Problem:

Certain Insights Advisor features differentiate between RHEL and OCP advisor

Goal:

Address top priority UI misalignments between RHEL and OCP advisor. Address UI features dropped from Insights ADvisor for OCP GA.

Scope:

Specific tasks and priority of them tracked in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CCXDEV-7432

Managing PVs at scale for a fleet creates difficulties where "one size does not fit all". The ability for SRE to deploy prometheus with PVs and have retention based an on a desired size would enable easier management of these volumes across the fleet. 

The prometheus-operator exposes retentionSize.

This is a feature request to enable this configuration option via CMO cluster-monitoring-config ConfigMap.

cc Simon Pasquier  

Problem Alignment

The Problem

Today, all configuration for setting individual, for example, routing configuration is done via a single configuration file that only admins have access to. If an environment uses multiple tenants and each tenant, for example, has different systems that they are using to notify teams in case of an issue, then someone needs to file a request w/ an admin to add the required settings.

That can be bothersome for individual teams, since requests like that usually disappear in the backlog of an administrator. At the same time, administrators might get tons of requests that they have to look at and prioritize, which takes them away from more crucial work.

We would like to introduce a more self service approach whereas individual teams can create their own configuration for their needs w/o the administrators involvement.

Last but not least, since Monitoring is deployed as a Core service of OpenShift there are multiple restrictions that the SRE team has to apply to all OSD and ROSA clusters. One restriction is the ability for customers to use the central Alertmanager that is owned and managed by the SRE team. They can't give access to the central managed secret due to security concerns so that users can add their own routing information.

High-Level Approach

Provide a new API (based on the Operator CRD approach) as part of the Prometheus Operator that allows creating a subset of the Alertmanager configuration without touching the central Alertmanager configuration file.

Please note that we do not plan to support additional individual webhooks with this work. Customers will need to deploy their own version of the third party webhooks.

Goal & Success

• Allow users to deploy individual configurations that allow setting up Alertmanager for their needs without an administrator.

Solution Alignment

Key Capabilities

• As an OpenShift administrator, I want to control who can CRUD individual configuration so that I can make sure that any unknown third person can touch the central Alertmanager instance shipped within OpenShift Monitoring.
• As a team owner, I want to deploy a routing configuration to push notifications for alerts to my system of choice.

Key Flows

Team A wants to send all their important notifications to a specific Slack channel.

• Administrator gives permission to Team A to allow creating a new configuration CR in their individual namespace.
• Team A creates a new configuration CR.
• Team A configures what alerts should go into their Slack channel.
• Open Questions & Key Decisions (optional)
• Do we want to improve anything inside the developer console to allow configuration?

Copy/paste from [_https://github.com/openshift-cs/managed-openshift/issues/60_]

Which service is this feature request for?
OpenShift Dedicated and Red Hat OpenShift Service on AWS

What are you trying to do?
Allow ROSA/OSD to integrate with AWS Managed Prometheus.

Describe the solution you'd like
Remote-write of metrics is supported in OpenShift but it does not work with AWS Managed Prometheus since AWS Managed Prometheus requires AWS SigV4 auth.

• Note that Prometheus supports AWS SigV4 since v2.26 and OpenShift 4.9 uses v2.29.

Describe alternatives you've considered
There is the workaround to use the "AWS SigV4 Proxy" but I'd think this is not properly supported by RH.
https://mobb.ninja/docs/rosa/cluster-metrics-to-aws-prometheus/

Additional context
The customer wants to use an open and portable solution to centralize metrics storage and analysis. If they also deploy to other clouds, they don't want to have to re-configure. Since most clouds offer a Prometheus service (or it's easy to self-manage Prometheus), app migration should be simplified.

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.

Feature Overview.

Early customer feedback is that they see SNO as a great solution covering smaller footprint deployment, but are wondering what is the evolution story OpenShift is going to provide where more capacity or high availability are needed in the future.

While migration tooling (moving workload/config to new cluster) could be a mid-term solution, customer desire is not to include extra hardware to be involved in this process.

 For Telecommunications Providers, at the Far Edge they intend to start small and then grow. Many of these operators will start with a SNO-based DU deployment as an initial investment, but as DUs evolve, different segments of the radio spectrum are added, various radio hardware is provisioned and features delivered to the Far Edge, the Telecommunication Providers desire the ability for their Far Edge deployments to scale up from 1 node to 2 nodes to n nodes. On the opposite side of the spectrum from SNO is MMIMO where there is a robust cluster and workloads use HPA.

Goals

• Provide the capability to expand a single replica control plane topology to host more workloads capacity - add worker
• Provide the capability to expand a single replica control plane to be a highly available control plane
• To satisfy MMIMO Telecommunications providers will want the ability to scale a SNO to a multi-node cluster that can support HPA.
• Telecommunications providers do not want workload (DU specifically) downtime when migrating from SNO to a multi-node cluster.
• Telecommunications providers wish to be able to scale from one to two or more nodes to support a variety of radio hardware.
• Support CP scaling (CP HA) for 2 node cluster, 3 node cluster and n node cluster. As the number of nodes in the cluster increases so does the failure domain of the cluster. The cluster is now supporting more cell sectors and therefore has more of a need for HA and resiliency including the cluster CP.

Requirements

• TBD

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section:

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Feature Overview

The AWS-specific code added in OCPPLAN-6006 needs to become GA and with this we want to introduce a couple of Day2 improvements.
Currently the AWS tags are defined and applied at installation time only and saved in the infrastructure CRD's status field for further operator use, which in turn just add the tags during creation.

Saving in the status field means it's not included in Velero backups, which is a crucial feature for customers and Day2.
Thus the status.resourceTags field should be deprecated in favour of a newly created spec.resourceTags with the same content. The installer should only populate the spec, consumers of the infrastructure CRD must favour the spec over the status definition if both are supplied, otherwise the status should be honored and a warning shall be issued.

Being part of the spec, the behaviour should also tag existing resources that do not have the tags yet and once the tags in the infrastructure CRD are changed all the AWS resources should be updated accordingly.

On AWS this can be done without re-creating any resources (the behaviour is basically an upsert by tag key) and is possible without service interruption as it is a metadata operation.

Tag deletes continue to be out of scope, as the customer can still have custom tags applied to the resources that we do not want to delete.

Due to the ongoing intree/out of tree split on the cloud and CSI providers, this should not apply to clusters with intree providers (!= "external").

Once confident we have all components updated, we should introduce an end2end test that makes sure we never create resources that are untagged.

After that, we can remove the experimental flag and make this a GA feature.

Goals

• Inclusion in the cluster backups
• Flexibility of changing tags during cluster lifetime, without recreating the whole cluster

Requirements

• This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

List any affected packages or components.

• Installer
• Cluster Infrastructure
• Storage
• Node
• NetworkEdge
• Internal Registry
• CCO

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

• Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
• Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

• Core Networking Stability
• Core Networking Performance and Scale
• Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
• Core Networking UX (Observability)
• Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

• Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
• SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
• Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

• CNV
• Service Mesh
• CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.

Relevant links:

• Documentation:
  • Edge Diagnostics Scratchpad, our team's internal diagnostic guide.
  • Troubleshooting OCP networking issues - The complete guide, the SDN team's diagnostic guide.
  • Linux Performance, Brendan Gregg's guide to analyzing Linux performance issues.
  • RFC: A proper feedback loop on Alerts.
  • OpenShift Router Reload Technical Overview on Access.
  • Performance Scaling HAProxy with OpenShift on Access.
  • How to collect worker metrics to troubleshoot CPU load, memory pressure and interrupt issues and networking on worker nodes in OCP 4 on Access.
  • OpenShift Performance and Scale Knowledge Base on Mojo, results from OpenShift scalability testing.
  • Scalability and performance, OCP 4.5 documentation about the router's currently known scalability limits.
  • Scaling OpenShift Container Platform HAProxy Router, OCP 3.11 documentation about the manual performance configuration that was possible in OCP 3.
  • Timing web requests with cURL and Chrome from the Cloudflare blog.
  • tcpdump advanced filters, some useful tcpdump commands.
  • OpenShift SDN - Networking, OCP 3.11 documentation on the SDN (useful background reading).
  • Ingress Operator and Controller Status Conditions, design document for improved status condition reporting.
  • Observability tips for HAProxy, a slide deck by Willy Tarreau.
  • Interesting Traces - Out of Order versus Retransmissions, analysis using tshark.
  • The PCP Book: A Complete Documentation of Performance Co-Pilot, by Yogesh Babar.
  • Debugging kernel networking bug, brief guide to using SystemTap on RHCOS.
  • Troubleshooting throughput issues from the OCP 4.5 documentation.
  • Troubleshooting OpenShift Clusters and Workloads.
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux Network Performance Tuning Guide (PDF).
  • openshift/enhancements#289 stability: point to point network check, a diagnostic built into the kube-apiserver operator.
• Diagnostic tools:
  • dropwatch to watch for packet drops.
  • ethtool to check NIC configuration.
  • iovisor/bcc: BCC - Tools for BPF-based Linux IO analysis, networking, monitoring, and more to trace and diagnose various issues in the networking stack.
  • r-curler to gather timing information about HTTP/HTTPS connections.
  • route-monitor, to monitor routes for reachability.
  • hping(3), a programmable packet generator.
  • OpenTracing / Jaeger in OpenShift.
  • node-problem-detector, a possible integration point for new diagnostics.
  • Using SystemTap by Brendan Gregg.
  • DTrace SystemTap cheatsheet (PDF).
• Visualization and more sophisticated diagnostic tools:
  • eldadru/ksniff, kubectl plugin for tcpdump & Wireshark.
  • ironcladlou/ditm, Dan's "Dan in the Middle" tool.
  • Skydive, network diagnostic and visualization tool.
  • ali, a "load testing tool capable of performing real-time analysis" with visualization.
• Testing tools:
  • stress-ng, a general stress-loading tool (CPU, filesystem, network, ...).
  • mb, the networking benchmarking tool written and used by Jiri Mencak from our Perf+Scale team.
• Case studies:
  • BZ1763206 is an example of diagnosing DNS latency/timeouts.
  • BZ1829779 Investigation details the diagnosis of route latency.
  • BZ1845545 is an example of diagnosing misconfigured DNS for an external LB.
  • Debugging network stalls on Kubernetes, from the GitHub Blog, about diagnosing Kubernetes performance issues related to ksoftirqd.

Feature Overview

• This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary

• Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

Goals

• This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature

• …

Requirements

• This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories

• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories

• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?

• Does this feature have doc impact?  

• New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact

• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.

• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?

• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?

• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?

• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.

• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Feature Overview

• As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.

• As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

• Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

• Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
• Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
• Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
• Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
• In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
• For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
• Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
• The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
• The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

• As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
• As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
• As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
• As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
• As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

• As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
• As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

• This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

References

• Bootable Ephemeral Installer Image for Disconnected Cluster 0 Deployments

Feature Overview

Customers are asking for improvements to the upgrade experience (both over-the-air and disconnected). This is a feature tracking epics required to get that work done.  

Goals

1. Have an option to do upgrades in more discrete steps under admin control. Specifically, these steps are: 
   • Control plane upgrade
   • Worker nodes upgrade
   • Workload enabling upgrade (i..e. Router, other components) or infra nodes
2. Better visibility into any errors during the upgrades and documentation of what they error means and how to recover. 
3. An user experience around an end-2-end back-up and restore after a failed upgrade 
4. OTA-810  - Better Documentation: 
   • Backup procedures before upgrades. 
   • More control over worker upgrades (with tagged pools between user Vs admin)
   • The kinds of pre-upgrade tests that are run, the errors that are flagged and what they mean and how to address them. 
   • Better explanation of each discrete step in upgrades, and what each CVO Operator is doing and potential errors, troubleshooting and mitigating actions.

References

• OpenShift Upgrades Customer Issues Discussion -6/22/2023
• Select Customer Experiences and Feedback on Upgrades

Feature Overview

Enable sharing ConfigMap and Secret across namespaces

Requirements

Questions to answer…

NA

Out of Scope

NA

Background, and strategic fit

Consumption of RHEL entitlements has been a challenge on OCP 4 since it moved to a cluster-based entitlement model compared to the node-based (RHEL subscription manager) entitlement mode. In order to provide a sufficiently similar experience to OCP 3, the entitlement certificates that are made available on the cluster (OCPBU-93) should be shared across namespaces in order to prevent the need for cluster admin to copy these entitlements in each namespace which leads to additional operational challenges for updating and refreshing them. 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:
 * What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
 * Does this feature have doc impact?
 * New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
 * If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
 * What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
 * How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
 * What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
 * Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
 * What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.
<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Feature --->
<--- Remove the descriptive text as appropriate --->

Feature Overview

• As RH OpenShift Product Owners, we want to enable new providers/platforms/service with varying levels of capabilities and integration with minimal reliance on OpenShift Engineering.
• As a new provider/platform partner, I want to enable my solution (hardware and/or software) with OpenShift with minimal effort.

Problem

• It is currently challenging for us to enable new platforms / providers without taking the heavy burden on doing the platform specific development ourselves.

Goals

• We want to enable the long-tail new platforms/providers to expand our reach into new markets and/or support new use cases.
• We want to remove strict dependencies we have on Engineering teams to review, support and test new providers.
• We want to lower the effort required for onboarding new platforms/providers.
• We want to enable new platform/providers to self-certify.
• We want to define tiered model for provider/platform integration that delineates ownership and responsibilities throughout new provider/platform development lifecycle and support model.
• We want to reduce time to onboard new provider/platform – ideally to a single release.
• We want to maintain consistent customer experience across all providers/platforms.

Requirements

• Step-by-step guide on how to add a new platform/provider for each tier
• Certification tool for partner to self-certify
• Certification tool results for (at least) each Y/minor release submitted by partner to Red Hat for acknowledgement
• DCI program to enable partners to run CI with OpenShift on their platform
• Well documented, accessible, and up-to-date test suites for providing the test coverage of the partner
• CI includes upgrade testing of OpenShift with partner's components
• Partner component upgrade failure should not block OpenShift upgrade
• Partner code is available in repositories in the openshift org on github with an open source license compatible with OpenShift

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section:

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

References

• [ Notes - OpenShift Everywhere - Onboarding new providers/platforms|https://www.google.com/url?q=[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M1zLG2-wmkeCWTS8omN5G8vsDKvDeZfmegsi7cCVh-U/edit?usp%3Dsharing&sa=D&source=calendar&ust=1641920246517943&usg=AOvVaw2ZIl_XuE7OsSr4wCmRjOp3]] 
• OKD Installer Architecture Brainstorming Working Group Meeting Minutes
• New-Platform Documentation Working Group Meeting Minutes

Goal

Increase integration of Shipwright, Tekton, Argo CD in OpenShift GitOps with OpenShift platform and related products such as ACM.

Summary (PM+lead)

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AUTH-2 revealed that, in prinicipal, Pod Security Admission is possible to integrate into OpenShift while retaining SCC functionality.

This epic is about the concrete steps to enable Pod Security Admission by default in OpenShift

Motivation (PM+lead)

Goals (lead)

• Enable Pod Security Admission in "restricted" policy level by default
• Migrate existing core workloads to comply to the "restricted" pod security policy level

Non-Goals (lead)

• Other OpenShift workloads must be migrated by the individual responsible teams.

Deliverables

Proposal (lead)

Enhancement - https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1010

User Stories (PM)

Dependencies (internal and external, lead)

Previous Work (lead)

Open questions (lead)

1. ...

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-authentication-operator/pull/570
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator/pull/120
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-samples-operator/pull/425

Epic Goal

HyperShift provisions OpenShift clusters with externally managed control-planes. It follows a slightly different process for provisioning clusters. For example, HyperShift uses cluster API as a backend and moves all the machine management bits to the management cluster.  

Why is this important?

showing machine management/cluster auto-scaling tabs in the console is likely to confuse users and cause unnecessary side effects. 

Definition of Done

• MachineConfig and MachineConfigPool should not be present, they should be either removed or hidden when the cluster is spawned using HyperShift. 
• Cluster Settings show say the control plane is externally managed and be read-only.
• Cluster Settings -> Configuration resources should be read-only, maybe hide the tab
• Some resources should go in an allowlist. Most will be hidden
• Review getting started steps

See Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k76JtRRHBdCCEjHPqKcYvbNVsuaGmRhWDLESWIm0mbo/edit#

Setup / Testing

It's based on the SERVER_FLAG controlPlaneTopology being set to External is really the driving factor here; this can be done in one of two ways:

• Locally via a Bridge Variable, export BRIDGE_CONTROL_PLANE_TOPOLOGY_MODE="External"
• Locally / OnCluster via modifying the window.SERVER_FLAGS.controlPlaneTopology to External in the dev tools

To test work related to cluster upgrade process, use a 4.10.3 cluster set on the candidate-4.10 upgrade channel using 4.11 frontend code.

Epic Goal

• Ensure that OCP Admin console can enable dark mode
• Mechanism for switching between light/dark mode, based on user preferences or User Settings in OCP
• Identify changes needed for OCP console's dynamic plugins
• Status as we work through the stories: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18ib0A9ZtSYo1e2aOtM2LtZcsNFs1aRCHXx6NAPsIAso/edit#

Why is this important?

• So the UX satisfies the current trands, where dark mode is becoming a standard for modern services.  

Acceptance Criteria

• OCP admin console must be rendered in a preferred mode based on `prefers-color-scheme` media query
• OCP admin console must be rendered in a preferred mode selected in the User Setting page
• Create an followup epic/story for and listing and tracking changes needed in OCP console's dynamic plugins

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. PatternFly - Dark mode PF variables

Previous Work (Optional):

1. Mike Coker has worked on a POC from the PF point of view on both the admin and dev console, and the screenshot results are listed below along with the repo branch. Also listed is a document covering some of the common issues found when putting together the admin console POC. https://github.com/mcoker/console/tree/dark-theme
   Background POC work completed for reference:

PatternFly Dark Theme Handbook: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mRYEfUoOjTsSt7hiqjbeplqhfo3_rVDO0QqMj2p67pw/edit

Admin Console -> Workloads & Pods

• Screenshots: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BoOpXpX96_uNUhVJiEqGUCZ-JMYh1A78fXJhk3H86K8/edit#slide=id.p
• Github branch: https://github.com/mcoker/console/tree/dark-theme
• Github PR for Dark Theme WIP by Vikram: https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/10947{}

Dev Console -> Gotcha pages: Observe Dashboard and Metrics, Add, Pipelines: builder, list, log, and run

• Screenshots: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/13jagAf_JEu82hd_KpEHRmj25xCEqwImWpNufzVopuUs/edit#slide=id.p
• Github branch: https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/10815
• Evaluation: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fBCPPb4Z1sqUDKgQkpueGe8VQZo4pBUA9PV4vnFCnDw/edit#gid=0

Open questions::

1. Who should be responsible for updating DynamicPlugins to be able to render in dark mode?

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

• Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

Goal

• Add the ability for users to select supported but not recommended updates.
• Refine workflow when both "upgradeable=false" and "supported-but-not-recommended" updates occur

Background
RFE: for 4.10, Cincinnati and the cluster-version operator are adding conditional updates (a.k.a. targeted edge blocking): https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OTA-267

High-level plans in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#update-client-support-for-the-enhanced-schema

Example of what the oc adm upgrade UX will be in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#cluster-administrator.

The oc implementation landed via https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/961.

Design

• Use case 01: "supported but not recommended" occurs to the latest version:
  • Add an info icon next to the version on update path with a pop-over to explain about why updating to this version is supported, but not recommended and a link to known risks
  • Identify the difference in "recommended" versions, "supported but not recommended" versions, and "blocked" versions (upgradeable=false) in the + more modal.
  • The latest version is pre-selected in the dropdown in the update modal with an inline alert to inform users about supported-but-not-recommended version with link to known risks. Users can choose to update to another recommended versions, update to a supported-but-not-recommended one, or wait.
  • The "recommended" and "supported but not recommended" updates are separated in the dropdown.
  • If a user selects a "recommended" update, the inline alert disappears.
• Use case 02: When both "upgradeable=false" and "supported but not recommended" occur:
  • Add an alert banner to explain why users shouldn’t update to the latest version and link to how to resolve on the cluster settings details page. Users have the options to resolve the issue, update to a patch version, or wait.
  • If users open the update modal without resolving the "upgradeable=false" issue, the next recommended version is pre-selected. An expandable link "View blocked versions (#)" is included under the dropdown to show "upgradeable=false" versions with resolve link.
  • If users resolve the "upgradeable=false" issue, the cluster settings page will change to use case 01

• • Question: Priority on changing the upgradeable=false alert banner in update modal and blocked versions in dropdown

See design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Nja4whdsI5dKmQNS_rXyN8IGtRXDJ8gXuU_eSxBLMIY/edit#

See marvel: https://marvelapp.com/prototype/h3ehaa4/screen/86077932

Epic Goal

• Add telemetry so that we know how image stream features are used.

Why is this important?

• We have a long standing epic to create image streams v2. We need to better understand how image streams are used today.

Scenarios

1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

1. …

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Epic Goal

• Make the image registry distributed across availability zones.

Why is this important?

• The registry should be highly available and zone failsafe.

Scenarios

1. As an administrator I want to rely on a default configuration that spreads image registry pods across topology zones so that I don't suffer from a long recovery time (>6 mins) in case of a complete zone failure if all pods are impacted.

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Pod's topologySpreadConstraints

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-image-registry-operator/pull/730
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Goal

Remove Jenkins from the OCP Payload.

Problem

• Jenkins images are "non-trival in size, impact experience around OCP payloads
• Security advisories cannot be handled once, but against all actively supported OCP releases, adding to response time for handling said advisories
• Some customers may now want to upgrade Jenkins as OCP upgrades (making this configurable is more ideal)

Why is this important

• This is an engineering motivated item to reduce costs so we have more cycles for strategic work
• Aside from the team itself, top level OCP architects want this to reduce the image size, improve general OCP upgrade experience
• Sends a mix message with respect to what is startegic CI/CI when Jenkins is baked into OCP, but Tekton/Pipelines is an add-on, day 2 install sort of thing

Dependencies (internal and external)

See epic linking - need alternative non payload image available to provide relatively seamless migration

Also, the EP for this is approved and merged at https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/builds/remove-jenkins-payload.md

Estimate (xs, s, m, l, xl, xxl):

Questions:

• in addition to needing the CPaaS Image available first, have we confirmed the "deprecate first, then remove" requirements?  Per grooming we've assigned Rob Gormley the task https://issues.redhat.com/browse/JKNS-274 for tracking this down.  I will be reaching out to Ben Parees (he is currently on vacation) to confirm from an OCP staff engineer / architect perspective if his approval of https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/841 is sufficient signoff from that end.

       PARTIAL ANSWER ^^:  confirmed with Ben Parees in https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C014MHHKUSF/p1646683621293839 that EP merging is currently sufficient OCP "technical leadership" approval.

Previous work

Customers

assuming none

Epic Goal

• Remove this UI from our stack that we cannot support.

Why is this important?

• Reduce support burden.
• Remove Bugzilla burden of addressing continuous CVEs found in this project.

Acceptance Criteria

• All Prometheus upstream UI links are removed
• Related documentation is updated
• Ports/routes etc configured to expose access to this UI are removed such that no configuration we provide enables access to this UI or its codepaths.
• There is no reason any CVEs found in this UI would ever require intervention by the Monitoring Team.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Make the Prometheus Targets information available in Console UI (https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1079)

Previous Work (Optional):

1. …

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Epic Goal

When users configure CMO to interact with systems outside of an OpenShift cluster, we want to provide an easy way to add the cluster ID to the data send.

Why is this important?

Technically this can be achieved today, by adding an identifying label to the remote_write configuration for a given cluster. The operator adding the remote_write integration needs to take care that the label is unique over the managed fleet of clusters. This however adds management complexity. Any given cluster already has a pseudo-unique datum, that can be used for this purpose.

• Starting in 4.9 we support the Prometheus remote_write feature to send metric data to a storage integration outside of the cluster similar to our own Telemetry service.
• In Telemetry we already use the cluster ID to distinguish the various clusters.
• For users of remote_write this could add an easy way to add such distinguishing information.

Scenarios

1. An organisation with multiple OpenShift clusters want to store their metric data centralized in a dedicated system and use remote_write in all their clusters to send this data. When querying their centralized storage, metadata (here a label) is needed to separate the data of the various clusters.
2. Service providers who manage multiple clusters for multiple customers via a centralized storage system need distinguishing metadata too. See https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSD-6573 for example

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• Document how to use this feature

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. none

Previous Work (Optional):

1. none

Open questions::

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Implementation proposal:

Expose a flag in the CMO configuration, that is false by default (keeps backward compatibility) and when set to true will add the _id label to a remote_write configuration. More specifically it will be added to the top of a remote_write relabel_config list via the replace action. This will add the label as expect, but additionally a user could alter this label in a later relabel config to suit any specific requirements (say rename the label or add additional information to the value).
The location of this flag is the remote_write Spec, so this can be set for individual remote_write configurations.

Epic Goal

• Offer the option to double the scrape intervals for CMO controlled ServiceMonitors in single node deployments
• Alternatively automatically double the same scrape intervals if CMO detects an SNO setup

The potential target ServiceMonitors are:

• kubelet
• kube-state-metrics
• node-exporter
• etcd
• openshift-state-metrics

Why is this important?

• Reduce CPU usage in SNO setups
• Specifically doubling the scrape interval is important because:

1. we are confident that this will have the least chance to interfere with existing rules. We typically have rate queries over the last 2 minutes (no shorter time window). With 30 second scrape intervals (the current default) this gives us 4 samples in any 2 minute window. rate needs at least 2 samples to work, we want another 2 for failure tolerance. Doubling the scrape interval will still give us 2 samples in most 2 minute windows. If a scrape fails, a few rule evaluations might fail intermittently.
2. We expect a measureable reduction of CPU resources (see previous work)

Scenarios

1. RAN deployments (Telco Edge) are SNO deployments. In these setups a full CMO deployment is often not needed and the default setup consumes too many resources. OpenShift as a whole has only very limited CPU cycles available and too many cycles are spend on Monitoring

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• ...

Previous Work (Optional):

1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1569

Open questions:

1. Whether doubling some scrape intervals reduces CPU usage to fit into the assigned budget

Non goals

• Allow arbitrarily long scrape intervals. This will interfere with alert and recoring rules
• Implement a global override to scrape intervals.

Problem:

This epic is mainly focused on the 4.10 Release QE activities

Goal:

1. Identify the scenarios for automation
2. Segregate the test Scenarios into smoke, Regression and other user stories
a. Update the https://docs.jboss.org/display/ODC/Automation+Status+Report
3. Align with layered operator teams for updating scripts
3. Work closely with dev team for epic automation
4. Create the automation scripts using cypress
5. Implement CI for nightly builds
6. Execute scripts on sprint basis

Why is it important?

To the track the QE progress at one place in 4.10 Release Confluence page

Use cases:

1. <case>

Acceptance criteria:

1. <criteria>

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Goal:

This epic covers a number of customer requests(RFEs) as well as increases usability.

Why is it important?

Customer satisfaction as well as improved usability.

Acceptance Criteria

1. Allow user to re-arrange the resources which have ben added to nav by the user
2. Improved user experience (form based experience)
   1. Form based editing of Routes
   2. Form based creation and editing of Config Maps
   3. Form base creation of Deployments
3. Improved discovery
   1. Include Share my project on the Add page to increase discoverability
   2. NS Helm Chart Repo
      1. Add tile to Add page for discoverability
      2. Provide a form driven creation experience
      3. User should be able to switch back and forth from Form/YAML
      4. change the intro text to the below & have the link in the intro text bring up the full page form
         1. Browse for charts that help manage complex installations and upgrades. Cluster administrators can customize the content made available in the catalog. Alternatively, developers can try to configure their own custom Helm Chart repository.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

None

Exploration:

Miro board from Epic Exploration

Problem:

Currently we are only able to get limited telemetry from the Dev Sandbox, but not from any of our managed clusters or on prem clusters.

Goals:

1. Enable gathering segment telemetry whenever cluster telemetry is enabled on OSD clusters
2. Have our OSD clusters opt into telemetry by default
3. Work with PM & UX to identify additional metrics to capture in addition to what we have enabled currently on Sandbox.
4. Ability to get a single report from woopra across all of our Sandbox and OSD clusters.
5. Be able to generate a report including metrics of a single cluster or all clusters of a certain type ( sandbox, or OSD)

Why is it important?

In order to improve properly analyze usage and the user experience, we need to be able to gather as much data as possible.

Goal:
Enhance oc adm release new (and related verbs info, extract, mirror) with heterogeneous architecture support

Epic Goal

• Update image registry dependencies (Kubernetes and OpenShift) to the latest versions.

Why is this important?

• New versions usually bring improvements that are needed by the registry and help with getting updates for z-stream.

Scenarios

1. As an OpenShift engineer, I want my components to use the versions of dependencies, so that they get fixes for known issues and can be easily updated in z-stream.

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Kubernetes 1.24

Previous Work (Optional):

1. IR-210

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>

Epic Goal

• Provide a dedicated dashboard for NVIDIA GPU usage visualization in the OpenShift Console.

Why is this important?

• Customers that use GPUs in their clusters usually have the GPU workloads as the main purpose of their cluster. As such, it makes much more sense to have the details about the usage they are doing of GPGPU resources AND CPU/RAM rather than just CPU/RAM

Scenarios

1. As an admin of a cluster dedicated to data science, I want to quickly find out how much of my very costly resources are currently in use and if things are getting queued due to lack of resources

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. The NVIDIA GPU Operator must export to prometheus the relevant data

Open questions::

1. Will NVIDIA agree to these extra data exports in their GPU Operator?

I asked Zvonko Kaiser and he seemed open to it. I need to confirm with Shiva Merla

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

• Run OpenShift builds that do not execute as the "root" user on the host node.

Why is this important?

• OpenShift builds require an elevated set of capabilities to build a container image
• Builds currently run as root to maintain adequate performance
• Container workloads should run as non-root from the host's perspective. Containers running as root are a known security risk.
• Builds currently run as root and require a privileged container. See BUILD-225 for removing the privileged container requirement.

Scenarios

1. Run BuildConfigs in a multi-tenant environment
2. Run BuildConfigs in a heightened security environment/deployment

Acceptance Criteria

• Developers can opt into running builds in a cri-o user namespace by providing an environment variable with a specific value.
• When the correct environment variable is provided, builds run in a cri-o user namespace, and the build pod does not require the "privileged: true" security context.
• User namespace builds can pass basic test scenarios for the Docker and Source strategy build.
• Steps to run unprivileged builds are documented.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Buildah supports running inside a non-privileged container
2. CRI-O allows workloads to opt into running containers in user namespaces.

Previous Work (Optional):

1. BUILD-225 - remove privileged requirement for builds.

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-533. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

customer is using Azure AD as openid provider and groups synchronization from the provider.

The scenario is the following:

1)

• user A login.
  groups are created with the membership.
  User A is member of a group with admin rights and it's cluster-admin

2)

• user B login:
  groups are updated with membership
  UserB is also member of the group with admin rights and it's cluster admin

3)

• user A login:
  groups are identical as in the former step.
  user A has no administration rights.

The groups memberships are the same in step 2 and 3.
The cluster role bindings of the groups have never changed.

the only way to have user A again the admin rights is to delete the membership from the group and have user A login again.

I have not managed to reproduce this using RH SSO. Neither Azure AD.

But my configuration is not exactly the same yet.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/oauth-apiserver/pull/84

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3307

During initial backporting, due to a number of other colliding commits in upstream, the cobra commands facilitating caching did not get downstreamed. 

This is to downstream those two lines.

• https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/pull/382

• https://github.com/openshift/etcd/pull/170

4.12 will have an option in cri-o: add_inheritable_capabilities which will allow a user to opt-out of dropping inheritable capabilities (which comes as a fix for CVE-2022-27652). We should add it by default as a drop-in in 4.11 so clusters that upgrade from it inherit the old behavior

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3352

Description of problem:

TO address: 'Static Pod is managed but errored" err="managed container xxx does not have Resource.Requests'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-scheduler-operator/pull/449

Description of problem:

Whereabouts doesn't allow the use of network interface names that are not preceded by the prefix "net", see https://github.com/k8snetworkplumbingwg/whereabouts/issues/130.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Define two Pods, one with the interface name 'port1' and the other with 'net-port1':

test-ip-removal-port1:	
              k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/networks:
                [
                  {
                    "name": "test-sriovnd",
                    "interface": "port1",
                    "namespace": "default"
                  }
                ]

test-ip-removal-net-port1:
              k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/networks:
                [
                  {
                    "name": "test-sriovnd",
                    "interface": "net-port1",
                    "namespace": "default"
                  }
                ]

2. IP allocated in the IPPool:

kind: IPPool
...
spec:
  allocations:
    "16":
      id: ...
      podref: test-ecoloma-1/test-ip-removal-port1
    "17":
      id: ...
      podref: test-ecoloma-1/test-ip-removal-net-port1

3. When the ip-reconciler job is run, the allocation for the port with the interface name 'port1' is removed:

[13:29][]$ oc get cronjob -n openshift-multus
NAME            SCHEDULE       SUSPEND   ACTIVE   LAST SCHEDULE   AGE
ip-reconciler   */15 * * * *   False     0        14m             11d

[13:29][]$ oc get ippools.whereabouts.cni.cncf.io -n openshift-multus   2001-1b70-820d-2610---64 -o yaml
apiVersion: whereabouts.cni.cncf.io/v1alpha1
kind: IPPool
metadata:
...
spec:
  allocations:
    "17":
      id: ...
      podref: test-ecoloma-1/test-ip-removal-net-port1
  range: 2001:1b70:820d:2610::/64

[13:30][]$ oc get cronjob -n openshift-multus
NAME            SCHEDULE       SUSPEND   ACTIVE   LAST SCHEDULE   AGE
ip-reconciler   */15 * * * *   False     0        9s              11d

Actual results:

The network interface with a name that doesn't have a 'net' prefix is removed from the ip-reconciler cronjob.

Expected results:

The network interface must not be removed, regardless of the name.

Additional info:

Upstream PR @ https://github.com/k8snetworkplumbingwg/whereabouts/pull/147 master PR @ https://github.com/openshift/whereabouts-cni/pull/94

• https://github.com/openshift/whereabouts-cni/pull/97

Description of problem:

When the user installs a helm chart, the dropdown to select a specific version is always disabled. Also for helm charts that can upgraded or downgraded after installation. For example the nodejs helm chart.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

At least 4.11, maybe all versions, but a backport to 4.11 is fine

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Switch to developer perspective
2. Navigate to Add > Helm chart
3. Select the Nodejs helm chart
4. Try to select another version
..
When the user installs the not selectable version and edit the helm chart there is another version to selec 

Actual results:

The version is not selectable.

Expected results:

The version should be selectable.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12135

Origin tests for the bond-cni

Backport of https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/27405

• https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/27554

plus smaller fixes
this is a backport of https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/pull/263

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/pull/290

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1329. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

etcd and kube-apiserver pods get restarted due to failed liveness probes while deleting/re-creating pods on SNO

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.32

How reproducible:

Not always, after ~10 attempts

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy SNO with Telco DU profile applied
2. Create multiple pods with local storage volumes attached(attaching yaml manifest)
3. Force delete and re-create pods 10 times

Actual results:

etcd and kube-apiserver pods get restarted, making to cluster unavailable for a period of time

Expected results:

etcd and kube-apiserver do not get restarted

Additional info:

Attaching must-gather.

Please let me know if any additional info is required. Thank you!

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/943

Description of problem:

The ovn-kubernetes ovnkube-master containers are continuously crashlooping since we updated to 4.11.0-0.okd-2022-10-15-073651.

Log Excerpt:

] [] []  [{kubectl-client-side-apply Update networking.k8s.io/v1 2022-09-12 12:25:06 +0000 UTC FieldsV1 {"f:metadata":{"f:annotations":{".":{},"f:kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration":{}}},"f:spec":{"f:ingress":{},"f:policyTypes":{}}} }]},Spec:NetworkPolicySpec{PodSelector:{map[] []},Ingress:[]NetworkPolicyIngressRule{NetworkPolicyIngressRule{Ports:[]NetworkPolicyPort{},From:[]NetworkPolicyPeer{NetworkPolicyPeer{PodSelector:&v1.LabelSelector{MatchLabels:map[string]string{access: true,},MatchExpressions:[]LabelSelectorRequirement{},},NamespaceSelector:nil,IPBlock:nil,},},},},Egress:[]NetworkPolicyEgressRule{},PolicyTypes:[Ingress],},} &NetworkPolicy{ObjectMeta:{allow-from-openshift-ingress  compsci-gradcentral  a405f843-c250-40d7-8dd4-a759f764f091 217304038 1 2022-09-22 14:36:38 +0000 UTC <nil> <nil> map[] map[] [] []  [{openshift-apiserver Update networking.k8s.io/v1 2022-09-22 14:36:38 +0000 UTC FieldsV1 {"f:spec":{"f:ingress":{},"f:policyTypes":{}}} }]},Spec:NetworkPolicySpec{PodSelector:{map[] []},Ingress:[]NetworkPolicyIngressRule{NetworkPolicyIngressRule{Ports:[]NetworkPolicyPort{},From:[]NetworkPolicyPeer{NetworkPolicyPeer{PodSelector:nil,NamespaceSelector:&v1.LabelSelector{MatchLabels:map[string]string{policy-group.network.openshift.io/ingress: ,},MatchExpressions:[]LabelSelectorRequirement{},},IPBlock:nil,},},},},Egress:[]NetworkPolicyEgressRule{},PolicyTypes:[Ingress],},}]: cannot clean up egress default deny ACL name: error in transact with ops [{Op:mutate Table:Port_Group Row:map[] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[{Column:acls Mutator:delete Value:{GoSet:[{GoUUID:60cb946a-46e9-4623-9ba4-3cb35f018ed6}]}}] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {ccdd01bf-3009-42fb-9672-e1df38190cd7}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:} {Op:mutate Table:Port_Group Row:map[] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[{Column:acls Mutator:delete Value:{GoSet:[{GoUUID:60cb946a-46e9-4623-9ba4-3cb35f018ed6}]}}] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {10bbf229-8c1b-4c62-b36e-4ba0097722db}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:} {Op:delete Table:ACL Row:map[] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {7b55ba0c-150f-4a63-9601-cfde25f29408}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:} {Op:delete Table:ACL Row:map[] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {60cb946a-46e9-4623-9ba4-3cb35f018ed6}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:}] results [{Count:1 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:1 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:1 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:1 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:0 Error:referential integrity violation Details:cannot delete ACL row 7b55ba0c-150f-4a63-9601-cfde25f29408 because of 1 remaining reference(s) UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]}] and errors []: referential integrity violation: cannot delete ACL row 7b55ba0c-150f-4a63-9601-cfde25f29408 because of 1 remaining reference(s)

Additional info:

https://github.com/okd-project/okd/issues/1372

Issue persisted through update to 4.11.0-0.okd-2022-10-28-153352

must-gather: https://nbc9-snips.cloud.duke.edu/snips/must-gather.local.2859117512952590880.zip

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1444

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-451. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Git icon shown in the repository details page should be based on the git provider.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a Repository with gitlab repo url
2. Navigate to the detail page.

Actual results:

github icon is displayed for the gitlab url.

Expected results:

gitlab icon should be displayed for the gitlab url.

Additional info:

use `GitLabIcon` and `BitBucketIcon` from patternfly react-icons.

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12005

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1334

OVS 2.17+ introduced an optimization of "weak references" to substantially speed up database snapshots. in some cases weak references may leak memory; to aforementioned commit fixes that and has been pulled into ovs2.17-62 and later.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1438

Description of problem:

Each LB created for a Service type LoadBalancer results in 1 client rule and <# of public subnets> health rules being created.  The rules per SG quota in AWS is quite small; 60 by default, and 200 hard max.  OCP has about 40 rules OOTB. Assuming an HA cluster in 3 AZs, that is 4 rules per LB.  With default AWS quota, only ~5 LBs can be create and with the hard max of 200, only ~40 LBs can be created.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.  Create Service type LoadBalancer and observe increase in master-sg and worker-sg rules sets
2.
3.

Actual results:

4 rules are created

Expected results:

1 rules is created when the client rule is a superset of the per-subnet health rules

Additional info:

This ~4x the number of Services of type LoadBalancer.  This is required for Hypershift.

• https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1375

Description of problem:

There is a bug affecting verify steps functionality on iDRAC hardware in OpenShift 4.11 and 4.10. Original bug report has been made against 4.10:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-1740

While I am not aware of this issue being reported against 4.11, due to the fact that the fix is only present in 4.12 codebase, 4.11 versions will also be affected by this issue.

This bug is created to meet automation requirements for backporting the fixes from 4.12 version to 4.11 (and then to 4.11 in the bug quoted above).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/ironic-image/pull/302

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2079. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

The setting of systemReserved: ephemeral-storage in KubeletConfig is not working as expected. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.z, may exist on other OCP versions as well. 

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a KubeletConfig on the node:

apiVersion: machineconfiguration.openshift.io/v1
kind: KubeletConfig
metadata:
  name: system-reserved-config
spec:
  machineConfigPoolSelector:
    matchLabels:
      pools.operator.machineconfiguration.openshift.io/master: ""
  kubeletConfig:
    systemReserved:
      cpu: 500m
      memory: 500Mi
      ephemeral-storage: 10Gi


2. Check node allocatable storage with command: oc describe node |grep -C 5 ephemeral-storage

Actual results:

The Allocatable:ephemeral-storage on the node is not capacity.ephemeral-storage - systemReserved.ephemeral-storage - eviction-thresholds (10% of the capacity.ephemeral-storage by default)  

Expected results:

The Allocatable:ephemeral-storage on the node should be capacity.ephemeral-storage - systemReserved.ephemeral-storage - eviction-thresholds (10% of the capacity.ephemeral-storage by default) 

Additional info:

The root cause might be: process argument '--system-reserved=cpu=500m,memory=500Mi' overwrote the setting in /etc/kubernetes/kubelet.conf, one example:

root        6824       1 27 Sep30 ?        1-09:00:24 kubelet --config=/etc/kubernetes/kubelet.conf --bootstrap-kubeconfig=/etc/kubernetes/kubeconfig --kubeconfig=/var/lib/kubelet/kubeconfig --container-runtime=remote --container-runtime-endpoint=/var/run/crio/crio.sock --runtime-cgroups=/system.slice/crio.service --node-labels=node-role.kubernetes.io/master,node.openshift.io/os_id=rhcos --node-ip=192.168.58.47 --minimum-container-ttl-duration=6m0s --cloud-provider= --volume-plugin-dir=/etc/kubernetes/kubelet-plugins/volume/exec --hostname-override= --register-with-taints=node-role.kubernetes.io/master=:NoSchedule --pod-infra-container-image=quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:4a7b6408460148cb73c59677dbc2c261076bc07226c43b0c9192cc70aef5ba62 --system-reserved=cpu=500m,memory=500Mi --v=2 --housekeeping-interval=30s

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3381

Discovered in the must gather kubelet_service.log from https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-sdn-upgrade/1586093220087992320

It appears the guard pod names are too long, and being truncated down to where they will collide with those from the other masters.

From kubelet logs in this run:

❯ grep openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste kubelet_service.log
Oct 28 23:58:55.693391 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-1 kubenswrapper[1657]: E1028 23:58:55.693346    1657 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-1" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste"
Oct 28 23:59:03.735726 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-0 kubenswrapper[1670]: E1028 23:59:03.735671    1670 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-0" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste"
Oct 28 23:59:11.168082 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-2 kubenswrapper[1667]: E1028 23:59:11.168041    1667 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-2" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste"

This also looks to be happening for openshift-kube-scheduler-guard, kube-controller-manager-guard, possibly others.

Looks like they should be truncated further to make room for random suffixes in https://github.com/openshift/library-go/blame/bd9b0e19121022561dcd1d9823407cd58b2265d0/pkg/operator/staticpod/controller/guard/guard_controller.go#L97-L98

Unsure of the implications here, it looks a little scary.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator/pull/1429
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-controller-manager-operator/pull/690
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-scheduler-operator/pull/458

When a thin provisioned COW format disk is created on OCP on RHV via CSI driver (a PVC -
https://github.com/openshift/ovirt-csi-driver/blob/master/deploy/example/storage-claim.yaml

• with for example requested storage 100 GB), the go-ovirt-client behaviour makes it so that the created disk has virtual size 100 GB and it's actual size is 110 GB.

But this is thin provisioned disk, so the initial size of the disk should be default of the engine and then grow as needed, it shouldn't be this big.

This causes all the disks created this way to be functionally preallocated (since it eats all that space), which is a real waste of space.

How reproducible: 100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a storage claim (PVC) in Openshift (
https://github.com/openshift/ovirt-csi-driver/blob/master/deploy/example/storage-claim.yaml
) using the default storage class (or any other storage class with thinProvisioning: "true") and with requested storage i.e. 100Gi

$ oc create -f storage-claim.yaml

2. In the RHV web console navigate to Storage -> Disks and check Virtual size and Actual size of the created disk (PVC)

Actual results:
Disk from our example with requested storage 100GB reports virtual size 100GB and actual size 110 GB.

Expected results:
Thin provisioned disks should start with small initial size and then grow as needed, so its actual size should be considerably smaller (the default initial size set by the engine should be 2.5 GB if I'm not mistaken).

Note: The extra 10GB in the actual size are caused by overhead for the qcow2 disk format, which is 10%, and this was tracked here as a separate issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097139

• https://github.com/openshift/ovirt-csi-driver/pull/115

We will want to establish some basic metrics we can report back to Telemetry.

Let's consider:

• Operator installs
• Backups, created, success, error
• Restores created, success, error

Below is some background info from MTC when we added Telemetry support that may help

See:  https://github.com/konveyor/metrics-queries/blob/master/README.md

• MTC - active customers from telemetry
• Migration Toolkit - telemetry usage tracking
• MIG - Metrics Info

Design/Development info:

OpenShift Monitoring Integration Guide

Sending metrics via telemetry

Monitoring integration with OLM operators

https://www.openshift.com/blog/observability-superpower-correlation

Source Code:

https://github.com/konveyor/mig-controller/blob/master/pkg/controller/migmigration/metrics.go

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator/pull/1536

Description of problem:

Users search a resource (for example, Pod) with Name filter applied and input a text to the filter field then the search results filtered accordingly. 

Once the results are shown, when the user clear the value in one-shot (i.e. select whole filter text from the field and clear it using delete or backspace key) from the field, 

then the search result doesn't clear accordingly and the previous result stays on the page.

Version-Release number of selected components (if applicable):

4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-08-16-194731 & works fine with OCP 4.12 latest version.

How reproducible:

 Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Login to OCP web console.
2. Go to the Search section.
3. Select the resource filter and choose a resource (for example , Pod)
4. Change the filter option to "Name" and input a text( for example, installer) to the filter field.
5. Once the results are shown, select the whole filter text ( i.e. installer).
6. Clear the text using the Delete or Backspace key.
7. View the behavior on search results

Actual results:

Search result doesn't clear when user clears name filter in one-shot for any resources.

Expected results:

Search results should clear when the user clears name filters in one-shot for any resources.

Additional info:

Reproduced in both chrome[103.0.5060.114 (Official Build) (64-bit)] and firefox[91.11.0esr (64-bit)] browsers.

Attached screen share for the same issue. SearchIssues.mp4

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11975

As discussed previously by email, customer support case 03211616 requests a means to use the latest patch version of a given X.Y golang via imagestreams, with the blocking issue being the lack of X.Y tags for the go-toolset containers on RHCC.

The latter has now been fixed with the latest version also getting a :1.17 tag, and the imagestream source has been modified accordingly, which will get picked up in 4.12. We can now fix this in 4.11.z by backporting this to the imagestream files bundled in cluster-samples-operator.

/cc Ian Watson Feny Mehta

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-samples-operator/pull/467

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1498

This was originally reported in BZ as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046335

—

Description of problem:

The issue reported here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954121 still occur (tested on OCP 4.8.11, the CU also verified that the issue can happen even with OpenShift 4.7.30, 4.8.17 and 4.9.11)

How reproducible:

Attach a NIC to a master node will trigger the issue

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Deploy an OCP cluster (I've tested it IPI on AWS)
2. Attach a second NIC to a running master node (in my case "ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal")

Actual results:

~~~
$ oc get node ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal -o json | jq ".status.addresses"
[

,

,

,

]

$ oc get co etcd
NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING DEGRADED SINCE
etcd 4.8.11 True False True 31h

$ oc get co etcd -o json | jq ".status.conditions[0]"

~~~

Expected results:

To have the certificate valid also for the second IP (the newly created one "10.0.187.247")

Additional info:

Deleting the following secrets seems to solve the issue:
~~~
$ oc get secret n openshift-etcd | grep kubernetes.io/tls | grep ^etcd
etcd-client kubernetes.io/tls 2 61s
etcd-peer-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 61s
etcd-peer-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 61s
etcd-peer-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 60s
etcd-serving-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 60s
etcd-serving-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 59s
etcd-serving-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 59s
etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 58s
etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 59s
etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 58s

$ oc get secret n openshift-etcd | grep kubernetes.io/tls | grep ^etcd | awk '

' | xargs -I {} oc delete secret {} -n openshift-etcd
secret "etcd-client" deleted
secret "etcd-peer-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-peer-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-peer-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted

$ oc get co etcd -o json | jq ".status.conditions[0]"

~~~

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/931

An RW mutex was introduced to the project auth cache with https://github.com/openshift/openshift-apiserver/pull/267, taking exclusive access during cache syncs. On clusters with extremely high object counts for namespaces and RBAC, syncs appear to be extremely slow (on the order of several minutes). The project LIST handler acquires the same mutex in shared mode as part of its critical path.

• https://github.com/openshift/openshift-apiserver/pull/327

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator/pull/1821

Created attachment 1905034 [details]
Plugin page with error

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install a plugin with a page that has a runtime error. (Demo Plugin -> Dynamic Nav 1 currently has an error for me, but you can reproduce by editing any plugin and introducing an error.)
2. Observe the "something went wrong" error message.
3. Navigate to any other page (e.g. Workloads -> Pods)

Expected result:

The pods page is displayed.

Action result:

The error message persists. There is no way to clear except to refresh the browser.

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11968

Description of problem:

Provisioning interface on master node not getting ipv4 dhcp ip address from bootstrap dhcp server on OCP 4.10.16 IPI BareMetal install.

Customer is performing an OCP 4.10.16 IPI BareMetal install and bootstrap node provisions just fine, but when master nodes are booted for provisioning, they are not getting an ipv4 address via dhcp. As such, the install is not moving forward at this point.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.10.16

How reproducible:

Perform OCP 4.10.16 IPI BareMetal install.

Actual results:

provisioning interface comes up (as evidenced by ipv6 address) but is not getting an ipv4 address via dhcp. OCP install / provisioning fails at this point.

Expected results:

provisioning interface successfully received an ipv4 ip address and successfully provisioned master nodes (and subsequently worker nodes as well.)

Additional info:

As a troubleshooting measure, manually adding an ipv4 ip address did allow the coreos image on the bootstrap node to be reached via curl.

Further, the kernel boot line for the first master node was updated for a static ip addresss assignment for further confirmation that the master node would successfully image this way which further confirming that the issue is the provisioning interface not receiving an ipv4 ip address from the dhcp server.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/pull/298

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3265. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3172. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Customer is trying to install the Logging operator, which appears to attempt to install a dynamic plugin. The operator installation fails in the console because permissions aren't available to "patch resource consoles".

We shouldn't block operator installation if permission issues prevent dynamic plugin installation.

This is an OSD cluster, presumably for a customer with "cluster-admin", although it may be a paired down permission set called "dedicated-admin".

See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hYS-bm6aH7S6z7We76dn9XOFcpi9CGYcGoJys514YSY/edit for permissions investigation work on OSD

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12240

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5761. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5458. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
reported in https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C027U68LP/p1673010878672479

Description of problem:

Hey guys, I have a openshift cluster that was upgraded to version 4.9.58 from version 4.8. After the upgrade was done, the etcd pod on master1 isn't coming up and is crashlooping. and it gives the following error: {"level":"fatal","ts":"2023-01-06T12:12:58.709Z","caller":"etcdmain/etcd.go:204","msg":"discovery failed","error":"wal: max entry size limit exceeded, recBytes: 13279, fileSize(313430016) - offset(313418480) - padBytes(1) = entryLimit(11535)","stacktrace":"go.etcd.io/etcd/server/v3/etcdmain.startEtcdOrProxyV2\n\t/remote-source/cachito-gomod-with-deps/app/server/etcdmain/etcd.go:204\ngo.etcd.io/etcd/server/v3/etcdmain.Main\n\t/remote-source/cachito-gomod-with-deps/app/server/etcdmain/main.go:40\nmain.main\n\t/remote-source/cachito-gomod-with-deps/app/server/main.go:32\nruntime.main\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/proc.go:225"}

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/etcd/pull/178

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1272

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-501. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem: 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.10.16

How reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Edit the apiserver resource and add spec.audit.customRules field

$ oc get apiserver cluster -o yaml
spec:
audit:
customRules:

• group: system:authenticated:oauth
  profile: AllRequestBodies
• group: system:authenticated
  profile: AllRequestBodies
  profile: Default

2. Allow the kube-apiserver pods to rollout new revision.
3. Once the kube-apiserver pods are in new revision execute $ oc get dc

Actual results:

Error from server (InternalError): an error on the server ("This request caused apiserver to panic. Look in the logs for details.") has prevented the request from succeeding (get deploymentconfigs.apps.openshift.io)

Expected results: The command "oc get dc" should display the deploymentconfig without any error.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/openshift-apiserver/pull/336

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1805. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
The vSphere CSI cloud.conf lists the single datacenter from platform workspace config but in a multi-zone setup (https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/918 ) there may be more than the one datacenter.

This issue is resulting in PVs failing to attach because the virtual machines can't be find in any other datacenter. For example:

0s Warning FailedAttachVolume pod/image-registry-85b5d5db54-m78vp AttachVolume.Attach failed for volume "pvc-ab1a0611-cb3b-418d-bb3b-1e7bbe2a69ed" : rpc error: code = Internal desc = failed to find VirtualMachine for node:"rbost-zonal-ghxp2-worker-3-xm7gw". Error: virtual machine wasn't found  

The machine above lives in datacenter-2 but the CSI cloud.conf is only aware of the datacenter IBMCloud.

$ oc get cm vsphere-csi-config -o yaml  -n openshift-cluster-csi-drivers | grep datacenters
    datacenters = "IBMCloud" 

• https://github.com/openshift/vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator/pull/130

Description of problem:

AWS tagging - when applying user defined tags you cannot add more than 10

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6303

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3346

Description of problem:

Manual backport of 
* https://github.com/openshift/cluster-dns-operator/pull/336
* https://github.com/openshift/cluster-dns-operator/pull/339

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-dns-operator/pull/347

Description of problem:
-----------------------
On dualstack baremetal IPI cluster next error message is present in ovnkube logs:

oc logs -n openshift-ovn-kubernetes ovnkube-node-rvggh -c ovnkube-node
...

E0810 02:12:46.343460 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:13:16.347603 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:13:46.351108 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:14:16.355047 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:14:46.358950 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
I0810 02:15:13.313945 353971 reflector.go:535] k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:134: Watch close - *v1.Service total 9 items received
E0810 02:15:16.362737 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:15:46.366490 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:16:16.369963 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
I0810 02:16:24.306561 353971 reflector.go:535] k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:134: Watch close - *v1.Endpoints total 560 items received
E0810 02:16:46.373482 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:17:16.377497 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:17:46.380726 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
I0810 02:18:15.325871 353971 reflector.go:535] k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:134: Watch close - *v1.Node total 50 items received
E0810 02:18:16.384732 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
I0810 02:18:38.299738 353971 reflector.go:535] k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:134: Watch close - *v1.Pod total 9 items received
E0810 02:18:46.388162 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:19:16.391669 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
-------------------------------------------------------------
OCP-4.10.26

ovn-2021-21.12.0-58.el8fdp.x86_64
ovn-2021-host-21.12.0-58.el8fdp.x86_64
ovn-2021-central-21.12.0-58.el8fdp.x86_64
ovn-2021-vtep-21.12.0-58.el8fdp.x86_64

How reproducible:
-----------------
so far spotted on 2 different clusters

Steps to Reproduce:
-------------------
1. Deploy dualstack baremetal IPI cluster with OVNKubernetesHybrid network(add next to cluster's config before running cluster install):

defaultNetwork:
type: OVNKubernetes
ovnKubernetesConfig:
hybridOverlayConfig:
hybridClusterNetwork: []

Actual results:
---------------
Error message in logs

Expected results:
-----------------
No error message in logs

Additional info:
----------------
Baremetal dualstack setup with 3 masters and 4 workers, bonding configured for baremetal network on masters and workers

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1350

Description of problem:

The last egressIP in IP capacity cannot be applied correctly

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-11-27-164248 

How reproducible:

Found this failure in automation case which used to pass

Steps to Reproduce:

In AWS, one worker node is with IP capacity "ipv4:14"
 $oc describe node ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal | egrep -C 3 egress
Annotations:        cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig:
                      [{"interface":"eni-03820ba0eca427fbf","ifaddr":{"ipv4":"10.0.128.0/18"},"capacity":{"ipv4":14,"ipv6":15}}]
                    csi.volume.kubernetes.io/nodeid: {"ebs.csi.aws.com":"i-0cb3ae15bf3cffd9f"}
                    k8s.ovn.org/host-addresses: ["10.0.129.21"]

1. Label above node as egress node
2. Created 15 egressIP objects, each egressIP object with one egressIP.

Actual results:

 13 egressIPs applied correctly , last one is in wrong status.
% oc get egressip
NAME                EGRESSIPS      ASSIGNED NODE                               ASSIGNED EGRESSIPS
egressip-47208-0    10.0.135.200   ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal   10.0.135.200
egressip-47208-1    10.0.162.178   ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal   10.0.162.178
egressip-47208-10   10.0.144.46    ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal   10.0.144.46
egressip-47208-11   10.0.191.91    ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal   10.0.191.91
egressip-47208-12   10.0.133.215   ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal   10.0.133.215
egressip-47208-13   10.0.174.207   ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal   10.0.174.207
egressip-47208-14   10.0.176.224   ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal   10.0.176.224
egressip-47208-2    10.0.184.114   ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal   10.0.184.114
egressip-47208-3    10.0.167.224   ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal   10.0.167.224
egressip-47208-4    10.0.187.148   ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal   10.0.187.148
egressip-47208-5    10.0.184.109   ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal   10.0.184.109
egressip-47208-6    10.0.155.208                                               
egressip-47208-7    10.0.134.13    ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal   10.0.134.13
egressip-47208-8    10.0.142.255   ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal   10.0.142.255
egressip-47208-9    10.0.170.197

% oc get cloudprivateipconfig
NAME           AGE
10.0.133.215   113s
10.0.134.13    113s
10.0.135.200   113s
10.0.142.255   113s
10.0.144.46    113s
10.0.155.208   113s
10.0.162.178   113s
10.0.167.224   113s
10.0.174.207   113s
10.0.176.224   113s
10.0.184.109   113s
10.0.184.114   113s
10.0.187.148   113s
10.0.191.91    113s

 oc get cloudprivateipconfig 10.0.155.208  -o yaml
apiVersion: cloud.network.openshift.io/v1
kind: CloudPrivateIPConfig
metadata:
  annotations:
    k8s.ovn.org/egressip-owner-ref: egressip-47208-6
  creationTimestamp: "2022-11-28T09:13:47Z"
  finalizers:
  - cloudprivateipconfig.cloud.network.openshift.io/finalizer
  generation: 1
  name: 10.0.155.208
  resourceVersion: "72869"
  uid: 0143a07b-0a30-4de8-bfd7-589ed0c3d7dc
spec:
  node: ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal
status:
  conditions:
  - lastTransitionTime: "2022-11-28T09:16:51Z"
    message: 'Error processing cloud assignment request, err: <nil>'
    observedGeneration: 1
    reason: CloudResponseError
    status: "False"
    type: Assigned
  node: ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal

Expected results:

As IP capacity for this node is 14, so here should have 14 egress IP applied successfully. No cloudprivateipconfig IP in error status.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/pull/83

This bug card represents work done in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CCO-257 to set STS endpoints to regional in AWS credentials secrets and is created to facilitate backporting the change to previous releases as required by the backport process [1].

[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qbKUl4K9PPW4tCbdDgWSXd5klosX77ifkxQLqzjztGE/edit#heading=h.mml0rz88o0nj

• https://github.com/openshift/cloud-credential-operator/pull/503

update ironic software to pick up latest bug fixes

update dependencies as needed

this is also related to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115122

• https://github.com/openshift/ironic-image/pull/294
• https://github.com/openshift/ironic-agent-image/pull/62

• https://github.com/openshift/cloud-provider-vsphere/pull/26

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2495. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Failures like:

$ oc login --token=...

Logged into "https://api..." as "..." using the token provided.

Error from server (Timeout): the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get projects.project.openshift.io)

break login, which tries to gather information before saving the configuration, including a giant project list.

Ideally login would be able to save the successful login credentials, even when the informative gathering had difficulties. And possibly the informative gathering could be made conditional (--quiet or similar?) so expensive gathering could be skipped in use-cases where the context was not needed.

• https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/1274

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3434

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4499. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-860. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

In GCP, once an external IP address is assigned to master/infra node through GCP console, numbers of pending CSR from kubernetes.io/kubelet-serving is increasing, and the following error are reported:

I0902 10:48:29.254427       1 controller.go:121] Reconciling CSR: csr-q7bwd
I0902 10:48:29.365774       1 csr_check.go:157] csr-q7bwd: CSR does not appear to be client csr
I0902 10:48:29.371827       1 csr_check.go:545] retrieving serving cert from build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal (10.0.0.5:10250)
I0902 10:48:29.375052       1 csr_check.go:188] Found existing serving cert for build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal
I0902 10:48:29.375152       1 csr_check.go:192] Could not use current serving cert for renewal: CSR Subject Alternate Name values do not match current certificate
I0902 10:48:29.375166       1 csr_check.go:193] Current SAN Values: [build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal 10.0.0.5], CSR SAN Values: [build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal 10.0.0.5 35.211.234.95]
I0902 10:48:29.375175       1 csr_check.go:202] Falling back to machine-api authorization for build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal
E0902 10:48:29.375184       1 csr_check.go:420] csr-q7bwd: IP address '35.211.234.95' not in machine addresses: 10.0.0.5
I0902 10:48:29.375193       1 csr_check.go:205] Could not use Machine for serving cert authorization: IP address '35.211.234.95' not in machine addresses: 10.0.0.5
I0902 10:48:29.379457       1 csr_check.go:218] Falling back to serving cert renewal with Egress IP checks
I0902 10:48:29.382668       1 csr_check.go:221] Could not use current serving cert and egress IPs for renewal: CSR Subject Alternate Names includes unknown IP addresses
I0902 10:48:29.382702       1 controller.go:233] csr-q7bwd: CSR not authorized

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.2

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Assign external IPs to master/infra node in GCP
2. oc get csr | grep kubernetes.io/kubelet-serving

Actual results:

CSRs are not approved

Expected results:

CSRs are approved

Additional info:

This issue is only happen in GCP. Same OpenShift installations in AWS do not have this issue.

It looks like the CSR are created using external IP addresses once assigned.

Ref: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C03KEQZC1L2/p1662122007083059

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-provider-gcp/pull/27

We are in the process of moving our bug tracking to JIRA. We should update the report bug link in the help menu to use JIRA instead of Bugzilla for new bugs. Opening as a medium severity bug since this only impacts prerelease OpenShift versions. For release versions, we have users open customer cases.

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11965

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1226. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
We added server groups for control plane and computes as part of OSASINFRA-2570, except for UPI that only creates server group for the control plane.

We need to update the UPI scripts to create server group for computes to be consistent with IPI and have the instruction at https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/machine_management/creating_machinesets/creating-machineset-osp.html work out of the box in case customers want to create MachineSets on their UPI clusters.

Related to OCPCLOUD-1135.

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6351

This is a copy of Bugzilla bug 2117524 for backport to 4.11.z

Original Text:

Description of problem:
On routers configured with mTLS and CRL defined in the CA with a CDP ; new CRL is downloaded only when restarting the ingress-operator.

2022-07-20T23:36:26.943Z	INFO	operator.clientca_configmap_controller	controller/controller.go:298	reconciling	{"request": "openshift-ingress-operator/service-bdrc"}
2022-07-20T23:36:26.943Z	INFO	operator.crl	crl/crl_configmap.go:69	certificate revocation list has expired	{"subject key identifier": "6aa909992e9890457b2a8de5659a44cab8e867a8"}
2022-07-20T23:36:26.943Z	INFO	operator.crl	crl/crl_configmap.go:69	retrieving certificate revocation list	{"subject key identifier": "6aa909992e9890457b2a8de5659a44cab8e867a8"}
2022-07-20T23:36:26.943Z	INFO	operator.crl	crl/crl_configmap.go:169	retrieving CRL distribution point	{"distribution point": "http://crl.domain.com/der/CN=XXXX,OU=XXX,O=XXX,C=XXX"}

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.9.33

How reproducible:
Enable mTLS with a CRL

Actual results:
CRL is not download when expired
Clients get "SSL client certificate not trusted" errors while accessing resources

Expected results:
ingress-operator triggers CRL download when approaching expiration date so that the configmap is updated without manual action

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pull/853

Following the trail
https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver/issues/1139
https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver/pull/1175
https://github.com/openshift/aws-ebs-csi-driver/pull/206
 
Looks like the fix should be in 4.12, but it still see it being 39 vs ~24 on an m6i instance type.

It seems that the kubelet applies this capacity to the node in 4.11 and earlier and, thus, unlikely to receive this fix for attachable volumes in the upstream CSI driver. 4.12 behavior is currently unknown but it seems that the kubelet might still be setting this capacity.

The actual issue is that kube scheduler schedules pods that require PVs to nodes where those PVs can not be attached.

• https://github.com/openshift/aws-ebs-csi-driver/pull/213

Description of problem:

In a 4.11 cluster with only openshift-samples enabled, the 4.12 introduced optional COs console and insights are installed. While upgrading to 4.12, CVO considers them to be disabled explicitly and skips reconciling them. So these COs are not upgraded to 4.12.

Installed COs cannot be disabled, so CVO is supposed to implicitly enable them.


$ oc get clusterversion -oyaml
{
  "apiVersion": "config.openshift.io/v1",
     "kind": "ClusterVersion",
     "metadata": {
         "creationTimestamp": "2022-09-30T05:02:31Z",
         "generation": 3,
         "name": "version",
         "resourceVersion": "134808",
         "uid": "bd95473f-ffda-402d-8fe3-74f852a9d6eb"
     },
     "spec": {
         "capabilities": {
             "additionalEnabledCapabilities": [
                 "openshift-samples"
             ],
             "baselineCapabilitySet": "None"
         },
         "channel": "stable-4.11",
         "clusterID": "8eda5167-a730-4b39-be1d-214a80506d34",
         "desiredUpdate": {
             "force": true,
             "image": "registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc",
             "version": ""
         }
     },
     "status": {
         "availableUpdates": null,
         "capabilities": {
             "enabledCapabilities": [
                 "openshift-samples"
             ],
             "knownCapabilities": [
                 "Console",
                 "Insights",
                 "Storage",
                 "baremetal",
                 "marketplace",
                 "openshift-samples"
             ]
         },
         "conditions": [
             {
                 "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T05:02:33Z",
                 "message": "Unable to retrieve available updates: currently reconciling cluster version 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 not found in the \"stable-4.11\" channel",
                 "reason": "VersionNotFound",
                 "status": "False",
                 "type": "RetrievedUpdates"
             },
             {
                 "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T05:02:33Z",
                 "message": "Capabilities match configured spec",
                 "reason": "AsExpected",
                 "status": "False",
                 "type": "ImplicitlyEnabledCapabilities"
             },
             {
                 "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T05:02:33Z",
                 "message": "Payload loaded version=\"4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419\" image=\"registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc\" architecture=\"amd64\"",
                 "reason": "PayloadLoaded",
                 "status": "True",
                 "type": "ReleaseAccepted"
             },
             {
                 "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T05:23:18Z",
                 "message": "Done applying 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419",
                 "status": "True",
                 "type": "Available"
             },
             {
                 "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T07:05:42Z",
                 "status": "False",
                 "type": "Failing"
             },
             {
                 "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T07:41:53Z",
                 "message": "Cluster version is 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419",
                 "status": "False",
                 "type": "Progressing"
             }
         ],
         "desired": {
             "image": "registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc",
             "version": "4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419"
         },
         "history": [
             {
                 "completionTime": "2022-09-30T07:41:53Z",
                 "image": "registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc",
                 "startedTime": "2022-09-30T06:42:01Z",
                 "state": "Completed",
                 "verified": false,
                 "version": "4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419"
             },
             {
                 "completionTime": "2022-09-30T05:23:18Z",
                 "image": "registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:5a6f6d1bf5c752c75d7554aa927c06b5ea0880b51909e83387ee4d3bca424631",
                 "startedTime": "2022-09-30T05:02:33Z",
                 "state": "Completed",
                 "verified": false,
                 "version": "4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-29-191451"
             }
         ],
         "observedGeneration": 3,
         "versionHash": "CSCJ2fxM_2o="
     }
 }

$ oc get co
 NAME                                       VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
authentication                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      93m     
cloud-controller-manager                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h56m   
cloud-credential                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h59m   
cluster-autoscaler                         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h53m   
config-operator                            4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m   
console                                    4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-29-191451   True        False         False      3h45m   
control-plane-machine-set                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      117m    
csi-snapshot-controller                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m   
dns                                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h53m   
etcd                                       4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h52m   
image-registry                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h46m   
ingress                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      151m    
insights                                   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-29-191451   True        False         False      3h48m   
kube-apiserver                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h50m   
kube-controller-manager                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h51m   
kube-scheduler                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h51m   
kube-storage-version-migrator              4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      91m     
machine-api                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h50m   
machine-approver                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m   
machine-config                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h52m   
monitoring                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h44m   
network                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h55m   
node-tuning                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      113m    
openshift-apiserver                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h48m   
openshift-controller-manager               4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      113m    
openshift-samples                          4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      116m    
operator-lifecycle-manager                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m   
operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m   
operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h48m   
service-ca                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m   
storage                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install a 4.11 cluster with only openshift-samples enabled
2. Upgrade to 4.12
3.

Actual results:

The 4.12 introduced optional CO console and insights are not upgraded to 4.12

Expected results:

All the installed COs get upgraded

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pull/854

Description of problem:
Users on a fully-disconnected cluster could not see Devfiles in the developer catalog or import a Devfiles. That's fine.

But the API calls /api/devfile/samples/ and /api/devfile/ takes 30 seconds until they fail with a 504 Gateway timeout error.

If possible they should fail immediately.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
This might happen since 4.8

Tested this yet only on 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-07-112008

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Start a disconnected cluster with a proxy
2. Open the browser network inspector and filter for /api/devfile
3. Switch to Developer perspective
   1. Navigate to Add > Developer Catalog (All Services) > Devfiles
   2. Or Add > Import from Git > and enter https://github.com/devfile-samples/devfile-sample-go-basic.git

Actual results:

• Network call fails after 30 seconds
• Import doesn't work

Expected results:

• Network calls should fail immediately
• We doesn't expect that the import will work

Additional info:
The console Pod log contains this error:

E0909 10:28:18.448680 1 devfile-handler.go:74] Failed to parse devfile: failed to populateAndParseDevfile: Get "https://registry.devfile.io/devfiles/go": context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12186

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3117. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3084. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Upstream Issue: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/77603

Long log lines get corrupted when using '--timestamps' by the Kubelet.

The root cause is that the buffer reads up to a new line. If the line is greater than 4096 bytes and '--timestamps' is turrned on the kubelet will write the timestamp and the partial log line. We will need to refactor the ReadLogs function to allow for a partial line read.

https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/f892ab1bd7fd97f1fcc2e296e85fdb8e3e8fb82d/pkg/kubelet/kuberuntime/logs/logs.go#L325

apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
  name: logs
spec:
  restartPolicy: Never
  containers:
  - name: logs
    image: fedora
    args:
    - bash
    - -c
    - 'for i in `seq 1 10000000`; do echo -n $i; done'

kubectl logs logs --timestamps

• https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1408

Description of problem:

Upgrade OCP 4.11 --> 4.12 fails with one 'NotReady,SchedulingDisabled' node and MachineConfigDaemonFailed.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Upgrade from OCP 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532 on top of OSP RHOS-16.2-RHEL-8-20220804.n.1 to 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107.

Network Type: OVNKubernetes

How reproducible:

Twice out of two attempts.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OCP 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532 (IPI) on top of OSP RHOS-16.2-RHEL-8-20220804.n.1.
   The cluster is up and running with three workers:
   $ oc get clusterversion
   NAME      VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
   version   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532   True        False         51m     Cluster version is 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532

2. Run the OC command to upgrade to 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107:
$ oc adm upgrade --to-image=registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 --allow-explicit-upgrade --force=true
warning: Using by-tag pull specs is dangerous, and while we still allow it in combination with --force for backward compatibility, it would be much safer to pass a by-digest pull spec instead
warning: The requested upgrade image is not one of the available updates.You have used --allow-explicit-upgrade for the update to proceed anyway
warning: --force overrides cluster verification of your supplied release image and waives any update precondition failures.
Requesting update to release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 

3. The upgrade is not succeeds: [0]
$ oc get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532   True        True          17h     Unable to apply 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107: wait has exceeded 40 minutes for these operators: network

One node degrided to 'NotReady,SchedulingDisabled' status:
$ oc get nodes
NAME                          STATUS                        ROLES    AGE   VERSION
ostest-9vllk-master-0         Ready                         master   19h   v1.24.0+07c9eb7
ostest-9vllk-master-1         Ready                         master   19h   v1.24.0+07c9eb7
ostest-9vllk-master-2         Ready                         master   19h   v1.24.0+07c9eb7
ostest-9vllk-worker-0-4x4pt   NotReady,SchedulingDisabled   worker   18h   v1.24.0+3882f8f
ostest-9vllk-worker-0-h6kcs   Ready                         worker   18h   v1.24.0+3882f8f
ostest-9vllk-worker-0-xhz9b   Ready                         worker   18h   v1.24.0+3882f8f

$ oc get pods -A | grep -v -e Completed -e Running
NAMESPACE                                          NAME                                                         READY   STATUS      RESTARTS       AGE
openshift-openstack-infra                          coredns-ostest-9vllk-worker-0-4x4pt                          0/2     Init:0/1    0              18h
 
$ oc get events
LAST SEEN   TYPE      REASON                                        OBJECT            MESSAGE
7m15s       Warning   OperatorDegraded: MachineConfigDaemonFailed   /machine-config   Unable to apply 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107: failed to apply machine config daemon manifests: error during waitForDaemonsetRollout: [timed out waiting for the condition, daemonset machine-config-daemon is not ready. status: (desired: 6, updated: 6, ready: 5, unavailable: 1)]
7m15s       Warning   MachineConfigDaemonFailed                     /machine-config   Cluster not available for [{operator 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532}]: failed to apply machine config daemon manifests: error during waitForDaemonsetRollout: [timed out waiting for the condition, daemonset machine-config-daemon is not ready. status: (desired: 6, updated: 6, ready: 5, unavailable: 1)]

$ oc get co
NAME                                       VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
authentication                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      18h    
baremetal                                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
cloud-controller-manager                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
cloud-credential                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
cluster-autoscaler                         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
config-operator                            4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
console                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      18h    
control-plane-machine-set                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      17h    
csi-snapshot-controller                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
dns                                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        True          False      19h     DNS "default" reports Progressing=True: "Have 5 available node-resolver pods, want 6."
etcd                                       4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
image-registry                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        True          False      18h     Progressing: The registry is ready...
ingress                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      18h    
insights                                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
kube-apiserver                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        True          False      18h     NodeInstallerProgressing: 1 nodes are at revision 11; 2 nodes are at revision 13
kube-controller-manager                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
kube-scheduler                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
kube-storage-version-migrator              4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
machine-api                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
machine-approver                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
machine-config                             4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532   False       True          True       16h     Cluster not available for [{operator 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532}]: failed to apply machine config daemon manifests: error during waitForDaemonsetRollout: [timed out waiting for the condition, daemonset machine-config-daemon is not ready. status: (desired: 6, updated: 6, ready: 5, unavailable: 1)]
marketplace                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
monitoring                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      18h    
network                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        True          True       19h     DaemonSet "/openshift-ovn-kubernetes/ovnkube-node" rollout is not making progress - last change 2022-09-20T14:16:13Z...
node-tuning                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      17h    
openshift-apiserver                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      18h    
openshift-controller-manager               4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      17h    
openshift-samples                          4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      17h    
operator-lifecycle-manager                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
service-ca                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
storage                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        True          False      19h     ManilaCSIDriverOperatorCRProgressing: ManilaDriverNodeServiceControllerProgressing: Waiting for DaemonSet to deploy node pods...

[0] http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/1074531

Actual results:

OCP 4.11 --> 4.12 upgrade fails.

Expected results:

OCP 4.11 --> 4.12 upgrade success.

Additional info:

Attached logs of the NotReady node - [^journalctl_ostest-9vllk-worker-0-4x4pt.log.tar.gz]

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3422

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1448

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-858. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

In OCP 4.9, the package-server-manager was introduced to manage the packageserver CSV. However, when OCP 4.8 in upgraded to 4.9, the packageserver stays stuck in v0.17.0, which is the version in OCP 4.8, and v0.18.3 does not roll out, which is the version in OCP 4.9

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OCP 4.8

2. Upgrade to OCP 4.9 

$ oc get clusterversion 
NAME      VERSION                             AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.8.0-0.nightly-2022-08-31-160214   True        True          50m     Working towards 4.9.47: 619 of 738 done (83% complete)

$ oc get clusterversion 
NAME      VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.9.47    True        False         4m26s   Cluster version is 4.9.47
 

Actual results:

Check packageserver CSV. It's in v0.17.0 

$ oc get csv  NAME            DISPLAY          VERSION   REPLACES   PHASE packageserver   Package Server   0.17.0               Succeeded 

Expected results:

packageserver CSV is at 0.18.3 

Additional info:

packageserver CSV version in 4.8: https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/blob/release-4.8/manifests/0000_50_olm_15-packageserver.clusterserviceversion.yaml#L12

packageserver CSV version in 4.9: https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/blob/release-4.9/pkg/manifests/csv.yaml#L8

• https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/pull/381

Description of problem:

The path used by --rotated-pod-logs to gather the rotated pod logs from /var/log/pods node folder via /api/v1/nodes/${NODE}/proxy/logs/${LOG_PATH} is only valid for regular pods but not for static pods.

The main problem is that, while normal pods have their rotated logs at this /var/log/pods/${POD_NAME}_${POD_UID_IN_API}/${CONTAINER_NAME}, static pods have them at /var/log/pods/${POD_NAME}_${CONFIG_HASH}/${CONTAINER_NAME} because the UID cannot be known at the time that the static pod is born (because static pods are created by kubelet before registering them in the kube-apiserver, and UID is assigned by the kube-apiserver).

The visible results of that are:

• Spurious errors of not found resources related to the pods.
• Rotated pod logs are not gathered even if present.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10

How reproducible:

Always if there are static pods.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. oc adm inspect --rotated-pod-logs ns/openshift-etcd (or any other project with static pods).

Actual results:

• Rotated pods not gathered.
• Errors like these

  error: errors occurred while gathering data:
      one or more errors occurred while gathering pod-specific data for namespace: openshift-etcd
  
      [one or more errors occurred while gathering container data for pod etcd-master-0.example.net:
  
      the server could not find the requested resource, one or more errors occurred while gathering container data for pod etcd-master-1.example.net:
  
      the server could not find the requested resource, one or more errors occurred while gathering container data for pod etcd-master-2.example.net:
  
      the server could not find the requested resource]
  

Expected results:

No errors like the ones above and rotated pod logs to be gathered, if present.

Additional info:

Despite being marked as experimental, this --rotated-pod-logs is used in must-gather, so this issue can be easily reproduced by just running a default must-gather. I focused on bare oc adm inspect reproducers for simplicity.

• https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/1239

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1417. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Egress IP is not being assigned to primary interface of node as per hostsubnet definition. The issue being observed at an Openshift cluster hosted on Disconnected AWS environment.  Following steps were performed at AWS end:

- Disconnected VPC was created and installation of Openshift was done as per documentation.
- Elastic IP could not be used as it is a disconnected environment. Customer identified a free IP from same subnet as the node and modified interface of the node to add a secondary IP.

It seems cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig annotation is need on the node to attach IP to primary interface but its missing. From SDN POD log on the same node I  could see its complaining about 'an incomplete annotation "cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig"'. Will share more details over comments.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Openshift 4.10.28

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a disconnected environment on AWS
2. find a free IP from subnet where a worker node is hosted and add that as secondary  IP to NIC of that node.
3. Configure hostsubnet and netnamespace on Openshift cluster

Actual results:

- Eress IP is not being attached to primary interface of node for which hostsubnet has been configured

Expected results:

- Egress IP should get configured without any issue.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/pull/84

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/973

We're seeing a slight uptick in how long upgrades are taking[1][2]. We are not 100% sure of the cause, but it looks like it started with 4.11 rc.7. There's no obvious culprits in the diff[3].

Looking at some of the jobs, we are seeing the gaps between kube-scheduler being updated and then machine-api appear to take longer. Example job run[4] showing 10+ minutes waiting for it.

TRT had a debugging session, and we have two suggestions:

• Adding logging around when CVO sees an operator version changed

• Instead of a fixed polling interval at 5 minutes (which is what we think CVO is doing), would it be possible to trigger on the CO to know when to look again? We think there could be some substantial savings on upgrade time by doing this.

[1] https://search.ci.openshift.org/graph/metrics?metric=job%3Aduration%3Atotal%3Aseconds&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-sdn-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-azure-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-sdn-upgrade
[2] https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.12/analysis?test=Cluster%20upgrade.%5Bsig-cluster-lifecycle%5D%20cluster%20upgrade%20should%20complete%20in%2075.00%20minutes
[3] https://amd64.ocp.releases.ci.openshift.org/releasestream/4-stable/release/4.11.0-rc.7
[4] https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-azure-sdn-upgrade/1556865989923049472

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pull/826