-cs/managed-openshift/issues/60_]

Which service is this feature request for?
OpenShift Dedicated and Red Hat OpenShift Service on AWS

What are you trying to do?
Allow ROSA/OSD to integrate with AWS Managed Prometheus.

Describe the solution you'd like
Remote-write of metrics is supported in OpenShift but it does not work with AWS Managed Prometheus since AWS Managed Prometheus requires AWS SigV4 auth.

• Note that Prometheus supports AWS SigV4 since v2.26 and OpenShift 4.9 uses v2.29.

Describe alternatives you've considered
There is the workaround to use the "AWS SigV4 Proxy" but I'd think this is not properly supported by RH.
https://mobb.ninja/docs/rosa/cluster-metrics-to-aws-prometheus/

Additional context
The customer wants to use an open and portable solution to centralize metrics storage and analysis. If they also deploy to other clouds, they don't want to have to re-configure. Since most clouds offer a Prometheus service (or it's easy to self-manage Prometheus), app migration should be simplified.

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.

Feature Overview.

Early customer feedback is that they see SNO as a great solution covering smaller footprint deployment, but are wondering what is the evolution story OpenShift is going to provide where more capacity or high availability are needed in the future.

While migration tooling (moving workload/config to new cluster) could be a mid-term solution, customer desire is not to include extra hardware to be involved in this process.

 For Telecommunications Providers, at the Far Edge they intend to start small and then grow. Many of these operators will start with a SNO-based DU deployment as an initial investment, but as DUs evolve, different segments of the radio spectrum are added, various radio hardware is provisioned and features delivered to the Far Edge, the Telecommunication Providers desire the ability for their Far Edge deployments to scale up from 1 node to 2 nodes to n nodes. On the opposite side of the spectrum from SNO is MMIMO where there is a robust cluster and workloads use HPA.

Goals

• Provide the capability to expand a single replica control plane topology to host more workloads capacity - add worker
• Provide the capability to expand a single replica control plane to be a highly available control plane
• To satisfy MMIMO Telecommunications providers will want the ability to scale a SNO to a multi-node cluster that can support HPA.
• Telecommunications providers do not want workload (DU specifically) downtime when migrating from SNO to a multi-node cluster.
• Telecommunications providers wish to be able to scale from one to two or more nodes to support a variety of radio hardware.
• Support CP scaling (CP HA) for 2 node cluster, 3 node cluster and n node cluster. As the number of nodes in the cluster increases so does the failure domain of the cluster. The cluster is now supporting more cell sectors and therefore has more of a need for HA and resiliency including the cluster CP.

Requirements

• TBD

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section:

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Feature Overview

• As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.

• As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

• Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

• Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
• Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
• Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
• Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
• In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
• For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
• Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
• The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
• The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

• As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
• As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
• As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
• As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
• As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

• As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
• As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

• This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

References

• Bootable Ephemeral Installer Image for Disconnected Cluster 0 Deployments

Feature Overview

The AWS-specific code added in OCPPLAN-6006 needs to become GA and with this we want to introduce a couple of Day2 improvements.
Currently the AWS tags are defined and applied at installation time only and saved in the infrastructure CRD's status field for further operator use, which in turn just add the tags during creation.

Saving in the status field means it's not included in Velero backups, which is a crucial feature for customers and Day2.
Thus the status.resourceTags field should be deprecated in favour of a newly created spec.resourceTags with the same content. The installer should only populate the spec, consumers of the infrastructure CRD must favour the spec over the status definition if both are supplied, otherwise the status should be honored and a warning shall be issued.

Being part of the spec, the behaviour should also tag existing resources that do not have the tags yet and once the tags in the infrastructure CRD are changed all the AWS resources should be updated accordingly.

On AWS this can be done without re-creating any resources (the behaviour is basically an upsert by tag key) and is possible without service interruption as it is a metadata operation.

Tag deletes continue to be out of scope, as the customer can still have custom tags applied to the resources that we do not want to delete.

Due to the ongoing intree/out of tree split on the cloud and CSI providers, this should not apply to clusters with intree providers (!= "external").

Once confident we have all components updated, we should introduce an end2end test that makes sure we never create resources that are untagged.

After that, we can remove the experimental flag and make this a GA feature.

Goals

• Inclusion in the cluster backups
• Flexibility of changing tags during cluster lifetime, without recreating the whole cluster

Requirements

• This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

List any affected packages or components.

• Installer
• Cluster Infrastructure
• Storage
• Node
• NetworkEdge
• Internal Registry
• CCO

Feature Overview  

Much like core OpenShift operators, a standardized flow exists for OLM-managed operators to interact with the cluster in a specific way to leverage AWS STS authorization when using AWS APIs as opposed to insecure static, long-lived credentials. OLM-managed operators can implement integration with the CloudCredentialOperator in well-defined way to support this flow.

Goals:

Enable customers to easily leverage OpenShift's capabilities around AWS STS with layered products, for increased security posture. Enable OLM-managed operators to implement support for this in well-defined pattern.

Requirements:

• CCO gets a new mode in which it can reconcile STS credential request for OLM-managed operators
• A standardized flow is leveraged to guide users in discovering and preparing their AWS IAM policies and roles with permissions that are required for OLM-managed operators 
• A standardized flow is defined in which users can configure OLM-managed operators to leverage AWS STS
• An example operator is used to demonstrate the end2end functionality
• Clear instructions and documentation for operator development teams to implement the required interaction with the CloudCredentialOperator to support this flow

Use Cases:

See Operators & STS slide deck.

Out of Scope:

• handling OLM-managed operator updates in which AWS IAM permission requirements might change from one version to another (which requires user awareness and intervention)

Background:

The CloudCredentialsOperator already provides a powerful API for OpenShift's cluster core operator to request credentials and acquire them via short-lived tokens. This capability should be expanded to OLM-managed operators, specifically to Red Hat layered products that interact with AWS APIs. The process today is cumbersome to none-existent based on the operator in question and seen as an adoption blocker of OpenShift on AWS.

Customer Considerations

This is particularly important for ROSA customers. Customers are expected to be asked to pre-create the required IAM roles outside of OpenShift, which is deemed acceptable.

Documentation Considerations

• Internal documentation needs to exists to guide Red Hat operator developer teams on the requirements and proposed implementation of integration with CCO and the proposed flow
• External documentation needs to exist to guide users on:
  • how to become aware that the cluster is in STS mode
  • how to become aware of operators that support STS and the proposed CCO flow
  • how to become aware of the IAM permissions requirements of these operators
  • how to configure an operator in the proposed flow to interact with CCO

Interoperability Considerations

• this needs to work with ROSA
• this needs to work with self-managed OCP on AWS

Feature Overview

Customers are asking for improvements to the upgrade experience (both over-the-air and disconnected). This is a feature tracking epics required to get that work done.  

Goals

1. Have an option to do upgrades in more discrete steps under admin control. Specifically, these steps are: 
   • Control plane upgrade
   • Worker nodes upgrade
   • Workload enabling upgrade (i..e. Router, other components) or infra nodes
2. Better visibility into any errors during the upgrades and documentation of what they error means and how to recover. 
3. An user experience around an end-2-end back-up and restore after a failed upgrade 
4. OTA-810  - Better Documentation: 
   • Backup procedures before upgrades. 
   • More control over worker upgrades (with tagged pools between user Vs admin)
   • The kinds of pre-upgrade tests that are run, the errors that are flagged and what they mean and how to address them. 
   • Better explanation of each discrete step in upgrades, and what each CVO Operator is doing and potential errors, troubleshooting and mitigating actions.

References

• OpenShift Upgrades Customer Issues Discussion -6/22/2023
• Select Customer Experiences and Feedback on Upgrades

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.
<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Feature --->
<--- Remove the descriptive text as appropriate --->

Feature Overview

• As RH OpenShift Product Owners, we want to enable new providers/platforms/service with varying levels of capabilities and integration with minimal reliance on OpenShift Engineering.
• As a new provider/platform partner, I want to enable my solution (hardware and/or software) with OpenShift with minimal effort.

Problem

• It is currently challenging for us to enable new platforms / providers without taking the heavy burden on doing the platform specific development ourselves.

Goals

• We want to enable the long-tail new platforms/providers to expand our reach into new markets and/or support new use cases.
• We want to remove strict dependencies we have on Engineering teams to review, support and test new providers.
• We want to lower the effort required for onboarding new platforms/providers.
• We want to enable new platform/providers to self-certify.
• We want to define tiered model for provider/platform integration that delineates ownership and responsibilities throughout new provider/platform development lifecycle and support model.
• We want to reduce time to onboard new provider/platform – ideally to a single release.
• We want to maintain consistent customer experience across all providers/platforms.

Requirements

• Step-by-step guide on how to add a new platform/provider for each tier
• Certification tool for partner to self-certify
• Certification tool results for (at least) each Y/minor release submitted by partner to Red Hat for acknowledgement
• DCI program to enable partners to run CI with OpenShift on their platform
• Well documented, accessible, and up-to-date test suites for providing the test coverage of the partner
• CI includes upgrade testing of OpenShift with partner's components
• Partner component upgrade failure should not block OpenShift upgrade
• Partner code is available in repositories in the openshift org on github with an open source license compatible with OpenShift

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section:

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

References

• [ Notes - OpenShift Everywhere - Onboarding new providers/platforms|https://www.google.com/url?q=[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M1zLG2-wmkeCWTS8omN5G8vsDKvDeZfmegsi7cCVh-U/edit?usp%3Dsharing&sa=D&source=calendar&ust=1641920246517943&usg=AOvVaw2ZIl_XuE7OsSr4wCmRjOp3]] 
• OKD Installer Architecture Brainstorming Working Group Meeting Minutes
• New-Platform Documentation Working Group Meeting Minutes

Goal

Increase integration of Shipwright, Tekton, Argo CD in OpenShift GitOps with OpenShift platform and related products such as ACM.

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

• Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
• Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

• Core Networking Stability
• Core Networking Performance and Scale
• Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
• Core Networking UX (Observability)
• Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

• Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
• SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
• Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

• CNV
• Service Mesh
• CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.

Relevant links:

• Documentation:
  • Edge Diagnostics Scratchpad, our team's internal diagnostic guide.
  • Troubleshooting OCP networking issues - The complete guide, the SDN team's diagnostic guide.
  • Linux Performance, Brendan Gregg's guide to analyzing Linux performance issues.
  • RFC: A proper feedback loop on Alerts.
  • OpenShift Router Reload Technical Overview on Access.
  • Performance Scaling HAProxy with OpenShift on Access.
  • How to collect worker metrics to troubleshoot CPU load, memory pressure and interrupt issues and networking on worker nodes in OCP 4 on Access.
  • OpenShift Performance and Scale Knowledge Base on Mojo, results from OpenShift scalability testing.
  • Scalability and performance, OCP 4.5 documentation about the router's currently known scalability limits.
  • Scaling OpenShift Container Platform HAProxy Router, OCP 3.11 documentation about the manual performance configuration that was possible in OCP 3.
  • Timing web requests with cURL and Chrome from the Cloudflare blog.
  • tcpdump advanced filters, some useful tcpdump commands.
  • OpenShift SDN - Networking, OCP 3.11 documentation on the SDN (useful background reading).
  • Ingress Operator and Controller Status Conditions, design document for improved status condition reporting.
  • Observability tips for HAProxy, a slide deck by Willy Tarreau.
  • Interesting Traces - Out of Order versus Retransmissions, analysis using tshark.
  • The PCP Book: A Complete Documentation of Performance Co-Pilot, by Yogesh Babar.
  • Debugging kernel networking bug, brief guide to using SystemTap on RHCOS.
  • Troubleshooting throughput issues from the OCP 4.5 documentation.
  • Troubleshooting OpenShift Clusters and Workloads.
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux Network Performance Tuning Guide (PDF).
  • openshift/enhancements#289 stability: point to point network check, a diagnostic built into the kube-apiserver operator.
• Diagnostic tools:
  • dropwatch to watch for packet drops.
  • ethtool to check NIC configuration.
  • iovisor/bcc: BCC - Tools for BPF-based Linux IO analysis, networking, monitoring, and more to trace and diagnose various issues in the networking stack.
  • r-curler to gather timing information about HTTP/HTTPS connections.
  • route-monitor, to monitor routes for reachability.
  • hping(3), a programmable packet generator.
  • OpenTracing / Jaeger in OpenShift.
  • node-problem-detector, a possible integration point for new diagnostics.
  • Using SystemTap by Brendan Gregg.
  • DTrace SystemTap cheatsheet (PDF).
• Visualization and more sophisticated diagnostic tools:
  • eldadru/ksniff, kubectl plugin for tcpdump & Wireshark.
  • ironcladlou/ditm, Dan's "Dan in the Middle" tool.
  • Skydive, network diagnostic and visualization tool.
  • ali, a "load testing tool capable of performing real-time analysis" with visualization.
• Testing tools:
  • stress-ng, a general stress-loading tool (CPU, filesystem, network, ...).
  • mb, the networking benchmarking tool written and used by Jiri Mencak from our Perf+Scale team.
• Case studies:
  • BZ1763206 is an example of diagnosing DNS latency/timeouts.
  • BZ1829779 Investigation details the diagnosis of route latency.
  • BZ1845545 is an example of diagnosing misconfigured DNS for an external LB.
  • Debugging network stalls on Kubernetes, from the GitHub Blog, about diagnosing Kubernetes performance issues related to ksoftirqd.

Feature Overview

• This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary

• Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

Goals

• This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature

• …

Requirements

• This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories

• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories

• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?

• Does this feature have doc impact?  

• New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact

• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.

• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?

• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?

• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?

• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.

• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Feature Overview

Enable sharing ConfigMap and Secret across namespaces

Requirements

Questions to answer…

NA

Out of Scope

NA

Background, and strategic fit

Consumption of RHEL entitlements has been a challenge on OCP 4 since it moved to a cluster-based entitlement model compared to the node-based (RHEL subscription manager) entitlement mode. In order to provide a sufficiently similar experience to OCP 3, the entitlement certificates that are made available on the cluster (OCPBU-93) should be shared across namespaces in order to prevent the need for cluster admin to copy these entitlements in each namespace which leads to additional operational challenges for updating and refreshing them. 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:
 * What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
 * Does this feature have doc impact?
 * New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
 * If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
 * What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
 * How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
 * What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
 * Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
 * What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Summary (PM+lead)

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AUTH-2 revealed that, in prinicipal, Pod Security Admission is possible to integrate into OpenShift while retaining SCC functionality.

This epic is about the concrete steps to enable Pod Security Admission by default in OpenShift

Motivation (PM+lead)

Goals (lead)

• Enable Pod Security Admission in "restricted" policy level by default
• Migrate existing core workloads to comply to the "restricted" pod security policy level

Non-Goals (lead)

• Other OpenShift workloads must be migrated by the individual responsible teams.

Deliverables

Proposal (lead)

Enhancement - https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1010

User Stories (PM)

Dependencies (internal and external, lead)

Previous Work (lead)

Open questions (lead)

1. ...

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-authentication-operator/pull/570
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator/pull/120
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-samples-operator/pull/425

Epic Goal

HyperShift provisions OpenShift clusters with externally managed control-planes. It follows a slightly different process for provisioning clusters. For example, HyperShift uses cluster API as a backend and moves all the machine management bits to the management cluster.  

Why is this important?

showing machine management/cluster auto-scaling tabs in the console is likely to confuse users and cause unnecessary side effects. 

Definition of Done

• MachineConfig and MachineConfigPool should not be present, they should be either removed or hidden when the cluster is spawned using HyperShift. 
• Cluster Settings show say the control plane is externally managed and be read-only.
• Cluster Settings -> Configuration resources should be read-only, maybe hide the tab
• Some resources should go in an allowlist. Most will be hidden
• Review getting started steps

See Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k76JtRRHBdCCEjHPqKcYvbNVsuaGmRhWDLESWIm0mbo/edit#

Setup / Testing

It's based on the SERVER_FLAG controlPlaneTopology being set to External is really the driving factor here; this can be done in one of two ways:

• Locally via a Bridge Variable, export BRIDGE_CONTROL_PLANE_TOPOLOGY_MODE="External"
• Locally / OnCluster via modifying the window.SERVER_FLAGS.controlPlaneTopology to External in the dev tools

To test work related to cluster upgrade process, use a 4.10.3 cluster set on the candidate-4.10 upgrade channel using 4.11 frontend code.

Epic Goal

• Ensure that OCP Admin console can enable dark mode
• Mechanism for switching between light/dark mode, based on user preferences or User Settings in OCP
• Identify changes needed for OCP console's dynamic plugins
• Status as we work through the stories: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18ib0A9ZtSYo1e2aOtM2LtZcsNFs1aRCHXx6NAPsIAso/edit#

Why is this important?

• So the UX satisfies the current trands, where dark mode is becoming a standard for modern services.  

Acceptance Criteria

• OCP admin console must be rendered in a preferred mode based on `prefers-color-scheme` media query
• OCP admin console must be rendered in a preferred mode selected in the User Setting page
• Create an followup epic/story for and listing and tracking changes needed in OCP console's dynamic plugins

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. PatternFly - Dark mode PF variables

Previous Work (Optional):

1. Mike Coker has worked on a POC from the PF point of view on both the admin and dev console, and the screenshot results are listed below along with the repo branch. Also listed is a document covering some of the common issues found when putting together the admin console POC. https://github.com/mcoker/console/tree/dark-theme
   Background POC work completed for reference:

PatternFly Dark Theme Handbook: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mRYEfUoOjTsSt7hiqjbeplqhfo3_rVDO0QqMj2p67pw/edit

Admin Console -> Workloads & Pods

• Screenshots: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BoOpXpX96_uNUhVJiEqGUCZ-JMYh1A78fXJhk3H86K8/edit#slide=id.p
• Github branch: https://github.com/mcoker/console/tree/dark-theme
• Github PR for Dark Theme WIP by Vikram: https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/10947{}

Dev Console -> Gotcha pages: Observe Dashboard and Metrics, Add, Pipelines: builder, list, log, and run

• Screenshots: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/13jagAf_JEu82hd_KpEHRmj25xCEqwImWpNufzVopuUs/edit#slide=id.p
• Github branch: https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/10815
• Evaluation: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fBCPPb4Z1sqUDKgQkpueGe8VQZo4pBUA9PV4vnFCnDw/edit#gid=0

Open questions::

1. Who should be responsible for updating DynamicPlugins to be able to render in dark mode?

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

• Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

Goal

• Add the ability for users to select supported but not recommended updates.
• Refine workflow when both "upgradeable=false" and "supported-but-not-recommended" updates occur

Background
RFE: for 4.10, Cincinnati and the cluster-version operator are adding conditional updates (a.k.a. targeted edge blocking): https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OTA-267

High-level plans in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#update-client-support-for-the-enhanced-schema

Example of what the oc adm upgrade UX will be in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#cluster-administrator.

The oc implementation landed via https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/961.

Design

• Use case 01: "supported but not recommended" occurs to the latest version:
  • Add an info icon next to the version on update path with a pop-over to explain about why updating to this version is supported, but not recommended and a link to known risks
  • Identify the difference in "recommended" versions, "supported but not recommended" versions, and "blocked" versions (upgradeable=false) in the + more modal.
  • The latest version is pre-selected in the dropdown in the update modal with an inline alert to inform users about supported-but-not-recommended version with link to known risks. Users can choose to update to another recommended versions, update to a supported-but-not-recommended one, or wait.
  • The "recommended" and "supported but not recommended" updates are separated in the dropdown.
  • If a user selects a "recommended" update, the inline alert disappears.
• Use case 02: When both "upgradeable=false" and "supported but not recommended" occur:
  • Add an alert banner to explain why users shouldn’t update to the latest version and link to how to resolve on the cluster settings details page. Users have the options to resolve the issue, update to a patch version, or wait.
  • If users open the update modal without resolving the "upgradeable=false" issue, the next recommended version is pre-selected. An expandable link "View blocked versions (#)" is included under the dropdown to show "upgradeable=false" versions with resolve link.
  • If users resolve the "upgradeable=false" issue, the cluster settings page will change to use case 01

• • Question: Priority on changing the upgradeable=false alert banner in update modal and blocked versions in dropdown

See design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Nja4whdsI5dKmQNS_rXyN8IGtRXDJ8gXuU_eSxBLMIY/edit#

See marvel: https://marvelapp.com/prototype/h3ehaa4/screen/86077932

Epic Goal

• Add telemetry so that we know how image stream features are used.

Why is this important?

• We have a long standing epic to create image streams v2. We need to better understand how image streams are used today.

Scenarios

1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

1. …

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Epic Goal

• Make the image registry distributed across availability zones.

Why is this important?

• The registry should be highly available and zone failsafe.

Scenarios

1. As an administrator I want to rely on a default configuration that spreads image registry pods across topology zones so that I don't suffer from a long recovery time (>6 mins) in case of a complete zone failure if all pods are impacted.

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Pod's topologySpreadConstraints

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-image-registry-operator/pull/730
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Goal

Remove Jenkins from the OCP Payload.

Problem

• Jenkins images are "non-trival in size, impact experience around OCP payloads
• Security advisories cannot be handled once, but against all actively supported OCP releases, adding to response time for handling said advisories
• Some customers may now want to upgrade Jenkins as OCP upgrades (making this configurable is more ideal)

Why is this important

• This is an engineering motivated item to reduce costs so we have more cycles for strategic work
• Aside from the team itself, top level OCP architects want this to reduce the image size, improve general OCP upgrade experience
• Sends a mix message with respect to what is startegic CI/CI when Jenkins is baked into OCP, but Tekton/Pipelines is an add-on, day 2 install sort of thing

Dependencies (internal and external)

See epic linking - need alternative non payload image available to provide relatively seamless migration

Also, the EP for this is approved and merged at https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/builds/remove-jenkins-payload.md

Estimate (xs, s, m, l, xl, xxl):

Questions:

• in addition to needing the CPaaS Image available first, have we confirmed the "deprecate first, then remove" requirements?  Per grooming we've assigned Rob Gormley the task https://issues.redhat.com/browse/JKNS-274 for tracking this down.  I will be reaching out to Ben Parees (he is currently on vacation) to confirm from an OCP staff engineer / architect perspective if his approval of https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/841 is sufficient signoff from that end.

       PARTIAL ANSWER ^^:  confirmed with Ben Parees in https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C014MHHKUSF/p1646683621293839 that EP merging is currently sufficient OCP "technical leadership" approval.

Previous work

Customers

assuming none

Epic Goal

• Remove this UI from our stack that we cannot support.

Why is this important?

• Reduce support burden.
• Remove Bugzilla burden of addressing continuous CVEs found in this project.

Acceptance Criteria

• All Prometheus upstream UI links are removed
• Related documentation is updated
• Ports/routes etc configured to expose access to this UI are removed such that no configuration we provide enables access to this UI or its codepaths.
• There is no reason any CVEs found in this UI would ever require intervention by the Monitoring Team.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Make the Prometheus Targets information available in Console UI (https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1079)

Previous Work (Optional):

1. …

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Epic Goal

When users configure CMO to interact with systems outside of an OpenShift cluster, we want to provide an easy way to add the cluster ID to the data send.

Why is this important?

Technically this can be achieved today, by adding an identifying label to the remote_write configuration for a given cluster. The operator adding the remote_write integration needs to take care that the label is unique over the managed fleet of clusters. This however adds management complexity. Any given cluster already has a pseudo-unique datum, that can be used for this purpose.

• Starting in 4.9 we support the Prometheus remote_write feature to send metric data to a storage integration outside of the cluster similar to our own Telemetry service.
• In Telemetry we already use the cluster ID to distinguish the various clusters.
• For users of remote_write this could add an easy way to add such distinguishing information.

Scenarios

1. An organisation with multiple OpenShift clusters want to store their metric data centralized in a dedicated system and use remote_write in all their clusters to send this data. When querying their centralized storage, metadata (here a label) is needed to separate the data of the various clusters.
2. Service providers who manage multiple clusters for multiple customers via a centralized storage system need distinguishing metadata too. See https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSD-6573 for example

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• Document how to use this feature

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. none

Previous Work (Optional):

1. none

Open questions::

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Implementation proposal:

Expose a flag in the CMO configuration, that is false by default (keeps backward compatibility) and when set to true will add the _id label to a remote_write configuration. More specifically it will be added to the top of a remote_write relabel_config list via the replace action. This will add the label as expect, but additionally a user could alter this label in a later relabel config to suit any specific requirements (say rename the label or add additional information to the value).
The location of this flag is the remote_write Spec, so this can be set for individual remote_write configurations.

Epic Goal

• Offer the option to double the scrape intervals for CMO controlled ServiceMonitors in single node deployments
• Alternatively automatically double the same scrape intervals if CMO detects an SNO setup

The potential target ServiceMonitors are:

• kubelet
• kube-state-metrics
• node-exporter
• etcd
• openshift-state-metrics

Why is this important?

• Reduce CPU usage in SNO setups
• Specifically doubling the scrape interval is important because:

1. we are confident that this will have the least chance to interfere with existing rules. We typically have rate queries over the last 2 minutes (no shorter time window). With 30 second scrape intervals (the current default) this gives us 4 samples in any 2 minute window. rate needs at least 2 samples to work, we want another 2 for failure tolerance. Doubling the scrape interval will still give us 2 samples in most 2 minute windows. If a scrape fails, a few rule evaluations might fail intermittently.
2. We expect a measureable reduction of CPU resources (see previous work)

Scenarios

1. RAN deployments (Telco Edge) are SNO deployments. In these setups a full CMO deployment is often not needed and the default setup consumes too many resources. OpenShift as a whole has only very limited CPU cycles available and too many cycles are spend on Monitoring

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• ...

Previous Work (Optional):

1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1569

Open questions:

1. Whether doubling some scrape intervals reduces CPU usage to fit into the assigned budget

Non goals

• Allow arbitrarily long scrape intervals. This will interfere with alert and recoring rules
• Implement a global override to scrape intervals.

Problem:

This epic is mainly focused on the 4.10 Release QE activities

Goal:

1. Identify the scenarios for automation
2. Segregate the test Scenarios into smoke, Regression and other user stories
a. Update the https://docs.jboss.org/display/ODC/Automation+Status+Report
3. Align with layered operator teams for updating scripts
3. Work closely with dev team for epic automation
4. Create the automation scripts using cypress
5. Implement CI for nightly builds
6. Execute scripts on sprint basis

Why is it important?

To the track the QE progress at one place in 4.10 Release Confluence page

Use cases:

1. <case>

Acceptance criteria:

1. <criteria>

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Goal:

This epic covers a number of customer requests(RFEs) as well as increases usability.

Why is it important?

Customer satisfaction as well as improved usability.

Acceptance Criteria

1. Allow user to re-arrange the resources which have ben added to nav by the user
2. Improved user experience (form based experience)
   1. Form based editing of Routes
   2. Form based creation and editing of Config Maps
   3. Form base creation of Deployments
3. Improved discovery
   1. Include Share my project on the Add page to increase discoverability
   2. NS Helm Chart Repo
      1. Add tile to Add page for discoverability
      2. Provide a form driven creation experience
      3. User should be able to switch back and forth from Form/YAML
      4. change the intro text to the below & have the link in the intro text bring up the full page form
         1. Browse for charts that help manage complex installations and upgrades. Cluster administrators can customize the content made available in the catalog. Alternatively, developers can try to configure their own custom Helm Chart repository.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

None

Exploration:

Miro board from Epic Exploration

Problem:

Currently we are only able to get limited telemetry from the Dev Sandbox, but not from any of our managed clusters or on prem clusters.

Goals:

1. Enable gathering segment telemetry whenever cluster telemetry is enabled on OSD clusters
2. Have our OSD clusters opt into telemetry by default
3. Work with PM & UX to identify additional metrics to capture in addition to what we have enabled currently on Sandbox.
4. Ability to get a single report from woopra across all of our Sandbox and OSD clusters.
5. Be able to generate a report including metrics of a single cluster or all clusters of a certain type ( sandbox, or OSD)

Why is it important?

In order to improve properly analyze usage and the user experience, we need to be able to gather as much data as possible.

Goal:
Enhance oc adm release new (and related verbs info, extract, mirror) with heterogeneous architecture support

Epic Goal

• Update image registry dependencies (Kubernetes and OpenShift) to the latest versions.

Why is this important?

• New versions usually bring improvements that are needed by the registry and help with getting updates for z-stream.

Scenarios

1. As an OpenShift engineer, I want my components to use the versions of dependencies, so that they get fixes for known issues and can be easily updated in z-stream.

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Kubernetes 1.24

Previous Work (Optional):

1. IR-210

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>

Epic Goal

• Provide a dedicated dashboard for NVIDIA GPU usage visualization in the OpenShift Console.

Why is this important?

• Customers that use GPUs in their clusters usually have the GPU workloads as the main purpose of their cluster. As such, it makes much more sense to have the details about the usage they are doing of GPGPU resources AND CPU/RAM rather than just CPU/RAM

Scenarios

1. As an admin of a cluster dedicated to data science, I want to quickly find out how much of my very costly resources are currently in use and if things are getting queued due to lack of resources

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. The NVIDIA GPU Operator must export to prometheus the relevant data

Open questions::

1. Will NVIDIA agree to these extra data exports in their GPU Operator?

I asked Zvonko Kaiser and he seemed open to it. I need to confirm with Shiva Merla

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

• Run OpenShift builds that do not execute as the "root" user on the host node.

Why is this important?

• OpenShift builds require an elevated set of capabilities to build a container image
• Builds currently run as root to maintain adequate performance
• Container workloads should run as non-root from the host's perspective. Containers running as root are a known security risk.
• Builds currently run as root and require a privileged container. See BUILD-225 for removing the privileged container requirement.

Scenarios

1. Run BuildConfigs in a multi-tenant environment
2. Run BuildConfigs in a heightened security environment/deployment

Acceptance Criteria

• Developers can opt into running builds in a cri-o user namespace by providing an environment variable with a specific value.
• When the correct environment variable is provided, builds run in a cri-o user namespace, and the build pod does not require the "privileged: true" security context.
• User namespace builds can pass basic test scenarios for the Docker and Source strategy build.
• Steps to run unprivileged builds are documented.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Buildah supports running inside a non-privileged container
2. CRI-O allows workloads to opt into running containers in user namespaces.

Previous Work (Optional):

1. BUILD-225 - remove privileged requirement for builds.

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

1. Proposed title of this feature request
--> Alert generation when the etcd container memory consumption goes beyond 90%

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
--> When the etcd database starts growing rapidly due to some high number of objects like secrets, events, or configmap generation by application/workload, the memory and CPU consumption of APIserver and etcd container (control plane component) spikes up and eventually the control plane nodes goes to hung/unresponsive or crash due to out of memory errors as some of the critical processes/services running on master nodes get killed. Hence we request an alert/alarm when the ETCD container's memory consumption goes beyond 90% so that the cluster administrator can take some action before the cluster/nodes go unresponsive.

I see we already have a etcdExcessiveDatabaseGrowth Prometheus rule which helps when the surge in etcd writes leading to a 50% increase in database size over the past four hours on etcd instance however it does not consider the memory consumption:

$ oc get prometheusrules etcd-prometheus-rules -o yaml|grep -i etcdExcessiveDatabaseGrowth -A 9

• alert: etcdExcessiveDatabaseGrowth
  annotations:
  description: 'etcd cluster "{{ $labels.job }}": Observed surge in etcd writes
  leading to 50% increase in database size over the past four hours on etcd
  instance {{ $labels.instance }}, please check as it might be disruptive.'
  expr: |
  increase(((etcd_mvcc_db_total_size_in_bytes/etcd_server_quota_backend_bytes)*100)[240m:1m]) > 50
  for: 10m
  labels:
  severity: warning

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
--> Once the etcd memory consumption goes beyond 90-95% of total ram as it's system critical container, the OCP cluster goes unresponsive causing revenue loss to business and impacting the productivity of users of the openshift cluster. 

4. List any affected packages or components.
--> etcd

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3124

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-14415. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-14315. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4501. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

IPV6 interface and IP is missing in all pods created in OCP 4.12 EC-2.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Every time

Steps to Reproduce:

We create network-attachment-definitions.k8s.cni.cncf.io in OCP cluster at namespace scope for our software pods to get IPV6 IPs. 

Actual results:

Pods do not receive IPv6 addresses

Expected results:

Pods receive IPv6 addresses

Additional info:

This has been working flawlessly till OCP 4.10. 21 however we are trying same code in OCP 4.12-ec2 and we notice all our pods are missing ipv6 address and we have to restart pods couple times for them to get ipv6 address.

• https://github.com/openshift/ironic-static-ip-manager/pull/38

This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2094362](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094362). The following is the description of the original bug:
—
Description of problem:
A change [1] was introduced to split the kube-apiserver SLO rules into 2 groups to reduce the load on Prometheus (see bug 2004585).

[1] https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator/commit/4a1751ee86cda37f0d9ea520cac09f91ebc3abe9

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.9 (because the change was backported to 4.9.z)

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install OCP 4.9
2. Retrieve kube-apiserver-slos*
oc get -n openshift-kube-apiserver prometheusrules kube-apiserver-slos -o yaml
oc get -n openshift-kube-apiserver prometheusrules kube-apiserver-slos-basic -o yaml

Actual results:

The KubeAPIErrorBudgetBurn alert with labels

exists both in kube-apiserver-slos and kube-apiserver-slos-basic.

The alerting rules is evaluated twice. The same is true for recording rules like "apiserver_request:burnrate1h" and in this case, it can trigger warning logs in the Prometheus pods:

> level=warn component="rule manager" group=kube-apiserver.rules msg="Error on ingesting out-of-order result from rule evaluation" numDropped=283

Expected results:

I presume that kube-apiserver-slos shouldn't exist since it's been replaced by kube-apiserver-slos-basic and kube-apiserver-slos-extended.

Additional info:

Discovered while investigating bug 2091902

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator/pull/1397

Description of problem:

With every pod update we are executing a mutate operation to add the pod port to the port group or add the pod IP to an address set. This functionally doesn't hurt, since mutate will not add duplicate values to the same set. However, this is bad for performance. For example, with a 730 network policies affecting a pod, and issuing 7 pod updates would result in over 5k transactions.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1447

Node healthz server was added in 4.13 with https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/commit/c8489e3ff9c321e77f265dc9d484ed2549df4a6b and https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/commit/9a836e3a547f3464d433ce8b9eef336624d51858. We need to configure it by default on 0.0.0.0:10256 on CNO for ovnk, just like we do for sdn.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1742

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12956. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12910. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12904. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

In order to test proxy installations, the CI base image for OpenShift on OpenStack needs netcat.

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/7163

While running a PerfScale test we noticed that the hosted ovnkube-master pods always initially error on deployment. They eventually succeed on retry however. 

This is running quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release:4.11.11-x86_64 for the hosted clusters and the hypershift operator is quay.io/hypershift/hypershift-operator:4.11 on a 4.11.9 management cluster.

An example of the error in the ovnkube-master container:

```

F1102 13:27:51.935600       1 ovnkube.go:133] error when trying to initialize libovsdb SB client: unable to connect to any endpoints: failed to connect to ssl:ovnkube-master-0.ovnkube-master-internal.clusters-perf-pqd-0021.svc.cluster.local:9642: failed to open connection: dial tcp 10.131.8.25:9642: connect: connection refused. failed to connect to ssl:ovnkube-master-1.ovnkube-master-internal.clusters-perf-pqd-0021.svc.cluste

```

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1641

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5100. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5068. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

virtual media provisioning fails when iLO Ironic driver is used

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. attempt virtual media provisioning on a node configured with ilo-virtualmedia:// drivers
2.
3.

Actual results:

Provisioning fails with "An auth plugin is required to determine endpoint URL" error

Expected results:

Provisioning succeeds

Additional info:

Relevant log snippet:

3742 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector [None req-e58ac1f2-fac6-4d28-be9e-983fa900a19b - - - - - -] Unable to start managed inspection for node e4445d43-3458-4cee-9cbe-6da1de75      78cd: An auth plugin is required to determine endpoint URL: keystoneauth1.exceptions.auth_plugins.MissingAuthPlugin: An auth plugin is required to determine endpoint URL
 3743 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector Traceback (most recent call last):
 3744 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic/drivers/modules/inspector.py", line 210, in _start_managed_inspection
 3745 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector     task.driver.boot.prepare_ramdisk(task, ramdisk_params=params)
 3746 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic_lib/metrics.py", line 59, in wrapped
 3747 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector     result = f(*args, **kwargs)
 3748 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic/drivers/modules/ilo/boot.py", line 408, in prepare_ramdisk
 3749 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector     iso = image_utils.prepare_deploy_iso(task, ramdisk_params,
 3750 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic/drivers/modules/image_utils.py", line 624, in prepare_deploy_iso
 3751 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector     return prepare_iso_image(inject_files=inject_files)
 3752 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic/drivers/modules/image_utils.py", line 537, in _prepare_iso_image
 3753 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector     image_url = img_handler.publish_image(
 3754 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic/drivers/modules/image_utils.py", line 193, in publish_image
 3755 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector     swift_api = swift.SwiftAPI()
 3756 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic/common/swift.py", line 66, in __init__
 3757 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector     endpoint = keystone.get_endpoint('swift', session=session)

• https://github.com/openshift/ironic-image/pull/342

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-13013. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12854. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11550. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

`cluster-reader` ClusterRole should have ["get", "list", "watch"] permissions for a number of privileged CRs, but lacks them for the API Group "k8s.ovn.org", which includes CRs such as EgressFirewalls, EgressIPs, etc.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.10 - 4.12 OVN

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a cluster with OVN components, e.g. EgressFirewall
2. Check permissions of ClusterRole `cluster-reader`

Actual results:

No permissions for OVN resources 

Expected results:

Get, list, and watch verb permissions for OVN resources

Additional info:

Looks like a similar bug was opened for "network-attachment-definitions" in OCPBUGS-6959 (whose closure is being contested).

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1811

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1428. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

When using an OperatorGroup attached to a service account, AND if there is a secret present in the namespace, the operator installation will fail with the message:
the service account does not have any API secret sa=testx-ns/testx-sa
This issue seems similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094303 - which was resolved in 4.11.0 - however, the new element now, is that the presence of a secret in the namespace  is causing the issue.
The name of the secret seems significant - suggesting something somewhere is depending on the order that secrets are listed in. For example, If the secret in the namespace is called "asecret", the problem does not occur. If it is called "zsecret", the problem always occurs.

"zsecret" is not a "kubernetes.io/service-account-token". The issue I have raised here relates to Opaque secrets - zsecret is an Opaque secret. The issue may apply to other types of secrets, but specifically my issue is that when there is an opaque secret present in the namespace, the operator install fails as described. I aught to be allowed to have an opaque secret present in the namespace where I am installing the operator.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.0 & 4.11.1

How reproducible:

100% reproducible

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Create namespace: oc new-project testx-ns
2. oc apply -f api-secret-issue.yaml

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

API YAML:

cat api-secret-issue.yaml 
apiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
metadata:
  name: zsecret
  namespace: testx-ns
  annotations:
   kubernetes.io/service-account.name: testx-sa
type: Opaque
stringData:
  mykey: mypass

—

apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
  name: testx-sa
  namespace: testx-ns

—

kind: OperatorGroup
apiVersion: operators.coreos.com/v1
metadata:
  name: testx-og
  namespace: testx-ns
spec:
  serviceAccountName: "testx-sa"
  targetNamespaces:
  - testx-ns

—

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: Role
metadata:
  name: testx-role
  namespace: testx-ns
rules:

• apiGroups: ["*"]
    resources: ["*"]
    verbs: ["*"] 
    
  —

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
  name: testx-rolebinding
  namespace: testx-ns
roleRef:
  apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
  kind: Role
  name: testx-role
subjects:

• kind: ServiceAccount
    name: testx-sa
    namespace: testx-ns

—

apiVersion: operators.coreos.com/v1alpha1
kind: Subscription
metadata:
  name: etcd-operator
  namespace: testx-ns
spec:
  channel: singlenamespace-alpha
  installPlanApproval: Automatic
  name: etcd
  source: community-operators
  sourceNamespace: openshift-marketplace

• https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/pull/416

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1325

Description of problem:
Cannot scale up worker node have deploying OCP 4.11.1 cluster via UPI on Azure

5h2m Warning FailedCreate machine/pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4 InvalidConfiguration: failed to reconcile machine "pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4": failed to create vm pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4: failure sending request for machine pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4: cannot create vm: compute.VirtualMachinesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=404 - Original Error: Code="NotFound" Message="The Image '/subscriptions/e639e479-2737-4b3d-b338-f1928f6429a1/resourceGroups/mlpipe-2163-azpln-rg/providers/Microsoft.Compute/images/pokus-2knkh-gen2' cannot be found in 'northeurope' region."

Customer would like to have the installer create machineset from the inital installation, therefore Kubernetes manifest files that define the worker machines were not removed during the installation.

Highlights:
Can I please let help verifying if these are the correct steps to have the initial installation created and manage the worker machines?Is there an explanation on how changing the image to -gen2 in [concat(parameters('baseName'),'-gen2')] from the 02_storage.json template can resolve the problem?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Environment:
OCP 4.11.1 UPI install on Azure using ARM
VM size:
bootstrap: Standard_D4s_v3
master: Standard_D4s_v3

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Following the step described in the document: Installing a cluster on Azure using ARM templates .

In the install-config.yaml, worker replicas was set to 0

compute:
- architecture: amd64
  hyperthreading: Enabled
  name: worker
  platform: {}
  replicas: 3   
controlPlane:
  architecture: amd64
  hyperthreading: Enabled
  name: master
  platform: {}
  replicas: 3

After creating the manifests described in this step: Creating the Kubernetes manifest and Ignition config files only control plane machines manifests were removed, worker machines manifests remain untouchedAfter three masters and three worker nodes were created by ARM templates, additional worker were added using machine sets via command

oc scale --replicas=1 machineset cluster-g7rzv-worker-francecentral1 -n openshift-machine-api` 

Actual results:
No addition node visible from `oc get nodes` and the following error occur:

5h2m Warning FailedCreate machine/pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4 InvalidConfiguration: failed to reconcile machine "pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4": failed to create vm pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4: failure sending request for machine pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4: cannot create vm: compute.VirtualMachinesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=404 - Original Error: Code="NotFound" Message="The Image '/subscriptions/e639e479-2737-4b3d-b338-f1928f6429a1/resourceGroups/mlpipe-2163-azpln-rg/providers/Microsoft.Compute/images/pokus-2knkh-gen2' cannot be found in 'northeurope' region."

The customer found out that this can be resolved if changing the -image to -gen2 in [concat(parameters('baseName'),'-gen2')] from the 02_storage.json template

Expected results:
The installer should be able to create and manage machineset

Additional info:
SFDC case #03304526

Slack discussion, might due to MAO not able to support UPI in Azure Thread1, Thread2
 

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6681

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7409. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7374. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Originally reported by lance5890 in issue https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/issues/1000

The controllers sometimes get stuck on listing members in failure scenarios, this is known and can be mitigated by simply restarting the CEO. 

similar BZ 2093819 with stuck controllers was fixed slightly different in https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/commit/4816fab709e11e0681b760003be3f1de12c9c103

This fix was contributed by lance5890, thanks a lot!

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/1007

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10497. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10213. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-8468. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

RHCOS is being published to new AWS regions (https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6861) but aws-sdk-go need to be bumped to recognize those regions

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

master/4.14

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. openshift-install create install-config
2. Try to select ap-south-2 as a region
3.

Actual results:

New regions are not found. New regions are: ap-south-2, ap-southeast-4, eu-central-2, eu-south-2, me-central-1.

Expected results:

Installer supports and displays the new regions in the Survey

Additional info:

See https://github.com/openshift/installer/blob/master/pkg/asset/installconfig/aws/regions.go#L13-L23

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/7000

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11998. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10678. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10655. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
The dev console shows a list of samples. The user can create a sample based on a git repository. But some of these samples doesn't include a git repository reference and could not be created.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Tested different frontend versions against a 4.11 cluster and all (oldest tested frontend was 4.8) show the sample without git repository.

But the result also depends on the installed samples operator and installed ImageStreams.

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Switch to the Developer perspective
2. Navigate to Add > All Samples
3. Search for Jboss
4. Click on "JBoss EAP XP 4.0 with OpenJDK 11" (for example)

Actual results:
The git repository is not filled and the create button is disabled.

Expected results:
Samples without git repositories should not be displayed in the list.

Additional info:
The Git repository is saved as "sampleRepo" in the ImageStream tag section.

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12759

• https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1627

Changelog between 3.5.5 and 3.5.4:
https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/main/CHANGELOG/CHANGELOG-3.5.md#v355-tbd

Changelog between 3.5.3 and 3.5.4:
https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/main/CHANGELOG/CHANGELOG-3.5.md#v354-2022-04-24

• https://github.com/openshift/etcd/pull/155

• https://github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/pull/78

This is a clone of OCPBUGS-853.

Description of problem:

Large OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.24 - Cluster is failing to update router-certs secret in openshift-config-managed namespace as the given secret is too big.

2022-09-01T06:24:15.157333294Z 2022-09-01T06:24:15.157Z ERROR operator.init.controller.certificate_publisher_controller controller/controller.go:266  Reconciler error  {"name": "foo-bar", "namespace": "openshift-ingress-operator", "error": "failed to ensure global secret: failed to update published router certificates secret: Secret \"router-certs\" is invalid: data: Too long: must have at most 1048576 bytes"}

The OpenShift Container Platform 4 - Cluster has 180 IngressController configured with endpointPublishingStrategy set to private.

Now the default certificate needs to be replaced but is not properly replicated to openshift-authentication namespace and potentially other location because of the problem mentioned (since the required secret can not be updated)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.24

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OpenShift Container Platform 4.10
2. Create 180 IngressController with specific certificates
3. Check openshift-ingress-operator logs to see how it fails to update/create the necessary secret in openshift-config-managed

Actual results:

2022-09-01T06:24:15.157333294Z 2022-09-01T06:24:15.157Z ERROR operator.init.controller.certificate_publisher_controller controller/controller.go:266  Reconciler error  {"name": "foo-bar", "namespace": "openshift-ingress-operator", "error": "failed to ensure global secret: failed to update published router certificates secret: Secret \"router-certs\" is invalid: data: Too long: must have at most 1048576 bytes"}

Expected results:

No matter how many IngressController is created, secret management taken care by Operators need to work, even if data exceed 1 MB size limitation. In that case an approach needs to exist to split data into multiple secrets or handle it otherwise.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pull/894

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1282

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-17703. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-17365. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
When we update a Secret referenced in the BareMetalHost, an immediate reconcile of the corresponding BMH is not triggered. In most states we requeue each CR after a timeout, so we should eventually see the changes.

In the case of BMC Secrets, this has been broken since the fix for OCPBUGS-1080 in 4.12.

• https://github.com/openshift/baremetal-operator/pull/299

• https://github.com/openshift/baremetal-runtimecfg/pull/269

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1329. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

etcd and kube-apiserver pods get restarted due to failed liveness probes while deleting/re-creating pods on SNO

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.32

How reproducible:

Not always, after ~10 attempts

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy SNO with Telco DU profile applied
2. Create multiple pods with local storage volumes attached(attaching yaml manifest)
3. Force delete and re-create pods 10 times

Actual results:

etcd and kube-apiserver pods get restarted, making to cluster unavailable for a period of time

Expected results:

etcd and kube-apiserver do not get restarted

Additional info:

Attaching must-gather.

Please let me know if any additional info is required. Thank you!

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/943

Backport to 4.11.z

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-storage-operator/pull/313

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6766. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2083087 (OCPBUGSM-44070) to backport this issue.

Description of problem:
"Delete dependent objects of this resource" is a bit of confusing for some users because when creating the Application in Dev console not only the deployment but also IS, route, svc, secret objects will be created as well. When deleting the Application (in fact it is deployment), there is an option called "Delete dependent objects of this resource" and some users might think this means the IS, route, svc and any other objects which are created alongside with the deployment will be deleted as well

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.8

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create Application in Dev console
2. Delete the deployment
3. Check "Delete dependent objects of this resource"

Actual results:
Only deployment will be deleted and IS, svc, route will not be deleted

Expected results:
We either change the description of this option, or we really delete IS, svc, route and any other objects created under this Application.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12532

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6668

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5191. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5164. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

It looks like the ODC doesn't register KNATIVE_SERVING and KNATIVE_EVENTING flags. Those are based on KnativeServing and KnativeEventing CRs, but they are looking for v1alpha1 version of those: https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/f72519fdf2267ad91cc0aa51467113cc36423a49/frontend/packages/knative-plugin/console-extensions.json#L6-L8
This PR https://github.com/openshift-knative/serverless-operator/pull/1695 moved the CRs to v1beta1, and that breaks that ODC discovery.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Openshift 4.8, Serverless Operator 1.27

Additional info:

https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CHGU4P8UU/p1671634903447019

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12403

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1805. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
The vSphere CSI cloud.conf lists the single datacenter from platform workspace config but in a multi-zone setup (https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/918 ) there may be more than the one datacenter.

This issue is resulting in PVs failing to attach because the virtual machines can't be find in any other datacenter. For example:

0s Warning FailedAttachVolume pod/image-registry-85b5d5db54-m78vp AttachVolume.Attach failed for volume "pvc-ab1a0611-cb3b-418d-bb3b-1e7bbe2a69ed" : rpc error: code = Internal desc = failed to find VirtualMachine for node:"rbost-zonal-ghxp2-worker-3-xm7gw". Error: virtual machine wasn't found  

The machine above lives in datacenter-2 but the CSI cloud.conf is only aware of the datacenter IBMCloud.

$ oc get cm vsphere-csi-config -o yaml  -n openshift-cluster-csi-drivers | grep datacenters
    datacenters = "IBMCloud" 

• https://github.com/openshift/vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator/pull/130

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6831. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
The console crashes when it used with a user settings ConfigMap that is created with a 4.13+ console. This version saves "null" for the key "console.pinnedResources" which doesn't happen before and the old console version could not handle this well.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.8-4.12

How reproducible:
Always, but only in the edge case that someone used a newer console first and then downgraded.

This can happen only by manually applying the user settings ConfigMap or when downgrading a cluster.

Steps to Reproduce:
Open the user-settings ConfigMap and set "console.pinedResources" to "null" (with quotes as all ConfigMap values needs to be strings)

Or run this patch command:

oc patch -n openshift-console-user-settings configmaps user-settings-kubeadmin --type=merge --patch '{"data":{"console.pinnedResources":"null"}}'

Open console...

Actual results:
Console crashes

Expected results:
Console should not crash

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12581

• https://github.com/openshift/multus-cni/pull/152

Description of problem:

To address: 'Static Pod is managed but errored" err="managed container xxx does not have Resource.Requests'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

Already merged in https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-controller-manager-operator/pull/660

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-controller-manager-operator/pull/667

This bug was initially created as a copy of
Bug #2096605
I am copying this bug because: the parent bug solved the validation aspect of diskType but now the description of diskType in
https://github.com/openshift/installer/blob/master/data/data/install.openshift.io_installconfigs.yaml#L2914-L2923
needs to be updated.

Version: 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-06-06-201913

Platform: vSphere IPI

What happened?
1. If user inputs an invalid value for platform.vsphere.diskType in install-config.yaml file, there is no validation checking for diskType and doesn't exit with error, but continues the installation, which is not the same behavior as in 4.10.

After all vms are provisioned, I checked that the disk provision type is thick.

2. If user doesn't set platform.vsphere.diskType in install-config.yaml file, the default disk provision type is thick, but not the vSphere default storage policy. On VMC, the default policy is thin, so maybe the description of diskType should also need to be updated.

$ ./openshift-install explain installconfig.platform.vsphere.diskType
KIND: InstallConfig
VERSION: v1

RESOURCE: <string>
Valid Values: "","thin","thick","eagerZeroedThick"
DiskType is the name of the disk provisioning type, valid values are thin, thick, and eagerZeroedThick. When not specified, it will be set according to the default storage policy of vsphere.

What did you expect to happen?
validation for diskType

How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)?
set diskType to invalid value in install-config.yaml and install the cluster

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6256

As discussed previously by email, customer support case 03211616 requests a means to use the latest patch version of a given X.Y golang via imagestreams, with the blocking issue being the lack of X.Y tags for the go-toolset containers on RHCC.

The latter has now been fixed with the latest version also getting a :1.17 tag, and the imagestream source has been modified accordingly, which will get picked up in 4.12. We can now fix this in 4.11.z by backporting this to the imagestream files bundled in cluster-samples-operator.

/cc Ian Watson Feny Mehta

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-samples-operator/pull/467

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-501. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem: 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.10.16

How reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Edit the apiserver resource and add spec.audit.customRules field

$ oc get apiserver cluster -o yaml
spec:
audit:
customRules:

• group: system:authenticated:oauth
  profile: AllRequestBodies
• group: system:authenticated
  profile: AllRequestBodies
  profile: Default

2. Allow the kube-apiserver pods to rollout new revision.
3. Once the kube-apiserver pods are in new revision execute $ oc get dc

Actual results:

Error from server (InternalError): an error on the server ("This request caused apiserver to panic. Look in the logs for details.") has prevented the request from succeeding (get deploymentconfigs.apps.openshift.io)

Expected results: The command "oc get dc" should display the deploymentconfig without any error.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/openshift-apiserver/pull/336

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pull/940

• https://github.com/openshift/aws-ebs-csi-driver/pull/227

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11844. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5548. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
This is a follow-up on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2083087 and https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12390

When creating a Deployment, DeploymentConfig, or Knative Service with enabled Pipeline, and then deleting it again with the enabled option "Delete other resources created by console" (only available on 4.13+ with the PR above) the automatically created Pipeline is not deleted.

When the user tries to create the same resource with a Pipeline again this fails with an error:

An error occurred
secrets "nodeinfo-generic-webhook-secret" already exists

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.13

(we might want to backport this together with https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12390 and OCPBUGS-5547)

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OpenShift Pipelines operator (tested with 1.8.2)
2. Create a new project
3. Navigate to Add > Import from git and create an application
4. Case 1: In the topology select the new resource and delete it
5. Case 2: In the topology select the application group and delete the complete app

Actual results:
Case 1: Delete resources:

1. Deployment (tries it twice!) $name
2. Service $name
3. Route $name
4. ImageStream $name

Case 2: Delete application:

1. Deployment (just once) $name
2. Service $name
3. Route $name
4. ImageStream $name

Expected results:
Case 1: Delete resource:

1. Delete Deployment $name should be called just once
2. (Keep this deletion) Service $name
3. (Keep this deletion) Route $name
4. (Keep this deletion) ImageStream $name
5. Missing deletion of the Tekton Pipeline $name
6. Missing deletion of the Tekton TriggerTemplate with generated name trigger-template-$name-$random
7. Missing deletion of the Secret $name-generic-webhook-secret
8. Missing deletion of the Secret $name-github-webhook-secret

Case 2: Delete application:

1. (Keep this deletion) Deployment $name
2. (Keep this deletion) Service $name
3. (Keep this deletion) Route $name
4. (Keep this deletion) ImageStream $name
5. Missing deletion of the Tekton Pipeline $name
6. Missing deletion of the Tekton TriggerTemplate with generated name trigger-template-$name-$random
7. Missing deletion of the Secret $name-generic-webhook-secret
8. Missing deletion of the Secret $name-github-webhook-secret

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12837

Description of problem:

Provisioning interface on master node not getting ipv4 dhcp ip address from bootstrap dhcp server on OCP 4.10.16 IPI BareMetal install.

Customer is performing an OCP 4.10.16 IPI BareMetal install and bootstrap node provisions just fine, but when master nodes are booted for provisioning, they are not getting an ipv4 address via dhcp. As such, the install is not moving forward at this point.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.10.16

How reproducible:

Perform OCP 4.10.16 IPI BareMetal install.

Actual results:

provisioning interface comes up (as evidenced by ipv6 address) but is not getting an ipv4 address via dhcp. OCP install / provisioning fails at this point.

Expected results:

provisioning interface successfully received an ipv4 ip address and successfully provisioned master nodes (and subsequently worker nodes as well.)

Additional info:

As a troubleshooting measure, manually adding an ipv4 ip address did allow the coreos image on the bootstrap node to be reached via curl.

Further, the kernel boot line for the first master node was updated for a static ip addresss assignment for further confirmation that the master node would successfully image this way which further confirming that the issue is the provisioning interface not receiving an ipv4 ip address from the dhcp server.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/pull/298

Description of problem:

To address: 'Static Pod is managed but errored" err="managed container xxx does not have Resource.Requests'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

Already merged in https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator/pull/1398

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator/pull/1412

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7445. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7207. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
At some point in the mtu-migration development a configuration file was generated at /etc/cno/mtu-migration/config which was used as a flag to indicate to configure-ovs that a migration procedure was in progress. When that file was missing, it was assumed the migration procedure was over and configure-ovs did some cleaning on behalf of it.

But that changed and /etc/cno/mtu-migration/config is never set. That causes configure-ovs to remove mtu-migration information when the procedure is still in progress making it to use incorrect MTU values and either causing nodes to be tainted with "ovn.k8s.org/mtu-too-small" blocking the procedure itself or causing network disruption until the procedure is over.

However, this was not a problem for the CI job as it doesn't use the migration procedure as documented for the sake of saving limited time available to run CI jobs. The CI merges two steps of the procedure into one so that there is never a reboot while the procedure is in progress and hiding this issue.

This was probably not detected in QE as well for the same reason as CI.

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3607

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7732. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

When services are deleted, the services controller cache should also remove the service from its top level cache to avoid growing forever.

While this is not an issue in 4.13 once the lb_cache rework merges [1], the 4.12 and older branches have this problem because that rework is meant for 4.13 only.

[1]: https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/pull/3387

This is the location where alreadyApplied is not deleting the removal: 
https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/blob/cf9fb51510e1870961bf3a0f064b73536757a4f8/go-controller/pkg/ovn/controller/services/services_controller.go#L269

It should do the similar changes depicted here (currently merged upstream):
https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/blob/cd78ae1af4657d38bdc41003a8737aa958d62b9d/go-controller/pkg/ovn/controller/services/services_controller.go#L322-L324

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. create service -- use unique name
2. remove service
3. notice how alreadyApplied grows and never gets smaller
4. repeat

Actual results:

^^

Expected results:

alreadyApplied should not grow forever

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1598

Description of problem:

Upgrade to 4.10 is stuck looping in syncEgressFirewall

We see transacting operations with context deadline exceeded.

It looks to be trying to process 2.8 million records is one go.

2023-02-21T19:55:06.514097513Z I0221 19:55:06.435220 1 client.go:781] "msg"="transacting operations" "database"="OVN_Northbound" "operations"="[{Op:mutate Table:Logical_Switch Row:map[] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[{Column:acls Mutator:delete Value:{GoSet:[{GoUUID:6a3ad543-a77d-4700-83b8-5ccae6b2d067} ID:1c5297ff-8588-467a-93f4-22f22d609563} {GoUUID:f6288ed3-3928-45a8-ae57-40ed94cfa249} {GoUUID:04bf90c2-fde1-4a10-baaa-6a3f1d8e2931} {GoUUID:c6609536-857c-48ae-9125-9505753180 a8} {GoUUID:c79b4398-d7cc-4dcf-8c1d-11484f318324} {GoUUID:4323ac2c-033e-43c3-885b-e951cd7a4159} {GoUUID:7b316a80-076f-4266-b7d2-bd69b1d4b874} {GoUUID:57dfecb2-2f94-4cd8-a277-8 b28205e1048} {GoUUID:2c039f15-ff11-4ceb-aa82-bcbe82fc86d1} {GoUUID:063c4121-73c3-4d53-a89d-1063e775146b} {GoUUID:25c788e3-6146-4571-98bf-61010100a22a} {GoUUID:3d3c150f-1296-4d 91-b334-506f28bff4bd}]}}] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {ba9652de-5aae-4a74-a512-29f775e38c19}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:}]: context deadline exceeded 

2023-02-21T19:55:18.739739417Z E0221 19:55:18.643127       1 master.go:1369] Failed (will retry) in syncing syncEgressFirewall: failed to remove reject acl from node logical switches: error while removing ACLS: [6a3ad543-a77d-4700-83b8-5ccae6b2d067 8e004991-0382-455f-9901-33ef724acbc2 

Everything is built into one operation via:
https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/blob/release-4.10/go-controller/pkg/libovsdbops/switch.go#L243

TrandactAndCheck is being called with a 10s timeout and this operation never completes. 
 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.50

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Upgrade completes

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1629

Description of problem:

Similar to OCPBUGS-11636 ccoctl needs to be updated to account for the s3 bucket changes described in https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/heads-up-amazon-s3-security-changes-are-coming-in-april-of-2023/

these changes have rolled out to us-east-2 and China regions as of today and will roll out to additional regions in the near future

See OCPBUGS-11636 for additional information

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Reproducible in affected regions.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Use "ccoctl aws create-all" flow to create STS infrastructure in an affected region like us-east-2. Notice that document upload fails because the s3 bucket is created in a state that does not allow usage of ACLs with the s3 bucket.

Actual results:

./ccoctl aws create-all --name abutchertestue2 --region us-east-2 --credentials-requests-dir ./credrequests --output-dir _output
2023/04/11 13:01:06 Using existing RSA keypair found at _output/serviceaccount-signer.private
2023/04/11 13:01:06 Copying signing key for use by installer
2023/04/11 13:01:07 Bucket abutchertestue2-oidc created
2023/04/11 13:01:07 Failed to create Identity provider: failed to upload discovery document in the S3 bucket abutchertestue2-oidc: AccessControlListNotSupported: The bucket does not allow ACLs
        status code: 400, request id: 2TJKZC6C909WVRK7, host id: zQckCPmozx+1yEhAj+lnJwvDY9rG14FwGXDnzKIs8nQd4fO4xLWJW3p9ejhFpDw3c0FE2Ggy1Yc=

Expected results:

"ccoctl aws create-all" successfully creates IAM and S3 infrastructure. OIDC discovery and JWKS documents are successfully uploaded to the S3 bucket and are publicly accessible.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cloud-credential-operator/pull/530

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7650. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-672. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Redhat-operator part of the marketplace is failing regularly due to startup probe timing out connecting to registry-server container part of the same pod within 1 sec which in turn increases CPU/Mem usage on Master nodes:

62m         Normal    Scheduled                pod/redhat-operators-zb4j7                         Successfully assigned openshift-marketplace/redhat-operators-zb4j7 to ip-10-0-163-212.us-west-2.compute.internal by ip-10-0-149-93
62m         Normal    AddedInterface           pod/redhat-operators-zb4j7                         Add eth0 [10.129.1.112/23] from ovn-kubernetes
62m         Normal    Pulling                  pod/redhat-operators-zb4j7                         Pulling image "registry.redhat.io/redhat/redhat-operator-index:v4.11"
62m         Normal    Pulled                   pod/redhat-operators-zb4j7                         Successfully pulled image "registry.redhat.io/redhat/redhat-operator-index:v4.11" in 498.834447ms
62m         Normal    Created                  pod/redhat-operators-zb4j7                         Created container registry-server
62m         Normal    Started                  pod/redhat-operators-zb4j7                         Started container registry-server
62m         Warning   Unhealthy                pod/redhat-operators-zb4j7                         Startup probe failed: timeout: failed to connect service ":50051" within 1s
62m         Normal    Killing                  pod/redhat-operators-zb4j7                         Stopping container registry-server


Increasing the threshold of the probe might fix the problem:
  livenessProbe:
      exec:
        command:
        - grpc_health_probe
        - -addr=:50051
      failureThreshold: 3
      initialDelaySeconds: 10
      periodSeconds: 10
      successThreshold: 1
      timeoutSeconds: 5
    name: registry-server
    ports:
    - containerPort: 50051
      name: grpc
      protocol: TCP
    readinessProbe:
      exec:
        command:
        - grpc_health_probe
        - -addr=:50051
      failureThreshold: 3
      initialDelaySeconds: 5
      periodSeconds: 10
      successThreshold: 1
      timeoutSeconds: 5 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OSD cluster using 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-08-26-162248 payload
2. Inspect redhat-operator pod in openshift-marketplace namespace
3. Observe the resource usage ( CPU and Memory ) of the pod 

Actual results:

Redhat-operator failing leading to increase to CPU and Mem usage on master nodes regularly during the startup

Expected results:

Redhat-operator startup probe succeeding and no spikes in resource on master nodes

Additional info:

Attached cpu, memory and event traces.

• https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/pull/509

We're seeing a slight uptick in how long upgrades are taking[1][2]. We are not 100% sure of the cause, but it looks like it started with 4.11 rc.7. There's no obvious culprits in the diff[3].

Looking at some of the jobs, we are seeing the gaps between kube-scheduler being updated and then machine-api appear to take longer. Example job run[4] showing 10+ minutes waiting for it.

TRT had a debugging session, and we have two suggestions:

• Adding logging around when CVO sees an operator version changed

• Instead of a fixed polling interval at 5 minutes (which is what we think CVO is doing), would it be possible to trigger on the CO to know when to look again? We think there could be some substantial savings on upgrade time by doing this.

[1] https://search.ci.openshift.org/graph/metrics?metric=job%3Aduration%3Atotal%3Aseconds&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-sdn-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-azure-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-sdn-upgrade
[2] https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.12/analysis?test=Cluster%20upgrade.%5Bsig-cluster-lifecycle%5D%20cluster%20upgrade%20should%20complete%20in%2075.00%20minutes
[3] https://amd64.ocp.releases.ci.openshift.org/releasestream/4-stable/release/4.11.0-rc.7
[4] https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-azure-sdn-upgrade/1556865989923049472

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pull/826

libovsdb builds transaction log messages for every transaction and then throws them away if the log level is not 4 or above. This wastes a bunch of CPU at scale and increases pod ready latency.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1374

Description of problem:

TO address: 'Static Pod is managed but errored" err="managed container xxx does not have Resource.Requests'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-scheduler-operator/pull/449

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5067. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Since coreos-installer writes to stdout, its logs are not available for us.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/ironic-agent-image/pull/67

Description of problem:

After setting the appsDomain flag in the OpenShift Ingress configuration, all Routes that are generated are based off this domain.

This includes OpenShift-core Routes, which can result in failing health-checks, such as seen with the OpenShift Web Console.

According to the documentation[0], the appsDomain value should only be used by user-created Routes and is not intended to be seen when Openshift components are reconciled.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OpenShift 4.12

How reproducible:

Everytime

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Provision a new cluster
2. Configure appsDomain value
3. Delete the OpenShift Console Route:
     oc delete routes -n openshift-console console
4. The Route is automatically reconciled

Actual results:

The re-created Route uses the appsDomain value, resulting in failed health-checks throughout the cluster.

Expected results:

The Console and all other OpenShift-core components should use the default domain.

Additional info: