Problem:

Certain Insights Advisor features differentiate between RHEL and OCP advisor

Goal:

Address top priority UI misalignments between RHEL and OCP advisor. Address UI features dropped from Insights ADvisor for OCP GA.

Scope:

Specific tasks and priority of them tracked in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CCXDEV-7432

Managing PVs at scale for a fleet creates difficulties where "one size does not fit all". The ability for SRE to deploy prometheus with PVs and have retention based an on a desired size would enable easier management of these volumes across the fleet. 

The prometheus-operator exposes retentionSize.

This is a feature request to enable this configuration option via CMO cluster-monitoring-config ConfigMap.

cc Simon Pasquier  

Problem Alignment

The Problem

Today, all configuration for setting individual, for example, routing configuration is done via a single configuration file that only admins have access to. If an environment uses multiple tenants and each tenant, for example, has different systems that they are using to notify teams in case of an issue, then someone needs to file a request w/ an admin to add the required settings.

That can be bothersome for individual teams, since requests like that usually disappear in the backlog of an administrator. At the same time, administrators might get tons of requests that they have to look at and prioritize, which takes them away from more crucial work.

We would like to introduce a more self service approach whereas individual teams can create their own configuration for their needs w/o the administrators involvement.

Last but not least, since Monitoring is deployed as a Core service of OpenShift there are multiple restrictions that the SRE team has to apply to all OSD and ROSA clusters. One restriction is the ability for customers to use the central Alertmanager that is owned and managed by the SRE team. They can't give access to the central managed secret due to security concerns so that users can add their own routing information.

High-Level Approach

Provide a new API (based on the Operator CRD approach) as part of the Prometheus Operator that allows creating a subset of the Alertmanager configuration without touching the central Alertmanager configuration file.

Please note that we do not plan to support additional individual webhooks with this work. Customers will need to deploy their own version of the third party webhooks.

Goal & Success

• Allow users to deploy individual configurations that allow setting up Alertmanager for their needs without an administrator.

Solution Alignment

Key Capabilities

• As an OpenShift administrator, I want to control who can CRUD individual configuration so that I can make sure that any unknown third person can touch the central Alertmanager instance shipped within OpenShift Monitoring.
• As a team owner, I want to deploy a routing configuration to push notifications for alerts to my system of choice.

Key Flows

Team A wants to send all their important notifications to a specific Slack channel.

• Administrator gives permission to Team A to allow creating a new configuration CR in their individual namespace.
• Team A creates a new configuration CR.
• Team A configures what alerts should go into their Slack channel.
• Open Questions & Key Decisions (optional)
• Do we want to improve anything inside the developer console to allow configuration?

Copy/paste from [_https://github.com/openshift-cs/managed-openshift/issues/60_]

Which service is this feature request for?
OpenShift Dedicated and Red Hat OpenShift Service on AWS

What are you trying to do?
Allow ROSA/OSD to integrate with AWS Managed Prometheus.

Describe the solution you'd like
Remote-write of metrics is supported in OpenShift but it does not work with AWS Managed Prometheus since AWS Managed Prometheus requires AWS SigV4 auth.

• Note that Prometheus supports AWS SigV4 since v2.26 and OpenShift 4.9 uses v2.29.

Describe alternatives you've considered
There is the workaround to use the "AWS SigV4 Proxy" but I'd think this is not properly supported by RH.
https://mobb.ninja/docs/rosa/cluster-metrics-to-aws-prometheus/

Additional context
The customer wants to use an open and portable solution to centralize metrics storage and analysis. If they also deploy to other clouds, they don't want to have to re-configure. Since most clouds offer a Prometheus service (or it's easy to self-manage Prometheus), app migration should be simplified.

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.

Feature Overview.

Early customer feedback is that they see SNO as a great solution covering smaller footprint deployment, but are wondering what is the evolution story OpenShift is going to provide where more capacity or high availability are needed in the future.

While migration tooling (moving workload/config to new cluster) could be a mid-term solution, customer desire is not to include extra hardware to be involved in this process.

 For Telecommunications Providers, at the Far Edge they intend to start small and then grow. Many of these operators will start with a SNO-based DU deployment as an initial investment, but as DUs evolve, different segments of the radio spectrum are added, various radio hardware is provisioned and features delivered to the Far Edge, the Telecommunication Providers desire the ability for their Far Edge deployments to scale up from 1 node to 2 nodes to n nodes. On the opposite side of the spectrum from SNO is MMIMO where there is a robust cluster and workloads use HPA.

Goals

• Provide the capability to expand a single replica control plane topology to host more workloads capacity - add worker
• Provide the capability to expand a single replica control plane to be a highly available control plane
• To satisfy MMIMO Telecommunications providers will want the ability to scale a SNO to a multi-node cluster that can support HPA.
• Telecommunications providers do not want workload (DU specifically) downtime when migrating from SNO to a multi-node cluster.
• Telecommunications providers wish to be able to scale from one to two or more nodes to support a variety of radio hardware.
• Support CP scaling (CP HA) for 2 node cluster, 3 node cluster and n node cluster. As the number of nodes in the cluster increases so does the failure domain of the cluster. The cluster is now supporting more cell sectors and therefore has more of a need for HA and resiliency including the cluster CP.

Requirements

• TBD

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section:

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Feature Overview

• As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.

• As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

• Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

• Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
• Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
• Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
• Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
• In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
• For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
• Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
• The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
• The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

• As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
• As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
• As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
• As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
• As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

• As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
• As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

• This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

References

• Bootable Ephemeral Installer Image for Disconnected Cluster 0 Deployments

Feature Overview

The AWS-specific code added in OCPPLAN-6006 needs to become GA and with this we want to introduce a couple of Day2 improvements.
Currently the AWS tags are defined and applied at installation time only and saved in the infrastructure CRD's status field for further operator use, which in turn just add the tags during creation.

Saving in the status field means it's not included in Velero backups, which is a crucial feature for customers and Day2.
Thus the status.resourceTags field should be deprecated in favour of a newly created spec.resourceTags with the same content. The installer should only populate the spec, consumers of the infrastructure CRD must favour the spec over the status definition if both are supplied, otherwise the status should be honored and a warning shall be issued.

Being part of the spec, the behaviour should also tag existing resources that do not have the tags yet and once the tags in the infrastructure CRD are changed all the AWS resources should be updated accordingly.

On AWS this can be done without re-creating any resources (the behaviour is basically an upsert by tag key) and is possible without service interruption as it is a metadata operation.

Tag deletes continue to be out of scope, as the customer can still have custom tags applied to the resources that we do not want to delete.

Due to the ongoing intree/out of tree split on the cloud and CSI providers, this should not apply to clusters with intree providers (!= "external").

Once confident we have all components updated, we should introduce an end2end test that makes sure we never create resources that are untagged.

After that, we can remove the experimental flag and make this a GA feature.

Goals

• Inclusion in the cluster backups
• Flexibility of changing tags during cluster lifetime, without recreating the whole cluster

Requirements

• This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

List any affected packages or components.

• Installer
• Cluster Infrastructure
• Storage
• Node
• NetworkEdge
• Internal Registry
• CCO

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.
<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Feature --->
<--- Remove the descriptive text as appropriate --->

Feature Overview

• As RH OpenShift Product Owners, we want to enable new providers/platforms/service with varying levels of capabilities and integration with minimal reliance on OpenShift Engineering.
• As a new provider/platform partner, I want to enable my solution (hardware and/or software) with OpenShift with minimal effort.

Problem

• It is currently challenging for us to enable new platforms / providers without taking the heavy burden on doing the platform specific development ourselves.

Goals

• We want to enable the long-tail new platforms/providers to expand our reach into new markets and/or support new use cases.
• We want to remove strict dependencies we have on Engineering teams to review, support and test new providers.
• We want to lower the effort required for onboarding new platforms/providers.
• We want to enable new platform/providers to self-certify.
• We want to define tiered model for provider/platform integration that delineates ownership and responsibilities throughout new provider/platform development lifecycle and support model.
• We want to reduce time to onboard new provider/platform – ideally to a single release.
• We want to maintain consistent customer experience across all providers/platforms.

Requirements

• Step-by-step guide on how to add a new platform/provider for each tier
• Certification tool for partner to self-certify
• Certification tool results for (at least) each Y/minor release submitted by partner to Red Hat for acknowledgement
• DCI program to enable partners to run CI with OpenShift on their platform
• Well documented, accessible, and up-to-date test suites for providing the test coverage of the partner
• CI includes upgrade testing of OpenShift with partner's components
• Partner component upgrade failure should not block OpenShift upgrade
• Partner code is available in repositories in the openshift org on github with an open source license compatible with OpenShift

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section:

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

References

• [ Notes - OpenShift Everywhere - Onboarding new providers/platforms|https://www.google.com/url?q=[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M1zLG2-wmkeCWTS8omN5G8vsDKvDeZfmegsi7cCVh-U/edit?usp%3Dsharing&sa=D&source=calendar&ust=1641920246517943&usg=AOvVaw2ZIl_XuE7OsSr4wCmRjOp3]] 
• OKD Installer Architecture Brainstorming Working Group Meeting Minutes
• New-Platform Documentation Working Group Meeting Minutes

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

• Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
• Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

• Core Networking Stability
• Core Networking Performance and Scale
• Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
• Core Networking UX (Observability)
• Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

• Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
• SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
• Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

• CNV
• Service Mesh
• CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.

Relevant links:

• Documentation:
  • Edge Diagnostics Scratchpad, our team's internal diagnostic guide.
  • Troubleshooting OCP networking issues - The complete guide, the SDN team's diagnostic guide.
  • Linux Performance, Brendan Gregg's guide to analyzing Linux performance issues.
  • RFC: A proper feedback loop on Alerts.
  • OpenShift Router Reload Technical Overview on Access.
  • Performance Scaling HAProxy with OpenShift on Access.
  • How to collect worker metrics to troubleshoot CPU load, memory pressure and interrupt issues and networking on worker nodes in OCP 4 on Access.
  • OpenShift Performance and Scale Knowledge Base on Mojo, results from OpenShift scalability testing.
  • Scalability and performance, OCP 4.5 documentation about the router's currently known scalability limits.
  • Scaling OpenShift Container Platform HAProxy Router, OCP 3.11 documentation about the manual performance configuration that was possible in OCP 3.
  • Timing web requests with cURL and Chrome from the Cloudflare blog.
  • tcpdump advanced filters, some useful tcpdump commands.
  • OpenShift SDN - Networking, OCP 3.11 documentation on the SDN (useful background reading).
  • Ingress Operator and Controller Status Conditions, design document for improved status condition reporting.
  • Observability tips for HAProxy, a slide deck by Willy Tarreau.
  • Interesting Traces - Out of Order versus Retransmissions, analysis using tshark.
  • The PCP Book: A Complete Documentation of Performance Co-Pilot, by Yogesh Babar.
  • Debugging kernel networking bug, brief guide to using SystemTap on RHCOS.
  • Troubleshooting throughput issues from the OCP 4.5 documentation.
  • Troubleshooting OpenShift Clusters and Workloads.
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux Network Performance Tuning Guide (PDF).
  • openshift/enhancements#289 stability: point to point network check, a diagnostic built into the kube-apiserver operator.
• Diagnostic tools:
  • dropwatch to watch for packet drops.
  • ethtool to check NIC configuration.
  • iovisor/bcc: BCC - Tools for BPF-based Linux IO analysis, networking, monitoring, and more to trace and diagnose various issues in the networking stack.
  • r-curler to gather timing information about HTTP/HTTPS connections.
  • route-monitor, to monitor routes for reachability.
  • hping(3), a programmable packet generator.
  • OpenTracing / Jaeger in OpenShift.
  • node-problem-detector, a possible integration point for new diagnostics.
  • Using SystemTap by Brendan Gregg.
  • DTrace SystemTap cheatsheet (PDF).
• Visualization and more sophisticated diagnostic tools:
  • eldadru/ksniff, kubectl plugin for tcpdump & Wireshark.
  • ironcladlou/ditm, Dan's "Dan in the Middle" tool.
  • Skydive, network diagnostic and visualization tool.
  • ali, a "load testing tool capable of performing real-time analysis" with visualization.
• Testing tools:
  • stress-ng, a general stress-loading tool (CPU, filesystem, network, ...).
  • mb, the networking benchmarking tool written and used by Jiri Mencak from our Perf+Scale team.
• Case studies:
  • BZ1763206 is an example of diagnosing DNS latency/timeouts.
  • BZ1829779 Investigation details the diagnosis of route latency.
  • BZ1845545 is an example of diagnosing misconfigured DNS for an external LB.
  • Debugging network stalls on Kubernetes, from the GitHub Blog, about diagnosing Kubernetes performance issues related to ksoftirqd.

Feature Overview

• This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary

• Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

Goals

• This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature

• …

Requirements

• This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories

• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories

• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?

• Does this feature have doc impact?  

• New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact

• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.

• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?

• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?

• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?

• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.

• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Feature Overview

Customers are asking for improvements to the upgrade experience (both over-the-air and disconnected). This is a feature tracking epics required to get that work done.  

Goals

1. Have an option to do upgrades in more discrete steps under admin control. Specifically, these steps are: 
   • Control plane upgrade
   • Worker nodes upgrade
   • Workload enabling upgrade (i..e. Router, other components) or infra nodes
2. Better visibility into any errors during the upgrades and documentation of what they error means and how to recover. 
3. An user experience around an end-2-end back-up and restore after a failed upgrade 
4. OTA-810  - Better Documentation: 
   • Backup procedures before upgrades. 
   • More control over worker upgrades (with tagged pools between user Vs admin)
   • The kinds of pre-upgrade tests that are run, the errors that are flagged and what they mean and how to address them. 
   • Better explanation of each discrete step in upgrades, and what each CVO Operator is doing and potential errors, troubleshooting and mitigating actions.

References

• OpenShift Upgrades Customer Issues Discussion -6/22/2023
• Select Customer Experiences and Feedback on Upgrades

Feature Overview

Enable sharing ConfigMap and Secret across namespaces

Requirements

Questions to answer…

NA

Out of Scope

NA

Background, and strategic fit

Consumption of RHEL entitlements has been a challenge on OCP 4 since it moved to a cluster-based entitlement model compared to the node-based (RHEL subscription manager) entitlement mode. In order to provide a sufficiently similar experience to OCP 3, the entitlement certificates that are made available on the cluster (OCPBU-93) should be shared across namespaces in order to prevent the need for cluster admin to copy these entitlements in each namespace which leads to additional operational challenges for updating and refreshing them. 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:
 * What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
 * Does this feature have doc impact?
 * New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
 * If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
 * What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
 * How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
 * What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
 * Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
 * What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Goal

Increase integration of Shipwright, Tekton, Argo CD in OpenShift GitOps with OpenShift platform and related products such as ACM.

Summary (PM+lead)

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AUTH-2 revealed that, in prinicipal, Pod Security Admission is possible to integrate into OpenShift while retaining SCC functionality.

This epic is about the concrete steps to enable Pod Security Admission by default in OpenShift

Motivation (PM+lead)

Goals (lead)

• Enable Pod Security Admission in "restricted" policy level by default
• Migrate existing core workloads to comply to the "restricted" pod security policy level

Non-Goals (lead)

• Other OpenShift workloads must be migrated by the individual responsible teams.

Deliverables

Proposal (lead)

Enhancement - https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1010

User Stories (PM)

Dependencies (internal and external, lead)

Previous Work (lead)

Open questions (lead)

1. ...

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-authentication-operator/pull/570
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator/pull/120
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-samples-operator/pull/425

Epic Goal

HyperShift provisions OpenShift clusters with externally managed control-planes. It follows a slightly different process for provisioning clusters. For example, HyperShift uses cluster API as a backend and moves all the machine management bits to the management cluster.  

Why is this important?

showing machine management/cluster auto-scaling tabs in the console is likely to confuse users and cause unnecessary side effects. 

Definition of Done

• MachineConfig and MachineConfigPool should not be present, they should be either removed or hidden when the cluster is spawned using HyperShift. 
• Cluster Settings show say the control plane is externally managed and be read-only.
• Cluster Settings -> Configuration resources should be read-only, maybe hide the tab
• Some resources should go in an allowlist. Most will be hidden
• Review getting started steps

See Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k76JtRRHBdCCEjHPqKcYvbNVsuaGmRhWDLESWIm0mbo/edit#

Setup / Testing

It's based on the SERVER_FLAG controlPlaneTopology being set to External is really the driving factor here; this can be done in one of two ways:

• Locally via a Bridge Variable, export BRIDGE_CONTROL_PLANE_TOPOLOGY_MODE="External"
• Locally / OnCluster via modifying the window.SERVER_FLAGS.controlPlaneTopology to External in the dev tools

To test work related to cluster upgrade process, use a 4.10.3 cluster set on the candidate-4.10 upgrade channel using 4.11 frontend code.

Epic Goal

• Ensure that OCP Admin console can enable dark mode
• Mechanism for switching between light/dark mode, based on user preferences or User Settings in OCP
• Identify changes needed for OCP console's dynamic plugins
• Status as we work through the stories: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18ib0A9ZtSYo1e2aOtM2LtZcsNFs1aRCHXx6NAPsIAso/edit#

Why is this important?

• So the UX satisfies the current trands, where dark mode is becoming a standard for modern services.  

Acceptance Criteria

• OCP admin console must be rendered in a preferred mode based on `prefers-color-scheme` media query
• OCP admin console must be rendered in a preferred mode selected in the User Setting page
• Create an followup epic/story for and listing and tracking changes needed in OCP console's dynamic plugins

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. PatternFly - Dark mode PF variables

Previous Work (Optional):

1. Mike Coker has worked on a POC from the PF point of view on both the admin and dev console, and the screenshot results are listed below along with the repo branch. Also listed is a document covering some of the common issues found when putting together the admin console POC. https://github.com/mcoker/console/tree/dark-theme
   Background POC work completed for reference:

PatternFly Dark Theme Handbook: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mRYEfUoOjTsSt7hiqjbeplqhfo3_rVDO0QqMj2p67pw/edit

Admin Console -> Workloads & Pods

• Screenshots: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BoOpXpX96_uNUhVJiEqGUCZ-JMYh1A78fXJhk3H86K8/edit#slide=id.p
• Github branch: https://github.com/mcoker/console/tree/dark-theme
• Github PR for Dark Theme WIP by Vikram: https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/10947{}

Dev Console -> Gotcha pages: Observe Dashboard and Metrics, Add, Pipelines: builder, list, log, and run

• Screenshots: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/13jagAf_JEu82hd_KpEHRmj25xCEqwImWpNufzVopuUs/edit#slide=id.p
• Github branch: https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/10815
• Evaluation: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fBCPPb4Z1sqUDKgQkpueGe8VQZo4pBUA9PV4vnFCnDw/edit#gid=0

Open questions::

1. Who should be responsible for updating DynamicPlugins to be able to render in dark mode?

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

• Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

Goal

• Add the ability for users to select supported but not recommended updates.
• Refine workflow when both "upgradeable=false" and "supported-but-not-recommended" updates occur

Background
RFE: for 4.10, Cincinnati and the cluster-version operator are adding conditional updates (a.k.a. targeted edge blocking): https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OTA-267

High-level plans in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#update-client-support-for-the-enhanced-schema

Example of what the oc adm upgrade UX will be in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#cluster-administrator.

The oc implementation landed via https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/961.

Design

• Use case 01: "supported but not recommended" occurs to the latest version:
  • Add an info icon next to the version on update path with a pop-over to explain about why updating to this version is supported, but not recommended and a link to known risks
  • Identify the difference in "recommended" versions, "supported but not recommended" versions, and "blocked" versions (upgradeable=false) in the + more modal.
  • The latest version is pre-selected in the dropdown in the update modal with an inline alert to inform users about supported-but-not-recommended version with link to known risks. Users can choose to update to another recommended versions, update to a supported-but-not-recommended one, or wait.
  • The "recommended" and "supported but not recommended" updates are separated in the dropdown.
  • If a user selects a "recommended" update, the inline alert disappears.
• Use case 02: When both "upgradeable=false" and "supported but not recommended" occur:
  • Add an alert banner to explain why users shouldn’t update to the latest version and link to how to resolve on the cluster settings details page. Users have the options to resolve the issue, update to a patch version, or wait.
  • If users open the update modal without resolving the "upgradeable=false" issue, the next recommended version is pre-selected. An expandable link "View blocked versions (#)" is included under the dropdown to show "upgradeable=false" versions with resolve link.
  • If users resolve the "upgradeable=false" issue, the cluster settings page will change to use case 01

• • Question: Priority on changing the upgradeable=false alert banner in update modal and blocked versions in dropdown

See design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Nja4whdsI5dKmQNS_rXyN8IGtRXDJ8gXuU_eSxBLMIY/edit#

See marvel: https://marvelapp.com/prototype/h3ehaa4/screen/86077932

Epic Goal

• Add telemetry so that we know how image stream features are used.

Why is this important?

• We have a long standing epic to create image streams v2. We need to better understand how image streams are used today.

Scenarios

1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

1. …

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Epic Goal

• Make the image registry distributed across availability zones.

Why is this important?

• The registry should be highly available and zone failsafe.

Scenarios

1. As an administrator I want to rely on a default configuration that spreads image registry pods across topology zones so that I don't suffer from a long recovery time (>6 mins) in case of a complete zone failure if all pods are impacted.

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Pod's topologySpreadConstraints

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-image-registry-operator/pull/730
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Goal

Remove Jenkins from the OCP Payload.

Problem

• Jenkins images are "non-trival in size, impact experience around OCP payloads
• Security advisories cannot be handled once, but against all actively supported OCP releases, adding to response time for handling said advisories
• Some customers may now want to upgrade Jenkins as OCP upgrades (making this configurable is more ideal)

Why is this important

• This is an engineering motivated item to reduce costs so we have more cycles for strategic work
• Aside from the team itself, top level OCP architects want this to reduce the image size, improve general OCP upgrade experience
• Sends a mix message with respect to what is startegic CI/CI when Jenkins is baked into OCP, but Tekton/Pipelines is an add-on, day 2 install sort of thing

Dependencies (internal and external)

See epic linking - need alternative non payload image available to provide relatively seamless migration

Also, the EP for this is approved and merged at https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/builds/remove-jenkins-payload.md

Estimate (xs, s, m, l, xl, xxl):

Questions:

• in addition to needing the CPaaS Image available first, have we confirmed the "deprecate first, then remove" requirements?  Per grooming we've assigned Rob Gormley the task https://issues.redhat.com/browse/JKNS-274 for tracking this down.  I will be reaching out to Ben Parees (he is currently on vacation) to confirm from an OCP staff engineer / architect perspective if his approval of https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/841 is sufficient signoff from that end.

       PARTIAL ANSWER ^^:  confirmed with Ben Parees in https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C014MHHKUSF/p1646683621293839 that EP merging is currently sufficient OCP "technical leadership" approval.

Previous work

Customers

assuming none

Epic Goal

• Remove this UI from our stack that we cannot support.

Why is this important?

• Reduce support burden.
• Remove Bugzilla burden of addressing continuous CVEs found in this project.

Acceptance Criteria

• All Prometheus upstream UI links are removed
• Related documentation is updated
• Ports/routes etc configured to expose access to this UI are removed such that no configuration we provide enables access to this UI or its codepaths.
• There is no reason any CVEs found in this UI would ever require intervention by the Monitoring Team.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Make the Prometheus Targets information available in Console UI (https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1079)

Previous Work (Optional):

1. …

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Epic Goal

When users configure CMO to interact with systems outside of an OpenShift cluster, we want to provide an easy way to add the cluster ID to the data send.

Why is this important?

Technically this can be achieved today, by adding an identifying label to the remote_write configuration for a given cluster. The operator adding the remote_write integration needs to take care that the label is unique over the managed fleet of clusters. This however adds management complexity. Any given cluster already has a pseudo-unique datum, that can be used for this purpose.

• Starting in 4.9 we support the Prometheus remote_write feature to send metric data to a storage integration outside of the cluster similar to our own Telemetry service.
• In Telemetry we already use the cluster ID to distinguish the various clusters.
• For users of remote_write this could add an easy way to add such distinguishing information.

Scenarios

1. An organisation with multiple OpenShift clusters want to store their metric data centralized in a dedicated system and use remote_write in all their clusters to send this data. When querying their centralized storage, metadata (here a label) is needed to separate the data of the various clusters.
2. Service providers who manage multiple clusters for multiple customers via a centralized storage system need distinguishing metadata too. See https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSD-6573 for example

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• Document how to use this feature

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. none

Previous Work (Optional):

1. none

Open questions::

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Implementation proposal:

Expose a flag in the CMO configuration, that is false by default (keeps backward compatibility) and when set to true will add the _id label to a remote_write configuration. More specifically it will be added to the top of a remote_write relabel_config list via the replace action. This will add the label as expect, but additionally a user could alter this label in a later relabel config to suit any specific requirements (say rename the label or add additional information to the value).
The location of this flag is the remote_write Spec, so this can be set for individual remote_write configurations.

Epic Goal

• Offer the option to double the scrape intervals for CMO controlled ServiceMonitors in single node deployments
• Alternatively automatically double the same scrape intervals if CMO detects an SNO setup

The potential target ServiceMonitors are:

• kubelet
• kube-state-metrics
• node-exporter
• etcd
• openshift-state-metrics

Why is this important?

• Reduce CPU usage in SNO setups
• Specifically doubling the scrape interval is important because:

1. we are confident that this will have the least chance to interfere with existing rules. We typically have rate queries over the last 2 minutes (no shorter time window). With 30 second scrape intervals (the current default) this gives us 4 samples in any 2 minute window. rate needs at least 2 samples to work, we want another 2 for failure tolerance. Doubling the scrape interval will still give us 2 samples in most 2 minute windows. If a scrape fails, a few rule evaluations might fail intermittently.
2. We expect a measureable reduction of CPU resources (see previous work)

Scenarios

1. RAN deployments (Telco Edge) are SNO deployments. In these setups a full CMO deployment is often not needed and the default setup consumes too many resources. OpenShift as a whole has only very limited CPU cycles available and too many cycles are spend on Monitoring

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• ...

Previous Work (Optional):

1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1569

Open questions:

1. Whether doubling some scrape intervals reduces CPU usage to fit into the assigned budget

Non goals

• Allow arbitrarily long scrape intervals. This will interfere with alert and recoring rules
• Implement a global override to scrape intervals.

Problem:

This epic is mainly focused on the 4.10 Release QE activities

Goal:

1. Identify the scenarios for automation
2. Segregate the test Scenarios into smoke, Regression and other user stories
a. Update the https://docs.jboss.org/display/ODC/Automation+Status+Report
3. Align with layered operator teams for updating scripts
3. Work closely with dev team for epic automation
4. Create the automation scripts using cypress
5. Implement CI for nightly builds
6. Execute scripts on sprint basis

Why is it important?

To the track the QE progress at one place in 4.10 Release Confluence page

Use cases:

1. <case>

Acceptance criteria:

1. <criteria>

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Goal:

This epic covers a number of customer requests(RFEs) as well as increases usability.

Why is it important?

Customer satisfaction as well as improved usability.

Acceptance Criteria

1. Allow user to re-arrange the resources which have ben added to nav by the user
2. Improved user experience (form based experience)
   1. Form based editing of Routes
   2. Form based creation and editing of Config Maps
   3. Form base creation of Deployments
3. Improved discovery
   1. Include Share my project on the Add page to increase discoverability
   2. NS Helm Chart Repo
      1. Add tile to Add page for discoverability
      2. Provide a form driven creation experience
      3. User should be able to switch back and forth from Form/YAML
      4. change the intro text to the below & have the link in the intro text bring up the full page form
         1. Browse for charts that help manage complex installations and upgrades. Cluster administrators can customize the content made available in the catalog. Alternatively, developers can try to configure their own custom Helm Chart repository.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

None

Exploration:

Miro board from Epic Exploration

Problem:

Currently we are only able to get limited telemetry from the Dev Sandbox, but not from any of our managed clusters or on prem clusters.

Goals:

1. Enable gathering segment telemetry whenever cluster telemetry is enabled on OSD clusters
2. Have our OSD clusters opt into telemetry by default
3. Work with PM & UX to identify additional metrics to capture in addition to what we have enabled currently on Sandbox.
4. Ability to get a single report from woopra across all of our Sandbox and OSD clusters.
5. Be able to generate a report including metrics of a single cluster or all clusters of a certain type ( sandbox, or OSD)

Why is it important?

In order to improve properly analyze usage and the user experience, we need to be able to gather as much data as possible.

Goal:
Enhance oc adm release new (and related verbs info, extract, mirror) with heterogeneous architecture support

Epic Goal

• Update image registry dependencies (Kubernetes and OpenShift) to the latest versions.

Why is this important?

• New versions usually bring improvements that are needed by the registry and help with getting updates for z-stream.

Scenarios

1. As an OpenShift engineer, I want my components to use the versions of dependencies, so that they get fixes for known issues and can be easily updated in z-stream.

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Kubernetes 1.24

Previous Work (Optional):

1. IR-210

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>

Epic Goal

• Provide a dedicated dashboard for NVIDIA GPU usage visualization in the OpenShift Console.

Why is this important?

• Customers that use GPUs in their clusters usually have the GPU workloads as the main purpose of their cluster. As such, it makes much more sense to have the details about the usage they are doing of GPGPU resources AND CPU/RAM rather than just CPU/RAM

Scenarios

1. As an admin of a cluster dedicated to data science, I want to quickly find out how much of my very costly resources are currently in use and if things are getting queued due to lack of resources

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. The NVIDIA GPU Operator must export to prometheus the relevant data

Open questions::

1. Will NVIDIA agree to these extra data exports in their GPU Operator?

I asked Zvonko Kaiser and he seemed open to it. I need to confirm with Shiva Merla

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

• Run OpenShift builds that do not execute as the "root" user on the host node.

Why is this important?

• OpenShift builds require an elevated set of capabilities to build a container image
• Builds currently run as root to maintain adequate performance
• Container workloads should run as non-root from the host's perspective. Containers running as root are a known security risk.
• Builds currently run as root and require a privileged container. See BUILD-225 for removing the privileged container requirement.

Scenarios

1. Run BuildConfigs in a multi-tenant environment
2. Run BuildConfigs in a heightened security environment/deployment

Acceptance Criteria

• Developers can opt into running builds in a cri-o user namespace by providing an environment variable with a specific value.
• When the correct environment variable is provided, builds run in a cri-o user namespace, and the build pod does not require the "privileged: true" security context.
• User namespace builds can pass basic test scenarios for the Docker and Source strategy build.
• Steps to run unprivileged builds are documented.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Buildah supports running inside a non-privileged container
2. CRI-O allows workloads to opt into running containers in user namespaces.

Previous Work (Optional):

1. BUILD-225 - remove privileged requirement for builds.

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

• https://github.com/openshift/vmware-vsphere-csi-driver/pull/58

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1290

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3434

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1498

• https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1509
• https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/27796

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10514. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10221. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5469. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

When changing channels it's possible that multiple new conditional update risks will need to be evaluated. For instance, a cluster running 4.10.34 in a 4.10 channel today only has to evaluate `OpenStackNodeCreationFails` but when the channel is changed to a 4.11 channel multiple new risks require evaluation and the evaluation of new risks is throttled at one every 10 minutes. This means if there are three new risks it may take up to 30 minutes after the channel has changed for the full set of conditional updates to be computed. This leads to a perception that no update paths are recommended because most will not wait 30 minutes, they expect immediate feedback.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.z, 4.11.z, 4.12, 4.13

How reproducible:

100% 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install 4.10.34
2. Switch from stable-4.10 to stable-4.11
3. 

Actual results:

Observe no recommended updates for 10-20 minutes because all available paths to 4.11 have a risk associated with them

Expected results:

Risks are computed in a timely manner for an interactive UX, lets say < 10s

Additional info:

This was intentional in the design, we didn't want risks to continuously re-evaluate or overwhelm the monitoring stack, however we didn't anticipate that we'd have long standing pile of risks and realize how confusing the user experience would be.

We intend to work around this in the deployed fleet by converting older risks from `type: promql` to `type: Always` avoiding the evaluation period but preserving the notification. While this may lead customers to believe they're exposed to a risk they may not be, as long as the set of outstanding risks to the latest version is limited to no more than one it's likely no one will notice. All 4.10 and 4.11 clusters currently have a clear path toward relatively recent 4.10.z or 4.11.z with no more than one risk to be evaluated.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pull/915

Tracker issue for bootimage bump in 4.11. This issue should block issues which need a bootimage bump to fix.

The previous bump was OCPBUGS-562.

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6720

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator/pull/1821

The kube-state-metric pod inside the openshift-monitoring namespace is not running as expected.

On checking the logs I am able to see that there is a memory panic

~~~
2022-11-22T09:57:17.901790234Z I1122 09:57:17.901768 1 main.go:199] Starting kube-state-metrics self metrics server: 127.0.0.1:8082
2022-11-22T09:57:17.901975837Z I1122 09:57:17.901951 1 main.go:66] levelinfomsgTLS is disabled.http2false
2022-11-22T09:57:17.902389844Z I1122 09:57:17.902291 1 main.go:210] Starting metrics server: 127.0.0.1:8081
2022-11-22T09:57:17.903191857Z I1122 09:57:17.903133 1 main.go:66] levelinfomsgTLS is disabled.http2false
2022-11-22T09:57:17.906272505Z I1122 09:57:17.906224 1 builder.go:191] Active resources: certificatesigningrequests,configmaps,cronjobs,daemonsets,deployments,endpoints,horizontalpodautoscalers,ingresses,jobs,leases,limitranges,mutatingwebhookconfigurations,namespaces,networkpolicies,nodes,persistentvolumeclaims,persistentvolumes,poddisruptionbudgets,pods,replicasets,replicationcontrollers,resourcequotas,secrets,services,statefulsets,storageclasses,validatingwebhookconfigurations,volumeattachments
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z E1122 09:57:17.917560 1 runtime.go:78] Observed a panic: "invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" (runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z goroutine 24 [running]:
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.logPanic(

)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:1038 +0x215
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/v2/internal/store.ingressMetricFamilies.func6(0x40)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /go/src/k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/internal/store/ingress.go:136 +0x189
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/v2/internal/store.wrapIngressFunc.func1(

)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /go/src/k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/pkg/metric_generator/generator.go:107 +0xd8
~~~

Logs are attached to the support case

• https://github.com/openshift/kube-state-metrics/pull/85

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-provider-openstack/pull/57

Description of problem:

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Enable UWM + dedicated UWM Alertmanager
2. Deploy an application + service monitor + alerting rule which fires always
3. Go to the OCP dev console and silence the alert.

Actual results:
Nothing happens

Expected results:
The alert notification is muted.

Additional info:
Copied from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100860

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator/pull/1781
• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12104
• https://github.com/openshift/console-operator/pull/685

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-683. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

{See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118563#c5,
The following messages here are "normal" on startup, but it is very misleading with error statement, suggest suppress them or update them to some more clear context that we can know they are in normal process.

E0818 02:18:53.709223       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.715530       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.735885       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.775984       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.790449       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.856911       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.950782       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.017583       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.271967       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.338944       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.916988       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.982211       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue}

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/pull/85

Description of problem:

In order to understand what is going on with OCPBUGS-5379 we want to add more logs

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3497

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7960. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7780. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

4.9 and 4.10 oc calls to oc adm upgrade channel ... for 4.11+ clusters would clear spec.capabilities. Not all that many clusters try to restrict capabilities, but folks will need to bump their channel for at least every other minor (if their using EUS channels), and while we recommend folks use an oc from the 4.y they're heading towards, we don't have anything in place to enforce that.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.9 and 4.10 oc are exposed vs. the new-in-4.11 spec.capabilities. Newer oc could theoretically be exposed vs. any new ClusterVersion spec capabilities.

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install a 4.11+ cluster with None capabilities.
2. Set the channel with a 4.10.51 oc, like oc adm upgrade channel fast-4.11.
3. Check the capabilities with oc get -o json clusterversion version | jq -c .spec.capabilities.

Actual results:

null

Expected results:

{"baselineCapabilitySet":"None"}

• https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/1360

Description of problem:

If you set a services cluster IP to an IP with a leading zero (e.g. 192.168.0.011), ovn-k should normalise this and remove the leading zero before sending it to ovn.

This was seen by me on a CI run executing the k8 test here: test/e2e/network/funny_ips.go +75

you can reproduce using that above test.

Have a read of the text there:

 43 // What are funny IPs:  
 44 // The adjective is because of the curl blog that explains the history and the problem of liberal  
 45 // parsing of IP addresses and the consequences and security risks caused the lack of normalization,
 46 // mainly due to the use of different notations to abuse parsers misalignment to bypass filters.
 47 // xref: https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2021/04/19/curl-those-funny-ipv4-addresses/   
 48 //     
 49 // Since golang 1.17, IPv4 addresses with leading zeros are rejected by the standard library.
 50 // xref: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/30999
 51 //     
 52 // Because this change on the parsers can cause that previous valid data become invalid, Kubernetes
 53 // forked the old parsers allowing leading zeros on IPv4 address to not break the compatibility.
 54 //     
 55 // Kubernetes interprets leading zeros on IPv4 addresses as decimal, users must not rely on parser
 56 // alignment to not being impacted by the associated security advisory: CVE-2021-29923 golang
 57 // standard library "net" - Improper Input Validation of octal literals in golang 1.16.2 and below
 58 // standard library "net" results in indeterminate SSRF & RFI vulnerabilities. xref:
 59 // https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-29923                                                                                                     

northd is logging an error about this also:

|socket_util|ERR|172.30.0.011:7180: bad IP address "172.30.0.011" 
...
2022-08-23T14:14:21.968Z|01839|ovn_util|WARN|bad ip address or port for load balancer key 172.30.0.011:7180

Also, I see the error:

E0823 14:14:34.135115    3284 gateway_shared_intf.go:600] Failed to delete conntrack entry for service e2e-funny-ips-8626/funny-ip: failed to delete conntrack entry for service e2e-funny-ips-8626/funny-ip with svcVIP 172.30.0.011, svcPort 7180, protocol TCP: value "<nil>" passed to DeleteConntrack is not an IP address 

We should normalise the IPs before sending to OVN-k. I see also theres conntrack error when trying to set this bad IP.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. See above k8 test

Actual results:

Leading zero IP sent to OVN

Expected results:

No leading zero IP sent to OVN

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1393

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-501. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem: 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.10.16

How reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Edit the apiserver resource and add spec.audit.customRules field

$ oc get apiserver cluster -o yaml
spec:
audit:
customRules:

• group: system:authenticated:oauth
  profile: AllRequestBodies
• group: system:authenticated
  profile: AllRequestBodies
  profile: Default

2. Allow the kube-apiserver pods to rollout new revision.
3. Once the kube-apiserver pods are in new revision execute $ oc get dc

Actual results:

Error from server (InternalError): an error on the server ("This request caused apiserver to panic. Look in the logs for details.") has prevented the request from succeeding (get deploymentconfigs.apps.openshift.io)

Expected results: The command "oc get dc" should display the deploymentconfig without any error.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/openshift-apiserver/pull/336

Description of problem:

The path used by --rotated-pod-logs to gather the rotated pod logs from /var/log/pods node folder via /api/v1/nodes/${NODE}/proxy/logs/${LOG_PATH} is only valid for regular pods but not for static pods.

The main problem is that, while normal pods have their rotated logs at this /var/log/pods/${POD_NAME}_${POD_UID_IN_API}/${CONTAINER_NAME}, static pods have them at /var/log/pods/${POD_NAME}_${CONFIG_HASH}/${CONTAINER_NAME} because the UID cannot be known at the time that the static pod is born (because static pods are created by kubelet before registering them in the kube-apiserver, and UID is assigned by the kube-apiserver).

The visible results of that are:

• Spurious errors of not found resources related to the pods.
• Rotated pod logs are not gathered even if present.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10

How reproducible:

Always if there are static pods.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. oc adm inspect --rotated-pod-logs ns/openshift-etcd (or any other project with static pods).

Actual results:

• Rotated pods not gathered.
• Errors like these

  error: errors occurred while gathering data:
      one or more errors occurred while gathering pod-specific data for namespace: openshift-etcd
  
      [one or more errors occurred while gathering container data for pod etcd-master-0.example.net:
  
      the server could not find the requested resource, one or more errors occurred while gathering container data for pod etcd-master-1.example.net:
  
      the server could not find the requested resource, one or more errors occurred while gathering container data for pod etcd-master-2.example.net:
  
      the server could not find the requested resource]
  

Expected results:

No errors like the ones above and rotated pod logs to be gathered, if present.

Additional info:

Despite being marked as experimental, this --rotated-pod-logs is used in must-gather, so this issue can be easily reproduced by just running a default must-gather. I focused on bare oc adm inspect reproducers for simplicity.

• https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/1239

Created attachment 1905034 [details]
Plugin page with error

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install a plugin with a page that has a runtime error. (Demo Plugin -> Dynamic Nav 1 currently has an error for me, but you can reproduce by editing any plugin and introducing an error.)
2. Observe the "something went wrong" error message.
3. Navigate to any other page (e.g. Workloads -> Pods)

Expected result:

The pods page is displayed.

Action result:

The error message persists. There is no way to clear except to refresh the browser.

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11968

Description of problem:

Create Loadbalancer type service within the OCP 4.11.x OVNKubernetes cluster to expose the api server endpoint, the service does not response for normal oc request. 
But some of them are working, like "oc whoami", "oc get --raw /api"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.8 with OVNKubernetes

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Setup openshift cluster 4.11 on AWS with OVNKubernetes as the default network
2. Create the following service under openshift-kube-apiserver namespace to expose the api
----
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
  annotations:
    service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-connection-idle-timeout: "1800"
  finalizers:
  - service.kubernetes.io/load-balancer-cleanup
  name: test-api
  namespace: openshift-kube-apiserver
spec:
  allocateLoadBalancerNodePorts: true
  externalTrafficPolicy: Cluster
  internalTrafficPolicy: Cluster
  ipFamilies:
  - IPv4
  ipFamilyPolicy: SingleStack
  loadBalancerSourceRanges:
  - <my_ip>/32
  ports:
  - nodePort: 31248
    port: 6443
    protocol: TCP
    targetPort: 6443
  selector:
    apiserver: "true"
    app: openshift-kube-apiserver
  sessionAffinity: None
  type: LoadBalancer

3. Setup the DNS resolution for the access
xxx.mydomain.com ---> <elb-auto-generated-dns>

4. Try to access the cluster api via the service above by updating the kubeconfig to use the custom dns name

Actual results:

No response from the server side.

$ time oc get node -v8
I1025 08:29:10.284069  103974 loader.go:375] Config loaded from file:  bmeng.kubeconfig
I1025 08:29:10.294017  103974 round_trippers.go:420] GET https://rh-api.bmeng-ccs-ovn.3o13.s1.devshift.org:6443/api/v1/nodes?limit=500
I1025 08:29:10.294035  103974 round_trippers.go:427] Request Headers:
I1025 08:29:10.294043  103974 round_trippers.go:431]     Accept: application/json;as=Table;v=v1;g=meta.k8s.io,application/json;as=Table;v=v1beta1;g=meta.k8s.io,application/json
I1025 08:29:10.294052  103974 round_trippers.go:431]     User-Agent: oc/openshift (linux/amd64) kubernetes/e40bd2d
I1025 08:29:10.365119  103974 round_trippers.go:446] Response Status: 200 OK in 71 milliseconds
I1025 08:29:10.365142  103974 round_trippers.go:449] Response Headers:
I1025 08:29:10.365148  103974 round_trippers.go:452]     Audit-Id: 83b9d8ae-05a4-4036-bff6-de371d5bec12
I1025 08:29:10.365155  103974 round_trippers.go:452]     Cache-Control: no-cache, private
I1025 08:29:10.365161  103974 round_trippers.go:452]     Content-Type: application/json
I1025 08:29:10.365167  103974 round_trippers.go:452]     X-Kubernetes-Pf-Flowschema-Uid: 2abc2e2d-ada3-4cb8-a86f-235df3a4e214
I1025 08:29:10.365173  103974 round_trippers.go:452]     X-Kubernetes-Pf-Prioritylevel-Uid: 02f7a188-43c7-4827-af58-5ebe861a1891
I1025 08:29:10.365179  103974 round_trippers.go:452]     Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 08:29:10 GMT
^C
real    17m4.840s
user    0m0.567s
sys    0m0.163s


However, it has the correct response if using --raw to request, eg:
$ oc get --raw /api/v1  --kubeconfig bmeng.kubeconfig 
{"kind":"APIResourceList","groupVersion":"v1","resources":[{"name":"bindings","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Binding","verbs":["create"]},{"name":"componentstatuses","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"ComponentStatus","verbs":["get","list"],"shortNames":["cs"]},{"name":"configmaps","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ConfigMap","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["cm"],"storageVersionHash":"qFsyl6wFWjQ="},{"name":"endpoints","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Endpoints","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["ep"],"storageVersionHash":"fWeeMqaN/OA="},{"name":"events","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Event","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["ev"],"storageVersionHash":"r2yiGXH7wu8="},{"name":"limitranges","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"LimitRange","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["limits"],"storageVersionHash":"EBKMFVe6cwo="},{"name":"namespaces","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"Namespace","verbs":["create","delete","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["ns"],"storageVersionHash":"Q3oi5N2YM8M="},{"name":"namespaces/finalize","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"Namespace","verbs":["update"]},{"name":"namespaces/status","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"Namespace","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"nodes","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"Node","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["no"],"storageVersionHash":"XwShjMxG9Fs="},{"name":"nodes/proxy","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"NodeProxyOptions","verbs":["create","delete","get","patch","update"]},{"name":"nodes/status","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"Node","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"persistentvolumeclaims","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PersistentVolumeClaim","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["pvc"],"storageVersionHash":"QWTyNDq0dC4="},{"name":"persistentvolumeclaims/status","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PersistentVolumeClaim","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"persistentvolumes","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"PersistentVolume","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["pv"],"storageVersionHash":"HN/zwEC+JgM="},{"name":"persistentvolumes/status","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"PersistentVolume","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"pods","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Pod","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["po"],"categories":["all"],"storageVersionHash":"xPOwRZ+Yhw8="},{"name":"pods/attach","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PodAttachOptions","verbs":["create","get"]},{"name":"pods/binding","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Binding","verbs":["create"]},{"name":"pods/ephemeralcontainers","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Pod","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"pods/eviction","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"group":"policy","version":"v1","kind":"Eviction","verbs":["create"]},{"name":"pods/exec","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PodExecOptions","verbs":["create","get"]},{"name":"pods/log","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Pod","verbs":["get"]},{"name":"pods/portforward","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PodPortForwardOptions","verbs":["create","get"]},{"name":"pods/proxy","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PodProxyOptions","verbs":["create","delete","get","patch","update"]},{"name":"pods/status","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Pod","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"podtemplates","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PodTemplate","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"storageVersionHash":"LIXB2x4IFpk="},{"name":"replicationcontrollers","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ReplicationController","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["rc"],"categories":["all"],"storageVersionHash":"Jond2If31h0="},{"name":"replicationcontrollers/scale","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"group":"autoscaling","version":"v1","kind":"Scale","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"replicationcontrollers/status","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ReplicationController","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"resourcequotas","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ResourceQuota","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["quota"],"storageVersionHash":"8uhSgffRX6w="},{"name":"resourcequotas/status","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ResourceQuota","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"secrets","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Secret","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"storageVersionHash":"S6u1pOWzb84="},{"name":"serviceaccounts","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ServiceAccount","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["sa"],"storageVersionHash":"pbx9ZvyFpBE="},{"name":"serviceaccounts/token","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"group":"authentication.k8s.io","version":"v1","kind":"TokenRequest","verbs":["create"]},{"name":"services","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Service","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["svc"],"categories":["all"],"storageVersionHash":"0/CO1lhkEBI="},{"name":"services/proxy","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ServiceProxyOptions","verbs":["create","delete","get","patch","update"]},{"name":"services/status","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Service","verbs":["get","patch","update"]}]}
 

Expected results:

The normal oc request should be working.

Additional info:

There is no such issue for clusters with openshift-sdn with the same OpenShift version and same LoadBalancer service.

We suspected that it might be related to the MTU setting, but this cannot explain why OpenShiftSDN works well.

Another thing might be related is that the OpenShiftSDN is using iptables for service loadbalancing and OVN is dealing that within the OVN services.

Please let me know if any debug log/info is needed.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1505

Discovered in the must gather kubelet_service.log from https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-sdn-upgrade/1586093220087992320

It appears the guard pod names are too long, and being truncated down to where they will collide with those from the other masters.

From kubelet logs in this run:

❯ grep openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste kubelet_service.log
Oct 28 23:58:55.693391 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-1 kubenswrapper[1657]: E1028 23:58:55.693346    1657 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-1" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste"
Oct 28 23:59:03.735726 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-0 kubenswrapper[1670]: E1028 23:59:03.735671    1670 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-0" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste"
Oct 28 23:59:11.168082 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-2 kubenswrapper[1667]: E1028 23:59:11.168041    1667 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-2" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste"

This also looks to be happening for openshift-kube-scheduler-guard, kube-controller-manager-guard, possibly others.

Looks like they should be truncated further to make room for random suffixes in https://github.com/openshift/library-go/blame/bd9b0e19121022561dcd1d9823407cd58b2265d0/pkg/operator/staticpod/controller/guard/guard_controller.go#L97-L98

Unsure of the implications here, it looks a little scary.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator/pull/1429
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-controller-manager-operator/pull/690
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-scheduler-operator/pull/458

Description of problem:

Customer is facing issue similar to https://github.com/devfile/api/issues/897

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.10.17

How reproducible:
N/A
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

Tried working around it with ALL_PROXY but it did not help. Note because the console operator reverts changes pretty quickly testing this was a bit of a PITA

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12028

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1130. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
The test results in sippy look really bad on our less common platforms, but still pretty unacceptable even on core clouds. It's reasonably often the only test that fails. We need to decide what to do here, and we're going to need input from the etcd team.

As of Sep 13th:

• several vsphere and openstack variant combo's fail this test around 24-32% of the time
• aws, amd64, ovn, upgrade, upgrade-micro, ha - fails 6% of the time
• aws, amd64, ovn, upgrade, upgrade-minor, ha - fails 4% of the time
• gcp, amd64, sdn, upgrade, upgrade-minor, ha - fails 8% of the time
• globally across all jobs fails around 3% of the time.

Even on some major variant combos, a 4-8% failure rate is too high.
On Sep 13 arch call (no etcd present), Damien mentioned this might be an upstream alert that just isn't well suited for OpenShift's use cases, is this the case and it needs tuning?

Has the problem been getting worse?

I believe this link https://datastudio.google.com/s/urkKwmmzvgo indicates that this may be the case for 4.12, AWS and Azure are both getting worse in ways that I don't see if we change the release to 4.11 where it looks consistent. gcp seems fine on 4.12. We do not have data for vsphere for some reason.

This link shows the grpc_methods most commonly involved: https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=etcdGRPCRequestsSlow+was+at+or+above&maxAge=48h&context=7&type=junit&name=&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job

At a glance: LeaseGrant, MemberList, Txn, Status, Range.

Broken out of TRT-401
For linking with sippy:
[bz-etcd][invariant] alert/etcdGRPCRequestsSlow should not be at or above info
[sig-arch][bz-etcd][Late] Alerts alert/etcdGRPCRequestsSlow should not be at or above info [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/934

Description of problem:
Cannot scale up worker node have deploying OCP 4.11.1 cluster via UPI on Azure

5h2m Warning FailedCreate machine/pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4 InvalidConfiguration: failed to reconcile machine "pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4": failed to create vm pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4: failure sending request for machine pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4: cannot create vm: compute.VirtualMachinesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=404 - Original Error: Code="NotFound" Message="The Image '/subscriptions/e639e479-2737-4b3d-b338-f1928f6429a1/resourceGroups/mlpipe-2163-azpln-rg/providers/Microsoft.Compute/images/pokus-2knkh-gen2' cannot be found in 'northeurope' region."

Customer would like to have the installer create machineset from the inital installation, therefore Kubernetes manifest files that define the worker machines were not removed during the installation.

Highlights:
Can I please let help verifying if these are the correct steps to have the initial installation created and manage the worker machines?Is there an explanation on how changing the image to -gen2 in [concat(parameters('baseName'),'-gen2')] from the 02_storage.json template can resolve the problem?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Environment:
OCP 4.11.1 UPI install on Azure using ARM
VM size:
bootstrap: Standard_D4s_v3
master: Standard_D4s_v3

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Following the step described in the document: Installing a cluster on Azure using ARM templates .

In the install-config.yaml, worker replicas was set to 0

compute:
- architecture: amd64
  hyperthreading: Enabled
  name: worker
  platform: {}
  replicas: 3   
controlPlane:
  architecture: amd64
  hyperthreading: Enabled
  name: master
  platform: {}
  replicas: 3

After creating the manifests described in this step: Creating the Kubernetes manifest and Ignition config files only control plane machines manifests were removed, worker machines manifests remain untouchedAfter three masters and three worker nodes were created by ARM templates, additional worker were added using machine sets via command

oc scale --replicas=1 machineset cluster-g7rzv-worker-francecentral1 -n openshift-machine-api` 

Actual results:
No addition node visible from `oc get nodes` and the following error occur:

5h2m Warning FailedCreate machine/pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4 InvalidConfiguration: failed to reconcile machine "pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4": failed to create vm pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4: failure sending request for machine pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4: cannot create vm: compute.VirtualMachinesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=404 - Original Error: Code="NotFound" Message="The Image '/subscriptions/e639e479-2737-4b3d-b338-f1928f6429a1/resourceGroups/mlpipe-2163-azpln-rg/providers/Microsoft.Compute/images/pokus-2knkh-gen2' cannot be found in 'northeurope' region."

The customer found out that this can be resolved if changing the -image to -gen2 in [concat(parameters('baseName'),'-gen2')] from the 02_storage.json template

Expected results:
The installer should be able to create and manage machineset

Additional info:
SFDC case #03304526

Slack discussion, might due to MAO not able to support UPI in Azure Thread1, Thread2
 

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6681

Description of problem:

When adding new nodes to the existing cluster, the newly allocated node-subnet can be overlapped with the existing node.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

openshift 4.10.30

How reproducible:

It's quite hard to reproduce but  there is a possibility it can happen any time. 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a OVN dual-stack cluster
2. add nodes to the existing cluster
3. check the allocated node subnet 

Actual results:

Some newly added nodes have the same node-subnet and ovn-k8s-mp0 IP as some existing nodes.

Expected results:

Should have duplicated node-subnet and ovn-k8s-mp0 IP

Additional info:

Additional info can be found at the case 03329155 and the must-gather attached(comment #1) 

% omg logs ovnkube-master-v8crc -n openshift-ovn-kubernetes -c ovnkube-master | grep '2022-09-30T06:42:50.857'
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857031565Z W0930 06:42:50.857020       1 master.go:1422] Did not find any logical switches with other-config
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857112441Z I0930 06:42:50.857099       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.0.0/23 fd02:0:0:4::/64] on Node worker01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857122455Z I0930 06:42:50.857105       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.129.4.0/23 fd02:0:0:a::/64] on Node oam04.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857130289Z I0930 06:42:50.857122       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.0.0/23","fd02:0:0:4::/64"]}] on node worker01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857140773Z I0930 06:42:50.857132       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.129.4.0/23","fd02:0:0:a::/64"]}] on node oam04.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857166726Z I0930 06:42:50.857156       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:5::/64] on Node oam01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857176132Z I0930 06:42:50.857157       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.0.0/23 fd02:0:0:4::/64] on Node rhel01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857176132Z I0930 06:42:50.857167       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:5::/64"]}] on node oam01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857185257Z I0930 06:42:50.857157       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.6.0/23 fd02:0:0:d::/64] on Node call03.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857192996Z I0930 06:42:50.857183       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.0.0/23","fd02:0:0:4::/64"]}] on node rhel01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857200017Z I0930 06:42:50.857190       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.6.0/23","fd02:0:0:d::/64"]}] on node call03.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857282717Z I0930 06:42:50.857258       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.130.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:7::/64] on Node call01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857304886Z I0930 06:42:50.857293       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.130.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:7::/64"]}] on node call01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857338896Z I0930 06:42:50.857314       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.4.0/23 fd02:0:0:9::/64] on Node f501.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857349485Z I0930 06:42:50.857329       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:8::/64] on Node call02.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857371344Z I0930 06:42:50.857354       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.4.0/23","fd02:0:0:9::/64"]}] on node f501.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857371344Z I0930 06:42:50.857361       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:8::/64"]}] on node call02.ss1.samsung.local

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1415

In order to delete the correct GCP cloud resources, the "--credentials-requests-dir" parameter must be passed to "ccoctl gcp delete". This was fixed for 4.12 as part of https://github.com/openshift/cloud-credential-operator/pull/489 but must be backported for previous releases. See https://github.com/openshift/cloud-credential-operator/pull/489#issuecomment-1248733205 for discussion regarding this bug.

To reproduce, create GCP infrastructure with a name parameter that is a subset of another set of GCP infrastructure's name parameter. I will "ccoctl gcp create all" with "name=abutcher-gcp" and "name=abutcher-gcp1".

$ ./ccoctl gcp create-all \
--name=abutcher-gcp \
--region=us-central1 \
--project=openshift-hive-dev \
--credentials-requests-dir=./credrequests

$ ./ccoctl gcp create-all \
--name=abutcher-gcp1 \
--region=us-central1 \
--project=openshift-hive-dev \
--credentials-requests-dir=./credrequests

Running "ccoctl gcp delete --name=abutcher-gcp" will result in GCP infrastructure for both "abutcher-gcp" and "abutcher-gcp1" being deleted. 

$ ./ccoctl gcp delete --name abutcher-gcp --project openshift-hive-dev
2022/10/24 11:30:06 Credentials loaded from file "/home/abutcher/.gcp/osServiceAccount.json"
2022/10/24 11:30:06 Deleted object .well-known/openid-configuration from bucket abutcher-gcp-oidc
2022/10/24 11:30:07 Deleted object keys.json from bucket abutcher-gcp-oidc
2022/10/24 11:30:07 OIDC bucket abutcher-gcp-oidc deleted
2022/10/24 11:30:09 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-openshift-image-registry-gcs deleted
2022/10/24 11:30:10 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-openshift-gcp-ccm deleted
2022/10/24 11:30:11 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-openshift-cloud-network-config-controller-gcp deleted
2022/10/24 11:30:12 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-openshift-machine-api-gcp deleted
2022/10/24 11:30:13 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-openshift-ingress-gcp deleted
2022/10/24 11:30:15 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-openshift-gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator deleted
2022/10/24 11:30:16 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-openshift-ingress-gcp deleted
2022/10/24 11:30:17 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-openshift-image-registry-gcs deleted
2022/10/24 11:30:19 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-cloud-credential-operator-gcp-ro-creds deleted
2022/10/24 11:30:20 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-openshift-gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator deleted
2022/10/24 11:30:21 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-openshift-gcp-ccm deleted
2022/10/24 11:30:22 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-cloud-credential-operator-gcp-ro-creds deleted
2022/10/24 11:30:24 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-openshift-machine-api-gcp deleted
2022/10/24 11:30:25 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-openshift-cloud-network-config-controller-gcp deleted
2022/10/24 11:30:25 Workload identity pool abutcher-gcp deleted

• https://github.com/openshift/cloud-credential-operator/pull/506

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4311. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4305. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Please add an option to DISABLE debug in ironic-api. Presently it is enabled by default and there is no way to disable it or reduce log level

https://github.com/metal3-io/ironic-image/blob/main/ironic-config/ironic.conf.j2#L3

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): none

How reproducible: Every time

Steps to Reproduce:

Please check source code here: https://github.com/metal3-io/ironic-image/blob/main/ironic-config/ironic.conf.j2#L3

It is enabled by default and there is no way to disable it or reduce log level

Actual results:

Please check Case: 03371411, the log file grew to 409 GB

Expected results: Need a way to disable debug

Additional info: Case 03371411. A cluster must gather and log file can be found in the case.

• https://github.com/openshift/ironic-image/pull/328

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6668

Description of problem:

During restart egress firewall acls will be deleted and re-created from scratch, meaning that egress firewall rules won't be applied for some time during restart

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1560

plus smaller fixes
this is a backport of https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/pull/263

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/pull/290

This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2034883](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034883). The following is the description of the original bug:
—
Description of problem:

Situation (starting point):

• There is an ongoing change to the machine-config-daemon daemonset being applied by the machine-config-operator pod. It is waiting for the daemonset to roll out.
• There are some nodes not ready, so daemonset rollout never ends and waiting on that ends in timeout error.

Problem:

• Machine-config-operator pods stops trying to reconcile stuff whenever it finds timeout error in waiting for the machine-config-daemon rollout
• This implies that the `spec.kubeAPIServerServingCAData` field of controllerconfig/machine-config-controller object is not updated when the kube-apiserver-operator updates kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca configmap.
• Without that field updated, a kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca change is never rolled out to the nodes.
• That ultimately leads to cluster-wide unavailability of "oc logs", "oc rsh" etc. commands when the kube-apiserver-operator starts using a client cert signed by the new kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca to access kubelet ports.

Version-Release number of MCO (Machine Config Operator) (if applicable):

4.7.21

Platform (AWS, VSphere, Metal, etc.): (not relevant)

Are you certain that the root cause of the issue being reported is the MCO (Machine Config Operator)?
(Y/N/Not sure): Y

How reproducible:

Always if the said conditions are met.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Have some nodes not ready
2. Force a change that requires machine-config-daemon daemonset rollout (I think that changing proxy settings would work for this)
3. Wait until a new kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca is rolled out by kube-apiserver-operator

Actual results:

New kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca not forwarded to controllerconfig, kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca not deployed on nodes

Expected results:

kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca forwarded to controllerconfig, kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca deployed to nodes.

Additional info:

In comments

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3421

Description of problem:

[OVN][OSP] After reboot egress node, egress IP cannot be applied anymore.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-11-07-181244

How reproducible:

Frequently happened in automation. But didn't reproduce it in manual.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Label one node as egress node

2.
Config one egressIP object
STEP: Check  one EgressIP assigned in the object.

Nov  8 15:28:23.591: INFO: egressIPStatus: [{"egressIP":"192.168.54.72","node":"huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q"}]

3.
Reboot the node, wait for the node ready.

Actual results:

EgressIP cannot be applied anymore. Waited more than 1 hour.
 oc get egressip
NAME             EGRESSIPS       ASSIGNED NODE   ASSIGNED EGRESSIPS
egressip-47031   192.168.54.72    

Expected results:

The egressIP should be applied correctly.

Additional info:

Some logs
E1108 07:29:41.849149       1 egressip.go:1635] No assignable nodes found for EgressIP: egressip-47031 and requested IPs: [192.168.54.72]
I1108 07:29:41.849288       1 event.go:285] Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"EgressIP", Namespace:"", Name:"egressip-47031", UID:"", APIVersion:"", ResourceVersion:"", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning' reason: 'NoMatchingNodeFound' no assignable nodes for EgressIP: egressip-47031, please tag at least one node with label: k8s.ovn.org/egress-assignable


W1108 07:33:37.401149       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:162] Could not connect to huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q (10.131.0.2:9107): context deadline exceeded
I1108 07:33:37.401348       1 master.go:1364] Adding or Updating Node "huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q"
I1108 07:33:37.437465       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q (10.131.0.2:9107)

After this log, seems like no logs related to "192.168.54.72" happened.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1445

The relevant code in ironic-image was not updated to support TLS, so it still uses the old port and explicit http://

• https://github.com/openshift/ironic-image/pull/295

During initial backporting, due to a number of other colliding commits in upstream, the cobra commands facilitating caching did not get downstreamed. 

This is to downstream those two lines.

• https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/pull/382

clone of 4.12 bug https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGSM-47294

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3292

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-676. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
the machine approver isn't recognizing hostnames that use capital letters as valid even though DNS is case-insensitive

an example of this is in OHSS-14709:

I0822 19:04:51.587266       1 controller.go:114] Reconciling CSR: csr-vdtpv
I0822 19:04:51.600941       1 csr_check.go:156] csr-vdtpv: CSR does not appear to be client csr
I0822 19:04:51.603648       1 csr_check.go:542] retrieving serving cert from ip-100-66-119-117.ec2.internal (100.66.119.117:10250)
I0822 19:04:51.604003       1 csr_check.go:181] Failed to retrieve current serving cert: dial tcp 100.66.119.117:10250: connect: connection refused
I0822 19:04:51.604017       1 csr_check.go:201] Falling back to machine-api authorization for ip-100-66-119-117.ec2.internal
E0822 19:04:51.604024       1 csr_check.go:392] csr-vdtpv: DNS name 'ip-100-66-119-117.tech-ace-maint-prd.aws.delta.com' not in machine names: ip-100-66-119-117.ec2.internal ip-100-66-119-117.ec2.internal ip-100-66-119-117.tech-ACE-maint-prd.aws.delta.com
I0822 19:04:51.604033       1 csr_check.go:204] Could not use Machine for serving cert authorization: DNS name 'ip-100-66-119-117.tech-ace-maint-prd.aws.delta.com' not in machine names: ip-100-66-119-117.ec2.internal ip-100-66-119-117.ec2.internal ip-100-66-119-117.tech-ACE-maint-prd.aws.delta.com
I0822 19:04:51.606777       1 controller.go:199] csr-vdtpv: CSR not authorized

This can be worked around by manually approving the CSR

The relevant line in the machine approver appears to be here: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-machine-approver/blob/master/pkg/controller/csr_check.go#L378

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-machine-approver/pull/181

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-262. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
github rate limit failures for upi image downloading govc.

https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=build+error%3A+error+building+at+STEP+%22RUN+curl+-L+-o&maxAge=48h&context=1&type=all&name=&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6246

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-675. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

A cluster hit a panic in etcd operator in bootstrap:
I0829 14:46:02.736582 1 controller_manager.go:54] StaticPodStateController controller terminated
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x0 pc=0x1e940ab]

goroutine 2701 [running]:
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli.checkSingleMemberHealth({0x29374c0, 0xc00217d920}, 0xc0021fb110)
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli/health.go:135 +0x34b
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli.getMemberHealth.func1()
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli/health.go:58 +0x7f
created by github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli.getMemberHealth
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli/health.go:54 +0x2ac
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Pulled up a 4.12 cluster and hit panic during bootstrap

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

panic as above

Expected results:

no panic

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/924

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7409. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7374. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Originally reported by lance5890 in issue https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/issues/1000

The controllers sometimes get stuck on listing members in failure scenarios, this is known and can be mitigated by simply restarting the CEO. 

similar BZ 2093819 with stuck controllers was fixed slightly different in https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/commit/4816fab709e11e0681b760003be3f1de12c9c103

This fix was contributed by lance5890, thanks a lot!

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/1007

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-8044. The following is the description of the original issue:
—

Description of problem:

rhbz#2089199, backported to 4.11.5, shifted the etcd Grafana dashboard from the monitoring operator to the etcd operator. During the shift, the ConfigMap was renamed from grafana-dashboard-etcd to etcd-dashboard. However, we did not include logic for garbage-collecting the obsolete dasboard, so clusters that update from 4.11.1 and similar into 4.11.>=5 or 4.12+ currently end up with both the obsolete and new ConfigMaps. We should grow code to remove the obsolete ConfigMap.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.>=5 and 4.12+ are currently exposed.

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install 4.11.1.
2. Update to a release that defines the etcd-dashboard ConfigMap.
3. Check for etcd dashboards with oc -n openshift-config-managed get configmaps | grep etcd.

Actual results:

Both etcd-dashboard and grafana-dashboard-etcd exist:

$ oc -n openshift-config-managed get configmaps | grep etcd
etcd-dashboard                                        1      196d
grafana-dashboard-etcd                                1      2y282d

Another example is 4.11.1 to 4.11.5 CI:

$ curl -s https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-origin-installer-e2e-aws-upgrade/1570415394001260544/artifacts/e2e-aws-upgrade/configmaps.json | jq -r '.items[].metadata | select(.namespace == "openshift-config-managed" and (.name | contains("etcd"))) | .name'
etcd-dashboard
grafana-dashboard-etcd

Expected results:

Only etcd-dashboard still exists.

Additional info:

A new manifest for the outgoing ConfigMap that sets the release.openshift.io/delete: "true" annotation would ask the cluster-version operator to reap the obsolete ConfigMap.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/1022

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1549. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

The cluster-dns-operator does not reconcile the openshift-dns namespace, which has been exposed as an issue in 4.12 due to the requirement for the namespace to have pod-security labels.

If a cluster has been incrementally updated from a version less than or equal to 4.9, the openshift-dns namespace will most likely not contain the required pod-security labels since the namespace was statically created when the cluster was installed with old namespace configuration.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always if cluster originally installed with v4.9 or less

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install v4.9
2. Upgrade to v4.12 (incrementally if required for upgrade path)
3. openshift-dns namespace will be missing pod-security labels

Actual results:

"oc get ns openshift-dns -o yaml" will show missing pod-security labels: 

apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
  annotations:
    openshift.io/node-selector: ""
    openshift.io/sa.scc.mcs: s0:c15,c0
    openshift.io/sa.scc.supplemental-groups: 1000210000/10000
    openshift.io/sa.scc.uid-range: 1000210000/10000
  creationTimestamp: "2020-05-21T19:36:15Z"
  labels:
    kubernetes.io/metadata.name: openshift-dns
    olm.operatorgroup.uid/3d42c0c1-01cd-4c55-bf88-864f041c7e7a: ""
    openshift.io/cluster-monitoring: "true"
    openshift.io/run-level: "0"
  name: openshift-dns
  resourceVersion: "3127555382"
  uid: 0fb4571e-952f-4bea-bc45-461beec54369
spec:
  finalizers:
  - kubernetes

Expected results:

pod-security labels should exist:
 
 labels:
    kubernetes.io/metadata.name: openshift-dns
    olm.operatorgroup.uid/3d42c0c1-01cd-4c55-bf88-864f041c7e7a: ""
    openshift.io/cluster-monitoring: "true"
    openshift.io/run-level: "0"
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit: privileged
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce: privileged
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn: privileged

Additional info:

Issue found in CI during upgrade

https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C03G7REB4JV/p1663676443155839 

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-dns-operator/pull/346

Description of problem:
Switching the spec.endpointPublishingStrategy.loadBalancer.scope of the default ingresscontroller results in a degraded ingress operator. The routes using that endpoint like the console URL become inaccessible.
Degraded operators after scope change:

$ oc get co | grep -v ' True        False         False'
NAME                                       VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
authentication                             4.11.4    False       False         True       72m     OAuthServerRouteEndpointAccessibleControllerAvailable: Get "https://oauth-openshift.apps.kartrosa.ukld.s1.devshift.org/healthz": EOF
console                                    4.11.4    False       False         False      72m     RouteHealthAvailable: failed to GET route (https://console-openshift-console.apps.kartrosa.ukld.s1.devshift.org): Get "https://console-openshift-console.apps.kartrosa.ukld.s1.devshift.org": EOF
ingress                                    4.11.4    True        False         True       65m     The "default" ingress controller reports Degraded=True: DegradedConditions: One or more other status conditions indicate a degraded state: CanaryChecksSucceeding=False (CanaryChecksRepetitiveFailures: Canary route checks for the default ingress controller are failing)

We have noticed that each time this happens the underlying AWS loadbalancer gets recreated which is as expected however the router pods probably do not get notified about the new loadbalancer. The instances in the new loadbalancer become 'outOfService'.

Restarting one of the router pods fixes the issue and brings back a couple of instances under the loadbalancer back to 'InService' which leads to the operators becoming happy again.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

ingress in 4.11.z however we suspect this issue to also apply to older versions

How reproducible:

Consistently reproducible

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a test OCP 4.11 cluster in AWS
2. Switch the spec.endpointPublishingStrategy.loadBalancer.scope of the default ingresscontroller in openshift-ingress-operator to Internal from External (or vice versa)
3. New Loadbalancer is created in AWS for the default router service, however the instances behind are not in service

Actual results:

ingress, authentication and console operators go into a degraded state. Console URL of the cluster is inaccessible

Expected results:

The ingresscontroller scope transition from internal->External (or vice versa) is smooth without any downtime or operators going into degraded state. The console is accessible.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1389

Following the trail
https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver/issues/1139
https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver/pull/1175
https://github.com/openshift/aws-ebs-csi-driver/pull/206
 
Looks like the fix should be in 4.12, but it still see it being 39 vs ~24 on an m6i instance type.

It seems that the kubelet applies this capacity to the node in 4.11 and earlier and, thus, unlikely to receive this fix for attachable volumes in the upstream CSI driver. 4.12 behavior is currently unknown but it seems that the kubelet might still be setting this capacity.

The actual issue is that kube scheduler schedules pods that require PVs to nodes where those PVs can not be attached.

• https://github.com/openshift/aws-ebs-csi-driver/pull/213

Description of problem:

We observed that a dual stack cluster deployed with AI gui only fails.
This cluster is dhcp for ipv4, RA/RS autoconfiguration for ipv6.

It fails with error in the onvkube container

```
I0906 07:45:43.044090   87450 gateway_init.go:261] Initializing Gateway Functionality
I0906 07:45:43.046398   87450 gateway_localnet.go:152] Node local addresses initialized to: map[10.131.31.214:{10.131.31.208 fffffff0} 10.255.0.2:{10.255.0.0 fffffe00} 127.0.0.1:{127.0.0.0 ff000000} 2001:1b74:480:613a:f6e9:d4ff:fef1:6f26:{2001:1b74:480:613a:: ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000} ::1:{::1 ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff} fd01:0:0:1::2:{fd01:0:0:1:: ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000} fe80::8ce9:b4ff:fe1a:1208:{fe80:: ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000} fe80::c8ef:ecff:fee3:64c7:{fe80:: ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000} fe80::f6e9:d4ff:fef1:6f26:{fe80:: ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000}]
I0906 07:45:43.047759   87450 helper_linux.go:71] Provided gateway interface "br-ex", found as index: 7
I0906 07:45:43.048045   87450 helper_linux.go:97] Found default gateway interface br-ex 10.131.31.209
I0906 07:45:43.048152   87450 helper_linux.go:71] Provided gateway interface "br-ex", found as index: 7
F0906 07:45:43.048318   87450 ovnkube.go:133] failed to get default gateway interface
```

on the node we observed that there is multi-path entry during

```
default proto ra metric 48 pref medium
        nexthop via fe80::e2f6:2d01:ab14:ec71 dev br-ex weight 1
        nexthop via fe80::e2f6:2d01:ab11:c271 dev br-ex weight 1
```

I manually remove one of the entries (`ip route delete`) and then delete the ovnkube-node pod. Then the installation continues, container works.

Every time there is multiple entry, if the onvkube-node starts, it fails.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.30

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

There might a side issue: the interface of the node upon boot takes time to get the ipv6 autoconfiguration, no RS packets seemed to be sent out (observed zero on all routers).

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1296

Description of problem:

Currently when installing Openshift on the Openstack cluster name length limit is allowed to  14 characters.
Customer wants to know if is it possible to override this validation when installing Openshift on Openstack and create a cluster name that is greater than 14 characters.

Version : OCP 4.8.5 UPI Disconnected 
Environment : Openstack 16 

Issue:
User reports that they are getting error for OCP cluster in Openstack UPI, where the name of the cluster is > 14 characters.

Error events :
~~~
fatal: [localhost]: FAILED! => {"changed": true, "cmd": ["/usr/local/bin/openshift-install", "create", "manifests", "--dir=/home/gitlab-runner/builds/WK8mkokN/0/CPE/SKS/pipelines/non-prod/ocp4-openstack-build/ocpinstaller/install-upi"], "delta": "0:00:00.311397", "end": "2022-09-03 21:38:41.974608", "msg": "non-zero return code", "rc": 1, "start": "2022-09-03 21:38:41.663211", "stderr": "level=fatal msg=failed to fetch Master Machines: failed to load asset \"Install Config\": invalid \"install-config.yaml\" file: metadata.name: Invalid value: \"sks-osp-inf-cpe-1-cbr1a\": cluster name is too long, please restrict it to 14 characters", "stderr_lines": ["level=fatal msg=failed to fetch Master Machines: failed to load asset \"Install Config\": invalid \"install-config.yaml\" file: metadata.name: Invalid value: \"sks-osp-inf-cpe-1-cbr1a\": cluster name is too long, please restrict it to 14 characters"], "stdout": "", "stdout_lines": []}
~~~

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

Actual results:

Users are getting error "cluster name is too long" when clustername contains more than 14 characters for OCP on Openstack

Expected results:

The 14 characters limit should be change for the OCP clustername on Openstack

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6355

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2495. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Failures like:

$ oc login --token=...

Logged into "https://api..." as "..." using the token provided.

Error from server (Timeout): the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get projects.project.openshift.io)

break login, which tries to gather information before saving the configuration, including a giant project list.

Ideally login would be able to save the successful login credentials, even when the informative gathering had difficulties. And possibly the informative gathering could be made conditional (--quiet or similar?) so expensive gathering could be skipped in use-cases where the context was not needed.

• https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/1274

• https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/pull/413

Description of problem:

With every pod update we are executing a mutate operation to add the pod port to the port group or add the pod IP to an address set. This functionally doesn't hurt, since mutate will not add duplicate values to the same set. However, this is bad for performance. For example, with a 730 network policies affecting a pod, and issuing 7 pod updates would result in over 5k transactions.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1447

Description of problem:

Pipeline list page fetches all the pipelineruns to find the last pipeline run and which results in more load time. This performance issue needs to be addressed in all the pieplines list pages wherever applicable.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.9

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create 10+ pipelines in a namespace
2. Create more number of pipelineruns under each pipeline
3. navigate to piplines list page.

Actual results:
Pipelines list will take a long time to load the list.

Expected results:

Pipeline list should not take more time to load the list.

Additional info:

Reduce the amount to data fetched to find the last pipelinerun, maybe use PartialMetadata to find the latest pipeline run and to improve the performance.

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12144

Description of problem:
-----------------------
On dualstack baremetal IPI cluster next error message is present in ovnkube logs:

oc logs -n openshift-ovn-kubernetes ovnkube-node-rvggh -c ovnkube-node
...

E0810 02:12:46.343460 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:13:16.347603 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:13:46.351108 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:14:16.355047 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:14:46.358950 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
I0810 02:15:13.313945 353971 reflector.go:535] k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:134: Watch close - *v1.Service total 9 items received
E0810 02:15:16.362737 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:15:46.366490 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:16:16.369963 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
I0810 02:16:24.306561 353971 reflector.go:535] k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:134: Watch close - *v1.Endpoints total 560 items received
E0810 02:16:46.373482 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:17:16.377497 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:17:46.380726 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
I0810 02:18:15.325871 353971 reflector.go:535] k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:134: Watch close - *v1.Node total 50 items received
E0810 02:18:16.384732 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
I0810 02:18:38.299738 353971 reflector.go:535] k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:134: Watch close - *v1.Pod total 9 items received
E0810 02:18:46.388162 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:19:16.391669 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
-------------------------------------------------------------
OCP-4.10.26

ovn-2021-21.12.0-58.el8fdp.x86_64
ovn-2021-host-21.12.0-58.el8fdp.x86_64
ovn-2021-central-21.12.0-58.el8fdp.x86_64
ovn-2021-vtep-21.12.0-58.el8fdp.x86_64

How reproducible:
-----------------
so far spotted on 2 different clusters

Steps to Reproduce:
-------------------
1. Deploy dualstack baremetal IPI cluster with OVNKubernetesHybrid network(add next to cluster's config before running cluster install):

defaultNetwork:
type: OVNKubernetes
ovnKubernetesConfig:
hybridOverlayConfig:
hybridClusterNetwork: []

Actual results:
---------------
Error message in logs

Expected results:
-----------------
No error message in logs

Additional info:
----------------
Baremetal dualstack setup with 3 masters and 4 workers, bonding configured for baremetal network on masters and workers

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1350

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4250. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Added a script to collect PodNetworkConnectivityChecks to able to view the overall status of the pod network connectivity.

Current must-gather collects the contents of `openshift-network-diagnostics` but does not collect the PodNetworkConnectivityCheck.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12, 4.11, 4.10

• https://github.com/openshift/must-gather/pull/338

• https://github.com/openshift/etcd/pull/170

Description of problem: 

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-baremetal-installer.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.11

Additional info: This issue is needed for the bot-created PR to merge after the 4.11 GA.

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/5897

Origin tests for the bond-cni

Backport of https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/27405

• https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/27554

Tracker bug for bootimage bump in 4.11. This bug should block bugs which need a bootimage bump to fix.

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6459

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-884. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Since the decomissioning of the psi cluster, and subsequent move of the rhcos release browser, product builds machine-os-images builds have been failing. See e.g. https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/taskinfo?taskID=47565717

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12, 4.11, 4.10.

How reproducible:

Have ART build the image

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Have ART build the image

Actual results:

Build failure

Expected results:

Build succesful

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-os-images/pull/22

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1543

This was originally reported in BZ as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046335

—

Description of problem:

The issue reported here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954121 still occur (tested on OCP 4.8.11, the CU also verified that the issue can happen even with OpenShift 4.7.30, 4.8.17 and 4.9.11)

How reproducible:

Attach a NIC to a master node will trigger the issue

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Deploy an OCP cluster (I've tested it IPI on AWS)
2. Attach a second NIC to a running master node (in my case "ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal")

Actual results:

~~~
$ oc get node ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal -o json | jq ".status.addresses"
[

,

,

,

]

$ oc get co etcd
NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING DEGRADED SINCE
etcd 4.8.11 True False True 31h

$ oc get co etcd -o json | jq ".status.conditions[0]"

~~~

Expected results:

To have the certificate valid also for the second IP (the newly created one "10.0.187.247")

Additional info:

Deleting the following secrets seems to solve the issue:
~~~
$ oc get secret n openshift-etcd | grep kubernetes.io/tls | grep ^etcd
etcd-client kubernetes.io/tls 2 61s
etcd-peer-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 61s
etcd-peer-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 61s
etcd-peer-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 60s
etcd-serving-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 60s
etcd-serving-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 59s
etcd-serving-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 59s
etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 58s
etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 59s
etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 58s

$ oc get secret n openshift-etcd | grep kubernetes.io/tls | grep ^etcd | awk '

' | xargs -I {} oc delete secret {} -n openshift-etcd
secret "etcd-client" deleted
secret "etcd-peer-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-peer-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-peer-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted

$ oc get co etcd -o json | jq ".status.conditions[0]"

~~~

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/931