Back to index

4.11.43

Jump to: Complete Features | Incomplete Features | Complete Epics | Incomplete Epics | Other Complete | Other Incomplete |

Changes from 4.10.67

Note: this page shows the Feature-Based Change Log for a release

Complete Features

These features were completed when this image was assembled

Problem:

Certain Insights Advisor features differentiate between RHEL and OCP advisor

Goal:

Address top priority UI misalignments between RHEL and OCP advisor. Address UI features dropped from Insights ADvisor for OCP GA.

 

Scope:

Specific tasks and priority of them tracked in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CCXDEV-7432

 
 
 
 

 

This contains all the Insights Advisor widget deliverables for the OCP release 4.11.

Scope
It covers only minor bug fixes and improvements:

  • better error handling during internal outages in data processing
  • add "last refresh" timestamp in the Advisor widget
Scenario: Check if the Insights Advisor widget in the OCP WebConsole UI shows the time of the last data analysis
Given: OCP WebConsole UI and the cluster dashboard is accessible
And: CCX external data pipeline is in a working state
And: administrator A1 has access to his cluster's dashboard
And: Insights Operator for this cluster is sending archives
When: administrator A1 clicks on the Insights Advisor widget
Then: the results of the last analysis are showed in the Insights Advisor widget
And: the time of the last analysis is shown in the Insights Advisor widget 

Acceptance criteria:

  1. The time of the last analysis is shown in the Insights Advisor widget for the scenario above
  2. The way it is presented is defined within the scope of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CCXDEV-5869 (mockup task)
  3. The source of this timestamp must be a result of running the Prometheus metric (last archive upload time):
    max_over_time(timestamp(changes(insightsclient_request_send_total\{status_code="202"}[1m]) > 0)[24h:1m])

Show the error message (mocked in CCXDEV-5868) if the Prometheus metrics `cluster_operator_conditions{name="insights"}` contain two true conditions: UploadDegraded and Degraded at the same time. This state occurs if there was an IO archive upload error = problems with the pipeline.

Expected for 4.11 OCP release.

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Epic Goal

  • Allow admin user to create new alerting rules, targeting metrics in any namespace
  • Allow cloning of existing rules to simplify rule creation
  • Allow creation of silences for existing alert rules

Why is this important?

  • Currently, any platform-related metrics (exposed in a openshift-, kube- and default namespace) cannot be used to form a new alerting rule. That makes it very difficult for administrators to enrich our out of the box experience for the OpenShift Container Platform with new rules that may be specific to their environments.
  • Additionally, we had requests from customer to allow modifications of our existing, out of the box alerting rules (for instance tweaking the alert expression or changing the severity label). Unfortunately, that is not easy since most rules come from several open source projects, or other OpenShift components, and any modifications would make a seamless upgrade not really seamless anymore. Imagine K8s changes metrics again (see 1.14) and we have to update our rules. We would not know what modifications have been done (even just the threshold might be difficult if upstream changes that as well) and we would not be able to upgrade these rules.

Scenarios

  • I'd like to modify the query expression of an existing rule (because the threshold value doesn't match with my environment).

Cloning the existing rule should end up with a new rule in the same namespace.
Modifications can now be done to the new rule.
(Optional) You can silence the existing rule.

  • I'd like to create a new rule based on a metric only available to an openshift-* namespace

Create a new PrometheusRule object inside the namespace that includes the metrics you need to form the alerting rule.

  • I'd like to update the label of an existing rule.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Ability to distinguish between rules deployed by us (CMO) and user created rules

Dependencies (internal and external)

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

  1. Distinguish between operator-created rules and user-created rules
    Currently no such mechanism exists. This will need to be added to prometheus-operator or cluster-monitoring-operator.

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

CMO should reconcile the platform Prometheus configuration with the alert-relabel-config resources.

 

DoD

  • Alerts changed via alert-relabel-configs are evaluated by the Platform monitoring stack.
  • Product alerts which are overriden aren't sent to Alertmanager

CMO should reconcile the platform Prometheus configuration with the AlertingRule resources.

 

DoD

  • Alerts added via AlertingRule resources are evaluated by the Platform monitoring stack.

Managing PVs at scale for a fleet creates difficulties where "one size does not fit all". The ability for SRE to deploy prometheus with PVs and have retention based an on a desired size would enable easier management of these volumes across the fleet. 

 

The prometheus-operator exposes retentionSize.

Field Description
retentionSize Maximum amount of disk space used by blocks. Supported units: B, KB, MB, GB, TB, PB, EB. Ex: 512MB.

This is a feature request to enable this configuration option via CMO cluster-monitoring-config ConfigMap.

 

cc Simon Pasquier  

Epic Goal

  • Cluster admins want to configure the retention size for their metrics.

Why is this important?

  • While it is possible to define how long metrics should be retained on disk, it's not possible to tell the cluster monitoring operator how much data it should keep. For OSD/ROSA in particular, it would facilitate the management of the fleet if the retention size could be configured based on the persistent volume size because it would avoid issues with the storage getting full and monitoring being down when too many metrics are produced.

Scenarios

  • As a cluster admin, I want to define the maximum amount of data to be retained on the persistent volume.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • The cluster-monitoring-config config and the user-workload-monitoring-config configmap allow to configure the retention size for
    • Prometheus (Platform and UWM)
    • Thanos Ruler (to be confirmed)
  • Proper validation is in place preventing bad user inputs from breaking the stack.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Thanos ruler doesn't support retention size (only retention time).

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. None

Open questions::

  1. None

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Problem Alignment

The Problem

Today, all configuration for setting individual, for example, routing configuration is done via a single configuration file that only admins have access to. If an environment uses multiple tenants and each tenant, for example, has different systems that they are using to notify teams in case of an issue, then someone needs to file a request w/ an admin to add the required settings.

That can be bothersome for individual teams, since requests like that usually disappear in the backlog of an administrator. At the same time, administrators might get tons of requests that they have to look at and prioritize, which takes them away from more crucial work.

We would like to introduce a more self service approach whereas individual teams can create their own configuration for their needs w/o the administrators involvement.

Last but not least, since Monitoring is deployed as a Core service of OpenShift there are multiple restrictions that the SRE team has to apply to all OSD and ROSA clusters. One restriction is the ability for customers to use the central Alertmanager that is owned and managed by the SRE team. They can't give access to the central managed secret due to security concerns so that users can add their own routing information.

High-Level Approach

Provide a new API (based on the Operator CRD approach) as part of the Prometheus Operator that allows creating a subset of the Alertmanager configuration without touching the central Alertmanager configuration file.

Please note that we do not plan to support additional individual webhooks with this work. Customers will need to deploy their own version of the third party webhooks.

Goal & Success

  • Allow users to deploy individual configurations that allow setting up Alertmanager for their needs without an administrator.

Solution Alignment

Key Capabilities

  • As an OpenShift administrator, I want to control who can CRUD individual configuration so that I can make sure that any unknown third person can touch the central Alertmanager instance shipped within OpenShift Monitoring.
  • As a team owner, I want to deploy a routing configuration to push notifications for alerts to my system of choice.

Key Flows

Team A wants to send all their important notifications to a specific Slack channel.

  • Administrator gives permission to Team A to allow creating a new configuration CR in their individual namespace.
  • Team A creates a new configuration CR.
  • Team A configures what alerts should go into their Slack channel.
  • Open Questions & Key Decisions (optional)
  • Do we want to improve anything inside the developer console to allow configuration?

Epic Goal

  • Allow users to manage Alertmanager for user-defined alerts and have the feature being fully supported.

Why is this important?

  • Users want to configure alert notifications without admin intervention.
  • The feature is currently Tech Preview, it should be generally available to benefit a bigger audience.

Scenarios

  1. As a cluster admin, I can deploy an Alertmanager service dedicated for user-defined alerts (e.g. separated from the existing  Alertmanager already used for platform alerts).
  2. As an application developer, I can silence alerts from the OCP console.
  3. As an application developer, I'm not allowed to configure invalid AlertmanagerConfig objects.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • The AlertmanagerConfig CRD is v1beta1
  • The validating webhook service checking AlertmanagerConfig resources is highly-available.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Prometheus operator upstream should migrate the AlertmanagerConfig CRD from v1alpha1 to v1beta1
  2. Console enhancements likely to be involved (see below).

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. Part of the feature is available as Tech Preview (MON-880).

Open questions:

  1. Coordination with the console team to support the Alertmanager service dedicated for user-defined alerts.
  2. Migration steps for users that are already using the v1alpha1 CRD.

Done Checklist

 * CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
 * Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
 * DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
 * DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
 * DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
 * QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
 * QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
 * DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR> 

 

Now that upstream supports AlertmanagerConfig v1beta1 (see MON-2290 and https://github.com/prometheus-operator/prometheus-operator/pull/4709), it should be deployed by CMO.

DoD:

  • Kubernetes API exposes and supports the v1beta1 version for AlertmanagerConfig CRD (in addition to v1alpha1).
  • Users can manage AlertmanagerConfig v1beta1 objects seamlessly.
  • AlertmanagerConfig v1beta1 objects are reconciled in the generated Alertmanager configuration.
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Epic Goal

  • The goal is to support metrics federation for user-defined monitoring via the /federate Prometheus endpoint (both from within and outside of the cluster).

Why is this important?

  • It is already possible to configure remote write for user-defined monitoring to push metrics outside of the cluster but in some cases, the network flow can only go from the outside to the cluster and not the opposite. This makes it impossible to leverage remote write.
  • It is already possible to use the /federate endpoint for the platform Prometheus (via the internal service or via the OpenShift route) so not supporting for UWM doesn't provide a consistent experience.
  • If we don't expose the /federate endpoint for the UWM Prometheus, users would have no supported way to store and query application metrics from a central location.

Scenarios

  1. As a cluster admin, I want to federate user-defined metrics using the Prometheus /federate endpoint.
  2. As a cluster admin, I want that the /federate endpoint to UWM is accessible via an OpenShift route.
  3. As a cluster admin, I want that the access to the /federate endpoint to UWM requires authentication (with bearer token only) & authorization (the required permissions should match the permissions on the /federate endpoint of the Platform Prometheus).

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Documentation - information about the recommendations and limitations/caveats of the federation approach.
  • User can federate user-defined metrics from within the cluster
  • User can federate user-defined metrics from the outside via the OpenShift route.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. None

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. None

Open questions:

  1. None

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

DoD

  • User can federate UWM metrics from outside of the cluster via the OpenShift route.
  • E2E test added to the CMO test suite.

DoD

  • User can federate UWM metrics within the cluster from the prometheus-user-workload.openshift-user-workload-monitoring.svc:9092 service
  • The service requires authentication via bearer token and authorization (same permissions as for federating platform metrics)

Copy/paste from [_https://github.com/openshift-cs/managed-openshift/issues/60_]

Which service is this feature request for?
OpenShift Dedicated and Red Hat OpenShift Service on AWS

What are you trying to do?
Allow ROSA/OSD to integrate with AWS Managed Prometheus.

Describe the solution you'd like
Remote-write of metrics is supported in OpenShift but it does not work with AWS Managed Prometheus since AWS Managed Prometheus requires AWS SigV4 auth.

  • Note that Prometheus supports AWS SigV4 since v2.26 and OpenShift 4.9 uses v2.29.

Describe alternatives you've considered
There is the workaround to use the "AWS SigV4 Proxy" but I'd think this is not properly supported by RH.
https://mobb.ninja/docs/rosa/cluster-metrics-to-aws-prometheus/

Additional context
The customer wants to use an open and portable solution to centralize metrics storage and analysis. If they also deploy to other clouds, they don't want to have to re-configure. Since most clouds offer a Prometheus service (or it's easy to self-manage Prometheus), app migration should be simplified.

Epic Goal

The cluster monitoring operator should allow OpenShift customers to configure remote write with all authentication methods supported by upstream Prometheus.

We will extend CMO's configuration API to support the following authentications with remote write:

  • Sigv4
  • Authorization
  • OAuth2

Why is this important?

Customers want to send metrics to AWS Managed Prometheus that require sigv4 authentication (see https://docs.aws.amazon.com/prometheus/latest/userguide/AMP-secure-metric-ingestion.html#AMP-secure-auth).

Scenarios

  1. As a cluster admin, I want to forward platform/user metrics to remote write systems requiring Sigv4 authentication.
  2. As a cluster admin, I want to forward platform/user metrics to remote write systems requiring OAuth2 authentication.
  3. As a cluster admin, I want to forward platform/user metrics to remote write systems requiring custom Authorization header for authentication (e.g. API key).

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • It is possible for a cluster admin to configure any authentication method that is supported by Prometheus upstream for remote write (both platform and user-defined metrics):
    • Sigv4
    • Authorization
    • OAuth2

Dependencies (internal and external)

  • In theory none because everything is already supported by the Prometheus operator upstream. We may discover bugs in the upstream implementation though that may require upstream involvement.

Previous Work

  • After CMO started exposing the RemoteWrite specification in MON-1069, additional authentication options where added to prometheus and prometheus-operator but CMO didn't catch up on these.

Open Questions

  • None

Prometheus and Prometheus operator already support sigv4 authentication for remote write. This should be possible to configure the same in the CMO configuration:

 

apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
  name: cluster-monitoring-config
  namespace: openshift-monitoring
data:
  config.yaml: |
    prometheusK8s:
      remoteWrite:
      - url: "https://remote-write.endpoint"
        sigv4:
          accessKey:
            name: aws-credentialss
            key: access
          secretKey:
            name: aws-credentials
            key: secret

          profile: "SomeProfile"

          roleArn: "SomeRoleArn"

DoD:

  • Ability to configure sigv4 authentication for remote write in the openshift-monitoring/cluster-monitoring-config configmap
  • Ability to configure sigv4 authentication for remote write in the openshift-user-workload-monitoring/user-workload-monitoring-config configmap

Prometheus and Prometheus operator already support custom Authorization for remote write. This should be possible to configure the same in the CMO configuration:

 

apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
  name: cluster-monitoring-config
  namespace: openshift-monitoring
data:
  config.yaml: |
    prometheusK8s:
      remoteWrite:
      - url: "https://remote-write.endpoint"
        Authorization:
          type: Bearer
          credentials:
            name: credentials
            key: token

DoD:

  • Ability to configure custom Authorization for remote write in the openshift-monitoring/cluster-monitoring-config configmap
  • Ability to configure custom Authorization for remote write in the openshift-user-workload-monitoring/user-workload-monitoring-config configmap
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Description

As WMCO user, I want to make sure containerd logging information has been updated in documents and scripts.

Acceptance Criteria

  • update must-gather to collect containerd logs
  • Internal/Customer Documents and log collecting scripts must have containerd specific information (ex: location of logs). 

Summary (PM+lead)

Configure audit logging to capture login, logout and login failure details

Motivation (PM+lead)

TODO(PM): update this

Customer who needs login, logout and login failure details inside the openshift container platform.
I have checked for this on my test cluster but the audit logs do not contain any user name specifying login or logout details. For successful logins or logout, on CLI and openshift console as well we can see 'Login successful' or 'Invalid credentials'.

Expected results: Login, logout and login failures should be captured in audit logging.

Goals (lead)

  1. Login, logout and login failures should be captured in audit logs

Non-Goals (lead)

  1. Don't attempt to log login failures in the IdP login flow that goes beyond timeout, if it the information is not available in explicit oauth-server requests (e.g. github password login error).
  2. Logout does not involve oauth-server (but is a simple API object deletion in oauth-apiserver). Hence, the audit log discussed here won't include logout.

Deliverables

  1. Changes to oauth-server to log into /varLog/oauth-server/audit.log on the master node.
  2. Documentation

Proposal (lead)

The apiserver pods today have ´/var/log/<kube|oauth|openshift>-apiserver` mounted from the host and create audit files there using the upstream audit event format (JSON lines following https://github.com/kubernetes/apiserver/blob/92392ef22153d75b3645b0ae339f89c12767fb52/pkg/apis/audit/v1/types.go#L72). These events are apiserver specific, but as oauth authentication flow events are also requests, we can use the apiserver event format to log logins, login failures and logouts. Hence, we propose to make oauth-server to create /var/log/oauth-server/audit.log files on the master nodes using that format.

When the login flow does not finish within a certain time (e.g. 10min), we can artificially create an event to show a login failure in the audit logs.

User Stories (PM)

Dependencies (internal and external, lead)

Previous Work (lead)

Open questions (lead)

  1. ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

 

🏆 What

Let the Cluster Authentication Operator deliver the policy to OAuthServer.

💖 Why

In order to know if authn events should be logged, OAuthServer needs to be aware of it.

🗒 Notes

Create an observer to deliver the audit policy to the oauth server

Make the authentication-operator react to the new audit field in the oauth.config/cluster object. Write an observer watching this field, such an observer will translate the top-level configuration into oauth-server config and add it to the rest of the observed config.

* Stanislav Láznička

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.

Feature Overview.

Early customer feedback is that they see SNO as a great solution covering smaller footprint deployment, but are wondering what is the evolution story OpenShift is going to provide where more capacity or high availability are needed in the future.

While migration tooling (moving workload/config to new cluster) could be a mid-term solution, customer desire is not to include extra hardware to be involved in this process.

 For Telecommunications Providers, at the Far Edge they intend to start small and then grow. Many of these operators will start with a SNO-based DU deployment as an initial investment, but as DUs evolve, different segments of the radio spectrum are added, various radio hardware is provisioned and features delivered to the Far Edge, the Telecommunication Providers desire the ability for their Far Edge deployments to scale up from 1 node to 2 nodes to n nodes. On the opposite side of the spectrum from SNO is MMIMO where there is a robust cluster and workloads use HPA.

Goals

  • Provide the capability to expand a single replica control plane topology to host more workloads capacity - add worker
  • Provide the capability to expand a single replica control plane to be a highly available control plane
  • To satisfy MMIMO Telecommunications providers will want the ability to scale a SNO to a multi-node cluster that can support HPA.
  • Telecommunications providers do not want workload (DU specifically) downtime when migrating from SNO to a multi-node cluster.
  • Telecommunications providers wish to be able to scale from one to two or more nodes to support a variety of radio hardware.
  • Support CP scaling (CP HA) for 2 node cluster, 3 node cluster and n node cluster. As the number of nodes in the cluster increases so does the failure domain of the cluster. The cluster is now supporting more cell sectors and therefore has more of a need for HA and resiliency including the cluster CP.

Requirements

  • TBD
Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section:

  • Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
  • Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
  • ...

Questions to answer…

  • ...

Out of Scope

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

  • ...

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Epic Goal

  • Documented and supported flow for adding 1, 2, 3 or more workers to a Single Node OpenShift (SNO) deployment without requiring cluster downtime and the understanding that this action will not make the cluster itself highly available.

Why is this important?

  • Telecommunications and Edge scenarios where HA is handled via failover to another site but single site capacity may vary or need to be expanded over time.
  • Similar scenarios exist for some ISV vendors where OpenShift is an implementation detail of how they deliver their solution on top of another platform (e.g. VMware).

Scenarios

  1. Adding a worker to a single node openshift cluster.
  2. Adding a second worker to a single node openshift cluster.
  3. Adding a third worker to a single node openshift cluster.
  4. Removing a worker node from a single node openshift cluster that has had 1 or more workers added.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Customer facing documentation of the add worker flow for SNO.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

  1. Presumably there is a scale limit on how many workers could be added to an SNO control plane, and it is lower than the limit for a "normal" 3 node control plane. It is not anticipated that this limit will be established in this epic. Intent is to focus on small scale sites where adding 1-3 worker nodes would be beneficial.

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Rebase OpenShift components to k8s v1.24

Why is this important?

  • Rebasing ensures components work with the upcoming release of Kubernetes
  • Address tech debt related to upstream deprecations and removals.

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. k8s 1.24 release

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Feature Overview

  • As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.
  • As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

  • Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

  • Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
  • Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
  • Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
  • Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
  • In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
  • For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
  • Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
  • The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
  • The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

  • As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
  • As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
  • As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
  • As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
  • As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

  •  

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

  • As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
  • As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

  • This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

  1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
  2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
  3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

 

References

 

 

Epic Goal

  • As an OpenShift infrastructure owner, I need to be able to integrate the installation of my first on-premises OpenShift cluster with my automation flows and tools.
  • As an OpenShift infrastructure owner, I must be able to provide the CLI tool with manifests that contain the definition of the cluster I want to deploy
  • As an OpenShift Infrastructure owner, I must be able to get the validation errors in a programmatic way
  • As an OpenShift Infrastructure owner, I must be able to get the events and progress of the installation in a programmatic way
  • As an OpenShift Infrastructure owner, I must be able to retrieve the kubeconfig and OpenShift Console URL in a programmatic way

Why is this important?

  • When deploying clusters with a large number of hosts and when deploying many clusters, it is common to require to automate the installations.
  • Customers and partners usually use third party tools of their own to orchestrate the installation.
  • For Telco RAN deployments, Telco partners need to repeatably deploy multiple OpenShift clusters in parallel to multiple sites at-scale, with no human intervention.

Scenarios

  1. Monitoring flow:
    1. I generate all the manifests for the cluster,
    2. call the CLI tool pointint to the manifests path,
    3. Obtain the installation image from the nodes
    4. Use my infrastructure capabilities to boot the image on the target nodes
    5. Use the tool to connect to assisted service to get validation status and events
    6. Use the tool to retrieve credentials and URL for the deployed cluster

Acceptance Criteria

  • Backward compatibility between OCP releases with automation manifests (they can be applied to a newer version of OCP).
  • Installation progress and events can be tracked programatically
  • Validation errors can be obtained programatically
  • Kubeconfig and console URL can be obtained programatically
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

References

User Story:

As a deployer, I want to be able to:

  • Get the credentials for the cluster that is going to be deployed

so that I can achieve

  • Checking the installed cluster for installation completion
  • Connect and administer the cluster that gets installed

 

Currently the Assisted Service generates the credentials by running the ignition generation step of the oepnshift-installer. This is why the credentials are only retrievable from the REST API towards the end of the installation.

In the BILLI usage, which takes down assisted service before the installation is complete there is no obvious point at which to alert the user that they should retrieve the credentials. This means that we either need to:

  • Allow the user to pass the admin key that will then get signed by the generated CA and replace the key that is made by openshift-installer (would mean new functionality in AI)
  • Allow the key to be retrieved by SSH with the fleeting command from the node0 (after it has generated). The command should be able to wait until it is possible
  • Have the possibility to POST it somewhere

Acceptance Criteria:

  • The admin key is generated and usable to check for installation completeness

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

Feature Overview

The AWS-specific code added in OCPPLAN-6006 needs to become GA and with this we want to introduce a couple of Day2 improvements.
Currently the AWS tags are defined and applied at installation time only and saved in the infrastructure CRD's status field for further operator use, which in turn just add the tags during creation.

Saving in the status field means it's not included in Velero backups, which is a crucial feature for customers and Day2.
Thus the status.resourceTags field should be deprecated in favour of a newly created spec.resourceTags with the same content. The installer should only populate the spec, consumers of the infrastructure CRD must favour the spec over the status definition if both are supplied, otherwise the status should be honored and a warning shall be issued.

Being part of the spec, the behaviour should also tag existing resources that do not have the tags yet and once the tags in the infrastructure CRD are changed all the AWS resources should be updated accordingly.

On AWS this can be done without re-creating any resources (the behaviour is basically an upsert by tag key) and is possible without service interruption as it is a metadata operation.

Tag deletes continue to be out of scope, as the customer can still have custom tags applied to the resources that we do not want to delete.

Due to the ongoing intree/out of tree split on the cloud and CSI providers, this should not apply to clusters with intree providers (!= "external").

Once confident we have all components updated, we should introduce an end2end test that makes sure we never create resources that are untagged.

After that, we can remove the experimental flag and make this a GA feature.

Goals

  • Inclusion in the cluster backups
  • Flexibility of changing tags during cluster lifetime, without recreating the whole cluster

Requirements

  • This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.
Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

List any affected packages or components.

  • Installer
  • Cluster Infrastructure
  • Storage
  • Node
  • NetworkEdge
  • Internal Registry
  • CCO

RFE-1101 described user defined tags for AWS resources provisioned by an OCP cluster. Currently user can define tags which are added to the resources during creation. These tags cannot be updated subsequently. The propagation of the tags is controlled using experimental flag. Before this feature goes GA we should define and implement a mechanism to exclude any experimental flags. Day2 operations and deletion of tags is not in the scope.

RFE-2012 aims to make the user-defined resource tags feature GA. This means that user defined tags should be updatable.

Currently the user-defined tags during install are passed directly as parameters of the Machine and Machineset resources for the master and worker. As a result these tags cannot be updated by consulting the Infrastructure resource of the cluster where the user defined tags are written.

The MCO should be changed such that during provisioning the MCO looks up the values of the tags in the Infrastructure resource and adds the tags during creation of the EC2 resources. The MCO should also watch the infrastructure resource for changes and when the resource tags are updated it should update the tags on the EC2 instances without restarts.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • e2e test where the ResourceTags are updated and then the test verifies that the tags on the ec2 instances are updated without restarts. now moved to CFE-179

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.
<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Feature --->
<--- Remove the descriptive text as appropriate --->

Feature Overview

  • As RH OpenShift Product Owners, we want to enable new providers/platforms/service with varying levels of capabilities and integration with minimal reliance on OpenShift Engineering.
  • As a new provider/platform partner, I want to enable my solution (hardware and/or software) with OpenShift with minimal effort.

 

Problem

  • It is currently challenging for us to enable new platforms / providers without taking the heavy burden on doing the platform specific development ourselves.

Goals

  • We want to enable the long-tail new platforms/providers to expand our reach into new markets and/or support new use cases.
  • We want to remove strict dependencies we have on Engineering teams to review, support and test new providers.
  • We want to lower the effort required for onboarding new platforms/providers.
  • We want to enable new platform/providers to self-certify.
  • We want to define tiered model for provider/platform integration that delineates ownership and responsibilities throughout new provider/platform development lifecycle and support model.
  • We want to reduce time to onboard new provider/platform – ideally to a single release.
  • We want to maintain consistent customer experience across all providers/platforms.

Requirements

  • Step-by-step guide on how to add a new platform/provider for each tier
  • Certification tool for partner to self-certify
  • Certification tool results for (at least) each Y/minor release submitted by partner to Red Hat for acknowledgement
  • DCI program to enable partners to run CI with OpenShift on their platform
  • Well documented, accessible, and up-to-date test suites for providing the test coverage of the partner
  • CI includes upgrade testing of OpenShift with partner's components
  • Partner component upgrade failure should not block OpenShift upgrade
  • Partner code is available in repositories in the openshift org on github with an open source license compatible with OpenShift

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section:

  • Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
  • Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
  • ...

Questions to answer…

  • ...

Out of Scope

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

  • ...

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

 

References

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Running the OPCT with the latest version (v0.1.0) on OCP 4.11.0, the openshift-tests is reporting an incorrect counter for the "total" field.

In the example below, after the 1127th test, the total follows the same counter of executed. I also would assume that the total is incorrect before that point as the test continues the execution increases both counters.

 

openshift-tests output format: [failed/executed/total]

started: (0/1126/1127) "[sig-storage] PersistentVolumes-expansion  loopback local block volume should support online expansion on node [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]"

passed: (38s) 2022-08-09T17:12:21 "[sig-storage] In-tree Volumes [Driver: nfs] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (default fs)] provisioning should provision storage with mount options [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]"

started: (0/1127/1127) "[sig-storage] In-tree Volumes [Driver: local][LocalVolumeType: tmpfs] [Testpattern: Generic Ephemeral-volume (block volmode) (late-binding)] ephemeral should support two pods which have the same volume definition [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]"

passed: (6.6s) 2022-08-09T17:12:21 "[sig-storage] Downward API volume should provide container's memory request [NodeConformance] [Conformance] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel/minimal] [Suite:k8s]"

started: (0/1128/1128) "[sig-storage] In-tree Volumes [Driver: cinder] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (immediate binding)] topology should fail to schedule a pod which has topologies that conflict with AllowedTopologies [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]"

skip [k8s.io/kubernetes@v1.24.0/test/e2e/storage/framework/testsuite.go:116]: Driver local doesn't support GenericEphemeralVolume -- skipping
Ginkgo exit error 3: exit with code 3

skipped: (400ms) 2022-08-09T17:12:21 "[sig-storage] In-tree Volumes [Driver: local][LocalVolumeType: tmpfs] [Testpattern: Generic Ephemeral-volume (block volmode) (late-binding)] ephemeral should support two pods which have the same volume definition [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]"

started: (0/1129/1129) "[sig-storage] In-tree Volumes [Driver: emptydir] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (default fs)] capacity provides storage capacity information [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]" 

 

OPCT output format [executed/total (failed failures)]

Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:12:13 -03> Global Status: running
JOB_NAME                         | STATUS     | RESULTS    | PROGRESS                  | MESSAGE                                           
openshift-conformance-validated  | running    |            | 1112/1127 (0 failures)    | status=running                                    
openshift-kube-conformance       | complete   |            | 352/352 (0 failures)      | waiting for post-processor...                     
Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:12:23 -03> Global Status: running
JOB_NAME                         | STATUS     | RESULTS    | PROGRESS                  | MESSAGE                                           
openshift-conformance-validated  | running    |            | 1120/1127 (0 failures)    | status=running                                    
openshift-kube-conformance       | complete   |            | 352/352 (0 failures)      | waiting for post-processor...                     
Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:12:33 -03> Global Status: running
JOB_NAME                         | STATUS     | RESULTS    | PROGRESS                  | MESSAGE                                           
openshift-conformance-validated  | running    |            | 1139/1139 (0 failures)    | status=running                                    
openshift-kube-conformance       | complete   |            | 352/352 (0 failures)      | waiting for post-processor...                     
Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:12:43 -03> Global Status: running
JOB_NAME                         | STATUS     | RESULTS    | PROGRESS                  | MESSAGE                                           
openshift-conformance-validated  | running    |            | 1185/1185 (0 failures)    | status=running                                    
openshift-kube-conformance       | complete   |            | 352/352 (0 failures)      | waiting for post-processor...                     
Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:12:53 -03> Global Status: running
JOB_NAME                         | STATUS     | RESULTS    | PROGRESS                  | MESSAGE                                           
openshift-conformance-validated  | running    |            | 1188/1188 (0 failures)    | status=running                                    
openshift-kube-conformance       | complete   |            | 352/352 (0 failures)      | waiting for post-processor...      

 

 

 

 

Goal

Increase integration of Shipwright, Tekton, Argo CD in OpenShift GitOps with OpenShift platform and related products such as ACM.

Incomplete Features

When this image was assembled, these features were not yet completed. Therefore, only the Jira Cards included here are part of this release

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

  • Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
  • Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

  • Core Networking Stability
  • Core Networking Performance and Scale
  • Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
  • Core Networking UX (Observability)
  • Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

  • Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
  • SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
  • Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

  • CNV
  • Service Mesh
  • CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Create a PR in openshift/cluster-ingress-operator to implement configurable router probe timeouts.

The PR should include the following:

  • Changes to the ingress operator's ingress controller to allow the user to configure the readiness and liveness probe's timeoutSeconds values.
  • Changes to existing unit tests to verify that the new functionality works properly.
  • Write E2E test to verify that the new functionality works properly.
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

User Story: As a customer in a highly regulated environment, I need the ability to secure DNS traffic when forwarding requests to upstream resolvers so that I can ensure additional DNS traffic and data privacy.

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

  1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
  2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
  3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.


Relevant links:

Per the 4.6.30 Monitoring DNS Post Mortem, we should add E2E tests to openshift/cluster-dns-operator to reduce the risk that changes to our CoreDNS configuration break DNS resolution for clients.  

To begin with, we add E2E DNS testing for 2 or 3 client libraries to establish a framework for testing DNS resolvers; the work of adding additional client libraries to this framework can be left for follow-up stories.  Two common libraries are Go's resolver and glibc's resolver.  A somewhat common library that is known to have quirks is musl libc's resolver, which uses a shorter timeout value than glibc's resolver and reportedly has issues with the EDNS0 protocol extension.  It would also make sense to test Java or other popular languages or runtimes that have their own resolvers. 

Additionally, as talked about in our DNS Issue Retro & Testing Coverage meeting on Feb 28th 2024, we also decided to add a test for testing a non-EDNS0 query for a larger than 512 byte record, as once was an issue in bug OCPBUGS-27397.   

The ultimate goal is that the test will inform us when a change to OpenShift's DNS or networking has an effect that may impact end-user applications. 

In OCP 4.8 the router was changed to use the "random" balancing algorithm for non-passthrough routes by default. It was previously "leastconn".

Bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007581 shows that using "random" by default incurs significant memory overhead for each backend that uses it.

PR https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pull/663
reverted the change and made "leastconn" the default again (OCP 4.8 onwards).

The analysis in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007581#c40 shows that the default haproxy behaviour is to multiply the weight (specified in the route CR) by 16 as it builds its data structures for each backend. If no weight is specified then openshift-router sets the weight to 256. If you have many, many thousands of routes then this balloons quickly and leads to a significant increase in memory usage, as highlighted by customer cases attached to BZ#2007581.

The purpose of this issue is to both explore changing the openshift-router default weight (i.e., 256) to something smaller, or indeed unset (assuming no explicit weight has been requested), and to measure the memory usage within the context of the existing perf&scale tests that we use for vetting new haproxy releases.

It may be that the low-hanging change is to not default to weight=256 for backends that only have one pod replica (i.e., if no value specified, and there is only 1 pod replica, then don't default to 256 for that single server entry).

Outcome: does changing the [default] weight value make it feasible to switch back to "random" as the default balancing algorithm for a future OCP release.

Revert router to using "random" once again in 4.11 once analysis is done on impact of weight and static memory allocation.

Feature Overview

  • This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary
  • Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

 

Goals

  • This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature

 

Requirements

  • This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

 

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

  • Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
  • Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
  • ...

 

Questions to answer…

  • ...

 

Out of Scope

 

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

 

Assumptions

  • ...

 

Customer Considerations

  • ...

 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?  
  • New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

When viewing the Installed Operators list set to 'All projects' and then selecting an operator that is available in 'All namespaces' (globally installed,) upon clicking the operator to view its details the user is taken into the details of that operator in installed namespace (project selector will switch to the install namespace.)

This can be disorienting then to look at the lists of custom resource instances and see them all blank, since the lists are showing instances only in the currently selected project (the install namespace) and not across all namespaces the operator is available in.

It is likely that making use of the new Operator resource will improve this experience (CONSOLE-2240,) though that may still be some releases away. it should be considered if it's worth a "short term" fix in the meantime.

Note: The informational alert was not implemented. It was decided that since "All namespaces" is displayed in the radio button, the alert was not needed.

Goal
Add support for PDB (Pod Disruption Budget) to the console.

Requirements:

  • Add a list, detail, and yaml view (with samples) for PDBs. In addition, update the workloads page to support PDBs as well.
  • For the PBD list page include a table with name, namespace, selector, availability, allowed disruptions and created. In addition, to the table provide the main call to action to create a PDB.
  • For the PDB details page provide a Details, YAML and Pods tab. The Pods tab will include a list pods associated with the PBD - make sure to surface the owner column.
  • When users create a PDB from the list page, take them to the YAML and provide samples to enhance the creation experience. Sample 1: Set max unavailable to 0, Sample 2: Set min unavailable to 25% (confirming samples with stakeholders). In the case that a PDB has already been applied, warn users that it is not recommended to add another. Cover use cases as well that keep users from creating poor policies - for example, setting the minimum available to zero.
  • Add the ability to add/edit/view PBDs on a workload. If we edit a PDB applied to multiple workloads, warn users that this change will affect all workloads and not only the one they are currently editing. When a PDB has been applied, add a new filed to the details page with a link to the PDB and policy.

Designs:

Samuel Padgett Colleen Hart

During master nodes upgrade when nodes are getting drained there's currently no protection from two or more operands going down. If your component is required to be available during upgrade or other voluntary disruptions, please consider deploying PDB to protect your operands.

The effort is tracked in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WRKLDS-293.

Example:

 

Acceptance Criteria:
1. Create PDB controller in console-operator for both console and downloads pods
2. Add e2e tests for PDB in single node and multi node cluster

 

Note: We should consider to backport this to 4.10

Feature Overview  

Much like core OpenShift operators, a standardized flow exists for OLM-managed operators to interact with the cluster in a specific way to leverage AWS STS authorization when using AWS APIs as opposed to insecure static, long-lived credentials. OLM-managed operators can implement integration with the CloudCredentialOperator in well-defined way to support this flow.

Goals:

Enable customers to easily leverage OpenShift's capabilities around AWS STS with layered products, for increased security posture. Enable OLM-managed operators to implement support for this in well-defined pattern.

Requirements:

  • CCO gets a new mode in which it can reconcile STS credential request for OLM-managed operators
  • A standardized flow is leveraged to guide users in discovering and preparing their AWS IAM policies and roles with permissions that are required for OLM-managed operators 
  • A standardized flow is defined in which users can configure OLM-managed operators to leverage AWS STS
  • An example operator is used to demonstrate the end2end functionality
  • Clear instructions and documentation for operator development teams to implement the required interaction with the CloudCredentialOperator to support this flow

Use Cases:

See Operators & STS slide deck.

 

Out of Scope:

  • handling OLM-managed operator updates in which AWS IAM permission requirements might change from one version to another (which requires user awareness and intervention)

 

Background:

The CloudCredentialsOperator already provides a powerful API for OpenShift's cluster core operator to request credentials and acquire them via short-lived tokens. This capability should be expanded to OLM-managed operators, specifically to Red Hat layered products that interact with AWS APIs. The process today is cumbersome to none-existent based on the operator in question and seen as an adoption blocker of OpenShift on AWS.

 

Customer Considerations

This is particularly important for ROSA customers. Customers are expected to be asked to pre-create the required IAM roles outside of OpenShift, which is deemed acceptable.

Documentation Considerations

  • Internal documentation needs to exists to guide Red Hat operator developer teams on the requirements and proposed implementation of integration with CCO and the proposed flow
  • External documentation needs to exist to guide users on:
    • how to become aware that the cluster is in STS mode
    • how to become aware of operators that support STS and the proposed CCO flow
    • how to become aware of the IAM permissions requirements of these operators
    • how to configure an operator in the proposed flow to interact with CCO

Interoperability Considerations

  • this needs to work with ROSA
  • this needs to work with self-managed OCP on AWS

Market Problem

This Section: High-Level description of the Market Problem ie: Executive Summary

  • As a customer of OpenShift layered products, I need to be able to fluidly, reliably and consistently install and use OpenShift layered product Kubernetes Operators into my ROSA STS clusters, while keeping a STS workflow throughout.
  •  
  • As a customer of OpenShift on the big cloud providers, overall I expect OpenShift as a platform to function equally well with tokenized cloud auth as it does with "mint-mode" IAM credentials. I expect the same from the Kubernetes Operators under the Red Hat brand (that need to reach cloud APIs) in that tokenized workflows are equally integrated and workable as with "mint-mode" IAM credentials.
  •  
  • As the managed services, including Hypershift teams, offering a downstream opinionated, supported and managed lifecycle of OpenShift (in the forms of ROSA, ARO, OSD on GCP, Hypershift, etc), the OpenShift platform should have as close as possible, native integration with core platform operators when clusters use tokenized cloud auth, driving the use of layered products.
  • .
  • As the Hypershift team, where the only credential mode for clusters/customers is STS (on AWS) , the Red Hat branded Operators that must reach the AWS API, should be enabled to work with STS credentials in a consistent, and automated fashion that allows customer to use those operators as easily as possible, driving the use of layered products.

Why it Matters

  • Adding consistent, automated layered product integrations to OpenShift would provide great added value to OpenShift as a platform, and its downstream offerings in Managed Cloud Services and related offerings.
  • Enabling Kuberenetes Operators (at first, Red Hat ones) on OpenShift for the "big3" cloud providers is a key differentiation and security requirement that our customers have been and continue to demand.
  • HyperShift is an STS-only architecture, which means that if our layered offerings via Operators cannot easily work with STS, then it would be blocking us from our broad product adoption goals.

Illustrative User Stories or Scenarios

  1. Main success scenario - high-level user story
    1. customer creates a ROSA STS or Hypershift cluster (AWS)
    2. customer wants basic (table-stakes) features such as AWS EFS or RHODS or Logging
    3. customer sees necessary tasks for preparing for the operator in OperatorHub from their cluster
    4. customer prepares AWS IAM/STS roles/policies in anticipation of the Operator they want, using what they get from OperatorHub
    5. customer's provides a very minimal set of parameters (AWS ARN of role(s) with policy) to the Operator's OperatorHub page
    6. The cluster can automatically setup the Operator, using the provided tokenized credentials and the Operator functions as expected
    7. Cluster and Operator upgrades are taken into account and automated
    8. The above steps 1-7 should apply similarly for Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure Cloud, with their respective token-based workload identity systems.
  2. Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
    1. The same as above, but the ROSA CLI would assist with AWS role/policy management
    2. The same as above, but the oc CLI would assist with cloud role/policy management (per respective cloud provider for the cluster)
  3. ...

Expected Outcomes

This Section: Articulates and defines the value proposition from a users point of view

  • See SDE-1868 as an example of what is needed, including design proposed, for current-day ROSA STS and by extension Hypershift.
  • Further research is required to accomodate the AWS STS equivalent systems of GCP and Azure
  • Order of priority at this time is
    • 1. AWS STS for ROSA and ROSA via HyperShift
    • 2. Microsoft Azure for ARO
    • 3. Google Cloud for OpenShift Dedicated on GCP

Effect

This Section: Effect is the expected outcome within the market. There are two dimensions of outcomes; growth or retention. This represents part of the “why” statement for a feature.

  • Growth is the acquisition of net new usage of the platform. This can be new workloads not previously able to be supported, new markets not previously considered, or new end users not previously served.
  • Retention is maintaining and expanding existing use of the platform. This can be more effective use of tools, competitive pressures, and ease of use improvements.
  • Both of growth and retention are the effect of this effort.
    • Customers have strict requirements around using only token-based cloud credential systems for workloads in their cloud accounts, which include OpenShift clusters in all forms.
      • We gain new customers from both those that have waited for token-based auth/auth from OpenShift and from those that are new to OpenShift, with strict requirements around cloud account access
      • We retain customers that are going thru both cloud-native and hybrid-cloud journeys that all inevitably see security requirements driving them towards token-based auth/auth.
      •  

References

As an engineer I want the capability to implement CI test cases that run at different intervals, be it daily, weekly so as to ensure downstream operators that are dependent on certain capabilities are not negatively impacted if changes in systems CCO interacts with change behavior.

Acceptance Criteria:

Create a stubbed out e2e test path in CCO and matching e2e calling code in release such that there exists a path to tests that verify working in an AWS STS workflow.

Feature Overview

Customers are asking for improvements to the upgrade experience (both over-the-air and disconnected). This is a feature tracking epics required to get that work done.  

Goals

  1. Have an option to do upgrades in more discrete steps under admin control. Specifically, these steps are: 
    • Control plane upgrade
    • Worker nodes upgrade
    • Workload enabling upgrade (i..e. Router, other components) or infra nodes
  2. Better visibility into any errors during the upgrades and documentation of what they error means and how to recover. 
  3. An user experience around an end-2-end back-up and restore after a failed upgrade 
  4. OTA-810  - Better Documentation: 
    • Backup procedures before upgrades. 
    • More control over worker upgrades (with tagged pools between user Vs admin)
    • The kinds of pre-upgrade tests that are run, the errors that are flagged and what they mean and how to address them. 
    • Better explanation of each discrete step in upgrades, and what each CVO Operator is doing and potential errors, troubleshooting and mitigating actions.

References

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Provide a one click option to perform an upgrade which pauses all non master pools

Why is this important?

  • Customers are increasingly asking that the overall upgrade is broken up into more digestible pieces
  • This is the limit of what's possible today
    • R&D work will be done in the future to allow for further bucketing of upgrades into Control Plane, Worker Nodes, and Workload Enabling components (ie: router) That will however take much more consideration and rearchitecting

Scenarios

  1. An admin selecting their upgrade is offered two options "Upgrade Cluster" and "Upgrade Control Plane"
    1. If the admin selects Upgrade Cluster they get the pre 4.10 behavior
    2. If the admin selects Upgrade Control Plane all non master pools are paused and an upgrade is initiated
  1. A tooltip should clarify what the difference between the two are
  2. The pool progress bars should indicate pause/unpaused status, non master pools should allow for unpausing

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. While this epic doesn't specifically target upgrading from 4.N to 4.N+1 to 4.N+2 with non master pools paused it would fundamentally enable that and it would simplify the UX described in Paused Worker Pool Upgrades

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Goal
Add the ability to choose between a full cluster upgrade (which exists today) or control plane upgrade (which will pause all worker pools) in the console.

Background
Currently in the console, users only have the ability to complete a full cluster upgrade. For many customers, upgrades take longer than what their maintenance window allows. Users need the ability to upgrade the control plane independently of the other worker nodes. 

Ex. Upgrades of huge clusters may take too long so admins may do the control plane this weekend, worker-pool-A next weekend, worker-pool-B the weekend after, etc.  It is all at a pool level, they will not be able to choose specific hosts.

Requirements

  1. Changes to the Update modal:
    1. Add the ability to choose between a cluster upgrade and a control plane upgrade (the design does not default to a selection but rather disables the update button to force the user to make a conscious decision)
    2. link out to documentation to learn more about update strategies
  2. Changes to the in progress check list:
    1. Add a status above the worker pool section to let users know that all worker pools are paused and an action to resume all updates
    2. Add a "resume update" button for each worker pool entry
  3. Changes to the update status:
    1. When all master pools are updated successfully, change the status from what we have today "Up to date" to something like "Control plane up to date - all worker pools paused"
  4. Add an inline alert that lets users know there is a 60 day window to update all worker pools. In the alert, include the sentiment that worker pools can remain paused as long as is normally safe, which means until certificate rotation becomes critical which is at about 60 days. The admin would be advised to unpause them in order to complete the full upgrade. If the MCPs are paused, the certification rotation does not happen, which causes the cluster to become degraded and causes failure in multiple 'oc' commands, including but not limited to 'oc debug', 'oc logs', 'oc exec' and 'oc attach'. (Are we missing anything else here?) Inline alert logic:
    1. From day 60 to day 10 use the default alert.
    2. From day 10 to day 3 use the warning alert.
    3. From day 3 to 0 use the critical alert and continue to persist until resolved.

Design deliverables: 

Goal
Improve the UX on the machine config pool page to reflect the new enhancements on the cluster settings that allows users to select the ability to update the control plane only.

Background
Currently in the console, users only have the ability to complete a full cluster upgrade. For many customers, upgrades take longer than what their maintenance window allows. Users need the ability to upgrade the control plane independently of the other worker nodes. 

Ex. Upgrades of huge clusters may take too long so admins may do the control plane this weekend, worker-pool-A next weekend, worker-pool-B the weekend after, etc.  It is all at a pool level, they will not be able to choose specific hosts.

Requirements

  1. Changes to the table:
    1. Remove "Updated, updating and paused" columns. We could also consider adding column management to this table and hide those columns by default.
    2. Add "Update status" as a column, and surface the same status on cluster settings. Not true or false values but instead updating, paused, and up to date.
    3. Surface the update action in the table row.
  2. Add an inline alert that lets users know there is a 60 day window to update all worker pools. In the alert, include the sentiment that worker pools can remain paused as long as is normally safe, which means until certificate rotation becomes critical which is at about 60 days. The admin would be advised to unpause them in order to complete the full upgrade. If the MCPs are paused, the certification rotation does not happen, which causes the cluster to become degraded and causes failure in multiple 'oc' commands, including but not limited to 'oc debug', 'oc logs', 'oc exec' and 'oc attach'. (Are we missing anything else here?) Add the same alert logic to this page as the cluster settings:
    1. From day 60 to day 10 use the default inline alert.
    2. From day 10 to day 3 use the warning inline alert.
    3. From day 3 to 0 use the critical alert and continue to persist until resolved.

Design deliverables: 

Feature Overview

Enable sharing ConfigMap and Secret across namespaces

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Secrets and ConfigMaps can get shared across namespaces   YES

Questions to answer…

NA

Out of Scope

NA

Background, and strategic fit

Consumption of RHEL entitlements has been a challenge on OCP 4 since it moved to a cluster-based entitlement model compared to the node-based (RHEL subscription manager) entitlement mode. In order to provide a sufficiently similar experience to OCP 3, the entitlement certificates that are made available on the cluster (OCPBU-93) should be shared across namespaces in order to prevent the need for cluster admin to copy these entitlements in each namespace which leads to additional operational challenges for updating and refreshing them. 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:
 * What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
 * Does this feature have doc impact?
 * New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
 * If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
 * What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
 * How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
 * What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
 * Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
 * What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Require volumes that use the Shared Resources CSI driver to specify readOnly: true in order to create the pod
  • Reserve the "openshift-" prefix for SharedSecrets and SharedConfigMaps, such that these resources can only be created by OpenShift operators. We must do this while the driver is tech preview.

Why is this important?

  • readOnly: true must be specified in order for the driver to mount the volume correctly. If this is not set, the volume mount is rejected and the pod will be stuck in a Pending/Initializing state.
  • A validating admission webhook will ensure that the pods won't be created in such a state, improving user experience.
  • Openshift operators may want/need to create SharedSecrets and SharedConfigMaps so they can be used as system level resources. For example, Insights Operator can automatically create a SharedSecret for the Simple Content Access cert.

Scenarios

  1. As a developer, I want to consume shared Secrets and ConfigMaps in my workloads so that I can have access to shared credentials and configuration.
  2. As a cluster admin, I want the Insights operator to automatically create a SharedSecret for my cluster's simple content access certificate.
  3. As a cluster admin/SRE, I want OpenShift to use SharedConfigMaps to distribute cluster certificate authorities so that data is not duplicated in ConfigMaps across my cluster.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Pods must have readOnly: true set to use the shared resource CSI Driver - admission should be rejected if this is not set.
  • Documentation updated to reflect this requirement.
  • Users (admins?) are not allowed to create SharedSecrets or SharedConfigMaps with the "openshift-" prefix.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ART - to create payload image for the webhook
  2. Arch review for the enhancement proposal (Apiserver/control plane team)

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. BUILD-293 - Shared Resources tech preview

Open questions::

  1. From email exchange with David Eads:  "Thinking ahead to how we'd like to use this in builds once we're GA, are we likely to choose openshift-etc-pki-entitlement as one of our well-known names?  If we do, what sort of validation (if any) would we like to provide on the backing secret and does that require any new infrastructure?"

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As an OpenShift engineer
I want the shared resource CSI Driver webhook to be installed with the cluster storage operator
So that the webhook is deployed when the CSI driver is deployed

Acceptance Criteria

  • Shared Resource CSI Driver operator deploys the webhook alongside the CSI driver
  • Cluster storage operator is updated if needed to deploy the shared resource CSI driver webhook.

Docs Impact

None - no new functional capabilities will be added

QE Impact

None - we can verify in CI that we are deploying the webhook correctly.

PX Impact

None - no new functional capabilities will be added

Notes

The scope of this story is to just deploy the "hello world" webhook with the Cluster Storage Operator.
Adding the live ValidatingWebhook configuration and service will be done in a separate story.

User Story

As an OpenShift engineer,
I want to initialize a validating admission webhook for the shared resource CSI driver
So that I can eventually require readOnly: true to be set on all pods that use the Shared Resource CSI Driver

Acceptance Criteria

  • Container image created in CI which builds a "hello world" binary for the future validating webhook.
  • ART sets up downstream build process for the image.

QE Impact

None.

Docs Impact

None.

PX Impact

None.

Notes

This is a prerequisite for implementing the validating admission webhook.
We need to have ART build the container image downstream so that we can add the correct image references for the CVO.
If we reference images in the CVO manifests which do not have downstream counterparts, we break the downstream build for the payload.

CI is capable of producing multiple images for a GitHub repository. For example, github.com/openshift/oc produces 4-5 images with various capabilities.

We did similar work in BUILD-234 - some of these steps are not required.

See also:

User Story

As a developer using SharedSecrets and ConfigMaps
I want to ensure all pods set readOnly; true on admission
So that I don't have pods stuck in the "Pending" state because of a bad volume mount

Acceptance Criteria

  • Pods which reference the Shared Resource CSI driver must set readOnly: true on admission.
  • If readOnly: true is not set, or is set to false, the pod should not be created.
  • Appropriate testing in place to verify behavior

QE Impact

QE will need to verify the new Pod Admission behavior

Docs Impact

Docs will need to ensure that readOnly: true is required and must be set to true.

PX Impact

None.

QE testing/verification of the feature - require readOnly to be true

Actions:

1. Create smoke test and submit to GitHub
2. Run script to integrate smoke test with Polarion

Complete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were completed when this image was assembled

Summary (PM+lead)

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AUTH-2 revealed that, in prinicipal, Pod Security Admission is possible to integrate into OpenShift while retaining SCC functionality.

 

This epic is about the concrete steps to enable Pod Security Admission by default in OpenShift

Motivation (PM+lead)

Goals (lead)

  • Enable Pod Security Admission in "restricted" policy level by default
  • Migrate existing core workloads to comply to the "restricted" pod security policy level

Non-Goals (lead)

  • Other OpenShift workloads must be migrated by the individual responsible teams.

Deliverables

Proposal (lead)

Enhancement - https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1010

User Stories (PM)

Dependencies (internal and external, lead)

Previous Work (lead)

Open questions (lead)

  1. ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

ingress-operator must comply to pod security. The current audit warning is:

 

{   "objectRef": "openshift-ingress-operator/deployments/ingress-operator",   "pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit-violations": "would violate PodSecurity \"restricted:latest\": allowPrivilegeEscalation != false (containers \"ingress-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation=false), unrestricted capabilities (containers \"ingress-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.capabilities.drop=[\"ALL\"]), runAsNonRoot != true (pod or containers \"ingress-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.run AsNonRoot=true), seccompProfile (pod or containers \"ingress-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.seccompProfile.type to \"RuntimeDefault\" or \"Localhost\")" }

dns-operator must comply to restricted pod security level. The current audit warning is:

{   "objectRef": "openshift-dns-operator/deployments/dns-operator",   "pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit-violations": "would violate PodSecurity \"restricted:latest\": allowPrivilegeEscalation != false (containers \"dns-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation=false), unre stricted capabilities (containers \"dns-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.capabilities.drop=[\"ALL\"]), runAsNonRoot != true (pod or containers \"dns-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.runAsNonRoot=tr ue), seccompProfile (pod or containers \"dns-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.seccompProfile.type to \"RuntimeDefault\" or \"Localhost\")" }

Epic Goal

HyperShift provisions OpenShift clusters with externally managed control-planes. It follows a slightly different process for provisioning clusters. For example, HyperShift uses cluster API as a backend and moves all the machine management bits to the management cluster.  

Why is this important?

showing machine management/cluster auto-scaling tabs in the console is likely to confuse users and cause unnecessary side effects. 

Definition of Done

  • MachineConfig and MachineConfigPool should not be present, they should be either removed or hidden when the cluster is spawned using HyperShift. 
  • Cluster Settings show say the control plane is externally managed and be read-only.
  • Cluster Settings -> Configuration resources should be read-only, maybe hide the tab
  • Some resources should go in an allowlist. Most will be hidden
  • Review getting started steps

See Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k76JtRRHBdCCEjHPqKcYvbNVsuaGmRhWDLESWIm0mbo/edit#

 

Setup / Testing

It's based on the SERVER_FLAG controlPlaneTopology being set to External is really the driving factor here; this can be done in one of two ways:

  • Locally via a Bridge Variable, export BRIDGE_CONTROL_PLANE_TOPOLOGY_MODE="External"
  • Locally / OnCluster via modifying the window.SERVER_FLAGS.controlPlaneTopology to External in the dev tools

To test work related to cluster upgrade process, use a 4.10.3 cluster set on the candidate-4.10 upgrade channel using 4.11 frontend code.

If the Infrastructure.Status.ControlPlaneTopology is set to 'External', the console-operator will pass this information via the console-config.yaml co the console. Console pod will get re-deployed and will store the topology mode information as a SERVER_FLAG. Based on that value we need to remove the ability to “Add identity providers” under “Set up your Cluster”. In addition to the getting started card, we should remove the ability to update a cluster on the details card when applicable (anything that changes a cluster version should be read only).

Summary of changes to the overview page:

  • Remove the ability to “Add identify providers” under “Set up your Cluster”
  • Remove cluster update CTA from the details card
  • Remove update alerts from the status card

Check section 03 for more info: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k76JtRRHBdCCEjHPqKcYvbNVsuaGmRhWDLESWIm0mbo/edit#

Based on Cesar's comment we should be removing the `Control Plane` section, if the infrastructure.status.controlplanetopology being "External".

If the Infrastructure.Status.ControlPlaneTopology is set to 'External', the console-operator will pass this information via the console-config.yaml to the console. Console pod will get re-deployed and will store the topology mode information as a SERVER_FLAG. Based on that value we need to suspend kubeadmin notifier, from the global notifications, since it contain link for updating the cluster OAuth configuration (see attachment).

 

 

If the Infrastructure.Status.ControlPlaneTopology is set to 'External', the console-operator will pass this information via the console-config.yaml to the console. Console pod will get re-deployed and will store the topology mode information as a SERVER_FLAG. Based on that value we need to suspend these notifications:

  • cluster upgrade notifications
  • new channel available notifications

For these we will need to check `ControlPlaneTopology`, if it's set to 'External' and also check if the user can edit cluster version(either by creating a hook or an RBAC call, eg. `canEditClusterVersion`)

 

Check section 05 for more info: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k76JtRRHBdCCEjHPqKcYvbNVsuaGmRhWDLESWIm0mbo/edit#

If the Infrastructure.Status.ControlPlaneTopology is set to 'External', the console-operator will pass this information via the console-config.yaml co the console. Console pod will get re-deployed and will store the topology mode information as a SERVER_FLAG. Based on that value we need surface a message that the control plane is externally managed and add following changes:

  • Remove update button
  • Make channel read only
  • Link out to read only CV details page
  • Remove the ability to edit upstream configuration
  • Remove the cluster autoscaler field
  • Add an alert to the page so that users know the control plane is externally managed

In general, anything that changes a cluster version should be read only.

Check section 02 for more info: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k76JtRRHBdCCEjHPqKcYvbNVsuaGmRhWDLESWIm0mbo/edit#

 

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • So the UX satisfies the current trands, where dark mode is becoming a standard for modern services.  

Acceptance Criteria

  • OCP admin console must be rendered in a preferred mode based on `prefers-color-scheme` media query
  • OCP admin console must be rendered in a preferred mode selected in the User Setting page
  • Create an followup epic/story for and listing and tracking changes needed in OCP console's dynamic plugins

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. PatternFly - Dark mode PF variables

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. Mike Coker has worked on a POC from the PF point of view on both the admin and dev console, and the screenshot results are listed below along with the repo branch. Also listed is a document covering some of the common issues found when putting together the admin console POC. https://github.com/mcoker/console/tree/dark-theme
    Background POC work completed for reference:

PatternFly Dark Theme Handbookhttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1mRYEfUoOjTsSt7hiqjbeplqhfo3_rVDO0QqMj2p67pw/edit

Admin Console -> Workloads & Pods

Dev Console -> Gotcha pages: Observe Dashboard and Metrics, Add, Pipelines: builder, list, log, and run

Open questions::

  1. Who should be responsible for updating DynamicPlugins to be able to render in dark mode?

As a developer, I want to be able to fix remaining issues from the spreadsheet of issues generated after the initial pass and spike of adding dark theme to the console.. As such, I need to make sure to either complete all remaining issues for the spreadsheet, or, create a bug or future story for any remaining issues in these two documents.

 

Acceptance criteria:

As a developer, I want to be able to scope the changes needed to enable dark mode for the admin console. As such, I need to investigate how much of the console will display dark mode using PF variables and also define a list of gotcha pages/components which will need special casing above and beyond PF variable settings.

 

Acceptance criteria:

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

The Cluster Dashboard Details Card Protractor integration test was failing at high rate, and despite multiple attempts to fix, was never fully resolved, so it was disabled as a way to fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068594. Migrating this entire file to Cypress should give us better debugging capability, which is what was done to fix a similarly problematic project dashboard Protractor test.

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

  •  

We need to provide a base for running integration tests using the dynamic plugins. The tests should initially

  • Create a deployment and service to run the dynamic demo plugin
  • Update the console operator config to enable the plugin
  • Wait for the plugin to be available
  • Test at least one extension point used by the plugin (such as adding items to the nav)
  • Disable the plugin when done

Once the basic framework is in place, we can update the demo plugin and add new integration tests when we add new extension points.

https://github.com/openshift/console/tree/master/frontend/dynamic-demo-plugin

 

https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/console/dynamic-plugins.md

 

https://github.com/openshift/console/tree/master/frontend/packages/console-plugin-sdk

Currently, you need to navigate to

Cluster Settings ->
Global configuration ->
Console (operator) config ->
Console plugins

to see and managed plugins. This takes a lot of clicks and is not discoverable. We should look at surfacing plugin details where they're easier to find – perhaps on the Cluster Settings page – or at least provide a more convenient link somewhere in the UI.

AC: Add the Dynamic Plugins section to the Status Card in the overview that will contain:

  • count of active and non-active plugins
  • link to the ConsolePlugins instances page
  • status of the loaded plugins and breakout error

cc Ali Mobrem Robb Hamilton

Currently, enabled plugins can fail to load for a variety of reasons. For instance, plugins don't load if the plugin name in the manifest doesn't match the ConsolePlugin name or the plugin has an invalid codeRef. There is no indication in the UI that something has gone wrong. We should explore ways to report this problem in the UI to cluster admins. Depending on the nature of the issue, an admin might be able to resolve the issue or at least report a bug against the plugin.

The message about failing could appear in the notification drawer and/or console plugins tab on the operator config. We could also explore creating an alert if a plugin is failing.

 

AC:

  • Add notification into the Notification Drawer in case a Dynamic Plugin will error out during load.
  • Render these errors in the status card, notification section, as well.
  • For each failed plugin we should create a separate notification.

We have a Timestamp component for consistent display of dates and times that we should expose through the SDK. We might also consider a hook that formats dates and times for places were you don't want or cant use the component, eg. times on a chart. 

This will become important when we add a user preference for dates so that plugins show consistent dates and times as console. If I set my user preference to UTC dates, console should show UTC dates everywhere.

 

AC:

  • Expose the Timestamp component inside the SDK. 
  • Replace the connect with useSelector hook
  • Keep the original component and proxy it to the new one in the SDK

 

 

 

cc Jakub Hadvig Sho Weimer 

In the 4.11 release, a console.openshift.io/default-i18next-namespace annotation is being introduced. The annotation indicates whether the ConsolePlugin contains localization resources. If the annotation is set to "true", the localization resources from the i18n namespace named after the dynamic plugin (e.g. plugin__kubevirt), are loaded. If the annotation is set to any other value or is missing on the ConsolePlugin resource, localization resources are not loaded. 

 

In case these resources are not present in the dynamic plugin, the initial console load will be slowed down. For more info check BZ#2015654

 

AC:

  • console-operator should be checking for the new console.openshift.io/use-i18n annotation, update the console-config.yaml accordingly and redeploy the console server
  • console server should pick up the changes in the console-config.yaml and only load the i18n namespace that are available

 

Follow up of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CONSOLE-3159

 

 

Goal

  • Add the ability for users to select supported but not recommended updates.
  • Refine workflow when both "upgradeable=false" and "supported-but-not-recommended" updates occur

Background
RFE: for 4.10, Cincinnati and the cluster-version operator are adding conditional updates (a.k.a. targeted edge blocking): https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OTA-267

High-level plans in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#update-client-support-for-the-enhanced-schema

Example of what the oc adm upgrade UX will be in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#cluster-administrator.

The oc implementation landed via https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/961.

Design

  • Use case 01: "supported but not recommended" occurs to the latest version:
    • Add an info icon next to the version on update path with a pop-over to explain about why updating to this version is supported, but not recommended and a link to known risks
    • Identify the difference in "recommended" versions, "supported but not recommended" versions, and "blocked" versions (upgradeable=false) in the + more modal.
    • The latest version is pre-selected in the dropdown in the update modal with an inline alert to inform users about supported-but-not-recommended version with link to known risks. Users can choose to update to another recommended versions, update to a supported-but-not-recommended one, or wait.
    • The "recommended" and "supported but not recommended" updates are separated in the dropdown.
    • If a user selects a "recommended" update, the inline alert disappears.
  • Use case 02: When both "upgradeable=false" and "supported but not recommended" occur:
    • Add an alert banner to explain why users shouldn’t update to the latest version and link to how to resolve on the cluster settings details page. Users have the options to resolve the issue, update to a patch version, or wait.
    • If users open the update modal without resolving the "upgradeable=false" issue, the next recommended version is pre-selected. An expandable link "View blocked versions (#)" is included under the dropdown to show "upgradeable=false" versions with resolve link.
    • If users resolve the "upgradeable=false" issue, the cluster settings page will change to use case 01
    • Question: Priority on changing the upgradeable=false alert banner in update modal and blocked versions in dropdown

See design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Nja4whdsI5dKmQNS_rXyN8IGtRXDJ8gXuU_eSxBLMIY/edit#

See marvel: https://marvelapp.com/prototype/h3ehaa4/screen/86077932

The "Update Version" modal on the cluster settings page should be updated to give users information about recommended, not recommended, and blocked update versions.

  • When the modal is opened, the latest recommended update version should be pre-selected in the version dropdown.
  • Blocked versions should no longer be displayed in the version dropdown, and should instead be displayed in a collapsible field below the dropdown.
  • When blocked versions are present, a link should be provided to the cluster operator tab. The version dropdown itself should have two labeled sections: "Recommended" and "Supported but not recommended".
  • When the user selects a "Supported but not recommended" item from the version dropdown, an inline info alert should appear below the version selection field and should provide a link to known risks associated with the selected version. This is an external link provided through the ClusterVersion API.

Update the cluster settings page to inform the user when the latest available update is supported but not recommended. Add an informational popover to the latest version in  update path visualization.

Epic Goal

  • Add telemetry so that we know how image stream features are used.

Why is this important?

  • We have a long standing epic to create image streams v2. We need to better understand how image streams are used today.

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Epic Goal

  • Make the image registry distributed across availability zones.

Why is this important?

  • The registry should be highly available and zone failsafe.

Scenarios

  1. As an administrator I want to rely on a default configuration that spreads image registry pods across topology zones so that I don't suffer from a long recovery time (>6 mins) in case of a complete zone failure if all pods are impacted.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Pod's topologySpreadConstraints

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-image-registry-operator/pull/730
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Story: As an administrator I want to rely on a default configuration that spreads image registry pods across topology zones so that I don't suffer from a long recovery time (>6 mins) in case of a complete zone failure if all pods are impacted.

Background: The image registry currently uses affinity/anti-affinity rules to spread registry pods across different hosts. However this might cause situations in which all pods end up on hosts of a single zone, leading to a long recovery time of the registry if that zone is lost entirely. However due to problems in the past with the preferred setting of anti-affinity rule adherence the configuration was forced instead with required and the rules became constraints. With zones as constraints the internal registry would not have deployed anymore in environments with a single zone, e.g. internal CI environment. Pod topology constraints is a new API that is supported in OCP which can also relax constraints in case they cannot be satisfied. Details here: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.7/nodes/scheduling/nodes-scheduler-pod-topology-spread-constraints.html

Acceptance criteria:

  • by default the internal registry is deployed with at least two replica
  • by default the topology constraints should be on a zone-basis, so that by defaults one registry pod is scheduled in each zone
  • when constraints can't be satisfied the registry should deploy anyway
  • we should not do this in SNO environments
  • the registry should still work on SNO environments

Open Questions:

  • what happens in environments where the storage is zone dependent?
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

As an OpenShift administrator
I want to provide the registry operator with a custom certificate authority for S3 storage
so that I can use a third-party S3 storage provider.

Acceptance criteria

  1. Users can specify a configmap name (from openshift-config) in config.imageregistry/cluster's spec.storage.s3.
  2. The operator uses CA from this configmap to check S3 bucket.
  3. The image registry pod uses CA from this configmap to access the S3 bucket.
  4. When a custom CA is defined, the operator/image-registry should still trust certificate authorities that are used by Amazon S3 and other well-known CAs.
  5. An end-to-end test that runs minio and checks the image registry becomes healthy with it.

Goal

Remove Jenkins from the OCP Payload.

Problem

  • Jenkins images are "non-trival in size, impact experience around OCP payloads
  • Security advisories cannot be handled once, but against all actively supported OCP releases, adding to response time for handling said advisories
  • Some customers may now want to upgrade Jenkins as OCP upgrades (making this configurable is more ideal)

Why is this important

  • This is an engineering motivated item to reduce costs so we have more cycles for strategic work
  • Aside from the team itself, top level OCP architects want this to reduce the image size, improve general OCP upgrade experience
  • Sends a mix message with respect to what is startegic CI/CI when Jenkins is baked into OCP, but Tekton/Pipelines is an add-on, day 2 install sort of thing

Dependencies (internal and external)

See epic linking - need alternative non payload image available to provide relatively seamless migration

 

Also, the EP for this is approved and merged at https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/builds/remove-jenkins-payload.md

Estimate (xs, s, m, l, xl, xxl):

Questions:

       PARTIAL ANSWER ^^:  confirmed with Ben Parees in https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C014MHHKUSF/p1646683621293839 that EP merging is currently sufficient OCP "technical leadership" approval.

 

Previous work

 

Customers

assuming none

User Stories

 

As maintainers of the OpenShift jenkins component, we need run Jenkins CI for PR testing against openshift/jenkins, openshift/jenkins-sync-plugin, openshift/jenkins-client-plugin, openshift/jenkins-openshift-login-plugin, using images built in the CI pipeline but not injected into CI test clusters via sample operator overriding the jenkins sample imagestream with the jenkins payload image.

 

As maintainers of the OpenShift Jenkins component, we need Jenkins periodics for the client and sync plugins to run against the latest non payload, CPaas image, promoted to CI's image locations on quay.io, for the current release in development.

 

As maintainers of the OpenShift Jenkins component, we need Jenkins related tests outside of very basic Jenkins Pipieline Strategy Build Config verification, removed from openshift-tests in OpenShift Origin, using a non-payload, CPaas image pertinent to the branch in question.

Acceptance criteria

  • all PR CI Tests do not utilize samples operator manipulation of the jenkins imagestream with the in payload image, but rather images including the PRs changes
  • all periodic CI Tests do not utilize samples operator manipulation of the jenkins imagestream with the in payload image, but rather CI promoted images for the current release pushed to quay.io

High Level, we ideally want to vet the new CPaas image via CI and periodics BEFORE we start changing the samples operator so that it does not manipulate the jenkins imagestream (our tests will override the samples operator override)

QE Impact

NONE ... QE should wait until JNKS-254

Docs Impact

NONE

PX Impact

 

NONE

Launch Checklist

Dependencies identified
Blockers noted and expected delivery timelines set
Design is implementable
Acceptance criteria agreed upon
Story estimated

Notes

  • Our CSI shared resource experience will help us here
  • but the old IMAGE_FORMAT stuff is deprecated, and does not work well with step registry stuff
  • instead, we need to use https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#dependency-overrides
  • Makefile level logic will use `oc tag` to update the jenkins imagestream created as part of samples to override the use of the in payload image with the image build by the PR, or for periodics, with what has been promoted to quay.io
  • Ultimately, CI step registry for capturing the `oc tag` update the imagestream logic is the probably end goal
  • JNKS-268 might change how we do periodics, but the current thought is to get existing periodics working with the CPaas image first

Possible staging

1) before CPaas is available, we can validate images generated by PRs to openshift/jenkins, openshift/jenkins-sync-plugin, openshift/jenkins-client-plugin by taking the image built by the image (where the info needed to get the right image from the CI registry is in the IMAGE_FORMAT env var) and then doing an `oc tag --source=docker <PR image ref> openshift/jenkins:2` to replace the use of the payload image in the jenkins imagestream in the openshift namespace with the PRs image

2) insert 1) in https://github.com/openshift/release/blob/master/ci-operator/step-registry/jenkins/sync-plugin/e2e/jenkins-sync-plugin-e2e-commands.sh and https://github.com/openshift/release/blob/master/ci-operator/step-registry/jenkins/client-plugin/tests/jenkins-client-plugin-tests-commands.sh where you test for IMAGE_FORMAT being set

3) or instead of 2) you update the Makefiles for the plugins to call a script that does the same sort of thing, see what is in IMAGE_FORMAT, and if it has something, do the `oc tag`

 

https://github.com/openshift/release/pull/26979 is a prototype of how to stick the image built from a PR and conceivably the periodics to get the image built from it and tag it into the jenkins imagestream in the openshift namespace in the test cluster

 

Epic Goal

  • Remove this UI from our stack that we cannot support.

Why is this important?

  • Reduce support burden.
  • Remove Bugzilla burden of addressing continuous CVEs found in this project.

Acceptance Criteria

  • All Prometheus upstream UI links are removed
  • Related documentation is updated
  • Ports/routes etc configured to expose access to this UI are removed such that no configuration we provide enables access to this UI or its codepaths.
  • There is no reason any CVEs found in this UI would ever require intervention by the Monitoring Team.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Make the Prometheus Targets information available in Console UI (https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1079)

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

After installing or upgrading to the latest OCP version, the existing OpenShift route to the prometheus-k8s service is updated to be a path-based route to '/api/v1'.

DoD:

  • It is not possible to access the Prometheus UI via the OpenShift route
  • Using a bearer token with sufficient permissions, it is possible to access the /api/v1/* endpoints via the OpenShift route.
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Following up on https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1320, we added three new CLI flags to Prometheus to apply different limits on the samples' labels. These new flags are available starting from Prometheus v2.27.0, which will most likely be shipped in OpenShift 4.9.

The limits that we want to look into for OCP are the following ones:

# Per-scrape limit on number of labels that will be accepted for a sample. If
# more than this number of labels are present post metric-relabeling, the
# entire scrape will be treated as failed. 0 means no limit.
[ label_limit: <int> | default = 0 ]

# Per-scrape limit on length of labels name that will be accepted for a sample.
# If a label name is longer than this number post metric-relabeling, the entire
# scrape will be treated as failed. 0 means no limit.
[ label_name_length_limit: <int> | default = 0 ]

# Per-scrape limit on length of labels value that will be accepted for a sample.
# If a label value is longer than this number post metric-relabeling, the
# entire scrape will be treated as failed. 0 means no limit.
[ label_value_length_limit: <int> | default = 0 ]

We could benefit from them by setting relatively high values that could only induce unbound cardinality and thus reject the targets completely if they happened to breach our constrainst.

DoD:

  • Being able to configure label scrape limits for UWM

Epic Goal

When users configure CMO to interact with systems outside of an OpenShift cluster, we want to provide an easy way to add the cluster ID to the data send.

Why is this important?

Technically this can be achieved today, by adding an identifying label to the remote_write configuration for a given cluster. The operator adding the remote_write integration needs to take care that the label is unique over the managed fleet of clusters. This however adds management complexity. Any given cluster already has a pseudo-unique datum, that can be used for this purpose.

  • Starting in 4.9 we support the Prometheus remote_write feature to send metric data to a storage integration outside of the cluster similar to our own Telemetry service.
  • In Telemetry we already use the cluster ID to distinguish the various clusters.
  • For users of remote_write this could add an easy way to add such distinguishing information.

Scenarios

  1. An organisation with multiple OpenShift clusters want to store their metric data centralized in a dedicated system and use remote_write in all their clusters to send this data. When querying their centralized storage, metadata (here a label) is needed to separate the data of the various clusters.
  2. Service providers who manage multiple clusters for multiple customers via a centralized storage system need distinguishing metadata too. See https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSD-6573 for example

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Document how to use this feature

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. none

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. none

Open questions::

  1.  

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Implementation proposal:

 

Expose a flag in the CMO configuration, that is false by default (keeps backward compatibility) and when set to true will add the _id label to a remote_write configuration. More specifically it will be added to the top of a remote_write relabel_config list via the replace action. This will add the label as expect, but additionally a user could alter this label in a later relabel config to suit any specific requirements (say rename the label or add additional information to the value).
The location of this flag is the remote_write Spec, so this can be set for individual remote_write configurations.

We currently use a sample app to e2e test remote write in CMO.
In order to test the addition of the cluster_id relabel config, we need to confirm that the metrics send actually have the expected label.
For this test we should use Prometheus as the remote_write target. This allows us to query the metrics send via remote write and confirm they have the expected label.

Add an optional boolean flag to CMOs definition of RemoteWriteSpec that if true adds an entry in the specs WriteRelabelConfigs list.

I went with adding the relabel config to all user-supplied remote_write configurations. This path has no risk for backwards compatibility (unless users use the {}tmp_openshift_cluster_id{} label, seems unlikely) and reduces overall complexity, as well as documentation complexity.

The entry should look like what is already added to the telemetry remote write config and it should be added as the first entry in the list, before any user supplied relabel configs.

Epic Goal

  • Offer the option to double the scrape intervals for CMO controlled ServiceMonitors in single node deployments
  • Alternatively automatically double the same scrape intervals if CMO detects an SNO setup

The potential target ServiceMonitors are:

  • kubelet
  • kube-state-metrics
  • node-exporter
  • etcd
  • openshift-state-metrics

Why is this important?

  • Reduce CPU usage in SNO setups
  • Specifically doubling the scrape interval is important because:
  1. we are confident that this will have the least chance to interfere with existing rules. We typically have rate queries over the last 2 minutes (no shorter time window). With 30 second scrape intervals (the current default) this gives us 4 samples in any 2 minute window. rate needs at least 2 samples to work, we want another 2 for failure tolerance. Doubling the scrape interval will still give us 2 samples in most 2 minute windows. If a scrape fails, a few rule evaluations might fail intermittently.
  2. We expect a measureable reduction of CPU resources (see previous work)

Scenarios

  1. RAN deployments (Telco Edge) are SNO deployments. In these setups a full CMO deployment is often not needed and the default setup consumes too many resources. OpenShift as a whole has only very limited CPU cycles available and too many cycles are spend on Monitoring

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1569

Open questions:

  1. Whether doubling some scrape intervals reduces CPU usage to fit into the assigned budget

Non goals

  • Allow arbitrarily long scrape intervals. This will interfere with alert and recoring rules
  • Implement a global override to scrape intervals.
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Description

As a user, I want the topology view to be less cluttered as I doom out showing only information that I can discern and still be able to get a feel for the status of my project.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When zoomed to 50% scale, all labels & decorators will be hidden. Label are shown when hovering over the node
  2. When zoomed to 30% scale, all labels, decorators, pod rings & icons will be hidden. Node shape remains the same, and background is either white, yellow or red. Background color is determined based on aggregate status of pods, alerts, builds and pipelines. Tooltip is available showing node name as well as the "things" which are attributing to the warning/error status.

Additional Details:

Description

As a user, I want to understand which service bindings connected a service to a component successfully or not. Currently it's really difficult to understand and needs inspection into each ServiceBinding resource (yaml).

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show a status badge on the SB details page
  2. Show a Status field in the right column of the SB details page
  3. Show the Status field in the right column of the Topology side panel when a SB is selected
  4. Show an indicator in the Topology view which will help to differentiate when the service binding is in error state
  5. Define the available statuses & associated icons 🥴
    1. Connected
    2. Error
  6. Error states defined by the SB conditions … if any of these 3 are not True, the status will be displayed as Error

Additional Details:

See also https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OzE74z2RGO5LPjtDoJeUgYBQXBSVmD5tCC7xfJotE00/edit

Problem:

This epic is mainly focused on the 4.10 Release QE activities

Goal:

1. Identify the scenarios for automation
2. Segregate the test Scenarios into smoke, Regression and other user stories
a. Update the https://docs.jboss.org/display/ODC/Automation+Status+Report
3. Align with layered operator teams for updating scripts
3. Work closely with dev team for epic automation
4. Create the automation scripts using cypress
5. Implement CI for nightly builds
6. Execute scripts on sprint basis

Why is it important?

To the track the QE progress at one place in 4.10 Release Confluence page

Use cases:

  1. <case>

Acceptance criteria:

  1. <criteria>

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Acceptance criteria:

  1. Execute the automation scripts on ODC nightly builds in OpenShift CI (prow) periodically
  2. provide a separate job for each "plugin" (like pipelines, knative, etc.)

Goal:

This epic covers a number of customer requests(RFEs) as well as increases usability.

Why is it important?

Customer satisfaction as well as improved usability.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Allow user to re-arrange the resources which have ben added to nav by the user
  2. Improved user experience (form based experience)
    1. Form based editing of Routes
    2. Form based creation and editing of Config Maps
    3. Form base creation of Deployments
  3. Improved discovery
    1. Include Share my project on the Add page to increase discoverability
    2. NS Helm Chart Repo
      1. Add tile to Add page for discoverability
      2. Provide a form driven creation experience
      3. User should be able to switch back and forth from Form/YAML
      4. change the intro text to the below & have the link in the intro text bring up the full page form
        1. Browse for charts that help manage complex installations and upgrades. Cluster administrators can customize the content made available in the catalog. Alternatively, developers can try to configure their own custom Helm Chart repository.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

None

Exploration:

Miro board from Epic Exploration

Description

As a user, I want to use a form to create Deployments

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Use existing edit Deployment form component for creating Deployments
  2. Display the form when clicked on `Create Deployment` in the Deployments Search page in the Dev perspective
  3. The `Create Deployment` button in the Deployments list page & the search page in the Admin perspective should have a similar experience.

Additional Details:

Edit deployment form ODC-5007

Description

As a user, I should be able to switch between the form and yaml editor while creating the ProjectHelmChartRepository CR.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Convert the create form into a form-yaml switcher
  2. Display this form-yaml view in Search -> ProjectHelmChartRepositories in both perspectives

Additional Details:

Form component https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11227

Problem:

Currently we are only able to get limited telemetry from the Dev Sandbox, but not from any of our managed clusters or on prem clusters.

Goals:

  1. Enable gathering segment telemetry whenever cluster telemetry is enabled on OSD clusters
  2. Have our OSD clusters opt into telemetry by default
  3. Work with PM & UX to identify additional metrics to capture in addition to what we have enabled currently on Sandbox.
  4. Ability to get a single report from woopra across all of our Sandbox and OSD clusters.
  5. Be able to generate a report including metrics of a single cluster or all clusters of a certain type ( sandbox, or OSD)

Why is it important?

In order to improve properly analyze usage and the user experience, we need to be able to gather as much data as possible.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Extend console backend (bridge) to provide configuration as SERVER_FLAGS
    // JS type
    telemetry?: Record<string, string>
    
    1. Read the annotation of the cluster ConfigMap for telemetry data and pass them into the internal serverconfig.
    2. Pass through this internal serverconfig and export it as SERVER_FLAGS.
    3. Add a new --telemetry CLI option so that the telemetry options could be tested in a dev environment:
      ./bin/bridge --telemetry SEGMENT_API_KEY=a-key-123-xzy
      ./bin/bridge --telemetry CONSOLE_LOG=debug
      
  2. TBD: In best case the new annotation could be read from the cluster ConfigMap...
    1. Otherwise update the console-operator to pass the annotation from the console cluster configuration to the console ConfigMap.

Additional Details:

  1. More information about the integration with the backend could be found in the Telemetry on OSD clusters Google Doc

Goal:
Enhance oc adm release new (and related verbs info, extract, mirror) with heterogeneous architecture support

tl;dr

oc adm release new (and related verbs info, extract, mirror) would be enhanced to optionally allow the creation of manifest list release payloads. The manifest list flow would be triggered whenever the CVO image in an imagestream was a manifest list. If the CVO image is a standard manifest, the generated release payload will also be a manifest. If the CVO image is a manifest list, the generated release payload would be a manifest list (containing a manifest for each arch possessed by the CVO manifest list).

In either case, oc adm release new would permit non-CVO component images to be manifest or manifest lists and pass them through directly to the resultant release manifest(s).

If a manifest list release payload is generated, each architecture specific release payload manifest will reference the same pullspecs provided in the input imagestream.

 

More details in Option 1 of https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOlPrmPhuGboZbLZWApXszxuJ1eish92NlOeb03XEdE/edit#heading=h.eldc1ppinjjh

Incomplete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were not completed when this image was assembled

Epic Goal

  • Update image registry dependencies (Kubernetes and OpenShift) to the latest versions.

Why is this important?

  • New versions usually bring improvements that are needed by the registry and help with getting updates for z-stream.

Scenarios

  1. As an OpenShift engineer, I want my components to use the versions of dependencies, so that they get fixes for known issues and can be easily updated in z-stream.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Kubernetes 1.24

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. IR-210

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>

As a OpenShift engineer
I want image-registry to use the latest k8s libraries
so that image-registry can benefit from new upstream features.

Acceptance criteria

  • image-registry uses k8s.io/api v1.24.z
  • image-registry uses latest openshift/api, openshift/library-go, openshift/client-go

Epic Goal

  • Provide a dedicated dashboard for NVIDIA GPU usage visualization in the OpenShift Console.

Why is this important?

  • Customers that use GPUs in their clusters usually have the GPU workloads as the main purpose of their cluster. As such, it makes much more sense to have the details about the usage they are doing of GPGPU resources AND CPU/RAM rather than just CPU/RAM

Scenarios

  1. As an admin of a cluster dedicated to data science, I want to quickly find out how much of my very costly resources are currently in use and if things are getting queued due to lack of resources

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. The NVIDIA GPU Operator must export to prometheus the relevant data

Open questions::

  1. Will NVIDIA agree to these extra data exports in their GPU Operator?

I asked Zvonko Kaiser and he seemed open to it. I need to confirm with Shiva Merla

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Run OpenShift builds that do not execute as the "root" user on the host node.

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift builds require an elevated set of capabilities to build a container image
  • Builds currently run as root to maintain adequate performance
  • Container workloads should run as non-root from the host's perspective. Containers running as root are a known security risk.
  • Builds currently run as root and require a privileged container. See BUILD-225 for removing the privileged container requirement.

Scenarios

  1. Run BuildConfigs in a multi-tenant environment
  2. Run BuildConfigs in a heightened security environment/deployment

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can opt into running builds in a cri-o user namespace by providing an environment variable with a specific value.
  • When the correct environment variable is provided, builds run in a cri-o user namespace, and the build pod does not require the "privileged: true" security context.
  • User namespace builds can pass basic test scenarios for the Docker and Source strategy build.
  • Steps to run unprivileged builds are documented.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Buildah supports running inside a non-privileged container
  2. CRI-O allows workloads to opt into running containers in user namespaces.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. BUILD-225 - remove privileged requirement for builds.

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a developer building container images on OpenShift
I want to specify that my build should run without elevated privileges
So that builds do not run as root from the host's perspective with elevated privileges

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can provide an environment variable to indicate the build should not use privileged containers
  • When the correct env var + value is specified, builds run in a user namespace (non-root on the host)

QE Impact

No QE required for Dev Preview. OpenShift regression testing will verify that existing behavior is not impacted.

Docs Impact

We will need to document how to enable this feature, with sufficient warnings regarding Dev Preview.

PX Impact

This likely warrants an OpenShift blog post, potentially?

Notes

Other Complete

This section includes Jira cards that are not linked to either an Epic or a Feature. These tickets were completed when this image was assembled

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11844. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5548. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
This is a follow-up on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2083087 and https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12390

When creating a Deployment, DeploymentConfig, or Knative Service with enabled Pipeline, and then deleting it again with the enabled option "Delete other resources created by console" (only available on 4.13+ with the PR above) the automatically created Pipeline is not deleted.

When the user tries to create the same resource with a Pipeline again this fails with an error:

An error occurred
secrets "nodeinfo-generic-webhook-secret" already exists

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.13

(we might want to backport this together with https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12390 and OCPBUGS-5547)

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Install OpenShift Pipelines operator (tested with 1.8.2)
  2. Create a new project
  3. Navigate to Add > Import from git and create an application
  4. Case 1: In the topology select the new resource and delete it
  5. Case 2: In the topology select the application group and delete the complete app

Actual results:
Case 1: Delete resources:

  1. Deployment (tries it twice!) $name
  2. Service $name
  3. Route $name
  4. ImageStream $name

Case 2: Delete application:

  1. Deployment (just once) $name
  2. Service $name
  3. Route $name
  4. ImageStream $name

Expected results:
Case 1: Delete resource:

  1. Delete Deployment $name should be called just once
  2. (Keep this deletion) Service $name
  3. (Keep this deletion) Route $name
  4. (Keep this deletion) ImageStream $name
  5. Missing deletion of the Tekton Pipeline $name
  6. Missing deletion of the Tekton TriggerTemplate with generated name trigger-template-$name-$random
  7. Missing deletion of the Secret $name-generic-webhook-secret
  8. Missing deletion of the Secret $name-github-webhook-secret

Case 2: Delete application:

  1. (Keep this deletion) Deployment $name
  2. (Keep this deletion) Service $name
  3. (Keep this deletion) Route $name
  4. (Keep this deletion) ImageStream $name
  5. Missing deletion of the Tekton Pipeline $name
  6. Missing deletion of the Tekton TriggerTemplate with generated name trigger-template-$name-$random
  7. Missing deletion of the Secret $name-generic-webhook-secret
  8. Missing deletion of the Secret $name-github-webhook-secret

Additional info:

Description of problem:

Pipeline list page fetches all the pipelineruns to find the last pipeline run and which results in more load time. This performance issue needs to be addressed in all the pieplines list pages wherever applicable.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.9

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create 10+ pipelines in a namespace
2. Create more number of pipelineruns under each pipeline
3. navigate to piplines list page.

Actual results:
Pipelines list will take a long time to load the list.

Expected results:

Pipeline list should not take more time to load the list.

Additional info:

Reduce the amount to data fetched to find the last pipelinerun, maybe use PartialMetadata to find the latest pipeline run and to improve the performance.

Description of problem:

Cluster running 4.10.52 had three aws-ebs-csi-driver-node pods begin to consume multiple GB of memory, causing heavy node memory pressure as the pods have no memory limit. 

All other aws-ebs-csi-driver-node pods were still in the 50-70MB range:

NAME                                            CPU(cores)   MEMORY(bytes)   
aws-ebs-csi-driver-controller-59867579b-d6s2q   0m           397Mi           
aws-ebs-csi-driver-controller-59867579b-t4wgq   0m           276Mi           
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-4rmvk                   0m           53Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-5799f                   0m           50Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-6dpvg                   0m           59Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-6ldzk                   0m           65Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-6mbk5                   0m           54Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-bkvsr                   0m           50Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-c2fb2                   0m           62Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-f422m                   0m           61Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-lwzbb                   6m           1940Mi          
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-mjznt                   0m           53Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-pczsj                   0m           62Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-pmskn                   0m           3493Mi          
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-qft8w                   0m           68Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-v5bpx                   11m          2076Mi          
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-vn8km                   0m           84Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-ws6hx                   0m           73Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-xsk7k                   0m           59Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-xzwlh                   0m           55Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator-8c5ffb6d4-fk6zk     5m           88Mi            

Deleting the pods caused them to recreate, with normal memory consumption levels.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.52

How reproducible:

Unknown

OCPBUGS-1251 landed an admin-ack gate in 4.11.z to help admins prepare for Kubernetes 1.25 API removals which are coming in OpenShift 4.12. Poking around in a 4.12.0-ec.2 cluster where APIRemovedInNextReleaseInUse is firing:

$ oc --as system:admin adm must-gather -- /usr/bin/gather_audit_logs
$ zgrep -h v1beta1/poddisruptionbudget must-gather.local.1378724704026451055/quay*/audit_logs/kube-apiserver/*.log.gz | jq -r '.verb + " " + (.user | .username + " " + (.extra["authentication.kubernetes.io/pod-name"] | tostr
ing))' | sort | uniq -c
parse error: Invalid numeric literal at line 29, column 6
     28 watch system:serviceaccount:openshift-machine-api:cluster-autoscaler ["cluster-autoscaler-default-5cf997b8d6-ptgg7"]

Finding the source for that container:

$ oc --as system:admin -n openshift-machine-api get -o json pod cluster-autoscaler-default-5cf997b8d6-ptgg7 | jq -r '.status.containerStatuses[].image'
quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:f81ab7ce0c851ba5e5169bba717cb54716ce5457cbe89d159c97a5c25fd820ed
$ oc image info quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:f81ab7ce0c851ba5e5169bba717cb54716ce5457cbe89d159c97a5c25fd820ed | grep github
             SOURCE_GIT_URL=https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes-autoscaler
             io.openshift.build.commit.url=https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes-autoscaler/commit/1dac0311b9842958ec630273428b74703d51c1c9
             io.openshift.build.source-location=https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes-autoscaler

Poking about in the source:

$ git clone --depth 30 --branch master https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes-autoscaler.git
$ cd kubernetes-autoscaler
$ find . -name vendor
./addon-resizer/vendor
./cluster-autoscaler/vendor
./vertical-pod-autoscaler/e2e/vendor
./vertical-pod-autoscaler/vendor

Lots of vendoring. I haven't checked to see how new the client code is in the various vendor packages. But the main issue seems to be the v1beta1 in:

$ git grep policy cluster-autoscaler/core cluster-autoscaler/utils | grep policy.*v1beta1
cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/actuation/actuator_test.go:   policyv1beta1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/actuation/actuator_test.go:                                   eviction := createAction.GetObject().(*policyv1beta1.Eviction)
cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/actuation/drain.go:   policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/actuation/drain_test.go:      policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/legacy/legacy.go:     policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/legacy/wrapper.go:    policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/scaledown.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
cluster-autoscaler/core/static_autoscaler_test.go:      policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
cluster-autoscaler/utils/drain/drain.go:        policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
cluster-autoscaler/utils/drain/drain_test.go:   policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
cluster-autoscaler/utils/kubernetes/listers.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
cluster-autoscaler/utils/kubernetes/listers.go: v1policylister "k8s.io/client-go/listers/policy/v1beta1"

The main change from v1beta1 to v1 involves spec.selector; I dunno if that's relevant to the autoscaler use-case or not.

Do we run autoscaler CI? I was poking around a bit, but did not find a 4.12 periodic excercising the autoscaler that might have turned up this alert and issue.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3824. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2598. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Liveness probe of ipsec pods fail with large clusters. Currently the command that is executed in the ipsec container is
ovs-appctl -t ovs-monitor-ipsec ipsec/status && ipsec status
The problem is with command "ipsec/status". In clusters with high node count this command will return a list with all the node daemons of the cluster. This means that as the node count raises the completion time of the command raises too. 

This makes the main command 

ovs-appctl -t ovs-monitor-ipsec

To hang until the subcommand is finished.

As the liveness and readiness probe values are hardcoded in the manifest of the ipsec container herehttps//github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/blob/9c1181e34316d34db49d573698d2779b008bcc20/bindata/network/ovn-kubernetes/common/ipsec.yaml] the liveness timeout of the container probe of 60 seconds start to be  insufficient as the node count list is growing. This resulted in a cluster with 170 + nodes to have 15+ ipsec pods in a crashloopbackoff state.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Openshift Container Platform 4.10 but i think the same will be visible to other versions too.

How reproducible:

I was not able to reproduce due to an extreamely high amount of resources are needed and i think that there is no point as we have spotted the issue.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install an Openshift cluster with IPSEC enabled
2. Scale to 170+ nodes or more
3. Notice that the ipsec pods will start getting in a Crashloopbackoff state with failed Liveness/Readiness probes.

Actual results:

Ip Sec pods are stuck in a Crashloopbackoff state

Expected results:

Ip Sec pods to work normally

Additional info:

We have provided a workaround where CVO and CNO operators are scaled to 0 replicas in order for us to be able to increase the liveness probe limit to a value of 600 that recovered the cluster. 
As a next step the customer will try to reduce the node count and restore the default liveness timeout value along with bringing the operators back to see if the cluster will stabilize.

 

1. Proposed title of this feature request
--> Alert generation when the etcd container memory consumption goes beyond 90%

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
--> When the etcd database starts growing rapidly due to some high number of objects like secrets, events, or configmap generation by application/workload, the memory and CPU consumption of APIserver and etcd container (control plane component) spikes up and eventually the control plane nodes goes to hung/unresponsive or crash due to out of memory errors as some of the critical processes/services running on master nodes get killed. Hence we request an alert/alarm when the ETCD container's memory consumption goes beyond 90% so that the cluster administrator can take some action before the cluster/nodes go unresponsive.

I see we already have a etcdExcessiveDatabaseGrowth Prometheus rule which helps when the surge in etcd writes leading to a 50% increase in database size over the past four hours on etcd instance however it does not consider the memory consumption:

$ oc get prometheusrules etcd-prometheus-rules -o yaml|grep -i etcdExcessiveDatabaseGrowth -A 9

  • alert: etcdExcessiveDatabaseGrowth
    annotations:
    description: 'etcd cluster "{{ $labels.job }}": Observed surge in etcd writes
    leading to 50% increase in database size over the past four hours on etcd
    instance {{ $labels.instance }}, please check as it might be disruptive.'
    expr: |
    increase(((etcd_mvcc_db_total_size_in_bytes/etcd_server_quota_backend_bytes)*100)[240m:1m]) > 50
    for: 10m
    labels:
    severity: warning

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
--> Once the etcd memory consumption goes beyond 90-95% of total ram as it's system critical container, the OCP cluster goes unresponsive causing revenue loss to business and impacting the productivity of users of the openshift cluster. 

 

4. List any affected packages or components.
--> etcd

Description of problem:

When running node-density (245 pods/node) on a 120 node cluster, we see that there is a huge spike (~22s) in Avg pod-latency. When the spike occurs we see all the ovnkube-master pods go through a restart. 

The restart happens because of (ovnkube-master pods)

2022-08-10T04:04:44.494945179Z panic: reflect: call of reflect.Value.Len on ptr Value

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-09-114621

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run node-density on a 120 node cluster

Actual results:

Spike observed in pod-latency graph ~22s

Expected results:

Steady pod-latency graph ~4s

Additional info:

Description of problem:

We observed that a dual stack cluster deployed with AI gui only fails.
This cluster is dhcp for ipv4, RA/RS autoconfiguration for ipv6.

It fails with error in the onvkube container

```
I0906 07:45:43.044090   87450 gateway_init.go:261] Initializing Gateway Functionality
I0906 07:45:43.046398   87450 gateway_localnet.go:152] Node local addresses initialized to: map[10.131.31.214:{10.131.31.208 fffffff0} 10.255.0.2:{10.255.0.0 fffffe00} 127.0.0.1:{127.0.0.0 ff000000} 2001:1b74:480:613a:f6e9:d4ff:fef1:6f26:{2001:1b74:480:613a:: ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000} ::1:{::1 ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff} fd01:0:0:1::2:{fd01:0:0:1:: ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000} fe80::8ce9:b4ff:fe1a:1208:{fe80:: ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000} fe80::c8ef:ecff:fee3:64c7:{fe80:: ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000} fe80::f6e9:d4ff:fef1:6f26:{fe80:: ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000}]
I0906 07:45:43.047759   87450 helper_linux.go:71] Provided gateway interface "br-ex", found as index: 7
I0906 07:45:43.048045   87450 helper_linux.go:97] Found default gateway interface br-ex 10.131.31.209
I0906 07:45:43.048152   87450 helper_linux.go:71] Provided gateway interface "br-ex", found as index: 7
F0906 07:45:43.048318   87450 ovnkube.go:133] failed to get default gateway interface
```

on the node we observed that there is multi-path entry during

```
default proto ra metric 48 pref medium
        nexthop via fe80::e2f6:2d01:ab14:ec71 dev br-ex weight 1
        nexthop via fe80::e2f6:2d01:ab11:c271 dev br-ex weight 1
```

I manually remove one of the entries (`ip route delete`) and then delete the ovnkube-node pod. Then the installation continues, container works.

Every time there is multiple entry, if the onvkube-node starts, it fails.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.30

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

There might a side issue: the interface of the node upon boot takes time to get the ipv6 autoconfiguration, no RS packets seemed to be sent out (observed zero on all routers).

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4805. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4101. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

We experienced two separate upgrade failures relating to the introduction of the SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES node sizing parameter, causing kubelet to stop running.

One cluster (clusterA) upgraded from 4.11.14 to 4.11.17. It experienced an issue whereby 
   /etc/node-sizing.env 
on its master nodes contained an empty SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES value:

---
cat /etc/node-sizing.env 
SYSTEM_RESERVED_MEMORY=5.36Gi
SYSTEM_RESERVED_CPU=0.11
SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES=
---

causing the kubelet to not start up. To restore service, this file was manually updated to set a value (1Gi), and kubelet was restarted.

We are uncertain what conditions led to this occuring on the clusterA master nodes as part of the upgrade.

A second cluster (clusterB) upgraded from 4.11.16 to 4.11.17. It experienced an issue whereby worker nodes were impacted by a similar problem, however this was because a custom node-sizing-enabled.env MachineConfig which did not set SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES

This caused existing worker nodes to go into a NotReady state after the ugprade, and additionally new nodes did not join the cluster as their kubelet would become impacted. 

For clusterB the conditions are more well-known of why the value is empty.

However, for both clusters, if SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES ends up as empty on a node it can cause the kubelet to not start. 

We have some asks as a result:
- Can MCO be made to recover from this situation if it occurs, perhaps  through application of a safe default if none exists, such that kubelet would start correctly?
- Can there possibly be alerting that could indicate and draw attention to the misconfiguration?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.17

How reproducible:

Have not been able to reproduce it on a fresh cluster upgrading from 4.11.16 to 4.11.17

Expected results:

If SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES is empty in /etc/node-sizing*env then a default should be applied and/or kubelet able to continue running.

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

The IPI installation in some regions got bootstrap failure, and without any node available/ready.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

12-22 16:22:27.970  ./openshift-install 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-12-21-202045
12-22 16:22:27.970  built from commit 3f9c38a5717c638f952df82349c45c7d6964fcd9
12-22 16:22:27.970  release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2d910488f25e2638b6d61cda2fb2ca5de06eee5882c0b77e6ed08aa7fe680270
12-22 16:22:27.971  release architecture amd64

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. try the IPI installation in the problem regions (so far tried and failed with ap-southeast-2, ap-south-1, eu-west-1, ap-southeast-6, ap-southeast-3, ap-southeast-5, eu-central-1, cn-shanghai, cn-hangzhou and cn-beijing) 

Actual results:

Bootstrap failed to complete

Expected results:

Installation in those regions should succeed.

Additional info:

FYI the QE flexy-install job: https://mastern-jenkins-csb-openshift-qe.apps.ocp-c1.prod.psi.redhat.com/job/ocp-common/job/Flexy-install/166672/

No any node available/ready, and no any operator available.
$ oc get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version             False       True          30m     Unable to apply 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-12-21-202045: an unknown error has occurred: MultipleErrors
$ oc get nodes
No resources found
$ oc get machines -n openshift-machine-api -o wide
NAME                         PHASE   TYPE   REGION   ZONE   AGE   NODE   PROVIDERID   STATE
jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-0                                  30m                       
jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-1                                  30m                       
jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-2                                  30m                       
$ oc get co
NAME                                       VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
authentication
baremetal
cloud-controller-manager                                                                          
cloud-credential                                                                                  
cluster-autoscaler                                                                                
config-operator                                                                                   
console                                                                                           
control-plane-machine-set                                                                         
csi-snapshot-controller                                                                           
dns                                                                                               
etcd                                                                                              
image-registry                                                                                    
ingress                                                                                           
insights                                                                                          
kube-apiserver                                                                                    
kube-controller-manager                                                                           
kube-scheduler                                                                                    
kube-storage-version-migrator                                                                     
machine-api                                                                                       
machine-approver                                                                                  
machine-config                                                                                    
marketplace                                                                                       
monitoring                                                                                        
network                                                                                           
node-tuning                                                                                       
openshift-apiserver                                                                               
openshift-controller-manager                                                                      
openshift-samples                                                                                 
operator-lifecycle-manager                                                                        
operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog                                                                
operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver
service-ca
storage
$

Mater nodes don't run for example kubelet and crio services.
[core@jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-0 ~]$ sudo crictl ps
FATA[0000] unable to determine runtime API version: rpc error: code = Unavailable desc = connection error: desc = "transport: Error while dialing dial unix /var/run/crio/crio.sock: connect: no such file or directory" 
[core@jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-0 ~]$ 

The machine-config-daemon firstboot tells "failed to update OS".
[jiwei@jiwei log-bundle-20221222085846]$ grep -Ei 'error|failed' control-plane/10.0.187.123/journals/journal.log 
Dec 22 16:24:16 localhost kernel: GPT: Use GNU Parted to correct GPT errors.
Dec 22 16:24:16 localhost kernel: GPT: Use GNU Parted to correct GPT errors.
Dec 22 16:24:18 localhost ignition[867]: failed to fetch config: resource requires networking
Dec 22 16:24:18 localhost ignition[891]: GET error: Get "http://100.100.100.200/latest/user-data": dial tcp 100.100.100.200:80: connect: network is unreachable
Dec 22 16:24:18 localhost ignition[891]: GET error: Get "http://100.100.100.200/latest/user-data": dial tcp 100.100.100.200:80: connect: network is unreachable
Dec 22 16:24:19 localhost.localdomain NetworkManager[919]: <info>  [1671726259.0329] hostname: hostname: hostnamed not used as proxy creation failed with: Could not connect: No such file or directory
Dec 22 16:24:19 localhost.localdomain NetworkManager[919]: <warn>  [1671726259.0464] sleep-monitor-sd: failed to acquire D-Bus proxy: Could not connect: No such file or directory
Dec 22 16:24:19 localhost.localdomain ignition[891]: GET error: Get "https://api-int.jiwei-1222f.alicloud-qe.devcluster.openshift.com:22623/config/master": dial tcp 10.0.187.120:22623: connect: connection refused
...repeated logs omitted...
Dec 22 16:27:46 jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-0 ovs-ctl[1888]: 2022-12-22T16:27:46Z|00001|dns_resolve|WARN|Failed to read /etc/resolv.conf: No such file or directory
Dec 22 16:27:46 jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-0 ovs-vswitchd[1888]: ovs|00001|dns_resolve|WARN|Failed to read /etc/resolv.conf: No such file or directory
Dec 22 16:27:46 jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-0 dbus-daemon[1669]: [system] Activation via systemd failed for unit 'dbus-org.freedesktop.resolve1.service': Unit dbus-org.freedesktop.resolve1.service not found.
Dec 22 16:27:46 jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-0 nm-dispatcher[1924]: Error: Device '' not found.
Dec 22 16:27:46 jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-0 nm-dispatcher[1937]: Error: Device '' not found.
Dec 22 16:27:46 jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-0 nm-dispatcher[2037]: Error: Device '' not found.
Dec 22 08:35:32 jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-0 machine-config-daemon[2181]: Warning: failed, retrying in 1s ... (1/2)I1222 08:35:32.477770    2181 run.go:19] Running: nice -- ionice -c 3 oc image extract --path /:/run/mco-extensions/os-extensions-content-910221290 --registry-config /var/lib/kubelet/config.json quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:259d8c6b9ec714d53f0275db9f2962769f703d4d395afb9d902e22cfe96021b0
Dec 22 08:56:06 jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-0 rpm-ostree[2288]: Txn Rebase on /org/projectatomic/rpmostree1/rhcos failed: remote error: Get "https://quay.io/v2/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev/blobs/sha256:27f262e70d98996165748f4ab50248671d4a4f97eb67465cd46e1de2d6bd24d0": net/http: TLS handshake timeout
Dec 22 08:56:06 jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-0 machine-config-daemon[2181]: W1222 08:56:06.785425    2181 firstboot_complete_machineconfig.go:46] error: failed to update OS to quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:411e6e3be017538859cfbd7b5cd57fc87e5fee58f15df19ed3ec11044ebca511 : error running rpm-ostree rebase --experimental ostree-unverified-registry:quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:411e6e3be017538859cfbd7b5cd57fc87e5fee58f15df19ed3ec11044ebca511: Warning: The unit file, source configuration file or drop-ins of rpm-ostreed.service changed on disk. Run 'systemctl daemon-reload' to reload units.
Dec 22 08:56:06 jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-0 machine-config-daemon[2181]: error: remote error: Get "https://quay.io/v2/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev/blobs/sha256:27f262e70d98996165748f4ab50248671d4a4f97eb67465cd46e1de2d6bd24d0": net/http: TLS handshake timeout
Dec 22 08:57:31 jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-0 machine-config-daemon[2181]: Warning: failed, retrying in 1s ... (1/2)I1222 08:57:31.244684    2181 run.go:19] Running: nice -- ionice -c 3 oc image extract --path /:/run/mco-extensions/os-extensions-content-4021566291 --registry-config /var/lib/kubelet/config.json quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:259d8c6b9ec714d53f0275db9f2962769f703d4d395afb9d902e22cfe96021b0
Dec 22 08:59:20 jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-0 systemd[2353]: /usr/lib/systemd/user/podman-kube@.service:10: Failed to parse service restart specifier, ignoring: never
Dec 22 08:59:21 jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-0 podman[2437]: Error: open default: no such file or directory
Dec 22 08:59:21 jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-0 podman[2450]: Error: failed to start API service: accept unixgram @00026: accept4: operation not supported
Dec 22 08:59:21 jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-0 systemd[2353]: podman-kube@default.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
Dec 22 08:59:21 jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-0 systemd[2353]: Failed to start A template for running K8s workloads via podman-play-kube.
Dec 22 08:59:21 jiwei-1222f-v729x-master-0 systemd[2353]: podman.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
[jiwei@jiwei log-bundle-20221222085846]$ 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1629. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

It is a disconnected cluster on AWS. There is an issue configuring Egress IP where the cluster uses STS. While looking into cloud-network-config-controller pod it is trying to connect to the global sts service "https://sts.amazonaws.com/" rather it should connect to the regional one "https://ec2.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com".

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a disconected OCP cluster on AWS.
$ oc get netnamespace | grep egress
egress-ip-test                                     2689387    ["172.16.1.24"]
$ oc get hostsubnet
NAME                                              HOST                                              HOST IP        SUBNET          EGRESS CIDRS   EGRESS IPS
ip-172-16-1-151.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal   ip-172-16-1-151.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal   172.16.1.151   10.130.0.0/23                  
ip-172-16-1-53.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal    ip-172-16-1-53.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal    172.16.1.53    10.131.0.0/23                  ["172.16.1.24"]
ip-172-16-2-15.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal    ip-172-16-2-15.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal    172.16.2.15    10.128.0.0/23                  
ip-172-16-2-77.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal    ip-172-16-2-77.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal    172.16.2.77    10.128.2.0/23                  
ip-172-16-3-111.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal   ip-172-16-3-111.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal   172.16.3.111   10.129.0.0/23                  
ip-172-16-3-79.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal    ip-172-16-3-79.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal    172.16.3.79    10.129.2.0/23                  
$ oc logs sdn-controller-6m5kb -n openshift-sdn I0922 04:09:53.348615       1 vnids.go:105] Allocated netid 2689387 for namespace "egress-ip-test"
E0922 04:24:00.682018       1 egressip.go:254] Ignoring invalid HostSubnet ip-172-16-1-53.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal (host: "ip-172-16-1-53.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal", ip: "172.16.1.53", subnet: "10.131.0.0/23"): related node object "ip-172-16-1-53.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal" has an incomplete annotation "cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig", CloudEgressIPConfig: <nil>
 $ oc logs cloud-network-config-controller-5c7556db9f-x78bs -n openshift-cloud-network-config-controller

E0922 04:26:59.468726       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'ip-172-16-2-77.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: ip-172-16-2-77.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal, err: error: cannot list ec2 instance for node: ip-172-16-2-77.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal, err: WebIdentityErr: failed to retrieve credentials
caused by: RequestError: send request failed
caused by: Post "https://sts.amazonaws.com/": dial tcp 54.239.29.25:443: i/o timeout, requeuing in node workqueue
$ oc get Infrastructure -o yaml
apiVersion: v1
items:
- apiVersion: config.openshift.io/v1
  kind: Infrastructure
  metadata:
    creationTimestamp: "2022-09-22T03:28:15Z"
    generation: 1
    name: cluster
    resourceVersion: "598"
    uid: 994da301-2a96-43b7-b43b-4b7c18d4b716
  spec:
    cloudConfig:
      name: ""
    platformSpec:
      aws:
        serviceEndpoints:
        - name: sts
          url: https://sts.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com
        - name: ec2
          url: https://ec2.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com
        - name: elasticloadbalancing
          url: https://elasticloadbalancing.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com
      type: AWS
  status:
    apiServerInternalURI: https://api-int.openshiftyy.ocpaws.sadiqueonline.com:6443
    apiServerURL: https://api.openshiftyy.ocpaws.sadiqueonline.com:6443
    controlPlaneTopology: HighlyAvailable
    etcdDiscoveryDomain: ""
    infrastructureName: openshiftyy-wfrpf
    infrastructureTopology: HighlyAvailable
    platform: AWS
    platformStatus:
      aws:
        region: ap-southeast-1
        serviceEndpoints:
        - name: ec2
          url: https://ec2.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com
        - name: elasticloadbalancing
          url: https://elasticloadbalancing.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com
        - name: sts
          url: https://sts.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com
      type: AWS
kind: List
metadata:
  resourceVersion: ""
$ oc get secret aws-cloud-credentials -n openshift-machine-api -o json |jq -r .data.credentials |base64 -d 
[default]
sts_regional_endpoints = regional
role_arn = arn:aws:iam::015719942846:role/sputhenp-sts-yy-openshift-machine-api-aws-cloud-credentials
web_identity_token_file = /var/run/secrets/openshift/serviceaccount/token
 
[ec2-user@ip-172-17-1-229 ~]$ oc get secret cloud-credential-operator-iam-ro-creds -n openshift-cloud-credential-operator -o json |jq -r .data.credentials |base64 -d 
[default]
sts_regional_endpoints = regional
role_arn = arn:aws:iam::015719942846:role/sputhenp-sts-yy-openshift-cloud-credential-operator-cloud-creden
web_identity_token_file = /var/run/secrets/openshift/serviceaccount/token
 
[ec2-user@ip-172-17-1-229 ~]$ oc get secret installer-cloud-credentials -n openshift-image-registry -o json |jq -r .data.credentials |base64 -d 
[default]
sts_regional_endpoints = regional
role_arn = arn:aws:iam::015719942846:role/sputhenp-sts-yy-openshift-image-registry-installer-cloud-credent
web_identity_token_file = /var/run/secrets/openshift/serviceaccount/token
 
[ec2-user@ip-172-17-1-229 ~]$ oc get secret cloud-credentials -n openshift-ingress-operator -o json |jq -r .data.credentials |base64 -d 
[default]
sts_regional_endpoints = regional
role_arn = arn:aws:iam::015719942846:role/sputhenp-sts-yy-openshift-ingress-operator-cloud-credentials
web_identity_token_file = /var/run/secrets/openshift/serviceaccount/token
 
[ec2-user@ip-172-17-1-229 ~]$ oc get secret cloud-credentials -n openshift-cloud-network-config-controller -o json |jq -r .data.credentials |base64 -d 
[default]
sts_regional_endpoints = regional
role_arn = arn:aws:iam::015719942846:role/sputhenp-sts-yy-openshift-cloud-network-config-controller-cloud-
web_identity_token_file = /var/run/secrets/openshift/serviceaccount/token
 
[ec2-user@ip-172-17-1-229 ~]$ oc get secret ebs-cloud-credentials -n openshift-cluster-csi-drivers -o json |jq -r .data.credentials |base64 -d
[default]
sts_regional_endpoints = regional
role_arn = arn:aws:iam::015719942846:role/sputhenp-sts-yy-openshift-cluster-csi-drivers-ebs-cloud-credenti
web_identity_token_file = /var/run/secrets/openshift/serviceaccount/token
 

 

Actual results:

Egress IP not configured properly and cloud-network-config-controller trying to connect to global STS service.

Expected results:

Egress IP should get configured and cloud-network-config-controller should connect to regional STS service instead of global.

Additional info:

 

This is a copy of Bugzilla bug 2117524 for backport to 4.11.z

Original Text:

Description of problem:
On routers configured with mTLS and CRL defined in the CA with a CDP ; new CRL is downloaded only when restarting the ingress-operator.

2022-07-20T23:36:26.943Z	INFO	operator.clientca_configmap_controller	controller/controller.go:298	reconciling	{"request": "openshift-ingress-operator/service-bdrc"}
2022-07-20T23:36:26.943Z	INFO	operator.crl	crl/crl_configmap.go:69	certificate revocation list has expired	{"subject key identifier": "6aa909992e9890457b2a8de5659a44cab8e867a8"}
2022-07-20T23:36:26.943Z	INFO	operator.crl	crl/crl_configmap.go:69	retrieving certificate revocation list	{"subject key identifier": "6aa909992e9890457b2a8de5659a44cab8e867a8"}
2022-07-20T23:36:26.943Z	INFO	operator.crl	crl/crl_configmap.go:169	retrieving CRL distribution point	{"distribution point": "http://crl.domain.com/der/CN=XXXX,OU=XXX,O=XXX,C=XXX"}

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.9.33

How reproducible:
Enable mTLS with a CRL

Actual results:
CRL is not download when expired
Clients get "SSL client certificate not trusted" errors while accessing resources

Expected results:
ingress-operator triggers CRL download when approaching expiration date so that the configmap is updated without manual action

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6764. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
The "Add Git Repository" has a "Show configuration options" expandable section that shows the required permissions for a webhook setup, and provides a link to "read more about setting up webhook".

But the permission section shows nothing when open this second expandable section, and the link doesn't do anything until the user enters a "supported" GitHub, GitLab or BitBucket URL.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11-4.13

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Install Pipelines operator
  2. Navigate to the Developer perspective > Pipelines
  3. Press "Create" and select "Repository"
  4. Click on "Show configuration options"
  5. Click on "See Git permissions"
  6. Click on "Read more about setting up webhook"

Actual results:

  1. The Git permission section shows no git permissions.
  2. The Read more link doesn't open any new page.

Expected results:

  1. The Git permission section should show some info or must not be disabled.
  2. The Read more link should open a page or must not be displayed as well.

Additional info:

  1. None

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-78. The following is the description of the original issue:

Copied from an upstream issue: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager/issues/2830

What did you do?

When attempting to reinstall an operator that uses conversion webhooks by

  • Deleting the operator subscription and any CSVs associated with it
  • Recreating the operator subscription

The resulting InstallPlan enters a failed state with message similar to

error validating existing CRs against new CRD's schema for "devworkspaces.workspace.devfile.io": error listing resources in GroupVersionResource schema.GroupVersionResource{Group:"workspace.devfile.io", Version:"v1alpha1", Resource:"devworkspaces"}: conversion webhook for workspace.devfile.io/v1alpha2, Kind=DevWorkspace failed: Post "https://devworkspace-controller-manager-service.test-namespace.svc:443/convert?timeout=30s": service "devworkspace-controller-manager-service" not found

When the original CSVs are deleted, the operator's main deployment and service are removed, but CRDs are left in-cluster. However, since the service/CA bundle/deployment that serve the conversion webhook are removed, conversion webhooks are broken at that point. Eventually this impacts garbage collection on the cluster as well.

This can be reproduced by installing the DevWorkspace Operator from the Red Hat catalog. (I can provide yamls/upstream images that reproduce as well, if that's helpful). It may be necessary to create a DevWorkspace in the cluster before deletion, e.g. by oc apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/devfile/devworkspace-operator/main/samples/plain.yaml

What did you expect to see?
Operator is able to be reinstalled without removing CRDs and all instances.

What did you see instead? Under which circumstances?
It's necessary to completely remove the operator including CRDs. For our operator (DevWorkspace), this also makes uninstall especially complicated as finalizers are used (so CRDs cannot be deleted if the controller is removed, and the controller cannot be restored by reinstalling)

Environment

operator-lifecycle-manager version: 4.10.24

Kubernetes version information: Kubernetes Version: v1.23.5+012e945 (OpenShift 4.10.24)

Kubernetes cluster kind: OpenShift

Description of problem: This is a follow-up to OCPBUGS-2795 and OCPBUGS-2941.

The installer fails to destroy the cluster when the OpenStack object storage omits 'content-type' from responses. This can happen on responses with HTTP status code 204, where a reverse proxy is truncating content-related headers (see this nginX bug report). In such cases, the Installer errors with:

level=error msg=Bulk deleting of container "5ifivltb-ac890-chr5h-image-registry-fnxlmmhiesrfvpuxlxqnkoxdbl" objects failed: Cannot extract names from response with content-type: []

Listing container object suffers from the same issue as listing the containers and this one isn't fixed in latest versions of gophercloud. I've reported https://github.com/gophercloud/gophercloud/issues/2509 and fixing it with https://github.com/gophercloud/gophercloud/issues/2510, however we likely won't be able to backport the bump to gophercloud master back to release-4.8 so we'll have to look for alternatives.

I'm setting the priority to critical as it's causing all our jobs to fail in master.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.8.z

How reproducible:

Likely not happening in customer environments where Swift is exposed directly. We're seeing the issue in our CI where we're using a non-RHOSP managed cloud.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

When queried dns hostname from certain pod on the certain node, responded from random coredns pod, not prefer local one. Is it expected result ?

# In OCP v4.8.13 case
// Ran dig command on the certain node which is running the following test-7cc4488d48-tqc4m pod.
sh-4.4# while : ; do echo -n "$(date '+%H:%M:%S') :"; dig google.com +short; sleep 1; done
:
07:16:33 :172.217.175.238
07:16:34 :172.217.175.238 <--- Refreshed the upstream result
07:16:36 :142.250.207.46
07:16:37 :142.250.207.46

// The dig results is matched with the running node one as you can see the above one.
$ oc rsh  test-7cc4488d48-tqc4m bash -c 'while : ; do echo -n "$(date '+%H:%M:%S') :"; dig google.com +short; sleep 1; done'
:
07:16:35 :172.217.175.238 
07:16:36 :172.217.175.238 <--- At the same time, the pod dig result is also refreshed.
07:16:37 :142.250.207.46
07:16:38 :142.250.207.46


But in v4.10 case, in contrast, the dns query result is various and responded randomly regardless local dns results on the node as follows.

# In OCP v4.10.23 case, pod's response from DNS services are not consistent.
$ oc rsh test-848fcf8ddb-zrcbx  bash -c 'while : ; do echo -n "$(date '+%H:%M:%S') :"; dig google.com +short; sleep 1; done'
07:23:00 :142.250.199.110
07:23:01 :142.250.207.46
07:23:02 :142.250.207.46
07:23:03 :142.250.199.110
07:23:04 :142.250.199.110
07:23:05 :172.217.161.78

# Even though the node which is running the pod keep responding the same IP...
sh-4.4# while : ; do echo -n "$(date '+%H:%M:%S') :"; dig google.com +short; sleep 1; done
07:23:00 :172.217.161.78
07:23:01 :172.217.161.78
07:23:02 :172.217.161.78
07:23:03 :172.217.161.78
07:23:04 :172.217.161.78
07:23:05 :172.217.161.78

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

v4.10.23 (ROSA)
SDN: OpenShiftSDN

How reproducible:

You can always reproduce this issue using "dig google.com" from both any pod and the node the pod running according to the above "Description" details.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Run any usual pod, and check which node the pod is running on.
2. Run dig google.com on the pod and the node.
3. Check the IP is consistent with the running node each other. 

Actual results:

The response IPs are not consistent and random IP is responded.

Expected results:

The response IP is kind of consistent, and aware of prefer local dns.

Additional info:

This issue affects EgressNetworkPolicy dnsName feature.

Description of problem:

[OVN][OSP] After reboot egress node, egress IP cannot be applied anymore.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-11-07-181244

How reproducible:

Frequently happened in automation. But didn't reproduce it in manual.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Label one node as egress node

2.
Config one egressIP object
STEP: Check  one EgressIP assigned in the object.

Nov  8 15:28:23.591: INFO: egressIPStatus: [{"egressIP":"192.168.54.72","node":"huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q"}]

3.
Reboot the node, wait for the node ready.


Actual results:

EgressIP cannot be applied anymore. Waited more than 1 hour.
 oc get egressip
NAME             EGRESSIPS       ASSIGNED NODE   ASSIGNED EGRESSIPS
egressip-47031   192.168.54.72    

Expected results:

The egressIP should be applied correctly.

Additional info:


Some logs
E1108 07:29:41.849149       1 egressip.go:1635] No assignable nodes found for EgressIP: egressip-47031 and requested IPs: [192.168.54.72]
I1108 07:29:41.849288       1 event.go:285] Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"EgressIP", Namespace:"", Name:"egressip-47031", UID:"", APIVersion:"", ResourceVersion:"", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning' reason: 'NoMatchingNodeFound' no assignable nodes for EgressIP: egressip-47031, please tag at least one node with label: k8s.ovn.org/egress-assignable


W1108 07:33:37.401149       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:162] Could not connect to huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q (10.131.0.2:9107): context deadline exceeded
I1108 07:33:37.401348       1 master.go:1364] Adding or Updating Node "huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q"
I1108 07:33:37.437465       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q (10.131.0.2:9107)

After this log, seems like no logs related to "192.168.54.72" happened.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2438. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

On the alert details page and alerting rule details page, clicking on a field that has a popover help throws an uncaught JavaScript error.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Go to Observe > Alerting pages
2. Click on an alert (or go to the rules tab then click on a rule)
3. Click on one of the underlined fields (those that have a popover help)

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5092. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3314. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

triggers[].gitlab.secretReference[1] disappears when a 'buildconfig' is edited on ‘From View’

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.32

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Configure triggers[].gitlab.secretReference[1] as below 

~~~
spec:
 .. 
  triggers:
    - type: ConfigChange
    - type: GitLab
      gitlab:
        secretReference:
          name: m24s40-githook
~~~
2. Open ‘Edit BuildConfig’ buildconfig  with ‘From’ View:
 - Buildconfigs -> Actions -> Edit Buildconfig

3. Click ‘YAML view’ on top. 

Actual results:

The 'secretReference' configured earlier has disappeared. You can click [Reload] button which will bring the configuration back.

Expected results:

'secretReference' configured in buildconfigs do not disappear. 

Additional info:


[1]https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.10/rest_api/workloads_apis/buildconfig-build-openshift-io-v1.html#spec-triggers-gitlab-secretreference

 

Description of problem:

Upgrade OCP 4.11 --> 4.12 fails with one 'NotReady,SchedulingDisabled' node and MachineConfigDaemonFailed.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Upgrade from OCP 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532 on top of OSP RHOS-16.2-RHEL-8-20220804.n.1 to 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107.

Network Type: OVNKubernetes

How reproducible:

Twice out of two attempts.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OCP 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532 (IPI) on top of OSP RHOS-16.2-RHEL-8-20220804.n.1.
   The cluster is up and running with three workers:
   $ oc get clusterversion
   NAME      VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
   version   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532   True        False         51m     Cluster version is 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532

2. Run the OC command to upgrade to 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107:
$ oc adm upgrade --to-image=registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 --allow-explicit-upgrade --force=true
warning: Using by-tag pull specs is dangerous, and while we still allow it in combination with --force for backward compatibility, it would be much safer to pass a by-digest pull spec instead
warning: The requested upgrade image is not one of the available updates.You have used --allow-explicit-upgrade for the update to proceed anyway
warning: --force overrides cluster verification of your supplied release image and waives any update precondition failures.
Requesting update to release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 

3. The upgrade is not succeeds: [0]
$ oc get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532   True        True          17h     Unable to apply 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107: wait has exceeded 40 minutes for these operators: network

One node degrided to 'NotReady,SchedulingDisabled' status:
$ oc get nodes
NAME                          STATUS                        ROLES    AGE   VERSION
ostest-9vllk-master-0         Ready                         master   19h   v1.24.0+07c9eb7
ostest-9vllk-master-1         Ready                         master   19h   v1.24.0+07c9eb7
ostest-9vllk-master-2         Ready                         master   19h   v1.24.0+07c9eb7
ostest-9vllk-worker-0-4x4pt   NotReady,SchedulingDisabled   worker   18h   v1.24.0+3882f8f
ostest-9vllk-worker-0-h6kcs   Ready                         worker   18h   v1.24.0+3882f8f
ostest-9vllk-worker-0-xhz9b   Ready                         worker   18h   v1.24.0+3882f8f

$ oc get pods -A | grep -v -e Completed -e Running
NAMESPACE                                          NAME                                                         READY   STATUS      RESTARTS       AGE
openshift-openstack-infra                          coredns-ostest-9vllk-worker-0-4x4pt                          0/2     Init:0/1    0              18h
 
$ oc get events
LAST SEEN   TYPE      REASON                                        OBJECT            MESSAGE
7m15s       Warning   OperatorDegraded: MachineConfigDaemonFailed   /machine-config   Unable to apply 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107: failed to apply machine config daemon manifests: error during waitForDaemonsetRollout: [timed out waiting for the condition, daemonset machine-config-daemon is not ready. status: (desired: 6, updated: 6, ready: 5, unavailable: 1)]
7m15s       Warning   MachineConfigDaemonFailed                     /machine-config   Cluster not available for [{operator 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532}]: failed to apply machine config daemon manifests: error during waitForDaemonsetRollout: [timed out waiting for the condition, daemonset machine-config-daemon is not ready. status: (desired: 6, updated: 6, ready: 5, unavailable: 1)]

$ oc get co
NAME                                       VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
authentication                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      18h    
baremetal                                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
cloud-controller-manager                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
cloud-credential                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
cluster-autoscaler                         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
config-operator                            4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
console                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      18h    
control-plane-machine-set                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      17h    
csi-snapshot-controller                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
dns                                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        True          False      19h     DNS "default" reports Progressing=True: "Have 5 available node-resolver pods, want 6."
etcd                                       4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
image-registry                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        True          False      18h     Progressing: The registry is ready...
ingress                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      18h    
insights                                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
kube-apiserver                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        True          False      18h     NodeInstallerProgressing: 1 nodes are at revision 11; 2 nodes are at revision 13
kube-controller-manager                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
kube-scheduler                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
kube-storage-version-migrator              4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
machine-api                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
machine-approver                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
machine-config                             4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532   False       True          True       16h     Cluster not available for [{operator 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532}]: failed to apply machine config daemon manifests: error during waitForDaemonsetRollout: [timed out waiting for the condition, daemonset machine-config-daemon is not ready. status: (desired: 6, updated: 6, ready: 5, unavailable: 1)]
marketplace                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
monitoring                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      18h    
network                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        True          True       19h     DaemonSet "/openshift-ovn-kubernetes/ovnkube-node" rollout is not making progress - last change 2022-09-20T14:16:13Z...
node-tuning                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      17h    
openshift-apiserver                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      18h    
openshift-controller-manager               4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      17h    
openshift-samples                          4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      17h    
operator-lifecycle-manager                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
service-ca                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
storage                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        True          False      19h     ManilaCSIDriverOperatorCRProgressing: ManilaDriverNodeServiceControllerProgressing: Waiting for DaemonSet to deploy node pods...

[0] http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/1074531

Actual results:

OCP 4.11 --> 4.12 upgrade fails.

Expected results:

OCP 4.11 --> 4.12 upgrade success.

Additional info:

Attached logs of the NotReady node - [^journalctl_ostest-9vllk-worker-0-4x4pt.log.tar.gz]

Description of problem:

If we use a macvlan with the configuration...
spec:
  config: '{ "cniVersion": "0.3.1", "name": "ran-bh-macvlan-test", "plugins": [ {"type": "macvlan","master": "vlan306", "mode": "bridge", "ipam": { "type": "whereabouts", "range": "2001:1b74:480:603d:0304:0403:000:0000-2001:1b74:480:603d:0304:0403:0000:0004/64","gateway": "2001:1b74:480:603d::1" } } ]}'

there is an error creating the pod:

  Warning  FailedCreatePodSandBox  17s (x3 over 55s)  kubelet            (combined from similar events): Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_test31_test-ecoloma-01_a593bd0a-83e7-4d31-857e-0c31491e849e_0(5cf36bd99ffa532fd34735e68caecfbc69d820ba6cb04e348c9f9f168498022f): error adding pod test-ecoloma-01_test31 to CNI network "multus-cni-network": [test-ecoloma-01/test31:ran-bh-macvlan-test]: error adding container to network "ran-bh-macvlan-test": Error at storage engine: OverlappingRangeIPReservation.whereabouts.cni.cncf.io "2001-1b74-480-603d-304-403--" is invalid: metadata.name: Invalid value: "2001-1b74-480-603d-304-403--": a lowercase RFC 1123 subdomain must consist of lower case alphanumeric characters, '-' or '.', and must start and end with an alphanumeric character (e.g. 'example.com', regex used for validation is '[a-z0-9]([-a-z0-9]*[a-z0-9])?(\.[a-z0-9]([-a-z0-9]*[a-z0-9])?)*')
  
  
If we change the start IP address to 2001:1b74:480:603d:0304:0403:000:0001, it works ok ok.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13

How reproducible:

Always reproducible

Steps to Reproduce:

1. See description of problem.

Actual results:

Unable to create pod

Expected results:

IP range should be valid and pod should get created

Additional info:

 

During initial backporting, due to a number of other colliding commits in upstream, the cobra commands facilitating caching did not get downstreamed. 

This is to downstream those two lines.

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1522. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Normal user cannot open the debug container from the pods(crashLoopbackoff) they created, And would be got error message:
pods "<pod name>" is forbidden: cannot set blockOwnerDeletion if an ownerReference refers to a resource you can't set finalizers on: , <nil>

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107, 4.11.z, 4.10.z

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Login OCP as a normal user
   eg: flexy-htpasswd-provider
2. Create a project, go to Developer prespective -> +Add page
3. Click "Import from Git", and provide below data to get a Pods with CrashLoopBackOff state
   Git Repo URL: https://github.com/sclorg/nodejs-ex.git
   Name: nodejs-ex-git
   Run command: star a wktw
4. Navigate to /k8s/ns/<project name>/pods page, find the pod with CrashLoopBackOff status, and go to it details page -> Logs Tab
5. Click the link of "Debug container"
6. Check if the Debug container can be opened

Actual results:

6. Error message would be shown on page, user cannot open debug container via UI
   pods "nodejs-ex-git-6dd986d8bd-9h2wj-debug-tkqk2" is forbidden: cannot set blockOwnerDeletion if an ownerReference refers to a resource you can't set finalizers on: , <nil>

Expected results:

6. Normal user could use debug container without any error message

Additional info:

The debug container could be created for the normal user successfully via CommandLine
 $ oc debug <crashloopbackoff pod name> -n <project name>

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3111. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2992. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

The metal3-ironic container image in OKD fails during steps in configure-ironic.sh that look for additional Oslo configuration entries as environment variables to configure the Ironic instance. The mechanism by which it fails in OKD but not OpenShift is that the image for OpenShift happens to have unrelated variables set which match the regex, because it is based on the builder image, but the OKD image is based only on a stream8 image without these unrelated OS_ prefixed variables set.

The metal3 pod created in response to even a provisioningNetwork: Disabled Provisioning object will therefore crashloop indefinitely.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy OKD to a bare metal cluster using the assisted-service, with the OKD ConfigMap applied to podman play kube, as in :https://github.com/openshift/assisted-service/tree/master/deploy/podman#okd-configuration
2. Observe the state of the metal3 pod in the openshift-machine-api namespace.

Actual results:

The metal3-ironic container repeatedly exits with nonzero, with the logs ending here:

++ export IRONIC_URL_HOST=10.1.1.21
++ IRONIC_URL_HOST=10.1.1.21
++ export IRONIC_BASE_URL=https://10.1.1.21:6385
++ IRONIC_BASE_URL=https://10.1.1.21:6385
++ export IRONIC_INSPECTOR_BASE_URL=https://10.1.1.21:5050
++ IRONIC_INSPECTOR_BASE_URL=https://10.1.1.21:5050
++ '[' '!' -z '' ']'
++ '[' -f /etc/ironic/ironic.conf ']'
++ cp /etc/ironic/ironic.conf /etc/ironic/ironic.conf_orig
++ tee /etc/ironic/ironic.extra
# Options set from Environment variables
++ echo '# Options set from Environment variables'
++ env
++ grep '^OS_'
++ tee -a /etc/ironic/ironic.extra

Expected results:

The metal3-ironic container starts and the metal3 pod is reported as ready.

Additional info:

This is the PR that introduced pipefail to the downstream ironic-image, which is not yet accepted in the upstream:
https://github.com/openshift/ironic-image/pull/267/files#diff-ab2b20df06f98d48f232d90f0b7aa464704257224862780635ec45b0ce8a26d4R3

This is the line that's failing:
https://github.com/openshift/ironic-image/blob/4838a077d849070563b70761957178055d5d4517/scripts/configure-ironic.sh#L57

This is the image base that OpenShift uses for ironic-image (before rewriting in ci-operator):
https://github.com/openshift/ironic-image/blob/4838a077d849070563b70761957178055d5d4517/Dockerfile.ocp#L9

Here is where the relevant environment variables are set in the builder images for OCP:
https://github.com/openshift/builder/blob/973602e0e576d7eccef4fc5810ba511405cd3064/hack/lib/build/version.sh#L87

Here is the final FROM line in the OKD image build (just stream8):
https://github.com/openshift/ironic-image/blob/4838a077d849070563b70761957178055d5d4517/Dockerfile.okd#L9

This results in the following differences between the two images:
$ podman run --rm -it --entrypoint bash quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:519ac06836d972047f311de5e57914cf842716e22a1d916a771f02499e0f235c -c 'env | grep ^OS_'
OS_GIT_MINOR=11
OS_GIT_TREE_STATE=clean
OS_GIT_COMMIT=97530a7
OS_GIT_VERSION=4.11.0-202210061001.p0.g97530a7.assembly.stream-97530a7
OS_GIT_MAJOR=4
OS_GIT_PATCH=0
$ podman run --rm -it --entrypoint bash quay.io/openshift/okd-content@sha256:6b8401f8d84c4838cf0e7c598b126fdd920b6391c07c9409b1f2f17be6d6d5cb -c 'env | grep ^OS_'

Here is what the OS_ prefixed variables should be used for:
https://github.com/metal3-io/ironic-image/blob/807a120b4ce5e1675a79ebf3ee0bb817cfb1f010/README.md?plain=1#L36
https://opendev.org/openstack/oslo.config/src/commit/84478d83f87e9993625044de5cd8b4a18dfcaf5d/oslo_config/sources/_environment.py

It's worth noting that ironic.extra is not consumed anywhere, and is simply being used here to save off the variables that Oslo _might_ be consuming (it won't consume the variables that are present in the OCP builder image, though they do get caught by this regex).

With pipefail set, grep returns non-zero when it fails to find an environment variable that matches the regex, as in the case of the OKD ironic-image builds.

 

Description of problem:

Remove the self-provisioner role for the system authenticated users as per  https://access.redhat.com/solutions/4040541 to stop users from having the ability to create new projects, but the customer has found this is only partially working. It appears that when you use cluster Web UI Administrator view, the "Create Project" button is not available but switching to the default Developer view default user can create a project

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Follow https://access.redhat.com/solutions/1529893

Steps to Reproduce:

1. oc adm policy remove-cluster-role-from-group self-provisioner system:authenticated:oauth
2. log back in as user and switch between admin/Dev view
3. User still has link showing in Dev console

Actual results:

Create new project link still exists

Expected results:

Create new project link should be removed, similar to Admin Console

 

Additional info:

Although the loink still exists, the user get's a correct permission denied message.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-669. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

This is an OCP clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099794

In summary, NetworkManager reports the network as being up before the ipv6 address of the primary interface is ready and crio fails to bind to it.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

Disconnected IPI OCP 4.10.22 cluster install on baremetal fails when hostname of master nodes does not include "master"    

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.10.22

How reproducible:  Perform disconnected IPI install of OCP 4.10.22 on bare metal with master nodes that do not contain the text "master"

Steps to Reproduce:

Perform disconnected IPI install of OCP 4.10.22 on bare metal with master nodes that do not contain the text "master"

Actual results: master nodes do come up.

Expected results: master nodes should come up despite that the text "master" is not in their hostname.

Additional info:

Disconnected IPI OCP 4.10.22 cluster install on baremetal fails when hostname of master nodes does not include "master"    

The code for the cluster-baremetal-operator at the following link: 

https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/blob/49d7b249c5dcef8228f206eff4530a25f03b201f/controllers/provisioning_controller.go#L441

The following condition is concerning:

if strings.Contains(bmh.Name, "master") && len(bmh.Spec.BootMACAddress) > 0

The packages reveal that bmh.Name references the name inside the metadata of the BMH object. 

Should a customer have masters with names that do not include the text "master", the above condition can never become true, and so, the following slice is never created :

macs = append(macs, bmh.Spec.BootMACAddress)

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-13739. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-13692. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-13549. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Incorrect AWS ARN [1] is used for GovCloud and AWS China regions, which will cause the command `ccoctl aws create-all` to fail:

Failed to create Identity provider: failed to apply public access policy to the bucket ci-op-bb5dgq54-77753-oidc: MalformedPolicy: Policy has invalid resource
	status code: 400, request id: VNBZ3NYDH6YXWFZ3, host id: pHF8v7C3vr9YJdD9HWamFmRbMaOPRbHSNIDaXUuUyrgy0gKCO9DDFU/Xy8ZPmY2LCjfLQnUDmtQ=

Correct AWS ARN prefix:
GovCloud (us-gov-east-1 and us-gov-west-1): arn:aws-us-gov
AWS China (cn-north-1 and cn-northwest-1): arn:aws-cn

[1] https://github.com/openshift/cloud-credential-operator/pull/526/files#diff-1909afc64595b92551779d9be99de733f8b694cfb6e599e49454b380afc58876R211


 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2023-05-11-024616

How reproducible:

Always
 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Run command: `aws create-all --name="${infra_name}" --region="${REGION}" --credentials-requests-dir="/tmp/credrequests" --output-dir="/tmp"` on GovCloud regions
2.
3.

Actual results:

Failed to create Identity provider
 

Expected results:

Create resources successfully.
 

Additional info:

Related PRs:
4.10: https://github.com/openshift/cloud-credential-operator/pull/531
4.11: https://github.com/openshift/cloud-credential-operator/pull/530
4.12: https://github.com/openshift/cloud-credential-operator/pull/529
4.13: https://github.com/openshift/cloud-credential-operator/pull/528
4.14: https://github.com/openshift/cloud-credential-operator/pull/526
 

Description of problem:
In a complete disconnected cluster, the dev catalog is taking too much time in loading

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. A complete disconnected cluster
2. In add page go to the All services page
3.

Actual results:
Taking too much time too load

Expected results:
Time taken should be reduced

Additional info:
Attached a gif for reference

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5016. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When editing any pipeline in the openshift console, the correct content cannot be obtained (the obtained information is the initial information).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

Developer -> Pipeline -> select pipeline -> Details -> Actions -> Edit Pipeline -> YAML view -> Cancel ->  Actions -> Edit Pipeline -> YAML view 

Actual results:

displayed content is incorrect.

Expected results:

Get the content of the current pipeline, not the "pipeline create" content.

Additional info:

If cancel or save in the "Pipeline Builder" interface after "Edit Pipeline", can get the expected content.
~
Developer -> Pipeline -> select pipeline -> Details -> Actions -> Edit Pipeline -> Pipeline builder -> Cancel ->  Actions -> Edit Pipeline -> YAML view :Display resource content normally
~

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-884. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Since the decomissioning of the psi cluster, and subsequent move of the rhcos release browser, product builds machine-os-images builds have been failing. See e.g. https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/taskinfo?taskID=47565717

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12, 4.11, 4.10.

How reproducible:

Have ART build the image

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Have ART build the image

Actual results:

Build failure

Expected results:

Build succesful

Additional info:


This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-13013. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12854. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11550. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

`cluster-reader` ClusterRole should have ["get", "list", "watch"] permissions for a number of privileged CRs, but lacks them for the API Group "k8s.ovn.org", which includes CRs such as EgressFirewalls, EgressIPs, etc.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.10 - 4.12 OVN

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a cluster with OVN components, e.g. EgressFirewall
2. Check permissions of ClusterRole `cluster-reader`

Actual results:

No permissions for OVN resources 

Expected results:

Get, list, and watch verb permissions for OVN resources

Additional info:

Looks like a similar bug was opened for "network-attachment-definitions" in OCPBUGS-6959 (whose closure is being contested).

Description of problem:

PROXY protocol cannot be enabled for the "Private" endpoint publishing strategy type.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.0+. PROXY protocol was made configurable for the "HostNetwork" and "NodePortService" endpoint publishing strategy types, but not for "Private", in this release.

How reproducible:

Always.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create an ingresscontroller with the "Private" endpoint publishing strategy type:

oc create -f - <<'EOF'
apiVersion: operator.openshift.io/v1
kind: IngressController
metadata:
  name: example
  namespace: openshift-ingress-operator
spec:
  domain: example.com
  endpointPublishingStrategy:
    type: Private
    private:
      protocol: PROXY
EOF

2. Check the ingresscontroller's status:

oc -n openshift-ingress-operator get ingresscontrollers/example -o 'jsonpath={.status.endpointPublishingStrategy}'

3. Check whether the resulting router deployment has PROXY protocol enabled.

oc -n openshift-ingress get deployments/router-example -o 'jsonpath={.spec.template.spec.containers[0].env[?(@.name=="ROUTER_USE_PROXY_PROTOCOL")]}'

Actual results:

The ingresscontroller is created:

ingresscontroller.operator.openshift.io/example created

The status shows that the spec.endpointPublishingStrategy.private.protocol setting was ignored:

{"private":{},"type":"Private"}

The deployment does not enable PROXY protocol; the oc get command prints no output.

Expected results:

The ingresscontroller's status should indicate that PROXY protocol is enabled:

{"private":{"protocol":"PROXY"},"type":"Private"}

The deployment should have PROXY protocol enabled:

{"name":"ROUTER_USE_PROXY_PROTOCOL","value":"true"}

Additional info:

This bug report duplicates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104481 in order to facilitate backports.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4250. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Added a script to collect PodNetworkConnectivityChecks to able to view the overall status of the pod network connectivity.

Current must-gather collects the contents of `openshift-network-diagnostics` but does not collect the PodNetworkConnectivityCheck.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12, 4.11, 4.10

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6671. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3228. The following is the description of the original issue:

While starting a Pipelinerun using UI, and in the process of providing the values on "Start Pipeline" , the IBM Power Customer (Deepak Shetty from IBM) has tried creating credentials under "Advanced options" with "Image Registry Credentials" (Authenticaion type). When the IBM Customer verified the credentials from  Secrets tab (in Workloads) , the secret was found in broken state. Screenshot of the broken secret is attached. 

The issue has been observed on OCP4.8, OCP4.9 and OCP4.10.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10943. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10661. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10591. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Starting with 4.12.0-0.nightly-2023-03-13-172313, the machine API operator began receiving an invalid version tag either due to a missing or invalid VERSION_OVERRIDE(https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-operator/blob/release-4.12/hack/go-build.sh#L17-L20) value being passed tot he build.

This is resulting in all jobs invoked by the 4.12 nightlies failing to install.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2023-03-13-172313 and later

How reproducible:

consistently in 4.12 nightlies only(ci builds do not seem to be impacted).

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

Example of failure https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-aws-csi/1635331349046890496/artifacts/e2e-aws-csi/gather-extra/artifacts/pods/openshift-machine-api_machine-api-operator-866d7647bd-6lhl4_machine-api-operator.log

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5761. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5458. The following is the description of the original issue:

reported in https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C027U68LP/p1673010878672479

Description of problem:

Hey guys, I have a openshift cluster that was upgraded to version 4.9.58 from version 4.8. After the upgrade was done, the etcd pod on master1 isn't coming up and is crashlooping. and it gives the following error: {"level":"fatal","ts":"2023-01-06T12:12:58.709Z","caller":"etcdmain/etcd.go:204","msg":"discovery failed","error":"wal: max entry size limit exceeded, recBytes: 13279, fileSize(313430016) - offset(313418480) - padBytes(1) = entryLimit(11535)","stacktrace":"go.etcd.io/etcd/server/v3/etcdmain.startEtcdOrProxyV2\n\t/remote-source/cachito-gomod-with-deps/app/server/etcdmain/etcd.go:204\ngo.etcd.io/etcd/server/v3/etcdmain.Main\n\t/remote-source/cachito-gomod-with-deps/app/server/etcdmain/main.go:40\nmain.main\n\t/remote-source/cachito-gomod-with-deps/app/server/main.go:32\nruntime.main\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/proc.go:225"}

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:


Description of problem:

For OVNK to become CNCF complaint, we need to support session affinity timeout feature and enable the e2e's on OpenShift side. This bug tracks the efforts to get this into 4.12 OCP.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4072. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4026. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
There is an endless re-render loop and a browser feels slow to stuck when opening the add page or the topology.

Saw also endless API calls to /api/kubernetes/apis/binding.operators.coreos.com/v1alpha1/bindablekinds/bindable-kinds

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1. Console UI 4.12-4.13 (master)
2. Service Binding Operator (tested with 1.3.1)

How reproducible:
Always with installed SBO

But the "stuck feeling" depends on the browser (Firefox feels more stuck) and your locale machine power

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install Service Binding Operator
2. Create or update the BindableKinds resource "bindable-kinds"

apiVersion: binding.operators.coreos.com/v1alpha1
kind: BindableKinds
metadata:
  name: bindable-kinds

3. Open the browser console log
4. Open the console UI and navigate to the add page

Actual results:
1. Saw endless API calls to /api/kubernetes/apis/binding.operators.coreos.com/v1alpha1/bindablekinds/bindable-kinds
2. Browser feels slow and get stuck after some time
3. The page crashs after some time

Expected results:
1. The API call should be called just once
2. The add page should just work without feeling laggy
3. No crash

Additional info:
Get introduced after we watching the bindable-kinds resource with https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11161

It looks like this happen only if the SBO is installed and the bindable-kinds resource exist, but doesn't contain any status.

The status list all available bindable resource types. I could not reproduce this by installing and uninstalling an operator, but you can manually create or update this resource as mentioned above.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7474. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6714. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Traffic from egress IPs was interrupted after Cluster patch to Openshift 4.10.46

a customer cluster was patched. It is an Openshift 4.10.46 cluster with SDN.

More description about issue is available in private comment below since it contains customer data.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2508. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Installer fails due to Neutron policy error when creating Openstack servers for OCP master nodes.

$ oc get machines -A
NAMESPACE               NAME                          PHASE          TYPE   REGION   ZONE   AGE
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-master-0         Running                               23h
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-master-1         Running                               23h
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-master-2         Running                               23h
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-g7nrw   Provisioning                          23h
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-lrkvb   Provisioning                          23h
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-vwrsk   Provisioning                          23h

$ oc -n openshift-machine-api logs machine-api-controllers-7454f5d65b-8fqx2 -c machine-controller
[...]
E1018 10:51:49.355143       1 controller.go:317] controller/machine_controller "msg"="Reconciler error" "error"="error creating Openstack instance: Failed to create port err: Request forbidden: [POST https://overcloud.redhat.local:13696/v2.0/ports], error message: {\"NeutronError\": {\"type\": \"PolicyNotAuthorized\", \"message\": \"(rule:create_port and (rule:create_port:allowed_address_pairs and (rule:create_port:allowed_address_pairs:ip_address and rule:create_port:allowed_address_pairs:ip_address))) is disallowed by policy\", \"detail\": \"\"}}" "name"="ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-lrkvb" "namespace"="openshift-machine-api"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-10-14-023020

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install 4.10 within provider networks (in primary or secondary interface)

Actual results:

Installation failure:
4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-10-14-023020: some cluster operators have not yet rolled out

Expected results:

Successful installation

Additional info:

Please find must-gather for installation on primary interface link here and for installation on secondary interface link here.

 

Description of problem:

The path used by --rotated-pod-logs to gather the rotated pod logs from /var/log/pods node folder via /api/v1/nodes/${NODE}/proxy/logs/${LOG_PATH} is only valid for regular pods but not for static pods.

The main problem is that, while normal pods have their rotated logs at this /var/log/pods/${POD_NAME}_${POD_UID_IN_API}/${CONTAINER_NAME}, static pods have them at /var/log/pods/${POD_NAME}_${CONFIG_HASH}/${CONTAINER_NAME} because the UID cannot be known at the time that the static pod is born (because static pods are created by kubelet before registering them in the kube-apiserver, and UID is assigned by the kube-apiserver).

The visible results of that are:

  • Spurious errors of not found resources related to the pods.
  • Rotated pod logs are not gathered even if present.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10

How reproducible:

Always if there are static pods.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. oc adm inspect --rotated-pod-logs ns/openshift-etcd (or any other project with static pods).

Actual results:

  • Rotated pods not gathered.
  • Errors like these
    error: errors occurred while gathering data:
        one or more errors occurred while gathering pod-specific data for namespace: openshift-etcd
    
        [one or more errors occurred while gathering container data for pod etcd-master-0.example.net:
    
        the server could not find the requested resource, one or more errors occurred while gathering container data for pod etcd-master-1.example.net:
    
        the server could not find the requested resource, one or more errors occurred while gathering container data for pod etcd-master-2.example.net:
    
        the server could not find the requested resource]
    

Expected results:

No errors like the ones above and rotated pod logs to be gathered, if present.

Additional info:

Despite being marked as experimental, this --rotated-pod-logs is used in must-gather, so this issue can be easily reproduced by just running a default must-gather. I focused on bare oc adm inspect reproducers for simplicity.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2075. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

We got a feedback from the support team that it is confusing to see switch in the Notifications column for the Alerting rule which have no alerts associated to it as user can not silence the Alerting rule. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. oc apply -f https://gist.githubusercontent.com/vikram-raj/727629797eb9d9bfcfa2721cae2ade86/raw/7c2305e14115a1a4f4f88ebb74cdad32cbec4132/Alerting%2520rule%2520without%2520alert 
2. navigate to the Developer perspective Observe -> Alerts
3. Try to silence the VersionAlert alerting rule, nothing will happen 

Actual results:

Silence the alerting rule using the switch will do nothing

Expected results:

No switch for silence the alerting rule should be visible if no alerts are associated to the alerting rule.

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-8016. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1748. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

PipelineRun templates are currently fetched from `openshift-pipelines` namespace. It has to be fetched from `openshift` namespace.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11 and 1.8.1 OSP

Align with operator changes https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SRVKP-2413 in 1.8.1, UI has to update the code to fetch pipelinerun templates from openshift namespace.

Description of problem:

Setting disableNetworkDiagnostics: true does not persist when network-operator pod gets re-created.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11.0-rc.0

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. $ oc patch network.operator.openshift.io/cluster --patch '{"spec":{"disableNetworkDiagnostics":true}}' --type=merge
network.operator.openshift.io/cluster patched

2. $ oc -n openshift-network-operator delete pods network-operator-9b68954c6-bclx6
pod "network-operator-9b68954c6-bclx6" deleted

3. $ oc get network.operator.openshift.io cluster -o json | jq .spec.disableNetworkDiagnostics
false

Actual results:
disableNetworkDiagnostics set to false, not set to true as configured in step 1

Expected results:
disableNetworkDiagnostics set to true

Additional info:

Attaching must-gather.

Description of problem:

After setting the appsDomain flag in the OpenShift Ingress configuration, all Routes that are generated are based off this domain.

This includes OpenShift-core Routes, which can result in failing health-checks, such as seen with the OpenShift Web Console.

According to the documentation[0], the appsDomain value should only be used by user-created Routes and is not intended to be seen when Openshift components are reconciled.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


OpenShift 4.12

How reproducible:

Everytime

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Provision a new cluster
2. Configure appsDomain value
3. Delete the OpenShift Console Route:
     oc delete routes -n openshift-console console
4. The Route is automatically reconciled

Actual results:

The re-created Route uses the appsDomain value, resulting in failed health-checks throughout the cluster.

Expected results:

The Console and all other OpenShift-core components should use the default domain.

Additional info:

Reviewing the appsDomain code, if the appsDomain value is configured this takes precedent for all Routes. [3][1][2]


Resources:
[0] https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.9/networking/ingress-operator.html#nw-ingress-configuring-application-domain_configuring-ingress
[1] Sets Route Subdomain to appsdomain if it's present, otherwise uses the default domain
    https://github.com/openshift/cluster-openshift-apiserver-operator/blob/d2182396d647839f61b027602578ac31c9437e7d/pkg/operator/configobservation/ingresses/observe_ingresses.go#L16-L60
[2] Sets up the Route generator
    https://github.com/openshift/openshift-apiserver/blob/9c381fc873b35c074f7c0c485893e038828c1405/pkg/cmd/openshift-apiserver/openshiftapiserver/config.go#L217-L218
[3] Where Route.spec.host is generated:
    https://github.com/openshift/openshift-apiserver/blob/9c381fc873b35c074f7c0c485893e038828c1405/vendor/github.com/openshift/library-go/pkg/route/hostassignment/plugin.go#L22-L47


This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-683. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

{ 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-21-135326 }
How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

{See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118563#c5,
The following messages here are "normal" on startup, but it is very misleading with error statement, suggest suppress them or update them to some more clear context that we can know they are in normal process.

E0818 02:18:53.709223       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.715530       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.735885       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.775984       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.790449       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.856911       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.950782       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.017583       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.271967       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.338944       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.916988       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.982211       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue}


Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:


Description of problem:

TO address: 'Static Pod is managed but errored" err="managed container xxx does not have Resource.Requests'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:
When creating a incomplete ClusterServiceVersion resource the OLM details page crashes (on 4.11).

apiVersion: operators.coreos.com/v1alpha1
kind: ClusterServiceVersion
metadata:
  name: minimal-csv
  namespace: christoph
spec:
  apiservicedefinitions:
    owned:
      - group: A
        kind: A
        name: A
        version: v1
  customresourcedefinitions:
    owned:
      - kind: B
        name: B
        version: v1
  displayName: My minimal CSV
  install:
    strategy: ''

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Crashes on 4.8-4.11, work fine from 4.12 onwards.

How reproducible:
Alway

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Apply the ClusterServiceVersion YAML from above
2. Open the Admin perspective > Installed Operator > Operator detail page

Actual results:
Details page crashes on tab A and B.

Expected results:
Page should not crash

Additional info:
Thi is a follow up on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2084287

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-855. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When setting the allowedregistries like the example below, the openshift-samples operator is degraded:

oc get image.config.openshift.io/cluster -o yaml
apiVersion: config.openshift.io/v1
kind: Image
metadata:
  annotations:
    release.openshift.io/create-only: "true"
  creationTimestamp: "2020-12-16T15:48:20Z"
  generation: 2
  name: cluster
  resourceVersion: "422284920"
  uid: d406d5a0-c452-4a84-b6b3-763abb51d7a5
spec:
  additionalTrustedCA:
    name: registry-ca
  allowedRegistriesForImport:
  - domainName: quay.io
    insecure: false
  - domainName: registry.redhat.io
    insecure: false
  - domainName: registry.access.redhat.com
    insecure: false
  - domainName: registry.redhat.io/redhat/redhat-operator-index
    insecure: true
  - domainName: registry.redhat.io/redhat/redhat-marketplace-index
    insecure: true
  - domainName: registry.redhat.io/redhat/certified-operator-index
    insecure: true
  - domainName: registry.redhat.io/redhat/community-operator-index
    insecure: true
  registrySources:
    allowedRegistries:
    - quay.io
    - registry.redhat.io
    - registry.rijksapps.nl
    - registry.access.redhat.com
    - registry.redhat.io/redhat/redhat-operator-index
    - registry.redhat.io/redhat/redhat-marketplace-index
    - registry.redhat.io/redhat/certified-operator-index
    - registry.redhat.io/redhat/community-operator-index


oc get co
NAME                                       VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
authentication                             4.10.21   True        False         False      5d13h   
baremetal                                  4.10.21   True        False         False      450d    
cloud-controller-manager                   4.10.21   True        False         False      94d     
cloud-credential                           4.10.21   True        False         False      624d    
cluster-autoscaler                         4.10.21   True        False         False      624d    
config-operator                            4.10.21   True        False         False      624d    
console                                    4.10.21   True        False         False      42d     
csi-snapshot-controller                    4.10.21   True        False         False      31d     
dns                                        4.10.21   True        False         False      217d    
etcd                                       4.10.21   True        False         False      624d    
image-registry                             4.10.21   True        False         False      94d     
ingress                                    4.10.21   True        False         False      94d     
insights                                   4.10.21   True        False         False      104s    
kube-apiserver                             4.10.21   True        False         False      624d    
kube-controller-manager                    4.10.21   True        False         False      624d    
kube-scheduler                             4.10.21   True        False         False      624d    
kube-storage-version-migrator              4.10.21   True        False         False      31d     
machine-api                                4.10.21   True        False         False      624d    
machine-approver                           4.10.21   True        False         False      624d    
machine-config                             4.10.21   True        False         False      17d     
marketplace                                4.10.21   True        False         False      258d    
monitoring                                 4.10.21   True        False         False      161d    
network                                    4.10.21   True        False         False      624d    
node-tuning                                4.10.21   True        False         False      31d     
openshift-apiserver                        4.10.21   True        False         False      42d     
openshift-controller-manager               4.10.21   True        False         False      22d     
openshift-samples                          4.10.21   True        True          True       31d     Samples installation in error at 4.10.21: &errors.errorString{s:"global openshift image configuration prevents the creation of imagestreams using the registry "}
operator-lifecycle-manager                 4.10.21   True        False         False      624d    
operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog         4.10.21   True        False         False      624d    
operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver   4.10.21   True        False         False      31d     
service-ca                                 4.10.21   True        False         False      624d    
storage                                    4.10.21   True        False         False      113d  


After applying the fix as described here(  https://access.redhat.com/solutions/6547281 ) it is resolved:
oc patch configs.samples.operator.openshift.io cluster --type merge --patch '{"spec": {"samplesRegistry": "registry.redhat.io"}}'

But according the the BZ this should be fixed in 4.10.3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027745 but the issue is still occur in our 4.10.21 cluster:

oc get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.10.21   True        False         31d     Error while reconciling 4.10.21: the cluster operator openshift-samples is degraded

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

This is just a clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105570 for purposes of cherry-picking.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:
Cannot scale up worker node have deploying OCP 4.11.1 cluster via UPI on Azure

5h2m Warning FailedCreate machine/pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4 InvalidConfiguration: failed to reconcile machine "pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4": failed to create vm pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4: failure sending request for machine pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4: cannot create vm: compute.VirtualMachinesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=404 - Original Error: Code="NotFound" Message="The Image '/subscriptions/e639e479-2737-4b3d-b338-f1928f6429a1/resourceGroups/mlpipe-2163-azpln-rg/providers/Microsoft.Compute/images/pokus-2knkh-gen2' cannot be found in 'northeurope' region."

Customer would like to have the installer create machineset from the inital installation, therefore Kubernetes manifest files that define the worker machines were not removed during the installation.

Highlights:
Can I please let help verifying if these are the correct steps to have the initial installation created and manage the worker machines?Is there an explanation on how changing the image to -gen2 in [concat(parameters('baseName'),'-gen2')] from the 02_storage.json template can resolve the problem?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Environment:
OCP 4.11.1 UPI install on Azure using ARM
VM size:
bootstrap: Standard_D4s_v3
master: Standard_D4s_v3

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Following the step described in the document: Installing a cluster on Azure using ARM templates .

In the install-config.yaml, worker replicas was set to 0

compute:
- architecture: amd64
  hyperthreading: Enabled
  name: worker
  platform: {}
  replicas: 3   
controlPlane:
  architecture: amd64
  hyperthreading: Enabled
  name: master
  platform: {}
  replicas: 3

After creating the manifests described in this step: Creating the Kubernetes manifest and Ignition config files only control plane machines manifests were removed, worker machines manifests remain untouchedAfter three masters and three worker nodes were created by ARM templates, additional worker were added using machine sets via command

oc scale --replicas=1 machineset cluster-g7rzv-worker-francecentral1 -n openshift-machine-api` 

Actual results:
No addition node visible from `oc get nodes` and the following error occur:

5h2m Warning FailedCreate machine/pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4 InvalidConfiguration: failed to reconcile machine "pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4": failed to create vm pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4: failure sending request for machine pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4: cannot create vm: compute.VirtualMachinesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=404 - Original Error: Code="NotFound" Message="The Image '/subscriptions/e639e479-2737-4b3d-b338-f1928f6429a1/resourceGroups/mlpipe-2163-azpln-rg/providers/Microsoft.Compute/images/pokus-2knkh-gen2' cannot be found in 'northeurope' region."

The customer found out that this can be resolved if changing the -image to -gen2 in [concat(parameters('baseName'),'-gen2')] from the 02_storage.json template

Expected results:
The installer should be able to create and manage machineset

Additional info:
SFDC case #03304526

Slack discussion, might due to MAO not able to support UPI in Azure Thread1, Thread2
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1549. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

The cluster-dns-operator does not reconcile the openshift-dns namespace, which has been exposed as an issue in 4.12 due to the requirement for the namespace to have pod-security labels.

If a cluster has been incrementally updated from a version less than or equal to 4.9, the openshift-dns namespace will most likely not contain the required pod-security labels since the namespace was statically created when the cluster was installed with old namespace configuration.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always if cluster originally installed with v4.9 or less

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install v4.9
2. Upgrade to v4.12 (incrementally if required for upgrade path)
3. openshift-dns namespace will be missing pod-security labels

Actual results:

"oc get ns openshift-dns -o yaml" will show missing pod-security labels: 

apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
  annotations:
    openshift.io/node-selector: ""
    openshift.io/sa.scc.mcs: s0:c15,c0
    openshift.io/sa.scc.supplemental-groups: 1000210000/10000
    openshift.io/sa.scc.uid-range: 1000210000/10000
  creationTimestamp: "2020-05-21T19:36:15Z"
  labels:
    kubernetes.io/metadata.name: openshift-dns
    olm.operatorgroup.uid/3d42c0c1-01cd-4c55-bf88-864f041c7e7a: ""
    openshift.io/cluster-monitoring: "true"
    openshift.io/run-level: "0"
  name: openshift-dns
  resourceVersion: "3127555382"
  uid: 0fb4571e-952f-4bea-bc45-461beec54369
spec:
  finalizers:
  - kubernetes

Expected results:

pod-security labels should exist:
 
 labels:
    kubernetes.io/metadata.name: openshift-dns
    olm.operatorgroup.uid/3d42c0c1-01cd-4c55-bf88-864f041c7e7a: ""
    openshift.io/cluster-monitoring: "true"
    openshift.io/run-level: "0"
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit: privileged
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce: privileged
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn: privileged

Additional info:

Issue found in CI during upgrade

https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C03G7REB4JV/p1663676443155839 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6850. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6503. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

While looking into OCPBUGS-5505 I discovered that some 4.10->4.11 upgrade job runs perform an Admin Ack check, while some do not. 4.11 has a ack-4.11-kube-1.25-api-removals-in-4.12 gate, so these upgrade jobs sometimes test that Upgradeable goes false after the ugprade, and sometimes they do not. This is only determined by the polling race condition: the check is executed once per 10 minutes, and we cancel the polling after upgrade is completed. This means that in some cases we are lucky and manage to run one check before the cancel, and sometimes we are not and only check while still on the base version.

Example job that checked admin acks post-upgrade:
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/openshift-cluster-version-operator-880-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1611444032104304640

$ curl --silent https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/openshift-cluster-version-operator-880-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1611444032104304640/artifacts/e2e-azure-upgrade/openshift-e2e-test/artifacts/e2e.log | grep 'Waiting for Upgradeable to be AdminAckRequired'
Jan  6 21:16:40.153: INFO: Waiting for Upgradeable to be AdminAckRequired ...

Example job that did not check admin acks post-upgrade:
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/openshift-cluster-version-operator-880-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1611444033509396480

$ curl --silent https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/openshift-cluster-version-operator-880-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1611444033509396480/artifacts/e2e-azure-upgrade/openshift-e2e-test/artifacts/e2e.log | grep 'Waiting for Upgradeable to be AdminAckRequired'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11+ openshift-tests

How reproducible:

nondeterministic, wild guess is ~30% of upgrade jobs

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Inspect the E2E test log of an upgrade jobs and compare the time of the update ("Completed upgrade") with the time of the last check ( "Skipping admin ack", "Gate .* not applicable to current version", "Admin Ack verified') done by the admin ack test

Actual results:

Jan 23 00:47:43.842: INFO: Admin Ack verified
Jan 23 00:57:43.836: INFO: Admin Ack verified
Jan 23 01:07:43.839: INFO: Admin Ack verified
Jan 23 01:17:33.474: INFO: Completed upgrade to registry.build01.ci.openshift.org/ci-op-z09ll8fw/release@sha256:322cf67dc00dd6fa4fdd25c3530e4e75800f6306bd86c4ad1418c92770d58ab8

No check done after the upgrade

Expected results:

Jan 23 00:57:37.894: INFO: Admin Ack verified
Jan 23 01:07:37.894: INFO: Admin Ack verified
Jan 23 01:16:43.618: INFO: Completed upgrade to registry.build01.ci.openshift.org/ci-op-z8h5x1c5/release@sha256:9c4c732a0b4c2ae887c73b35685e52146518e5d2b06726465d99e6a83ccfee8d
Jan 23 01:17:57.937: INFO: Admin Ack verified

One or more checks done after upgrade

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-533. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

customer is using Azure AD as openid provider and groups synchronization from the provider.

The scenario is the following:

1)

  • user A login.
    groups are created with the membership.
    User A is member of a group with admin rights and it's cluster-admin

2)

  • user B login:
    groups are updated with membership
    UserB is also member of the group with admin rights and it's cluster admin

3)

  • user A login:
    groups are identical as in the former step.
    user A has no administration rights.

The groups memberships are the same in step 2 and 3.
The cluster role bindings of the groups have never changed.

the only way to have user A again the admin rights is to delete the membership from the group and have user A login again.

I have not managed to reproduce this using RH SSO. Neither Azure AD.

But my configuration is not exactly the same yet.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4960. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
This is a follow up on OCPBUGSM-47202 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110570)

While OCPBUGSM-47202 fixes the issue specific for Set Pod Count, many other actions aren't fixed. When the user updates a Deployment with one of this options, and selects the action again, the old values are still shown.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable)
4.8-4.12 as well as master with the changes of OCPBUGSM-47202

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Import a deployment
  2. Select the deployment to open the topology sidebar
  3. Click on actions and one of the 4 options to update the deployment with a modal
    1. Edit labels
    2. Edit annotatations
    3. Edit update strategy
    4. Edit resource limits
  4. Click on the action again and check if the data in the modal reflects the changes from step 3

Actual results:
Old data (labels, annotations, etc.) was shown.

Expected results:
Latest data should be shown

Additional info:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-8286. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

mapi_machinehealthcheck_short_circuit is not properly reconciling the state, when a MachineHealthCheck is failing because of unhealthy Machines but then is removed.

When doing two MachineSet (called blue and green and only one has running Machines at a specific point in time) with MachineAutoscaler and MachineHealthCheck, the mapi_machinehealthcheck_short_circuit will continue to report 1 for MachineHealth that actually was removed because of a switch from blue to green.

$ oc get machineset | egrep 'blue|green'
housiocp4-wvqbx-worker-blue-us-east-2a    0         0                             2d17h
housiocp4-wvqbx-worker-green-us-east-2a   1         1         1       1           2d17h

$ oc get machineautoscaler
NAME                      REF KIND     REF NAME                                   MIN   MAX   AGE
worker-green-us-east-1a   MachineSet   housiocp4-wvqbx-worker-green-us-east-2a   1     4     2d17h

$ oc get machinehealthcheck
NAME                              MAXUNHEALTHY   EXPECTEDMACHINES   CURRENTHEALTHY
machine-api-termination-handler   100%           0                  0
worker-green-us-east-1a           40%            1                  1

      {
        "name": "machine-health-check-unterminated-short-circuit",
        "file": "/etc/prometheus/rules/prometheus-k8s-rulefiles-0/openshift-machine-api-machine-api-operator-prometheus-rules-ccb650d9-6fc4-422b-90bb-70452f4aff8f.yaml",
        "rules": [
          { 
            "state": "firing",
            "name": "MachineHealthCheckUnterminatedShortCircuit",
            "query": "mapi_machinehealthcheck_short_circuit == 1",
            "duration": 1800,
            "labels": {
              "severity": "warning"
            },
            "annotations": {
              "description": "The number of unhealthy machines has exceeded the `maxUnhealthy` limit for the check, you should check\nthe status of machines in the cluster.\n",
              "summary": "machine health check {{ $labels.name }} has been disabled by short circuit for more than 30 minutes"
            },
            "alerts": [
              { 
                "labels": {
                  "alertname": "MachineHealthCheckUnterminatedShortCircuit",
                  "container": "kube-rbac-proxy-mhc-mtrc",
                  "endpoint": "mhc-mtrc",
                  "exported_namespace": "openshift-machine-api",
                  "instance": "10.128.0.58:8444",
                  "job": "machine-api-controllers",
                  "name": "worker-blue-us-east-1a",
                  "namespace": "openshift-machine-api",
                  "pod": "machine-api-controllers-779dcb8769-8gcn6",
                  "service": "machine-api-controllers",
                  "severity": "warning"
                },
                "annotations": {
                  "description": "The number of unhealthy machines has exceeded the `maxUnhealthy` limit for the check, you should check\nthe status of machines in the cluster.\n",
                  "summary": "machine health check worker-blue-us-east-1a has been disabled by short circuit for more than 30 minutes"
                },
                "state": "firing",
                "activeAt": "2022-12-09T15:59:25.1287541Z",
                "value": "1e+00"
              }
            ],
            "health": "ok",
            "evaluationTime": 0.000648129,
            "lastEvaluation": "2022-12-12T09:35:55.140174009Z",
            "type": "alerting"
          }
        ],
        "interval": 30,
        "limit": 0,
        "evaluationTime": 0.000661589,
        "lastEvaluation": "2022-12-12T09:35:55.140165629Z"
      },

As we can see above, worker-blue-us-east-1a is no longer available and active but rather worker-green-us-east-1a. But worker-blue-us-east-1a was there before the switch to green has happen and was actuall reporting some unhealthy Machines. But since it's now gone, mapi_machinehealthcheck_short_circuit should properly reconcile as otherwise this is a false/positive alert.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OpenShift Container Platform 4.12.0-rc.3 (but is also seen on previous version)

How reproducible:

- Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Setup OpenShift Container Platform 4 on AWS for example
2. Create blue and green MachineSet with MachineAutoScaler and MachineHealthCheck
3. Have active Machines for blue only
4. Trigger unhealthy Machines in blue MachineSet
5. Switch to green MachineSet, by removing MachineHealthCheck, MachineAutoscaler and setting replicate of blue MachineSet to 0
6. Create green MachineHealthCheck, MachineAutoscaler and scale geen MachineSet to 1
7. Observe how mapi_machinehealthcheck_short_circuit continues to report unhealthy state for blue MachineHealthCheck which no longer exists.

Actual results:

mapi_machinehealthcheck_short_circuit reporting problematic MachineHealthCheck even though the faulty MachineHealthCheck does no longer exist.

Expected results:

mapi_machinehealthcheck_short_circuit to properly reconcile it's state and remove MachineHealthChecks that have been removed on OpenShift Container Platform level

Additional info:

It kind of looks like similar to the issue reported in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013528 respectively https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2047702 (although https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2047702 may not be super relevant)

Description of problem:

Whenever one runs ovnkube-trace from an in-cluster pod to a pod in the host network that is in different node, the following spurious error appears despite of the underlying ovn-trace being correct:

ovn-trace indicates failure from ingress-canary-7zhxs to router-default-6758fb465c-s66rv - output to "k8s-worker-0.example.redhat.com" not matched

This is caused because as per[1], if the destination pod is in host network, the outport is expected to be of the form "k8s-${NODE_NAME}", which is true only if either in local gateway or if the source pod is in the same node than the destination pod.

This is already fixed in the master branch[2], but we would need this to be backported to previous releases. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.4

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. ovnkube-trace from pod in the SDN to pod in host network
2.
3.

Actual results:

Wrong error

Expected results:

No wrong error

Additional info:

References:
[1] - https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/blob/release-4.11/go-controller/cmd/ovnkube-trace/ovnkube-trace.go#L771-L777
[2] - https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/blob/master/go-controller/cmd/ovnkube-trace/ovnkube-trace.go#L755-L769

Description of problem:

This issue exists to drive the backport process of https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/1313

According to the Kubernetes documentation, starting from Kubernetes 1.22, the service-account-issuer flag can be specified multiple times. The first value is then used to generate new tokens and other values are accepted. Using this field can prevent cluster disruptions and allows for smoother reconfiguration of this field.

see: https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/configure-service-account/#service-account-token-volume-projection

The status field will allow us to keep track of "used" service account issuers and also expire/prune them.

this is a replacement for: #1309

xref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AUTH-309

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

The storageclass "thin-csi" is created by vsphere-CSI-Driver-Operator, after deleting it manually, it should be re-created immediately. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.4

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Check storageclass in running cluster, thin-csi is present:
$ oc get sc 
NAME             PROVISIONER                    RECLAIMPOLICY   VOLUMEBINDINGMODE      ALLOWVOLUMEEXPANSION   AGE
thin (default)   kubernetes.io/vsphere-volume   Delete          Immediate              false                  41m
thin-csi         csi.vsphere.vmware.com         Delete          WaitForFirstConsumer   true                   38m
2. Delete thin-csi storageclass:
$ oc delete sc thin-csi
storageclass.storage.k8s.io "thin-csi" deleted
3. Check storageclass again, thin-csi is not present:
$ oc get sc
NAME             PROVISIONER                    RECLAIMPOLICY   VOLUMEBINDINGMODE   ALLOWVOLUMEEXPANSION   AGE
thin (default)   kubernetes.io/vsphere-volume   Delete          Immediate           false                  50m
4. Check vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator log:
......
I0909 03:47:42.172866       1 named_certificates.go:53] "Loaded SNI cert" index=0 certName="self-signed loopback" certDetail="\"apiserver-loopback-client@1662695014\" [serving] validServingFor=[apiserver-loopback-client] issuer=\"apiserver-loopback-client-ca@1662695014\" (2022-09-09 02:43:34 +0000 UTC to 2023-09-09 02:43:34 +0000 UTC (now=2022-09-09 03:47:42.172853123 +0000 UTC))"I0909 03:49:38.294962       
1 streamwatcher.go:111] Unexpected EOF during watch stream event decoding: unexpected EOFI0909 03:49:38.295468       
1 streamwatcher.go:111] Unexpected EOF during watch stream event decoding: unexpected EOFI0909 03:49:38.295765       
1 streamwatcher.go:111] Unexpected EOF during watch stream event decoding: unexpected EOF

5. Only first time creating in vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator log:
$ oc -n openshift-cluster-csi-drivers logs vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator-7cc6d44b5c-c8czw | grep -i "storageclass"I0909 03:46:31.865926   1 event.go:285] Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"Deployment", Namespace:"openshift-cluster-csi-drivers", Name:"vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator", UID:"9e0c3e2d-d403-40a1-bf69-191d7aec202b", APIVersion:"apps/v1", ResourceVersion:"", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Normal' reason: 'StorageClassCreated' Created StorageClass.storage.k8s.io/thin-csi because it was missing 

Actual results:

The storageclass "thin-csi" could not be re-created after deleting

Expected results:

The storageclass "thin-csi" should be re-created after deleting

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11972. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-9956. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

PipelineRun default template name has been updated in the backend in Pipeline operator 1.10, So we need to update the name in the UI code as well.

 

https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/master/frontend/packages/pipelines-plugin/src/components/pac/const.ts#L9

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-14415. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-14315. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4501. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

IPV6 interface and IP is missing in all pods created in OCP 4.12 EC-2.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Every time

Steps to Reproduce:

We create network-attachment-definitions.k8s.cni.cncf.io in OCP cluster at namespace scope for our software pods to get IPV6 IPs. 

Actual results:

Pods do not receive IPv6 addresses

Expected results:

Pods receive IPv6 addresses

Additional info:

This has been working flawlessly till OCP 4.10. 21 however we are trying same code in OCP 4.12-ec2 and we notice all our pods are missing ipv6 address and we have to restart pods couple times for them to get ipv6 address.

This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2073220](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073220). The following is the description of the original bug:

Description of problem:

https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.10/security/audit-log-policy-config.html#about-audit-log-profiles_audit-log-policy-config

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.*

How reproducible: always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Set audit profile to WriteRequestBodies
2. Wait for api server rollout to complete
3. tail -f /var/log/kube-apiserver/audit.log | grep routes/status

Actual results:

Write events to routes/status are recorded at the RequestResponse level, which often includes keys and certificates.

Expected results:

Events involving routes should always be recorded at the Metadata level, per the documentation at https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.10/security/audit-log-policy-config.html#about-audit-log-profiles_audit-log-policy-config

Additional info:

Description of problem:

Looks like a regression was introduced and the Windows networking tests started to fail accross all 4.11 CI jobs for both Linux-to-Windows and Windows-to-Windows pods communication. 

https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1415 merged without passing Windows networking tests.

https://github.com/openshift/windows-machine-config-operator/pull/1359  shows networking tests failing accross all CI jobs.





Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

Always 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Trigger a job retest in any of the above mentioned PRs
 

Actual results:

Windows networking test fail

Expected results:

Windows networking test pass

Additional info:

Direct link to a release-4.11 aws-e2e-operator CI job showing the failed networking test

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5019. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4941. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem: This is a follow-up to OCPBUGS-3933.

The installer fails to destroy the cluster when the OpenStack object storage omits 'content-type' from responses, and a container is empty.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.8.z

How reproducible:

Likely not happening in customer environments where Swift is exposed directly. We're seeing the issue in our CI where we're using a non-RHOSP managed cloud.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1226. The following is the description of the original issue:

We added server groups for control plane and computes as part of OSASINFRA-2570, except for UPI that only creates server group for the control plane.

We need to update the UPI scripts to create server group for computes to be consistent with IPI and have the instruction at https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/machine_management/creating_machinesets/creating-machineset-osp.html work out of the box in case customers want to create MachineSets on their UPI clusters.

Related to OCPCLOUD-1135.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4499. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-860. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

In GCP, once an external IP address is assigned to master/infra node through GCP console, numbers of pending CSR from kubernetes.io/kubelet-serving is increasing, and the following error are reported:

I0902 10:48:29.254427       1 controller.go:121] Reconciling CSR: csr-q7bwd
I0902 10:48:29.365774       1 csr_check.go:157] csr-q7bwd: CSR does not appear to be client csr
I0902 10:48:29.371827       1 csr_check.go:545] retrieving serving cert from build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal (10.0.0.5:10250)
I0902 10:48:29.375052       1 csr_check.go:188] Found existing serving cert for build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal
I0902 10:48:29.375152       1 csr_check.go:192] Could not use current serving cert for renewal: CSR Subject Alternate Name values do not match current certificate
I0902 10:48:29.375166       1 csr_check.go:193] Current SAN Values: [build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal 10.0.0.5], CSR SAN Values: [build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal 10.0.0.5 35.211.234.95]
I0902 10:48:29.375175       1 csr_check.go:202] Falling back to machine-api authorization for build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal
E0902 10:48:29.375184       1 csr_check.go:420] csr-q7bwd: IP address '35.211.234.95' not in machine addresses: 10.0.0.5
I0902 10:48:29.375193       1 csr_check.go:205] Could not use Machine for serving cert authorization: IP address '35.211.234.95' not in machine addresses: 10.0.0.5
I0902 10:48:29.379457       1 csr_check.go:218] Falling back to serving cert renewal with Egress IP checks
I0902 10:48:29.382668       1 csr_check.go:221] Could not use current serving cert and egress IPs for renewal: CSR Subject Alternate Names includes unknown IP addresses
I0902 10:48:29.382702       1 controller.go:233] csr-q7bwd: CSR not authorized

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.2

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Assign external IPs to master/infra node in GCP
2. oc get csr | grep kubernetes.io/kubelet-serving

Actual results:

CSRs are not approved

Expected results:

CSRs are approved

Additional info:

This issue is only happen in GCP. Same OpenShift installations in AWS do not have this issue.

It looks like the CSR are created using external IP addresses once assigned.

Ref: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C03KEQZC1L2/p1662122007083059

Description of problem:

[4.11.z] Fix kubevirt-console tests

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10314. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-8741. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5889. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Customer running a cluster with following config:
4.10.23
AWS/IPI
OVNKubernetes

Observed that in namespace with networkpolicy rules enabled, and a policy for allow-from-same namespace, pods will have different behaviors when calling service IP's hosted in that same namespace.

Example:
Deployment1 with two pods (A/B) exists in namespace <EXAMPLE>
Deployment2 with 1 pod hosting a service and route exists in same namespace
Pod A will unexpectedly stop being able to call service IP of deployment2; Pod B will never lose access to calling service IP of deployment2.

Pod A remains able to call out through br-ex interface, tag the ROUTE address, and reach deployment2 pod via haproxy (this never breaks)

Pod A remains able to reach the local gateway on the node

Host node for Pod A is able to reach the service IP of deployment2 and remains able to do so, even while pod A is impacted.

Issue can be mitigated by applying a label or annotation to pod A, which immediately allows it to reach internal service IPs again within the namespace.

I suspect that the issue is to do with the networkpolicy rules failing to stay updated on the pod object, and the pod needs to be 'refreshed' --> label appendation/other update, to force the pod to 'remember' that it is allowed to call peers within the namespace.

Additional relevant data:
- pods affects throughout cluster; no specific project/service/deployment/application
- pods ride on different nodes all the time (no one node affected)
- pods with fail condition are on same node with other pods without issue
- multiple namespaces see this problem
- all namespaces are using similar networkpolicy isolation and allow-from-same-namespace ruleset (which matches our documentation on syntax).



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.23

How reproducible:

every time --> unclear what the trigger is that causes this; pods will be functional and several hours/days later, will stop being able to talk to peer services.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. deploy pod with at least two replicas in a namespace with allow-from same network policy
2. deploy a different service and route example httpd instance in same namespace
3. observe that one of the two pods may fail to reach service IP after some time
4. apply annotation to pod and it is immediately able to reach services again.

Actual results:

pods intermittently fail to reach internal service addresses, but are able to be interacted with otherwise, and can reach upstream/external addresses including routes on cluster. 

Expected results:

pods should not lose access to service network peers. 

Additional info:

see next comments for relevant uploads/sosreports and inspects.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6517. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When the cluster is configured with Proxy the swift client in the image registry operator is not using the proxy to authenticate with OpenStack, so it's unable to reach the OpenStack API. This issue became evident since recently the support was added to not fallback to cinder in case swift is available[1].

[1]https://github.com/openshift/cluster-image-registry-operator/pull/819

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy a cluster with proxy and restricted installation
2. 
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem: 

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-baremetal-installer.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.11

Additional info: This issue is needed for the bot-created PR to merge after the 4.11 GA.

This is a clone of OCPBUGS-853.

Description of problem:

Large OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.24 - Cluster is failing to update router-certs secret in openshift-config-managed namespace as the given secret is too big.

2022-09-01T06:24:15.157333294Z 2022-09-01T06:24:15.157Z ERROR operator.init.controller.certificate_publisher_controller controller/controller.go:266  Reconciler error  {"name": "foo-bar", "namespace": "openshift-ingress-operator", "error": "failed to ensure global secret: failed to update published router certificates secret: Secret \"router-certs\" is invalid: data: Too long: must have at most 1048576 bytes"}

The OpenShift Container Platform 4 - Cluster has 180 IngressController configured with endpointPublishingStrategy set to private.

Now the default certificate needs to be replaced but is not properly replicated to openshift-authentication namespace and potentially other location because of the problem mentioned (since the required secret can not be updated)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.24

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OpenShift Container Platform 4.10
2. Create 180 IngressController with specific certificates
3. Check openshift-ingress-operator logs to see how it fails to update/create the necessary secret in openshift-config-managed

Actual results:

2022-09-01T06:24:15.157333294Z 2022-09-01T06:24:15.157Z ERROR operator.init.controller.certificate_publisher_controller controller/controller.go:266  Reconciler error  {"name": "foo-bar", "namespace": "openshift-ingress-operator", "error": "failed to ensure global secret: failed to update published router certificates secret: Secret \"router-certs\" is invalid: data: Too long: must have at most 1048576 bytes"}

Expected results:

No matter how many IngressController is created, secret management taken care by Operators need to work, even if data exceed 1 MB size limitation. In that case an approach needs to exist to split data into multiple secrets or handle it otherwise.

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-858. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

In OCP 4.9, the package-server-manager was introduced to manage the packageserver CSV. However, when OCP 4.8 in upgraded to 4.9, the packageserver stays stuck in v0.17.0, which is the version in OCP 4.8, and v0.18.3 does not roll out, which is the version in OCP 4.9

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OCP 4.8

2. Upgrade to OCP 4.9 

$ oc get clusterversion 
NAME      VERSION                             AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.8.0-0.nightly-2022-08-31-160214   True        True          50m     Working towards 4.9.47: 619 of 738 done (83% complete)

$ oc get clusterversion 
NAME      VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.9.47    True        False         4m26s   Cluster version is 4.9.47
 

Actual results:

Check packageserver CSV. It's in v0.17.0 

$ oc get csv  NAME            DISPLAY          VERSION   REPLACES   PHASE packageserver   Package Server   0.17.0               Succeeded 

Expected results:

packageserver CSV is at 0.18.3 

Additional info:

packageserver CSV version in 4.8: https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/blob/release-4.8/manifests/0000_50_olm_15-packageserver.clusterserviceversion.yaml#L12

packageserver CSV version in 4.9: https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/blob/release-4.9/pkg/manifests/csv.yaml#L8

Description of problem:

 

When creating a ProjectHelmChartRepository (with or without the form) and setting a display name (as `spec.name`), this value is not used in the developer catalog / Helm Charts catalog filter sidebar.

It shows (and watches) the display names of `HelmChartRepository` resources.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Switch to Developer Perspective
2. Navigate to Add > "Helm Chart repositories"
3. Enter "ibm-charts" as "Chart repository name"
4. Enter URL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/IBM/charts/master/repo/community/index.yaml as URL)
5. Press on create
6. Open the YAML editor and change the `spec.name` attribute to "IBM Charts"
7. Save the change
8. Navigate to Add > "Helm Chart" 

Actual results:

The filter navigation on the left side shows "Chart Repositories" "Ibm Chart". A camel case version of the resource name.

Expected results:

It should show the "spec.name" "IBM Charts" if defined and fallback to the current implementation if the optional spec.name is not defined.

Additional info:

There is a bug discussing that the display name could not be entered directly, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106366. This bug here is only about the catalog output.

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-753. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

The default dns-default pod is missing the "target.workload.openshift.io/management:" annotation. 

As a result when the workload partitioning feature is enabled on SNO, this pod resources will not get mutated and pinned to the reserved cpuset.

This is a regresion from 4.10. Pod spec from 4.10.17

Annotations:
...
   resources.workload.openshift.io/dns: {"cpushares": 51}
   resources.workload.openshift.io/kube-rbac-proxy: {"cpushares": 10}
   target.workload.openshift.io/management {"effect":"PreferredDuringScheduling"}

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.0

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install a SNO and check the annotation
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

 

We're seeing a slight uptick in how long upgrades are taking[1][2]. We are not 100% sure of the cause, but it looks like it started with 4.11 rc.7. There's no obvious culprits in the diff[3].

Looking at some of the jobs, we are seeing the gaps between kube-scheduler being updated and then machine-api appear to take longer. Example job run[4] showing 10+ minutes waiting for it.

TRT had a debugging session, and we have two suggestions:

  • Adding logging around when CVO sees an operator version changed
  • Instead of a fixed polling interval at 5 minutes (which is what we think CVO is doing), would it be possible to trigger on the CO to know when to look again? We think there could be some substantial savings on upgrade time by doing this.

[1] https://search.ci.openshift.org/graph/metrics?metric=job%3Aduration%3Atotal%3Aseconds&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-sdn-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-azure-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-sdn-upgrade
[2] https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.12/analysis?test=Cluster%20upgrade.%5Bsig-cluster-lifecycle%5D%20cluster%20upgrade%20should%20complete%20in%2075.00%20minutes
[3] https://amd64.ocp.releases.ci.openshift.org/releasestream/4-stable/release/4.11.0-rc.7
[4] https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-azure-sdn-upgrade/1556865989923049472

Description of problem:

This is a clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074299 for backporting purposes.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

For some reason, the LSP of a pod is not properly added to the port group where the ACL of a NetworkPolicy is applied. This results on the networkpolicy not being applied to the pod and communication not possible.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10

How reproducible:

Always with a concrete pod at customer environment.

Steps to Reproduce:

(not known exactly yet)

Actual results:

LSP not in port group. ACL not applied. Netpol not in effect.

Expected results:

LSP in port group. ACL applied. Netpol in effect.

Additional info:

Details in private comments, as they involve sensitive data.

Deleting the pod does nothing, but it is possible that this has something to do with the pod being recreated with the same name (although the LSPs UUIDs are different in each incarnation).

When a thin provisioned COW format disk is created on OCP on RHV via CSI driver (a PVC -
https://github.com/openshift/ovirt-csi-driver/blob/master/deploy/example/storage-claim.yaml

  • with for example requested storage 100 GB), the go-ovirt-client behaviour makes it so that the created disk has virtual size 100 GB and it's actual size is 110 GB.

But this is thin provisioned disk, so the initial size of the disk should be default of the engine and then grow as needed, it shouldn't be this big.

This causes all the disks created this way to be functionally preallocated (since it eats all that space), which is a real waste of space.

How reproducible: 100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a storage claim (PVC) in Openshift (
https://github.com/openshift/ovirt-csi-driver/blob/master/deploy/example/storage-claim.yaml
) using the default storage class (or any other storage class with thinProvisioning: "true") and with requested storage i.e. 100Gi

$ oc create -f storage-claim.yaml

2. In the RHV web console navigate to Storage -> Disks and check Virtual size and Actual size of the created disk (PVC)

Actual results:
Disk from our example with requested storage 100GB reports virtual size 100GB and actual size 110 GB.

Expected results:
Thin provisioned disks should start with small initial size and then grow as needed, so its actual size should be considerably smaller (the default initial size set by the engine should be 2.5 GB if I'm not mistaken).

Note: The extra 10GB in the actual size are caused by overhead for the qcow2 disk format, which is 10%, and this was tracked here as a separate issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097139

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6018. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a public clone of OCPBUGS-3821

The MCO can sometimes render a rendered-config in the middle of an upgrade with old MCs, e.g.:

  1. the containerruntimeconfigcontroller creates a new containerruntimeconfig due to the update
  2. the template controller finishes re-creating the base configs
  3. the kubeletconfig errors long enough and doesn't finish until after 2

This will cause the render controller to create a new rendered MC that uses the OLD kubeletconfig-MC, which at best is a double reboot for 1 node, and at worst block the update and break maxUnavailable nodes per pool.

This is a clone of OCPBUGSM-47085
Version:

$ openshift-install version
4.11.0-rc2

Platform:

Nutanix

On `openshift-installer create manifests` stage a connection to Prism is made (see https://github.com/openshift/installer/blob/master/pkg/asset/installconfig/nutanix/validation.go#L15-L36=)

This make generating manifests separately impossible, which breaks Assisted Installer flow. Instead of storing sensitive user information, Assisted Installer sets fake details in install-config.yaml and asks user to update these after installation has completed.

With validation happening on `openshift-install create manifests` phase installation process can't start with invalid credentials.

Please move this validation to ValidateForProvisioning, similar to vSphere

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6766. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2083087 (OCPBUGSM-44070) to backport this issue.

Description of problem:
"Delete dependent objects of this resource" is a bit of confusing for some users because when creating the Application in Dev console not only the deployment but also IS, route, svc, secret objects will be created as well. When deleting the Application (in fact it is deployment), there is an option called "Delete dependent objects of this resource" and some users might think this means the IS, route, svc and any other objects which are created alongside with the deployment will be deleted as well

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.8

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create Application in Dev console
2. Delete the deployment
3. Check "Delete dependent objects of this resource"

Actual results:
Only deployment will be deleted and IS, svc, route will not be deleted

Expected results:
We either change the description of this option, or we really delete IS, svc, route and any other objects created under this Application.

Additional info:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11998. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10678. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10655. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
The dev console shows a list of samples. The user can create a sample based on a git repository. But some of these samples doesn't include a git repository reference and could not be created.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Tested different frontend versions against a 4.11 cluster and all (oldest tested frontend was 4.8) show the sample without git repository.

But the result also depends on the installed samples operator and installed ImageStreams.

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Switch to the Developer perspective
  2. Navigate to Add > All Samples
  3. Search for Jboss
  4. Click on "JBoss EAP XP 4.0 with OpenJDK 11" (for example)

Actual results:
The git repository is not filled and the create button is disabled.

Expected results:
Samples without git repositories should not be displayed in the list.

Additional info:
The Git repository is saved as "sampleRepo" in the ImageStream tag section.

Description of problem:

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5879. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5505. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

The upgradeability check in CVO is throttled (essentially cached) for a nondeterministic period of time, same as the minimal sync period computed at runtime. The period can be up to 4 minutes, determined at CVO start time as 2minutes * (0..1 + 1). We agreed with Trevor that such throttling is unnecessarily aggressive (the check is not that expensive). It also causes CI flakes, because the matching test only has 3 minutes timeout. Additionally, the non-determinism and longer throttling results makes UX worse by actions done in the cluster may have their observable effect delayed.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

discovered in 4.10 -> 4.11 upgrade jobs

How reproducible:

The test seems to flake ~10% of 4.10->4.11 Azure jobs (sippy). There does not seem to be that much impact on non-Azure jobs though which is a bit weird.

Steps to Reproduce:

Inspect the CVO log and E2E logs from failing jobs with the provided [^check-cvo.py] helper:

$ ./check-cvo.py cvo.log && echo PASS || echo FAIL

Preferably, inspect CVO logs of clusters that just underwent an upgrade (upgrades makes the original problematic behavior more likely to surface)

Actual results:

$ ./check-cvo.py openshift-cluster-version_cluster-version-operator-5b6966c474-g4kwk_cluster-version-operator.log && echo PASS || echo FAIL
FAIL: Cache hit at 11:59:55.332339 0:03:13.665006 after check at 11:56:41.667333
FAIL: Cache hit at 12:06:22.663215 0:03:13.664964 after check at 12:03:08.998251
FAIL: Cache hit at 12:12:49.997119 0:03:13.665598 after check at 12:09:36.331521
FAIL: Cache hit at 12:19:17.328510 0:03:13.664906 after check at 12:16:03.663604
FAIL: Cache hit at 12:25:44.662290 0:03:13.666759 after check at 12:22:30.995531
Upgradeability checks:           5
Upgradeability check cache hits: 12
FAIL

Note that the bug is probabilistic, so not all unfixed clusters will exhibit the behavior. My guess of the incidence rate is about 30-40%.

Expected result

$ ./check-cvo.py openshift-cluster-version_cluster-version-operator-7b8f85d455-mk9fs_cluster-version-operator.log && echo PASS || echo FAIL
Upgradeability checks:           12
Upgradeability check cache hits: 11
PASS

The actual numbers are not relevant (unless the upgradeabilily check count is zero, which means the test is not conclusive, the script warns about that), lack of failure is.

Additional info:

$ curl --silent https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1607602927633960960/artifacts/e2e-azure-upgrade/gather-extra/artifacts/pods/openshift-cluster-version_cluster-version-operator-7b7d4b5bbd-zjqdt_cluster-version-operator.log | grep upgradeable.go
...
I1227 06:50:59.023190       1 upgradeable.go:122] Cluster current version=4.10.46
I1227 06:50:59.042735       1 upgradeable.go:42] Upgradeable conditions were recently checked, will try later.
I1227 06:51:14.024345       1 upgradeable.go:42] Upgradeable conditions were recently checked, will try later.
I1227 06:53:23.080768       1 upgradeable.go:42] Upgradeable conditions were recently checked, will try later.
I1227 06:56:59.366010       1 upgradeable.go:122] Cluster current version=4.11.0-0.ci-2022-12-26-193640

$ curl --silent https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1607602927633960960/artifacts/e2e-azure-upgrade/openshift-e2e-test/artifacts/e2e.log | grep 'Kubernetes 1.25 and therefore OpenShift 4.12'
Dec 27 06:51:15.319: INFO: Waiting for Upgradeable to be AdminAckRequired for "Kubernetes 1.25 and therefore OpenShift 4.12 remove several APIs which require admin consideration. Please see the knowledge article https://access.redhat.com/articles/6955381 for details and instructions." ...
Dec 27 06:54:15.413: FAIL: Error while waiting for Upgradeable to complain about AdminAckRequired with message "Kubernetes 1.25 and therefore OpenShift 4.12 remove several APIs which require admin consideration. Please see the knowledge article https://access.redhat.com/articles/6955381 for details and instructions.": timed out waiting for the condition
The test passes. Also, the "Upgradeable conditions were recently checked, will try later." messages in CVO logs should never occur after a deterministic, short amount of time (I propose 1 minute) after upgradeability was checked.

I tested the throttling period in https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pull/880. With the period of 15m, the test passrate was 4 of 9. Wiht the period of 1m, the test did not fail at all.

Some context in Slack thread

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4238. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3883. The following is the description of the original issue:

While doing a PerfScale test of we noticed that the ovnkube pods are not being spread out evenly among the available workers. Instead they are all stacking on a few until they fill up the available allocatable ebs volumes (25 in the case of m5 instances that we see here).

An example from partway through our 80 hosted cluster test when there were ~30 hosted clusters created/in progress

There are 24 workers available:

```

$ for i in `oc get nodes l node-role.kubernetes.io/worker=,node-role.kubernetes.io/infra!=,node-role.kubernetes.io/workload!= | egrep -v "NAME" | awk '{ print $1 }'`;    do  echo $i `oc describe node $i | grep -v openshift | grep ovnkube -c`; done
ip-10-0-129-227.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-136-22.us-west-2.compute.internal 25
ip-10-0-136-29.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-147-248.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-150-147.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-154-207.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-156-0.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-157-1.us-west-2.compute.internal 4
ip-10-0-160-253.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-161-30.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-164-98.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-168-245.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-170-103.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-188-169.us-west-2.compute.internal 25
ip-10-0-188-194.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-191-51.us-west-2.compute.internal 5
ip-10-0-192-10.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-193-200.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-193-27.us-west-2.compute.internal 7
ip-10-0-199-1.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-203-161.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-204-40.us-west-2.compute.internal 23
ip-10-0-220-164.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-222-59.us-west-2.compute.internal 0

```

This is running quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release:4.11.11-x86_64 for the hosted clusters and the hypershift operator is quay.io/hypershift/hypershift-operator:4.11 on a 4.11.9 management cluster

This is a backport from https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-1044

 

Description of problem:

https://github.com/prometheus/node_exporter/issues/2299

The node exporter pod when ran on a bare metal worker using an AMD EPYC CPU crashes and fails to start up and crashes with the following error message.    State:       Waiting
      Reason:    CrashLoopBackOff
    Last State:  Terminated
      Reason:    Error
      Message:   05.145Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=tapestats
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.145Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=textfile
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.145Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=thermal_zone
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=time
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=timex
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=udp_queues
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=uname
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=vmstat
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=xfs
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=zfs
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:199 level=info msg="Listening on" address=127.0.0.1:9100
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=tls_config.go:195 level=info msg="TLS is disabled." http2=false
panic: "node_rapl_package-0-die-0_joules_total" is not a valid metric name

 Apparently this is a known issue (See Github link) and was fixed in a later upstream.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.0

How reproducible:

Every-time 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Provision a bare metal node using an AMD EPYC CPU
2. Node-exporter pods that try to start on the nodes will crash with error message

Actual results:

Node-exporter pods cannot run on the new nodes 

Expected results:

Node exporter pods should be able to start up and run like on any other node

Additional info:

As mentioned above this issue was tracked and fixed in a later upstream of node-exporter

https://github.com/prometheus/node_exporter/issues/2299

Would we be able to get the fixed version pulled for 4.11?

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-416. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
The pod fails to mount the PVC using IBM Cloud VPC block storage.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:
The steps can be followed here: from this link
https://cloud.ibm.com/docs/openshift?topic=openshift-vpc-block
.
The error occurs when the application pod tried to mount the VPC.

Steps to Reproduce:
Describe above.

Actual results:
Events:
Type Reason Age From Message
---- ------ ---- ---- -------
Normal Scheduled 26m default-scheduler Successfully assigned default/test to a100-huge-m25p7-worker-3-with-secondary-xdwvl
Normal SuccessfulAttachVolume 26m attachdetach-controller AttachVolume.Attach succeeded for volume "pvc-8721c341-739d-4607-bbcb-9dcf66ef6dba"
Warning FailedMount 26m (x2 over 26m) kubelet MountVolume.MountDevice failed for volume "pvc-8721c341-739d-4607-bbcb-9dcf66ef6dba" : rpc error: code = Internal desc = {RequestID: ffbb97b4-e4d0-4016-87a9-dc46f80c5478 , Code: FormatAndMountFailed, Description: Failed to format '/dev/disk/by-id/virtio-0777-6872e22d-5c00-4' and mount it at '/var/lib/kubelet/plugins/kubernetes.io/csi/pv/pvc-8721c341-739d-4607-bbcb-9dcf66ef6dba/globalmount', BackendError: format of disk "/dev/disk/by-id/virtio-0777-6872e22d-5c00-4" failed: type"ext4") target"/var/lib/kubelet/plugins/kubernetes.io/csi/pv/pvc-8721c341-739d-4607-bbcb-9dcf66ef6dba/globalmount") options"defaults") errcode:(exit status 1) output:(mke2fs 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
The file /dev/disk/by-id/virtio-0777-6872e22d-5c00-4 does not exist and no size was specified.
) , Action: Please check if there is any error in POD describe related with volume attach}
Warning FailedMount 22m kubelet Unable to attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[bs-pvc], unattached volumes=[kube-api-access-6bgvj bs-pvc]: timed out waiting for the condition
Warning FailedMount 4m11s (x9 over 24m) kubelet Unable to attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[bs-pvc], unattached volumes=[bs-pvc kube-api-access-6bgvj]: timed out waiting for the condition
Warning FailedMount 3m51s (x17 over 26m) kubelet MountVolume.MountDevice failed for volume "pvc-8721c341-739d-4607-bbcb-9dcf66ef6dba" : rpc error: code = Internal desc = {RequestID: 1a12a7c5-3bd0-41cf-b8a9-90dd3224c2fb , Code: FormatAndMountFailed, Description: Failed to format '/dev/disk/by-id/virtio-0777-6872e22d-5c00-4' and mount it at '/var/lib/kubelet/plugins/kubernetes.io/csi/pv/pvc-8721c341-739d-4607-bbcb-9dcf66ef6dba/globalmount', BackendError: format of disk "/dev/disk/by-id/virtio-0777-6872e22d-5c00-4" failed: type"ext4") target"/var/lib/kubelet/plugins/kubernetes.io/csi/pv/pvc-8721c341-739d-4607-bbcb-9dcf66ef6dba/globalmount") options"defaults") errcode:(exit status 1) output:(mke2fs 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)

Expected results:
The pod should successfully mount the PVC

Additional info:
Had a debugging session with Sameer Shaikh and Arashad Ahamad from the IBM VPC block storage team. The conclusion is that the udevadm utility is missing in the IPI image used by the IBM Cloud VPC block storage CSI.

  1. oc exec -it ibm-vpc-block-csi-controller-5fbb46bdc6-k7kpf -n openshift-cluster-csi-drivers -c iks-vpc-block-driver bash
    kubectl exec [POD] [COMMAND] is DEPRECATED and will be removed in a future version. Use kubectl exec [POD][COMMAND] instead.
    bash-4.4$ which udevadm
    which: no udevadm in (/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin)

Description of problem:

Dummy bug that is needed to track backport of https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/pull/2975/commits/816e30a1fbb5beb8b20fe3e96906285762dd8eb6 which is already merged in 4.12

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10514. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10221. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5469. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When changing channels it's possible that multiple new conditional update risks will need to be evaluated. For instance, a cluster running 4.10.34 in a 4.10 channel today only has to evaluate `OpenStackNodeCreationFails` but when the channel is changed to a 4.11 channel multiple new risks require evaluation and the evaluation of new risks is throttled at one every 10 minutes. This means if there are three new risks it may take up to 30 minutes after the channel has changed for the full set of conditional updates to be computed. This leads to a perception that no update paths are recommended because most will not wait 30 minutes, they expect immediate feedback.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.z, 4.11.z, 4.12, 4.13

How reproducible:

100% 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install 4.10.34
2. Switch from stable-4.10 to stable-4.11
3. 

Actual results:

Observe no recommended updates for 10-20 minutes because all available paths to 4.11 have a risk associated with them

Expected results:

Risks are computed in a timely manner for an interactive UX, lets say < 10s

Additional info:

This was intentional in the design, we didn't want risks to continuously re-evaluate or overwhelm the monitoring stack, however we didn't anticipate that we'd have long standing pile of risks and realize how confusing the user experience would be.

We intend to work around this in the deployed fleet by converting older risks from `type: promql` to `type: Always` avoiding the evaluation period but preserving the notification. While this may lead customers to believe they're exposed to a risk they may not be, as long as the set of outstanding risks to the latest version is limited to no more than one it's likely no one will notice. All 4.10 and 4.11 clusters currently have a clear path toward relatively recent 4.10.z or 4.11.z with no more than one risk to be evaluated.

Description of problem:

 

During ocp multinode spoke cluster creation agent provisioning is stuck on "configuring" because machineConfig service is crashing on the node.
After restarting the service still fails with 

Can't read link "/var/lib/containers/storage/overlay/l/V2OP2CCVMKSOHK2XICC546DUCG" because it does not exist. A storage corruption might have occurred, attempting to recreate the missing symlinks. It might be best wipe the storage to avoid further errors due to storage corruption. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Podman 4.0.2 + 

How reproducible:

sometimes

Steps to Reproduce:

1. deploy multinode spoke (ipxe + boot order )
2.
3.

Actual results:

4 agents in done state and 1 is in "configuring"

 

Expected results:

all agents are in "done" state

Additional info:

issue mentioned in https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/14003

 

Fix: https://github.com/containers/storage/issues/1136