Problem:

Certain Insights Advisor features differentiate between RHEL and OCP advisor

Goal:

Address top priority UI misalignments between RHEL and OCP advisor. Address UI features dropped from Insights ADvisor for OCP GA.

Scope:

Specific tasks and priority of them tracked in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CCXDEV-7432

Managing PVs at scale for a fleet creates difficulties where "one size does not fit all". The ability for SRE to deploy prometheus with PVs and have retention based an on a desired size would enable easier management of these volumes across the fleet. 

The prometheus-operator exposes retentionSize.

This is a feature request to enable this configuration option via CMO cluster-monitoring-config ConfigMap.

cc Simon Pasquier  

Problem Alignment

The Problem

Today, all configuration for setting individual, for example, routing configuration is done via a single configuration file that only admins have access to. If an environment uses multiple tenants and each tenant, for example, has different systems that they are using to notify teams in case of an issue, then someone needs to file a request w/ an admin to add the required settings.

That can be bothersome for individual teams, since requests like that usually disappear in the backlog of an administrator. At the same time, administrators might get tons of requests that they have to look at and prioritize, which takes them away from more crucial work.

We would like to introduce a more self service approach whereas individual teams can create their own configuration for their needs w/o the administrators involvement.

Last but not least, since Monitoring is deployed as a Core service of OpenShift there are multiple restrictions that the SRE team has to apply to all OSD and ROSA clusters. One restriction is the ability for customers to use the central Alertmanager that is owned and managed by the SRE team. They can't give access to the central managed secret due to security concerns so that users can add their own routing information.

High-Level Approach

Provide a new API (based on the Operator CRD approach) as part of the Prometheus Operator that allows creating a subset of the Alertmanager configuration without touching the central Alertmanager configuration file.

Please note that we do not plan to support additional individual webhooks with this work. Customers will need to deploy their own version of the third party webhooks.

Goal & Success

• Allow users to deploy individual configurations that allow setting up Alertmanager for their needs without an administrator.

Solution Alignment

Key Capabilities

• As an OpenShift administrator, I want to control who can CRUD individual configuration so that I can make sure that any unknown third person can touch the central Alertmanager instance shipped within OpenShift Monitoring.
• As a team owner, I want to deploy a routing configuration to push notifications for alerts to my system of choice.

Key Flows

Team A wants to send all their important notifications to a specific Slack channel.

• Administrator gives permission to Team A to allow creating a new configuration CR in their individual namespace.
• Team A creates a new configuration CR.
• Team A configures what alerts should go into their Slack channel.
• Open Questions & Key Decisions (optional)
• Do we want to improve anything inside the developer console to allow configuration?

Copy/paste from [_https://github.com/openshift-cs/managed-openshift/issues/60_]

Which service is this feature request for?
OpenShift Dedicated and Red Hat OpenShift Service on AWS

What are you trying to do?
Allow ROSA/OSD to integrate with AWS Managed Prometheus.

Describe the solution you'd like
Remote-write of metrics is supported in OpenShift but it does not work with AWS Managed Prometheus since AWS Managed Prometheus requires AWS SigV4 auth.

• Note that Prometheus supports AWS SigV4 since v2.26 and OpenShift 4.9 uses v2.29.

Describe alternatives you've considered
There is the workaround to use the "AWS SigV4 Proxy" but I'd think this is not properly supported by RH.
https://mobb.ninja/docs/rosa/cluster-metrics-to-aws-prometheus/

Additional context
The customer wants to use an open and portable solution to centralize metrics storage and analysis. If they also deploy to other clouds, they don't want to have to re-configure. Since most clouds offer a Prometheus service (or it's easy to self-manage Prometheus), app migration should be simplified.

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.

Feature Overview.

Early customer feedback is that they see SNO as a great solution covering smaller footprint deployment, but are wondering what is the evolution story OpenShift is going to provide where more capacity or high availability are needed in the future.

While migration tooling (moving workload/config to new cluster) could be a mid-term solution, customer desire is not to include extra hardware to be involved in this process.

 For Telecommunications Providers, at the Far Edge they intend to start small and then grow. Many of these operators will start with a SNO-based DU deployment as an initial investment, but as DUs evolve, different segments of the radio spectrum are added, various radio hardware is provisioned and features delivered to the Far Edge, the Telecommunication Providers desire the ability for their Far Edge deployments to scale up from 1 node to 2 nodes to n nodes. On the opposite side of the spectrum from SNO is MMIMO where there is a robust cluster and workloads use HPA.

Goals

• Provide the capability to expand a single replica control plane topology to host more workloads capacity - add worker
• Provide the capability to expand a single replica control plane to be a highly available control plane
• To satisfy MMIMO Telecommunications providers will want the ability to scale a SNO to a multi-node cluster that can support HPA.
• Telecommunications providers do not want workload (DU specifically) downtime when migrating from SNO to a multi-node cluster.
• Telecommunications providers wish to be able to scale from one to two or more nodes to support a variety of radio hardware.
• Support CP scaling (CP HA) for 2 node cluster, 3 node cluster and n node cluster. As the number of nodes in the cluster increases so does the failure domain of the cluster. The cluster is now supporting more cell sectors and therefore has more of a need for HA and resiliency including the cluster CP.

Requirements

• TBD

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section:

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Feature Overview

• As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.

• As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

• Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

• Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
• Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
• Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
• Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
• In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
• For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
• Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
• The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
• The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

• As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
• As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
• As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
• As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
• As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

• As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
• As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

• This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

References

• Bootable Ephemeral Installer Image for Disconnected Cluster 0 Deployments

Feature Overview

The AWS-specific code added in OCPPLAN-6006 needs to become GA and with this we want to introduce a couple of Day2 improvements.
Currently the AWS tags are defined and applied at installation time only and saved in the infrastructure CRD's status field for further operator use, which in turn just add the tags during creation.

Saving in the status field means it's not included in Velero backups, which is a crucial feature for customers and Day2.
Thus the status.resourceTags field should be deprecated in favour of a newly created spec.resourceTags with the same content. The installer should only populate the spec, consumers of the infrastructure CRD must favour the spec over the status definition if both are supplied, otherwise the status should be honored and a warning shall be issued.

Being part of the spec, the behaviour should also tag existing resources that do not have the tags yet and once the tags in the infrastructure CRD are changed all the AWS resources should be updated accordingly.

On AWS this can be done without re-creating any resources (the behaviour is basically an upsert by tag key) and is possible without service interruption as it is a metadata operation.

Tag deletes continue to be out of scope, as the customer can still have custom tags applied to the resources that we do not want to delete.

Due to the ongoing intree/out of tree split on the cloud and CSI providers, this should not apply to clusters with intree providers (!= "external").

Once confident we have all components updated, we should introduce an end2end test that makes sure we never create resources that are untagged.

After that, we can remove the experimental flag and make this a GA feature.

Goals

• Inclusion in the cluster backups
• Flexibility of changing tags during cluster lifetime, without recreating the whole cluster

Requirements

• This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

List any affected packages or components.

• Installer
• Cluster Infrastructure
• Storage
• Node
• NetworkEdge
• Internal Registry
• CCO

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.
<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Feature --->
<--- Remove the descriptive text as appropriate --->

Feature Overview

• As RH OpenShift Product Owners, we want to enable new providers/platforms/service with varying levels of capabilities and integration with minimal reliance on OpenShift Engineering.
• As a new provider/platform partner, I want to enable my solution (hardware and/or software) with OpenShift with minimal effort.

Problem

• It is currently challenging for us to enable new platforms / providers without taking the heavy burden on doing the platform specific development ourselves.

Goals

• We want to enable the long-tail new platforms/providers to expand our reach into new markets and/or support new use cases.
• We want to remove strict dependencies we have on Engineering teams to review, support and test new providers.
• We want to lower the effort required for onboarding new platforms/providers.
• We want to enable new platform/providers to self-certify.
• We want to define tiered model for provider/platform integration that delineates ownership and responsibilities throughout new provider/platform development lifecycle and support model.
• We want to reduce time to onboard new provider/platform – ideally to a single release.
• We want to maintain consistent customer experience across all providers/platforms.

Requirements

• Step-by-step guide on how to add a new platform/provider for each tier
• Certification tool for partner to self-certify
• Certification tool results for (at least) each Y/minor release submitted by partner to Red Hat for acknowledgement
• DCI program to enable partners to run CI with OpenShift on their platform
• Well documented, accessible, and up-to-date test suites for providing the test coverage of the partner
• CI includes upgrade testing of OpenShift with partner's components
• Partner component upgrade failure should not block OpenShift upgrade
• Partner code is available in repositories in the openshift org on github with an open source license compatible with OpenShift

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section:

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

References

• [ Notes - OpenShift Everywhere - Onboarding new providers/platforms|https://www.google.com/url?q=[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M1zLG2-wmkeCWTS8omN5G8vsDKvDeZfmegsi7cCVh-U/edit?usp%3Dsharing&sa=D&source=calendar&ust=1641920246517943&usg=AOvVaw2ZIl_XuE7OsSr4wCmRjOp3]] 
• OKD Installer Architecture Brainstorming Working Group Meeting Minutes
• New-Platform Documentation Working Group Meeting Minutes

Goal

Increase integration of Shipwright, Tekton, Argo CD in OpenShift GitOps with OpenShift platform and related products such as ACM.

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

• Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
• Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

• Core Networking Stability
• Core Networking Performance and Scale
• Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
• Core Networking UX (Observability)
• Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

• Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
• SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
• Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

• CNV
• Service Mesh
• CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.

Relevant links:

• Documentation:
  • Edge Diagnostics Scratchpad, our team's internal diagnostic guide.
  • Troubleshooting OCP networking issues - The complete guide, the SDN team's diagnostic guide.
  • Linux Performance, Brendan Gregg's guide to analyzing Linux performance issues.
  • RFC: A proper feedback loop on Alerts.
  • OpenShift Router Reload Technical Overview on Access.
  • Performance Scaling HAProxy with OpenShift on Access.
  • How to collect worker metrics to troubleshoot CPU load, memory pressure and interrupt issues and networking on worker nodes in OCP 4 on Access.
  • OpenShift Performance and Scale Knowledge Base on Mojo, results from OpenShift scalability testing.
  • Scalability and performance, OCP 4.5 documentation about the router's currently known scalability limits.
  • Scaling OpenShift Container Platform HAProxy Router, OCP 3.11 documentation about the manual performance configuration that was possible in OCP 3.
  • Timing web requests with cURL and Chrome from the Cloudflare blog.
  • tcpdump advanced filters, some useful tcpdump commands.
  • OpenShift SDN - Networking, OCP 3.11 documentation on the SDN (useful background reading).
  • Ingress Operator and Controller Status Conditions, design document for improved status condition reporting.
  • Observability tips for HAProxy, a slide deck by Willy Tarreau.
  • Interesting Traces - Out of Order versus Retransmissions, analysis using tshark.
  • The PCP Book: A Complete Documentation of Performance Co-Pilot, by Yogesh Babar.
  • Debugging kernel networking bug, brief guide to using SystemTap on RHCOS.
  • Troubleshooting throughput issues from the OCP 4.5 documentation.
  • Troubleshooting OpenShift Clusters and Workloads.
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux Network Performance Tuning Guide (PDF).
  • openshift/enhancements#289 stability: point to point network check, a diagnostic built into the kube-apiserver operator.
• Diagnostic tools:
  • dropwatch to watch for packet drops.
  • ethtool to check NIC configuration.
  • iovisor/bcc: BCC - Tools for BPF-based Linux IO analysis, networking, monitoring, and more to trace and diagnose various issues in the networking stack.
  • r-curler to gather timing information about HTTP/HTTPS connections.
  • route-monitor, to monitor routes for reachability.
  • hping(3), a programmable packet generator.
  • OpenTracing / Jaeger in OpenShift.
  • node-problem-detector, a possible integration point for new diagnostics.
  • Using SystemTap by Brendan Gregg.
  • DTrace SystemTap cheatsheet (PDF).
• Visualization and more sophisticated diagnostic tools:
  • eldadru/ksniff, kubectl plugin for tcpdump & Wireshark.
  • ironcladlou/ditm, Dan's "Dan in the Middle" tool.
  • Skydive, network diagnostic and visualization tool.
  • ali, a "load testing tool capable of performing real-time analysis" with visualization.
• Testing tools:
  • stress-ng, a general stress-loading tool (CPU, filesystem, network, ...).
  • mb, the networking benchmarking tool written and used by Jiri Mencak from our Perf+Scale team.
• Case studies:
  • BZ1763206 is an example of diagnosing DNS latency/timeouts.
  • BZ1829779 Investigation details the diagnosis of route latency.
  • BZ1845545 is an example of diagnosing misconfigured DNS for an external LB.
  • Debugging network stalls on Kubernetes, from the GitHub Blog, about diagnosing Kubernetes performance issues related to ksoftirqd.

Feature Overview

• This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary

• Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

Goals

• This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature

• …

Requirements

• This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories

• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories

• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?

• Does this feature have doc impact?  

• New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact

• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.

• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?

• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?

• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?

• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.

• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Feature Overview

Customers are asking for improvements to the upgrade experience (both over-the-air and disconnected). This is a feature tracking epics required to get that work done.  

Goals

1. Have an option to do upgrades in more discrete steps under admin control. Specifically, these steps are: 
   • Control plane upgrade
   • Worker nodes upgrade
   • Workload enabling upgrade (i..e. Router, other components) or infra nodes
2. Better visibility into any errors during the upgrades and documentation of what they error means and how to recover. 
3. An user experience around an end-2-end back-up and restore after a failed upgrade 
4. OTA-810  - Better Documentation: 
   • Backup procedures before upgrades. 
   • More control over worker upgrades (with tagged pools between user Vs admin)
   • The kinds of pre-upgrade tests that are run, the errors that are flagged and what they mean and how to address them. 
   • Better explanation of each discrete step in upgrades, and what each CVO Operator is doing and potential errors, troubleshooting and mitigating actions.

References

• OpenShift Upgrades Customer Issues Discussion -6/22/2023
• Select Customer Experiences and Feedback on Upgrades

Feature Overview

Enable sharing ConfigMap and Secret across namespaces

Requirements

Questions to answer…

NA

Out of Scope

NA

Background, and strategic fit

Consumption of RHEL entitlements has been a challenge on OCP 4 since it moved to a cluster-based entitlement model compared to the node-based (RHEL subscription manager) entitlement mode. In order to provide a sufficiently similar experience to OCP 3, the entitlement certificates that are made available on the cluster (OCPBU-93) should be shared across namespaces in order to prevent the need for cluster admin to copy these entitlements in each namespace which leads to additional operational challenges for updating and refreshing them. 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:
 * What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
 * Does this feature have doc impact?
 * New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
 * If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
 * What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
 * How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
 * What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
 * Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
 * What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Summary (PM+lead)

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AUTH-2 revealed that, in prinicipal, Pod Security Admission is possible to integrate into OpenShift while retaining SCC functionality.

This epic is about the concrete steps to enable Pod Security Admission by default in OpenShift

Motivation (PM+lead)

Goals (lead)

• Enable Pod Security Admission in "restricted" policy level by default
• Migrate existing core workloads to comply to the "restricted" pod security policy level

Non-Goals (lead)

• Other OpenShift workloads must be migrated by the individual responsible teams.

Deliverables

Proposal (lead)

Enhancement - https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1010

User Stories (PM)

Dependencies (internal and external, lead)

Previous Work (lead)

Open questions (lead)

1. ...

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-authentication-operator/pull/570
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator/pull/120
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-samples-operator/pull/425

Epic Goal

HyperShift provisions OpenShift clusters with externally managed control-planes. It follows a slightly different process for provisioning clusters. For example, HyperShift uses cluster API as a backend and moves all the machine management bits to the management cluster.  

Why is this important?

showing machine management/cluster auto-scaling tabs in the console is likely to confuse users and cause unnecessary side effects. 

Definition of Done

• MachineConfig and MachineConfigPool should not be present, they should be either removed or hidden when the cluster is spawned using HyperShift. 
• Cluster Settings show say the control plane is externally managed and be read-only.
• Cluster Settings -> Configuration resources should be read-only, maybe hide the tab
• Some resources should go in an allowlist. Most will be hidden
• Review getting started steps

See Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k76JtRRHBdCCEjHPqKcYvbNVsuaGmRhWDLESWIm0mbo/edit#

Setup / Testing

It's based on the SERVER_FLAG controlPlaneTopology being set to External is really the driving factor here; this can be done in one of two ways:

• Locally via a Bridge Variable, export BRIDGE_CONTROL_PLANE_TOPOLOGY_MODE="External"
• Locally / OnCluster via modifying the window.SERVER_FLAGS.controlPlaneTopology to External in the dev tools

To test work related to cluster upgrade process, use a 4.10.3 cluster set on the candidate-4.10 upgrade channel using 4.11 frontend code.

Epic Goal

• Ensure that OCP Admin console can enable dark mode
• Mechanism for switching between light/dark mode, based on user preferences or User Settings in OCP
• Identify changes needed for OCP console's dynamic plugins
• Status as we work through the stories: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18ib0A9ZtSYo1e2aOtM2LtZcsNFs1aRCHXx6NAPsIAso/edit#

Why is this important?

• So the UX satisfies the current trands, where dark mode is becoming a standard for modern services.  

Acceptance Criteria

• OCP admin console must be rendered in a preferred mode based on `prefers-color-scheme` media query
• OCP admin console must be rendered in a preferred mode selected in the User Setting page
• Create an followup epic/story for and listing and tracking changes needed in OCP console's dynamic plugins

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. PatternFly - Dark mode PF variables

Previous Work (Optional):

1. Mike Coker has worked on a POC from the PF point of view on both the admin and dev console, and the screenshot results are listed below along with the repo branch. Also listed is a document covering some of the common issues found when putting together the admin console POC. https://github.com/mcoker/console/tree/dark-theme
   Background POC work completed for reference:

PatternFly Dark Theme Handbook: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mRYEfUoOjTsSt7hiqjbeplqhfo3_rVDO0QqMj2p67pw/edit

Admin Console -> Workloads & Pods

• Screenshots: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BoOpXpX96_uNUhVJiEqGUCZ-JMYh1A78fXJhk3H86K8/edit#slide=id.p
• Github branch: https://github.com/mcoker/console/tree/dark-theme
• Github PR for Dark Theme WIP by Vikram: https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/10947{}

Dev Console -> Gotcha pages: Observe Dashboard and Metrics, Add, Pipelines: builder, list, log, and run

• Screenshots: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/13jagAf_JEu82hd_KpEHRmj25xCEqwImWpNufzVopuUs/edit#slide=id.p
• Github branch: https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/10815
• Evaluation: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fBCPPb4Z1sqUDKgQkpueGe8VQZo4pBUA9PV4vnFCnDw/edit#gid=0

Open questions::

1. Who should be responsible for updating DynamicPlugins to be able to render in dark mode?

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

• Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

Goal

• Add the ability for users to select supported but not recommended updates.
• Refine workflow when both "upgradeable=false" and "supported-but-not-recommended" updates occur

Background
RFE: for 4.10, Cincinnati and the cluster-version operator are adding conditional updates (a.k.a. targeted edge blocking): https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OTA-267

High-level plans in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#update-client-support-for-the-enhanced-schema

Example of what the oc adm upgrade UX will be in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#cluster-administrator.

The oc implementation landed via https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/961.

Design

• Use case 01: "supported but not recommended" occurs to the latest version:
  • Add an info icon next to the version on update path with a pop-over to explain about why updating to this version is supported, but not recommended and a link to known risks
  • Identify the difference in "recommended" versions, "supported but not recommended" versions, and "blocked" versions (upgradeable=false) in the + more modal.
  • The latest version is pre-selected in the dropdown in the update modal with an inline alert to inform users about supported-but-not-recommended version with link to known risks. Users can choose to update to another recommended versions, update to a supported-but-not-recommended one, or wait.
  • The "recommended" and "supported but not recommended" updates are separated in the dropdown.
  • If a user selects a "recommended" update, the inline alert disappears.
• Use case 02: When both "upgradeable=false" and "supported but not recommended" occur:
  • Add an alert banner to explain why users shouldn’t update to the latest version and link to how to resolve on the cluster settings details page. Users have the options to resolve the issue, update to a patch version, or wait.
  • If users open the update modal without resolving the "upgradeable=false" issue, the next recommended version is pre-selected. An expandable link "View blocked versions (#)" is included under the dropdown to show "upgradeable=false" versions with resolve link.
  • If users resolve the "upgradeable=false" issue, the cluster settings page will change to use case 01

• • Question: Priority on changing the upgradeable=false alert banner in update modal and blocked versions in dropdown

See design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Nja4whdsI5dKmQNS_rXyN8IGtRXDJ8gXuU_eSxBLMIY/edit#

See marvel: https://marvelapp.com/prototype/h3ehaa4/screen/86077932

Epic Goal

• Add telemetry so that we know how image stream features are used.

Why is this important?

• We have a long standing epic to create image streams v2. We need to better understand how image streams are used today.

Scenarios

1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

1. …

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Epic Goal

• Make the image registry distributed across availability zones.

Why is this important?

• The registry should be highly available and zone failsafe.

Scenarios

1. As an administrator I want to rely on a default configuration that spreads image registry pods across topology zones so that I don't suffer from a long recovery time (>6 mins) in case of a complete zone failure if all pods are impacted.

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Pod's topologySpreadConstraints

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-image-registry-operator/pull/730
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Goal

Remove Jenkins from the OCP Payload.

Problem

• Jenkins images are "non-trival in size, impact experience around OCP payloads
• Security advisories cannot be handled once, but against all actively supported OCP releases, adding to response time for handling said advisories
• Some customers may now want to upgrade Jenkins as OCP upgrades (making this configurable is more ideal)

Why is this important

• This is an engineering motivated item to reduce costs so we have more cycles for strategic work
• Aside from the team itself, top level OCP architects want this to reduce the image size, improve general OCP upgrade experience
• Sends a mix message with respect to what is startegic CI/CI when Jenkins is baked into OCP, but Tekton/Pipelines is an add-on, day 2 install sort of thing

Dependencies (internal and external)

See epic linking - need alternative non payload image available to provide relatively seamless migration

Also, the EP for this is approved and merged at https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/builds/remove-jenkins-payload.md

Estimate (xs, s, m, l, xl, xxl):

Questions:

• in addition to needing the CPaaS Image available first, have we confirmed the "deprecate first, then remove" requirements?  Per grooming we've assigned Rob Gormley the task https://issues.redhat.com/browse/JKNS-274 for tracking this down.  I will be reaching out to Ben Parees (he is currently on vacation) to confirm from an OCP staff engineer / architect perspective if his approval of https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/841 is sufficient signoff from that end.

       PARTIAL ANSWER ^^:  confirmed with Ben Parees in https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C014MHHKUSF/p1646683621293839 that EP merging is currently sufficient OCP "technical leadership" approval.

Previous work

Customers

assuming none

Epic Goal

• Remove this UI from our stack that we cannot support.

Why is this important?

• Reduce support burden.
• Remove Bugzilla burden of addressing continuous CVEs found in this project.

Acceptance Criteria

• All Prometheus upstream UI links are removed
• Related documentation is updated
• Ports/routes etc configured to expose access to this UI are removed such that no configuration we provide enables access to this UI or its codepaths.
• There is no reason any CVEs found in this UI would ever require intervention by the Monitoring Team.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Make the Prometheus Targets information available in Console UI (https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1079)

Previous Work (Optional):

1. …

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Epic Goal

When users configure CMO to interact with systems outside of an OpenShift cluster, we want to provide an easy way to add the cluster ID to the data send.

Why is this important?

Technically this can be achieved today, by adding an identifying label to the remote_write configuration for a given cluster. The operator adding the remote_write integration needs to take care that the label is unique over the managed fleet of clusters. This however adds management complexity. Any given cluster already has a pseudo-unique datum, that can be used for this purpose.

• Starting in 4.9 we support the Prometheus remote_write feature to send metric data to a storage integration outside of the cluster similar to our own Telemetry service.
• In Telemetry we already use the cluster ID to distinguish the various clusters.
• For users of remote_write this could add an easy way to add such distinguishing information.

Scenarios

1. An organisation with multiple OpenShift clusters want to store their metric data centralized in a dedicated system and use remote_write in all their clusters to send this data. When querying their centralized storage, metadata (here a label) is needed to separate the data of the various clusters.
2. Service providers who manage multiple clusters for multiple customers via a centralized storage system need distinguishing metadata too. See https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSD-6573 for example

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• Document how to use this feature

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. none

Previous Work (Optional):

1. none

Open questions::

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Implementation proposal:

Expose a flag in the CMO configuration, that is false by default (keeps backward compatibility) and when set to true will add the _id label to a remote_write configuration. More specifically it will be added to the top of a remote_write relabel_config list via the replace action. This will add the label as expect, but additionally a user could alter this label in a later relabel config to suit any specific requirements (say rename the label or add additional information to the value).
The location of this flag is the remote_write Spec, so this can be set for individual remote_write configurations.

Epic Goal

• Offer the option to double the scrape intervals for CMO controlled ServiceMonitors in single node deployments
• Alternatively automatically double the same scrape intervals if CMO detects an SNO setup

The potential target ServiceMonitors are:

• kubelet
• kube-state-metrics
• node-exporter
• etcd
• openshift-state-metrics

Why is this important?

• Reduce CPU usage in SNO setups
• Specifically doubling the scrape interval is important because:

1. we are confident that this will have the least chance to interfere with existing rules. We typically have rate queries over the last 2 minutes (no shorter time window). With 30 second scrape intervals (the current default) this gives us 4 samples in any 2 minute window. rate needs at least 2 samples to work, we want another 2 for failure tolerance. Doubling the scrape interval will still give us 2 samples in most 2 minute windows. If a scrape fails, a few rule evaluations might fail intermittently.
2. We expect a measureable reduction of CPU resources (see previous work)

Scenarios

1. RAN deployments (Telco Edge) are SNO deployments. In these setups a full CMO deployment is often not needed and the default setup consumes too many resources. OpenShift as a whole has only very limited CPU cycles available and too many cycles are spend on Monitoring

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• ...

Previous Work (Optional):

1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1569

Open questions:

1. Whether doubling some scrape intervals reduces CPU usage to fit into the assigned budget

Non goals

• Allow arbitrarily long scrape intervals. This will interfere with alert and recoring rules
• Implement a global override to scrape intervals.

Problem:

This epic is mainly focused on the 4.10 Release QE activities

Goal:

1. Identify the scenarios for automation
2. Segregate the test Scenarios into smoke, Regression and other user stories
a. Update the https://docs.jboss.org/display/ODC/Automation+Status+Report
3. Align with layered operator teams for updating scripts
3. Work closely with dev team for epic automation
4. Create the automation scripts using cypress
5. Implement CI for nightly builds
6. Execute scripts on sprint basis

Why is it important?

To the track the QE progress at one place in 4.10 Release Confluence page

Use cases:

1. <case>

Acceptance criteria:

1. <criteria>

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Goal:

This epic covers a number of customer requests(RFEs) as well as increases usability.

Why is it important?

Customer satisfaction as well as improved usability.

Acceptance Criteria

1. Allow user to re-arrange the resources which have ben added to nav by the user
2. Improved user experience (form based experience)
   1. Form based editing of Routes
   2. Form based creation and editing of Config Maps
   3. Form base creation of Deployments
3. Improved discovery
   1. Include Share my project on the Add page to increase discoverability
   2. NS Helm Chart Repo
      1. Add tile to Add page for discoverability
      2. Provide a form driven creation experience
      3. User should be able to switch back and forth from Form/YAML
      4. change the intro text to the below & have the link in the intro text bring up the full page form
         1. Browse for charts that help manage complex installations and upgrades. Cluster administrators can customize the content made available in the catalog. Alternatively, developers can try to configure their own custom Helm Chart repository.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

None

Exploration:

Miro board from Epic Exploration

Problem:

Currently we are only able to get limited telemetry from the Dev Sandbox, but not from any of our managed clusters or on prem clusters.

Goals:

1. Enable gathering segment telemetry whenever cluster telemetry is enabled on OSD clusters
2. Have our OSD clusters opt into telemetry by default
3. Work with PM & UX to identify additional metrics to capture in addition to what we have enabled currently on Sandbox.
4. Ability to get a single report from woopra across all of our Sandbox and OSD clusters.
5. Be able to generate a report including metrics of a single cluster or all clusters of a certain type ( sandbox, or OSD)

Why is it important?

In order to improve properly analyze usage and the user experience, we need to be able to gather as much data as possible.

Goal:
Enhance oc adm release new (and related verbs info, extract, mirror) with heterogeneous architecture support

Epic Goal

• Update image registry dependencies (Kubernetes and OpenShift) to the latest versions.

Why is this important?

• New versions usually bring improvements that are needed by the registry and help with getting updates for z-stream.

Scenarios

1. As an OpenShift engineer, I want my components to use the versions of dependencies, so that they get fixes for known issues and can be easily updated in z-stream.

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Kubernetes 1.24

Previous Work (Optional):

1. IR-210

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>

Epic Goal

• Provide a dedicated dashboard for NVIDIA GPU usage visualization in the OpenShift Console.

Why is this important?

• Customers that use GPUs in their clusters usually have the GPU workloads as the main purpose of their cluster. As such, it makes much more sense to have the details about the usage they are doing of GPGPU resources AND CPU/RAM rather than just CPU/RAM

Scenarios

1. As an admin of a cluster dedicated to data science, I want to quickly find out how much of my very costly resources are currently in use and if things are getting queued due to lack of resources

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. The NVIDIA GPU Operator must export to prometheus the relevant data

Open questions::

1. Will NVIDIA agree to these extra data exports in their GPU Operator?

I asked Zvonko Kaiser and he seemed open to it. I need to confirm with Shiva Merla

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

• Run OpenShift builds that do not execute as the "root" user on the host node.

Why is this important?

• OpenShift builds require an elevated set of capabilities to build a container image
• Builds currently run as root to maintain adequate performance
• Container workloads should run as non-root from the host's perspective. Containers running as root are a known security risk.
• Builds currently run as root and require a privileged container. See BUILD-225 for removing the privileged container requirement.

Scenarios

1. Run BuildConfigs in a multi-tenant environment
2. Run BuildConfigs in a heightened security environment/deployment

Acceptance Criteria

• Developers can opt into running builds in a cri-o user namespace by providing an environment variable with a specific value.
• When the correct environment variable is provided, builds run in a cri-o user namespace, and the build pod does not require the "privileged: true" security context.
• User namespace builds can pass basic test scenarios for the Docker and Source strategy build.
• Steps to run unprivileged builds are documented.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Buildah supports running inside a non-privileged container
2. CRI-O allows workloads to opt into running containers in user namespaces.

Previous Work (Optional):

1. BUILD-225 - remove privileged requirement for builds.

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Description of problem:

NodePort port not accessible

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.8.20

How reproducible:

$oc -n ui-nprd get services -o wide
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE SELECTOR
docker-registry ClusterIP 10.201.219.240 <none> 5000/TCP 24d app=registry
docker-registry-lb LoadBalancer 10.201.252.253 internal-xxxxxx.xx-xxxx-1.elb.amazonaws.com 5000:30779/TCP 3d22h app=registry
docker-registry-np NodePort 10.201.216.26 <none> 5000:32428/TCP 3d16h app=registry

$oc debug node/ip-xxx.ca-central-1.compute.internal
Starting pod/ip-xxx.ca-central-1computeinternal-debug ...
To use host binaries, run `chroot /host`
Pod IP: 10.81.23.96
If you don't see a command prompt, try pressing enter.
sh-4.2# chroot /host
sh-4.4# nc -vz 10.81.23.96 32428
Ncat: Version 7.70 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Connection timed out.

In a new-created namespaces the same deployment works:

[RHEL7:> oc project
Using project "test-c1" on server "https://api.xx.xx.xxxx.xx.xx:6443".
[RHEL7:- ~/tmp]> oc port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000
Forwarding from 127.0.0.1:5000 -> 5000

[1]+ Stopped oc4 port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> bg %1
[1]+ oc4 port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000 &
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> nc -v localhost 5000
Ncat: Version 7.50 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Connected to 127.0.0.1:5000.
Handling connection for 5000

[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> kill %1
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]>
[1]+ Terminated oc4 port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> oc get services
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE
docker-registry-np NodePort 10.201.224.174 <none> 5000:31793/TCP 68s

[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> oc get pods -o wide
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE IP NODE NOMINATED NODE READINESS GATES
registry-75b7c7fd94-rx29j 1/1 Running 0 7m5s 10.201.1.29 ip-xxx.ca-central-1.compute.internal <none> <none>
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> oc debug node/ip-xxx.ca-central-1.compute.internal
Starting pod/ip-xxxca-central-1computeinternal-debug ...
To use host binaries, run `chroot /host`
Pod IP: 10.81.23.87
If you don't see a command prompt, try pressing enter.
sh-4.2# chroot /host
sh-4.4# nc -v 10.81.23.87 31793
Ncat: Version 7.70 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Connected to 10.81.23.87:31793.

Actual results:

• Working on new created namespace
• Not working on already created namespace

Expected results:

• Suppose to work on all namespaces.

Additional info:

• This cluster get upgrade from 4.7.x to 4.8 and then they manually enable OVN.
• The issue was happening on all namespaces but after restarting the ovnkube-master-xxxx pods only the newly created namespaces work.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1478

Description of problem: Issue described in following issue: https://github.com/openshift/multus-admission-controller/issues/40

Fixed in: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1515

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): OCP 4.10

Official Red Hat tracker. Issue has been merged already.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1698

Description of problem:

We need to have admin-ack in 4.11 so that admins can check the deprecated APIs and approve when they move to 4.12.Refer https://access.redhat.com/articles/6955381 for  more information. As planned we want to add the admin-ack around 4.12 feature freeze. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install a cluster in 4.11. 
2. Run an application which uses the deprecated API. See https://access.redhat.com/articles/6955381 for more information.
3. Upgrade to 4.12

Actual results:

The upgrade happens without asking the admin to confirm that the worksloads do not use the deprecated APIs.

Expected results:

Upgrade should wait for the admin-ack.

Additional info:

We had admin-acks in the past too e.g. https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.9/updating/updating-cluster-prepare.html#update-preparing-migrate_updating-cluster-prepare

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pull/836

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1226. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
We added server groups for control plane and computes as part of OSASINFRA-2570, except for UPI that only creates server group for the control plane.

We need to update the UPI scripts to create server group for computes to be consistent with IPI and have the instruction at https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/machine_management/creating_machinesets/creating-machineset-osp.html work out of the box in case customers want to create MachineSets on their UPI clusters.

Related to OCPCLOUD-1135.

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6351

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12182

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2508. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Installer fails due to Neutron policy error when creating Openstack servers for OCP master nodes.

$ oc get machines -A
NAMESPACE               NAME                          PHASE          TYPE   REGION   ZONE   AGE
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-master-0         Running                               23h
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-master-1         Running                               23h
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-master-2         Running                               23h
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-g7nrw   Provisioning                          23h
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-lrkvb   Provisioning                          23h
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-vwrsk   Provisioning                          23h

$ oc -n openshift-machine-api logs machine-api-controllers-7454f5d65b-8fqx2 -c machine-controller
[...]
E1018 10:51:49.355143       1 controller.go:317] controller/machine_controller "msg"="Reconciler error" "error"="error creating Openstack instance: Failed to create port err: Request forbidden: [POST https://overcloud.redhat.local:13696/v2.0/ports], error message: {\"NeutronError\": {\"type\": \"PolicyNotAuthorized\", \"message\": \"(rule:create_port and (rule:create_port:allowed_address_pairs and (rule:create_port:allowed_address_pairs:ip_address and rule:create_port:allowed_address_pairs:ip_address))) is disallowed by policy\", \"detail\": \"\"}}" "name"="ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-lrkvb" "namespace"="openshift-machine-api"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-10-14-023020

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install 4.10 within provider networks (in primary or secondary interface)

Actual results:

Installation failure:
4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-10-14-023020: some cluster operators have not yet rolled out

Expected results:

Successful installation

Additional info:

Please find must-gather for installation on primary interface link here and for installation on secondary interface link here.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-openstack/pull/248

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3889. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3744. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Egress router POD creation on Openshift 4.11 is failing with below error.
~~~
Nov 15 21:51:29 pltocpwn03 hyperkube[3237]: E1115 21:51:29.467436    3237 pod_workers.go:951] "Error syncing pod, skipping" err="failed to \"CreatePodSandbox\" for \"stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw_stage-wfe-proxy(c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2)\" with CreatePodSandboxError: \"Failed to create sandbox for pod \\\"stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw_stage-wfe-proxy(c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2)\\\": rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw_stage-wfe-proxy_c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2_0(72bcf9e52b199061d6e651e84b0892efc142601b2442c2d00b92a1ba23208344): error adding pod stage-wfe-proxy_stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw to CNI network \\\"multus-cni-network\\\": plugin type=\\\"multus\\\" name=\\\"multus-cni-network\\\" failed (add): [stage-wfe-proxy/stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw/c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2:openshift-sdn]: error adding container to network \\\"openshift-sdn\\\": CNI request failed with status 400: 'could not open netns \\\"/var/run/netns/8c5ca402-3381-4935-baed-ea454161d669\\\": unknown FS magic on \\\"/var/run/netns/8c5ca402-3381-4935-baed-ea454161d669\\\": 1021994\\n'\"" pod="stage-wfe-proxy/stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw" podUID=c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2
~~~

I have checked SDN POD log from node where egress router POD is failing and I could see below error message.

~~~
2022-11-15T21:51:29.283002590Z W1115 21:51:29.282954  181720 pod.go:296] CNI_ADD stage-wfe-proxy/stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw failed: could not open netns "/var/run/netns/8c5ca402-3381-4935-baed-ea454161d669": unknown FS magic on "/var/run/netns/8c5ca402-3381-4935-baed-ea454161d669": 1021994
~~~

Crio is logging below event and looking at the log it seems the namespace has been created on node.

~~~
Nov 15 21:51:29 pltocpwn03 crio[3150]: time="2022-11-15 21:51:29.307184956Z" level=info msg="Got pod network &{Name:stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw Namespace:stage-wfe-proxy ID:72bcf9e52b199061d6e651e84b0892efc142601b2442c2d00b92a1ba23208344 UID:c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2 NetNS:/var/run/netns/8c5ca402-3381-4935-baed-ea454161d669 Networks:[] RuntimeConfig:map[multus-cni-network:{IP: MAC: PortMappings:[] Bandwidth:<nil> IpRanges:[]}] Aliases:map[]}"
~~~

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.12

How reproducible:

Not Sure

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Egress router POD is failing to create. Sample application could be created without any issue.

Expected results:

Egress router POD should get created

Additional info:

Egress router POD is created following below document and it does contain pod.network.openshift.io/assign-macvlan: "true" annotation.

https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/networking/openshift_sdn/deploying-egress-router-layer3-redirection.html#nw-egress-router-pod_deploying-egress-router-layer3-redirection

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1631

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1329. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

etcd and kube-apiserver pods get restarted due to failed liveness probes while deleting/re-creating pods on SNO

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.32

How reproducible:

Not always, after ~10 attempts

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy SNO with Telco DU profile applied
2. Create multiple pods with local storage volumes attached(attaching yaml manifest)
3. Force delete and re-create pods 10 times

Actual results:

etcd and kube-apiserver pods get restarted, making to cluster unavailable for a period of time

Expected results:

etcd and kube-apiserver do not get restarted

Additional info:

Attaching must-gather.

Please let me know if any additional info is required. Thank you!

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/943

Description of problem:
In a complete disconnected cluster, the dev catalog is taking too much time in loading

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. A complete disconnected cluster
2. In add page go to the All services page
3.

Actual results:
Taking too much time too load

Expected results:
Time taken should be reduced

Additional info:
Attached a gif for reference

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12070

Description of problem:

For some reason, the LSP of a pod is not properly added to the port group where the ACL of a NetworkPolicy is applied. This results on the networkpolicy not being applied to the pod and communication not possible.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10

How reproducible:

Always with a concrete pod at customer environment.

Steps to Reproduce:

(not known exactly yet)

Actual results:

LSP not in port group. ACL not applied. Netpol not in effect.

Expected results:

LSP in port group. ACL applied. Netpol in effect.

Additional info:

Details in private comments, as they involve sensitive data.

Deleting the pod does nothing, but it is possible that this has something to do with the pod being recreated with the same name (although the LSPs UUIDs are different in each incarnation).

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1447

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-268. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
The linux kernel was updated:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/20/1030
to include steal

accounting

This would greatly assist in troubleshooting vSphere performance issues
caused by over-provisioned ESXi hosts.

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6260
• https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-operator/pull/1081

Description of problem:

When queried dns hostname from certain pod on the certain node, responded from random coredns pod, not prefer local one. Is it expected result ?

# In OCP v4.8.13 case
// Ran dig command on the certain node which is running the following test-7cc4488d48-tqc4m pod.
sh-4.4# while : ; do echo -n "$(date '+%H:%M:%S') :"; dig google.com +short; sleep 1; done
:
07:16:33 :172.217.175.238
07:16:34 :172.217.175.238 <--- Refreshed the upstream result
07:16:36 :142.250.207.46
07:16:37 :142.250.207.46

// The dig results is matched with the running node one as you can see the above one.
$ oc rsh  test-7cc4488d48-tqc4m bash -c 'while : ; do echo -n "$(date '+%H:%M:%S') :"; dig google.com +short; sleep 1; done'
:
07:16:35 :172.217.175.238 
07:16:36 :172.217.175.238 <--- At the same time, the pod dig result is also refreshed.
07:16:37 :142.250.207.46
07:16:38 :142.250.207.46


But in v4.10 case, in contrast, the dns query result is various and responded randomly regardless local dns results on the node as follows.

# In OCP v4.10.23 case, pod's response from DNS services are not consistent.
$ oc rsh test-848fcf8ddb-zrcbx  bash -c 'while : ; do echo -n "$(date '+%H:%M:%S') :"; dig google.com +short; sleep 1; done'
07:23:00 :142.250.199.110
07:23:01 :142.250.207.46
07:23:02 :142.250.207.46
07:23:03 :142.250.199.110
07:23:04 :142.250.199.110
07:23:05 :172.217.161.78

# Even though the node which is running the pod keep responding the same IP...
sh-4.4# while : ; do echo -n "$(date '+%H:%M:%S') :"; dig google.com +short; sleep 1; done
07:23:00 :172.217.161.78
07:23:01 :172.217.161.78
07:23:02 :172.217.161.78
07:23:03 :172.217.161.78
07:23:04 :172.217.161.78
07:23:05 :172.217.161.78

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

v4.10.23 (ROSA)
SDN: OpenShiftSDN

How reproducible:

You can always reproduce this issue using "dig google.com" from both any pod and the node the pod running according to the above "Description" details.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Run any usual pod, and check which node the pod is running on.
2. Run dig google.com on the pod and the node.
3. Check the IP is consistent with the running node each other. 

Actual results:

The response IPs are not consistent and random IP is responded.

Expected results:

The response IP is kind of consistent, and aware of prefer local dns.

Additional info:

This issue affects EgressNetworkPolicy dnsName feature.

• https://github.com/openshift/sdn/pull/466
• https://github.com/openshift/sdn/pull/456

Description of problem:

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Enable UWM + dedicated UWM Alertmanager
2. Deploy an application + service monitor + alerting rule which fires always
3. Go to the OCP dev console and silence the alert.

Actual results:
Nothing happens

Expected results:
The alert notification is muted.

Additional info:
Copied from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100860

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator/pull/1781
• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12104
• https://github.com/openshift/console-operator/pull/685

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-753. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

The default dns-default pod is missing the "target.workload.openshift.io/management:" annotation. 

As a result when the workload partitioning feature is enabled on SNO, this pod resources will not get mutated and pinned to the reserved cpuset.

This is a regresion from 4.10. Pod spec from 4.10.17

Annotations:
...
   resources.workload.openshift.io/dns: {"cpushares": 51}
   resources.workload.openshift.io/kube-rbac-proxy: {"cpushares": 10}
   target.workload.openshift.io/management {"effect":"PreferredDuringScheduling"}

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.0

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install a SNO and check the annotation
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-dns-operator/pull/349

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-operator/pull/1123

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1616

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10622. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Unit test failing 

=== RUN   TestNewAppRunAll/app_generation_using_context_dir
    newapp_test.go:907: app generation using context dir: Error mismatch! Expected <nil>, got supplied context directory '2.0/test/rack-test-app' does not exist in 'https://github.com/openshift/sti-ruby'
    --- FAIL: TestNewAppRunAll/app_generation_using_context_dir (0.61s)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

100

Steps to Reproduce:

see for example https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_oc/1376/pull-ci-openshift-oc-master-images/1638172620648091648 

Actual results:

unit tests fail

Expected results:

TestNewAppRunAll unit test should pass

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/1380

• https://github.com/openshift/sdn/pull/522

Description of problem:

This issue exists to drive the backport process of https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/1313

According to the Kubernetes documentation, starting from Kubernetes 1.22, the service-account-issuer flag can be specified multiple times. The first value is then used to generate new tokens and other values are accepted. Using this field can prevent cluster disruptions and allows for smoother reconfiguration of this field.

see: https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/configure-service-account/#service-account-token-volume-projection

The status field will allow us to keep track of "used" service account issuers and also expire/prune them.

this is a replacement for: #1309

xref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AUTH-309

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator/pull/1394

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1417

1. Proposed title of this feature request
--> Alert generation when the etcd container memory consumption goes beyond 90%

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
--> When the etcd database starts growing rapidly due to some high number of objects like secrets, events, or configmap generation by application/workload, the memory and CPU consumption of APIserver and etcd container (control plane component) spikes up and eventually the control plane nodes goes to hung/unresponsive or crash due to out of memory errors as some of the critical processes/services running on master nodes get killed. Hence we request an alert/alarm when the ETCD container's memory consumption goes beyond 90% so that the cluster administrator can take some action before the cluster/nodes go unresponsive.

I see we already have a etcdExcessiveDatabaseGrowth Prometheus rule which helps when the surge in etcd writes leading to a 50% increase in database size over the past four hours on etcd instance however it does not consider the memory consumption:

$ oc get prometheusrules etcd-prometheus-rules -o yaml|grep -i etcdExcessiveDatabaseGrowth -A 9

• alert: etcdExcessiveDatabaseGrowth
  annotations:
  description: 'etcd cluster "{{ $labels.job }}": Observed surge in etcd writes
  leading to 50% increase in database size over the past four hours on etcd
  instance {{ $labels.instance }}, please check as it might be disruptive.'
  expr: |
  increase(((etcd_mvcc_db_total_size_in_bytes/etcd_server_quota_backend_bytes)*100)[240m:1m]) > 50
  for: 10m
  labels:
  severity: warning

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
--> Once the etcd memory consumption goes beyond 90-95% of total ram as it's system critical container, the OCP cluster goes unresponsive causing revenue loss to business and impacting the productivity of users of the openshift cluster. 

4. List any affected packages or components.
--> etcd

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3124

Description of problem:

The alertmanager pod is stuck on OCP 4.11 with OVN in container Creating State

From oc describe alertmanager pod:
...
Events:
  Type     Reason                  Age                  From     Message
  ----     ------                  ----                 ----     -------
  Warning  FailedCreatePodSandBox  16s (x459 over 17h)  kubelet  (combined from similar events): Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_alertmanager-managed-ocs-alertmanager-0_openshift-storage_3a55ed54-4eaa-4f65-8a10-e5d21fad1ebc_0(88575547dc0b210307b89dd2bb8e379ece0962b607ac2707a1c2cf630b1aaa78): error adding pod openshift-storage_alertmanager-managed-ocs-alertmanager-0 to CNI network "multus-cni-network": plugin type="multus" name="multus-cni-network" failed (add): [openshift-storage/alertmanager-managed-ocs-alertmanager-0/3a55ed54-4eaa-4f65-8a10-e5d21fad1ebc:ovn-kubernetes]: error adding container to network "ovn-kubernetes": CNI request failed with status 400: '[openshift-storage/alertmanager-managed-ocs-alertmanager-0 88575547dc0b210307b89dd2bb8e379ece0962b607ac2707a1c2cf630b1aaa78] [openshift

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.11 with OVN

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Terminate the node on which alertmanager pod is running
2. pod will get stuck in container Creating state
3.

Actual results:

AlertManager pod is stuck in container Creating state

Expected results:

Alertmanager pod is ready

Additional info:

The workaround would be to terminate the alertmanager pod

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1422

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7437. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5547. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
This is a follow-up on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2083087 and https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12390

When creating a Knative Service and delete it again with enabled option "Delete other resources created by console" (only available on 4.13+ with the PR above) the secret "$name-github-webhook-secret" is not deleted.

When the user tries to create the same Knative Service again this fails with an error:

An error occurred
secrets "nodeinfo-github-webhook-secret" already exists

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.13

(we might want to backport this together with https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12390 and OCPBUGS-5548)

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OpenShift Serverless operator (tested with 1.26.0)
2. Create a new project
3. Navigate to Add > Import from git and create an application
4. In the topology select the Knative Service > "Delete Service" (not Delete App)

Actual results:
Deleted resources:

1. Knative Service (tries it twice!) $name
2. ImageStream $name
3. BuildConfig $name
4. Secret $name-generic-webhook-secret

Expected results:
Should also remove this resource

1. Delete Knative Service should be called just once
2. Secret $name-github-webhook-secret

Additional info:
When delete the whole application all the resources are deleted correctly (and just once)!

1. Knative Service (just once!) $name
2. ImageStream $name
3. BuildConfig $name
4. Secret $name-generic-webhook-secret
5. Secret $name-github-webhook-secret

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12602

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-858. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

In OCP 4.9, the package-server-manager was introduced to manage the packageserver CSV. However, when OCP 4.8 in upgraded to 4.9, the packageserver stays stuck in v0.17.0, which is the version in OCP 4.8, and v0.18.3 does not roll out, which is the version in OCP 4.9

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OCP 4.8

2. Upgrade to OCP 4.9 

$ oc get clusterversion 
NAME      VERSION                             AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.8.0-0.nightly-2022-08-31-160214   True        True          50m     Working towards 4.9.47: 619 of 738 done (83% complete)

$ oc get clusterversion 
NAME      VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.9.47    True        False         4m26s   Cluster version is 4.9.47
 

Actual results:

Check packageserver CSV. It's in v0.17.0 

$ oc get csv  NAME            DISPLAY          VERSION   REPLACES   PHASE packageserver   Package Server   0.17.0               Succeeded 

Expected results:

packageserver CSV is at 0.18.3 

Additional info:

packageserver CSV version in 4.8: https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/blob/release-4.8/manifests/0000_50_olm_15-packageserver.clusterserviceversion.yaml#L12

packageserver CSV version in 4.9: https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/blob/release-4.9/pkg/manifests/csv.yaml#L8

• https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/pull/381

Description of problem:
Cannot scale up worker node have deploying OCP 4.11.1 cluster via UPI on Azure

5h2m Warning FailedCreate machine/pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4 InvalidConfiguration: failed to reconcile machine "pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4": failed to create vm pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4: failure sending request for machine pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4: cannot create vm: compute.VirtualMachinesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=404 - Original Error: Code="NotFound" Message="The Image '/subscriptions/e639e479-2737-4b3d-b338-f1928f6429a1/resourceGroups/mlpipe-2163-azpln-rg/providers/Microsoft.Compute/images/pokus-2knkh-gen2' cannot be found in 'northeurope' region."

Customer would like to have the installer create machineset from the inital installation, therefore Kubernetes manifest files that define the worker machines were not removed during the installation.

Highlights:
Can I please let help verifying if these are the correct steps to have the initial installation created and manage the worker machines?Is there an explanation on how changing the image to -gen2 in [concat(parameters('baseName'),'-gen2')] from the 02_storage.json template can resolve the problem?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Environment:
OCP 4.11.1 UPI install on Azure using ARM
VM size:
bootstrap: Standard_D4s_v3
master: Standard_D4s_v3

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Following the step described in the document: Installing a cluster on Azure using ARM templates .

In the install-config.yaml, worker replicas was set to 0

compute:
- architecture: amd64
  hyperthreading: Enabled
  name: worker
  platform: {}
  replicas: 3   
controlPlane:
  architecture: amd64
  hyperthreading: Enabled
  name: master
  platform: {}
  replicas: 3

After creating the manifests described in this step: Creating the Kubernetes manifest and Ignition config files only control plane machines manifests were removed, worker machines manifests remain untouchedAfter three masters and three worker nodes were created by ARM templates, additional worker were added using machine sets via command

oc scale --replicas=1 machineset cluster-g7rzv-worker-francecentral1 -n openshift-machine-api` 

Actual results:
No addition node visible from `oc get nodes` and the following error occur:

5h2m Warning FailedCreate machine/pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4 InvalidConfiguration: failed to reconcile machine "pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4": failed to create vm pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4: failure sending request for machine pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4: cannot create vm: compute.VirtualMachinesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=404 - Original Error: Code="NotFound" Message="The Image '/subscriptions/e639e479-2737-4b3d-b338-f1928f6429a1/resourceGroups/mlpipe-2163-azpln-rg/providers/Microsoft.Compute/images/pokus-2knkh-gen2' cannot be found in 'northeurope' region."

The customer found out that this can be resolved if changing the -image to -gen2 in [concat(parameters('baseName'),'-gen2')] from the 02_storage.json template

Expected results:
The installer should be able to create and manage machineset

Additional info:
SFDC case #03304526

Slack discussion, might due to MAO not able to support UPI in Azure Thread1, Thread2
 

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6681

Description of problem:

[OVN][OSP] After reboot egress node, egress IP cannot be applied anymore.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-11-07-181244

How reproducible:

Frequently happened in automation. But didn't reproduce it in manual.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Label one node as egress node

2.
Config one egressIP object
STEP: Check  one EgressIP assigned in the object.

Nov  8 15:28:23.591: INFO: egressIPStatus: [{"egressIP":"192.168.54.72","node":"huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q"}]

3.
Reboot the node, wait for the node ready.

Actual results:

EgressIP cannot be applied anymore. Waited more than 1 hour.
 oc get egressip
NAME             EGRESSIPS       ASSIGNED NODE   ASSIGNED EGRESSIPS
egressip-47031   192.168.54.72    

Expected results:

The egressIP should be applied correctly.

Additional info:

Some logs
E1108 07:29:41.849149       1 egressip.go:1635] No assignable nodes found for EgressIP: egressip-47031 and requested IPs: [192.168.54.72]
I1108 07:29:41.849288       1 event.go:285] Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"EgressIP", Namespace:"", Name:"egressip-47031", UID:"", APIVersion:"", ResourceVersion:"", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning' reason: 'NoMatchingNodeFound' no assignable nodes for EgressIP: egressip-47031, please tag at least one node with label: k8s.ovn.org/egress-assignable


W1108 07:33:37.401149       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:162] Could not connect to huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q (10.131.0.2:9107): context deadline exceeded
I1108 07:33:37.401348       1 master.go:1364] Adding or Updating Node "huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q"
I1108 07:33:37.437465       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q (10.131.0.2:9107)

After this log, seems like no logs related to "192.168.54.72" happened.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1445

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-212. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

oc --context build02 get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION       AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.12.0-ec.1   True        False         45h     Error while reconciling 4.12.0-ec.1: the cluster operator kube-controller-manager is degraded

oc --context build02 get co kube-controller-manager
NAME                      VERSION       AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
kube-controller-manager   4.12.0-ec.1   True        False         True       2y87d   GarbageCollectorDegraded: error fetching rules: Get "https://thanos-querier.openshift-monitoring.svc:9091/api/v1/rules": dial tcp 172.30.153.28:9091: connect: cannot assign requested address

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

build02 is a build farm cluster in CI production.
I can provide credentials to access the cluster if needed.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-controller-manager-operator/pull/654

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7800. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-266. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem: I am working with a customer who uses the web console.  From the Developer Perspective's Project Access tab, they cannot differentiate between users and groups and furthermore cannot add groups from this web console.  This has led to confusion whether existing resources were in fact users or groups, and furthermore they have added users when they intended to add groups instead.  What we really need is a third column in the Project Access tab that says whether a resource is a user or group.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): This is an issue in OCP 4.10 and 4.11, and I presume future versions as well

How reproducible: Every time.  My customer is running on ROSA, but I have determined this issue to be general to OpenShift.

Steps to Reproduce:

From the oc cli, I create a group and add a user to it.

$ oc adm groups new techlead
group.user.openshift.io/techlead created
$ oc adm groups add-users techlead admin
group.user.openshift.io/techlead added: "admin"
$ oc get groups
NAME                                     USERS
cluster-admins                           
dedicated-admins                         admin
techlead   admin
I create a new namespace so that I can assign a group project level access:

$ oc new-project my-namespace

$ oc adm policy add-role-to-group edit techlead -n my-namespace
I then went to the web console -> Developer perspective -> Project -> Project Access.  I verified the rolebinding named 'edit' is bound to a group named 'techlead'.

$ oc get rolebinding
NAME                                                              ROLE                                   AGE
admin                                                             ClusterRole/admin                      15m
admin-dedicated-admins                                            ClusterRole/admin                      15m
admin-system:serviceaccounts:dedicated-admin                      ClusterRole/admin                      15m
dedicated-admins-project-dedicated-admins                         ClusterRole/dedicated-admins-project   15m
dedicated-admins-project-system:serviceaccounts:dedicated-admin   ClusterRole/dedicated-admins-project   15m
edit                                                              ClusterRole/edit                       2m18s
system:deployers                                                  ClusterRole/system:deployer            15m
system:image-builders                                             ClusterRole/system:image-builder       15m
system:image-pullers                                              ClusterRole/system:image-puller        15m

$ oc get rolebinding edit -o yaml
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
  creationTimestamp: "2022-08-15T14:16:56Z"
  name: edit
  namespace: my-namespace
  resourceVersion: "108357"
  uid: 4abca27d-08e8-43a3-b9d3-d20d5c294bbe
roleRef:
  apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
  kind: ClusterRole
  name: edit
subjects:

• apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
    kind: Group
    name: techlead
  Now, from the same Project Access tab in the web console, I added the developer with role "View".  From this web console, it is unclear whether developer and techlead are users or groups.

Now back to the CLI, I view the newly created rolebinding named 'developer-view-c15b720facbc8deb', and find that the "View" role is assigned to a user named 'developer', rather than a group.

$ oc get rolebinding                                                                      
NAME                                                              ROLE                                   AGE
admin                                                             ClusterRole/admin                      17m
admin-dedicated-admins                                            ClusterRole/admin                      17m
admin-system:serviceaccounts:dedicated-admin                      ClusterRole/admin                      17m
dedicated-admins-project-dedicated-admins                         ClusterRole/dedicated-admins-project   17m
dedicated-admins-project-system:serviceaccounts:dedicated-admin   ClusterRole/dedicated-admins-project   17m
edit                                                              ClusterRole/edit                       4m25s
developer-view-c15b720facbc8deb     ClusterRole/view                       90s
system:deployers                                                  ClusterRole/system:deployer            17m
system:image-builders                                             ClusterRole/system:image-builder       17m
system:image-pullers                                              ClusterRole/system:image-puller        17m
[10:21:21] kechung:~ $ oc get rolebinding developer-view-c15b720facbc8deb -o yaml
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
  creationTimestamp: "2022-08-15T14:19:51Z"
  name: developer-view-c15b720facbc8deb
  namespace: my-namespace
  resourceVersion: "113298"
  uid: cc2d1b37-922b-4e9b-8e96-bf5e1fa77779
roleRef:
  apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
  kind: ClusterRole
  name: view
subjects:

• apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
    kind: User
    name: developer

So in conclusion, from the Project Access tab, we're unable to add groups and unable to differentiate between users and groups.  This is in essence our ask for this RFE.

Actual results:

Developer perspective -> Project -> Project Access tab shows a list of resources which can be users or groups, but does not differentiate between them.  Furthermore, when we add resources, they are only users and there is no way to add a group from this tab in the web console.

Expected results:

Should have the ability to add groups and differentiate between users and groups.  Ideally, we're looking at a third column for user or group.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12663

This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2089950](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089950). The following is the description of the original bug:
—
Description of problem: Some upgrades failed during scale testing with messages indicating the console operator is not available. In total 5 out of 2200 clusters failed with this pattern.

These clusters are all configured with the Console operator disabled in order to reduce overall OCP cpu use in the Telecom environment. The following CR is applied:
apiVersion: operator.openshift.io/v1
kind: Console
metadata:
annotations:
include.release.openshift.io/ibm-cloud-managed: "false"
include.release.openshift.io/self-managed-high-availability: "false"
include.release.openshift.io/single-node-developer: "false"
release.openshift.io/create-only: "true"
ran.openshift.io/ztp-deploy-wave: "10"
name: cluster
spec:
logLevel: Normal
managementState: Removed
operatorLogLevel: Normal

From one cluster (sno01175) the ClusterVersion conditions show:

1. oc get clusterversion version -o jsonpath=' {.status.conditions}

   ' | jq
   [
   

   { "lastTransitionTime": "2022-05-19T01:44:13Z", "message": "Done applying 4.9.26", "status": "True", "type": "Available" }

   ,
   

   { "lastTransitionTime": "2022-05-24T14:57:50Z", "message": "Cluster operator console is degraded", "reason": "ClusterOperatorDegraded", "status": "True", "type": "Failing" }

   ,
   

   { "lastTransitionTime": "2022-05-24T13:49:43Z", "message": "Unable to apply 4.10.13: wait has exceeded 40 minutes for these operators: console", "reason": "ClusterOperatorDegraded", "status": "True", "type": "Progressing" }

   ,
   

   { "lastTransitionTime": "2022-05-21T02:07:06Z", "status": "True", "type": "RetrievedUpdates" }

   ,
   

   { "lastTransitionTime": "2022-05-24T13:53:05Z", "message": "Payload loaded version=\"4.10.13\" image=\"quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release@sha256:4f516616baed3cf84585e753359f7ef2153ae139c2e80e0191902fbd073c4143\"", "reason": "PayloadLoaded", "status": "True", "type": "ReleaseAccepted" }

   ,

   { "lastTransitionTime": "2022-05-24T13:57:05Z", "message": "Cluster operator kube-apiserver should not be upgraded between minor versions: KubeletMinorVersionUpgradeable: Kubelet minor version (1.22.5+5c84e52) on node sno01175 will not be supported in the next OpenShift minor version upgrade.", "reason": "KubeletMinorVersion_KubeletMinorVersionUnsupportedNextUpgrade", "status": "False", "type": "Upgradeable" }

   ]

Another cluster (sno01959) has very similar conditions with slight variation in the Failing and Progressing messages:

,

,

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.9.26 upgrade to 4.10.13

How reproducible: 5 out of 2200

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Disable console with managementState: Removed
2. Starting OCP version 4.9.26
3. Initiate upgrade to 4.10.13 via ClusterVersion CR

Actual results: Cluster upgrade is stuck (no longer progressing) for 5+ hours

Expected results: Cluster upgrade completes

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/console-operator/pull/715

Description of problem:

During ocp multinode spoke cluster creation agent provisioning is stuck on "configuring" because machineConfig service is crashing on the node.
After restarting the service still fails with 

Can't read link "/var/lib/containers/storage/overlay/l/V2OP2CCVMKSOHK2XICC546DUCG" because it does not exist. A storage corruption might have occurred, attempting to recreate the missing symlinks. It might be best wipe the storage to avoid further errors due to storage corruption. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Podman 4.0.2 + 

How reproducible:

sometimes

Steps to Reproduce:

1. deploy multinode spoke (ipxe + boot order )
2.
3.

Actual results:

4 agents in done state and 1 is in "configuring"

Expected results:

all agents are in "done" state

Additional info:

issue mentioned in https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/14003

Fix: https://github.com/containers/storage/issues/1136

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3319

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6887. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3476. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

When we detect a refs/heads/branchname we should show the label as what we have now:

- Branch: branchname

And when we detect a refs/tags/tagname we should instead show the label as:

- Tag: tagname

I haven't implemented this in cli but there is an old issue for that here openshift-pipelines/pipelines-as-code#181

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.z

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a repository
2. Trigger the pipelineruns by push or pull request event on the github  

Actual results:

We do not show tag name even is tag is present instead of branch

Expected results:

We should show tag if tag is detected and branch if branch is detedcted.

Additional info:

https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12247#issuecomment-1306879310

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12793

Description of problem:

prometheus-k8s-0 ends in CrashLoopBackOff with evel=error err="opening storage failed: /prometheus/chunks_head/000002: invalid magic number 0" on SNO after hard reboot tests

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.6

How reproducible:

Not always, after ~10 attempts

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy SNO with Telco DU profile applied
2. Hard reboot node via out of band interface
3. oc -n openshift-monitoring get pods prometheus-k8s-0 

Actual results:

NAME               READY   STATUS             RESTARTS          AGE
prometheus-k8s-0   5/6     CrashLoopBackOff   125 (4m57s ago)   5h28m

Expected results:

Running

Additional info:

Attaching must-gather.

The pod recovers successfully after deleting/re-creating.


[kni@registry.kni-qe-0 ~]$ oc -n openshift-monitoring logs prometheus-k8s-0
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.919Z caller=main.go:552 level=info msg="Starting Prometheus Server" mode=server version="(version=2.36.2, branch=rhaos-4.11-rhel-8, revision=0d81ba04ce410df37ca2c0b1ec619e1bc02e19ef)"
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.919Z caller=main.go:557 level=info build_context="(go=go1.18.4, user=root@371541f17026, date=20220916-14:15:37)"
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.919Z caller=main.go:558 level=info host_details="(Linux 4.18.0-372.26.1.rt7.183.el8_6.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_RT Sat Aug 27 22:04:33 EDT 2022 x86_64 prometheus-k8s-0 (none))"
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.919Z caller=main.go:559 level=info fd_limits="(soft=1048576, hard=1048576)"
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.919Z caller=main.go:560 level=info vm_limits="(soft=unlimited, hard=unlimited)"
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.921Z caller=web.go:553 level=info component=web msg="Start listening for connections" address=127.0.0.1:9090
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.922Z caller=main.go:989 level=info msg="Starting TSDB ..."
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.924Z caller=tls_config.go:231 level=info component=web msg="TLS is disabled." http2=false
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:848 level=info msg="Stopping scrape discovery manager..."
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:862 level=info msg="Stopping notify discovery manager..."
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=manager.go:951 level=info component="rule manager" msg="Stopping rule manager..."
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=manager.go:961 level=info component="rule manager" msg="Rule manager stopped"
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:899 level=info msg="Stopping scrape manager..."
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:858 level=info msg="Notify discovery manager stopped"
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:891 level=info msg="Scrape manager stopped"
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=notifier.go:599 level=info component=notifier msg="Stopping notification manager..."
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:844 level=info msg="Scrape discovery manager stopped"
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=manager.go:937 level=info component="rule manager" msg="Starting rule manager..."
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:1120 level=info msg="Notifier manager stopped"
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:1129 level=error err="opening storage failed: /prometheus/chunks_head/000002: invalid magic number 0"

• https://github.com/openshift/prometheus/pull/143

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4504. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1557. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Seen in an instance created recently by a 4.12.0-ec.2 GCP provider:

  "scheduling": {
    "automaticRestart": false,
    "onHostMaintenance": "MIGRATE",
    "preemptible": false,
    "provisioningModel": "STANDARD"
  },

From GCP's docs, they may stop instances on hardware failures and other causes, and we'd need automaticRestart: true to auto-recover from that. Also from GCP docs, the default for automaticRestart is true. And on the Go provider side, we doc:

If omitted, the platform chooses a default, which is subject to change over time, currently that default is "Always".

But the implementing code does not actually float the setting. Seems like a regression here, which is part of 4.10:

$ git clone https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-provider-gcp.git
$ cd machine-api-provider-gcp
$ git log --oneline origin/release-4.10 | grep 'migrate to openshift/api'
44f0f958 migrate to openshift/api

But that's not where the 4.9 and earlier code is located:

$ git branch -a | grep origin/release
  remotes/origin/release-4.10
  remotes/origin/release-4.11
  remotes/origin/release-4.12
  remotes/origin/release-4.13

Hunting for 4.9 code:

$ oc adm release info --commits quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release:4.9.48-x86_64 | grep gcp
  gcp-machine-controllers                        https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-gcp                       c955c03b2d05e3b8eb0d39d5b4927128e6d1c6c6
  gcp-pd-csi-driver                              https://github.com/openshift/gcp-pd-csi-driver                              48d49f7f9ef96a7a42a789e3304ead53f266f475
  gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator                     https://github.com/openshift/gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator                     d8a891de5ae9cf552d7d012ebe61c2abd395386e

So looking there:

$ git clone https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-gcp.git
$ cd cluster-api-provider-gcp
$ git log --oneline | grep 'migrate to openshift/api'
...no hits...
$ git grep -i automaticRestart origin/release-4.9  | grep -v '"description"\|compute-gen.go'
origin/release-4.9:vendor/google.golang.org/api/compute/v1/compute-api.json:        "automaticRestart": {

Not actually clear to me how that code is structured. So 4.10 and later GCP machine-API providers are impacted, and I'm unclear on 4.9 and earlier.

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-provider-gcp/pull/30

Description of problem:

[4.11.z] Fix kubevirt-console tests

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12325

Backport clone of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGSM-24281

openshift-4 tracking bug for telemeter-container: see the bugs linked in the "Blocks" field of this bug for full details of the security issue(s).

This bug is never intended to be made public, please put any public notes in the blocked bugs.

Impact: Moderate
Public Date: 11-Jan-2021
PM Fix/Wontfix Decision By: 04-May-2021
Resolve Bug By: 11-Jan-2022

In case the dates above are already past, please evaluate this bug in your next prioritization review and make a decision then. Remember to explicitly set CLOSED:WONTFIX if you decide not to fix this bug.

Please see the Security Errata Policy for further details: https://docs.engineering.redhat.com/x/9RBqB

• https://github.com/openshift/telemeter/pull/421

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10496. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Customer is running machine learning (ML) tasks on OpenShift Container Platform, for which large models need to be embedded in the container image. When building a new container image with large container image layers (>=10GB) and pushing it to the internal image registry, this fails with the following error message:

error: build error: Failed to push image: writing blob: uploading layer to https://image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/v2/example/example-image/blobs/uploads/b305b374-af79-4dce-afe0-afe6893b0ada?_state=[..]: blob upload invalid

In the image registry Pod we can see the following error message:

time="2023-01-30T14:12:22.315726147Z" level=error msg="upload resumed at wrong offest: 10485760000 != 10738341637" [..]
time="2023-01-30T14:12:22.338264863Z" level=error msg="response completed with error" err.code="blob upload invalid" err.message="blob upload invalid" [..]

Backend storage is AWS S3. We suspect that this could be the following upstream bug: https://github.com/distribution/distribution/issues/1698

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Customer encountered the issue on OCP 4.11.20. We reproduced the issue on OCP 4.11.21:

$  oc version
Client Version: 4.12.0
Kustomize Version: v4.5.7
Server Version: 4.11.21
Kubernetes Version: v1.24.6+5658434

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OpenShift Container Platform cluster 4.11.21 on AWS
2. Confirm registry storage is on AWS S3
3. Create a new build including a 10GB file using the following command: `printf "FROM registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:37\nRUN dd if=/dev/urandom of=/bigfile bs=1M count=10240" | oc new-build -D -`
4. Wait for some time for the build to run

Actual results:

Pushing the new build fails with the following error message:

error: build error: Failed to push image: writing blob: uploading layer to https://image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/v2/example/example-image/blobs/uploads/b305b374-af79-4dce-afe0-afe6893b0ada?_state=[..]: blob upload invalid

Expected results:

Push of large container image layers succeeds

Additional info:

• Internal Slack conversation: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C013VBYBJQH/p1675088416372959
• Possible upstream issue: https://github.com/distribution/distribution/issues/1698

• https://github.com/openshift/image-registry/pull/367

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11972. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-9956. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

PipelineRun default template name has been updated in the backend in Pipeline operator 1.10, So we need to update the name in the UI code as well.

https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/master/frontend/packages/pipelines-plugin/src/components/pac/const.ts#L9

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12790

Clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106803 to backport the e2e fix to 4.11 and 4.10.

Description of problem: E2E: intermittent failure is seen on tests for devfile due to network call to devfile registry

Deploy git workload with devfile from topology page: A-04-TC01

https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_console/11726/pull-ci-openshift-console-master-e2e-gcp-console/1547046629775773696/artifacts/e2e-gcp-console/test/artifacts/gui_test_screenshots/cypress/screenshots/e2e/add-flow-ci.feature/Deploy%20git%20workload%20with%20devfile%20from%20topology%20page%20A-04-TC01%20--%20after%20each%20hook%20(failed).png

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_console/11768/pull-ci-openshift-console-master-e2e-gcp-console/1547061730478133248

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible: Intermittent

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run test for add-flow-ci.feature to test Deploy git workload with devfile from topology page: A-04-TC01

Actual results:

Expected results: Show always pass

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12020

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1417. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Egress IP is not being assigned to primary interface of node as per hostsubnet definition. The issue being observed at an Openshift cluster hosted on Disconnected AWS environment.  Following steps were performed at AWS end:

- Disconnected VPC was created and installation of Openshift was done as per documentation.
- Elastic IP could not be used as it is a disconnected environment. Customer identified a free IP from same subnet as the node and modified interface of the node to add a secondary IP.

It seems cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig annotation is need on the node to attach IP to primary interface but its missing. From SDN POD log on the same node I  could see its complaining about 'an incomplete annotation "cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig"'. Will share more details over comments.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Openshift 4.10.28

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a disconnected environment on AWS
2. find a free IP from subnet where a worker node is hosted and add that as secondary  IP to NIC of that node.
3. Configure hostsubnet and netnamespace on Openshift cluster

Actual results:

- Eress IP is not being attached to primary interface of node for which hostsubnet has been configured

Expected results:

- Egress IP should get configured without any issue.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/pull/84

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-675. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

A cluster hit a panic in etcd operator in bootstrap:
I0829 14:46:02.736582 1 controller_manager.go:54] StaticPodStateController controller terminated
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x0 pc=0x1e940ab]

goroutine 2701 [running]:
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli.checkSingleMemberHealth({0x29374c0, 0xc00217d920}, 0xc0021fb110)
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli/health.go:135 +0x34b
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli.getMemberHealth.func1()
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli/health.go:58 +0x7f
created by github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli.getMemberHealth
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli/health.go:54 +0x2ac
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Pulled up a 4.12 cluster and hit panic during bootstrap

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

panic as above

Expected results:

no panic

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/924

Description of problem:

Whenever one runs ovnkube-trace from an in-cluster pod to a pod in the host network that is in different node, the following spurious error appears despite of the underlying ovn-trace being correct:

ovn-trace indicates failure from ingress-canary-7zhxs to router-default-6758fb465c-s66rv - output to "k8s-worker-0.example.redhat.com" not matched

This is caused because as per[1], if the destination pod is in host network, the outport is expected to be of the form "k8s-${NODE_NAME}", which is true only if either in local gateway or if the source pod is in the same node than the destination pod.

This is already fixed in the master branch[2], but we would need this to be backported to previous releases. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.4

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. ovnkube-trace from pod in the SDN to pod in host network
2.
3.

Actual results:

Wrong error

Expected results:

No wrong error

Additional info:

References:
[1] - https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/blob/release-4.11/go-controller/cmd/ovnkube-trace/ovnkube-trace.go#L771-L777
[2] - https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/blob/master/go-controller/cmd/ovnkube-trace/ovnkube-trace.go#L755-L769

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1436

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1282

We are in the process of moving our bug tracking to JIRA. We should update the report bug link in the help menu to use JIRA instead of Bugzilla for new bugs. Opening as a medium severity bug since this only impacts prerelease OpenShift versions. For release versions, we have users open customer cases.

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11965

• https://github.com/openshift/image-registry/pull/343

Description of problem:

AWS tagging - when applying user defined tags you cannot add more than 10

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6303

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2438. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

On the alert details page and alerting rule details page, clicking on a field that has a popover help throws an uncaught JavaScript error.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Go to Observe > Alerting pages
2. Click on an alert (or go to the rules tab then click on a rule)
3. Click on one of the underlined fields (those that have a popover help)

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12173

Description of problem:

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/pull/71

This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2034883](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034883). The following is the description of the original bug:
—
Description of problem: